05-27-1980 Supporting DocumentsCITY OP CLENIONT
MINUTES
REGULAR MEE''I.NG
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clermont was
held in the Council Chambers an Tuesday, May 27, 1980. The most•-
ing was called to order. by Mayor. Claude I. Smoak, Jr.. at 7:30 p.m.
with the following Councilman in atlandance: Carlisle Byrd,
Lester Cole, and Dennis Thomas. Other City Officials present were
City Manager Forbes, City Attorney Baird, Finance Director Saunders
and City Clark Rozar.
The Invocation was offered by Councilman Byrd, followed by repeating
of the pledge of: allegiance by all present.
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting held May 13, 1980 were approved
as presented.
VARIANCE REQUEST: Margarec Subdivision
The City Council acting as a Board of Adjustment, considered
a request by Bob nester in order to construct roadside swales
on the streets of the proposed Margaree Gardens Subdivision, t
whereas curb and gutter streets are required. Mr. Hester
stated that this land is well suited for swales since it has
excellent percolating soils, and being relatively flat will
not cause accelerated runoff and erosion that could occur
with parcels of extreme elevation variations. He stated
further that this practice assists in the protection of our
clean water. Mr. John Springstead, City Engineer recommended
that the City should adhere to the Code of Ordinances, and
stated that roadside swales often introduce several main-
tenance problems. Maintenance of swales is difficult to
control since the construction and grading of individual lots
often damage the swales, and driveway culverts must be set
properly to conform to the drainage design. The overall
appearance of a street with swales is affected more by
different degrees of homeowner maintenance than on a curbed
street. Mr. Hester stated that this subdivision would be
of such caliber and have such strict covenants governing
the maintenance of swales that the above problems would not
be a factor. Mr. Springstead stated that swales can be
successful if constructed and maintained properly. It was
recommended that the Subdivision Ordinance be reviewed con- !
cerning swales as well as curb and gutter streets to provide 6
parameters for the construction of swales, at the City's
option. It was determined there was no particular hardship
warranting a variance, however, there is sufficient evidence
that swales can be adapted efficiently and should be presented
to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration.
80-80 A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN COLE, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN
THOMAS AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT THE REQUEST BE TABLED UNTIL
THE NEXT MEETING AND REFERRED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION FOR STUDY AND RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: 151- 161 East Minnehaha Avenue
Lake Highlands Nursing home
City Manager Forbes spoke concerning the conditional use
permit, stating the Nursing Home had revised their site
plans as requested by the Planning and Zoning Commission
and had met the specifications proposed by them. He rec-
ommended the request be approved with eight (8) conditions
0 0 0
CITY OP CLEPAIONT
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
that must be followed, outlinod by the Planning and
Zoning Commission as listed:
1. Parking: The grass parking to the South of: this
development will be paved within 180 days if de-
termined by the City Council at• a later date, that
the intensive use of these parking areas require
paved parking. Any work on properly zoned R-1-A
must conform to the City's Zoning Ordinances.
2. A Sidewalk must be constructed to City standards
by the owner around the entire Nursing Home.
3. All applicable Regulations and Ordinances be met.
4. The use not be expanded except with a Conditional
Use Permit.
5. All conditions prior to the issuance of a Certi-
ficate of Occupancy.
6. Since the proposed building is very close to or
attached to the existing buildings, the existing
facilities must conform to the standards of the
Fire + Life Safety Portions of the Southern Standard
Building Code.
7. The present building be face lifted as shown on the
Architect's Conceptual Plans.
8. The visual appearance of the Shed to the South of
the property be upgraded in appearance.
Mr. Herbert Rogers spoke relating the desire of the Nursing
80-81 Home for the permit. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN COLE,
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED TIiAT
THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BE GRANTED.
VARIANCE: 1728 Nita Place, Mr. Vernon Gill
City Manager Forbes explained the request for approval to
locate a house at the seventy foot building line, whereas
100' is required. He commented the lot size meets the re-
quirements for the Zoning Ordinance, and a home could be
placed farther back on the lot to meet the zoning setback
requirements, however, this would require the home to be
placed closer to the canal, and would not conform to the
City's flood regulations. It would not be possible for a
home to meet these :requirements if. it were placed farther
back on the lot, and many other lakefront owners have
received variances for these same reasons. Mrs. Boyd stated
her only opposition would be the encroachment of any lot
on Point Place. She stated Lakeshore Drive would be the
only access to the lot because Nita Place is a private drive.
80-82 After much discussion, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN
THOMAS SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN COLE AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED
THAT THE VARIANCE BE GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE DETERMINATION OF
THE LEGAL ACCESS OF THE PROPERTY BY NITA PLACE.
-2-
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
VARIANCE•' REQUEST: 220 Disston Street, Mr. Jerry Mcilan
A request was received from Mr. Jerry Mcilan for the
construction of a screened room that would penetrate
516" into the required 25' rear yard setback. After
80-83 some discussion, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN BYRD,
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED
TO GRANT THE VARIANCE.
ORDINANCE NO. 206-C
City Manager Forbes gave a brief summary of the history
of this ordinance, explaining the transition zones and
the recommendations of the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Mr. Jim Adamson of Blue Goose Growers presented the
views of that company requesting the area encompassing
their property be zoned M-1. After extensive discussion,
80-84 A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN BYRD, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMAN COLE AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED TO AMEND ORDINANCE
NO. 206-C TO ZONE THE PROPERTY UTILIZED BY BLUE GOOSE
FROM R-3 TO M-1.
A request was made by Bell Ceramics to postpone any action
concerning that property until the second meeting in June.
80-85 A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN BYRD, SECONDED BY MAYOR
SMOAK AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT THE FIEARING BE CONTINUED
UNTIL THE DATE REQUESTED IIY BELL CERAMICS AND THAT THE
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 206-C BE TABLED UNTIL THE SAME DATE.
ORDINANCE NO. 208-C, FINAL READING AND ADOPTION
City Manager Forbes explained this Ordinance and recommended
changes as listed in his May 23, 1980 memo. After extensive
80-86 discussion, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN COLE AND UNAN-
IMOUSLY CARRIED THAT A MOBILE HOME PARK BE REQUIRED TO
ENCOMPASS AT LEAST A TEN (10) ACRE PARCEL OF LAND.
80-87 A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN
COLS AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT SHOPPING CENTERS BE DEFINED
AS ANY GROUP OF FIVE OR MORE BUSINESSES WITH SHARED PARKING
OR IN WHICH THE TOTAL LAND AREA OF THE DEVELOPMENT EXCEEDS
FIVE ACRES.
80-88 A MOTION WAS MADE BY MAYOR SMOAK, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN
THOMAS-AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT, UNDER CONDITIONAL USES
IN THE C-2 ZONE, AGRICULTURALLY RELATED BUSINESSES BE INCLUDED.
80-89 Ordinance No. 208-C was read by Title only and a MOTION WAS
MADE BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS AND SECONDED BYICOUNCILMAN COLE
TO ADOPT THIS ORDINANCE AS AMENDED AS STATED IN THE CITY
MANAGER'S ZONING AND SIGN ORDINANCE MEMO, DATED MAY 23, 1110
WITH THE ABOVE CHANGES. COUNCILMAN BYRD VOTING AYE AND
MAYOR SMOAK VOTING AYE, THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
-3-
es
CITY OF CLERYONT
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CRIME CLEARANCE
T e C ty Manager stated the Uniform Crime Report for the
month of April shows the City's clearance rate for crimes
at 60% and the recovery of stolen property at 80% for the
month. lie commended Chief Tyndal and the Police Department
for their outstanding job performance.
MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayor Smoak recognized the candadites for the Council Seat
to be filled at the Special Election of June 10, 1980. He
recommended a factual presentation be published in a local
newspaper of the position the Council has officially taken
stating the facts considered in making this decision regard-
80-90 ing the Marshland Alternative. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCIL-
MAN BYRD, SECONDED IIY COUNCILMAN COLE AND UNANIMOUSLY CAR-
RIED THAT THE CITY MANAGER PREPARE A PRESENTATION FOR THE
PRESS SUMMARIZING THE FACTS CONSIDERED IN THE CITY COUNCIL'S
DECISION IN PURSUING THE MARSHLAND ALTERNATIVE FOR EFFLUENT
DISPOSAL. - - - --- --
Mayor Smoak also requested the prevailing candidate be sworn
in the night of the Town Hall Meeting if possible.
COUNCILMAN BYRD
Councilman Byrd stated our legislative representatives
should be notified of our concern for the completion of the
widening of highway 50 and other persons that could persuade
DOT.
COUNCILMAN THOMAS
Councilman Thomas commended the swim program and their
efforts.
ORDINANCE NO. 126-M - VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION
Mayor Smoak related the request that Richard Swann submitted
for annexing property located just south of the Lakeview
Hills Subdivision. Since the owners have now filed appli-
cations to rezone the abutting properties to single family,
they now wish to proceed with the annexation. After dis-
cussion, it was clarified that annexing this property would
have no effect on whether the county or city will rezone it.
80-91 THE ORDINANCE WAS READ BY TITLE ONLY AND INTRODUCED BY MAYOR
SMOAK FOR FIRST READING.
COMPUTER PURCHASE
Mayor Smoak spoke, relating the need for the computer and
conveying the investigation of the Finance Director in
making a decision on the NCR 8150.. After some discussion,
80-92 A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN COLE, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN
THOMAS AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT THE CITY ACCEPT NCR'S
PROPOSAL FOR AN NCR 8150 MINI -COMPUTER.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:10 p.m.
-4
CITY OR CI RRAIONT
MINUTES
REGULAR MER'I'ING
Juno 1.0, 1900
L ��,�Ilry
ANDRA 0. ROZCLPRK
Monia to: ClurmonL CLLy Counul.l.
From: GUY Manager
SubJucL: Voluntary Annexation
Date: May 22, 19130
We have received a .letter from Lakeview Ltd. (attached) requcnti.ng that the
City Annex property located Just south of the LakovLew II1.11s Subdivinion.
As you cony recall, at the February .11, 1980 City Council Meeting, thin request
was tabled until the owner." clarified their. Intent to rezone much of their
abutting proportion in Chin area from R-3-A Multiple Family to a Single
Family use.
Since the owners have now filed applications to rezone the abutting properties
to single family, they now wish to proceed with the annexation. Attached are
previous memos and a map of this property.
Respectfully,
....... George D. Forbes _...... _._. _..:..
City Manager
CDF:pm
Enclosures
MISC. ORDINANCES N° 373
ORDINANCE N0. 12614
AN ORDINANCE UNDER THE CODE AR ORDINANCES OF THE CITY 01'
CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ANNEXATION
OF A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND CONTIGUOUS TO THE PRESENT CITY
BOUNDARIES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION.
WIIE[t,AS, tl:e City Council of the City of Clermont, Florida, has received n
Petition for Annexation of a parcel of land contiguous to tlw present corporate
limits under Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and
WHEREAS, the City Council of tl:e City of Clermont, Florida, line determined
that it is in the best interest of the City and of the property herein sought to
be annexed that the City annex the following described property, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the area sought to be annexed
is contiguous to the City and is in need of the services which the City can offer
and the City has determined that such areas sought to be annexed will be substantially
benefited by annexation, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that all requirements of Sections
171.044 and 171.042, Florida Statutes, have been met.
SECTION I.
Under the provisions of Florida Statute Chapter 171 and the General and Special
Laws of the State of Florida; that the City of Clermont, Florida, does hereby
annex to and make part of its corporate boundaries, the following described property
contiguous to the present City boundary, to -wit:
Tracts 8 and 9, and that part of Tracts 7 and 10
lying West of Highway No. 27, according to Lake
Highlands Plat of Section 32, Township 22 South,
Range 26 East, all in Lake County, Florida.
SECTION 2:
That the aforedescribed property shall be and hereby is made part and parcel
of the City of Clermont, Florida, and that said property and all residents of said
property shall be subject to all of the laws, ordinances and provisions pertaining
to the City of Clermont, Florida.
SECTION 3:
All property aforedescribed shall henceforth be subject to ad valorem taxation
by the City of Clermont, and any other general or special taxes or assessments.
MISC. ORDINANCES N9 374
ORDINANCE NO. 126M
SECTION 4:
Should any section or part of a section be declared invalid by any court of
competent jurisdiction, such adjudications shall not apply or affect any other
provision of this ordinance, except to the extent that the entire section or part of
the section may be inseparable in meaning and effect from the section to which such
holding shall apply.
SECTION 5:
This ordinance shall be published as provided by law, and it shall become
law and take effect upon its second reading and final passage.
First Reading on this day of , A. D., 1980.
Second Reading on this day of , A. D., 1980.
PASSED AND ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY,
FLORIDA, this day of 1980.
CITY OF CLERMONT
BY:
CLAUDE E. SMOAK, JR., Mayor
ATTEST:
AICNAMU AOCAWOLL SWANN
I
UWAMO ELLIS IIAUOOCN, JIL
TIIOMAS P. LANE
PAUL P. ONYAN
OAIAN O. PILL
PATAICIA A. OSTIIWILL
UAMSS O. WILLAAO
Pa AVIS ►AILS SWANN
a, G0.-
SWANN AN.I) I-IAI)DOWL
PAOAASaIONAL ASSOCIATION
ATTORNRYO AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
May 14, 1980
000 COUINLN D a11111ar • SUITS 000
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 112004
TOLOPIIONS
13051 a0aa030
Mr. George D. Forbes
Clermont City Manager
P. O. Box 219
Clermont, FL 32711
Re: Lakeview, Ltd. zoning change
Dear George:
Enclosed is a Request for Change of Zoning of certain
parcels of land adjacent to the Lakeview Hills subdivision
and of which we discussed in your office during our meeting
on April 15, 1980 with Allan Keen and the Mayor. A check for
$50.00 representing the filing fee and a zoning map relating
the parcels to be changed to the existing plat of Lakeview
Hills, Phase 1 are also enclosed.
Inasmuch as we are proceeding with the voluntary rezoning
of the property which the city requested be rezoned, I would
like to proceed with the annexation of the approximately 34
acre tract for which a voluntary petition of annexation into
the City of Clermont was filed January 21, 1980 on behalf of
Richard R. Swann, Trustee, the owner of record. If you desire,
written assurances that the rezoning petition will not be
withdrawn upon grant of the annexation petition can be obtained
from Mr. Swann, the record owner of the property. Please
advise if there is anything else you would like before we can
move forward with the annexation.
Very truly/,,,r;,
J S G. WILLARD
JGW:gm
Enclosure
cc: Allan E. Keen
Memo tot Clermont City Council
Proms George D. Portion - City Manager
Subjects Annexation of Richard R. Swann Property
Data: February 8. 1980
Enclosed is Ordinance No.126M regarding the annexation of the following property.
"Tracto 8 and 9 and that part of Tracts 7 and 10 lying Wont of Highway No. 27.
according to Lake Highlands Plat of Section 92, Townohip 22 South, Range 26 East,'
all in Lake County. Florida."
This property in located junt South of the Lakeview hills subdivision (see
attached Map). Richard Swann has petitioned the City for the Voluntary Annex-
ation of the above property.
Section 171.044 of the Florida Statutes allows for the voluntary annexation of
property by Ordinance as long as such Ordinance has been published for once a
week for four consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation within
the City.
Respectfully,
Ji /:�
George D. Forbes - City Manager
'SWANN, SWANN AND HAD., CK, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUN5ELLOR6 AT LAW
600 COURTLAND SYRC[7
ORLANDO, rLOR1OA 3E804
pCRVIC PRICE SWANN 7[LtI4IUN[ 130[168[•39S0 '
RICHARD ROCKWELL. SWANN
COWARD CLLIS MADOOCR, JR,
TMOMAS r, LAND January 25, 1900
ORIAN D. HILL
,.ATRICIA A. RCTMWILL ,
JAMES D, WILLARD '
Mr. George D- Forbes
Clermont City Manager
P. O. Box 219
Clermont, Florida 32711
Res Annexation and Re -zoning of Property owned by
Richard R. Swann, Trustee
Dear Mr. Forbes:
This letter will serve as a reaffirmation of the January
11 1980 Petition for Annexation of the Lake County property
described in the attached Schedule "A" into the city limits
of Clermont. The original petition was filed pursuant to
F.S. 5171.044 by my attorney, James G. Willard, on behalf of
the undersigned.
As stated in the original petition, I would request the
property be rezoned R-3 as soon as possible following the
annexation.
Ve tr y">�
1-
ICNARD S N, as Trustee
PROPERTY TO BE ANNEXED INTO THE CITY OF CLERMONT
Tracts 8 and 9, and that part of Tracts 7 and 10
lying West of Highway No. 27, according to Lake
Highlands Plat of Section 32, Township 22 South,
Range 26 East, all in Lake County, Florida.
i
SCHEDULE "A"
i
CITY OF CLERMONT
P.O. BOX 21D CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711 • PHONE 004/394.4001
LEGAL NOTICE
The City of Clermont shall consider the enactment of the following
proposed Ordinance at their meeting to be held on Tuesday, July 8, 1980
at approximately 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers located on the corner
of DeSoto Street and West Avenue:
PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 126-M
AN ORDINANCE UNDER THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT,
LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA PROVIDING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF A CERTAIN PARCEL
OF LAND CONTIGUOUS TO THE PRESENT CITY BOUNDARIES AS DESCRIBED HEREIN:
Tracts 8 and 9, and that part of Tracts 7 and 10
lying West of Highway No. 27, according to Lake
Highlands Plat of Section 32, Township 22 South,
Range 26 East, all in Lake County, Florida.
This Ordinance is available for public inspection in the Office of the
City Clerk, #1 Westgate Plaza, Clermont, Florida, Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
Sandra 0. Rozar, City Clerk
City of Clermont, Florida
June 5, 1980
June 12, 1980
June 19, 1980
June 26, 1980
•tl ��"1 .•r':.rrr•t'rtt�=�••L•t�rS••tr' }{-i-l."�.� � 1 ��-..-. I,
� t I.t.:OG.'I�:tir:~+•-'-7�'� •ti. rpl �'{,n �V ,�'••�'+- �;�.✓ �,.�«w..�r.�. ��...
Ir
'a: .i.�a. ,' �•�:F=,;:•' .r-1.; ;� :u �,; is-,�� .j �\.
Lz
Cn
dp it
'li�•:J i, ^"I••-!,L'. 'AIM!=4
'j st. �,i.t,;••-yrti,,, + � •._�• �� � . •i � I I � � l I r• � I Il t
,. R �- ' 11
^CAI E: I"n 900' f R .N'T •CIT�*tt
0
• t 1 I 1 6y � .� ,�.
I
ItEQUliS'I' POR �. C.UU.P.�API'IIOVAI,
OWNER:
Ilerburt L. Hogers
APPLICANT:
Lld<c Itl.ghl.andn NurnlnR Nonw
PROPER'fy:
151.-161 hart Mlnnehaha
LOCATION:
South of Bast lli.n,eh aha - Between Drew and East Avenue
ZONING:
95% :Ln H-3 Zone plus a 90 x 1.47 Lot [11 a R-1.-A Zone
REQU]'ST:
Conditional Use Perlilit for Lhc conaL'ruatioll Of 11 new
60 Bed and 24 i'sfficlency Unit, three story addi.tlou at
the Lake Ilighlancls Nursing Ilanle.
COMMENTS:
Section 26-87 (I]) and (C) of the Zoning Ordinance sets forth
the standards by which Conditional Use PormiLs Lire to be Judged, The City
may groat a
Conditional Use Permit provided:
1. The proposed Use is desirable at the particular location.
2. Such Us will not be detrimental to the health, safety,
or general welfare of persons residing in the vicinity.
3. The proposed Use will comply with the regulations and
"
codes for such use.
-1 1 Use willnot-adversely --- ----
4. Tile granting of the Condit ona
affect the officially adopted Comprehensive Plan of the
City.
The Nursing Home has revised their site plans as requested by the Planning
and Zoning Commission at the May 6, 1980 meeting. I believe that they
have made every effort to insure that the proposed addition meets the above
conditions, and I would recommend that this request be approved on Lila
following conditions:
1. PARKING: The grass parking to the South of this develop-
ment will be paved within 180 days if determined by the City Council at
a later date, that the intensive use of these parking areas require paved
parking. Any work on property Zoned R-1-A must conform to the City's Zoning
Ordinances. See attached memo from the Building Inspector regarding park-
ing requirements.
2. A SIDEWALK must be constructed to City standards by the
owner around the entire Nursing home as shown on the attached plans.
3. All applicable Regulations and Ordinances be met.
4. The use not be expanded except with a Conditional Use Permit.
5. All conditions be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
Page 2
C.U.P. APPROVAL, - Hurbort I,. Rogcra
Lulce IlLghInnds Nurning Rome
May 15, 1.900
G. Since the proposed building Ln very clone to or attached
to the existing buildings, the existing fneL.I.Ltics must conform to the
standards of the Fire + life Safety Portions of the Southern Standard Build-
ing Code.
PRr4V'LOUS ACTION, At the May 20th, 1.980 Special Meeting of the
Planning and Zoning Comminsi0n, the P & Z voted unanimously to recommend
approval of this rcquest.
This recomendation is based on the above nix conditions and that:
1. The present building be facelifted as shown on the Archi-
tects Conceptual Plans.
2. The visual appearance of the Shed to the South of the
property he upgraded in appearance.
Respectfully,
b-111,
George D. Forbes
City Manager
GDF:pm
CITY OF CLERMONT
P.O. BOX 210 • CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711 • PHONE 904/394.4001
Memo to: City Manager
From: Harvey Nagel
Subject: Highland Nursing Home
151 E. Minnehaha
Parking Requirements
Date: May 23, 1980
Proposed location is in a R-3 Zone
Section 26-24-C1-G-4 - Off Street Parking
Spells out Clinics and Nursing Homes shall have one (1) park-
ing space for each four (4) beds plus one (1) space for each
staff or visiting Doctor, plus one (1) space for each four -(4)- .----=
employees, including Nurses.
Parking Requirements
Existing Nursing Beds 82
Proposed Nursing Beds 60
Proposed Efficiency Rooms 24
TOTAL 1 66
;4
REQUIRED 41 Spaces for Beds
REQUIRED 15 Spaces for employees
TOTAL REQUIRED 56 Spaces
71 Parking Spaces Available
Al_Spaces Available for Beds
30 Spaces available for Doctors, Nurses and employees.
Respectfully,
Harvey Nagel.
Building Official
HN: pm
s
i
LEOL NOTICE
Notice is hereby given to all concerned that the Clermont
Planning t Zoning Coininission shall hold cora Public Hearing
in the Council Chambers locatedonF`101900nat 7er f30�Pthinv�'�rue
and Desoto Streets on Tuesday, May Ma 13, 1gAll
and a final hearing by the City Council on Tuesday, Y
at 7:3.9 P.M. for the following purpose:
for
To consider a request of Lake Nighlands Nursing iidlescrihed as:
a Conditional Use Permit to utilize the property
Lots 11 - Clermont Neights
Lots ue
ontheWest andDrew Avenunon
ebdAnthe
East and Minnehaha on the North)
for the construction and operation of an R2 Bed Nursing Addition
facility in an R-3 Zoning District. .
All interested persons will be given an opportunity to express
their views on the matter.
Sandra D. Rozar, City Clerk
City of Clermont, Florida
April 24, 1980
A copy of the plans are available for your review in the
office of the City Manager
Adak
Lei 00
CITY OF CILERMONT
P.O. BOX 210 • CLEnMONT, FLOMDA 32711 • PHONE 004/304.4001
LEGAL NOTICE
Notice is hereby given to all concerned that the Clermont City
Council shall hold a Public Hearing in the Council Chambers
located on the corner of West Avenue and DeSoto Streets on Tuesday,
May 27, 1980 at 7:30 p.m. for the following purpose:
To consider a request of Lake Highlands Nursing Nome for a Con-
ditional Use Permit to utilize the property described as:
Lots 11 - Clermont Heights
Lots (See Legal bounded by East Avenue on the West
and Drew Avenue on the East and Minnehaha on
the North)
for the construction and operation of an 82 Bed Nursing Addition
facility in an R-3 Zoning District.
All interested persons will be given an opportunity to express
their views on the matter.
Little Sentinel, May 23, 1980
a
Sandra 0. Rozar, City Clerk
City of Clermont, Florida
10joa
90
EXISTING SHED
ol
P ROPOSED
.--,. - � - .
LAUNDRY
BUILDINO
a
I
w
OC
Im
47
V ,R9' WARK*l
iF
\� SCREENED P ` aH
0
0 �PROPOSED PROPOSED
\ \ \DINING' A KITCHEN
\ > s ACTIVITIES x\
M C \ 1-8T DRY. \\\
w \ 'EXI8TIN0,
h aj` w CORRIDOR
0
CL
1 cc
I� s LANDSCAPE COURT
�If11�'h N — - --- - -- - -
PROPOSED 3 STORY ADDITION G I 0
I W
1.3 8'- 0" ¢ _
0 I 0
A 8` 1l'L v
< -- - — - -- --- — -- - --- J O
YO'A T E.
�b
H EXISTIIN
N w ASPH_ALT,I
w 364.66' DRIVE 1
-------------
o
m
I ti
r
H' A A V- E N U E
.-SITE PLAN 11,ALRs 20,-0.
NURSING HOME
w
Z
w
a'
NO 71 CARS
,QUEST FOR Vnr1.nnee
Date: May 15, 1980
OWNER: .ferry Mailan
APPLICANT: Same
PROPERTY: Lot 12 - Block C Edgewood Subdivision
LOCATION: 220 Disaton Street
ZONING: R-1-A Single Family
REQUEST: Construction of Screened Room that will penetrate 5'6" into the
required 25' rear yard setback.
COMMENTS: There has been many other variances granted with similar hardships
in this Subdivision
Respectfully,
George D. Forbes
City Manager
GDF:pm
Enclosures
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE
TO THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJ iNT '3
-OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLva1DA 1 '
APPLICANT o
NAME: MnIlan
ADDRESS: 220 Dieoton et. Clermont
Gentlemen: G � of,q�
foj
Having 'postethe necessary $25.00 appeal fee with the City Clerk, I hereby make
application to your Board for relief from a decision of the Building Official of the City
of Clermont, whereby I was refused permission to:
Repair ( ). Add to (2 ), Alter ( ), Construct ( ), Move and Place ( ), a (sign) building
on lots 12 , Block 0
Subdivision Osatr►ge-�iaa.l' , Address 220 Diseton St. ,Zone R i
Section of Code 2 L- 2l- ^ 3-- in the City of Clermont, Florida.
The reason given by the Building Official for the decision in refusing to issue a
building permit is:
Rear eat -bank insufficient
Request variance from 25 ft. to 19 ft. 6 in.
My appeal to your Board is based on my contention that this decision creates a
hardship on me for the following reason, or reasons:
This makes it impossible to build a screen room, that will accomodate
standard outdoor furniture.
Seven (7) copies of all necessary floor plans, plot plans, and other pertinent infor-
mation are attached hereto, on paper size B�" x 14" minimum size.
1 submit that I qualify for this variance because I have an exceptional and unique
hardship on my particular parcel of land that is not shared by property owners in my area.
A strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives me of the reasonable use of my land
and the granting of this variance will not alter the essential character of the area.
I have been notified that this Variance Application must be filed with the City Clerk
no later than 5:00 P.M. on Friday, two (2) weeks prior to the Council meeting at which time
Variance will be considered. I also understand that when any variance is granted, constructiei
of the structure must be completed within one year from date of grant. I
Date: 8 Lay 1980
Very truly yours,
5/17/77
;� .. /07,
1
• � ��, ao I l7 ► ss Ta tiJ ST.
ei.c►e w,00r;
'N c c. o 5 cr*2E..
1
Io K HO
I E.rilsn►� ►°
r <, �,��
Jorry Mailont Varianco
Notion to Property Owners
Jesse L. Madden
Bishop Poirit
Clermont"`-4
Orville F. LaSalle
230 Disston Ave.
Clermont
Ike S. Greene
240 Disston Ave.
Clermont
Hunter J. Leitch
209 Edgewood Dr.
Clermont
Harvey N. Kidd
233 Edgewood Dr.
Clermont
Waldman Kurt
722 Woodland St.
Winter Garden, F1. 32787
Wilbur F. Montgomery
221 Disston Ave.
Clermont
Joan Gibbons
231 Disston Ave.
Clermont
James H. Cahill
221 Edgewood Dr.
Clermont
a
..� i
IEQUEST FOR _yARTANCL
Date: Dlny I L.U13➢,.._.
UWNER: Vernon M. Cill
APPLICANT: Same
PROPERTY: Attached Survey and Legal Description
LOCATION: 1728 Nita Place
i
ZONING: R-1-A Single Family
i
Rf•.QUEST: Approval to locate house at the seventy foot building, line, whereas
100' is required
I
COMMENTS: The lot size of this property meets the requirements for the Zoning
Ordinance, and a home could be placed farther back on the 'lot to
meet the Zoning Setback requirements. However, this would require
— the home to be placed closer to the Canal, and it would not conform
to the City's flood regulations. The City presently requires all "
lakefront homes to have a rear yard of 25' from the high water mark,
and have the lowest floor elevated 18" above the 100 year Flood Zone
levels. It would not be possible for a home to meet these requirements
if it were placed farther back on•the lot, and many other lakefront
owners have received variances for these same reasons.'
Respectfully,
George D. Forbes
City Manager
GDF:pm
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE
TO THE ZONING BOARD OF ,STMENT
OF THE CITY OF CLERMONI, .i.ORIDA
APPLICANT
NAME: Vernon M. Gill Gant, 16 .7 h
ADDRESS: 1728 Nita Place S•��•d°
Gentlemen:
Having ponied the necessary $25.00 appeal fee with the City Clerk, I hereby make
application to your Board for relief from a decision of the Building Official of the City
of Clermont, whereby I was refused permission to:
Repair ( ), Add to ( ), Alter ( ), Construct ( g), Move and Place ( ), a (sign) buildinc
on lot/s AYT.,. / Ma , A -el fgywdl . Block VnTs: pfli��ie�
Subdivision p•iA, WA�.0 , Address Nl n pl:,��
,Zone R1A
Section of Code 26-20 C-2 in the City of Clermont, Florida.
The reason given by the Building Official for the decision in refusing to issue a
building permit is:
Site plans non -conforming to 100' building line set back in a R I A zone
as prescribed in Section 26-20-C-2.
hardshiMy p onpmeaforotheufollowingsrea on,based oormreasonsntion that this decision creates a
Tocomply with the requirements for a 100' Lot width at the front
building line, the building, would have to be set back to within just
a few feet of the high water mark. A building cannot be set back
far enough on this lot to comply with this restriction.
Seven (7) copies of all necessary floor plans, plot plans, and other pertinent infor-
mation are attached hereto, on paper size %11 x 14" minimum size.
I submit that I qualify for this variance because I have an exceptional and unique
hardship on my particular parcel of land that is not shared by property owners in my area.
A strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives me of the reasonable use of my land
and the granting of this variance will not alter the essential character of the area.
I have been notified that this Variance Application must be filed with the City Clerk
no later than Variance will be0considered. I alsotwo
understandweeks
that when any variancer to the Council mistgrantedat which
constructio
of the structure must be completed within one year from date of grant.
Date:
— d
Very truly yours,
5/17/77
Vernon N. Gills Variance
Notice to property owners
William W. Boyd
P.O. Boy, 393
Clermont.,..;
Frances M. Campbell
324 Lamplighter Lana
Marietta, Ga. 30062
Wilbur B. Lnagston
Rt. 2 Box 700
Clermont, F1.
Itelena F. Nowell
592 Lakeshore Dr.
Clermont
Lloyd Whitlock
P.O. Box 402
Clermont
Alice Tilden
P.O. Box 527
Clermont
Donald H. Campbell
324 Lamplighter Lane
Marietta, Ga. 30062
Allen Kirk
2812 N. W. 55th Ave.
Apt. 20
Lauderhill, F1. 33313
Mrs. L. W. Watson
465 Lakeshore Drive
Clermont
n
LAKe Sllop
L...�iz�vc
--
`n`�69,O, � \ ME..�!.: �•-:J l.•LT L°;1 .—fit.: p_,
9.F 2i
5% 1S/&O
1'4"
Description: That certain parcel of land that is shown, Net j
Included on the plat of Point Place as recorded in Plat Book i
14, Page 2B, Public Recorda of Lake County, Florida.
Le_s- and Except: Begin at the intersection of the Southerly
Lirne Street with the We>--rly flight-oF-
Right-oF-Way line of I
Vlay line of Nita Piar_e; t'�-nce N.62°00'W. along said Southerly '
Right-oF-Way line of Lime Street, 170.00 Feet; thence 5.S°Oa'w.. -
a 1 37 .. - 3. ;r °OO t E . r3 d::>t. mn 'e of 170 Feet
`� ',c -_n. .�_„ld _ i ?v,Fi`•^.t-aF-lJ.�y Sine ^F Nita Place' I
Uw 'L: U6' E. _ line 137 I
Feat to tin. Faint cr Er -Inning. )
t
urn s 1 r Ci {C'S . 1 iC.
_ f J-SL-?-�c�I2•�^•� I - r� G
•IAdIL
ORDINANCE NO. _ 206-C
AN ORDINANCE UNDER THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA. AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING
MAP OF THE CITY OF CLERMUNT, FLORIDA; REZONING THE HHAL
PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN FROM A TRANSITION ZONE CLASSIFICATION;
REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABLLITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT HEREBY ORDAINS TRAT:
SECTION 1.
The Official Zoning Map of the City of Clermont, Lake County, Florida, is hureby
amended by rezoning the following described property from transition none Classification
to M-1 industrial classification,
Lots I through 9, and 16 through 22, of Block 119, City of Clermont;
Lots 1 through 13, of Block 120, City of Clermont, and that portion of
Osceola Street now closed between Blocks 119 and 120, leas the Westerly
122 feet;
Lots 1 through 19, of Block 115, City of Clermont;
Property bounded on the South by Lakeshore Drive, East by Lake Minneola, s
West by Twelfth Street, and North by the easterly extension of the North
line of Block 145, City of Clermont;
iI
That parcel bounded on the West by Block 115. bounded on the North by
railroad right-of-way, bounded on the East by West Avenue, bounded on
the South by Osceola Street and shores of West Lake; and
That parcel bounded on the West by Eleventh Street, bounded on the North
by Carroll Street, bounded on the East by the shores of West Lake,
bounded on the South by Minneola Avenue.
SECTION 2.
The Official Zoning Map of the City of Clermont, Lake County, Florida, is hereby
-i
amended by rezoning the following described property from transition zone classificatiol
to C-1 light commercial:
Lots 1 and 2, of Block 118, and Lots 10 through 26, of Block 120, and that
portion of Osceola Street now closed, lying between lots 14 and 15, City
of Clermont.
SECTION 3. 4
The Official Zoning Map of the City of Clermont, Lake County, Florida, is hereby
amended by rezoning the following described property from transition zone classificatioi
to R-3 multiple family. I
That property lying North of the railroad right-of-way, West of Eighth
Street, and South of the Easterly extension of the North line of Block
145 and the shores of Lake Minneola, except lots 4 through 7, of Block
117, City of Clermont;
Lots 1 through 6, of Block 94, except that portion of lots r and 2 that
is City owned property; and
Lots 9 through 20, of Block 93, City of Clermont.
HOVIS AND BAIRD, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, P.C. DRAWER 848, CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711
SECTION 4.
The Official Zoning Map of the City of Clermont, Lake County, Florida, is hereby
amended by rezoning thu following described property from transition zone classification,
to C-2 general commercial:
Lots 1 through B. of Block 97, City of Clermont.
SECTION 5.
The Official Zoning Map of the City of Clermont, Lake County, Florida, is hereby
amended by rezoning the following described property from trnnaltion zone three to
R-7 multiple family:
Block 14, Sunset Heights; land between Block 14 end Lake Minneola, land
between Block 14 and Palm Street, Sunset Heighta. i
SECTION 6.
All Ordinances or parts of this Ordinance in conflict herewith are hereby
repealed.
SECTION 7.
Should any section or part of this section be declared invalid by any Court of
competent jurisdiction, such adjudications shall not apply or affect any other provision
of this Ordinance, except to the extent that the entire section or part of the section
I
may be inseparable in meaning and effect from the section to which ouch holding shall
apply.
SECTION 8.
I
This Ordinance shall be published as provided by law and it shall become law and
shall take effect immediately upon its Second Reading and Final Passage.
First Reading this day of 1980.
Second Reading this day of , 1980.
PASSED AND ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY,
!i
FLORIDA, THIS DAY OF , 1980. t
CITY OF CLERMONT
BY:
CLAUDE E. SMOAK, JR., Mayor
ATTEST:
SANDRA 0. ROZAR, City Clerk
HOVIS AND BAIRD, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, P.O. DRAWER 848, CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711
APPROVED by me this ,_,__,day of , 1900.
CLAUDE Ii. SMOAK, .IN., Mayor
CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION
I IIERLBY CERTIFY that a certified copy of the foregoing Ordinance No.
was published on the day of , 1980, in a newspaper of general
circulation located within the City of Clermont, as required by Florida Statutes 166.140
(J)(a), said date of publication being 14 days prior to the Second Reading and Final
Adoption of the Ordinance.
SANDRA 0. ROZAR, City Clark
ORDINANCE NO. 200-C
AN ORDINANCE UNDER THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING APPENDIX A, %ONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLNRMONTI REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES
IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITYI PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATEI AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT HEREBY ORDAINS THAT:
SECTION la
Appendix A of the Code of Ordinancou, City of Clermont, is
hereby amonded to road as follows:
A. Sea attached schedule which is incorporated and made a
part horcof.
SECTION 2:
All ordinances or parts of this Ordinance in conflict herewith
are hereby repealed.
SECTION 3:
Should any section or part of this section be declared invalid
by any Court of competent jurisdiction, such adjudications shall
not apply or affect any other provision of this Ordinance, except
to the extent that the entire section or part of the section may
-.- be inseparable in meaning and effect from the section to which
such holding shall apply.
SECTION A:
This Ordinance shall be published as provided by law and it
shall become law and shall take effect 30 days after its Second
Reading and Final Passage.
First Reading this day of. , 1980.
Second Reading this day of , 1980.
PASSED AND ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT,
LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, THIS DAY OF , 1980.
CITY OF CLERMONT
BY:
CLAUDE E. SMOAK, JR., Mayor
ATTEST:
I APPROVED by me this Jay of 19110,
CLAUNd I„ SMOAK, dit., Mayer
CEWrIFICATI; OF PUBLICATION
I IIERERY CEIITI". that a certified copy of the foregoing ordinaneu No.
was published on the day of , 1980, in a newspaper of general
circulation located within the City of Clermont, no required by Florida Statutos 166.14
(3)(a), said data of publication bein!; 14 days prior to the Second Rending and Final
Adoption of the Ordinance.
SANDRA 0. ROlAR, City Clcrk
Numo Lo: Clermont City C011ncll.
From: City Planngor
Subject: Zoning and S1.11n Ordina"COn
Date: May 23, 1.980
Attached is n su:mnary of the proposed revisions to the City Zoning Ordinance.
Please review the summery, and the Ordinances that were previously d.l.stributed to
Council Plembers. I realize theca tiro lengLhy documents and 111.0116e feel free to
contact me if you have any questions.
Attached are .letters from Bell Ceramics and Blua Goose regarding the Transition
Zonc.
In response to Public comments and suggestions by City Council mmnbers, I would.
suggest that the proposed revisions be adopted with the following amendments to
Ordinance 208-C.
1 Section 26-1 - Zoning Districts. The words C-1 Neighborhood Commercial
District be replaced with C-1 Light Commercial District.
2 Section 26-38 - Existing Lots - An asterlcic be placed following the word
Ordinance and at the bottom of thepagethe words:"*Lot of record.. as of
September 10, 1968." This is necessary to explain that existing lots, if
platted previously to September 10, 1968, may still be used as a building
site provided all the yard requirements of the Zoning Ordinance are met.
3 Section 26-23 - Extension of Parking Space into Residential District.
Item (5), Number 4 be added to state, "'file above provisions shall also apply
to properties in which a Conditional Use Permit 1s granted." This is necessary
to ensure that Conditional Uses allowed in Residential Zones can also
utilize parking in any Residential Zone.
4 Article XVII Part D Item 4 - Lot Coverage. The word feel' is changed
to percent. This provision explains lot coverage and the proper term should
be percent.
5 Article XVIII C-1 Zone Section D Part 5 - Dwelling Units. This item
should be placed as a Permitted Use instead of a Conditional Use in a Light
Commercial Zone. This is consistent with the intent of the C-1 Zoning,
and will avoid unnecessary Conditional Use Permit's since many Single Family
homes exist in areas proposed as C-1 in our changes from Transition Zoning.
Any home modified or built- would still be required to meet the requirements
of the R-3 Residential Zone.
6. C-2 General/Central Business District Part C Conditional Uses. The
Conditional Uses could be amended to require Shopping Centers to be considered
only as a Conditional Use. This would allow the City to consider the impact
on the community of any Shopping Center development, and Shopping Centers.
would be defined as: Shopping Centers - Any group of five or more businesses
with shared parking/in which the total land area of the development exceeds
five acres.
i
Pape 2
I4cmu to: Clermont CLLy Councl.l,
From; CLLy Manager
Date: May 29, .1.980
7. M-.I [nduatriol Zone l.'_arL IS Permitted Uses, Item 9. It hna been
suggested that rooLrleting Crove-9crviccs and Overnite TruclUng 1:0 M-1,
Induatrlal ZoncS IS too rentrictivc, and that better defined Truck Routco
may be a better way to handle 'trucking RclpaLed problems.
Respectfully, ✓
Ccorge'U. Forbes
City Manager
CDP:pm
Enclosures
PROp(lUBO Rulhl(1M; 'ro CITY 7011im;
ORDIRANCM, AND ZONING OINTRICI'I;
'fho Planning, and Zoning Commtasion of the Clty of Clermont (p 6 7.) han been review
Inl; the City Zoning Ordinance in order to better nerve the commim ity, The Commia-
alaD bulleven that the City'd Zoning ordlnanco In hnnlvally Wound but III need of
nnme ravlslona to insure that it motto the novda of our community.
In rM swing the Zoning Ordlnnnoe, we kept to mind that 'y,anlnf; Regulatlnnn nhunld
be pruclsu; and worded In nuch it mnnorr IhM can bc• Letter undvrstuud by our
cttiruna, an well as enforced by the (!fly.
Zonlo Revinlonn. The fallowing In n aumnun•y of the major ravltiiuos to
the Zoning Ordinance.
1. Transition Zonon. In June of 1969, the (;lty cntnblinhed three
Trnnultion Zones sit port of the city's Zoning Ordinance. 'rite purpone of these
Transition Zones were to allow oxinting UnrH within there zones to remain for it
puriud of fifteen yearn, after whlr;h time nil unes were to conform with the ragnire-
menta of the R-3 Multiple Family Zone,
'Thin meann that in .little of 19R4, All of the unrn In the 'trannitlon Znnrn must (1an-
form to the Uses permitted in the Multlpla t'Anilly Zoua. This does not allow for
the lnduntries And Buslneauen presently located within three Zones, many of which
have been expanded or improved nince 1961).
it Ia the intent of the Planning and Zoning commisslon to remove the Transition
Zoned from the Zoning Ordinance, and rezone thane properticH in a manner that
would reflect the highest Lind beat Use in our community. Attached is a map of the
proposed zoning changes for these areas,
2. Format. The Zoning Districts have been placed inn nchedulyd type
format with the regulations pertaining to n Zoning District on one page. Thin
will clarify the District Regulations and eliminate file need to search throughout
the Ordinance for the District Regulations.
3. Residential Zones. The Residential Zoning Districts are essentially
unchanged with two exceptions.
the R1AA Zone hall been eliminated. There is no property In the City Ilmlts zoned
H1AA, and we do not contemplate any property In the future or presently In need of
such zoning. The R1AA Zone provided for minimum lot sizes of 15,000 square feet,
and allowed only Single Family Residences. The basic intent of this district
was to insure that as the City expanded, the City Zoning was consistent with the
Count,v 'Zoning outnlde of the City limits. However, we have reviewed this matter
and the Zoning in the County, and no longer betlevr that such A district Iv
necessary.
We are also recommending that the R3A and R3 Zones be combined into one Zone
known as R-3. The R-3 Residential Professional District And RM Townhouse Districts
are essentially the same Zones with one exception. The R3 Zone allow, Professional
Offices, but only as a Conditional Use, These two zones have been combined into
one zone that allows Professional Offices as a Conditional Use. The only other
major change in that the lot width nt the building setback line for duplexes was
reduced from 100' to 75'.
4. Commercial 'Zones.
C-1 - Neighborhood Commercial District. The Neighborhood Cununercial-
District is intended for small neighborhood retail businesses that are located
adjacent to residential neighborhoods. 'These Uses would be -permitted as long as
they did not occupy more than 3,000 square feet of fluor space. The totem of
this, Zone is to allow for light retail services that would not be detrimental to
abutting residences. This Zone would generally he located Along major roads other
than Highway 50 and 27, and should become particularly Important an the Clly grows
to the South.
C-2 - General Commercial District. The General Commercial District
is intended for full scale Retail Sales that service the needs of the entire
community. The General Commercial Districts fa and will continue to be properties``
that abut Highways 50 and 27, Retail Business, Professional Offices, Automotive
Sales, Hotels, Restaurants, and related Unen are allowed in this zone.
`i:
14iµe 2
Proposed Revisiona to City Zoning
Ordinance and Zoning Districto
5, industrial Dlntrictn, The City Zoning Ordiontrn pronrntly provide"
far two Industrial Districts, one In n light and ilia other it medium Induatrinl
We believe that the lnterento of the City could lip bettor nerved by hawing only
one Industrial Dfutrlct, Thin district would entnhllnh porformanee ntandardn for
the type of industries allowed no n Pormlttrd or Condltionnl Une.
Thu proposed Industrial Dintrict pot•mlto light manufacturing, nnnumbliop, or packag-
Ing, tin long not such work is conducted within n vompletuly rnrloned building with
a total maximum floor space of 7,000 square feet or lens, 00ior Unon or manufac-
turing plants greater than 7,000 square feet In aren could be Permitted tin u Con-
dltlonal Una, provided that they can meat the Conditional Ban etandnrdn estnblished
fit the Ordinance.
6. Other Chanren.
Mobile Home Parks. The minimum size of it Mobile home Park of oil( -
sere was established. Also, the setbacks for Mobile homes from a public nft•vrt
wall revised to be consistent with other Zones. The front yard setback In 50, on
Highways 50 and 27, and 25 feat on other public streets,
Purkino. The parking requirements• for single family homes have
been clarified to insure that adequate parking spaces are provided.
7. Sign Ordinance. The proposed Sign,Ordinance hall very Cow chaugea.
'rho main recommendation of the Commission in to ndopt the proposed Sign Code
Ordinance and separate It from the Zoning, Ordfnance. This had several advantages
in that it would allow us to place the code In an easily rendable format that makes
the Sign Code much easier to understand than breaking the Code up under all of the
various Zoning Districts.
The other major revisions are that the Off Premise Signs Provisions have been
clarified to only allow such signs in vncnnt property. Off-alte signs nlxty- - -
four (64) square feet in area or less munt be a minimum of 200' from any other
off -site signs on the same side of the street. Off -site signs greater than
64 square feet must be 1,000 from any other off -site sign.
The Ground Sign Provisions were nlso modified to allow Ground Signs lower than
9' In height to be located in front of the building setback line. However, these
signs cannot exceed 32 square feet in area and must not be cloner to the street
than one-half of the required front yard setback.
Conclusion. The above revisions have been carefully considered by the
Planning and Zoning Commission as in tine beat interests of our community. We
welcome public comment on these proposals. The Planning and 'Zoning commission is
an advisory body to the City Council. Final consideration of these proposed
changes must be adopted by the City Council of the City of Clermont by Ordinance.
PIANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
of the City of Clermont
Members:
Ruth Alice Ray, Chairman
Henry Czech, Vice Chairman
Mike Conley
Laura Cook
:Vick Jones
Louise Relyea
Jack Sargent
Bob Thompson
Alfred Wilcox
GDF: pm _ ,
AW-1k
WV*► O, CITY OF CLERMONT
P.O. BOX 219 • CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711 e PHONE 904/304-4001
May 22, 1980
R. Dewey Burneed
McLin & Burnsed
Attorneys and Couneelora at Law
1000 West Hain Street
Leesburg, Florida 32748
Dear Mr. Burnsed:
I have discussed with the Mayor and informed City Council
members of your request that the Council take no formal
action on the Bell Ceramics property at our Public Hearing,
May 27, 1980.
I have received no objections to this request; however, a
representative of Bell Ceramics should be present at the
Public Hearing.
We plan to place this item on the Council Agenda of June
24, 1980 meeting for final action.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions,
please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
George D. Forbes
City Manager
GDF:pm
cc: Richard Bell
ME
McLiN ill I11JBNHI:I)
I'Mor NN/IONAL AN11oC1ATION
ATTORNMY16 AND CODNNSIVA NN AT LAW
I.. WONT MAIN OTNNtT
LaD■DUDD, FLONIDA OOTAO
WA1XXN S. INWN, LD ►OAT O►►ICt ONAWtt 1061
■.DOWLT DUNNAAD ANNA COnt ooa
tTANLtT t, NAtAD" TALI►114Nt M►•1417
"ND A. NONNISON May 8, 1980 �0
iy
Mr. George Forbes, City Manager
City Clermont v
1 Westgate
ate Plaza L
Clermont, Fla. 32711
Rol Bell Ceramics, Rezoning
Dear Mr. Porbosl
As you are award, I represent�Boll Ceramics in conjunction with this
rezoning matter. We are presently scheduled to appear before you on
your May 27 meeting. It is.my understanding that you are going to
have a meeting on May 13. We.do request on, behalf of Bell ceramics
a postponement of one month. Tho reason for thin -request is that we
need additional time within which to gather the information necessary
for our -presentation to you.
In addition to the foregoing, it is my understanding that you are
going to have a June;,election to fill the°unexpired term of councilman
Meginley and by your second meeting in Juno yoU should have a full
Council.
We would greatly appreciate it if you would take up this request for
postponement at your first meeting in May in order that we will know
whether we will be expected to have to make a presentation at your
May 27 meeting. Your assistance in this matter will be greatly appre-
ciated.
Yn'kul
R. Dews Burnsed
RDB:dac
cc: Mr. Lanny Baird
cc: Mr. Richard Bell
PHONE: 13091 007•4301
_ BL_U_LGOOSE _GROWERS, INC.
000TN CADTERN DIVI3IC
F.O. DOx 1120 . VERO DL'ACH. FLORIDA 32000
May 20, 1980
Mr. George D. Forbes
City Manager q'
City of Clermont ¢
P.O. Box 219
Clermont, FL 32711 ( ,`'y' 'A^I
Dear Mr. Forbes:
At your request, and after our review of many facts relative to the proposed
rezoning of our property, we are strongly opposed to the change to zone
classification R-3 Multiple Family Zone.
Because of the most important reasons summarized below, we suggest your proposed
line of demarcation for R-3 zoning should end on the east perimeter of our property
and not include our parcel which is practically surrounded by light industrial use,
and has been zoned for such continued use:
1. Our property is being used for clean light industry use and is planned
for this continued use for years to come.
2. The Blue Goose operation has had favorable impact on the economic
community of Clermont and will continue to do so - accordingly minor
- alterations and/or changes to our operation might be needed for improve-
ment to best operate for success of the future.
3. For the "best use" zoning plans, we feel it is unappropriate to select
our property for inclusion into R-3 when other industry use (lumber company,
city maintenance facilities, trust mill) border us on most sides.
4. Blue Goose's current and planned operational practice is to moderately
improve the physical plant, appearance - maintenance wise and continue to
direct its flow of truck traffic, as it has in the past, away from Lake
Shore Drive and to heavy use traffic roads.
5. Finally, should we ultimately change someday in the future, our planned
use for the actual real estate, our zoning change request would certainly
be in an upgraded manner.
I respectfully request these comments be given careful consideration at your
May 27th meeting, and my Clermont area manager, Jim Adamson, will be present at
this meeting to present these comments for the record, and answer any questions
the planning board or city commissioners might have relative to this issue.
Sincerely,
q tS' .
J. Brantley Schir d D'
Florida Division anager
JBS/do
cc: Claude E. Smoak, Jr.
Lester Cole
Carlisle A. Byrd, Jr.
Dennis Thomas
Robert Essick, President, Blue Goose Growers, Inc.
LROAI, N(fI'Ila+,
AMENDM,VNTS TO ZONING ORDINANCE
The City Council of the City of Clermont will be conducting a Public
Hearing on Proposed Admendmentn to the City Zoning Ordinance on Tuesday,
May 27, 1980 at 7:70 p.m. in the City Council Chombern, 082 DoSoto Street,
Clermont, Floridn (Public Safety Building).
'l'he purpono of thu Proponed Clungun are to conuldur:
1. Ordinance No. 200-C amending Appendix A, Zoning Ordinance
of tlw City of Clermont.
2. Ordinance No. 206-C amending the official Zoning Map of
Clermont, Florida rezoning real property from Transition Zone
classification to Induntrinl, Multiple Family, Light,nnd Con-
cral Couanercial Diatriet clansifications
PUBLISH IN THE' SOUTH LAKE PRESS April 24, 1980 and
May 15, 1990.
. �' "'I"
i
ORDINANCE NO. 200-C
AN ORDINANCE UNDER THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING APPENDIX A, ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT► REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES
IN CONFLICT HEREWIT111 PROVIDING FOR SEVERAAILITY1 PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE► AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT HEREBY ORDAINS THAT:
SECTION is
Appendix A of the Code of Ordinancos, City of Clermont, is
hereby amended to road as follows:
A. See attached schodulo which is incorporated and made a
part hereof.
SECTION 2:
All Ordinances or parts of thin Ordinance in conflict herewith
are hereby repealed.
SECTION 3:
Should any section or part of this section be declared invalid
by any Court of competent jurisdiction, such adjudications shall
not apply or affect any other provision of this Ordinance, except
to the extent that the entire section or part of the section may
be inseparable in meaning and effect from the section to which
such holding shall apply.
SECTION 4:
This Ordinance shall be published as provided by law and it
shall become law and shall take effect 30 days after its Second
Reading and Final Passage.
First Reading this day of , 1980.
Second Reading this day of . 1980.
PASSED AND ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT,
LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, THIS DAY OF , 1980.
ATTEST:
SANDRA U. R0ZAR, City Clerk
CITY OF CLERMONT
BY:
CLAUDE E. SMOAK, JR., Mayor
1
of , 1.980.
� APPROVED by me this day
CI.AUUR L. SMOAK, -1R., Mayor
CPN'fIT'ICATP OF PUILICAI"
10EREISY CERTIFY that a certified copy of the foregoing Ordinancu 110,
was published on the „__ day of
1980, in a newspaper of general
circulation located within the City of Clermont, as required by Florida Statutes 166.14
(3)(a), said date of publication being 14 days prior to the Second Rending and Final
Adoption of the Ordinance.
SANDRA 0. ROZAR, City Clerk
REQUEST FOR SU13D'LVIST.ON `,,.. CH
Dote:— May 27, 1980
OWNER: Bob Henter
APPLICMIT: Same
I'ItOPlaf1Y; Margaree Gardens Subdivision
LOCATION: South of Settle Street and Lake Shore Drive on property commonly
known as (look Point
ZONING: 11-1—A Single Family
REQUEST: Variance from Chapter 19 of the City Subdivision Ordinance In order
to construct roadside swales on these streets, whereas curb and gutter streets
are required.
COMMENTS: We believe that the City Ordinances are proper in requiring curb and
gutter streets.
The City'ahas already experienced problems in Subdivisions constructed without
curb and gutter, and roadside swales introduce many maintenance problemsas
-
discussed in the attached City Engineer's letter.
Respectfully,
George D. Forbes -
City Manager
GDF:pm ,_
CITY OF CLERMONT
P.O. OOX 219 CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711 • PHONE 904/394.4081
May 14, 1980
MEMO
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: PROPOSED MARGAREE GARDENS SUBDIVISION
E-113
I have studied the question of curbs and gutters vs roadside swales for
the subject development and offer the following comments:
1. In studying the Code of Ordinances of the City of Clermont, it is
obvious that the intent of the Code is to have curbs and gutters
constructed on all City streets. For Example:
Chapter 19 - Article II Sec. 19-16 Grading; Curb - -
In 1st paragraph, In all areas, the ground surface shall slope
uniformly from the property line to the top of the curb and
shall drain to the curb."
2nd paragraph, "Street curbs shall be curb and gutter."
Chapter 19 - Article III, Sec. 19-23, 1st Para.
The purpose of these specifications is to establish a set
of standards for the construction of street curbs for all
street pavements to be constructed within the City Limlts of
the City of Clermont, or in adjacent subdivisions which may
be annexed to the City."
Chapter 20 - Sec. 20-12I(3)
'Concrete curbs and gutters shall be constructed on all streets."
2. Roadside swales introduce several maintenance problems:
a. Until the whole development is completed there is a pro-
blem of maintenance of swale bottom slopes due to construc-
tion on individual lots.
b. Inverts of driveway culverts must be set to conform to
drainage design of swales.
May 14, 1980
MEMO (cont.)
Page 2
c. Driveway culverts plugged with sand from eroded shoulders,
impede drainage flaws when design flows are necessary.
d. Impossible to control homeowners attempts to regrade or
fill in swale in front of his house.
3. The overall appearance of a street with swales is affected
more by different degrees of homeowner maintenance than on a
curbed street.
4: The City has experienced costly re -habilitation problems in sub-
divisions constructed without curb and gutter.
In my opinion the City should adhere to the Code of Ordinances in this matter.'
ao n ringstead, P.E., President
pri gstead and Associates, Inc.
JWS:mm
�nro;a
ABC r-RUIT COMPANY
p gMhl.l'.'r rf Ml.I/It I%TI1'JO Akin WOVI! CA17E1
4oij4 GOUTI-i ORANGE[ AVENUI_
ORLANDO. FLORIDA .12000
1-1. O N C 1 :1 0 H • O U 9 • U 4 7 8
May 21, 1980
Mr, George D. Forbes
City Manager
City of Clermont
P.O. Box 219
Clermont, Florida 32711
Dear Mr. Forbes:
In response to your letter of May 16, regarding the Margaree Subdivision,
I would like to review the following points.
First, Lots 1, 10, 11, 18 and 19, Block B more than meet the minimm'
ec�00ngellohave no t�a
th the
setbakrequiremenas long asyou allow the builder o designate one
side to be front and one side to be rear set backs leaving the two sides
as yard set backs.
As far as the U.S.G.S. Monitoring Stations, their agreement is to remove
the wells upon owner's request with 30 days notice. Without knowing the
exact location in relation to the plat layout, I have made no determination
on what my course will be at this time.
I foresee no problen in meeting the 97.5' high water mark line for rear
building lot setbacks.
Finally, I would like to apply for a variance to your Code Ordinance
wa
I believe that sil drainage will be more desirable than curb and gutter for
the following reasons:
1. The parcel is well drained with excellent percolating soil.
2. The maxima elevation variation being a low of 97.5' Itd, high
of 114.0'
3. This property is relatively flat and will not cause accelerated
runoff and erosion that could occur with parcels of extreme elevation
variations.
4• This type of drainage allows waterpavement to move freely off of the
important,
during stores which aids to
of traffic, but moat
�rtrac leplaOWersces cleaner the velocity of runoff in grass line ctwnnels,
waterpinto aesmaller r tentionarea daasmuch lower volume of
our moat valuable Lake County asset - clean waatteerr� the protection of
i
I I have researched this request very carefully, ping
in keee
interest of all the residents of this chain of awould appreciate
best
any consideration regarding this matter, laks and
�Sine ,
Robert d,Lester,
President