Loading...
1254 backup S August 21 , 2002 Center Lake Properties Attn: Dale Ladd 1135 East Avenue Clermont, FL 34711 Re: Conditional Use Permit — City of Clermont, Block 82 Dear Mr. Ladd, The City Council of the City of Clermont approved your request for a Conditional Use Permit at their regular scheduled meeting held Tuesday, May 28, 2002. Enclosed are the original and a copy of the Agreement to Conditions. Please sign the original in the presence of a notary public and return it to the office of the City Manager. Please note that the agreement must be signed and returned within ninety (90) days (August 28, 2002) or the Conditional Use Permit will become null and void. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Wayne Saunders City Manager WS/jcm Enclosures G 4 CAL x_1 ( // v r e(, h vt_y 7avic- i7 vt- e �► 5 7a o vm 4/ LSe 5 0 os / 6GeLS 1. 7S S C r‘✓teis)._ 2 P , / yi,twfl Pe V o v s4_K4 • i a k ✓k,� S ✓ tji/l v) J�Z� t/76° 6 ✓ / C e LA't/1\._ 0-71- ‘1 %LS e7 -e.e. -12.4.br-A_GL7- t✓ 74 ✓'C C, S� MCL1 ° '56— /Lk ✓AftG SGt-toot ` .74.)/e41-- S )4 , '~ (1t2 ter, .-f 4 V ! c1 , 5 oK-/c` t' 6 (k `. tfPmt �+w 6 17 y OF 4177 5'F ' X 55z- r„,.5 f7(4,44. 1s • 77-5 a d el. 1e. — C a) 1,7 2_777/ v / /2 ‘14 5 2- G�w de , e �6 �IK� 2_ y-z_ 4 t 1k_ O r/0°v 1t 2 C/ 17QP17 -F-7-(cC vet A-✓j, is �����w . � 17?w'' `Q cl_ CCYctArl CL l��K�� • City of Clermont Planning and Zoning Commission May 7, 2002 AGENDA ITEM # 7, Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development APPLICANT: Center Lake Partnership OWNER: Same REQUEST: For a Conditional Use Permit to create a Planned Unit Development to allow for the construction of a mixed-use development that will consist of residential, retail, office, personal service, and restaurant uses. LOCATION: The old hospital complex on Eighth St. EXISTING LAND USE: Vacated hospital complex. FUTURE LAND USE DISTRICT: Established Business District — 1 (EBD-1). FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: Central Business District. EXISTING ZONING: CBD, Central Business District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The applicant is proposing to develop a mixed- use project that will consist of residential, retail, professional office, personal service, and restaurant uses. The project will be designed as a traditional downtown development so that it will integrate with the established theme of the historic downtown area. Staff supports the proposed redevelopment of the old hospital site. The project meets the criteria of the land use designations and zoning district and therefore staff recommends approval with the following conditions: Section 1 - General Conditions 1 . The conditions as set forth in this Conditional Use Permit shall be legally binding upon any heirs, assigns and successors in title or interest. 2. No further expansion of the use or additions to the facility shall be permitted except as approved by another Conditional Use Permit. 3. The property shall be developed in substantial accordance with the conceptual site plan prepared by The Evans Group and dated March 1 ,2002. Formal construction plans, incorporating all conditions stated in this permit, shall 1 be submitted for review and approved by the Site Review Committee prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance or other development permits. The conceptual site plans submitted with the CUP application are not the approved construction plans. 4. No person, firm, corporation or entity shall erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, remove, improve, move, convert, or demolish any building or structure, or alter the land in any manner within the boundary of the project without first submitting necessary plans, obtaining necessary approvals, and obtaining necessary permits in accordance with the City of Clermont Land Development Regulations and those of other appropriate jurisdictional entities. 5. The final Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued until each of the stated conditions has been met. 6. If any of the stated conditions are violated, the applicant understands and agrees that the City Council may revoke this Conditional Use Permit by resolution. 7. The Conditional Use Permit must be executed and filed in the office of the City Clerk within 90 days of its date of grant by the City Council or the permit shall become null and void. 8. This permit shall become null and void if substantial construction work has not begun within two (2) years of the date of this Conditional Use Permit is executed and signed by the permittee. "Substantial construction work" means the commencement and continuous prosecution of construction of required improvements ultimately finalized at completion. Section 2 - Land Use 1. The proposed development may consist of residential, retail, professional office, personal service, and restaurant uses. Section 3 - Excavation and Grading/Operation Plans 1. Detailed grading, erosion control, and dust abatement plans for the entire site shall be submitted to and approved by the Site Review Committee prior to construction plan approval and the initiation of development activity. The dust abatement plan shall detail measures to be taken to eliminate the migration of dust particles from the site. 2. The permittee/developers shall provide ground cover on all out parcel and disturbed areas, where construction is not immediately intended. Ground cover 2 shall be provided in accordance with an approved ground cover plan acceptable to the City in accordance with best management practices (BMP) of the U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service. 3. All excavated material shall be stored in a location approved by the City Engineer. 4. Ingress and egress to the site for construction shall be determined by the City Engineer. Section 4 - Transportation Improvements 1 . Sidewalks shall be required along all public road frontages. Section 5 - Utilities 1. Restaurants will be required to install grease traps at a size to be determined by the Public Works Director. Section 6 - Architectural Design Standards Architectural design shall be similar to and contain the major design elements as depicted on the conceptual architecture plans as prepared by The Evans Group and dated February 25, 2002. Architectural plans for all buildings must be submitted to and approved by the Site Review Committee prior to construction plan approval. 3 • Mar 26 02 08: 07a CITY OF CLERMONT 352 394 3542 p.3 0 t _ ac CITY OF CLERMONT APPUCATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DATE March 28, 2002 APPLICANT: Center Lake Partnership 1135 East Avenue, Clermont, FL 34711 APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 1 FAXS 394-5971 `PHO #NE 394-R tiRti OWNER: same OWNER'S ADDRESS same PHONES FAX# 847 8th Street ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: GENERAL LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. North of Juniata St. , South of Desoto St, West of 7th St, East of 8th St. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: . City of Clermont Block 82 CBD ZONING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: p. 4 CITY OF CLE RMONT APPUCATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Page—2— DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(What you are proposing to do and why it Is appropriate for the location. Attach additional pages If necessary): Request for a PUD. to allow the construction of a mixed use project to consist of residential, ret - il, professional office, personal service and .r^3taurant uses. • r1 ,1!) [YE s ttiu Sign Applicant Name of Applicant(please print) L [,\\L 1 L U & ' 1 t' Signature of Property Owner Name of Property Owner(please **""'***NOTICE***"*"" IF THIS APPUCATION IS SUBMITTED INCOMPLETE OR INACCURATE IT WILL BE SUBJECT TO A DELAY IN PROCESSING AND WILL NOT BE SCHEDULED UNTIL SUCH CORRECTIONS ARE MADE. N — - , . t WI.NAP HAS.0.cownum ram • N 17"'" ".WO"="ruta 4 L I. 6 Ht.IL"P Al 0 K.14/6411 OVCHrHH Ir . . , . ili 0 .; NMVIIIMMMEgE MONNIONWIr _ 71 NOWE1311 Ff. . ANNIum . i4:1 ( EE SW.- •H/T 4 N.) Otter.: , -q--1 0 6 ,e_0■... ,',A I , e6 Al- § ' ' 4‘..' 13/13 '.' ' ' ' f• f•,..... r. P . 1 ®2 . 4111111111111 411111111 1119;11P oo• Maw ;I b'" ''' "I 11113.11113 •-•- M ' ' -" 0 i .11 TIN.. . , ,„ , 0 N WEST mmr WIRIKOM 2 12: •.! MEM Cro ATI ' 1 • ":,1, iciLi 2: ; SEMI 'ta ' s '4,1•5310 Willkill J 0112111[111111110o- ri raemprnoti„maim, E, , ::', OEMS MN o, IIIMIESPa 1. mow 1•4 . . a i7jj > gdairammatMolliiift-IME I &I › °maga F•Eilailg 4,.. .ium ft 1.1 I r•.1 1,1 E.0 L A, LL ' 1 . ' YATIMR MINN ' 10 1 4W i; lo Walk. /4). miwAnimM millit6 LIY! 1;111,11111 5 (Dil ® 4012111 11111111114 14111M" 19 "'el ok 44., i4wilikl.nmilig kommiaNNO 3 WRIMmiku&mk'm. ilit IMEMPIWRIiMUE -T1F • II ligtim co. c) g-tii 0 to'lpetbrwil nogn 1 mr"3111114104 MiNfigg *: ,„ umm = oviv • n Nekii.., • 0- - MST 1211/1 ... . .r.i 1,109,Fla • NE WIMICAMILNP0 .. , M ' MIME IMP " ' 1 . , a • . 1 A Aili lit. MEM 7.c-tMUMM • ,,..... i. .•-. II - ANOW. , AAR MEMMIMit ..--=-wo millicli _W . , 11,1411111 M 11 411110111 111 Mil 11 416imi"011111 PIMA i l 211ValinTIM - mirror i.-A al MO linMingli railliiiE 1.1501kla 6 git • ii =kin• im MilA MM" g iff 11:611 PROM 'mugai • • 'J m MUM MOE m-. Balm mmuRNMAINE ROBINOW - am ' 1 k 3 if,' DESOTO GOVT. LOT N(.1 w= GOVT. LOT 'NO. 4 C.-: OVT LC: " Nr.:. ;=, • • . riarowootti . , . Now , x.: , - Tom • Neel :I') '' 111 innims asiziklaN Hillseld0 ONIZIR. MEM Wank OEM afrOMIUNF -/ , , 0.0 .4MPUMMEM .2FC 0 ROm 1dormaffi .mw4gam *AL NW PA4MMA rimaNWOL, • m=A -liWIMIONKE g'''IVI,' ---, rot ummwkliir NMPAWNAM .WAYA!NWIMMM iLlailMie . 8618 MIVIIIM OP ' - 'NEAL illitibrEIHt4t :':•01:Ild:ii • - 3 U.PC11 4 • i * . • jug sJuv.,,AT 0.. 1 C T ' . .• . . 1 • • 1 1• . . . ililic 11111Pr ''' ENF._R l \'. WM! IMMO= IRT- rillinrgrilk • . 0 ows s . • i `0,'%' _ffy .r... :I' : Pelt PgithAliEWN ik ,. - 14 iffloil, ' WI:''''-2.s,, . . .. . gulp 46frolzu 1 • •,.., \ . 3 W min MAL \ . L ,t\ Y, ARNEatakW WI Ntil , RIOR141. .. -,p• • . ;tin 4 B110014%. ,\ X All . \ Win M re"TiriOL.'` NW ,-WNW Warbill: L 00.4141 ' . "RI - •ow. 16119E1 • '. 4. Ong• . . :0 7:11114. ...':'11CAM I, N'----,■. .--___.-__ • ' 111111.1"..!'..d Z k.g.g...eel0lligraEr.. . rME12 l.5 SI llil—i t3!il e .1.'ISSI..."5 Ailfile_IM-,`-'74111111il,,L)a'. • . _ Ac.aa rn,,,,.. -----1 _2_. 1`.. 7,1.3 ! !! ! t ! ' !'MWWMANiir21.1. 41=ANNWARVitiMW Am"' titraitt • • •• . • • III , , . - • , , MI MNiffatisa , . • ., 1- . o- . . STATE DD. • •. N.a 5,0, • .' . . 1 ___,7„ -...m.lhumiiraidi• . NM \O- AMM4101102-AM Paramcdommil wroant numplmoulopopow* 9 .1 • Nallitifli.113 ° 361111 it'Jriaritmav PligIrjn - zmnilliiiiii4 lailirilit - .'4W - I•6 . „ l'i -T ti , • . . . • • . . 9 0 a 14/a S S • 6U8DIV131014 1\10V:"X. , . . . .. , . • 1.1 C■ !JAW& P.IN• A 6. •• • • .• - CITY OF CLERAA01,IT. 6 MARUS CENTER.Mk!'&ROO • ORO 13“ PG 0926-0952 . • • . • 8 • ' • I 9.Vh,R.I • • • a C11.C.8IVI5..U/ 5 60 • • . . . • . . . . S 9.L LA V I 6 T A 1.14.I41.1TS. 8 al . .. • . • . • 4 5%31494.T PARK.. 6 19 • • • • - . ,-....., • ••. 0 5 LAKE DOT VILLAS (CONDO) ORB 743 2M8 • • '... '• ' . • AA. . . • • . . . ., rr 3 2 I vZ- C l sF/-1/4-1-- `TAR /2 vzi s ..er,„4 vc./ e j` -1 (JZ ? \/ ✓ QGS 1 ,c. S'A f �;'� a5f°Gfa4nvt- vel5 lc 0 0 ?1--V?7 e -14) h / A fre- .�- V it c 0-9 t 2 o tic/ A2 , c/A-- t" de t 7` ✓rsu�4 ��- City of Clermont TO: Site Review Committee FROM: Pam Bennett, Development Rev. Coordinator DATE: March 18, 2002 SUBJECT: GALLERIA AT CLERMONT There will be a Site Review Committee meeting on Wednesday, March 20, 2002 at 1:00 P.M. to review the attached revised conceptual site plans for the redevelopment of the old hospital site. cc: Wayne Saunders, City Manager Tamara Richardson, City Engineer Barry Brown, Director of Planning Preston Davis, Director of Public Services Paul Anderson, City Fire Captain err WY City of Clermont TO: Site Review Committee 1 FROM: Pam Bennett, Development Rev. Coordinator DATE: December 18, 2001 SUBJECT: OLD SOUTH LAKE HOSPITAL There will be a Site Review Committee meeting on Wednesday, December 19, 2001 at 3:00 P.M. to review the conceptual plan for a commercial project on the old South Lake Hospital site. The conceptual site plan is attached. cc: Wayne Saunders, City Manager Tamara Richardson, City Engineer Barry Brown, Director of Planning Preston Davis, Director of Public Services Carle Bishop, City Fire Chief Mimi Ogden, Highland Development ! 1 oa 1/4.0 So. LkE F INP aL� � bus 5, e 1 t/i6 At/ A scii"' o v m of mac/ es vgvIe ®prs� r/ 4os L l as �7dGv� /12 HOC c"7 a � i G _. • • - /AT iv., 1? 1 F rtvu.cli 1},c( . • 'e7 p jf 15-r- e str(-76.74 1,,,Ls4L- _p_ oe ge, -lTro4—tect-fic- oz-5 e> " c7 r7' ric_t 21-t,e/e- e e g--ed AZIA SeA"./1Z- ?:141:47i?i("PZCI:::062 ehit,re- 423LD/k1-. 5[,ei/ev. Lt., c (de,d4*Cs Cif‘41 t I (It Sle-*,4 vi'.---- 42 /e- d vvi- bu If - fcI • p OWNERSHIP POSSIBILITIES South Lake County or South Lake County or First United Memorial Hospital Inter-Agency** Methodist Church HOSPITAL BUILDING PURPOSE: House existing service agencies and others not currently located in south Lake County for period of 5-7 years in existing hospital building. Services currently available to south Lake County community (e.g., Clermont, Minneola, Groveland, Mascotte, Monthverde) are limited by locations being widespread and transportation. Agencies generally have limited funding available for facilities and even less for transportation of clients to their facilities. Other services are not readily available to south Lake County residents because providers are located elsewhere in Lake County. ALTERNATIVES: Consider use of existing hospital building for period of 5-7 years followed by construction of new facility. Or if use of hospital building is not feasible, consider construction of new facility. IDENTIFY: Service agencies that could locate into this building. Each agency would pay usual expenses associated with renting facilities (e.g., rent, electrical, phone, etc.) FUNDING: Seek initial funding necessary to relocate agencies, perform minimal repairs on building, hire staff, etc. Possible sources would include United Way, South Lake County Community Foundation, Edith Bush Foundation, and other grants. **Fictitious name for organization to include member agencies housed within building. OUTLINE OF ISSUES 1. Determine feasibility of using existi4 hospital building to house service agencies under ownership of Hospital or Church. Engineering studies performed for the City of Clermont revealed inadequacies of building to meet required standards for use as city hall. How much in the way of repairs would be needed for occupancy by many agencies needs to be determined early on. Presently, there are occupants in the building (e.g., Diamond Players Club). 2. It's estimated that the building has about 60,000 square feet, all of which could not be used. Identifying which space can be effectively utilized is a must, recognizing that it is unlikely that any structural changes in the building would be cost-effective. Partitions in a large room would be appropriate modifications. 3. Should major expenditures (e.g., more than $50,000???) be required to establish initial occupancy and knowing that there could be the need for repairs during the period of occupancy (e.g., air conditioning, elevator, etc.), the cost of the project needs to be considered. If it were possible to develop a reasonable estimate, then the feasibility of this alternative could be established. (Assistance of a contractor appears necessary in order to assess the usability of the floor space in the building and any costs associated with the use of that space.) 4. If it were determined that the cost of occupying the hospital building would be prohibitive for just a 5-7 year period, for example, then any funding for this project could best be utilized for the purchase of another site. This could be either the purchase of any existing facility (probably unlikely) that could be renovated for this purpose or the purchase of land and construction of a new building. Fund raising could prove difficult without experience in first running such a facility. 5. The organizational structure of this undertaking would be dictated by the alternative being considered. Legal advice might be necessary to establish the organizational structure. For example, if the hospital should choose to continue ownership under the option form of conveyance to the church, the organizational structure might be as simple as having an executive director for the center of the facility responsible to the executive director of the hospital. A similar arrangement might work with the church having ownership and the executive director reporting to the governing body of the church. 6. If neither of alternatives in (5) above is suitable, it might be necessary to form an independent organization that might be called the South Lake County Inter-Agency Corp., registered as a tax-exempt organization. It would have its own board of directors with appropriate representation from various interests. Any staffing needs would report to the Board. 7. Identifying which agencies or other\organizations should be housed in the building will be a challenging task should there be more interested parties than there is space available. The amount of space to be utilized in the old hospital building needs to be determined first. Then the agencies interested in occupying the available space can be reviewed for selection. It might best be handled by a panel of persons. DRAFT 9/17/00 EXPLANATION OF THE FRONT PORCH FLORIDA INITIATIVE AND PROCESS Front Porch Florida is different. It is a grass roots, bottom-up revitalization initiative that focuses on the family and empowers residents to define and resolve neighborhood problems. The solutions for changing the neighborhood come from the community,not government, through a process that is holistic and builds on community assets and relationships. Neighborhoods receive designation as a Front Porch Florida community through a competitive process. Applications are submitted by a nominating entity, or a coalition of nominating entities, on behalf of a community. The Front Porch Florida designation is awarded to the community,not to the nominating entity. All applications received prior to the deadline date are reviewed for completeness and eligibility. Once deemed to be complete and eligible,applications are reviewed and submitted to the Governor. The Governor makes the selection decision. Once a community is designated,a series of community meetings are held immediately to develop community awareness and participation. It is the responsibility of the nominating entity to set up these community meetings and actively invite residents, business owners, neighborhood associations, etc. A Governor's Revitalization Council, a volunteer group, is formed as the result of these community meetings,to lead the revitalization effort. The Revitalization Council must be formed within four to six weeks following receipt of the Front Porch Florida designation and it must represent the community. The Revitalization Council,with input from neighborhood residents and business owners, will develop a Neighborhood Action Plan for revitalization setting forth the community's goals for change. The plan will be due to the Office of Urban Opportunity within 14 weeks following the formation of the Revitalization Council. The Office of Urban Opportunity will select and fund a Community Liaison position to provide administrative support to the Revitalization Council After the community and the Office of Urban Opportunity adopt the Action Plan, resources from both inside and outside the community will be identified to implement the plan. Assistance will be given from the State of Florida to help implement the Action Plan. Many outside resources will flow through a designated Fiscal Agent selected by the Office of Urban Opportunity. Other resources will flow directly to organizations within the community. 06/19/2000 02: 56 135274.5 CHS LAKE PAGE 09 PROPOSED COALITION OF SERVICES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES AT THE FLORIDA WATERMAN HOSPITAL SITE \Q 1. Lead Entity/Fiscal Agent Offices a Vohmteer Center 1. Foster Grandparents Z Mentors 3. Big Brothers/Big Sisters 4. R.S.V.P. 5. Lake County Citizen's Commission for Children 6. Angel Flight 7. Shriners Burn Unit, Lions Sight, Rotary, Kiwanis 2. Health and Health Related Social Services a. Health Department Services b. WIC c. Healthy Start d_ Healthy Families e. Hug Me f Dental Association g. Deaf Services h. CUE Services L DEI j. Teen Pregnancy Prevention k. We Care L Tobacco Free Partnership m. ARC Model Day Care and Training Center 3. Counseling/Intervention a. Children's Advocacy Center b. Children's Home Society c. Arnette House d. Charter Springs Behavioral e. Boys Ranch f. Haven g. Life Streams h. Hospice i. United Cerebral Palsy j. Youth and Family Alternatives k A.A. and Alanon 4. Community Services a. Childhood Development Services b. Day Care Licensing c. Parent Resource Library d. Economic Services and One Stop Career Center uoi 1Di :_UUU U_. 133L/'4Zt' UID L/-4K.t ~A 1e Page Two e. Child Support f Boys and Girls Club g. Veterans Affairs h. Habitat for Humanity i. Section 8 and Affordable Housing j. Boy Scouts/Girl Scouts k. Adult and Aging L Teen Court m. Christian Social Services n. Consumer Credit Counseling o. Safe Kids Coalition p. Legal Aid q. ARC 5. Community Education a. Head Start/Even Start/Early Start b. Model Day Care and Training Center under UCF or LSCC c. Children's Issues Research and Independent Evaluation Center under UCF or LSCC d. School Readiness Coalition 6. Child Abuse/Neglect Intervention a. Child Protection Team Medical Services b. Law Enforcement,DCF Investigations, Protective Supervision, and Legal Center c. Family Builders/In-Home Parenting d. Supervised Visitation Center - Separate locations are being recommended for therapeutic group homes and a new vision in temporary emergency shelters for children. Other agencies not listed here will be welcomed additions. This list is not intended to be all inclusive. It is simply intended to present a range of the vision. Interested partners in this endeavor are encouraged to visit the Howard Phillips Center for Children and Families, a part of the Arnold Palmer Hospital, 601 W. Michigan Street, Orlando 32805, 407-317-7430. Although this center is a much smaller scale of our proposal, an understanding of the vision the initiative has for Lake County can be obtained. Please call Glenna Osborne, Children's Home Society(742-6170) for assistance with these tours_ OVERVIEW OF GRANT FUNDING The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is the largest grant-making agency in the Federal government. In Fiscal Year 1998, HHS awarded nearly $158 billion in Federal grants. Of those funds, approximately 87% were for mandatory grant programs, such as Medicaid. The remaining $19.7 billion funded discretionary grants (grants in which the Department selected the grantees). These discretionary grant awards fund health and social science research and social and health services throughout the country. HIS is highly decentralized. Its eleven (11)principal operating divisions administer over 300 grant programs. Each operating division has grants and program offices, which administer grant programs. These offices are the best sources of information on HHS grants, Program offices are responsible for the programmatic, technical, and/or scientific aspects of grant programs. Grants offices are responsible for issuing grant awards and overseeing the business and financial management of grant awards. Information contacts are usually included in the grant program announcements published in the Federal Register, as well as in the grant program information contained in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA). In some cases, contacts in both program and grants offices are provided in both publications. Program offices are the best source of information about program initiatives and priorities, eligibility criteria, application format and submission, and.the status of award notifications. Grants offices are the best source of information on financial and business management requirements that grantees must follow. The Grants Management Offices listed on the following page can provide information about their respective grant programs or refer you to the appropriate grant and program offices within their agency. However, we urge that you identify specific programs of interest using the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance whenever possible so that you can contact directly the appropriate program or grants office. CgP}_ ohlir-. o,ddrt55 • Wttlwtri ( THE GRANTS PROCESS (CONTINUED) • CLOSE-OUT PROCESS, Grantees must incur their costs within the allowed project or budget periods. The grantee has 90 days following the final budget period to liquidate (make payment on) all their unpaid obligations and submit their required final reports. Reporting requirements may vary somewhat from program to program, however, at a minimum a programmatic and a financial report must be submitted to the designated grants office. \\ GRANT INFORMATION SOURCES (CONTINUED) HRSA PREVIEW This specialty publication of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) provides information on current funding opportunities available for primary health care, health professions, maternal and child health, and HIV/AIDS. It is published semi-annually. The HRSA Preview is available in the following formats: • Internet: Text only, fully formatted and Spanish versions are available through the HRSA web site at www.hrsa.dhhs.gov. • Published Text: To be placed on the mailing list, call l-888-333-HRSA. gjWIOnl GrantsNct is the HITS web site for grant information. It is administered by the Office of Grants Management in the Office of the Secretary. It provides useful information on administering grant awards, such as the Office of Management and Budget Circulars and the Code of Federal Regulations, including HITS regulations, and other pertinent policy information. GrantsNet also provides links to the CFDA, Federal Register, NIH Guide to Grants and Contracts, HRSA Preview and all the HHS operating divisions. The GrantsNet web site is located at wwv.hhs.gov/progorg/grantsnet. HITS GRANTS AND PROGRAM OFFICES As referenced earlier, HHS grants and program offices which administer grant programs are the best sources for information on specific HITS grant programs.