Loading...
05-27-1980 Supporting DocumentsCITY OP CLENIONT MINUTES REGULAR MEE''I.NG A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clermont was held in the Council Chambers an Tuesday, May 27, 1980. The most•- ing was called to order. by Mayor. Claude I. Smoak, Jr.. at 7:30 p.m. with the following Councilman in atlandance: Carlisle Byrd, Lester Cole, and Dennis Thomas. Other City Officials present were City Manager Forbes, City Attorney Baird, Finance Director Saunders and City Clark Rozar. The Invocation was offered by Councilman Byrd, followed by repeating of the pledge of: allegiance by all present. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting held May 13, 1980 were approved as presented. VARIANCE REQUEST: Margarec Subdivision The City Council acting as a Board of Adjustment, considered a request by Bob nester in order to construct roadside swales on the streets of the proposed Margaree Gardens Subdivision, t whereas curb and gutter streets are required. Mr. Hester stated that this land is well suited for swales since it has excellent percolating soils, and being relatively flat will not cause accelerated runoff and erosion that could occur with parcels of extreme elevation variations. He stated further that this practice assists in the protection of our clean water. Mr. John Springstead, City Engineer recommended that the City should adhere to the Code of Ordinances, and stated that roadside swales often introduce several main- tenance problems. Maintenance of swales is difficult to control since the construction and grading of individual lots often damage the swales, and driveway culverts must be set properly to conform to the drainage design. The overall appearance of a street with swales is affected more by different degrees of homeowner maintenance than on a curbed street. Mr. Hester stated that this subdivision would be of such caliber and have such strict covenants governing the maintenance of swales that the above problems would not be a factor. Mr. Springstead stated that swales can be successful if constructed and maintained properly. It was recommended that the Subdivision Ordinance be reviewed con- ! cerning swales as well as curb and gutter streets to provide 6 parameters for the construction of swales, at the City's option. It was determined there was no particular hardship warranting a variance, however, there is sufficient evidence that swales can be adapted efficiently and should be presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration. 80-80 A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN COLE, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT THE REQUEST BE TABLED UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING AND REFERRED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR STUDY AND RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: 151- 161 East Minnehaha Avenue Lake Highlands Nursing home City Manager Forbes spoke concerning the conditional use permit, stating the Nursing Home had revised their site plans as requested by the Planning and Zoning Commission and had met the specifications proposed by them. He rec- ommended the request be approved with eight (8) conditions 0 0 0 CITY OP CLEPAIONT MINUTES REGULAR MEETING that must be followed, outlinod by the Planning and Zoning Commission as listed: 1. Parking: The grass parking to the South of: this development will be paved within 180 days if de- termined by the City Council at• a later date, that the intensive use of these parking areas require paved parking. Any work on properly zoned R-1-A must conform to the City's Zoning Ordinances. 2. A Sidewalk must be constructed to City standards by the owner around the entire Nursing Home. 3. All applicable Regulations and Ordinances be met. 4. The use not be expanded except with a Conditional Use Permit. 5. All conditions prior to the issuance of a Certi- ficate of Occupancy. 6. Since the proposed building is very close to or attached to the existing buildings, the existing facilities must conform to the standards of the Fire + Life Safety Portions of the Southern Standard Building Code. 7. The present building be face lifted as shown on the Architect's Conceptual Plans. 8. The visual appearance of the Shed to the South of the property be upgraded in appearance. Mr. Herbert Rogers spoke relating the desire of the Nursing 80-81 Home for the permit. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN COLE, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED TIiAT THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BE GRANTED. VARIANCE: 1728 Nita Place, Mr. Vernon Gill City Manager Forbes explained the request for approval to locate a house at the seventy foot building line, whereas 100' is required. He commented the lot size meets the re- quirements for the Zoning Ordinance, and a home could be placed farther back on the lot to meet the zoning setback requirements, however, this would require the home to be placed closer to the canal, and would not conform to the City's flood regulations. It would not be possible for a home to meet these :requirements if. it were placed farther back on the lot, and many other lakefront owners have received variances for these same reasons. Mrs. Boyd stated her only opposition would be the encroachment of any lot on Point Place. She stated Lakeshore Drive would be the only access to the lot because Nita Place is a private drive. 80-82 After much discussion, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN COLE AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT THE VARIANCE BE GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE DETERMINATION OF THE LEGAL ACCESS OF THE PROPERTY BY NITA PLACE. -2- CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES REGULAR MEETING VARIANCE•' REQUEST: 220 Disston Street, Mr. Jerry Mcilan A request was received from Mr. Jerry Mcilan for the construction of a screened room that would penetrate 516" into the required 25' rear yard setback. After 80-83 some discussion, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN BYRD, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED TO GRANT THE VARIANCE. ORDINANCE NO. 206-C City Manager Forbes gave a brief summary of the history of this ordinance, explaining the transition zones and the recommendations of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Mr. Jim Adamson of Blue Goose Growers presented the views of that company requesting the area encompassing their property be zoned M-1. After extensive discussion, 80-84 A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN BYRD, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN COLE AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED TO AMEND ORDINANCE NO. 206-C TO ZONE THE PROPERTY UTILIZED BY BLUE GOOSE FROM R-3 TO M-1. A request was made by Bell Ceramics to postpone any action concerning that property until the second meeting in June. 80-85 A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN BYRD, SECONDED BY MAYOR SMOAK AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT THE FIEARING BE CONTINUED UNTIL THE DATE REQUESTED IIY BELL CERAMICS AND THAT THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 206-C BE TABLED UNTIL THE SAME DATE. ORDINANCE NO. 208-C, FINAL READING AND ADOPTION City Manager Forbes explained this Ordinance and recommended changes as listed in his May 23, 1980 memo. After extensive 80-86 discussion, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN COLE AND UNAN- IMOUSLY CARRIED THAT A MOBILE HOME PARK BE REQUIRED TO ENCOMPASS AT LEAST A TEN (10) ACRE PARCEL OF LAND. 80-87 A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN COLS AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT SHOPPING CENTERS BE DEFINED AS ANY GROUP OF FIVE OR MORE BUSINESSES WITH SHARED PARKING OR IN WHICH THE TOTAL LAND AREA OF THE DEVELOPMENT EXCEEDS FIVE ACRES. 80-88 A MOTION WAS MADE BY MAYOR SMOAK, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS-AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT, UNDER CONDITIONAL USES IN THE C-2 ZONE, AGRICULTURALLY RELATED BUSINESSES BE INCLUDED. 80-89 Ordinance No. 208-C was read by Title only and a MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS AND SECONDED BYICOUNCILMAN COLE TO ADOPT THIS ORDINANCE AS AMENDED AS STATED IN THE CITY MANAGER'S ZONING AND SIGN ORDINANCE MEMO, DATED MAY 23, 1110 WITH THE ABOVE CHANGES. COUNCILMAN BYRD VOTING AYE AND MAYOR SMOAK VOTING AYE, THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. -3- es CITY OF CLERYONT MINUTES REGULAR MEETING CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CRIME CLEARANCE T e C ty Manager stated the Uniform Crime Report for the month of April shows the City's clearance rate for crimes at 60% and the recovery of stolen property at 80% for the month. lie commended Chief Tyndal and the Police Department for their outstanding job performance. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Smoak recognized the candadites for the Council Seat to be filled at the Special Election of June 10, 1980. He recommended a factual presentation be published in a local newspaper of the position the Council has officially taken stating the facts considered in making this decision regard- 80-90 ing the Marshland Alternative. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCIL- MAN BYRD, SECONDED IIY COUNCILMAN COLE AND UNANIMOUSLY CAR- RIED THAT THE CITY MANAGER PREPARE A PRESENTATION FOR THE PRESS SUMMARIZING THE FACTS CONSIDERED IN THE CITY COUNCIL'S DECISION IN PURSUING THE MARSHLAND ALTERNATIVE FOR EFFLUENT DISPOSAL. - - - --- -- Mayor Smoak also requested the prevailing candidate be sworn in the night of the Town Hall Meeting if possible. COUNCILMAN BYRD Councilman Byrd stated our legislative representatives should be notified of our concern for the completion of the widening of highway 50 and other persons that could persuade DOT. COUNCILMAN THOMAS Councilman Thomas commended the swim program and their efforts. ORDINANCE NO. 126-M - VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION Mayor Smoak related the request that Richard Swann submitted for annexing property located just south of the Lakeview Hills Subdivision. Since the owners have now filed appli- cations to rezone the abutting properties to single family, they now wish to proceed with the annexation. After dis- cussion, it was clarified that annexing this property would have no effect on whether the county or city will rezone it. 80-91 THE ORDINANCE WAS READ BY TITLE ONLY AND INTRODUCED BY MAYOR SMOAK FOR FIRST READING. COMPUTER PURCHASE Mayor Smoak spoke, relating the need for the computer and conveying the investigation of the Finance Director in making a decision on the NCR 8150.. After some discussion, 80-92 A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN COLE, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN THOMAS AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT THE CITY ACCEPT NCR'S PROPOSAL FOR AN NCR 8150 MINI -COMPUTER. The meeting was adjourned at 11:10 p.m. -4 CITY OR CI RRAIONT MINUTES REGULAR MER'I'ING Juno 1.0, 1900 L ��,�Ilry ANDRA 0. ROZCLPRK Monia to: ClurmonL CLLy Counul.l. From: GUY Manager SubJucL: Voluntary Annexation Date: May 22, 19130 We have received a .letter from Lakeview Ltd. (attached) requcnti.ng that the City Annex property located Just south of the LakovLew II1.11s Subdivinion. As you cony recall, at the February .11, 1980 City Council Meeting, thin request was tabled until the owner." clarified their. Intent to rezone much of their abutting proportion in Chin area from R-3-A Multiple Family to a Single Family use. Since the owners have now filed applications to rezone the abutting properties to single family, they now wish to proceed with the annexation. Attached are previous memos and a map of this property. Respectfully, ....... George D. Forbes _...... _._. _..:.. City Manager CDF:pm Enclosures MISC. ORDINANCES N° 373 ORDINANCE N0. 12614 AN ORDINANCE UNDER THE CODE AR ORDINANCES OF THE CITY 01' CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND CONTIGUOUS TO THE PRESENT CITY BOUNDARIES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. WIIE[t,AS, tl:e City Council of the City of Clermont, Florida, has received n Petition for Annexation of a parcel of land contiguous to tlw present corporate limits under Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and WHEREAS, the City Council of tl:e City of Clermont, Florida, line determined that it is in the best interest of the City and of the property herein sought to be annexed that the City annex the following described property, and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the area sought to be annexed is contiguous to the City and is in need of the services which the City can offer and the City has determined that such areas sought to be annexed will be substantially benefited by annexation, and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that all requirements of Sections 171.044 and 171.042, Florida Statutes, have been met. SECTION I. Under the provisions of Florida Statute Chapter 171 and the General and Special Laws of the State of Florida; that the City of Clermont, Florida, does hereby annex to and make part of its corporate boundaries, the following described property contiguous to the present City boundary, to -wit: Tracts 8 and 9, and that part of Tracts 7 and 10 lying West of Highway No. 27, according to Lake Highlands Plat of Section 32, Township 22 South, Range 26 East, all in Lake County, Florida. SECTION 2: That the aforedescribed property shall be and hereby is made part and parcel of the City of Clermont, Florida, and that said property and all residents of said property shall be subject to all of the laws, ordinances and provisions pertaining to the City of Clermont, Florida. SECTION 3: All property aforedescribed shall henceforth be subject to ad valorem taxation by the City of Clermont, and any other general or special taxes or assessments. MISC. ORDINANCES N9 374 ORDINANCE NO. 126M SECTION 4: Should any section or part of a section be declared invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such adjudications shall not apply or affect any other provision of this ordinance, except to the extent that the entire section or part of the section may be inseparable in meaning and effect from the section to which such holding shall apply. SECTION 5: This ordinance shall be published as provided by law, and it shall become law and take effect upon its second reading and final passage. First Reading on this day of , A. D., 1980. Second Reading on this day of , A. D., 1980. PASSED AND ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, this day of 1980. CITY OF CLERMONT BY: CLAUDE E. SMOAK, JR., Mayor ATTEST: AICNAMU AOCAWOLL SWANN I UWAMO ELLIS IIAUOOCN, JIL TIIOMAS P. LANE PAUL P. ONYAN OAIAN O. PILL PATAICIA A. OSTIIWILL UAMSS O. WILLAAO Pa AVIS ►AILS SWANN a, G0.- SWANN AN.I) I-IAI)DOWL PAOAASaIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNRYO AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW May 14, 1980 000 COUINLN D a11111ar • SUITS 000 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 112004 TOLOPIIONS 13051 a0aa030 Mr. George D. Forbes Clermont City Manager P. O. Box 219 Clermont, FL 32711 Re: Lakeview, Ltd. zoning change Dear George: Enclosed is a Request for Change of Zoning of certain parcels of land adjacent to the Lakeview Hills subdivision and of which we discussed in your office during our meeting on April 15, 1980 with Allan Keen and the Mayor. A check for $50.00 representing the filing fee and a zoning map relating the parcels to be changed to the existing plat of Lakeview Hills, Phase 1 are also enclosed. Inasmuch as we are proceeding with the voluntary rezoning of the property which the city requested be rezoned, I would like to proceed with the annexation of the approximately 34 acre tract for which a voluntary petition of annexation into the City of Clermont was filed January 21, 1980 on behalf of Richard R. Swann, Trustee, the owner of record. If you desire, written assurances that the rezoning petition will not be withdrawn upon grant of the annexation petition can be obtained from Mr. Swann, the record owner of the property. Please advise if there is anything else you would like before we can move forward with the annexation. Very truly/,,,r;, J S G. WILLARD JGW:gm Enclosure cc: Allan E. Keen Memo tot Clermont City Council Proms George D. Portion - City Manager Subjects Annexation of Richard R. Swann Property Data: February 8. 1980 Enclosed is Ordinance No.126M regarding the annexation of the following property. "Tracto 8 and 9 and that part of Tracts 7 and 10 lying Wont of Highway No. 27. according to Lake Highlands Plat of Section 92, Townohip 22 South, Range 26 East,' all in Lake County. Florida." This property in located junt South of the Lakeview hills subdivision (see attached Map). Richard Swann has petitioned the City for the Voluntary Annex- ation of the above property. Section 171.044 of the Florida Statutes allows for the voluntary annexation of property by Ordinance as long as such Ordinance has been published for once a week for four consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation within the City. Respectfully, Ji /:� George D. Forbes - City Manager 'SWANN, SWANN AND HAD., CK, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUN5ELLOR6 AT LAW 600 COURTLAND SYRC[7 ORLANDO, rLOR1OA 3E804 pCRVIC PRICE SWANN 7[LtI4IUN[ 130[168[•39S0 ' RICHARD ROCKWELL. SWANN COWARD CLLIS MADOOCR, JR, TMOMAS r, LAND January 25, 1900 ORIAN D. HILL ,.ATRICIA A. RCTMWILL , JAMES D, WILLARD ' Mr. George D- Forbes Clermont City Manager P. O. Box 219 Clermont, Florida 32711 Res Annexation and Re -zoning of Property owned by Richard R. Swann, Trustee Dear Mr. Forbes: This letter will serve as a reaffirmation of the January 11 1980 Petition for Annexation of the Lake County property described in the attached Schedule "A" into the city limits of Clermont. The original petition was filed pursuant to F.S. 5171.044 by my attorney, James G. Willard, on behalf of the undersigned. As stated in the original petition, I would request the property be rezoned R-3 as soon as possible following the annexation. Ve tr y">� 1- ICNARD S N, as Trustee PROPERTY TO BE ANNEXED INTO THE CITY OF CLERMONT Tracts 8 and 9, and that part of Tracts 7 and 10 lying West of Highway No. 27, according to Lake Highlands Plat of Section 32, Township 22 South, Range 26 East, all in Lake County, Florida. i SCHEDULE "A" i CITY OF CLERMONT P.O. BOX 21D CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711 • PHONE 004/394.4001 LEGAL NOTICE The City of Clermont shall consider the enactment of the following proposed Ordinance at their meeting to be held on Tuesday, July 8, 1980 at approximately 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers located on the corner of DeSoto Street and West Avenue: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 126-M AN ORDINANCE UNDER THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA PROVIDING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND CONTIGUOUS TO THE PRESENT CITY BOUNDARIES AS DESCRIBED HEREIN: Tracts 8 and 9, and that part of Tracts 7 and 10 lying West of Highway No. 27, according to Lake Highlands Plat of Section 32, Township 22 South, Range 26 East, all in Lake County, Florida. This Ordinance is available for public inspection in the Office of the City Clerk, #1 Westgate Plaza, Clermont, Florida, Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Sandra 0. Rozar, City Clerk City of Clermont, Florida June 5, 1980 June 12, 1980 June 19, 1980 June 26, 1980 •tl ��"1 .•r':.rrr•t'rtt�=�••L•t�rS••tr' }{-i-l."�.� � 1 ��-..-. I, � t I.t.:OG.'I�:tir:~+•-'-7�'� •ti. rpl �'{,n �V ,�'••�'+- �;�.✓ �,.�«w..�r.�. ��... Ir 'a: .i.�a. ,' �•�:F=,;:•' .r-1.; ;� :u �,; is-,�� .j �\. Lz Cn dp it 'li�•:J i, ^"I••-!,L'. 'AIM!=4 'j st. �,i.t,;••-yrti,,, + � •._�• �� � . •i � I I � � l I r• � I Il t ,. R �- ' 11 ^CAI E: I"n 900' f R .N'T •CIT�*tt 0 • t 1 I 1 6y � .� ,�. I ItEQUliS'I' POR �. C.UU.P.�API'IIOVAI, OWNER: Ilerburt L. Hogers APPLICANT: Lld<c Itl.ghl.andn NurnlnR Nonw PROPER'fy: 151.-161 hart Mlnnehaha LOCATION: South of Bast lli.n,eh aha - Between Drew and East Avenue ZONING: 95% :Ln H-3 Zone plus a 90 x 1.47 Lot [11 a R-1.-A Zone REQU]'ST: Conditional Use Perlilit for Lhc conaL'ruatioll Of 11 new 60 Bed and 24 i'sfficlency Unit, three story addi.tlou at the Lake Ilighlancls Nursing Ilanle. COMMENTS: Section 26-87 (I]) and (C) of the Zoning Ordinance sets forth the standards by which Conditional Use PormiLs Lire to be Judged, The City may groat a Conditional Use Permit provided: 1. The proposed Use is desirable at the particular location. 2. Such Us will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing in the vicinity. 3. The proposed Use will comply with the regulations and " codes for such use. -1 1 Use willnot-adversely --- ---- 4. Tile granting of the Condit ona affect the officially adopted Comprehensive Plan of the City. The Nursing Home has revised their site plans as requested by the Planning and Zoning Commission at the May 6, 1980 meeting. I believe that they have made every effort to insure that the proposed addition meets the above conditions, and I would recommend that this request be approved on Lila following conditions: 1. PARKING: The grass parking to the South of this develop- ment will be paved within 180 days if determined by the City Council at a later date, that the intensive use of these parking areas require paved parking. Any work on property Zoned R-1-A must conform to the City's Zoning Ordinances. See attached memo from the Building Inspector regarding park- ing requirements. 2. A SIDEWALK must be constructed to City standards by the owner around the entire Nursing home as shown on the attached plans. 3. All applicable Regulations and Ordinances be met. 4. The use not be expanded except with a Conditional Use Permit. 5. All conditions be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Page 2 C.U.P. APPROVAL, - Hurbort I,. Rogcra Lulce IlLghInnds Nurning Rome May 15, 1.900 G. Since the proposed building Ln very clone to or attached to the existing buildings, the existing fneL.I.Ltics must conform to the standards of the Fire + life Safety Portions of the Southern Standard Build- ing Code. PRr4V'LOUS ACTION, At the May 20th, 1.980 Special Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Comminsi0n, the P & Z voted unanimously to recommend approval of this rcquest. This recomendation is based on the above nix conditions and that: 1. The present building be facelifted as shown on the Archi- tects Conceptual Plans. 2. The visual appearance of the Shed to the South of the property he upgraded in appearance. Respectfully, b-111, George D. Forbes City Manager GDF:pm CITY OF CLERMONT P.O. BOX 210 • CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711 • PHONE 904/394.4001 Memo to: City Manager From: Harvey Nagel Subject: Highland Nursing Home 151 E. Minnehaha Parking Requirements Date: May 23, 1980 Proposed location is in a R-3 Zone Section 26-24-C1-G-4 - Off Street Parking Spells out Clinics and Nursing Homes shall have one (1) park- ing space for each four (4) beds plus one (1) space for each staff or visiting Doctor, plus one (1) space for each four -(4)- .----= employees, including Nurses. Parking Requirements Existing Nursing Beds 82 Proposed Nursing Beds 60 Proposed Efficiency Rooms 24 TOTAL 1 66 ;4 REQUIRED 41 Spaces for Beds REQUIRED 15 Spaces for employees TOTAL REQUIRED 56 Spaces 71 Parking Spaces Available Al_Spaces Available for Beds 30 Spaces available for Doctors, Nurses and employees. Respectfully, Harvey Nagel. Building Official HN: pm s i LEOL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all concerned that the Clermont Planning t Zoning Coininission shall hold cora Public Hearing in the Council Chambers locatedonF`101900nat 7er f30�Pthinv�'�rue and Desoto Streets on Tuesday, May Ma 13, 1gAll and a final hearing by the City Council on Tuesday, Y at 7:3.9 P.M. for the following purpose: for To consider a request of Lake Nighlands Nursing iidlescrihed as: a Conditional Use Permit to utilize the property Lots 11 - Clermont Neights Lots ue ontheWest andDrew Avenunon ebdAnthe East and Minnehaha on the North) for the construction and operation of an R2 Bed Nursing Addition facility in an R-3 Zoning District. . All interested persons will be given an opportunity to express their views on the matter. Sandra D. Rozar, City Clerk City of Clermont, Florida April 24, 1980 A copy of the plans are available for your review in the office of the City Manager Adak Lei 00 CITY OF CILERMONT P.O. BOX 210 • CLEnMONT, FLOMDA 32711 • PHONE 004/304.4001 LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all concerned that the Clermont City Council shall hold a Public Hearing in the Council Chambers located on the corner of West Avenue and DeSoto Streets on Tuesday, May 27, 1980 at 7:30 p.m. for the following purpose: To consider a request of Lake Highlands Nursing Nome for a Con- ditional Use Permit to utilize the property described as: Lots 11 - Clermont Heights Lots (See Legal bounded by East Avenue on the West and Drew Avenue on the East and Minnehaha on the North) for the construction and operation of an 82 Bed Nursing Addition facility in an R-3 Zoning District. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to express their views on the matter. Little Sentinel, May 23, 1980 a Sandra 0. Rozar, City Clerk City of Clermont, Florida 10joa 90 EXISTING SHED ol P ROPOSED .--,. - � - . LAUNDRY BUILDINO a I w OC Im 47 V ,R9' WARK*l iF \� SCREENED P ` aH 0 0 �PROPOSED PROPOSED \ \ \DINING' A KITCHEN \ > s ACTIVITIES x\ M C \ 1-8T DRY. \\\ w \ 'EXI8TIN0, h aj` w CORRIDOR 0 CL 1 cc I� s LANDSCAPE COURT �If11�'h N — - --- - -- - - PROPOSED 3 STORY ADDITION G I 0 I W 1.3 8'- 0" ¢ _ 0 I 0 A 8` 1l'L v < -- - — - -- --- — -- - --- J O YO'A T E. �b H EXISTIIN N w ASPH_ALT,I w 364.66' DRIVE 1 ------------- o m I ti r H' A A V- E N U E .-SITE PLAN 11,ALRs 20,-0. NURSING HOME w Z w a' NO 71 CARS ,QUEST FOR Vnr1.nnee Date: May 15, 1980 OWNER: .ferry Mailan APPLICANT: Same PROPERTY: Lot 12 - Block C Edgewood Subdivision LOCATION: 220 Disaton Street ZONING: R-1-A Single Family REQUEST: Construction of Screened Room that will penetrate 5'6" into the required 25' rear yard setback. COMMENTS: There has been many other variances granted with similar hardships in this Subdivision Respectfully, George D. Forbes City Manager GDF:pm Enclosures PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE TO THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJ iNT '3 -OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLva1DA 1 ' APPLICANT o NAME: MnIlan ADDRESS: 220 Dieoton et. Clermont Gentlemen: G � of,q� foj Having 'postethe necessary $25.00 appeal fee with the City Clerk, I hereby make application to your Board for relief from a decision of the Building Official of the City of Clermont, whereby I was refused permission to: Repair ( ). Add to (2 ), Alter ( ), Construct ( ), Move and Place ( ), a (sign) building on lots 12 , Block 0 Subdivision Osatr►ge-�iaa.l' , Address 220 Diseton St. ,Zone R i Section of Code 2 L- 2l- ^ 3-- in the City of Clermont, Florida. The reason given by the Building Official for the decision in refusing to issue a building permit is: Rear eat -bank insufficient Request variance from 25 ft. to 19 ft. 6 in. My appeal to your Board is based on my contention that this decision creates a hardship on me for the following reason, or reasons: This makes it impossible to build a screen room, that will accomodate standard outdoor furniture. Seven (7) copies of all necessary floor plans, plot plans, and other pertinent infor- mation are attached hereto, on paper size B�" x 14" minimum size. 1 submit that I qualify for this variance because I have an exceptional and unique hardship on my particular parcel of land that is not shared by property owners in my area. A strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives me of the reasonable use of my land and the granting of this variance will not alter the essential character of the area. I have been notified that this Variance Application must be filed with the City Clerk no later than 5:00 P.M. on Friday, two (2) weeks prior to the Council meeting at which time Variance will be considered. I also understand that when any variance is granted, constructiei of the structure must be completed within one year from date of grant. I Date: 8 Lay 1980 Very truly yours, 5/17/77 ;� .. /07, 1 • � ��, ao I l7 ► ss Ta tiJ ST. ei.c►e w,00r; 'N c c. o 5 cr*2E.. 1 Io K HO I E.rilsn►� ►° r <, �,�� Jorry Mailont Varianco Notion to Property Owners Jesse L. Madden Bishop Poirit Clermont"`-4 Orville F. LaSalle 230 Disston Ave. Clermont Ike S. Greene 240 Disston Ave. Clermont Hunter J. Leitch 209 Edgewood Dr. Clermont Harvey N. Kidd 233 Edgewood Dr. Clermont Waldman Kurt 722 Woodland St. Winter Garden, F1. 32787 Wilbur F. Montgomery 221 Disston Ave. Clermont Joan Gibbons 231 Disston Ave. Clermont James H. Cahill 221 Edgewood Dr. Clermont a ..� i IEQUEST FOR _yARTANCL Date: Dlny I L.U13➢,.._. UWNER: Vernon M. Cill APPLICANT: Same PROPERTY: Attached Survey and Legal Description LOCATION: 1728 Nita Place i ZONING: R-1-A Single Family i Rf•.QUEST: Approval to locate house at the seventy foot building, line, whereas 100' is required I COMMENTS: The lot size of this property meets the requirements for the Zoning Ordinance, and a home could be placed farther back on the 'lot to meet the Zoning Setback requirements. However, this would require — the home to be placed closer to the Canal, and it would not conform to the City's flood regulations. The City presently requires all " lakefront homes to have a rear yard of 25' from the high water mark, and have the lowest floor elevated 18" above the 100 year Flood Zone levels. It would not be possible for a home to meet these requirements if it were placed farther back on•the lot, and many other lakefront owners have received variances for these same reasons.' Respectfully, George D. Forbes City Manager GDF:pm PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE TO THE ZONING BOARD OF ,STMENT OF THE CITY OF CLERMONI, .i.ORIDA APPLICANT NAME: Vernon M. Gill Gant, 16 .7 h ADDRESS: 1728 Nita Place S•��•d° Gentlemen: Having ponied the necessary $25.00 appeal fee with the City Clerk, I hereby make application to your Board for relief from a decision of the Building Official of the City of Clermont, whereby I was refused permission to: Repair ( ), Add to ( ), Alter ( ), Construct ( g), Move and Place ( ), a (sign) buildinc on lot/s AYT.,. / Ma , A -el fgywdl . Block VnTs: pfli��ie� Subdivision p•iA, WA�.0 , Address Nl n pl:,�� ,Zone R1A Section of Code 26-20 C-2 in the City of Clermont, Florida. The reason given by the Building Official for the decision in refusing to issue a building permit is: Site plans non -conforming to 100' building line set back in a R I A zone as prescribed in Section 26-20-C-2. hardshiMy p onpmeaforotheufollowingsrea on,based oormreasonsntion that this decision creates a Tocomply with the requirements for a 100' Lot width at the front building line, the building, would have to be set back to within just a few feet of the high water mark. A building cannot be set back far enough on this lot to comply with this restriction. Seven (7) copies of all necessary floor plans, plot plans, and other pertinent infor- mation are attached hereto, on paper size %11 x 14" minimum size. I submit that I qualify for this variance because I have an exceptional and unique hardship on my particular parcel of land that is not shared by property owners in my area. A strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives me of the reasonable use of my land and the granting of this variance will not alter the essential character of the area. I have been notified that this Variance Application must be filed with the City Clerk no later than Variance will be0considered. I alsotwo understandweeks that when any variancer to the Council mistgrantedat which constructio of the structure must be completed within one year from date of grant. Date: — d Very truly yours, 5/17/77 Vernon N. Gills Variance Notice to property owners William W. Boyd P.O. Boy, 393 Clermont.,..; Frances M. Campbell 324 Lamplighter Lana Marietta, Ga. 30062 Wilbur B. Lnagston Rt. 2 Box 700 Clermont, F1. Itelena F. Nowell 592 Lakeshore Dr. Clermont Lloyd Whitlock P.O. Box 402 Clermont Alice Tilden P.O. Box 527 Clermont Donald H. Campbell 324 Lamplighter Lane Marietta, Ga. 30062 Allen Kirk 2812 N. W. 55th Ave. Apt. 20 Lauderhill, F1. 33313 Mrs. L. W. Watson 465 Lakeshore Drive Clermont n LAKe Sllop L...�iz�vc -- `n`�69,O, � \ ME..�!.: �•-:J l.•LT L°;1 .—fit.: p_, 9.F 2i 5% 1S/&O 1'4" Description: That certain parcel of land that is shown, Net j Included on the plat of Point Place as recorded in Plat Book i 14, Page 2B, Public Recorda of Lake County, Florida. Le_s- and Except: Begin at the intersection of the Southerly Lirne Street with the We>--rly flight-oF- Right-oF-Way line of I Vlay line of Nita Piar_e; t'�-nce N.62°00'W. along said Southerly ' Right-oF-Way line of Lime Street, 170.00 Feet; thence 5.S°Oa'w.. - a 1 37 .. - 3. ;r °OO t E . r3 d::>t. mn 'e of 170 Feet `� ',c -_n. .�_„ld _ i ?v,Fi`•^.t-aF-lJ.�y Sine ^F Nita Place' I Uw 'L: U6' E. _ line 137 I Feat to tin. Faint cr Er -Inning. ) t urn s 1 r Ci {C'S . 1 iC. _ f J-SL-?-�c�I2•�^•� I - r� G •IAdIL ORDINANCE NO. _ 206-C AN ORDINANCE UNDER THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA. AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF CLERMUNT, FLORIDA; REZONING THE HHAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN FROM A TRANSITION ZONE CLASSIFICATION; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABLLITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT HEREBY ORDAINS TRAT: SECTION 1. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Clermont, Lake County, Florida, is hureby amended by rezoning the following described property from transition none Classification to M-1 industrial classification, Lots I through 9, and 16 through 22, of Block 119, City of Clermont; Lots 1 through 13, of Block 120, City of Clermont, and that portion of Osceola Street now closed between Blocks 119 and 120, leas the Westerly 122 feet; Lots 1 through 19, of Block 115, City of Clermont; Property bounded on the South by Lakeshore Drive, East by Lake Minneola, s West by Twelfth Street, and North by the easterly extension of the North line of Block 145, City of Clermont; iI That parcel bounded on the West by Block 115. bounded on the North by railroad right-of-way, bounded on the East by West Avenue, bounded on the South by Osceola Street and shores of West Lake; and That parcel bounded on the West by Eleventh Street, bounded on the North by Carroll Street, bounded on the East by the shores of West Lake, bounded on the South by Minneola Avenue. SECTION 2. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Clermont, Lake County, Florida, is hereby -i amended by rezoning the following described property from transition zone classificatiol to C-1 light commercial: Lots 1 and 2, of Block 118, and Lots 10 through 26, of Block 120, and that portion of Osceola Street now closed, lying between lots 14 and 15, City of Clermont. SECTION 3. 4 The Official Zoning Map of the City of Clermont, Lake County, Florida, is hereby amended by rezoning the following described property from transition zone classificatioi to R-3 multiple family. I That property lying North of the railroad right-of-way, West of Eighth Street, and South of the Easterly extension of the North line of Block 145 and the shores of Lake Minneola, except lots 4 through 7, of Block 117, City of Clermont; Lots 1 through 6, of Block 94, except that portion of lots r and 2 that is City owned property; and Lots 9 through 20, of Block 93, City of Clermont. HOVIS AND BAIRD, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, P.C. DRAWER 848, CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711 SECTION 4. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Clermont, Lake County, Florida, is hereby amended by rezoning thu following described property from transition zone classification, to C-2 general commercial: Lots 1 through B. of Block 97, City of Clermont. SECTION 5. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Clermont, Lake County, Florida, is hereby amended by rezoning the following described property from trnnaltion zone three to R-7 multiple family: Block 14, Sunset Heights; land between Block 14 end Lake Minneola, land between Block 14 and Palm Street, Sunset Heighta. i SECTION 6. All Ordinances or parts of this Ordinance in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 7. Should any section or part of this section be declared invalid by any Court of competent jurisdiction, such adjudications shall not apply or affect any other provision of this Ordinance, except to the extent that the entire section or part of the section I may be inseparable in meaning and effect from the section to which ouch holding shall apply. SECTION 8. I This Ordinance shall be published as provided by law and it shall become law and shall take effect immediately upon its Second Reading and Final Passage. First Reading this day of 1980. Second Reading this day of , 1980. PASSED AND ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, !i FLORIDA, THIS DAY OF , 1980. t CITY OF CLERMONT BY: CLAUDE E. SMOAK, JR., Mayor ATTEST: SANDRA 0. ROZAR, City Clerk HOVIS AND BAIRD, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, P.O. DRAWER 848, CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711 APPROVED by me this ,_,__,day of , 1900. CLAUDE Ii. SMOAK, .IN., Mayor CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION I IIERLBY CERTIFY that a certified copy of the foregoing Ordinance No. was published on the day of , 1980, in a newspaper of general circulation located within the City of Clermont, as required by Florida Statutes 166.140 (J)(a), said date of publication being 14 days prior to the Second Reading and Final Adoption of the Ordinance. SANDRA 0. ROZAR, City Clark ORDINANCE NO. 200-C AN ORDINANCE UNDER THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING APPENDIX A, %ONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLNRMONTI REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITYI PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATEI AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT HEREBY ORDAINS THAT: SECTION la Appendix A of the Code of Ordinancou, City of Clermont, is hereby amonded to road as follows: A. Sea attached schedule which is incorporated and made a part horcof. SECTION 2: All ordinances or parts of this Ordinance in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 3: Should any section or part of this section be declared invalid by any Court of competent jurisdiction, such adjudications shall not apply or affect any other provision of this Ordinance, except to the extent that the entire section or part of the section may -.- be inseparable in meaning and effect from the section to which such holding shall apply. SECTION A: This Ordinance shall be published as provided by law and it shall become law and shall take effect 30 days after its Second Reading and Final Passage. First Reading this day of. , 1980. Second Reading this day of , 1980. PASSED AND ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, THIS DAY OF , 1980. CITY OF CLERMONT BY: CLAUDE E. SMOAK, JR., Mayor ATTEST: I APPROVED by me this Jay of 19110, CLAUNd I„ SMOAK, dit., Mayer CEWrIFICATI; OF PUBLICATION I IIERERY CEIITI". that a certified copy of the foregoing ordinaneu No. was published on the day of , 1980, in a newspaper of general circulation located within the City of Clermont, no required by Florida Statutos 166.14 (3)(a), said data of publication bein!; 14 days prior to the Second Rending and Final Adoption of the Ordinance. SANDRA 0. ROlAR, City Clcrk Numo Lo: Clermont City C011ncll. From: City Planngor Subject: Zoning and S1.11n Ordina"COn Date: May 23, 1.980 Attached is n su:mnary of the proposed revisions to the City Zoning Ordinance. Please review the summery, and the Ordinances that were previously d.l.stributed to Council Plembers. I realize theca tiro lengLhy documents and 111.0116e feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Attached are .letters from Bell Ceramics and Blua Goose regarding the Transition Zonc. In response to Public comments and suggestions by City Council mmnbers, I would. suggest that the proposed revisions be adopted with the following amendments to Ordinance 208-C. 1 Section 26-1 - Zoning Districts. The words C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District be replaced with C-1 Light Commercial District. 2 Section 26-38 - Existing Lots - An asterlcic be placed following the word Ordinance and at the bottom of thepagethe words:"*Lot of record.. as of September 10, 1968." This is necessary to explain that existing lots, if platted previously to September 10, 1968, may still be used as a building site provided all the yard requirements of the Zoning Ordinance are met. 3 Section 26-23 - Extension of Parking Space into Residential District. Item (5), Number 4 be added to state, "'file above provisions shall also apply to properties in which a Conditional Use Permit 1s granted." This is necessary to ensure that Conditional Uses allowed in Residential Zones can also utilize parking in any Residential Zone. 4 Article XVII Part D Item 4 - Lot Coverage. The word feel' is changed to percent. This provision explains lot coverage and the proper term should be percent. 5 Article XVIII C-1 Zone Section D Part 5 - Dwelling Units. This item should be placed as a Permitted Use instead of a Conditional Use in a Light Commercial Zone. This is consistent with the intent of the C-1 Zoning, and will avoid unnecessary Conditional Use Permit's since many Single Family homes exist in areas proposed as C-1 in our changes from Transition Zoning. Any home modified or built- would still be required to meet the requirements of the R-3 Residential Zone. 6. C-2 General/Central Business District Part C Conditional Uses. The Conditional Uses could be amended to require Shopping Centers to be considered only as a Conditional Use. This would allow the City to consider the impact on the community of any Shopping Center development, and Shopping Centers. would be defined as: Shopping Centers - Any group of five or more businesses with shared parking/in which the total land area of the development exceeds five acres. i Pape 2 I4cmu to: Clermont CLLy Councl.l, From; CLLy Manager Date: May 29, .1.980 7. M-.I [nduatriol Zone l.'_arL IS Permitted Uses, Item 9. It hna been suggested that rooLrleting Crove-9crviccs and Overnite TruclUng 1:0 M-1, Induatrlal ZoncS IS too rentrictivc, and that better defined Truck Routco may be a better way to handle 'trucking RclpaLed problems. Respectfully, ✓ Ccorge'U. Forbes City Manager CDP:pm Enclosures PROp(lUBO Rulhl(1M; 'ro CITY 7011im; ORDIRANCM, AND ZONING OINTRICI'I; 'fho Planning, and Zoning Commtasion of the Clty of Clermont (p 6 7.) han been review Inl; the City Zoning Ordinance in order to better nerve the commim ity, The Commia- alaD bulleven that the City'd Zoning ordlnanco In hnnlvally Wound but III need of nnme ravlslona to insure that it motto the novda of our community. In rM swing the Zoning Ordlnnnoe, we kept to mind that 'y,anlnf; Regulatlnnn nhunld be pruclsu; and worded In nuch it mnnorr IhM can bc• Letter undvrstuud by our cttiruna, an well as enforced by the (!fly. Zonlo Revinlonn. The fallowing In n aumnun•y of the major ravltiiuos to the Zoning Ordinance. 1. Transition Zonon. In June of 1969, the (;lty cntnblinhed three Trnnultion Zones sit port of the city's Zoning Ordinance. 'rite purpone of these Transition Zones were to allow oxinting UnrH within there zones to remain for it puriud of fifteen yearn, after whlr;h time nil unes were to conform with the ragnire- menta of the R-3 Multiple Family Zone, 'Thin meann that in .little of 19R4, All of the unrn In the 'trannitlon Znnrn must (1an- form to the Uses permitted in the Multlpla t'Anilly Zoua. This does not allow for the lnduntries And Buslneauen presently located within three Zones, many of which have been expanded or improved nince 1961). it Ia the intent of the Planning and Zoning commisslon to remove the Transition Zoned from the Zoning Ordinance, and rezone thane properticH in a manner that would reflect the highest Lind beat Use in our community. Attached is a map of the proposed zoning changes for these areas, 2. Format. The Zoning Districts have been placed inn nchedulyd type format with the regulations pertaining to n Zoning District on one page. Thin will clarify the District Regulations and eliminate file need to search throughout the Ordinance for the District Regulations. 3. Residential Zones. The Residential Zoning Districts are essentially unchanged with two exceptions. the R1AA Zone hall been eliminated. There is no property In the City Ilmlts zoned H1AA, and we do not contemplate any property In the future or presently In need of such zoning. The R1AA Zone provided for minimum lot sizes of 15,000 square feet, and allowed only Single Family Residences. The basic intent of this district was to insure that as the City expanded, the City Zoning was consistent with the Count,v 'Zoning outnlde of the City limits. However, we have reviewed this matter and the Zoning in the County, and no longer betlevr that such A district Iv necessary. We are also recommending that the R3A and R3 Zones be combined into one Zone known as R-3. The R-3 Residential Professional District And RM Townhouse Districts are essentially the same Zones with one exception. The R3 Zone allow, Professional Offices, but only as a Conditional Use, These two zones have been combined into one zone that allows Professional Offices as a Conditional Use. The only other major change in that the lot width nt the building setback line for duplexes was reduced from 100' to 75'. 4. Commercial 'Zones. C-1 - Neighborhood Commercial District. The Neighborhood Cununercial- District is intended for small neighborhood retail businesses that are located adjacent to residential neighborhoods. 'These Uses would be -permitted as long as they did not occupy more than 3,000 square feet of fluor space. The totem of this, Zone is to allow for light retail services that would not be detrimental to abutting residences. This Zone would generally he located Along major roads other than Highway 50 and 27, and should become particularly Important an the Clly grows to the South. C-2 - General Commercial District. The General Commercial District is intended for full scale Retail Sales that service the needs of the entire community. The General Commercial Districts fa and will continue to be properties`` that abut Highways 50 and 27, Retail Business, Professional Offices, Automotive Sales, Hotels, Restaurants, and related Unen are allowed in this zone. `i: 14iµe 2 Proposed Revisiona to City Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Districto 5, industrial Dlntrictn, The City Zoning Ordiontrn pronrntly provide" far two Industrial Districts, one In n light and ilia other it medium Induatrinl We believe that the lnterento of the City could lip bettor nerved by hawing only one Industrial Dfutrlct, Thin district would entnhllnh porformanee ntandardn for the type of industries allowed no n Pormlttrd or Condltionnl Une. Thu proposed Industrial Dintrict pot•mlto light manufacturing, nnnumbliop, or packag- Ing, tin long not such work is conducted within n vompletuly rnrloned building with a total maximum floor space of 7,000 square feet or lens, 00ior Unon or manufac- turing plants greater than 7,000 square feet In aren could be Permitted tin u Con- dltlonal Una, provided that they can meat the Conditional Ban etandnrdn estnblished fit the Ordinance. 6. Other Chanren. Mobile Home Parks. The minimum size of it Mobile home Park of oil( - sere was established. Also, the setbacks for Mobile homes from a public nft•vrt wall revised to be consistent with other Zones. The front yard setback In 50, on Highways 50 and 27, and 25 feat on other public streets, Purkino. The parking requirements• for single family homes have been clarified to insure that adequate parking spaces are provided. 7. Sign Ordinance. The proposed Sign,Ordinance hall very Cow chaugea. 'rho main recommendation of the Commission in to ndopt the proposed Sign Code Ordinance and separate It from the Zoning, Ordfnance. This had several advantages in that it would allow us to place the code In an easily rendable format that makes the Sign Code much easier to understand than breaking the Code up under all of the various Zoning Districts. The other major revisions are that the Off Premise Signs Provisions have been clarified to only allow such signs in vncnnt property. Off-alte signs nlxty- - - four (64) square feet in area or less munt be a minimum of 200' from any other off -site signs on the same side of the street. Off -site signs greater than 64 square feet must be 1,000 from any other off -site sign. The Ground Sign Provisions were nlso modified to allow Ground Signs lower than 9' In height to be located in front of the building setback line. However, these signs cannot exceed 32 square feet in area and must not be cloner to the street than one-half of the required front yard setback. Conclusion. The above revisions have been carefully considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission as in tine beat interests of our community. We welcome public comment on these proposals. The Planning and 'Zoning commission is an advisory body to the City Council. Final consideration of these proposed changes must be adopted by the City Council of the City of Clermont by Ordinance. PIANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION of the City of Clermont Members: Ruth Alice Ray, Chairman Henry Czech, Vice Chairman Mike Conley Laura Cook :Vick Jones Louise Relyea Jack Sargent Bob Thompson Alfred Wilcox GDF: pm _ , AW-1k WV*► O, CITY OF CLERMONT P.O. BOX 219 • CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711 e PHONE 904/304-4001 May 22, 1980 R. Dewey Burneed McLin & Burnsed Attorneys and Couneelora at Law 1000 West Hain Street Leesburg, Florida 32748 Dear Mr. Burnsed: I have discussed with the Mayor and informed City Council members of your request that the Council take no formal action on the Bell Ceramics property at our Public Hearing, May 27, 1980. I have received no objections to this request; however, a representative of Bell Ceramics should be present at the Public Hearing. We plan to place this item on the Council Agenda of June 24, 1980 meeting for final action. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, George D. Forbes City Manager GDF:pm cc: Richard Bell ME McLiN ill I11JBNHI:I) I'Mor NN/IONAL AN11oC1ATION ATTORNMY16 AND CODNNSIVA NN AT LAW I.. WONT MAIN OTNNtT LaD■DUDD, FLONIDA OOTAO WA1XXN S. INWN, LD ►OAT O►►ICt ONAWtt 1061 ■.DOWLT DUNNAAD ANNA COnt ooa tTANLtT t, NAtAD" TALI►114Nt M►•1417 "ND A. NONNISON May 8, 1980 �0 iy Mr. George Forbes, City Manager City Clermont v 1 Westgate ate Plaza L Clermont, Fla. 32711 Rol Bell Ceramics, Rezoning Dear Mr. Porbosl As you are award, I represent�Boll Ceramics in conjunction with this rezoning matter. We are presently scheduled to appear before you on your May 27 meeting. It is.my understanding that you are going to have a meeting on May 13. We.do request on, behalf of Bell ceramics a postponement of one month. Tho reason for thin -request is that we need additional time within which to gather the information necessary for our -presentation to you. In addition to the foregoing, it is my understanding that you are going to have a June;,election to fill the°unexpired term of councilman Meginley and by your second meeting in Juno yoU should have a full Council. We would greatly appreciate it if you would take up this request for postponement at your first meeting in May in order that we will know whether we will be expected to have to make a presentation at your May 27 meeting. Your assistance in this matter will be greatly appre- ciated. Yn'kul R. Dews Burnsed RDB:dac cc: Mr. Lanny Baird cc: Mr. Richard Bell PHONE: 13091 007•4301 _ BL_U_LGOOSE _GROWERS, INC. 000TN CADTERN DIVI3IC F.O. DOx 1120 . VERO DL'ACH. FLORIDA 32000 May 20, 1980 Mr. George D. Forbes City Manager q' City of Clermont ¢ P.O. Box 219 Clermont, FL 32711 ( ,`'y' 'A^I Dear Mr. Forbes: At your request, and after our review of many facts relative to the proposed rezoning of our property, we are strongly opposed to the change to zone classification R-3 Multiple Family Zone. Because of the most important reasons summarized below, we suggest your proposed line of demarcation for R-3 zoning should end on the east perimeter of our property and not include our parcel which is practically surrounded by light industrial use, and has been zoned for such continued use: 1. Our property is being used for clean light industry use and is planned for this continued use for years to come. 2. The Blue Goose operation has had favorable impact on the economic community of Clermont and will continue to do so - accordingly minor - alterations and/or changes to our operation might be needed for improve- ment to best operate for success of the future. 3. For the "best use" zoning plans, we feel it is unappropriate to select our property for inclusion into R-3 when other industry use (lumber company, city maintenance facilities, trust mill) border us on most sides. 4. Blue Goose's current and planned operational practice is to moderately improve the physical plant, appearance - maintenance wise and continue to direct its flow of truck traffic, as it has in the past, away from Lake Shore Drive and to heavy use traffic roads. 5. Finally, should we ultimately change someday in the future, our planned use for the actual real estate, our zoning change request would certainly be in an upgraded manner. I respectfully request these comments be given careful consideration at your May 27th meeting, and my Clermont area manager, Jim Adamson, will be present at this meeting to present these comments for the record, and answer any questions the planning board or city commissioners might have relative to this issue. Sincerely, q tS' . J. Brantley Schir d D' Florida Division anager JBS/do cc: Claude E. Smoak, Jr. Lester Cole Carlisle A. Byrd, Jr. Dennis Thomas Robert Essick, President, Blue Goose Growers, Inc. LROAI, N(fI'Ila+, AMENDM,VNTS TO ZONING ORDINANCE The City Council of the City of Clermont will be conducting a Public Hearing on Proposed Admendmentn to the City Zoning Ordinance on Tuesday, May 27, 1980 at 7:70 p.m. in the City Council Chombern, 082 DoSoto Street, Clermont, Floridn (Public Safety Building). 'l'he purpono of thu Proponed Clungun are to conuldur: 1. Ordinance No. 200-C amending Appendix A, Zoning Ordinance of tlw City of Clermont. 2. Ordinance No. 206-C amending the official Zoning Map of Clermont, Florida rezoning real property from Transition Zone classification to Induntrinl, Multiple Family, Light,nnd Con- cral Couanercial Diatriet clansifications PUBLISH IN THE' SOUTH LAKE PRESS April 24, 1980 and May 15, 1990. . �' "'I" i ORDINANCE NO. 200-C AN ORDINANCE UNDER THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING APPENDIX A, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT► REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWIT111 PROVIDING FOR SEVERAAILITY1 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE► AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT HEREBY ORDAINS THAT: SECTION is Appendix A of the Code of Ordinancos, City of Clermont, is hereby amended to road as follows: A. See attached schodulo which is incorporated and made a part hereof. SECTION 2: All Ordinances or parts of thin Ordinance in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 3: Should any section or part of this section be declared invalid by any Court of competent jurisdiction, such adjudications shall not apply or affect any other provision of this Ordinance, except to the extent that the entire section or part of the section may be inseparable in meaning and effect from the section to which such holding shall apply. SECTION 4: This Ordinance shall be published as provided by law and it shall become law and shall take effect 30 days after its Second Reading and Final Passage. First Reading this day of , 1980. Second Reading this day of . 1980. PASSED AND ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, THIS DAY OF , 1980. ATTEST: SANDRA U. R0ZAR, City Clerk CITY OF CLERMONT BY: CLAUDE E. SMOAK, JR., Mayor 1 of , 1.980. � APPROVED by me this day CI.AUUR L. SMOAK, -1R., Mayor CPN'fIT'ICATP OF PUILICAI" 10EREISY CERTIFY that a certified copy of the foregoing Ordinancu 110, was published on the „__ day of 1980, in a newspaper of general circulation located within the City of Clermont, as required by Florida Statutes 166.14 (3)(a), said date of publication being 14 days prior to the Second Rending and Final Adoption of the Ordinance. SANDRA 0. ROZAR, City Clerk REQUEST FOR SU13D'LVIST.ON `,,.. CH Dote:— May 27, 1980 OWNER: Bob Henter APPLICMIT: Same I'ItOPlaf1Y; Margaree Gardens Subdivision LOCATION: South of Settle Street and Lake Shore Drive on property commonly known as (look Point ZONING: 11-1—A Single Family REQUEST: Variance from Chapter 19 of the City Subdivision Ordinance In order to construct roadside swales on these streets, whereas curb and gutter streets are required. COMMENTS: We believe that the City Ordinances are proper in requiring curb and gutter streets. The City'ahas already experienced problems in Subdivisions constructed without curb and gutter, and roadside swales introduce many maintenance problemsas - discussed in the attached City Engineer's letter. Respectfully, George D. Forbes - City Manager GDF:pm ,_ CITY OF CLERMONT P.O. OOX 219 CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711 • PHONE 904/394.4081 May 14, 1980 MEMO TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: PROPOSED MARGAREE GARDENS SUBDIVISION E-113 I have studied the question of curbs and gutters vs roadside swales for the subject development and offer the following comments: 1. In studying the Code of Ordinances of the City of Clermont, it is obvious that the intent of the Code is to have curbs and gutters constructed on all City streets. For Example: Chapter 19 - Article II Sec. 19-16 Grading; Curb - - In 1st paragraph, In all areas, the ground surface shall slope uniformly from the property line to the top of the curb and shall drain to the curb." 2nd paragraph, "Street curbs shall be curb and gutter." Chapter 19 - Article III, Sec. 19-23, 1st Para. The purpose of these specifications is to establish a set of standards for the construction of street curbs for all street pavements to be constructed within the City Limlts of the City of Clermont, or in adjacent subdivisions which may be annexed to the City." Chapter 20 - Sec. 20-12I(3) 'Concrete curbs and gutters shall be constructed on all streets." 2. Roadside swales introduce several maintenance problems: a. Until the whole development is completed there is a pro- blem of maintenance of swale bottom slopes due to construc- tion on individual lots. b. Inverts of driveway culverts must be set to conform to drainage design of swales. May 14, 1980 MEMO (cont.) Page 2 c. Driveway culverts plugged with sand from eroded shoulders, impede drainage flaws when design flows are necessary. d. Impossible to control homeowners attempts to regrade or fill in swale in front of his house. 3. The overall appearance of a street with swales is affected more by different degrees of homeowner maintenance than on a curbed street. 4: The City has experienced costly re -habilitation problems in sub- divisions constructed without curb and gutter. In my opinion the City should adhere to the Code of Ordinances in this matter.' ao n ringstead, P.E., President pri gstead and Associates, Inc. JWS:mm �nro;a ABC r-RUIT COMPANY p gMhl.l'.'r rf Ml.I/It I%TI1'JO Akin WOVI! CA17E1 4oij4 GOUTI-i ORANGE[ AVENUI_ ORLANDO. FLORIDA .12000 1-1. O N C 1 :1 0 H • O U 9 • U 4 7 8 May 21, 1980 Mr, George D. Forbes City Manager City of Clermont P.O. Box 219 Clermont, Florida 32711 Dear Mr. Forbes: In response to your letter of May 16, regarding the Margaree Subdivision, I would like to review the following points. First, Lots 1, 10, 11, 18 and 19, Block B more than meet the minimm' ec�00ngellohave no t�a th the setbakrequiremenas long asyou allow the builder o designate one side to be front and one side to be rear set backs leaving the two sides as yard set backs. As far as the U.S.G.S. Monitoring Stations, their agreement is to remove the wells upon owner's request with 30 days notice. Without knowing the exact location in relation to the plat layout, I have made no determination on what my course will be at this time. I foresee no problen in meeting the 97.5' high water mark line for rear building lot setbacks. Finally, I would like to apply for a variance to your Code Ordinance wa I believe that sil drainage will be more desirable than curb and gutter for the following reasons: 1. The parcel is well drained with excellent percolating soil. 2. The maxima elevation variation being a low of 97.5' Itd, high of 114.0' 3. This property is relatively flat and will not cause accelerated runoff and erosion that could occur with parcels of extreme elevation variations. 4• This type of drainage allows waterpavement to move freely off of the important, during stores which aids to of traffic, but moat �rtrac leplaOWersces cleaner the velocity of runoff in grass line ctwnnels, waterpinto aesmaller r tentionarea daasmuch lower volume of our moat valuable Lake County asset - clean waatteerr� the protection of i I I have researched this request very carefully, ping in keee interest of all the residents of this chain of awould appreciate best any consideration regarding this matter, laks and �Sine , Robert d,Lester, President