R-2017-12 CITY OF CLERMONT
RESOLUTION NO. 2017-12
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESPONDING TO THE
REQUEST TO AMEND THE INTERLOCAL SERVICE BOUNDARY
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GROVELAND, CITY OF
CLERMONT, TOWN OF HOWEY-IN-THE-HILLS, CITY OF LEESBURG,
CITY OF MASCOTTE, CITY OF MINNEOLA, AND LAKE COUNTY AS TO
THE CITY OF GROVELAND; PROVIDING FOR RECORDING; PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Legislature adopted Part II of Chapter 171, Florida Statutes as an
alternative for local governments regarding annexation of real property into a municipality; and
WHEREAS, in part, the intent of the Legislature is to "encourage intergovernmental
coordination in planning, service delivery, and boundary adjustments"; and
WHEREAS, by its Resolution 2010-10, adopted May 11, 2010, the City of Clermont
requested to participate in the negotiation process set forth in Section 171.203, Florida Statutes;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Clermont, Florida, as follows:
SECTION 1.
The City of Clermont desires to participate in the amendment to the Interlocal Service
Boundary Agreement with Lake County, the City of Groveland, the City of Minneola,
the City of Mascotte, the Town of Howey-in-the-Hills, and the City of Leesburg as to the
City of Groveland, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A.
SECTION 2.
This Resolution shall be recorded in the Public Records of Lake County, Florida and copies
hereof shall be provided to Lake County, the City of Groveland, the City of Minneola, the City
of Mascotte, the Town of Howey-in-the-Hills, and the City of Leesburg.
SECTION 3.
This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
1
CITY OF CLERMONT
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-22
DONE AND RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Clermont, Lake County,
Florida, this 28th day of February, 2017.
CITY OF CLERMONT
.y'M
,ter y r Gail L. Ash, Ma or
t yk
, ATTEST.
tir rsls -
Tracy Ackro • Howe, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
•
D T ,- . -
AMENDMENT TO INTERLOCAL
SERVICE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
The City of Groveland, City of Clermont,
Town of Howey-in-the-Hills,
City of Leesburg, City of Mascotte,
City of Minneola, and Lake County
AS TO THE CITY OF GROVELAND
South Lake ISBA Amendment as to Groveland Page 1
AMENDMENT TO INTERLOCAL SERVICE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF GROVELAND, CITY OF CLERMONT, TOWN
OF HOWEY-IN-THE-HILLS, CITY OF LEESBURG, CITY OF
MASCOTTE, CITY OF MINNEOLA, AND LAKE COUNTY
AS TO THE CITY OF GROVELAND
This Amendment to the Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement as to the City of
GROVELAND is made by and between the Cities of GROVELAND,CLERMONT,LEESBURG,
MASCOTTE, and MINNEOLA, and TOWN OF HOWEY-IN-THE-HILLS, all of which are
Florida municipalities (collectively referred to as "Cities" and individually as "Mascotte",
"Groveland","Clermont ,"Minneola","Howey-in-the-Hills",and"Leesburg"),and Lake County,
a political subdivision of the State of Florida(the"County").
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, Florida municipalities possess Municipal Home Rule Powers pursuant to
Article VIII, Section 2(b) of the Florida Constitution and Section 166.021,Florida Statutes.
WHEREAS, the County possesses Home Rule powers pursuant to Article VIII, Section
'1(b), of the Florida Constitution and Section 125.01,Florida Statutes.
WHEREAS,the stated purpose of the Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act of 1969, Section
163.01, Florida Statutes, is to "permit local governmental units to make the most efficient use of
their powers by enabling them to cooperate with other localities on a basis of mutual advantage
and thereby to provide services and facilities in a manner and pursuant to forms of governmental
organization that will accord best with geographic, economic, population, and other factors
influencing the needs and development of local communities:"
WHEREAS,the principal goal of the Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement Act Section
171.20, Florida.Statutes is to "encourage local governments to jointly determine how to provide
services to residents and property in the most efficient and effective manner while balancing the
needs and desires of the community." It is also intended to provide "a more flexible process for
adjusting municipal boundaries and to address a wider range of the effects of annexation" . . . "to
encourage intergovernmental g g ernmental coordination in planning, service delivery, and boundary
adjustments and to reduce intergovernmental conflicts and litigation between local governments"
"to promote sensible boundaries that reduce the costs of local governments, avoid duplicating
local services, and increase political transparency and accountability" . . . and "to prevent
inefficient service delivery and an insufficient tax base to support the delivery of those services."
WHEREAS, in 2013, Cities and County entered into an Interlocal Service Boundary
Agreement (the "Agreement"), in order to specifically identify lands deemed logical for future
annexations into Cities and land to remain unincorporated ("Unincorporated Service Area").
WHEREAS, subsequent to the parties entering into the Agreement, Groveland entered
into a separate,Itwenty year agreement with County for provision of automatic aid to one another
for fire and emergency services; and
South Lake ISBA Amendment as to Groveland Page 2
WHEREAS, accordingly, Cities and County wish to amend the Agreement as to
Groveland, in order to expand Groveland's annexation abilities under the Agreement, and permit
Groveland to annex lands noncontiguous to its boundaries, with the consent of the property
owner(s), and provided that Groveland meets one of two conditions regarding the provision of
central water and/or sewer service to the annexing property.
WHEREAS, Cities and County find that the benefits of intergovernmental
communications and coordination will accrue to all Parties.
WHEREAS, this Amendment to the Agreement is entered into pursuant to the authority
of Article VIII of the Florida Constitution and Chapters 125.01, 163.3177, 166.021 and 171.203,
190.011,Florida Statutes (2015).
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein and in the
Agreement, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree to
amend the Agreement as to Groveland as follows:
1. RECITALS. The above recitals are true and correct and, by this reference, are hereby
incorporated into and made an integral part of this Amendment to the Agreement.
2. AMENDMENT TO PARAGRAPH 3, "ANNEXATIONS", AS TO GROVELAND.
Paragraph 3 of the Agreement, entitled "Annexations", is hereby deleted and replaced with the
following as to the City of Groveland only:
The following shall govern any annexations by Groveland that occur within the Interlocal
Service Agreement Boundary as displayed on Exhibit A to the Agreement.
a. Designated Municipal Areas. Areas on the map which are not designated as
unincorporated areas are attributed as future annexation areas for individual Cities.
No part of an area which is designated as a future annexation area for one City shall
be annexed by any other City for the duration of this agreement, unless the City
which was designated to annex that area and the Board of County Commissioners
consent to such specific annexation in writing.
b. Annexations Within Designated Municipal Areas. Annexations by Groveland
within Groveland's designated municipal area shall be subject to the following:
i. Part I Chapter 171, Florida Statutes. City shall be entitled to annex any
property in a manner which is consistent with Part I, Chapter 171, Florida
Statutes.
South Lake ISBA Amendment as to Groveland Page 3
ii. Enclaves. Pursuant to §171.046,Florida Statutes, County hereby consents
to the annexation of any enclave or the creation of any enclave which is the
result of an annexation, so long as City agrees to provide services to such
enclave, and the City holds public hearing prior to such annexation where
the owners of all properties within the enclave are given written, first class
mail notice, and an opportunity to continent publicly at such meeting.
Annexation. of Properties Which,Do Not Meet Part I, Chapter 171,
Florida Statutes. County hereby consents to the annexation by Groveland
of any non-contiguous real property in the unincorporated area within the
Interlocal Service Boundary Area as depicted in Exhibit A to the Agreement,
provided that the property owner(s) consent to the annexation, and the
subject property to be annexed is:
a. Presently served by City water,and/or sewer utilities; or
b. Subject to a concurrent water and sewer utility agreement that the
property owner/developer has entered into at the time of annexation,
requiring connection to either the City's water or sewer utility
system, or both if required by the City's comprehensive plan, and
provided further that the City shall not approve any development,or
issue a final development order of such annexed property unless
either central water or sewer, or both, shall serve the development.
The utility agreement shall further provide that if connection is only
to one utility at the time of development, that the property must
connect to the remaining utility when available.
iv. Annexation of Right of Way. County agrees that it will not oppose the
annexation of right of way located in the Interlocal Service Boundary
Agreement area of a City, so long as at least one.side of the road will be
bounded by property located within the City after the annexation, or which
meets any of the otherannexation requirements of this Agreement. City
agrees that at the time that it annexes any property which abuts a roadway,
that, to the extent possible, it will also annex the adjacent road right of way
to avoid-the creation ofroadway enclaves. Annexing the right of way
pursuant tothis sub-paragraph iv. does not require City to accept
maintenance responsibility for such road.
South Lake ISBA Amendment as to Groveland Page 4
3. AMENDMENT TO PARAGRAPH 6,"FIRE HYDRANTS",AS TO GROVELAND.
Paragraph 6 ofthe Agreement, currently entitled "Fire Hydrants", is hereby deleted and replaced
with the following as to the City of Groveland only:
FIRE RESCUE SERVICES AND FIRE HYDRANTS. The Interlocal Agreement (the
"Interlocal Agreement")between The'City of Groveland.and Lake County relating to Fire and Emergency
•Medical Services,dated January 16,2014,is hereby terminated,and as to fire and rescue services,the City
of Groveland and Lake County hereby agree to the following:
a. COUNTY and GROVELAND agree to automatically respond to assist the other for all
types of emergencies including fire, medical emergencies, rescue, hazardous material,
extrication,and natural and accidental disasters within the ISBA area,as well as in adjacent
areas pursuant to Section(d)below. The provisions of this agreement do not apply to non-
emergency calls',as defined in vii.below.
i. The parties agree to provide such assistance on an automatic aid basis utilizing the
available units nearest to the incident.
ii. This agreement is not intended and shall not be construed to in any way deprive
COUNTY or GROVELAND of any jurisdictional powers that such entity may
have, nor is it the intention of the parties to combine their individual departments
into a single department or district providing the services encompassed by this
agreement.
iii. For purpose of this agreement, automatic aid shall be defined as the immediate
(response of_emergency personnel closest to the scene, regardless of whether such
personnel are from the jurisdiction where the incident is located. The automatic
aid shall be based on a predefined process agreed to pursuant to vii. below that
results in the immediate response of emergency personnel to the scene of an
'emergency. COUNTY and GROVELAND shall mutually agree on the level of
(response that different.types;of incidents will require,and units will be dispatched
accordingly. All units of COUNTY and GROVELAND shall be available to be
dispatched, unless involved in another call, if such response is required based on
the necessary level of response that is required.
iv. During the term of this agreement;COUNTY and GROVELAND agree that they
will continue to utilize Lake Emergency Medical Services, Inc. (hereinafter
`LEMS") (or any successor entity approved both by COUNTY and
GROVELAND) for dispatching of fire and emergency medical services.
v. During the term of this agreement, COUNTY and GROVELAND agree that they
will install and maintain Automatic Vehicular Locator Systems (hereinafter
l'AVL") on all emergency response vehicles in their fleets that are located in or
near the ISBA area; such Automatic Vehicular Locator Systems shall be
South-Lake 1SBA Amendment as to'Groveland Page 5
compatible with computer and radio systems maintained by LEMS. COUNTY
agrees to utilize County Fire Impact Fees for the initial purchase of an AVL for
any GROVELAND response vehicle that does not currently have one;
GROVELAND will be responsible to purchase such units for vehicles placed in
Service.after the effective date. GROVELAND and COUNTY will be responsible
for maintenance and operating charges for AVL's on their own vehicles.
vi. While providing automatic response, an entity that is responding outside its
jurisdictionshall be subject to the orders and directions of the officer in charge of
the operations. If an officer for the jurisdiction in which the incident is located is
not available at the scene,.the highest-ranking officer from the responding party
will control the scene.until its termination or an officer from the jurisdiction in
which the incident has occurred arrives and scene control is properly transferred.
COUNTY and GROVELAND shall utilize National Fire Protection Standards and
National Incident Management System (NIMS) standards to ensure that the
Incident Command System, the Personnel Accountability System and other
standards are adhered to.
vii. The Chiefs of the fire departments and.the Executive Director of LEMS or their
designees, will meet,and draft, and may thereafter revise, a written plan for the
procedures and operations necessary to effectively implement this agreement. The
written plan shall include a:definition of non-emergency calls and shall include the
processdescribed in iii.,above. Should a disagreement arise between such Chiefs
and/or Executive Director, the matter shall be referred to the Managers for
COUNTY and GROVELAND for,resolution. Any dispute or disagreement that
cannot be resolved at this level shall be resolved utilizing the dispute resolution
process of this ISBA Agreement.
viii. Nothing in this agreement shall prohibit COUNTY or GROVELAND from
sending additional`- resources to an incident located within their respective
jurisdiction,even if such resources are not required by the plan for procedures and
operations approved by the fire chiefs of COUNTY and GROVELAND.
ix. COUNTY and GROVELAND agree that they will not locate or establish a new
fire station that is located inthe jurisdiction of the other or close a fire station
within the ISBA area without the written permission of the other party
x. Nothing in this agreement shall affect any other mutual aid agreements that are or
may be' in existence between COUNTY and GROVELAND orany other
governmental unit for areas not included within this agreement.
b. It is the intent of this agreement to allocate the costs of an agency responding to an event
in the other's jurisdiction through a method whereby compensation is set based upon the
type of call. At the end of each quarter, the number of calls that COUNTY and
GROVELAND respond to in the other's jurisdiction shall be reviewed, calculated and
compensation shall be paid as follows:
South Lake ISBA Amendment as to Groveland Page 6
i. At the end of each quarter, calls responded to in the other agency's jurisdiction
shall be determined, utilizing call data maintained by the dispatch agency. Only
calls where the, dispatcher dispatched a unit based on the predefined process
described above shall be counted. As indicated earlier, COUNTY or
GROVELAND have the right to send units to a call without being dispatched;
however, in such a case, such call shall not be calculated for purposes of
compensation. For purposes of this provision, "self-dispatched" calls shall be
defined,based on dispatch records,as calls wherein the dispatcher did not call the
unit to the scene.
ii. Determination of compensable calls. The following rules shall be used to
determine how to determine the number of compensable calls:
1. For purposes of medical calls, each vehicle that is dispatched shall be
considered a separate call.
2. For purposes of fire calls, each call for service to an incident shall be
considered one call, regardless of the number of vehicles that are
dispatched.
3. Calls that are dispatched for non-emergency purposes shall not be counted
as a response by COUNTY or GROVELAND for purposes of this
agreement and neither agency shall be required to respond to such non-
emergency call, although,they may respond if they wish.
4. Calls that are self-dispatched meaning responses that are to an incident
where the dispatcher did not call that unit shall not be counted as a
response for purposes of this agreement.
5. Calls that are dispatched due to an automobile accident shall be counted
as a medical call"incident.
6. Additional rules and compensation amounts regarding specific types of
calls may be applied if approved in writing by the City Administrator of
GROVELAND and County Manager of COUNTY.
iii. At the end of each quarter, the number of calls for the prior quarter shall be
reviewed to determine if either COUNTY or GROVELAND responded to more
calls outside their jurisdiction'than were responded to inside their jurisdiction. For
this purpose, separate calculations shall be made for emergency medical response
and fire response. A call which is made by the dispatcher, but subsequently
cancelled shall be calculated as.half('A) of a call. For each category of calls, the
number of calls that one.:party responded to that exceeds the number of calls the
other party responded to shall be the"net number of calls". Only the net number
of calls shall be compensable. By way of illustration, in a quarter if
GROVELAND were to answer fifty (50) calls in COUNTY's jurisdiction, and
COUNTY were to answer forty-five (45) calls in GROVELAND's jurisdiction,
the net five(5)calls would be compensable from COUNTY to GROVELAND.
iv. Net calls shall be compensated in the following amounts:
1. Medical Call: $100 per call.
South Lake ISBA Amendment as to.Groveland" Page 7
2. Fire Call: $500 per call.
c. General Provisions relating to Fire and Medical Services Response:
i. Neither COUNTY nor GROVELAND shall assume any liability for the acts,
omissions, or negligence of the other. Each shall be solely responsible for their
own negligence and the negligence if their employees and agents. Nothing in this
agreement is intended to act as a waiver of sovereign immunity.
ii. Effective date and Redetermination of reimbursement.
1. The effective date for the automatic aid portion of this Amendment to the
Agreement shall be March.1,2014 and this Amendment to the Agreement
shall continue in force and effect unless the Agreement is modified or
terminated as provided in that Agreement.
2. The compensation amounts in (b)(iv) above are estimates that have been
agreed to by COUNTY and GROVELAND. It is also possible that during
the term of this agreement costs may change. Within ninety(90)days after
February 28, 2016, and every three(3) years thereafter on the same date,
should either party believe that such amounts shall be adjusted, they shall
notify the other in writing. Upon such notification, COUNTY and
GROVELAND shall meet to renegotiate such rates. Should a
disagreement arise which cannot be resolved, the matter shall be referred
to the Managers for COUNTY and GROVELAND for resolution. Any
dispute or disagreement that cannot be resolved at this level shall be
resolved utilizing the dispute resolution process of this ISBA Agreement.
d. Additional Parties: There are other governmental units that provide fire and emergency
medical response in areas adjacent to the ISBA area: It is possible that agreements between
COUNTY and one or more of those entities may be negotiated and entered into. In such a
case,it may be of benefit to GROVELAND and COUNTY to incorporate those additional
areas by another amendment to the Agreement in order to provide a seamless emergency
response system. Such an amendment may be made only if agreed to in writing by all of
the parties.
e. In making the determination of amounts due under this agreement, data from LEMS's
dispatch shall be used as the basis to determine the number of calls which are to be counted
as interagency calls. `Within thirty (30) days after the end of each quarter, LEMS will
prepare a report and send it to GROVELAND and COUNTY. GROVELAND and
COUNTY shall have fifteen_ (15)days to review such report, and to object. Should either
party object to the report,or the data contained therein, the COUNTY Manager and City
Manager shall meet within fifteen(15) days to attempt to resolve such objection. Should
the managers be unable to resolve such objection, payment shall be made for the portion
of the report that is not in dispute, and the parties shall select a Certified Professional
Accounting.Firm which shall conduct a review and render a decision on the dispute. The
decision of the Certified Public Accounting Firm shall be final and binding on all parties
South Lake,ISBA,Amendment as to Groveland ` Page 8
to this agreement. The costs of the Certified Accounting Firm shall be borne equally by
COUNTY and GROVELAND.
f. Any payments that are due to another party to this agreement shall be made within twenty-
five (25) days after the`delivery of the report described in Section (e) above, unless an
objectionis filed. 'In such a case, the undisputed portions of the report shall be paid and
the balance shall be due within fifteen(15)days after resolution of the dispute.
g. Fire Hydrants: Cities agree that any time a potable water line is extended into or
through unincorporated areas, that fire hydrants or hydrant stub outs will be
installed at recommended distances forfire hydrant spacing at County's expense.
Cities agree that County shall have the right to have firehydrants installed on any
City water line located in the unincorporated area at County expense. Cities agree
that County Fire Department shall have the right to use any City fire hydrant for
official fire purposes, at no cost; County shall, however, notify City any time such
a hydrant is used along with an estimate of how much water was used. Notification
shall be in writing to.the City:Manager of the respective City and provided within
'seven(7) calendar days of the County's use.
4. EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM. This Amendment to the Agreement shall be
effective upon the date the last party executes it,and thereafter shall remain in effect coterminous
with the Agreement.
5. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Amendment to the Agreement as to Groveland constitutes
the entire understanding of the Parties_with respect to the subject matters addressed herein, and all
prior agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are superseded
by this Amendment to the Agreement.
6. GOVERNING LAW,VENUE AND JURISDICTION: The laws of the State of Florida
shall=govern this Amendment to the Agreement, and venue shall be in Lake County, Florida.
Jurisdiction shall onlybe in the Circuit Court of Lake County, Florida.
7. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this Amendment to the Agreement is declared invalid
or unenforceable, then to the extent it is possible to do so without destroying the overall intent and
effect of this Amendment to the Agreement, the portion deemed invalid or unenforceable shall be
severed here from and the remainder of this.Amendment to the Agreement shall continue in full
force and effect as if it were enacted without including the portion_ found to be invalid or
unenforceable.
8. FULL FORCE AND EFFECT OF OTHER PROVISIONS. All provisions of the
Agreement not specifically amended herein shall remain in full force and effect.
South Lake ISBA Amendment as to Groveland Page 9
Amendment to Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement Between The City of Groveland,City of Clermont,Town of Howey-in-the-Hills,
City of Leesburg,City of Moscone,City.of Minneola,and Lake County,as to the City of Groveland
BOARD OF-COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Timothy I. Sullivan, Chairman
This day of , 2017.
ATTEST:
Neil Kelly, Clerk of the
Board.of County Commissioners
of Lake County, Florida
Approved as to form and legality:
Melanie Marsh;
County Attorney
South Lake ISBAFAmendment as to Groveland Page 10
Amendment to Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement Between The City of Groveland,City of Clermont,Town of Howey-in-the-Hills,
City`ofLeesburg,.CRY of Mascotte,City of Minneola,and Lake County,as to the City of Groveland
CITY OF GROVELAND
Mas$
ThisakiAl yof , 2017.
ATTEST:
City ' lerk
Approved as to form and legality:
atutt.Aiti j2....t.aue/1/4
Anita R. Geraci-Carver, City Attorney
•
•
South Lake1ISBA Amendment as to Groveland Page 11
Amendment to Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement Between The City of Groveland,City of Clermont,Town of Howey-in-the-Hills,
City of Leesburg,City of Mascotte,City of Minneola,and Lake County,as to the City of Groveland
CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA
�� ,
Gail L. Ash,Ma'or
Q
Thio day oak. ,at,, 2017.
ATTEST:
,-/Af
Tracy Ackroyd, o`we, ity Clerk
Approved as • • and legality:
-7
D. ems,.:.: • naris . ey
South Lake ISBA Amendment as to Groveland Page 12
Amendment to Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement Between The City of Groveland,City of Clermont,Town of Howey-in-the-Hills,
City of Leesburg,City of Mascotte,City of Minneola,and Lake County,as to the City of Groveland
CITY OF LEESBURG
Robert Bone, Jr.
Mayor
This day of , 2017.
ATTEST:
J. Andi Purvis, City Clerk
Approved as to form and legality:
Fred Morrison,,City Attorney
South Lake ISB]Amendment as to Groveland Page 14
1 Amendment to Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement Between The City of Groveland,City of Clermont,Town of Howey-in-the-Hills,
2 City of Leesburg,City of Moscotte,City of Mineola,and Lake County,as to the City of Groveland
3
4
5
6 CITY OF MASCOTTE
7
8
9 GG 1,�
10 `�/
11 Barbara Krull, Mayor
12
13
14 This / yof r ,2016.
15
16 ATTEST:
17
18 jaa 19VIM -
r20
21 Michelle Hawkins,City Clerk
22
23
24 Approved as to form and legality:
25
26
27
28
29 Virginiasady, City Attorney •
30
31
15
Amendment to Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement Between The City of Groveland,City of Clermont,Town of Howey-in-the-Hills,
City of Leesburg,City of Mascotte,City of Minneola,and Lake County,as to the City of Groveland
CITY OF MINNEOLA
Pat Kelley
Mayor
This day of , 2017.
ATTEST:
Christina Stidham, City Clerk
Approved as to form and legality:
Scott Gerken, City Attorney
South Lake 1SBAIAniendment as to Groveland Page 16
•
TRACY ACKROYD HOWE, MMC
City Clerk
352-241-7331
Choice of Champions" Tackroyd@clermontfl.org
March 3, 2017
Melanie Marsh, County Attorney
Lake County Attorney Office
315 West Main Street
Tavares, FL 32778
Dear Ms. Marsh:
The Clermont-City Council approved the attached at their regular meeting held on February 28, 2017.
Enclosed is an Original for your records and six separate signature pages requiring execution. Please
return the six signature pages to the City':of Clermont, Office of the City Clerk, 685 W. Montrose Street,
Clermont, FL 34711. A self-addressed stamped envelope is enclosed for your convenience.
A complete document with original signatures will be sent upon receipt from all parties.
Sincerely
Tracy Ackroyd Howe, MMC
City Clerk
685 W. Montrose Street Clermont, FL 34711 - www.ClermontFL.gov
63--
‘,..,,, TRACY ACKROYD HOWE, MMC
0 City Clerk
E.. ,
,-} - -'7 1 ' ill,
i. t
352-241-7331
Choice of:Champions Tackroyd@clermontfl.org
March 3, 2017
Howey-in-the-Hills
Chris Sears, Mayor
101 North Palm Avenue
Howey-in-the-Hills, FL 34737
Dear Mr.Sears:
The Clermont City Council approved the attached at their regular meeting held on February 28, 2017.
Enclosed is an original for your records and six separate signature pages requiring execution. Please
return the six signature,pages to the City of Clermont, Office of the City Clerk, 685 W. Montrose Street,
Clermont, FL 34711. A self-addressed stamped envelope is enclosed for your convenience.
A complete document with original signatures will be sent upon receipt from all parties.
Sincerely,
j, z:
Tracy Ackroyd Howe, MMC
City Clerk
685 W. Montrose Street - Clermont, FL 34711 www.ClermontFL.gov
TRACY ACKROYD HOWE, MMC
d ,i City Clerk
c LE if) 'C)NT.
352-241-7331
Choice ofChampions Tackroyd@clermontfl.org
March 3, 2017
City of Leesburg,
Robert Bone, Mayor
501 West MeadoIw Street
Leesburg, FL 34748
Dear Mr. Bone:
The Clermont City Council approved the attached at their regular meeting held on February 28, 2017.
Enclosed is an Original for your records and six separate signature pages requiring execution. Please
return thesix signature pages to the:City of Clermont, Office of the City,Clerk, 685.W. Montrose Street,
Clermont,FL 34711. A self-addressed;stam"ped envelope.is enclosed for your convenience.
A complete document with original signatures will be sent upon receipt from all parties.
Sincerely,
Tracy Ackroyd Howe, MMC
City Clerk
685 W. Montrose Street Clermont, FL 34711 www.ClermontFL.gov
TRACY ACKROYD HOWE, MMC
d City Clerk
•
1. 352-241-7331
Choice of Champions Tackroyd@clermontfl.org
March 3, 2017
City of Minneola
Pat Kelley, Mayor
800 North U.S. Highway 27
Minneola, FL 34715
Dear Mr. Kelley:
The Clermont City Council approved the attached at their regular meeting held on February 28, 2017.
Enclosed is an original for your records and six separate signature pages requiring execution. Please
return the six signature pages to the City of Clermont, Office of the City Clerk, 685 W. Montrose Street,
Clermont, FL 34711. A self-addressed stamped envelope is enclosed for your convenience.
A complete document with original signatures will be sent upon receipt from all parties.
Sincerely
Tracy Ackroyd Howe, MMC
City Clerk
685 W. Montrose Street - Clermont, FL 34711 www.ClermontFL.gov