02-21-2012 CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
FEBRUARY 21, 2012
The regular meeting of the Code Enforcement Board was called to order on Tuesday, February
21, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. Members attending were Chairman Jim Purvis, along with Board members
Ken Forte, Alfred Mannella, Dave Holt, Thomas Gorgone, and Chandra Myers. Also attending
were Curt Henschel, City Planner, Suzanne O'Shea, Code Enforcement Officer, Allen LaClair,
Water Conservation Coordinator /Code Enforcement Officer, Dan Mantzaris, City Attorney,
Valerie Fuchs, Code Enforcement Board Attorney and Rae Chidlow, Administrative Assistant.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
Code Enforcement Board Attorney swore in new Board member Tom Gorgone.
The minutes from the Code Enforcement Board meeting of January 17, 2012 were approved as
amended.
Code Enforcement Chairman Jim Purvis read the Opening Remarks.
Code Enforcement Officers Suzanne O'Shea and Allen LaClair, along with any of the public
who may testify, were sworn in.
Chairman Jim Purvis gave the floor to Code Enforcement Staff and City Attorney.
CASE NO. 12 -801
Dwarkanand & Kay Mahanand
470 W. Hwy. 50
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 470 W. Hwy. 50, Clermont, FL 34711
VIOLATION: Chapter 118, Section 118 -35; Maintenance and Pruning
City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case.
The Respondent was present.
Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea, who was sworn in, exhibited pictures that are a true
and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation
summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section
of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to the severe trimming of two oak trees in front
of the property along, Highway 50. Severely trimmed shall mean the cutting of the branches
and/or trunk of a tree in a manner which will substantially reduce the overall size of the tree area
so as to destroy the existing symmetncal appearance or natural shape of the tree in a manner
which results in the removal of the main lateral branches, leaving the trunk of the tree with a stub
appearance. Compliance of this violation will be when the following is completed in its entirety:
Two preferred canopy trees are replaced in lieu of the ones that have been affected. The trees
1
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
FEBRUARY 21, 2012
must individually meet at least the following criteria: 65 gallon container, 12 feet in height in
overall height immediately after planting, 6 foot spread, 3 caliper, FL Grade 1 or better. The
trees must be replaced in close proximity to the affected trees, and not elsewhere on the property.
The trees must be from the preferred tree list.
Ram Ramphal Misir, 1821 Sunset Ridge Dr. Mascott, stated that the trees have always been
maintained in a beautiful manner for the past 12 years. He stated that he has pruned these trees
in this manner every year.
Board member Ken Forte stated that these trees have been being pruned for 12 years now and it
has just now come up as a violation. He stated that it seems the property owner is doing what he
has been doing for the past 12 years and he would be hard pressed to vote this as a violation.
Chairman Jim Purvis stated that he shares his concern about the history but the fact is there is a
violation.
Board member Al Mannella stated that the city required the homeowner's in Kings Ridge to
prune their trees in front of the homes so he has a problem with the whole presentation.
Board member Holt stated that this is a difficult violation because the City's timeline to cite this
property.
Board member Chandra Myers stated that she agrees with the others but then she see's that it is a
violation according to the ordinances.
Board member Tom Gorgone stated that his knowledge of trees throughout the City he does not
see these trees as pleasing. He stated that these trees are over pruned and the one is lopsided. He
stated that this tree has been topped and has not been allowed to grow upwards. He stated that
the owner may have been doing this for 12 years but he needs to stop pruning the tree and allow
it to grow as it should.
Chairman Jim Purvis recommended finding the Respondent in violation so that in the event he
does prune the trees again he can be found in repeat violation. He stated that he would be
comfortable with a flat dollar fine of $50 or $100 rather than an accruing fine.
Alfred Mannella made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a
fine of $50 and to not trim the trees in order to allow them to grow; seconded by Ken Forte. The
vote was unanimous in favor offending the Respondent in violation with the fine and requirement
to not trim the trees.
2
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
FEBRUARY 21, 2012
CASE NO. 12 -804
Masthead, LLC.
Land on Masthead Blvd. to Grand Hwy.
Clermont, Fl 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: Land on Masthead Blvd. to Grand Hwy., Clermont, FL 34711
REPEAT VIOLATION: Chapter 14 Sections 14 -9 (302 4); 2006 IPMC- Excessive weed and
plant growth
City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case.
The Respondent was present.
Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea, who was sworn in, exhibited pictures that are a true
and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation
summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section
of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to the property currently being overgrown with
tall grass and weeds in excess of 18 inches. Compliance of this violation will be when all of
these vacant lots have been returned to a condition met with custom and usual maintenance,
clean of all dead, dying, and/or excess vegetation, uniformly trimmed and mowed, including the
street right -of -way to the pavement. Additionally the hill and the fence line along Grand
Highway should be suitably trimmed.
Nasha Hooda, 535 Julie Lane, Winter Spnngs, stated that he was happy to work with the City
and take care of whatever needs to be done. He stated that there is quite a slope on this property
and the reason why he lets the grass grow on the slope is to prevent erosion.
Todd Powell, 225 Temple Ave., Fern Park, issued a work order to maintain the property in 2005.
He stated that it was well over grown at the time. He stated that there is a thirty feet birm that he
can't take a riding mower on and it has to be weed eat. He stated that he has renegotiated with
the property owner because it took 2 days, 3 men with 3 weed eaters in order to cut the whole
hillside. He stated that he went out on Sunday and mowed the grass and weed eat around the
fence inside the fence. He stated he did not get to the hillside because it is going to take more
man power and time to complete.
Board member Ken Forte asked if the birm could be sprayed.
Mr. Powell stated that might be his next move if he's ordered to do so.
Board member Tom Gorgone stated that this birm is no different in grade then along the
highways. He stated that the State has planted a vegetation that does not grow like the grass and
weeds on this property. He stated to keep this from being a reoccurring event he would cut this
down and seek the advice from the State in agriculture as to what product they use or plant Bahia
grass there.
3
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
FEBRUARY 21, 2012
Chairman Jim Purvis suggested tabling this case for a month to give the Respondent time to
come up with a remedy for the violation.
City attorney Dan Mantzaris stated that if the Board wants to give them additional time, that's
fine but Staff wants the order issued as a violation tonight and not table the case. He stated the
Board can issue the order and allow them 60 days to find a remedy. He stated that the
Respondent's last fine of $250 has not been paid at this time.
Mr. Hooda stated he was not aware of the $250 fine and he would be happy to pay the fine.
Tom Gorgone made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a
fine of $50 per day from January 27, 2012 until complied; seconded by Dave Holt. The vote was
5-1 in favor of finding the Respondent in violation with the fine and date with Chairman Jim
Purvis opposing.
CASE NO. 11 -767
SRGC, LLC & Summit Greens
Residents Assn. Various Retention areas and Stormwater systems located on Sanctuary Ridge
Golf Course, Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION Residents Assn. Various Retention areas and Stormwater
systems located on Sanctuary Ridge Golf Course, Clermont, FL 34711
REQUEST: Request for Forgiveness
City Attorney Dan Mantzans introduced the case and stated the property is in compliance. He
stated that a fine of $20,250 has accrued due to the violation. The Respondent is now asking for
forgiveness. He stated that the City has spent a considerable amount of time on this matter and
recommends a fine of $1000.
Terry Stemcker 2942 Aspen Peak Ct., was sworn in. He stated that he is currently the President
of the HOA Board and as the President his only reasonable and responsible thing to do is to ask
for full forgiveness.
Board member Al Mannella stated that he is on the Board of the HOA and he will not be voting
on this issue.
Ken Forte made a motion to dismiss this case with no fine and if either party separate or
together comes before the Board again for a potential violation, that violation should not be
considered a second offense.
Code Enforcement Board attorney Valerie Fuchs stated that it is not proper protocol to dismiss
the violation at this time. She stated that the Board has already found the Respondents in
4
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
FEBRUARY 21, 2012
violation and the order has already been put into place. She stated that the Board can forgive the
fine, but can't dismiss the case.
Ken Forte amended the motion to forgive the fine and if either party separate or together comes
before the Board again for a potential violation, that violation should not be considered a second
offense.
Code Enforcement Board attorney Valerie Fuchs stated that the Board can't limit to future acts
of a case because it could be a whole new Board that may hear future cases.
Board member Dave Holt stated that the motion is out of order and requests a ruling on that.
Ms. Fuchs stated that the motion is out of order because you can't bind future Boards.
Chairman Jim Purvis passed the gavel. He stated that he agrees with Mr. Forte and this case
should have never come before the Code Enforcement Board to start with.
Board member Dave Holt stated that the City did expend a lot of effort to get this property
complied. He stated that a $1000 fine is not an undue burden to these types of organizations. He
stated that some type of fine should be assessed.
Chairman Jim Purvis made a motion to give full forgiveness with no fine assessed; seconded by
Ken Forte. The vote was 3 -2 in favor of full forgiveness, with Board member Dave Holt and
Tom Gorgone opposing and Al Mannella not participating in the vote.
CASE NO. 12 -802
Lindenhurst Realty Group, Inc.
998 E. Hwy. 50
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 998 E. Hwy. 50, Clermont, FL 34711
VIOLATION: Chapter 102, Section 102 -3; 102 -24; 102 -15; Removal of Unlawful Signs,
Nonconforming signs and Permitted signs.
City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. He requested that this case be tabled to the
May 15, 2012 meeting.
Dave Holt made a motion to table Case No. 12 -802 to the May 15, 2012 meeting; seconded by
Chandra Myers. The vote was unanimous in favor to table the case.
5
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
FEBRUARY 21, 2012
CASE NO. 12 -803
Alexander T. Gimon & Patricia M. Lee
628 W. Minneola Ave.
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 628 W. Minneola Ave., Clermont, FL 34711
VIOLATION: Chapter 14, Section 14 -9( 302.4)( 302 .1)(302.8)(304.2)(304.6)(308.1)
(304.10) (304.12)(307.1)(504.1)(704 2) 2006 IPMC
City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case.
The Respondent was not present.
Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea, who was sworn in, exhibited pictures that are a true
and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation
summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section
of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to the following: Weeds and grass in excess of
18 inches in height. (Section 302.4 - Weeds). Accumulation of thick underbrush below trees,
extreme overgrowth of bushes, broken limbs and branches, and various debris around the
property. (Section 302.4 weeds, Section 302.5 Rodent Harborage, Section 302.1 Sanitation).
Expired, disabled car in front yard bearing tag expiring in 2010. (Section 302.8 Motor Vehicles).
There is a rotted overhang located at the west side entrance door (Section 304.2 Protective
Treatment). Holes in the building (Section 304.6 Exterior Walls). Squirrels live in the attic space,
and visible rodent feces in upstairs unit. (Section 308.1 Infestation). Awnings around the
building with holes, falling, and rotted. (Section 304.2 Protective Treatment). The front upper
level deck lacks safety noted in unsupported hand rail, rotted boards, and unapproved flooring.
(Section 304.10 Stairways, decks, and Porches, Section 304.12 Handrails and Guards). Located
in the rear of property there is a carport area with miscellaneous debris. Including but not limited
to: appliances, tarps, jet skis, chairs, wood, concrete, etc (Section 304.1 Accumulation of
Rubbish or Garbage). In the upstairs unit's kitchen, there is water stained ceiling that leaks.
(Section 504.1 General). No smoke detectors in upstairs unit. (Section 704.2 Smoke Alarms).
Compliance of this violation will be when all of the premises have met the following conditions:
Cut all weeds and grass below 18 inches. Cut and clean around all trees and bushes, branches
and tree limbs, in addition to removing all miscellaneous debris and refuse from the property.
Remove all disabled, unregistered vehicles from the property. Repair the overhang and all rotted
boards by west side door. Repair all holes and awnings around the building so rodents and rain
cannot enter. Either remove the upper floor balcony and secure the door to the outside per the
building official or hire a licensed structural engineer to certify the balcony is safe, or rebuild the
balcony to meet current code (which includes zoning and building approval through the City if
Clermont.) Repair the water stained ceiling in the kitchen, and address all area of possible leak.
(Section 504.1 General). Install smoke detectors on wall or ceiling of each bedroom, and outside
each bedroom. (Section 704.2 Smoke Alarms).
6
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
FEBRUARY 21, 2012
Dave Holt made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a fine of
$250 per day if not complied by March 21, 2012; seconded by Chandra Myers. The vote was
unanimous in favor of finding the Respondent in violation with the fine and date.
CASE NO. 12 -805
William & Renee Banzhaf
790 W. Minneola Avenue
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 790 W. Minneola Avenue, Clermont, FL 34711
VIOLATION: Chapter 122, Section 122 -343 (d) & 122 -344; Outside Display & No Sign Permit
City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case.
The Respondent was not present.
Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea, who was sworn in, exhibited pictures that are a true
and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation
summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section
of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to the following: Merchandise is being
displayed in the right -of -way in front of the businesses. Additionally, the merchandise exceeds
the 25 percent of the retail store width or 10 feet in width, whichever is less. No permit for the
additional signage on the building, located to the right of the front door. Compliance of this
violation will be when the following is completed in its entirety: Remove all items from the right
of way in front of the businesses (the grass area), and limit merchandise to 25 percent of the
retail store width or 10 feet in width, whichever is less. Remove the sign from the front of the
store, or permit it.
Ken Forte made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with no fine
assessed at this time and seconded by Alfred Mannella. The vote was unanimous in favor of
finding the Respondent in violation.
CASE NO. 12 -806
Luz Rodriguez
Vacant Commercial Lot on Hwy. 27, North of E. Montrose St.
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: Vacant Commercial Lot on Hwy. 27, North of E Montrose St.,
Clermont, FL 34711
VIOLATION: Chapter 14, Section 14 -9 (302.4); 2006 IPMC - Overgrowth of grass and weeds
City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case.
7
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
FEBRUARY 21, 2012
The Respondent was not present.
Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea, who was sworn in, exhibited pictures that are a true
and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation
summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced sections
of the International Property Maintenance Code, City of Clermont Code of Ordinances, due to
the following: There is an extreme overgrowth of weeds and grass on the property. (Section
302.4 Weeds). Compliance of this violation will be when the following conditions are met: All
weeds and grass cut below 18 inches, uniformly trimmed, and all vegetative debris removed
from the property.
Dave Holt made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a fine of
$250 per day if not complied by March 20, 2012; seconded by Alfred Mannella The vote was
unanimous in favor of finding the Respondent in violation with the fine and date.
CASE NO. 12 -807
•
Orange Bank of Florida
516 W. Hwy. 50
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 516 W. Hwy: 50, Clermont, FL 34711
VIOLATION: Chapter 102, Section 102 -3 (b)(3)(g), Enforcement; Removal of Unlawful Signs,
Chapter 102, Section 102 -24 (a)(b)(5)(8), Nonconforming Signs
City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. He stated that this case has complied and will
not be heard:
Chairman Jim Purvis passed the gavel. He stated that the City of Clermont, Fl is served by a
volunteer group of residents: known as the Code Enforcement Board of the City of Clermont,
FL. Those that serve on this Board do so of their free will and considerable donation of time.
Many have served in this Board with little, or no recognition or acknowledgement of the service
by the City Council, Staff, or general public. Many of those that have served this Board in the
past are still either residents of the city or their current location is known to staff.
Chairman Jim Purvis made a motion to direct staff to formulate and distribute to each known
last address or new address a letter of Thanks and Recognition for Service to all persons having
served on the Board for the past ten years. The content of the communication is to personally
thank each of those persons for their time, effort, diligence, and commitment to fulfilling their
responsibilities as a member of the Clermont, FL Code Enforcement Board and wishing them
well in their current endeavors. The said letter is to be executed on behalf of the City by the
manager Wayne Saunders; Alfred Mannella seconded.
8
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
FEBRUARY 21, 2012
Board member Dave Holt stated that he likes the thought of the letter but he does not believe the
Board can't direct the City Manager to do the letter, but they could request the City Manager to
provide the letter.
City attorney Dan Mantzaris stated that he recognizes the motion as a request.
The motion was amended to a request rather than to direct staff by Jim Purvis and Alfred
Mannella. The vote was unanimous an favor of the letter being provided by City Manager.
Chandra Myers nominated Dave Holt as Chairman and Alfred Mannella as Vice - Chairman;
seconded by Tom Gorgone. The vote was unanimous in favor of the Chairman and Vice -
Chairman.
Jim Purvis stated that he is handing in his letter of resignation.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m.
Dave Holt, Vice - Chairman
Attest:
Rae Chidlow, Code Enforcement Clerk
9
FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LAST NAME —FIRST NAME — MIDDLE NAME NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE
47A- 414/4114- 41p €G2 S• d o/OE cd reze in Atli
MAILING O RES / / rHE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON
99 47 E, 4 v "rld el WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF
Worry ❑ COUNTY DOTHER LOCAL AGENCY
a /l ee Appdi � � NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION
DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED MY POSITION IS
2 - — Z/— c — / ❑ ELECTIVE om APPOINTIVE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council,
commission, authority, or committee It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting
conflict of interest under Section 112 3143, Florida Statutes
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position Foi this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
inures to his or her :special private gain or loss Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea-
sure 1/vhich inures to he spc :. ! gain or'ccc of a pr;rc:pw' (oth r than a government agen^v) by whom he or she is retained (including the
parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained), to the special private gain or loss of a relative, or
to the special private gain or Toss of a business associate Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163 356 or
163 357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that
capacity
For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father -in -law,
mother -in -law, son -in -law, and daughter -in -law A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business
enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation
are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you
are abstaining from voting, and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min-
utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters However, you
must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made
by you or at your direction
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE
TAKEN
• You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the
minutes'of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes (Continued on other side)
APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) --
• A copy,of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency ;
-•- The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is.filed.. __ ____ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ `i' \ g
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING , l' ,
' - ., f_ __ �__,_ ____ ___.� _ ____ _ _ __ _ _ _
You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in thepeasure before participating , '
-•- You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote Occurs with the person - responsible for recordmgthe minutes "of the, r
_ meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes A copy of the form must be provided immediateiy,to,the other members of the
agency, and the form must be read pubhciy et the next meeting after the form _w_ is filed - - - -- - - - - ` — ` - - `
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
'1, /e'er --a x�x --sv �I i¢bl/i ie44 - " -- ne'reby disclose that on - ‘ $- $6: t ea- e " _ ' , ' - 20 /4, 1
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) • - ' „ : ' r r ')r - ' ,
0 inured to my special prorate gain or loss; I i
! - - - inured to the gain Toss of my business associate,,0 r_ o f _ t' ,
, , , fir, . <
inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, .'`' _ . - , . - , ' J J
inured to the special gain or loss of , by
whom I am retained, or `- - __ _____ ____._ _____ _ ____ _ ___ ___ _____ __
inured to the special gain or loss of - - - - ' - - - _ , which
' ` '' ` '
is the parent organization or of a principal which has retained me F ', - " , - ■ , '
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows , _ _
i / , _
1
' /� _ - ;
_ > ; ?�i � r ��' ! % '_ ,...:r
�
) , � ll //
- €
x
1 1
,
) 2/c- iiic,e)16 A '. Z,..,.... _
Date Filed Sign' re _
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE
CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING' IMPEACHMENT,
REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A'
■ CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000. '
1 'CE FORM 8B - EFF 1/2000 _ ' PAGE 2