Loading...
07-22-1980 Supporting Documents80-114 80-115 80-110 ® CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES July 22, 1980 A Regular. Meeting of the City Council of the City of Clermont was held in the City Council Chambers on Tuesday, July 22, 1980. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Claude E. Smoak, Jr.. at 7:30 p.m. with the following Councilmen in attendance: Carlisle Byrd, Lester Cole, Bob Pool and Dennis Thomas. Other City Officials present were: City Manager Forbes, City Attorney Baird, Finance Director Saunders and City Clerk Rozar. The Invocation was offered by Councilman Byrd, followed by repeating of the Pledge of Allegiance by a].1 present. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 8, 1980 were approved as written. The Minutes of the Special Meeting of July 15, 1980 regarding Wastewater Alternatives were approved as written. DUMP -ALL: Bernard Prunier Mr. Prunier appeared before Council explaining his letter requesting an increase in rates. City Manager Forbes spoke, suggesting the City revise Ordinance No. 57-M issuing nonexclusive contracts, allowing Dump -All to compete with other garbage collecting companies, rather than having to vote on every rate change. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN BYRD, SECONDED BY COUNCIL- MAN THOMAS AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER BE ACCEPTED AND THE NECESSARY CHANGES BE MADE TO ORDINANCE NO. 57-M. It was clarified that the City and customers should be notified at least 60 days prior to a rate change. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT RESOLUTION NO. 351 City Attorney Baird explained this Resolution needed certain wording changes; not changing the content of the resolution. The changes were deemed necessary by FmIIA in order to get the bonds validated. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN BYRD, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN COLE AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 351 BE ADOPTED. DICKSON SHORES PLAT: Lakeshore Drive at Lake Winona City Manager Forbes spoke concerning a lot purchased by Mr. Dan Boone. He related the lot purchased had not been platted and the City, therefore, could not issue a Building Permit. The persons the lot was purchased from were out of town, making it more difficult to get the matter settled. The City Manager suggested the City allow Mr. Boone to receive his Building Permit because of the hardship while the Plat is being completed. After discussion a MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN POOL THAT MR. BOONE BE GRANTED A VARIANCE TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND A BUILDING PERMIT. THE MOTION CARRIED WITIi COUNCILMAN BYRD VOTING NAYE, COUNCILMAN COLE, YEA, COUNCIL- MAN POOL, YEA, COUNCILMAN THOMAS, YEA, AND MAYOR SMOAK, YEA. CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES July 22, 1980 con tId... WASTEWATER ALTERNATIVES City Engineer, Bud Sampson gave an outlined synopsis of the three (3) potential. landspreading sites for the City of Clermont. The three sites arc: (1) 70 acres owned by Lake Shepard Groves, Inc. (2) 70 acres owned by Inland Groves, Corp. (3) Green Valley Country Club property. Mr. Sampson gave site advantages and disadvantages, and an approximated cost comparison of usable portions of each site. After extensive discussion, and overview of all sites, Councilman Thomas withdrew his recommendation of con- sidering the Green Valley Golf Course as a potential site. 80-1163, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN BYRD, SECONDED BY COUNCIL- SHEPARD GROVES, INC. AS A FIRST ALTERNATIVE SHOULD THE INLAND GROVE PROPERTY PROVE NOT TO BE FEASIBLE. PROVISIONS IN THE CONTRACT TO BE (1) Closing is subject to approval of the site by the regulatory agencies, 2) standard clear title, etc. (3) terms of sale (4) Council execute the signed contract so that it can be presented to Inc regulatory agencies. *PJote, Councilman Pool did abstain from voting due to a possible conflict of interest. A Special called Council Meeting will be called when the contract is prepared. ORDINANCE NO. 209-C: Subdivision Ordinance (Swales - Curb & Gutter) 80-117 Ordinance No. 209-C was read by Title only. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN BYRD, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 209-C BE ADOPTED. ORDINANCE NO 129-M: Street Closing on Lake Dot (unnamed street)_ Ordinance No. 129-M was read by Title only. Councilman Thomas stated for the record, that his partner Bob Thompson, 80-118 is the selling agent for this property affected. A MOTION WAS 11ADE BY COUNCILMAN COLE, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 129-M BE ADOPTED. ORDINANCE NO. 131-M: Street Closing, Broome Street Ordinance No. 131-M was read by Title only. Councilman Thomas stated for the record, that his partner, Bob Thompson, 80-119 is the selling agent for this property. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN COLE, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 131-M BE ADOPTED. ORDINANCE NO. 130-M: Closing of Portion of Lakeshore Drive 80-120 Ordinance No. 130-M was read by Title only. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN BYRD AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 130-M BE ADOPTED. (2) r CITY OF CLBRHONT MINUTES July 22, 1980 conL'd... ORDINANCE NO 21.0-C: Nonconforming Uses Ordinance No. 210-C was read by Title only. City Manager Forbes briefly summarized that this ordinance allows nonconforming uses to be enlarged or reconstructed on 80-3.21 approval by the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUN- CILMAN BYRD SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN COLE AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED 'THAT ORDINANCE NU. 21O-C BE: ADOPTED. ORDINANCE NO 211-C: Utility Benefit Fees City Manager Forbes reviewed this ordinance, stating it would require all new development to pay a fee to be used solely for expansions to the City's Water and Sewer System 80-122 that has been caused by growth. Councilman Cole Introduced this ordinance for First Reading. T e Or finance was read by Title only. The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m. SANDRA 0. ROZAR, CI Y7/CLERK 11 July 21, 1980 F-108 REVIEW OF THREE (3) POTENTIAL LANDSPREADING SITES for THE CITY OF CLERMONT SCOPE OF REPORT This report covers as many site features as are attainable from records, maps, photos, offers of sale and walk -ovens of the sites. No field measurements, surveys, or soil tests have been made due to the limited time available. The three (3) sites are: 1. 70 acres owned by Lake Shepard Groves, Inc., approximately 1.2 miles South of S.R. 50 on the extension southerly of Hooks Rd. 2. 70 acres owned by Inland Groves Corp., approximately 0.4 miles South of S.R. 50 on Hooks Road, 3. Green Valley Country Club property North of S.R. 50, approxi- mately 0.4 miles West of Hooks Road. This report, for the purpose of comparison, applies total land costs to the usable portions of each site and assigns no value to un- usuable portions (wetlands). LAKE SHEPARD GROVES, INC. SITE Cost figures and legal description were obtained from an offer .f a LAKE SHEPARD GROVES. INC.. SITE (cant.) of sale made by Lake Shepard Groves, Inc., to the City of Clermont dated Juno 6, 1980. The offer selling price is $250,000.00, exclusive of the present fruit crop. The land area is 70 acres. 27.5 acres is in citrus grove and the remainder in marginal upland and wetlands. $250,000.00 f 27.5 acres ■ $9,091.00/ac. Site Advantages: 1. Isolation from roads and dwellings from aesthetic point of view. 2. Two (2) soil borings have been made by the Lake County Pollution Control Department indicating acceptable soil conditions. 3. Preliminary approval of this site voted at July 14, 1980, Lake County Pollution Control Board Meeting. 4. Site has existing sprinkler system. There is a strong possi- bility that much of these facilities can be used for effluent spray system. S. Owner willing to sell. 6. "Apopka" and "Astatula" sands on soil map indicate accept- able soil conditions. 7. Contiguous with presently owned City property. 8. Wetland shore line is 1.2 miles from open waters of named lake (Palatlakaha). Site Disadvantages (cont.) 2. If and when additional land is needed adjacent property owners willingness to sell is unknown. 3. Access from County Road (2400 ft.) is not as good as the Inland Grove Corp. site. INLAND GROVES CORPORATION SITE Cost figures and legal descriptions were obtained from an offer of sale by Inland Groves Corporation, et al, to the City of Clermont dated July 15, 1980. The offer is made in three steps: Step 1 (1980) The selling price for Step 1 is $175,000.00 exclusive of the present citrus crop. The land area is 30 acres. 14.6 acres of citrus grove and the remainder in marginal upland and wetlands. $175,000.00 + 14.6 acres a $11,986.00/ac. Step 2 (1982) The selling price for Step 2 is $140,000.00 in 1982 with lease at $500.00/ac./yr. in the interim (exclusive of citrus crop). The land area is 20 acres. 17.2 acres of citrus grove and 2.8 acres of marginal upland and wetlands. $140,000.00 + 17.2 acres d $0,140.00/ae. Rent Sept. 1 to Dec. 31, 1980 167.00/ac. Rent Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 1981 500.00/ac. TOTAL COST $8,807.00/ac. (Jan.l. 1982) Step 3 (1982) The selling price for Step 3 is $140,000.00 exclusive of citrus crop. The land area is 20 acres all of which are in citrus, grove. INLAND GROVES CORPORATION SITE Step 3 (1982)_(cont.) $140,000.00 r 20 acres $7,000.00/ac. (1982) The offers in Step 1 and Step 2 must be exercised before December 31, 1980. The offer in Step 3 must be exercised between January 1, and December 31, 1982. Site Advantages 1. Isolation from roads and dwellings from aesthetic point of view. (Except for 10 acre parcel in Step 3). 2. "Apopka" and "Astatula" sands on soil map indicate acceptable soil conditions. 3. Closer to S.T.P. than Lake Shepard Groves Site by 3,000 feet ±. 4. Owner is willing to sell. 5. If and when additional land is needed, owner is willing to sell 6. Access to site from County Road (1,320 feet) is better than Lake Shepard Groves Site. Site Disadvantages 1. No sprinkler system on site. 2. New approval from Lake County Pollution Control Board would be required. 3. Wetland shore line is only 200 feet from open waters of named lake (Sumner). GREEN VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB SITE A land cost analysis of this site is not possible at this time GREEN VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB SITE (cant.) because a selling price for the land is not available. From aerial photos there appears to be approximately 65 acres of land available for land spreading on the golf course. There is a 10 acre parcel adjacent to County Road 50 which contains a clay pit about 6-7 acres in size. The Agricultural Engineering Department of the University of Florida has recommended an optimum application rate of 1-1 1/4 inches of moisture per week for golf course turf. Due to the large percentage of "rough" compared to "fairways" on the site, we are using a moisture application rate of 1.75 inches/week over the entire site. The average yearly rainfall in the Clermont area is 51.3 inches. This amounts to approximately 1 inch per week. Therefore; by subtract- I ing the 1 inch/week of rainfall from the 1.75 inches/week of required moisture we find that the course can take 0.75 inches/week of effluent. Effluent at 0.75 inches/week over 65 acres totals 1,323,680 gallons per week. At the present assumed discharge from the polishing pond of 4 403,000 gallons per day or 2.821.000 gallons/week, we would need addi- tional area to dispose of 1.497,320 gallons/week. The additional area needed to percolate 1,497.320 gallons/week at a' Prate of 4 inches/week would be 13.79 acres. Li In order to store the effluent allotted to the golf course during F —times when it receives its optimum moisture from rainfall, it will be necessary to construct a holding pond in the clay pit property. Each GREEN VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB SITE (cont.) foot of depth in the clay pit will contain 2,280,000 gallons of effluent or 12 days of allotted effluent. It appears that the clay pit area would be sufficient to serve this need. Site Advantages 1. City would own a 9-hole golf course. 2. Some of the effluent's nutrients would be used to supplement golf course fertilizer. 3. Force main would be same length as for Inland Groves Corp. -, Site. 4. Golf course irrigation. 5. "Apopka" and "Astatula" sands on soil map indicate acceptable soil conditions. Site Disadvantages 1. Longer time required to get system in operation. 2. More expensive sprinkler system due to greater area to be covered. 3. Small pond may have direct connection to Aquifer. 4. Holding pond construction required. 5. Additional acreage needed. 6. Management problems connected with golf course administration. OVERVIEW OF SITES The golf course site presents a different approach to effluent land spreading than the two grove sites. Effluent spray irrigation is a portion of a golf course maintenance program and not primarily a means of disposing of effluent. The amount OVERVIEW OF SITES (cont.) of effluent applied to the course depi:nds wholly on the moisture require- ments of the turf and not on the output of the waste treatment plant. This is of great importance in the management of a public golf course. In order to be self-sustaining, the course must be attractive to the golfers who support the facility financially. There are no health or aesthetic problems with effluent irrigation, but application rates higher than needed may result in a change in the desired vegetation and soft spots resulting in physical turf damage. From an engineering standpoint, there is very little difference between the two grove sites. The Inland Grove Site is about 15 feet higher in elevation than the Lake Shepard Grove Site, but this differ- ence in pumping head would be offset by the additional friction loss in the longer pipeline to the Lake Shepard Grove Site. The major differences between the two sites would be the initial cost, proximity to open waters, and approval times. Using the application rates and area approved by the Lake County Pollution Control Board, a comparison of initial land costs based on 27.5 acres of grove follows: 1. LAKE SHEPARD GROVES SITE 27.5 acres @ $9,091.00/ac. m $250,000.00 2. INLAND GROVE CORP. SITE OVERVIEW OF SITES (cont.) Other considerations in the land costs would be the additional 3000 feet of force main needed to reach the lake Shepard Groves Site, and the lack of a sprinkler system in the Inland Groves Corp. Site. y ' ' CUP. 352-2"• ,- :� Y `' ; ::;`i LAKL �•, �. �- LA O IJ n Ell /J , .a.va Its IWO .10 JI JI >• J d li.11 Ma.! N Ja .e M � O .. .a � � �p •a. of .. �� CUIY II all M SUMN � as • � as .1 .., 1 � n Jb f ZOA • Qi \ } .y • C.1 AURAL 1 1� •. �'� .Vt'-.i '-•-..��.' 1-_-./fLIX� 1 i - C•7 COMM." i� ` I N 1 1 CI /LANNRI ii /. �j� 11 �i / �:�•�, •`A.: /• .%• •oo LM LIOMT M a• / NOUSIN( �'\K �•� ...fY-. .J�A-V.-�tid frf •• • ICSSION NCAVY 5�11 N.NER' �. /' ul _y /�1 N,• t q. //-) a' e 1 M/ IA ec NCAVY AANG,I JuwAl 1 P 2 Jr J I ' ® 0 FAHMINT ACRgR1,1E1IT VI1S AGRI117.11:1T entered Into between RICHARD It, hL'YNOLOS, an Trustee, heroin- after called "GRANTOR" and VALIltlli ANDERSON, hereinafter eallod "GRANTOE,". The portion hereto agree an foiiowa: l.. The GRANTOR grunts to the GRANTEE and her lit! iru, IIcennoun, via ltorn and annignceu as canement for Lngrena and egrenn acrono the following described rent property; From the Southenal corner of Lot 7, Block 60, City of Clermont, according to the official pint thereof recorded in Plitt gook 8, Pages 17 - 23 inclunive, Public Records of Lnke County, I'lorida, run North along the East line of Lut 7, L15 feet to the point of beginning; from the point of beginning run Went over Lots 7 and 8 a distance of 110 feet (able last call hereafter referred to an "Line A"); Lhence run NarLI1We9t In it straight line to the Northwent corner of Lot 8 (thin lnst call hereafter referred to an "Line. B"); return to the point of beginning; and run North along; the hour line of Lot 7 it distance of 10 feet; thence run Weal In a straight line and parallel with "Line A" to a point that is 10 feet from "Line 11"; thence run Northwent in it straight line and parallel with "Line B" to the West line of Lot 5; thence run South along the West line of Lot 5 to a point that intersects "Line 11". 2. It is understood between the parties that tic GRANTOR is going to construct a housing development• and it portion of the above described easement - - - -- traverses a proposed parking; lot. Both parties agree that the specifically described easement is intended to grant to GRANTEE•' a general route to travel to her property and either party may change the route by n few feet; Lo avoid trees or other obstacles. Both parties agree to be reasonable in any deviation from Lite description in Paragraph 1 above. 3. It is specifically understood that the easement is for ingress and egress purposes only for vehicular traffic no larger than automobiles or pickup trucks. 4. The GRANTOR shall be responsible for maintaining the easement and keeping it clear for the GRANTEE; provided, however, the GRANTEE agrees that temporary obstacles within the above described easement shall not be objectionable so long as she has a clear and practical route Lo her property. 5. This easement is contingent upon the GRANTOR acquiring title to the property no later than September 15, 1980. 6. This easement is contingent upon the City of Clermont vacating the streets as requested by the GRANTOR no later than September 15, 1980. n 7. Thin vauvme:nt shall cuntloue Ito lung no the (MANTE11' daea tit) L lu:vu It more practical route directly Lit her property. II. Thio Agreement shall be binding upon tit(.- heirs and anntgna of the pardon. 9. Rlthsr pnrty breaching thin ARrnomonL nhall. he ilnble for conLa of nucl: breach including it rennonable nttornoy'n feu. Signed Lit the preaonce of: RICHARD It. REYNOLDS, an Truntee As to Reynolds VALERI.Ii ANDEMSON As to Anderson STATF OF FLORIDA: con'ry OP The foregoing Gasument Agreement was acknowledged befgre me this Jay of 1980, by RICHARD it. RLYNOLDS, as' Trustee. Memn to: Clermont GIty Council From: City Manager Subject: Street closing - ].like Shore Drive Date: July 111, 19110 Attached is Ordinance No. 130-M that han been prepared by the City Attorney regarding the Street Cloning nlong Lake Share Drive, between the city (tight -of way and tilt. Lako• Since casements brtve new been obtained for this property. Mr. Baird has recommended that this' ordinance be adopted. Sincerely, George b. Forbes City Manager CDF:pm Attachment A"AUR M. ROt EWS ATTORNCY AT LAW MAIN AT CNRRRY OnavrLAND, ITLOnIDA 32730 n, D, nOX e7 July 22, 1,980 City Council City of Clermont 1 Westgate Plaza Clermont, Florida 32711 Gentlemen: TRLC"IJaf I 904/420.210.1 It has come to my attention that there is a considerable discrepancy in the number of grove acres contained in the lands offered for sale by Inland Groves Corporation and C. M. Pool and Sons, Inc. (proposals dated July 15, 1980) and the actual acres contained in such tracts. I have been authorized as attorney for such corporations to positively state that it is the intention of the corporations to offer the lands des- cribed in the three proposals submitted on July 15, 1980 for the sum of - — --$7, 000. 00 peracreof usable land included in each tract. aiSLfully mitte i�Ulk ZE. ROBERTS AER/mr RESOLUTION NO. �W'l RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION AND ERECTION OF EXTENSIONS AND IMPRO-LMENTS TO THE MUNICIPAL WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA; AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE BY THE CITY OF NOT EXCEEDING $1,700,000 WATER AND SEWER REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1960, TO FINANCE THE COST THEREOF; PLEDGING THE NET REVENUES OF SAID SYSTEM AND CERTAIN MUNICIPAL EXCISE TAXES TO SECURE PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL OF AND INTEREST ON THE BONDS; PROVIDING FOR THE RIGHTS OF THE HOLDERS OF THE BONDS; AND AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE BY THE CITY OF NOT EXCEEDING $1,700,000 WATER AND SEWER REVENUE BOND ANTICIPATION NOTES IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF SAID BONDS, PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF SAID NOTES AND ENTERING INTO CERTAIN COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS WITH THE HOLDERS THEREOF. -1- /%/,14 UM/MA{II 14012 J C/' &C. ® CONTAINER WASTE SERVICE coNrnActon 3410 VIN[LANO nOAO . P. O. nOX 0007 011LAN00. FLA. 320150 • PNONC 040.7370 July 18, 1980 The Mayor and Councilmen City of Clermont Florida P. 0. Box 219 Clermont, Florida 32711 Re: Ordinance No. 57-M Commercial Garbage and Trash Collection Service Dear Mayor Smoak: Section 5, Par. C of the above referenced Ordinance provides for annual review of the rates and adjustments made as necessary. A 10% increase was requested, and granted, in 1975 and an additional 15% in 1977. The 1977 adjustment was, partially, made necessary by an 87.5% increase in dump charges at Lake County Landfills. We have, otherwise, been able to hold the line against a spiralling inflationary trend, throughout the nearly 7 years that the franchise has been in effect. The time has now come when we must again ask your assistance in this unfortnaton may help yu why weuare enow trequesting ha 25%a rate increase, toched cost sbecome effectiveuunderstand October 1, 1980. You are undoubtedly aware that our price structure includes a provision to allow payment of a 5% franchise fee to the City of Clermont based on gross monthly revenues. The franchise fee amounts to approximately $200.00 per month to the City at the present time. We are sure you will afford this request your serious consideration and thank you very much for the fine relationship we have enjoyed over the past seven years. Very truly yours, DUMP ALL, INC. Bernard J. Prunier BJP/Pr cc: Mr. George Forbes City Manager DUMP ALL, INC. ANALYSIS OF COST INCREASES June, 1977 - June 1980 Increase Increase June, 1977 June, 1980 Amount % Labor 4.80/hr 6.45/hr 1.65 34% i i Fuel Diesel .5044/gal .9043/gal .4899 97% Gasoline .4944/gal 1.0694/gal .5750 116% Insurance Group Ins. 5,677/mo 8,543/mo 2,867/mo 51% General Ins. 12,928/mo 18,870/mo 5,942/mo 46% Truck Costs (F/L Mack) 63,604 91,100 26,496 42% Typical front end I. loader, Dempster Body on Mack Chassis i' Noma to: Clermont City Council from: City Nannger Subject: Uti.l.iLy Benefit Poch hate; July 1.7, 19HO Pursuant to City Council direction, attached !s ordinance No. 211-C, which provides for Utility Benefit Peen for the City of Clermont. 'Phis ordinance han been reviewed by the City Attorney and City Engineer, and requires al,l new development to pity a fee to be used solely for ex- pansions to the Clty's Water and Sewer System that has been caused by Growth. A Renolution of proposed Benefit Pees is also enclosed. Respectfully, k i".. George D. Forbes CI ty M:utager CDF:pm Enclosures Mvsur Lu: Clormunt City Cuuncll Vrum: City Malinger Sub.1veta Weekly Mvmo Date: July 18, 1980 WASTEWATER ALTERNATIVRS. Ctty Engineer Bud Sampson will be at Tuandnyo Council Meeting to discuss the three proposed landnprending slues. We have reviewed all three sites with Ted Wicks of the Lnito County Pollution Control Board, and we lire investigating the FederalRaigulntLonn regarding Landsprending on Golf Courses or Citrus Croves. CLTY COUNCIL WORKSHOP. A Workshop on the City Budget will be bold next Monday at 6:00 p.mo in the City Manager's Office. A copy of the revised proposed budget is enclosed. PTANNI.NG b %ONING COiTMLSSION. Enclosed IN a letter from Put Wilcox who has resigned from the P b % since he is moving to Ormond, Fla. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Enclosed is n letter from DOT regarding the resolution that the City Council passed urging the completion of Highway 50. DUMP -ALL, INC. Enclosed is it letter from (lump -All, Inc. regard- ing a rate increase. They will appear at: the City council Meeting Tuesday night to discuss this matter. POT.ICE DEPARTMENT. Eight traffic citations were issued lnst week in various parts of the City. Attached is the incident report on an unusual situation that occurred at J. C. Beach last Thursday. It should be noted that these prisoners were only temporarily housed at the Lake Correctional Inntitute, and were tinder the control of the Union Correctional Institute at Raiford. We have called the prison authorities and the Guard responsible for these actions has resigned. PUBLIC WORKS b UTILITIES. The Utility Department is still having some problems with the irrigation Pump at the Treatment Plant. This week the problem involves a cracked intake line. The Public Works Department Is beginning the survey work necessary to complete the Sunset Lane Storm Sewer Project. Respectfully, a George D. Forbes City Manager GDF:pm Attachments �i 91(, 1:'. LaheA!loae Oahe C.Caziont, F.102Lda 3.7711 �I 1 'rmG; 14, 1980 ,B 1dJ,r,Kv To, G1ernGCnn of ahC. Citu. C,orrncLL cul/.. or C..lCiunvnt C..Caiunoru, F.tv2Lda 3.1711 Oocm S.Lnw P.Ce 4e accejit mt/ aC4.u7ndtivn f4om :the Ci4 v, GlCrmvnt p.CmuLinC. eravL ! LvnuCvnmLin4Lvn. h'oama anti 9 age µtan--W. . .to aeCvcdCe .to pvwar!-by-the .Sea aA gaan a' 0"4 CCenrwnt 9t hay Geen an ent.,tme plea4uAc uvalt�vt A-ith .the rurGLic JPb4, r-d people alto .Je4ve on .the FAMCMt i'. Z CvnmLL44Lvn. C.Ce�u wnL Liz .indeed °Oatwwte .ta have 4aCh 1Lmut avakinn. and dedLcated ci tLge�t� . jtvo.Lven' .in VU3 moi.t .impon,taa.t !dime of cr tlt nvveanrnCnt. T1wn14 t•vtc ova mLLoe L" me to eCiLve r:u.th :t%Lem. G.C. 11"IL Alice Ray. AU•.rlaa, R���Y"'11711flRn� Florida 1', G)r Department of T L ansportation Intl W.41 111)11 GRAHAM WICLIAM 11 r104C' I' 4LCIILfAl1V uovenrmn July 14, 1980 Mr. George D. Forbes City Manager City of Clermont Post Office Box 219 Clermont, Florida 32711 Dear Mr. Forbes: I have received your letter of July 8, 1980, with the attached City of Clermont Resolution #354. As you are probably aware, Mayor Smoak and Mr. Michael Willett appeared at the Public Hearing in Tallahassee on June 20, 1980, and made us aware of your particular problems along SR 50 in the vicinity of Groveland and Clermont. Secretary Rose reviewed the public hearing transcriptanddiscussed --- the Issue with me and others In the Department. In his response to Mayor Smoak, Secretary Rose noted that although we recognize that congestion exists along the SR 50 corridor and would like to advance the construction date of the proposed multi -lane project, we are unable to do so until adequate re- venue becomes available. I understand that Mr. Benedict, our District Engineer in your area, has recently completed a traffic signal study of the intersection of 12th Street and SR 50 in Clermont. That study did not warrant installation of a traffic signal at this time. I regret that I can not be of any assistance at this time, but I assure you that the Department will continue to monitor financial resources and advance construction projects along the SR 50, from Clermont to Groveland, if appropriate revenues become available. SSiin/cerely, V : C.M. Hopk ns, P.E. Administrator of Programming and Budget CMH/jd cc/ Mr. C.A. Benedict CLERMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT INl'1f11_ttf RYINIIta. Rufurunee Cane N 07-0711-110 On 11111rsday, July lo, Igo, i Officer Carl Caplus, Will disloatched to it auspicious Verson compl.tint where the suspicious person wan also repertud to Ile drunk. lbe complaint wan made by the ru:lldmnt at 15(. Oranga Avenue. The suspicious lierc n was described as a black male with red trunks on with his two front teeth gold 1 Upon checking by the residence at L56 Orange Avenue, I didn't slat the suspicious portion. 1 proceeded a block away, nlrtttlnq .I black m.tle runninq along Lake Minneol,I Drive In front of Jaycee oeacb. I approached the subject and asked I'or identification. At that lalut ho told me he wan a utatewide ttuetco. I advised film I was ►nuking for a black sale with rod trunks on. Ile said he would qu with me to meet his qu.trd, at which time I passed by a state- oweod van. I spotted a black m.tle with red trunks nit lying in the van. The van door was standiucl wide ul,mo. _ l.asked the sebleet to nit up. Ile sat up atsl began vomiting is the van. Ilia plain -clothed qu.rrd approached me at this point. I :dtkal the attbjuct ►yiml in the van if hot hoti burn w.ttuletincl around. Ile acl.nin start(%% vooltinq. Ito had a struncl other of alcohol about him. The guard identified the subject all Donald Dozier. Tito Beard admitted to Officer Cajoles tlnat he had aomohtow gotten come alcohol, lie said he was ie charge of the trustees. Ile said they were having a picnic for the trustees. The quard asked mu mot to take any action aclainat Dozlor. lie acid Dozier and the other trustees were teml,owarily housed at take Correctional institute. However, he would take Dozier straight to ttail'ord. At this point, I stuod by until the guard got all his trustees into the van. Ile also loaded up his picsie supplies. This guard and a W/e, whu I took to be the quard•s wife, were the only people with the five prisoners. Aftar the incident at the beach wan over, a Mexican male named Oscar Zapata approached me and said the clay I wan talking to in the van had tried to qet into his car. Ile said his vehicle was locked, so the black male walked towards the van. Officer earl Caplan cleomnnl Itinlice Dgoartmcnt