Loading...
09-20-2011 Regular Meeting CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 The regular meeting of the Code Enforcement Board was called to order on Tuesday, September 20, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. Members attending were James Purvis, Chairman, Chandra Myers, Ken Forte, Alfred Mannella, Les Booker, Dave Holt, and Ed Carver. Also attending were Jim Hitt, Planning Director, Curt Henschel, City Planner, Suzanne O'Shea, -Code Enforcement Officer, Al Freeman, Water Conservation Coordinator, Dan Mantzaris, City Attorney, Valerie Fuchs, Code Enforcement Board Attorney and Rae Chidlow, Administrative Assistant. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. The minutes from the Code Enforcement Board meeting of August 16, 2011 were approved. Code Enforcement Chairman Jim Purvis read the Opening Remarks. Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea and Water Conservation Coordinator Al Freeman, along with any of the public who may testify, were sworn in. Chandra Myers was sworn in. Chairman Jim Purvis gave the floor to Code Enforcement Staff and City Attorney. City Attorney Dan Mantzaris stated that Case No. 11 -762 has complied and will not be heard. He stated that Case No. 11 -774 is being tabled to the October 18, 2011 meeting. Les Booker made a motion to table Case No. 11 -774 to the October 18, 2011 meeting; seconded by Alfred Mannella. The vote -was unanimous in favor of tabling this case. CASE NO. 11 -768 Dagama LeBlanc & Catherine Philbert 1239 Lattimore Dr. Clermont, FL 34711 LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 1239 Lattimore, Clermont, FL 34711 VIOLATION: Section #66 -22D, Water Restrictions City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. The Respondent was present. Al Freeman stated that on February 14, 2011 the Respondent was issued a warning. He stated that on June 2, 2011 they were issued a second violation notice that was left on their door. He stated that a notice was also sent by mail and certified mail that was signed for and received. He stated that the fine was never paid. He stated that the third violation was issued on July 19, 2011. He stated that notice was also left on the door, mailed regular and certified mail that was not signed for. He stated that neither fine has been paid as of today. He stated that the property was posted by Suzanne O'Shea and there was no response from either Respondent. 1 CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 City Attorney Dan Mantzaris stated that the City is seeking that a lien of $300 be placed on the property. Dagama LeBlanc, 1239 Lattimore Dr., was sworn in. She stated that the second fine of $50 has been paid. She stated they were having problems with their irrigation system coming on automatically. She stated that when it rains the system would reset itself and come on at the wrong times. She stated that her landscaper has fixed the problem. She stated that she will pay the fine, but she cannot pay it all at once. Chairman Purvis asked if she brought anything in writing from the landscapers proving that there was an issue with the irrigation system. She stated that she did not bring anything but she could get something from the landscapers if she needed to. Chairman Purvis asked the Respondent if the fine can be paid by October 18, 2011. Ms. LeBlanc stated that she could pay the fine by that date. Alfred Mannella made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a lien of $300 to be assessed on October 18, 2011 if payment is not received by that date; seconded by Ken Forte. The vote was unanimous in favor of finding the Respondent in violation and in favor of the time period and the amount of the fine. CASE NO. 11 -764 James Pool 1301 Lake Ave. Clermont, FL 34711 LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 1301 Lake Ave., Clermont, FL 34711 VIOLATION: Chapter 34, Section 34 -61 (1)(2)(3); Unlawful Maintenance of Nuisances City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. The Respondent was present. Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea, stated that she was sworn in, exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to the following: Overgrowth of grass and weeds on the property, in excess of 18 inches. Miscellaneous items scattered around the property consisting of tires, gas cans, hoses, rugs, wood, metal, etc. Compliance of this violation will be when the following occurs: The entire lot is uniformly trimmed and mowed below 18 inches and cut vegetative debris is removed from the property. Must dispose or conceal storage of all abovementioned miscellaneous items located on the property. She stated that the grass has been cut, so the Respondent is not being charged with the overgrown grass and weeds. She stated that a fence was put up to hide some of the items. Board member Forte asked if a permit was pulled for the fence. 2 CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 Ms. O'Shea stated that there is no permit for the fence. James Pool, 1301 Lake Ave., was sworn in. He stated that he has a contract with a landscaper who cuts every other week but there had been a lot of rain and the landscaper did take a vacation at that time. He stated that all the trailers are registered. He stated that the truck in the back is being moved and he's already moved the two Chevrolet's. He stated that he did put the fence up and did not realize he needed a permit to put that up but he will get a permit for the fence. He stated that the tree that fell in his yard is from the neighbor's house and the landscaper did clean that up. He stated that any other vehicle on the property that has no tags will be moved this week. He stated that the trailers have tags, he just doesn't keep them on the trailers so that they do not get stolen. David Holt made a motion to find the Respondent in repeat violation of the cited City code with a fine of $250 per day if not complied by October 18, 2011; seconded by Les Booker The vote was unanimous in favor of finding the Respondent in repeat violation with the fine and date. CASE NO. 11 -775 James Pool 1301 Lake Ave. Clermont, FL 34711 LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 1301 Lake Ave., Clermont, FL 34711 VIOLATION: Chapter 34, Section 34 -61; Prohibited Storage City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. The Respondent was present. Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea, stated that she was sworn in, exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to the following: There are numerous non - operative motor vehicles, boats, golf carts, and utility trailers located on the property. Action required to correct violations: Remove all unregistered boats, trailers, golf cart, vehicles, etc. from the property, or store off -site, or in an enclosed garage. Discussion of Case 11 -775 was included under Case 11 -764. David Holt made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a fine of $250 per day if not complied by October 18. 2011; seconded by Les Booker. The vote was unanimous in favor of finding the Respondent in violation with the fine and date. CASE NO. 11 -765 Refuge Church of Our Lord Jesus Christ 2 vacant lots, 50' x 165', west of 670/672 E. Desoto St. Clermont, FL 34711 3 CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 2 vacant lots, 50' x 165', west of 670/672 E. Desoto St., Clermont, FL 34711 VIOLATION: Chapter 34, Section 34 -61 (1)(2); Unlawful Maintenance of Nuisances City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. The Respondent was present. Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea, stated that she was sworn in, exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to the property being extremely overgrown with tall grass and weed in excess of 18 inches. Additionally, there are dead branches and debris scattered throughout the property. Compliance of this violation will be when the premises have been completely cleaned of the items mentioned above, and all vegetation uniformly trimmed and mowed, with all vegetative debris removed from the property. Pastor Forehand stated that he was sworn in. He stated that it was unclear of the property lines that he was responsible for. He stated that once the property lines became clear to him, they got someone to clear the property. Ken Forte amended his motion to find the Respondent in repeat violation of the cited City code with a fine of $100; seconded by Alfred Mannella. The vote was unanimous in favor of finding the Respondent in repeat violation and the amount of the fine. CASE NO. 11 -767 SRGC, LLC & Summit Greens Residents Assn. Various Retention areas and Stormwater Systems located on Sanctuary Ridge Golf Course Clermont, FL 34711 LOCATION OF VIOLATION: Various Retention areas and Stormwater Systems located on Sanctuary Ridge Golf Course, Clermont, FL 34711 VIOLATION: Chapter 86, Section 86 -141; Violation of the Condition Use Permit City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. The Respondent was present. Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea, stated that she was sworn in, exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to the violation of the Conditional Use Permit, Resolution No. 988, adopted on January 27` 1998. Section 6- Stormwater Management Plan Requirements, #5 states, "The developer, or duly authorized and sanctioned Home Owners Association, shall be the entity responsible for the construction and maintenance of the stormwater management system." The retention areas located on the golf course have become extremely overgrown with tall grass and weeds, well in excess of 18 inches. There are large tree branches located in the retention area behind the 2200 block of Caledonian St. There are stormwater system outlets that have 4 CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 accumulated various types of vegetation and miscellaneous debris; including but not limited to, bottles, plastic, and paper. Compliance of this violation will be when the following conditions are met in their entirety: All retention areas have been mowed below 18 inches, with all clippings and vegetative debris removed from the property. All tree limbs and tree debris is removed from the property. Stormwater systems are sufficiently cleaned of all miscellaneous debris and vegetation. Board member Ken Forte stated that he thought that he would have a potential conflict because he is a homeowner in Summit Greens, but he was advised by Code Enforcement Attorney Valerie Fuchs that he does not have a conflict. Board member Alfred Mannella stated that he does have a conflict due to him being a Board member of the Homeowner's Association and he has filled out the 8B Form to state that. He stated that he was advised that he could join the discussion but he will not be voting on the issue. Board member Forte stated that there was mediation between the SRGC and the HOA and there were some agreements between the golf course and the HOA that may or may not interface into this violation. He stated that if there is, he's wondering whether the Board should be inserting themselves into this at all as a Code Enforcement Board. Chris Roper, representing the HOA for Summit Greens, stated that it is not appropriate for the Homeowner's Association to be listed on the violation. He stated that the reason the HOA should not be listed is included in the language of the conditional use permit. He stated that he has a lot of exhibits to introduce into the record and a court reporter. He stated that every time SRGC decides to stop maintaining their property and SRGC asks Code Enforcement to enforce the HOA to pay for it, that this cycle could be repeated indefinitely. Mr. Roper shared a number of exhibits as evidence that the Homeowner's Association is not responsible for maintaining the stormwater and retention areas of Summit Greens subdivision. He stated that he asks that the HOA be dismissed from the violation. Board member David Holt asked which particular document is being used to shift the burden of the maintenance from the developer to the golf course owner. Mr. Roper stated the construction plans is one example where in the notes it states the HOA is responsible for the roadway drainage. He stated that the master stormwater system and the golf course drainage system are to be maintained by SRGC. He stated that there are also covenants on the property that allocate the responsibilities of the stormwater system. Board member Les Booker asked why has this issue not been resolved through the courts. Mr. Roper stated that it's expensive to litigate and they were trying to resolve this issue without litigation, this code enforcement violation came up before reaching a settlement. City attorney Dan Mantzaris stated that Mr. Roper made the comment that the Conditional Use Permit is a guideline that changes as the development is created. He stated that in fact the Conditional Use Permit is the law and must be complied with. He stated that the City is pursuing this matter because the Conditional Use Permit is not being complied with. He stated that the party's are arguing over the responsibility of the work and 5 CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 the City wants the Board to state that there is a violation and it's inconsistent with the Conditional Use Permit and someone has to bring the property into compliance. Craig Edwards, SRGC manager, stated that he was sworn in. He explained what a stormwater system consisted of. He stated that in paragraph four of the agreement between SRGC and the HOA it states the responsibility of the maintenance of the stormwater and retention areas. He explained how the engineers came up with the 60/40 split for the agreement of the maintenance of the stormwater and retention areas. He stated that the HOA is not upholding their responsibilities so his only way to make this happen was to stop the maintenance of these areas and get the City and St. John's Water Management involved. Board member Myers asked to see the complete agreement between SRGC and the HOA. Board member Forte stated that the responsibilities look clear to him and it confuses him as to why there is an issue. He stated that he does not feel it's the Code Enforcement Board's responsibility to settle legal issues. Board member Mannella asked about the ownership of the golf course. Mr. Edwards stated that the Diamond Players Club was the original owners. He stated that they sold it to Mulligan's Society. He stated that when Mulligan's Society defaulted on their loan, it was deeded to a new entity titled SRGC, LLC that was formed for the purpose of taking over the golf course. Board member Mannella asked that the owner of the golf course included Mr. Edwards and other people. Mr. Edwards stated that the owners include him and about 245 stockholders that own SRGC, LLC. He stated they are the stockholders that own OSB Holdings that is the entity that owns the golf course. Board member Mannella asked that Old Southern Bank Holding Company is the umbrella and its stockholders are the owners, and Mr. Edwards is one of the stockholders under this umbrella. Mr. Edwards stated that he agrees with Board member Mannella. Board member Booker stated that SRGC and the HOA came to an agreement and he cannot see any better way to divide the responsibility of the maintenance of the stormwater and retention areas. Mr. Edwards stated that the plans show how the drainage pipes flow from the golf course and from the community into the centralized retention areas. Board member Booker asked if there is an issue of the golf course maintenance itself. Mr. Edwards stated that there is no issue about the golf course maintenance. Board member Holt stated that there is a code violation but the question is who is going to fix it. He stated that it is not the Board's place to get this property into compliance. He stated that he finds Mr. Roper's evidence not compelling as to the burden of responsibility being shifted and he believes that the burden falls on both parties. Board member Carter stated that the system is going to get worse the longer the violation exists and it's going to cost more money to correct the situation the longer the violation exists. 6 CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 Chairman Purvis asked if any of the stockholders live in Summit Greens. Mr. Edwards stated that he believes there are stockholders who are homeowners in Summit Greens. Mr. Roper requested 90 days for SRGC and the HOA to try to resolve the dispute and come to an agreement to bring the property into compliance. Board member Booker stated that he feels 90 days is excessive for compliance. Board member Holt stated that he agrees 90 days is excessive. Tom Maibach, 2808 Highland View Circle, stated that he sat in with the mediation and it was stated that SRGC would maintain the golf course and the retention ponds along with the infrastructure included within the golf course. He stated that the HOA would care for the infrastructure along the streets to the front of the subdivisions. Dave Holt made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a fine of $250 per day if not complied bv October 18, 2011; seconded by Les Booker. The motion fails due to the vote being 3 -3, Board member Mannella did not vote. Les Booker made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a fine of $250 per day if not complied bv November 15, 2011; seconded bv Chandra Myers. The vote was 5 -1 in favor of finding the Respondent in violation with the fine and date with Board member Forte opposing due to lack of proof of responsibility and Board member Mannella did not vote. CASE NO. 11 -765 Richard L. Pooley 944 Linden St. Clermont, FL 34711 LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 944 Linden St., Clermont, FL 34711 VIOLATION: Chapter 14, Section 14 -9 (302.1, 307.1); IPMC City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. The Respondent was not present. Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea, stated that she was sworn in, exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced sections of the International Property Maintenance Code, City of Clermont Code of Ordinances, due to the following: There is a large amount of buckets, furniture, pots, chairs, toys, bikes, and other miscellaneous items located in the front yard. These items are not permitted to be left out on a permanent basis. Furthermore, garage sales are only permitted for a period of 48 hours in duration, two times a year. These items have been out for at least six days. (Sec 307.1 — 7 CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 Accumulation of Rubbish or Garbage, 302.1 - Sanatation). Action required to correct violations: Permanently remove all items from the front yard and store in an appropriate location not visible to the public. Dave Holt made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with no fine assessed at this time, seconded by Les Booker. The vote was unanimous in favor of finding the Respondent in violation with no fine. CASE NO. 11 -766 Rolande A. Darius & Cherubin Jules 2920 White Magnolia Loop Clermont, FL 34711 LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 2920 White Magnolia Loop, Clermont, FL 34711 VIOLATION: Chapter 58, Section 58 -116; Failure to Obtain Business Tax License City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. The Respondent was not present. Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea, stated that she was sworn in, exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to your failure to obtain a local business tax receipt for your business, Promised Land Trucking Inc., which operates from 2920 White Magnolia Loop, Clermont, FL 34711. Compliance of this violation will be when the required payment of $30.00 is paid at the Planning & Zoning Department at city hall. AlfredMannella made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a fine of $150 per day if not complied by October 3, 2011; seconded by Ed Carter The motion failed due to the vote being 2 -5 with Board members Holt, Booker, Forte, Myers and Purvis opposing. David Holt made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a fine of $25 per day if not complied by October 3, 2011; seconded by Carter. The vote was 5 -2 in favor of finding the Respondent in violation with the fine and date with Board members Booker and Purvis opposing. CASE NO. 11 -771 Lyndon & Gillian Alleyne 611 Scott Street Clermont, FL 34711 LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 611 Scott Street, Clermont, FL 34711 VIOLATION: Chapter 34, Sections 34 -61 (1); Unlawful Maintenance of Nuisances City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. 8 CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 The Respondent was not present. Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to the overgrowth of tall grass, weeds in excess of 18 inches. Compliance of this violation will be when the entire premises have been completely cleaned of all excess vegetation, underbrush and weeds, and all debris and garbage removed from the property. Ken Forte made a motion to find the Respondent in repeat violation of the cited City code with a fine of $250 per day for every day in violation past August 26, 2011. Motion fails due to lack of a second. Chairman Purvis passed the gavel to Vice -Chair Dave Holt. Jim Purvis made a motion to find the Respondent in repeat violation of the cited City code with a fine of $100 per day for every day in violation past September 23, 2011; seconded by Alfred Mannella. The vote was unanimous in favor of finding the Respondent in repeat violation and amount of the fine. CASE NO. 11 -772 Irene Dantley & Shekilla Perry 328 Chestnut St. Clermont, FL 34711 LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 328 Chestnut St., Clermont, FL 34711 VIOLATION: Chapter 14 Section 14 -9 (302.1)(304.2); IPMC City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. The Respondent was not present. Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced sections of the International Property Maintenance Code, City of Clermont Code of Ordinances, due to the following: The fence is in disrepair, with numerous panels lying on the ground. (Section 304.2 Protective Treatment - Fences). Compliance of this violation will be when the following conditions are met: The fence panels must be repaired, or the fence removed. Dave Holt made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a fine of $50 per day for every day in violation past September 30, 2011; seconded by Alfred Mannella. The vote was unanimous in favor of finding the Respondent in violation and amount of the fine. 9 CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 CASE NO. 11 -773 Owadram Pooran Brogden Dr. & Lakeview Ave. Clermont, FL 34711 LOCATION OF VIOLATION: Brogden Dr. & Lakeview Ave., Clermont, FL 34711 VIOLATION: Chapter 34, Sections 34 -61 (1); Unlawful Maintenance of Nuisances City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. The Respondent was not present. Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to the overgrowth of tall grass and weeds in excess of 18 inches on the lot. Compliance of this violation will be when the entire premises have been returned to a condition met with custom and usual maintenance, completely clean of all excess vegetation, uniformly trimmed and mowed, with all clippings removed from the property. Dave Holt made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with no fine assessed at this time; seconded by Les Booker The vote was unanimous in favor of finding the Respondent in violation with no fine. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:41 p.m. Jam = Purvis, Chair an Attest: Rae Chidlow, Code Enforcement Clerk 10 FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS LAST NAME -FIRST NAME - MIDDLE NAME NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE /Y1 R N N CG LA- A / Fg &'. g. C'lea.aJaa L00% E'./Fa MAILING ADDft� S � ^ y P'C�G� �� THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON 55 /7 WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF CITY COUNTY ❑CITY ❑ COUNTY '®OTHER LOCAL AGENCY C/ EQ /aJ 4DifJ -0 • NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED 4 $'v/,l� // 8o� - MY POSITION IS 91 ZD1pZ.fD 51 ELECTIVE ❑ APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112 3143, Florida Statutes Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his or her special private gain or loss Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea- sure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained), to the special private gain or Toss of a relative, or to the special private gain or loss of a business associate Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec 163 356 or 163 357, F S , and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father -in -law, mother -in -law, son -in -law, and daughter -in -law A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange) ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting, and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min- utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN • You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes (Continued on other side) APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) • A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency • The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING • You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating • You must complete'tfie form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed a � DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST 1, f/ , fgb, / I W/ t} � C 44 /) , hereby disclose that on e , ( , 20 / / (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) al inured to my special pnvate gain or loss, inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, inured to the special gain or loss of , by whom I am retained, or inured to the special gain or loss of , which is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows / 4 ,4 &A/ ,4- d3a Date Filed Signa L- NOTICE UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112 317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000 CE FORM 8B - EFF 1/2000 PAGE 2