07-22-1980 Supporting Documents80-114
80-115
80-110
®
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
July 22, 1980
A Regular. Meeting of the City Council of the City of Clermont
was held in the City Council Chambers on Tuesday, July 22, 1980.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Claude E. Smoak, Jr.. at
7:30 p.m. with the following Councilmen in attendance:
Carlisle Byrd, Lester Cole, Bob Pool and Dennis Thomas. Other
City Officials present were: City Manager Forbes, City Attorney
Baird, Finance Director Saunders and City Clerk Rozar.
The Invocation was offered by Councilman Byrd, followed by
repeating of the Pledge of Allegiance by a].1 present.
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 8, 1980 were approved
as written.
The Minutes of the Special Meeting of July 15, 1980 regarding
Wastewater Alternatives were approved as written.
DUMP -ALL: Bernard Prunier
Mr. Prunier appeared before Council explaining his letter
requesting an increase in rates. City Manager Forbes
spoke, suggesting the City revise Ordinance No. 57-M
issuing nonexclusive contracts, allowing Dump -All to
compete with other garbage collecting companies, rather
than having to vote on every rate change.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN BYRD, SECONDED BY COUNCIL-
MAN THOMAS AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT THE RECOMMENDATION
OF THE CITY MANAGER BE ACCEPTED AND THE NECESSARY CHANGES
BE MADE TO ORDINANCE NO. 57-M. It was clarified that the
City and customers should be notified at least 60 days prior
to a rate change.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
RESOLUTION NO. 351
City Attorney Baird explained this Resolution needed certain
wording changes; not changing the content of the resolution.
The changes were deemed necessary by FmIIA in order to get
the bonds validated.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN BYRD, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN
COLE AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 351 BE
ADOPTED.
DICKSON SHORES PLAT: Lakeshore Drive at Lake Winona
City Manager Forbes spoke concerning a lot purchased by
Mr. Dan Boone. He related the lot purchased had not been
platted and the City, therefore, could not issue a Building
Permit. The persons the lot was purchased from were out
of town, making it more difficult to get the matter settled.
The City Manager suggested the City allow Mr. Boone to
receive his Building Permit because of the hardship while
the Plat is being completed. After discussion a MOTION WAS
MADE BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN POOL
THAT MR. BOONE BE GRANTED A VARIANCE TO THE SUBDIVISION
ORDINANCE AND A BUILDING PERMIT. THE MOTION CARRIED WITIi
COUNCILMAN BYRD VOTING NAYE, COUNCILMAN COLE, YEA, COUNCIL-
MAN POOL, YEA, COUNCILMAN THOMAS, YEA, AND MAYOR SMOAK, YEA.
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
July 22, 1980
con tId...
WASTEWATER ALTERNATIVES
City Engineer, Bud Sampson gave an outlined synopsis of
the three (3) potential. landspreading sites for the City
of Clermont. The three sites arc: (1) 70 acres owned by
Lake Shepard Groves, Inc. (2) 70 acres owned by Inland
Groves, Corp. (3) Green Valley Country Club property.
Mr. Sampson gave site advantages and disadvantages, and
an approximated cost comparison of usable portions of each
site. After extensive discussion, and overview of all
sites, Councilman Thomas withdrew his recommendation of con-
sidering the Green Valley Golf Course as a potential site.
80-1163, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN BYRD, SECONDED BY COUNCIL-
SHEPARD GROVES, INC. AS A FIRST ALTERNATIVE SHOULD THE
INLAND GROVE PROPERTY PROVE NOT TO BE FEASIBLE. PROVISIONS
IN THE CONTRACT TO BE (1) Closing is subject to approval
of the site by the regulatory agencies, 2) standard clear
title, etc. (3) terms of sale (4) Council execute
the signed contract so that it can be presented to Inc
regulatory agencies. *PJote, Councilman Pool did abstain
from voting due to a possible conflict of interest. A
Special called Council Meeting will be called when the
contract is prepared.
ORDINANCE NO. 209-C: Subdivision Ordinance (Swales - Curb & Gutter)
80-117 Ordinance No. 209-C was read by Title only. A MOTION WAS
MADE BY COUNCILMAN BYRD, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS AND
UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 209-C BE ADOPTED.
ORDINANCE NO 129-M: Street Closing on Lake Dot (unnamed street)_
Ordinance No. 129-M was read by Title only. Councilman
Thomas stated for the record, that his partner Bob Thompson,
80-118 is the selling agent for this property affected. A MOTION
WAS 11ADE BY COUNCILMAN COLE, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS
AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 129-M BE ADOPTED.
ORDINANCE NO. 131-M: Street Closing, Broome Street
Ordinance No. 131-M was read by Title only. Councilman
Thomas stated for the record, that his partner, Bob Thompson,
80-119 is the selling agent for this property. A MOTION WAS MADE
BY COUNCILMAN COLE, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS AND
UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 131-M BE ADOPTED.
ORDINANCE NO. 130-M: Closing of Portion of Lakeshore Drive
80-120 Ordinance No. 130-M was read by Title only. A MOTION WAS
MADE BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN BYRD AND
UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 130-M BE ADOPTED.
(2)
r
CITY OF CLBRHONT
MINUTES
July 22, 1980
conL'd...
ORDINANCE NO 21.0-C: Nonconforming Uses
Ordinance No. 210-C was read by Title only. City Manager
Forbes briefly summarized that this ordinance allows
nonconforming uses to be enlarged or reconstructed on
80-3.21 approval by the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUN-
CILMAN BYRD SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN COLE AND UNANIMOUSLY
CARRIED 'THAT ORDINANCE NU. 21O-C BE: ADOPTED.
ORDINANCE NO 211-C: Utility Benefit Fees
City Manager Forbes reviewed this ordinance, stating it
would require all new development to pay a fee to be used
solely for expansions to the City's Water and Sewer System
80-122 that has been caused by growth. Councilman Cole Introduced
this ordinance for First Reading. T e Or finance was read
by Title only.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
SANDRA 0. ROZAR, CI Y7/CLERK
11
July 21, 1980
F-108
REVIEW OF THREE (3) POTENTIAL LANDSPREADING SITES
for
THE CITY OF CLERMONT
SCOPE OF REPORT
This report covers as many site features as are attainable from
records, maps, photos, offers of sale and walk -ovens of the sites. No
field measurements, surveys, or soil tests have been made due to the
limited time available.
The three (3) sites are:
1. 70 acres owned by Lake Shepard Groves, Inc., approximately
1.2 miles South of S.R. 50 on the extension southerly of
Hooks Rd.
2. 70 acres owned by Inland Groves Corp., approximately 0.4 miles
South of S.R. 50 on Hooks Road,
3. Green Valley Country Club property North of S.R. 50, approxi-
mately 0.4 miles West of Hooks Road.
This report, for the purpose of comparison, applies total land
costs to the usable portions of each site and assigns no value to un-
usuable portions (wetlands).
LAKE SHEPARD GROVES, INC. SITE
Cost figures and legal description were obtained from an offer
.f
a
LAKE SHEPARD GROVES. INC.. SITE (cant.)
of sale made by Lake Shepard Groves, Inc., to the City of Clermont dated
Juno 6, 1980. The offer selling price is $250,000.00, exclusive of the
present fruit crop.
The land area is 70 acres. 27.5 acres is in citrus grove and the
remainder in marginal upland and wetlands.
$250,000.00 f 27.5 acres ■ $9,091.00/ac.
Site Advantages:
1. Isolation from roads and dwellings from aesthetic point
of view.
2. Two (2) soil borings have been made by the Lake County
Pollution Control Department indicating acceptable soil
conditions.
3. Preliminary approval of this site voted at July 14, 1980,
Lake County Pollution Control Board Meeting.
4. Site has existing sprinkler system. There is a strong possi-
bility that much of these facilities can be used for effluent
spray system.
S. Owner willing to sell.
6. "Apopka" and "Astatula" sands on soil map indicate accept-
able soil conditions.
7. Contiguous with presently owned City property.
8. Wetland shore line is 1.2 miles from open waters of named
lake (Palatlakaha).
Site Disadvantages (cont.)
2. If and when additional land is needed adjacent property
owners willingness to sell is unknown.
3. Access from County Road (2400 ft.) is not as good as the
Inland Grove Corp. site.
INLAND GROVES CORPORATION SITE
Cost figures and legal descriptions were obtained from an offer of
sale by Inland Groves Corporation, et al, to the City of Clermont dated
July 15, 1980. The offer is made in three steps:
Step 1 (1980)
The selling price for Step 1 is $175,000.00 exclusive of the present
citrus crop. The land area is 30 acres. 14.6 acres of citrus grove and
the remainder in marginal upland and wetlands.
$175,000.00 + 14.6 acres a $11,986.00/ac.
Step 2 (1982)
The selling price for Step 2 is $140,000.00 in 1982 with lease at
$500.00/ac./yr. in the interim (exclusive of citrus crop). The land
area is 20 acres. 17.2 acres of citrus grove and 2.8 acres of marginal
upland and wetlands.
$140,000.00 + 17.2 acres d $0,140.00/ae.
Rent Sept. 1 to Dec. 31, 1980 167.00/ac.
Rent Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 1981 500.00/ac.
TOTAL COST $8,807.00/ac. (Jan.l. 1982)
Step 3 (1982)
The selling price for Step 3 is $140,000.00 exclusive of citrus
crop. The land area is 20 acres all of which are in citrus, grove.
INLAND GROVES CORPORATION SITE
Step 3 (1982)_(cont.)
$140,000.00 r 20 acres $7,000.00/ac. (1982)
The offers in Step 1 and Step 2 must be exercised before December
31, 1980. The offer in Step 3 must be exercised between January 1, and
December 31, 1982.
Site Advantages
1. Isolation from roads and dwellings from aesthetic point of
view. (Except for 10 acre parcel in Step 3).
2. "Apopka" and "Astatula" sands on soil map indicate acceptable
soil conditions.
3. Closer to S.T.P. than Lake Shepard Groves Site by 3,000 feet ±.
4. Owner is willing to sell.
5. If and when additional land is needed, owner is willing to
sell
6. Access to site from County Road (1,320 feet) is better
than Lake Shepard Groves Site.
Site Disadvantages
1. No sprinkler system on site.
2. New approval from Lake County Pollution Control Board would
be required.
3. Wetland shore line is only 200 feet from open waters of
named lake (Sumner).
GREEN VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB SITE
A land cost analysis of this site is not possible at this time
GREEN VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB SITE (cant.)
because a selling price for the land is not available.
From aerial photos there appears to be approximately 65 acres of
land available for land spreading on the golf course. There is a 10
acre parcel adjacent to County Road 50 which contains a clay pit about
6-7 acres in size.
The Agricultural Engineering Department of the University of Florida
has recommended an optimum application rate of 1-1 1/4 inches of moisture
per week for golf course turf. Due to the large percentage of "rough"
compared to "fairways" on the site, we are using a moisture application
rate of 1.75 inches/week over the entire site.
The average yearly rainfall in the Clermont area is 51.3 inches.
This amounts to approximately 1 inch per week. Therefore; by subtract- I
ing the 1 inch/week of rainfall from the 1.75 inches/week of required
moisture we find that the course can take 0.75 inches/week of effluent.
Effluent at 0.75 inches/week over 65 acres totals 1,323,680 gallons
per week. At the present assumed discharge from the polishing pond of
4
403,000 gallons per day or 2.821.000 gallons/week, we would need addi-
tional area to dispose of 1.497,320 gallons/week.
The additional area needed to percolate 1,497.320 gallons/week at a'
Prate of 4 inches/week would be 13.79 acres. Li
In order to store the effluent allotted to the golf course during F
—times when it receives its optimum moisture from rainfall, it will be
necessary to construct a holding pond in the clay pit property. Each
GREEN VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB SITE (cont.)
foot of depth in the clay pit will contain 2,280,000 gallons of effluent
or 12 days of allotted effluent. It appears that the clay pit area
would be sufficient to serve this need.
Site Advantages
1. City would own a 9-hole golf course.
2. Some of the effluent's nutrients would be used to supplement
golf course fertilizer.
3. Force main would be same length as for Inland Groves Corp. -,
Site.
4. Golf course irrigation.
5. "Apopka" and "Astatula" sands on soil map indicate acceptable
soil conditions.
Site Disadvantages
1. Longer time required to get system in operation.
2. More expensive sprinkler system due to greater area to be
covered.
3. Small pond may have direct connection to Aquifer.
4. Holding pond construction required.
5. Additional acreage needed.
6. Management problems connected with golf course administration.
OVERVIEW OF SITES
The golf course site presents a different approach to effluent land
spreading than the two grove sites.
Effluent spray irrigation is a portion of a golf course maintenance
program and not primarily a means of disposing of effluent. The amount
OVERVIEW OF SITES (cont.)
of effluent applied to the course depi:nds wholly on the moisture require-
ments of the turf and not on the output of the waste treatment plant.
This is of great importance in the management of a public golf course.
In order to be self-sustaining, the course must be attractive to the
golfers who support the facility financially. There are no health or
aesthetic problems with effluent irrigation, but application rates
higher than needed may result in a change in the desired vegetation and
soft spots resulting in physical turf damage.
From an engineering standpoint, there is very little difference
between the two grove sites. The Inland Grove Site is about 15 feet
higher in elevation than the Lake Shepard Grove Site, but this differ-
ence in pumping head would be offset by the additional friction loss in
the longer pipeline to the Lake Shepard Grove Site.
The major differences between the two sites would be the initial
cost, proximity to open waters, and approval times.
Using the application rates and area approved by the Lake County
Pollution Control Board, a comparison of initial land costs based on
27.5 acres of grove follows:
1. LAKE SHEPARD GROVES SITE
27.5 acres @ $9,091.00/ac. m $250,000.00
2. INLAND GROVE CORP. SITE
OVERVIEW OF SITES (cont.)
Other considerations in the land costs would be the additional 3000
feet of force main needed to reach the lake Shepard Groves Site, and the
lack of a sprinkler system in the Inland Groves Corp. Site.
y
' '
CUP. 352-2"•
,-
:�
Y `'
; ::;`i
LAKL
�•,
�.
�-
LA
O
IJ
n
Ell
/J ,
.a.va
Its
IWO
.10
JI
JI
>•
J
d
li.11
Ma.!
N
Ja
.e
M
� O
..
.a
�
� �p
•a.
of
..
��
CUIY
II
all
M
SUMN
� as
• � as
.1
..,
1
� n
Jb
f
ZOA
•
Qi
\
} .y •
C.1
AURAL 1
1� •.
�'� .Vt'-.i
'-•-..��.'
1-_-./fLIX� 1
i
-
C•7
COMM."
i�
` I
N 1
1
CI
/LANNRI
ii /. �j�
11 �i / �:�•�,
•`A.:
/• .%•
•oo
LM
LIOMT M
a•
/
NOUSIN(
�'\K �•�
...fY-. .J�A-V.-�tid
frf ••
•
ICSSION
NCAVY
5�11 N.NER'
�. /'
ul
_y /�1
N,• t q. //-)
a' e 1
M/
IA
ec
NCAVY
AANG,I
JuwAl 1
P
2
Jr
J
I
' ® 0
FAHMINT ACRgR1,1E1IT
VI1S AGRI117.11:1T entered Into between RICHARD It, hL'YNOLOS, an Trustee, heroin-
after called "GRANTOR" and VALIltlli ANDERSON, hereinafter eallod "GRANTOE,".
The portion hereto agree an foiiowa:
l.. The GRANTOR grunts to the GRANTEE and her lit! iru, IIcennoun, via ltorn
and annignceu as canement for Lngrena and egrenn acrono the following described
rent property;
From the Southenal corner of Lot 7, Block 60, City of
Clermont, according to the official pint thereof recorded
in Plitt gook 8, Pages 17 - 23 inclunive, Public Records
of Lnke County, I'lorida, run North along the East line of
Lut 7, L15 feet to the point of beginning; from the point
of beginning run Went over Lots 7 and 8 a distance of 110
feet (able last call hereafter referred to an "Line A");
Lhence run NarLI1We9t In it straight line to the Northwent
corner of Lot 8 (thin lnst call hereafter referred to an
"Line. B"); return to the point of beginning; and run North
along; the hour line of Lot 7 it distance of 10 feet; thence
run Weal In a straight line and parallel with "Line A" to
a point that is 10 feet from "Line 11"; thence run Northwent
in it straight line and parallel with "Line B" to the West
line of Lot 5; thence run South along the West line of Lot
5 to a point that intersects "Line 11".
2. It is understood between the parties that tic GRANTOR is going to
construct a housing development• and it portion of the above described easement - - - --
traverses a proposed parking; lot. Both parties agree that the specifically
described easement is intended to grant to GRANTEE•' a general route to travel to
her property and either party may change the route by n few feet; Lo avoid
trees or other obstacles. Both parties agree to be reasonable in any deviation
from Lite description in Paragraph 1 above.
3. It is specifically understood that the easement is for ingress and egress
purposes only for vehicular traffic no larger than automobiles or pickup trucks.
4. The GRANTOR shall be responsible for maintaining the easement and keeping
it clear for the GRANTEE; provided, however, the GRANTEE agrees that temporary
obstacles within the above described easement shall not be objectionable so long
as she has a clear and practical route Lo her property.
5. This easement is contingent upon the GRANTOR acquiring title to the
property no later than September 15, 1980.
6. This easement is contingent upon the City of Clermont vacating the
streets as requested by the GRANTOR no later than September 15, 1980.
n
7. Thin vauvme:nt shall cuntloue Ito lung no the (MANTE11' daea tit) L lu:vu It more
practical route directly Lit her property.
II. Thio Agreement shall be binding upon tit(.- heirs and anntgna of the pardon.
9. Rlthsr pnrty breaching thin ARrnomonL nhall. he ilnble for conLa of nucl:
breach including it rennonable nttornoy'n feu.
Signed Lit the preaonce of:
RICHARD It. REYNOLDS, an Truntee
As to Reynolds
VALERI.Ii ANDEMSON
As to Anderson
STATF OF FLORIDA:
con'ry OP
The foregoing Gasument Agreement was acknowledged befgre me this
Jay of 1980, by RICHARD it. RLYNOLDS, as' Trustee.
Memn to: Clermont GIty Council
From: City Manager
Subject: Street closing - ].like Shore Drive
Date: July 111, 19110
Attached is Ordinance No. 130-M that han been prepared by
the City Attorney regarding the Street Cloning nlong Lake
Share Drive, between the city (tight -of way and tilt. Lako•
Since casements brtve new been obtained for this property.
Mr. Baird has recommended that this' ordinance be adopted.
Sincerely,
George b. Forbes
City Manager
CDF:pm
Attachment
A"AUR M. ROt EWS
ATTORNCY AT LAW
MAIN AT CNRRRY
OnavrLAND, ITLOnIDA 32730
n, D, nOX e7
July 22, 1,980
City Council
City of Clermont
1 Westgate Plaza
Clermont, Florida
32711
Gentlemen:
TRLC"IJaf I 904/420.210.1
It has come to my attention that there is a considerable discrepancy in
the number of grove acres contained in the lands offered for sale by
Inland Groves Corporation and C. M. Pool and Sons, Inc. (proposals
dated July 15, 1980) and the actual acres contained in such tracts.
I have been authorized as attorney for such corporations to positively
state that it is the intention of the corporations to offer the lands des-
cribed in the three proposals submitted on July 15, 1980 for the sum of
- — --$7, 000. 00 peracreof usable land included in each tract.
aiSLfully mitte
i�Ulk ZE. ROBERTS
AER/mr
RESOLUTION NO. �W'l
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ACQUISITION,
CONSTRUCTION AND ERECTION OF EXTENSIONS AND
IMPRO-LMENTS TO THE MUNICIPAL WATER AND SEWER
SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA;
AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE BY THE CITY OF NOT
EXCEEDING $1,700,000 WATER AND SEWER REVENUE
BONDS, SERIES 1960, TO FINANCE THE COST
THEREOF; PLEDGING THE NET REVENUES OF SAID
SYSTEM AND CERTAIN MUNICIPAL EXCISE TAXES TO
SECURE PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL OF AND
INTEREST ON THE BONDS; PROVIDING FOR THE
RIGHTS OF THE HOLDERS OF THE BONDS; AND
AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE BY THE CITY OF NOT
EXCEEDING $1,700,000 WATER AND SEWER REVENUE
BOND ANTICIPATION NOTES IN ANTICIPATION OF THE
ISSUANCE OF SAID BONDS, PROVIDING FOR THE
PAYMENT OF SAID NOTES AND ENTERING INTO
CERTAIN COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS WITH THE
HOLDERS THEREOF.
-1-
/%/,14 UM/MA{II
14012 J C/' &C. ® CONTAINER WASTE SERVICE
coNrnActon
3410 VIN[LANO nOAO . P. O. nOX 0007
011LAN00. FLA. 320150 • PNONC 040.7370
July 18, 1980
The Mayor and Councilmen
City of Clermont Florida
P. 0. Box 219
Clermont, Florida 32711
Re: Ordinance No. 57-M Commercial
Garbage and Trash Collection Service
Dear Mayor Smoak:
Section 5, Par. C of the above referenced Ordinance provides for annual
review of the rates and adjustments made as necessary.
A 10% increase was requested, and granted, in 1975 and an additional
15% in 1977. The 1977 adjustment was, partially, made necessary by an
87.5% increase in dump charges at Lake County Landfills. We have, otherwise,
been able to hold the line against a spiralling inflationary trend, throughout
the nearly 7 years that the franchise has been in effect.
The time has now come when we must again ask your assistance in this
unfortnaton may help yu
why weuare enow trequesting ha 25%a rate increase, toched cost sbecome effectiveuunderstand
October
1, 1980.
You are undoubtedly aware that our price structure includes a provision
to allow payment of a 5% franchise fee to the City of Clermont based on
gross monthly revenues. The franchise fee amounts to approximately $200.00
per month to the City at the present time.
We are sure you will afford this request your serious consideration
and thank you very much for the fine relationship we have enjoyed over
the past seven years.
Very truly yours,
DUMP ALL, INC.
Bernard J. Prunier
BJP/Pr
cc: Mr. George Forbes
City Manager
DUMP ALL,
INC.
ANALYSIS OF COST
INCREASES
June, 1977 - June 1980
Increase
Increase
June, 1977
June, 1980
Amount
%
Labor
4.80/hr
6.45/hr
1.65
34% i
i
Fuel
Diesel
.5044/gal
.9043/gal
.4899
97%
Gasoline
.4944/gal
1.0694/gal
.5750
116%
Insurance
Group Ins.
5,677/mo
8,543/mo
2,867/mo
51%
General Ins.
12,928/mo
18,870/mo
5,942/mo
46%
Truck Costs (F/L Mack)
63,604
91,100
26,496
42%
Typical front end
I.
loader, Dempster Body
on Mack Chassis
i'
Noma to: Clermont City Council
from: City Nannger
Subject: Uti.l.iLy Benefit Poch
hate; July 1.7, 19HO
Pursuant to City Council direction, attached !s ordinance No. 211-C, which
provides for Utility Benefit Peen for the City of Clermont.
'Phis ordinance han been reviewed by the City Attorney and City Engineer,
and requires al,l new development to pity a fee to be used solely for ex-
pansions to the Clty's Water and Sewer System that has been caused by
Growth.
A Renolution of proposed Benefit Pees is also enclosed.
Respectfully,
k i"..
George D. Forbes
CI ty M:utager
CDF:pm
Enclosures
Mvsur Lu: Clormunt City Cuuncll
Vrum: City Malinger
Sub.1veta Weekly Mvmo
Date: July 18, 1980
WASTEWATER ALTERNATIVRS. Ctty Engineer Bud Sampson will be at
Tuandnyo Council Meeting to discuss the three proposed landnprending slues.
We have reviewed all three sites with Ted Wicks of the Lnito County Pollution
Control Board, and we lire investigating the FederalRaigulntLonn regarding
Landsprending on Golf Courses or Citrus Croves.
CLTY COUNCIL WORKSHOP. A Workshop on the City Budget will be
bold next Monday at 6:00 p.mo in the City Manager's Office. A copy of the
revised proposed budget is enclosed.
PTANNI.NG b %ONING COiTMLSSION. Enclosed IN a letter from Put
Wilcox who has resigned from the P b % since he is moving to Ormond, Fla.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Enclosed is n letter from DOT
regarding the resolution that the City Council passed urging the completion
of Highway 50.
DUMP -ALL, INC. Enclosed is it letter from (lump -All, Inc. regard-
ing a rate increase. They will appear at: the City council Meeting Tuesday
night to discuss this matter.
POT.ICE DEPARTMENT. Eight traffic citations were issued lnst
week in various parts of the City.
Attached is the incident report on an unusual situation that occurred at
J. C. Beach last Thursday. It should be noted that these prisoners were
only temporarily housed at the Lake Correctional Inntitute, and were tinder
the control of the Union Correctional Institute at Raiford.
We have called the prison authorities and the Guard responsible for these
actions has resigned.
PUBLIC WORKS b UTILITIES. The Utility Department is still
having some problems with the irrigation Pump at the Treatment Plant. This
week the problem involves a cracked intake line. The Public Works Department
Is beginning the survey work necessary to complete the Sunset Lane Storm
Sewer Project.
Respectfully,
a
George D. Forbes
City Manager
GDF:pm
Attachments
�i
91(, 1:'. LaheA!loae Oahe
C.Caziont, F.102Lda 3.7711 �I 1
'rmG; 14, 1980 ,B 1dJ,r,Kv
To, G1ernGCnn of ahC. Citu. C,orrncLL
cul/.. or C..lCiunvnt
C..Caiunoru, F.tv2Lda 3.1711
Oocm S.Lnw
P.Ce 4e accejit mt/ aC4.u7ndtivn f4om :the Ci4 v, GlCrmvnt
p.CmuLinC. eravL ! LvnuCvnmLin4Lvn. h'oama anti 9 age µtan--W. .
.to aeCvcdCe .to pvwar!-by-the .Sea aA gaan a' 0"4 CCenrwnt
9t hay Geen an ent.,tme plea4uAc uvalt�vt A-ith .the rurGLic JPb4, r-d
people alto .Je4ve on .the FAMCMt i'. Z CvnmLL44Lvn. C.Ce�u wnL Liz
.indeed °Oatwwte .ta have 4aCh 1Lmut avakinn. and dedLcated ci tLge�t�
. jtvo.Lven' .in VU3 moi.t .impon,taa.t !dime of cr tlt nvveanrnCnt.
T1wn14 t•vtc ova mLLoe L" me to eCiLve r:u.th :t%Lem.
G.C. 11"IL Alice Ray.
AU•.rlaa,
R���Y"'11711flRn�
Florida 1', G)r Department of T L ansportation
Intl W.41
111)11 GRAHAM WICLIAM 11 r104C' I'
4LCIILfAl1V
uovenrmn
July 14, 1980
Mr. George D. Forbes
City Manager
City of Clermont
Post Office Box 219
Clermont, Florida 32711
Dear Mr. Forbes:
I have received your letter of July 8, 1980, with the attached
City of Clermont Resolution #354.
As you are probably aware, Mayor Smoak and Mr. Michael Willett
appeared at the Public Hearing in Tallahassee on June 20, 1980, and made
us aware of your particular problems along SR 50 in the vicinity of
Groveland and Clermont.
Secretary Rose reviewed the public hearing transcriptanddiscussed
---
the Issue with me and others In the Department. In his response to Mayor
Smoak, Secretary Rose noted that although we recognize that congestion exists
along the SR 50 corridor and would like to advance the construction date of
the proposed multi -lane project, we are unable to do so until adequate re-
venue becomes available.
I understand that Mr. Benedict, our District Engineer in your area,
has recently completed a traffic signal study of the intersection of 12th
Street and SR 50 in Clermont. That study did not warrant installation of
a traffic signal at this time.
I regret that I can not be of any assistance at this time, but I
assure you that the Department will continue to monitor financial resources
and advance construction projects along the SR 50, from Clermont to Groveland,
if appropriate revenues become available.
SSiin/cerely,
V :
C.M. Hopk ns, P.E.
Administrator of Programming
and Budget
CMH/jd
cc/ Mr. C.A. Benedict
CLERMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT
INl'1f11_ttf RYINIIta.
Rufurunee Cane N 07-0711-110
On 11111rsday, July lo, Igo, i Officer Carl Caplus, Will disloatched to it auspicious Verson
compl.tint where the suspicious person wan also repertud to Ile drunk. lbe complaint wan
made by the ru:lldmnt at 15(. Oranga Avenue. The suspicious lierc n was described as a
black male with red trunks on with his two front teeth gold 1 Upon checking by the
residence at L56 Orange Avenue, I didn't slat the suspicious portion. 1 proceeded a
block away, nlrtttlnq .I black m.tle runninq along Lake Minneol,I Drive In front of Jaycee
oeacb. I approached the subject and asked I'or identification. At that lalut ho told me
he wan a utatewide ttuetco. I advised film I was ►nuking for a black sale with rod trunks
on. Ile said he would qu with me to meet his qu.trd, at which time I passed by a state-
oweod van. I spotted a black m.tle with red trunks nit lying in the van. The van door
was standiucl wide ul,mo. _ l.asked the sebleet to nit up. Ile sat up atsl began vomiting is
the van. Ilia plain -clothed qu.rrd approached me at this point. I :dtkal the attbjuct ►yiml
in the van if hot hoti burn w.ttuletincl around. Ile acl.nin start(%% vooltinq. Ito had a struncl
other of alcohol about him. The guard identified the subject all Donald Dozier. Tito Beard
admitted to Officer Cajoles tlnat he had aomohtow gotten come alcohol, lie said he was ie
charge of the trustees. Ile said they were having a picnic for the trustees. The quard
asked mu mot to take any action aclainat Dozlor. lie acid Dozier and the other trustees
were teml,owarily housed at take Correctional institute. However, he would take Dozier
straight to ttail'ord. At this point, I stuod by until the guard got all his trustees
into the van. Ile also loaded up his picsie supplies. This guard and a W/e, whu I
took to be the quard•s wife, were the only people with the five prisoners.
Aftar the incident at the beach wan over, a Mexican male named Oscar Zapata approached
me and said the clay I wan talking to in the van had tried to qet into his car. Ile said
his vehicle was locked, so the black male walked towards the van.
Officer earl Caplan
cleomnnl Itinlice Dgoartmcnt