The URL can be used to link to this page

02-26-1980 Supporting DocumentsCITY 0/ CLPRUONT MINUTES REGULAR MEETING A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clermont was hold in the Council Chambers on Tuesday, February 26, 1980. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Claude Smoak, Jr., with the following Councilmen present: Councilman Lester Cole, Dennis Thomas, and Carlisle Byrd. Other Officials present were City Manager Forbes, City Attorney Baird, Finance Director Saunders and City Clerk, Sandra Rozar. The Invocation was offered by Councilman Byrd, followed by repeating the Pledge of Allegiance in unison by those present. Mayor Smoak introduced and welcomed the new City Clerk, Sandra Rozar. Mayor Smoak requested the Minutes of the Regular Meeting held on Febru- ary 12, 1980 be amended to change the wording of Impact Fees to read Imrovement Fees. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting held February 12, 980 were approved as amended. VARIANCE REQUEST: FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH The City Council, acting as a Board of Adjustment, considered a request submitted by Dan Judy representing the Building Com- mittee for the First Baptist Church asking to construct a Util- ity Building in the rear yard of the church that exceeds the square footage allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. The Council discussed the fact that the ordinance applies more to residen- tial buildings, the irregular shaped lot and topography of this property. It was recommended that the Ordinance be re- viewed to determine its effect -on commercial properties and the needs of the community. Councilman Byrd made the motion to 80-31 grant the variance to the churc wi Counci man omas secon - ing. a mo ion was unanimously adopted. RECREATION COMMITTEE REPORT Mayor Smoak elaborated on the function of the Recreation Com- ittee and named the members of the committee. Members being Dennis Thomas, Chairman serving until this time, other members, Mary Shaw, Gerald Shepard, Ray McMahon, Adolphus Church, and Beth Allsion. Dennis Thomas is now serving as a Councilman. Mary Shaw spoke representing the Recreation Committee, giving their recommendations and considerations as follows: (1) City funding of Summer Youth Programs, hiring a summer Recreational Supervisor working approximately 20 hours per week. The esti- mated cost being $1,200. (2) Construction of a Public Park in the Orange Hillarea. Construction would include a fence and swing sets. Mr. Bob Wear has agreed to work with interested local citizens and construct the balance beam, tire maze, tether ball and agility run projects. (3) Frank Stearns, a Clermont High School student, as part of an Eagle Scout and Key Club project has agreed to construct soccer posts at the Middle School if approved by the school. They will also construct picnic tables and cookout facilities at the Sunnyside Drive Park. No cost estimate was made. (4) The committee recommends a fee of $5.00 per person for Little League and Babe Ruth programs, Jr. and Sr. Girls Softball Leagues, and a $10.00 fee per person for adult softball programs be implemented this year. The intents of this CIrY OF OLC.RNONT MINUTES feo in t(i )io pinced in a fund for Recreation Programs. Rnch team would be requi.rod to submit it list of eligible players wi.Lh the above fccn for NON-1111,STDMNTS ONLY. (5) 'rho committer analy%od tho Collowinrl options for. improving Jaycee Beach: (1) Fencing .Jaycee Bunch from the Boat Ramp to the Bell. corarnicn property. (2) Allowing the concessionaire or hirinn employees to charge four, for the beach. (.3) Re-routing Lake Minrieola Drive and charging fees as persons park their cars. ('Thin option is not presently feasible, since the state owns tht right of way.) (4) having a service organization charge fees for the beach ('Phis option was not considered feasible since i required too much of a long term committillent). After considering all the above options, the Recreation Co:mnittee recommended (1) A four foot fence be constructed from the present four foot fence west to the Boat Ramp and east to the liell Ceramics property. This fence would have three public access gates for charging fees. Estimated cost would be $5,000. (2) A fee be charged for non-residents on weekends and holidays from Ma;morial Day to Labor Day as follows: (a) $.50 for Adult use of the beach, (b) $.25 for children's use of the beach (c) $1.50 for use of the Boat Ramp and Driver.. The Boat. Ramp could be charged every day through- out the summer. Residents would be able to get a card at Ci.ty hall and obtain admission to all the listed facilities at no charge. Season ticketa could also be purchased at City Hall for non-residents at the following prices: Boat Ramp - $25.00 per season, Beach - $5.00 per person or $15.00 per family membership. The concessionaire is interested in col- lecting and taking a percentage of the fees. The committee recommended also that possible sources of grant funding be investigated. This would be expended to include new restrooms and remodeling the concession stand. It was also recommended the City Attorney investigate the possibilities of gaining public access of West Beach. The committee recommend they be allowed to seek potential sites and funding for an outdoor recreational complex (approximately 20 to 30 acres) that would include softball diamonds as well as open space for soccer and other activities. The total funding recommend- ations for all mentioned was $10,000. Public comments were made; each program taken separately with ostensive consideration. The following persons taking part: Mr. Bob Wear, Anne Pitt, Gerald Shepard, Mr. Searles, Mrs. Jane Winchenbach, Frank Stearn:, Lloyd Bolick, George ilovis, Nora Kirkland, Beth Allison, Fran- ces Gifford, Debbie Kennard, Mr. Czech, Mary Bullock, Mr. Reynolds, and Colcue Judy. The general comments were in favor of the fees for non-residents, however, there were objections to the implementation being in force this year. Motion was m•ide by councilman Byrd and seconded by Councilman 80-32 Cole that all school functions be exempt from the fees. The motion carried unanimously. Colene Judy questioned if Business owners were exempt. It was clarified that all Clermont resi- dents and property owners will be exempt. Moved by Councilman Byrd seconded by Councilman Cole that fees due for Softball - 60-33 Paschall participants be due by July 1, 1980. Councilman Byrd questioned whether each individual would be responsible for payment or each League. It was clarified that each League would be responsible for submitting their roster and payment to the City. The motion was carried unanimously. -2- ;y , CITY OP CLPNIONT MINUTES Mr.. Wear asked quost•ions on the Recreation Committee's functions and funding sources. Mayor. Smoak encouraged Mr.. Wear to accopt• an appointment to the committee since he believed Mr. Wear would be a great asset. Mr.. Reynolds asked if there was a way of deterrring parking and loitering west of the beach area. Discussion revealed the area is under the Department of Transportation juris- diction. The City Attorney was requested to investigate the possibilities Chief Tyndal may take in resolving the problem. It was questioned by Mayor Smoak if there was an objection to guest cards, possibly at a nominal charge for resident guests desiring to make use of the recreational facilities. The recreation committee was directed to further research this matter. 80-36 Councilman Thomas made a motion to accept the Recreation Committee s Report as amen e , eav ng the distribution of the funds wit• in each program to the discretion or the i y anager. The me ion was secon e y Counci man Byr an Carrie unanimous y. Mayor Smoak introduced he has appointed to the Recreation Committee, Barrie Rakow and Ed Pauley. WATER METER RECONCILIATION: DAN JUDY Mr. Dan Judy appeared before the council regarding a water meter and assessment he was required to pay in order to construct a mini -warehouse located at 631 DeSoto Street. Mr. Judy felt it unfair to have to pay for a new meter and assessment, with Mr. Vandermeer being refunded the payment of a meter that was to have been installed in 1972. Mr. Baird, City Attorney, attested it was completely legal for the City to have refunded the original meter cost to Mr. Vandermeer and assess Mr. Judy at the current rate for installation. After some discussion, Councilman Thomas made a motion the $550.00 paid by Mr. Judy be refunded 80-37 The motion ie or lack of a second. councilman Byr made a mo ion to insta a inch meter an re un or t e meter now insta e , secon e y Council- man Cole. T e motion was amended to re un Mr. Judy t e cost he paid or t e water meter. T e motion was carried wifH councilman Triomai3 voting negative. Authority was given to Attorney Bair an City Manager Forbes to collect the $225.00 refunded Mr. Vandermeer. SHUTTLE BUS SERVICE: MR. ANTHONY SIDES Mr. Sides appeared before the Council requesting the City provide a statement to the Public Service Commission stat- ing the Council agrees the area does need a Shuttle Bus System. 80-38 The motion was made by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Councilman Thomas and unanimously carried t at City Manager Forbes be authorized to sign a letter on the need for Bus service. -3- CITY OF CUNIONT MINUTES WATER SYSTEM CLOSING City Manager Forbos reported the closing of a $1.6 million water system improvement loan from the Farmers' Home Administration has boon postponed until. March 10. The closing was originally scheduled for Wednesday, February 27, 1980 at Clermont City Hall, but was delayed by the FMHA due to scheduling conflicts. FLOATS, SWIMMING AREA City Manager. Forbes reported there are three floats remain- ing in the water, out of nine originally placed as swim- ming safety markers. tic suggested posts of PVC pipe with signs denoting the swim area would last longer. There were no objections from the Council in allowing the City to construct such a system. RESOLUTION i1346 This resolution was read by Title only. A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA ELECTING TO PARTICIPATE WITH THE EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL IN A COMBINED ENTITLEMENT JURIS- DICTION PROGRAM TO APPLY FOR A GRANT REGARDING LEAA/CRIMINAL JUSTICE ENTITLEMENT FUNDS TO IMPROVE THE CITY 'S LAW ENFORCE- MENT CAPABILITIES. City Manager Forbes explained the intent of this resolution is to combine with other cities in the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council to qualify the city for possible Law Enforcement Funding. 80-34 A motion by Councilman Thomas, seconded bg Ceunci*lman'Byrd was ma a to a opt this reso ution. T e no ion was carried unanimously. COMMUNICATION A letter of resignation was received from Raymond McMahon of the Recreation Committee. Mayor Smoak commended him for his efforts on this committee and stated he plans to remain active in community affairs. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING GRANT City Manager Forbes reported on the City's application for a Local Government Plannirrl Grant. The project would be a comprehensive sewer system study equivalent to the water study recently completed. The city has been awarded a total grant amount of $6,228. One half of the total grant amount must be matched by the City, however, the City will not need the entire grant amount for this project. Forbes recommended the agreement with the City Engineer be accepted. The estimated cost of the Engineering Study is $5,800. The City must provide for the installation of a recording 'flow - meter and provide a City worker for infiltration examination 80-35 for a total cost of $8,700. Councilman Thomas made the motion with Councilman Cole seconding to approve the Local Government Planning Act Assistance Fund Agreement between State o F on a -4- CITY OP CURd10NT MINUTES De artmont of: COmmLIniL" Affairs and C.i.L• �C�o�_�un�c�il of Clermont Flor da, and the agreemcnL• w.th Lho C tY Lsnc— 11.noer for. Lho ewer study.. T� e motion wao cared unanimous.Ly. FLOOD CONTROL ORDINANCC11 203 City Manager Forbes explained the purpose of the Flood Control Ordinance. The Ordinance requires the City to review all building permits and subdivision proposals to insure that they are safe from flooding. The Ordinance is required to comply with the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program. For the Clermont Chain of Lakes, 99' above sea level, is considered the one hundred year flood elevation. New buildings must then have the lowest floor elevated 18" above this level. These regulations would give the City more guidance and control over development in flood hazard areas. Councilman Thomas introduced Ordinance 11203 for First Reading. The Ordinance was read. Mr. Seargeant requested something be done regarding the group of people loitering and panhandling about town. Chief Tyndal was requested to Took into the matter to determine what can be done. There being no further business to be brought before the Council, the meeting was adjourned by Mayor Smoak at 10:30 P.M. CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES SPECIAL MNETINO WASTE DISPOSAL ALT;,'RMATIVFS A Special. Meeting of the City Council of the City of Clermont was called to order by Mayor Claude Smoak at 5:10 P.M. on Wednesday, February 20, 1980 in the Council Chambers. The following Council- men were present: Councilman Carlisle Byrd, Dennis Thomas, and Jim Meginley. Other City officials present were: City Manager Forbes, City Attorney Baird, and Deputy City Clerk Meyer. Mayor Smoak stated that the purpose Of the meeting was to clarify the official position of the City of Clermont regarding the disposal of the City's treated effluent, and to give those present an opportunity to express their opinions or ask questions regarding the various concepts proposed. CITY STAFF PRESENTATIONS The City Engineers, John Springstead and Bud Sampso:lof the Firm of Springstead and Associates were present. They explained that the Compliance Schedule requires the City to study three methods of disposing the City's treated effluent. These methods are advanced waste treatment, landspreading, and the wetlands. The advantages and disadvantages of each approach were discussed. The City Utility _ Director, Preston Davis was present and explained the operation of the treatment plant. Samples of the City's treated effluent and water from Lake Minneola were compared. There was much dis- cussion regarding the landspreading and wetland alternatives; feasibility of these methods during high and low water, and the number of acres required for disposal. PUBLIC COMMENT Mayor Smoak responded to questions on the City perculation ponds and present disposal methods which have not effected the water quality of the Palatlakaha River for eight years. lie further stated the problem we are facing and the solution we are trying to arrive at is how best to dispose of a community problem, not just a city problem. The City is also asking for a temporary five year ex- perimental permit so we can monitor what is happening in the marsh. Questions wereasked whether the City would be in a position to turn off the valve the day it is established that the marshland al- ternative does not work, even though it may cost the City monetarily? The Mayor replied that the permitting process itself would require that this be done. Public comments were received and several per- sons commended the City Council in the way they were handling this matter. Several citizens also voiced objections to the marshland alternative. The major objections presented were the impoundment of the marsh, and the belief that other treatment methods would be safer in keeping our lakes clean. SOUTH MARSH ALTERNATIVE The City Engineer presented the South Marsh Alternative or Concept No. 6, which is a marsh that lies west of 561 and south of highway 50. This marsh contains 141 acres with the only outlet into the Palatlakaha River through culverts to the north of the marsh. It was explained that this proposal is to discharge the treated effluent n 0 CITY OP CU MONT MINUTES into the marnh rind that Lhc cll.:.tit:r.ibution systain can be constructed by bnr.gon Without disl:urbing tilt, marnh. This is a natural process of wanto L•r.oaL•mont that: should not conLaminat:c the Chain of: Lakes. The majority of the marnh .is owned by the County, the discharge area in owned by Mr.. Harmon. Mr. Ilarmon has agreed to allow the ^.ity to utilize the marsh area. 111h.i.s plan will be presented to the regulatory agencies tf Lhe Council. wishes to persue this treat- ment method. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Byrd stated that he supports the waLland proposal - Con - Copt G. Ile asked to have Councilman Thomas' letter introduced as a matter of: record into the meeting. lie slated that he was concerned about an article in the paper. in -which Councilman Thomas made many comments regarding the marshland alternative. The quotations in the article disturbed Councilman Byrd in that there appears to be some conflict of interest between his duties to the Commission and his duties to some organization he is organizing to make bat- tle with the Council. Councilman Byrd stated that the City operates under a Charter with a Council/Manager form of government, and the Council makes the decisions, and not by intimidation. tie praised the quality of the treated water and showed samples of it in com- parison to tap water and lake water. Councilman Byrd then stated that the wetland system will work, and it is safe as reported in the study, and safety controls can be built into the'systdm; _ Mayor Smoak asked if anyone wanted to make a statement and Council- man Thomas replied. lie stands by his report and is against using the marshland for disposal of the City's treated effluent. He would still like to study the Concept G more, but remains opposed. Ile stated that landspreading would be the best alternative since there would be no chance of polluting our lakes. City Manager Forbes gave a report on economic considerations and the EPA inno- vative technology program. The Chair recognized Councilman Meginley. lie stated he was elected to the Council to do a job in the best- interest of Clermont. Ile was in favor of the marshland alternative in that it is simply mother nature assisting us in removing nutrients from the City's treated effluent. The Council has been trying to accomplish this in the past several years in a manner that would be acceptable to DER and the citizens of Clermont, without disturbing the ecology, and by incorporating a monitoring system into the program in order to assure it is the best method available. The Mayor then stated that if at any time any research- er or scientist in the community can show the Council that a deli- torius effect on the ground water or surface water will be created in our :hain of lakes by the marshland alternative, he would be the first one to remove the system. EFFLUENT DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVE The floor was open for a motion. Councilman Byrd made the motion to rescind persuing Concept No. 4 by this Council and this motion was seconded by Councilman Meginley. The vote of the council was unanimous and the motion adopted. The Mayor asked if there were any other motions. Councilman Byrd moved that the City of Clermont, the City Manager, the City Attorney, and the City Engineers contin- ue to persue and to present to the appropriate regulatory authorities the Concept of Wetland Disposal using the freshwater marsh, seconded by Mr. Meginley. The Mayor asked for the vote. Councilmen Meginley Byrd, and Mayor Smoak voted aye, and Councilman Thomas voting naya. The motion was adopted. The meeting adjourned at 8:00 P.M. 1,11:(IO TO: City Counc l 1. FROM: Ueorge D. Foncon - (acy manngcr SUBJECT: Flood Control, Ordlnancon DAT1:: February 21., 1980 BACKGROUND The City's current Flood Control. Regul.alloan were adopted by Resolution in .lanunry of 1974. 8as.tcally the Resolution simply sLatea that the Ctty Is to review all building perncLLs and subdiv,tsion propouals to Insure that they are safe from [Load- ing. L'hls Resolution was adopted to comply with the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program. Tha purpose of the Federal Flood Insurance Program is to provide a federal sub- sidy to assist private companies in writing flood insurance. The government does not get directly involved in the flood insurance business, but guarantees private insurance companies that they will not suffer massive losses in case of a disaster. However, persons within the City limits are generally not eligible for federally backed flood insurance unless the City Council authorizes participation by agreeing to comply with the Federal Flood Regulations. Therefore, City Council authoriza- tion is a prerequisite to participation by private citizens. City participation in this program is important because the Federal Government generally requires federal Flood Insurance for tiny mortgages on property located in a Flood Hazard Area. FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM The Federal Flood Insurance Administration has prepared a Flood hazard Soundry Map for the City of Clermont. This map was prepared by the best available infor- mation that the Federal Government could obtain, and is only intended as a tem- porary map until. a more detailed Flood Insurance Rate flap is prepared. Engineers hired by the Flood Insurance Administration will perform a detailed survey of the City from which flood elevations for a 100 year flood will be determined, and the final rate map composed. Until the rate map is prepared, the City is participating under the Emergency Program, which permits the sale of Flood Insurance in the City limits of Clermont until the rate map is complete. The City's Flood Hazard Boundry flap only delineates areas of special flood hazard - without giving base flood water elevations for a hundred year flood. In other words, it shows areas of flooding but does not give the elevation of the height of the flood water. The flood hazard maps are based on what is known as a hun- dred year flood, or a flood that has a probability of occuring once in a 100 year period. d ORDINANCE NO. 203 The City adopted the required I'Lood I'laln Mansgmcnt Regulations: 9n 1,974 an([ since that time has been part Ielpatltilt I,n Cho Mond Innurnncc, program. Ilowuver, revised Flood Insurance RegulaLl.onn ]love hecn 1.11 effort since Deel.nnhel' 1., 1.976, and the City should amend exlaLl.nl, codes Co comply wtLh theno r.egnlntlonn. Ordinance 203 ndopCn the major revisions required by the Flood insurance AdmInin- trntion,and if this Ordinance In adopCud it would: 1. Only perL•nin to properties .Located within Zen(, A of the I'lood Hazard Ares delineated by the CI.Cy's Flood Hazard Boundry Map. 2. Requires the City Lo use t'hc best aval.labic Information Co insure that all new buildings or suhdlvisionn are snfe from flood ng. All new construcCion or substantial improvemenCs of reaiden L•'1al Htructurea must have the lowest floor elevated 18" above Chu 1.00 year flood elevation. Non residential consL•ructlon must meet these Same requirements with one exception. Commercial structures can be flood proofed or have the .lowest floor elevated at least 18" above the flood elevation. 3. New Mobile home Parks are prohibited from being .located :In a Flood Hazard Zone 4. All utilities in this Zone must be designed to minimize or eliminate the infiltration of flood waters. 5. Provide for a variance procedure. IMPLEMENTATION These regulations require the City to use the best available data to determine the 100 year flood elevations until the Flood Insurance Adminlntrati.on Engineers prepare a final Base Flood Elevation Map. In order to determine the 100 year flood elevation the City Engineer and the City Manager have coordinated our efforts with the County. For the Clermont- Chain of Lakes, 99' above sea level, is considered the one hundred year flood elevation. New buildings must then have the lowest floor elevated 18" above this Level. The City Engineer also obtained from the County the Comprehensive Drainage Plan for Lake County. This plan has hydrolic evaluations for all the Lakes within Clermont. The attached regulations should be considered to give the City Staff more guidance and control over development in flood hazard areas. The City has basically been going by the standards for a few years, and we have not encountered any problems. .j Respectfully, ) f'. l / George D. Forbes City Manager (' GDF:pm.:: Attachments _� ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FLOOD PREVENTION REGULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY MUNICIPALITIES IN THE FEDERAL INSURANCE PROGRAM; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, 11HREDY ORDAINS THAT: ARTICLE I. PURPOSE It is the purpose of this ordinance to promote the public hoalth, nafety, and general welfare by minimizing the loan of property or lira due to flood conditions. ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in thin ordinance shall be interpreted pursuant to the zoning regulations of the City of Clermont, or as to give them the meaning they have in conunon usage. (1) Flood !hazard Boundary Map (F1hBM): The official map insued by the Federal Insurance Administration where the areas of special flood hazards have been designated as Zone A. (2) !habitable Floor: Any floor usable for living purposes, which includes working, sleeping, eating, cooking,or recreation, etc. A floor used only for storage purposes is not a "habitable floor". (3) Substantial Improvement: Any repair, reconstruction, or improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50% of the market value of the structure either: a. Before the improvement or repair is started; b. If the structure has been damaged and is being restored, before damage secured. The term does not include: a. Any project for improvement of a structure to comply with existing state or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which are solely necessary to assure safe living conditions. b. Any alteration of a structure listed in the National Register of Historic Places or a State Inventory of historic places. (4) Base Flood Elevation: A flood having a 1% chance of being equalled or exceeded in any given year. (5) Development: Any man-made change to improved or unimproved real estate, including but not limited to: buildings, structures, dredging, filling, grading, paving, etc. (6) Area of Special Flood Hazard: Land subject to a 1% or greater chance of flooding any given year, and located in Zone A of the Flood Hazard Boundary Map. ARTICLE II1. GENERAL PROV08 Thio ordinance shall apply to all lands within the City of Clermont locntod within 'Lone A of the City Flood Hazard Boundary Map. 11CTION 1. Compliance. No structure or land shall hereafter be constructed or structurally nitorod without full, compliance with the tormn of thin ordinance. However, where this ordinance and another conflict or overlap, whichever imponos the most stringent rentrictionn shall provail. SECTION 1. Building Permits. Building permits uhnll be required for all proposed construction within n apoclal flood hazard area. The Building Official shall review all building permit applications for compliance with this ordinance. All applications for building permits within Zone A of the FIIBM shall contain the following information no applicable: a. Elevation in relation to mean sea level (mnl.) of tl:e lowest floor (Including basement) of all proposed structures. b. Elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any non-residentinl structure will be flood -proofed. C. Certification by a registered professional engineer or architect that any non-residential flood -proofed structure meets the flood -proofing criteria of Article IV, Section 7 of this Ordinance. d. Description of the extent to which any watercourse will be altered or relocated as a result of the proposed development. SECTION 3. Building Permit Review. The Building Official of the City of Clermont must review all building permits or subdivisions to insure that: a. The permittee has been advised that additional federal or state permits may be required, and if specific federal or state permits are known, require that copies of such permits be provided and maintained on file with the building permit. b. Review all development permits to determine if the proposed development will adversely effect the flood carrying capacity of the flood plain. For the purposes. of this ordinance, "adversely effects" means damage to adjacent property due to rises in flood stages attributed to physical changes of the channel and the adjacent overbank areas. If it is determined that there is no adverse effect, then development may proceed within the provisions of this ordinance. If it is determined that there is an adverse effect, the development may not proceed unless technical justification by a registered professional engineer for the proposed development is provided by the permittee. c. The development of building is in compliance with Article IV, CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS of this Ordinance. BBC'fION Ate, Ra�,c_ardn. Tito Building Official shall maintain the following racordns It, Tito actual oluvation of Lila lowent floor (including bnnement) of tall now or nubstnntially improved atr.ucturon. b. Tito actual alovatimi to which now or nubntall ti.ally improved structures hove buan flood -proofed. c, Any variancon granted from thin ordinance. SRC PION_ 5. Bnno Flood Dnta. When bnna flood elevation data boo not been provided by the Flood Insurance Administration, the Building Official ahall review, obtain, and reasonably utilize tiny base flood elevation data available from a federal, ntate, or other source to administer this ordinance. Micro interpretation in needed an to the exact location of the boundaries of the areun of npocial flood hazard, the building official shall make the nocenuary interpretation. ARTICLE IV. CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS In all areas of special hazard, the following provisions are required: SECTION 6. Residential Construction. New construction or substantial improvement of any residential structure (including mobile home) shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated at least eighteen inches (18") above base flood elevation. - SECTION 7. Non-residential Construction. New construction or substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial or other non-residential structure (including mobile homes) shall either have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated at least eighteen inches (18") above the level of the base flood elevation or, together with ❑ttendent utility and sanitary facilities, be flood -proofed so that below the base flood level the structure is water tight with walls substantially impermeable t ' o the passage of wa ter and with structural components P 8 d hydrodynamic dro static an loads and effects of h of resisting y having the capability buoyancy. A registered professional engineer or architect shall certify that the standards of this subsection are satisfied. SECTION 8. Mobile Home Parks and Anchoring. A. Mobile Home Parks. (1) No new mobile home parks shall be built or placed within Zone A of the Flood Hazard Boundary Map (FHBM). j (2) An evacuation plan indicating alternative vehicular access and escape rouLes must be filed with appropriate disaster preparedness authorities for existing mobile home parks located within Zone A of the FHBM. r 1). Anchoring. (1) All now construction and nubstnntl"l Improvomonts nhall be nnchorad to provonC flotation, collnpaa or lateral movement of Clio structure, (2) All mobllo homon "hall ba anahOrnd to re()ist flotation, callnpoo or lot - Oral movement by providing ovor-tho-top ttan to ground anchor", 5poctfic require- muntn ()hall be thatc (a) Ovor-tho-top tLon be provided at Oach of Cho four cornarn of the mobile hems, with two additional tion par nide ne Intermudjote locations and mubtla homon lean than 50 feet long requiring one additional tie par aide; (b) rramo tics be provided at each corner of tho home with five additional tics per aide at intermediate points and mobile hemcn lean than 50 fact long requiring four additional ties per side; (c) All componentu of the anchoring nyntem be capable of carrying a force of 4,800 pounds; and, (d) Any additions to the mobile home be similarly anchored. SECTION 9. Construction Materials and Methodn. A. All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage. B. All new construction or substantial improvements shall be constructed by methods and practices that minimize flood damage. SECTION10, Utilities. A. All new and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system. B. New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters. C. Onsite waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. SECTION 11. Subdivision Proposals. A. All subdivision proposals shall be consistent with the need to minimize flood damage. B. All subdivision proposals shall have public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electric and water systems located and constructed to minimize flood damage. C. All subdivision proposals shall have adequate drainage provided to reduce exposure to flood hazards. D. Base flood elevation data shall be provided for subdivision proposals and other proposed development which is greater than 50 lots or 5 acres, or as datur:ninod noceannr b the Subdivinlon Adviaa Y Y ry Cammittan. SECTION 12. Alteration of WnCarcuurnan, A. Notify adjacent commuatLtien and tho Strata of Rl.orldn prior to nay alteration or relocation of a wntorcourna, and shall submit evidence of ranch notification to the Federal Innoranco Administration, H. Require that maintenance in provided within tho altured or relocated portion of said watercouraa so that the flood -carrying capacity in not dimininhed, ARTICLE V. VARIANCE'S AND EXCEPTIONS SECTION 13. Variances. Variances from this ordinance may be granted by the City Council of the City of Clermont for new construction or aubntantial improvements to be erected of it lot, only if the following conditions are met: a. A determination that failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional hardship to the applicant. b. A determination that the granting of a varinnce will not result In increased flood heights, additional threats to public safety, extra -ordinary public expense, create nuisances, or victimization of the public. C. Variance shall only be issued upon a determination that the variance is the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief. d. Variances may be issued for the reconstruction, rehabilitation, or !� restoration of structures listed in the National Register of Historic Places or { State Inventory of Historic Places, without regard to the procedures set forth in this section. r, x SECTION 14. Notification to Applicant. The City shall notify all applicants for variances in writing that: a. The issuance of a variance to construct a structure below the base flood level will result in increased premium rates for flood insurance up to amounts as high as $25 of $100 of insurance coverage. b. Construction non -conforming to the provisions of this ordinance increases risks to life and property. SECTION 15. Record of Variance Actions. ;i The City shall maintain a record of all variance actions, including justification Y of their issuance and notification letter to applicants, and report all variances i issued in the annual report to the Federal Insurance Administration. n AWL AdIlk ARTIC.�, VI. WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF , BILITY. The dogreu of flood protection required by thin ordinance in considered runnonable for regulatory purposes and in based on scientific and engineering conniderationn. Larger floods can and will occur on rare occasions. Flood heights may be increnned by man-mado or natural causes. Thin ordinance (loco not Imply that land outuido the areas of apccinl flood hazard or uses permitted Within such arena will be free from flooding or flood damagen. This ordinanca shall not create liability on the part of the City of Clermont or by any officer or employee thereof for any flood damageo that result from reliance on this ordinance or any administrative decision lawfully made thereunder. SECTION 16. Should any section or part of this section be declared invalid by any Court of competent jurisdiction, such adjudications shall not apply or affect any other provision of this Ordinance, except to the extent that the entire section or part of the section may be inseparable in meaning and effect from the section to which such holding shall apply. SECTION 17. This Ordinance shall be published as provided by law and it shall become law and shall take effect upon adoption. First Reading this day of , 1980. Second Reading this day of , 1980. PASSED AND ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, THIS DAY OF , 1980. CITY OF CLERMONT By: CLAUDE E. SMOAK, JR., - Mayor ATTEST: SANDRA 0. ROZAR - City Clerk APPROVED by me this day of 1980. CRRTIFICATI: OF PUBLICATION I IIRRRBY CERTIFY that a certified copy of the foregoing Ordinanco No. wan publiahad an the _,_,_ day of , 1980, in a newspaper of 1;cneral circulation located within the City of Clermont, no required by Florida Statutes 166.041 (3) (a), said date of publication being _days prior to the Second Reading and Final Adoption of the Ordinance. Cn v n D —1 T � r— O O O O S ;Er. N � D � O " D S D � CO1t•��,rr 11 Mir I 11k[ MrryMlrrAil� I No. yo C I 0 C N � 0\/\7\ N'\03NN\W IY 3rf �I a N�� N > N B N El r " a.o' p R =� N O. C p C1. G N CJ) C/ fO� O N n �N7 N d• �"' N 01 O t=n O• 'T O C1 p, lyy0 = C pU OJ N N 41 1 O O 1 ., 'q C1 N cr N y N a NED N N _. O _ co [Y co N5. = '� . a N Co N N 'y 'C y t o m d W o � v p N m r Memo to: City Council From: George D. Forbes City Manager SubjccL; Comprehensive Planning Grant Date: February 21, 1980 Last December the City Council authorized an application to the State Department of Community Affairs for a Comprehensive Planning Grant to implement the City's Sewer Study. On January 18, 1980, I received notification from the Department of Community Affairs that our application had been accepted. The City must now submit the attached contract and scope of services agreement if we wish to proceed wiLh this project. Attached is a letter from the City Engineer explaining the new agreement- for the Sewer Study that includes: 1. Projecting the future needs and demands on the collection system, lift stations, and Waste Treatment Plant. 2. Review the present collection system and determine infiltration sources. --- 3. Make a detailed investigation of methods of flow equalization to increase the capacity and efficiency of the plant. 4. Prepare Study Plans and estimates for recommended improvements. 5. Prepare a Master Plan for the unsewered areas within the present City limits. Essentially the project would be a comprehensive sewer system study equivalent to the water study that was recently completed. The City has been awarded a total grant amount of $6,228. One half of the total grant amount must also be matched by the City. However, the City will not need the entire grant amount for this project, and a breakdown of costs is as follows: COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING GRANT COSTS Engineering Study as delineated in the Scope of Services $ 5,800 TOTAL GRANT AMOUNT $5,800 CITY COSTS 7. Installation of Recording Plow Meter $2,400 Provide City Worker for Infiltration Exam 500 $2,900 TOTAL CITY COSTS TOTAL PROJECT COST $8,700 Page 2 Memo to: City Councl..l. From: Goorge D. Forbut, Date: February 2:1, :1.980 If the City CooncLI wiahee to proceed wLL•h this project we moat: L. Execute tho ::ttnched agreement with the State of Florida. 2. Approve the Scope or. Servicee with CUe City Engineer. I recommend that tl:e City proceed with LMS project. Respectfully, /9 George D. Forbes City Manager GDF:pm Attachments ASPIM 01 CITY OF CLERMONT P.O. BOX 219 • CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711 • PHONE 004/304•d001 February 18, 1980 HEMO TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer Re: Sewer Study As you know, it has been necessary for us to delay the sewer study pending the purchase of equipment to more accurately determine the flow rates through the waste treatment plant. However, enough research has been done to indicate the scope of the study should be expanded. We suggest our present agreement be terminated and a new agreement be executed utilizing the L.G.C.P.A. Grant which the City has received. SCOPE OF NEW AGREEMENT 1. Using the present number of sewer connections daily and monthly flow data, we will project future needs and demands on the collec- tion system, lift stations, and waste treatment plant. 2. We will review the present collec+ion system and make recommend- ation to determine infiltration sources. (City to provide one (1) helper for two (2) weeks). 3. Make a detailed investigation of methods of flow equalization at the waste treatment plant to extend its capacity and increase its efficiency. i February 18, 1980 MEMO (cont.) SCOPE OF NEW AGREEMENT 4. Prepare study plans and estimates for recommended improvements. 5. Prepare master plan for unsewered areas within the present City LIM ts. Our estimate for the cost of this study is $5,800.00. In addition to the above tests, the City would need to expend the following: Installation of recording flowmeter R2,400.00 y:o.aa Provide City worker for infiltration examination .Aee-. FO $2,900.00 AGREEMENT An Agreement made this day, February 26, 1980, between the CITY OF CLERMONT, hereinafter called the "Owner", and SFRINGSTEAD AND ASSOCIATES, INC., hereinafter called the "Engineer". WHEREAS the Owner on October 25, 1978 authorized the Engineer to proceed with a study of the City sewer system to initiate future planning at a cost not to exceed $3,800.00 and WHEREAS the Engineer in the process of making this study has determined that more adequate measurement devices are needed at the sewage treatment plant in order to complete the study, that fluctuating flows through the sewage treatment plant create difficulties in maintain- ing plant efficiencies, that the collection system has severe infiltration problems, and that certain sections of the City are not sewered, all of which were unknown to the Engineer at the time of the original agreement and WHEREAS the Engineer has determined that it would be in the best interests of the Owner to terminate the October 25, 1978 authorization and enter into a new agreement for an expanded study to include the before mentioned items not in the original authorization, and WHEREAS the Engineer agrees that he has been paid in full for work performed to date under the original authorization; THEREFORE, the Engineer agrees to perform an expanded study of the Owners sewer system including the following items: 1. Using the present number of sewer connections, daily and monthly flow data, he will project future needs and demands on the collection system, lift stations, and waste treatment plant. 2. Review and examine the present collection system and make recommendation to correct infiltration problems. 3. Make a detailed investigation of methods of flow equalization at the waste treatment plant to extend its capacity and increase its efficiency. h. Prepare study plans and estimates for recommended improvements. B. Prepare master plan for unsewered areas within present City Limits. The Owner agrees to pay to the Engineer the sum of $5 800.00 for the above described work. The Owner also agrees to install flow measuring equipment at the sewage treatment plant to enable the Engineer to perform Item Ill above. At an estimated cost of $2,400.00. The Owner also agrees to provide one City worker for two weeks to assist the Engineer in performing Item #2 above at an estimated cost of $&0. Do. The Owner also agrees to pay the Engineer on a monthly basis upon the submission of invoices for work performed on this agreement each month.'"The total of such monthly payments shall not exceed $5,800.00. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE Owner and the Engineer have executed this agreement as of the date first written above. - - - CITY OF CLERMONT - By: TITLE: SPRINGSTEAD AND ASSOCIATES, INC. By: TITLE: I1EM0 '11O: C'lty CouncH FROM: Ocor.ge D. Farbcs City Mnool;cr. SDIl.1IXT: RccreaLion C0101I11.L'L'ce ItcparL DATE: February 21, 1.9110 At'Lflchefl !s n report from the Recreation Committee regardinP their 1979-80 budget recommendnLiens. You wll.l. recall, that the City has $10,000 for recreation actavl.tlmt Ln this year.'n budget. AL the Council Meeting, we will conduct a Public Dearing on these recommenda- tions, which include: 1. luring it Summer Recrention Supervisor to organize and conduct n series of Summer. Youth Programs 2. Develop a Park on existing City Property in the Orange lull Area. 3. Allow the Key Club and Engle Scouts to construct picnic tables and cookout facilities in Sunnyside Drive Park. They will also place soccer posts at the Puddle School Park, if approved by the School. 4. Charge fees for non-residents involved :in the Baseball Programs starting this season. 5. Fence and charge admission fees to non-residents for entrance into Jaycee Beach and the boat ramp. 6. Seek potential sites and funding for an outdoor recreation complex. Respectfully, George D. Forbes City Manager GDP:pm Attachments AM CITY OF CLSRIVIONT P.O. BOX 210 • CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711 PI ION 004/304 4001 Momo to: Recreation Committcu From: George D. rorben City Manager Subject: Recreation Committee Meeting Date: February 14, 1980 The next meeting of the Recreation Committee will be held on February 20th at 7:30 p.m. in the City Managers Office. The purpose of this meeting is to review final Recreation Committee's report on this years funding. Thank you for your continued cooperation, and if you have any questions, please feel free to contact Dennis Thomas or myself. Sincerely, j George D. Forbes City Manager CDF:pm PUBLIC HEARING CLERMONT RECREATION CO*11TT1`,E FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Tuesday, February 26th, 1980 7:70 p.m. - City Council Chambers 828 DeSoto Street, Clermont Fees For non-residents, City Park Improvements, Jaycee leach and other recommendatians will be considered. TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE SOUTH LAKE PRESS ON February 21, 1980 Almh AM U19 CITY OF CLIE6aMONT P.O. BOX 210 • CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711 • PHONE 904/394•A001 February 4, 1980 Mr. Bob Wear 420 North Street Clermont, Florida 32711 Dear Mr. Wear: Tl:e City Council of the City of Clermont will be holding a Public Nearing on the recommendations of the City Recreation Committee on Tuesday, February 26th at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. As you may be aware, the Recreation Committee's recommendations include the funding of a Park in Orange Hill. The City's partic- ipation would include fencing the playground and purchasing swing sets. As we previously discussed, your organization along with neighbor- - hood residents would construct the tire maze and other facilities shown on the attached map. The Recreation Committee has requested that you send to my office a letter of commitment for this project. They also request that you and other interested residents appear at the February 26th Public Nearing. Bob, I appreciate the concern you have shown for our community. By working together, we can make Clermont a better place to work and live. Thank you for your cooperation, and if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, George Forbes City Manager CF:pm Enclosure CITY OF CL..IERMONT �•..�.• P.O. BOX 21D • CLERMONT, FLORIDA V711 • PIIONf: 9ENI314 40111 February 4, 1980 Mr. Prank Stellrnn 2251 SOULIt Luke Shore Drive Clermont, Florida 92711 Dear Mr. Stearns: 'I'he City Council of the City of Clermont will be. holding a Public Hearing on the recommendations of tile City Recreation inmittee on 'ruenday, Februnry 26th tit 7:90 p.m. theCity Council bars. As you are aware, the Recreation commi.ttee's recommendations will include your liugla Scout and Key Club protects which are: 1• 8uilding Picnic Table/Cookout Facilities at the suanyside Drive Park. 2. Constructing soccer posts at the Pingnolin Street park. I'ha Recreation Committee has requested tint you send to my office a letter of commitment for these projects. They would also re- quest that you attend Cite February 26th PI,blic Hearing if possible, Frank, I appreciate Lite concern you have shown for our conmumity. It's young men like you that make the future for Clermont bright. By working together, we can make Clermont a better place to work and live. Thank you for your consideration, and if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me., Sincerely, Dennis Thomas Chairman The lice reaLlonal uepartment CF: pat STATE ON FLOIt11)A I D11,11ARTMENT OF Uoh Oruham. (iowrllm Health & Rehabilitative Services Dlatrlct Three WIT11LACOOC11EE S.T.O.P. CAMP Post• Office Box 161, Lacoocheo, Florida 33537 FEB 18 February 15, 1900 Mr. George Forbes, City Manager City of Clermont Post• Office Box 219 Clermont•, Florida 32711 Door George, Sorry for the delay in responding to your letter of February 4, 1980. I was pleased to hear that the matter of a new park in Orange Mill is up for City Council consideration on February 26, 1980. Please consider this my personal commitment to take an active part in the construction of the aforementioned. facility. Further, that the Short Term Offender Program, a State of Florida Youth Services Program facility, shall also participate in this worth- while project. I only hope that the enthusiasm of months ago can be rekindled in the Orange Hill community. It was good hearing from you and I look forward to meeting with you and the Council. Sincerely, Robert A. Wear Superintendent Short Term Offender Program C. t n �i A CITY OF CLERMONT !✓_' � P.O. BOX 219 • CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711 • PHONE 004/394-4081 MEMO TO: Recreation Committee Members FROM: George D. Forbes City Manager SUBJECT: Public Hearing on Recommendations DATE: February 22, 1980 Please remember to attend next Tuesdays City Council Meeting that will be held on February 26, 1980 in the City Council Chambers at 7:30 p.m. The Recreation Committee Report will be on the Agenda for the -- meeting, and Mary Shaw has volunteered to give the presenta- tion. However, she will need your support. Attached is a copy of the Recreation Report as revised at the last meeting. Sincerely, 61 George D. Forbes City Manager GDF:pm Attachments TO: City Council. VROM: Recreation Committee SUBJECT: 1979-80 PY Recommendations DATE: Pebruary 20, 1990 I. YOUTH PROGRAMS A. Recreation. The Recreation Committee recommends that the �y Lund a series of: Summer Youth Programs. A list of potential programs is attached. These programs would be organized and supervised by a Summer Recreation Supervisor. The Committee anticipates that the supervisor would work approximately 20 hours per week, through the summer. Estimated Cost . . . . . $.1,2n0.00 II. PARK DEVELOPMENT A. orange Hill Park. It is recommended that a park be devel- op_ged in Orange Hill with both public and private partic- ipation. The City has received a petition and layout drawing for a park to be constructed in this area. City participation would include the construction of a fence and swing sets. Mr. Bob S,tear is a resident of this area and has agreed to work with the interested local citizens and construct the balance beam, tire maze, tether ball, and agility run projects. His letter of support is attached. Estimated Cost . . . . . $2,300.00 B. Sunnyside Drive Park. Mr. Prank Stearns, as part of an P•.agle Scout and Ivey Club Project has agreed to construct picnic tables and cookout facilities at the Sunnyside Drive Park. They will also construct soccer posts at the Middle School Park, if approved by the School. Estimated Cost . . . . . $ N/A III. BASEBALL. The Committee recommends that the following fee schedule be adopted for non-residents involved. in the base- ball programs. A. $10.00 fee per person for adult softball. B. $5.00 per person for Little League and Babe Ruth Programs, Jr. and Senior Girls Softball. The intent of this fee is to be placed in a fund for Recrea- tion Programs. Each team would be required to submit a list of eligible players with the above fees for non-residents. The Committee recommends that this fee system be implemented this year. Page 2 1110: city Council. FROM: Recreational Committee Date: February 20, 1980 3:V. JAYCEE BEACH. T)io Committee analyzed the following options for {mp—rov`E-ng Jc:ycoo Beach: 1. Fencing Jaycee Beach from the boatramp to Bell Ceramics; 2. Allowing the concessionaire, or hiring City employees to charge frees for the beach; 3. Ro-routing Lake Minneola Drive and charging fees as persons park their. cars. (This option is not presently feasible, since the State owns the right-of-way.) A. Raving a service organization charge fees for the beach. (This option was not considered feasible since it required too much of a long term commitment.) After considering all of the above options, the Recreation Committee recommends that: A. A four foot fence be constructed from the present four foot fence to the boat dock on the west, and to the Bell Ceramics property on the East. This fence would be con- structed with three public access gates for charging fees. Estimated Cost $5,500.00 B. A fee be charged for non-residents on weekends and Holidays from Memorial Day to Labor Day as follows: 1. 50" Adult use of beach. j 2. 25C Children use of beach. 3. $1.50 use of boat ramp and Driver. (The Boat Ramp fee could be charged every day throughout the Summer.) Clermont residents would be able to pick-up a card at City Hall and obtain admission at no charge to the above facilities. Also, Season Tickets could be purchased at City Hall for non-residents at the following prices: 1. Boat Ramp - 825.00 per season. 2. Beach - $5.00 per person; $15.00 family membership The present City concessionaire has been contacted about the possibility of collecting and taking a percentage of the fees, and is interested. ;;; Pago 3 710: city Council FROM: Rocroati.onal. Commi.I.Lan DATE: February 20, 1000 IV. 13. Continued The Recreation Committee would recommend that possible. sources of grant funding also he investigated. This would be expanded to .include new restroomn and remodeling L•he concossion stand. It is also recommended that Lilo City Attorney investigate the possibilities of: gaining public access to blest Beach. V. OUTDOOR RrCREATIOM COMPLEX. The Committee recommends that they be allowed to seek potential sites and funding sources for an outdoor recreation complex (approximately 20-30 acres) that would include new softball diamonds as well as open space for soccer and other activities. We believe that if the above programs are funded, it would allow the City to meet the short term objectives listed in the Recreation Report. A summary of the funding recommendations is as follows: Recreation Supervisor . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,200.00 Orange Hill Park . . . . . . . . . . . 2,300.00 Jaycee Beach Fencing . . . . . . . . . 5,500 Other (Supplies, Signs, Printing, and Contingencies . . . . . . . . 1,000.00 TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $10,000.00 Respectfully, The Recreation Committee of the City of Clermont Committee Members, Dennis Thomas, Chairman Beth Allison Adolphos Church Ray McMahon Mary Shaw Gerald Shepard GDF:pm Enclosures PROPOSED ACTT,VITI95 1980 CJ.ERMONT SUMMT�;R YOUTH PROCIP.AMS ACTIVITY: Baseball./Softball DAY & TIME., 'Tuesday and Thur.silay, 1:00 - 3:00 p.m. PLACE: 12th Street Baseball Fioldn SPONSOR.: ACTIVITY: Soccer. DAY & TIME: Monday, 1:00 - 3:00 p.m. PLACE: City Park on Seminole Street, between Holly and Fourth St. SPONSOR: ACTIVITY: Tag Football DAY & TIME: Wednesday, 1:00 - 3:00 p.m. PLACE: City Park on Seminole Street, between Holly and Fourth St. SPONSOR: _ ACTIVITY: Basketball DAY & TIME: Friday, 9:00 - 12:00 noon PLACE: Elementary School Courts SPONSOR: _ ACTIVITY: :i Beginner Swimming Lessons DAY & TIME: Wednesday (June only), 9:00 - 10:00 a.m. PLACE. Jaycee Beach SPONSOR: ACTIVITY: National Safety Town DAY & TIME: July 13-15th, 9:00 - 11:00 a.m. PLACE: Jenkins Auditorium SPONSOR: ACTIVITY: Teen Dances DAY & TIME: June 7th, July 5th, August 2nd, 9:00 - 11:30 p.m. PLACE: Jenkins Auditorium SPONSOR: i f ACTIVITY: Field Trips DAY & TIME Wet N' Wild, Friday, June 20th, 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. & PLACE: Disney World, Friday, July 18th 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. Sea World, Friday, August 15th, 9:00 a.m. - 4:OO p.m. SPONSOR Other sessions in which the time and place are to be announced: 1. Bowling G. Skating 2. Photography Class 7. Tennis Lessons 3. Arts & Crafts 8. Golf Lessons 4. Shuffleboard 9. Volleyball 5. Jazzercise Classes -1 STA'PL Oil FLORIDMUM DEPARTMENT QF mdr gruhnm, rnirs nar Health & Rehabilitative Services District Three wITHLACOOCHCC s,T.O.P. CAMP Post Office Box 161, Lacoochee, Florida 33537 FEB i a February 15, 1980 Mr. George Forbes, City Manager City of Clermont Post Office Box 219 Clermont, Florida 32711 Dear George, Sorry for the delay in responding to your letter of February 9, 1980. i I was pleased to hear that the matter of a new park in Orange Hill is up for City Council consideration on February 26, 1980. Please consider this my personal commitment to take an active part in the construction of the aforementioned facility,. Further,_ that the Short Term Offender Program, a State of Florida Youth Services Program facility, shall also participate in this worth- while project. I only hope that the enthusiasm of months ago can be rekindled in the Orange Hill community. It was good hearing from you and I look forward to meeting with you and the Council. Sincerely, ` Robert A. wear d superinten ent Short Term Offender Program MEMO TO City Council FROM: George D. Forbes City Mnnuger SI1B.11•iCT: Weekly Memo DATE: February 22, 1.980 VISI'rOITS WLI'II BUSINESS. Uan Judy and Anthony Sides have requested to he placed on ilia Council Agendn. Mr. Judy hall a complaint rellnrding n water meter, and n memo explaining this situation in in your Council paeketn. Mr. Sides is from Mascotte and he is interested in operating a Shuttle Bus Service Clint would pick-up passengers in Clermont. lie would operate within a 25 mile radius of Mascotte and take passengers to Orlando and area attractions. This operation would utilize 10 to 12 passenger vans as well an full size busses. Mr. Sides is requesting that the City Council send a letter of recommendation on the need of such service to the Federal Interstnte Commerce Commission and Florida Public Service Commission. UTILITY DEPARTMENT. The Utility Department is repairing a Lift Station pump at Lift Station I1 2 that services Emerald Lakes. When this Lift Station was conntructed the pump loge were laid into the concrete floor making the pump very difficult to repair. We first had to chisel the pump legs out of the concrete. Also, we have been flushing out the water mains in the City. Since we started a monthly flushing program about three months ago, the number of rusty water complaints has been almost eliminated. The Utility Department has also been installing an electric flow meter on the return sludge line at the Treatment plant. This meter will help us determine the hydrolic loading of the clarifier, and should increase the efficiency of the plant operation. PUBLIC WORKS. This week we are still working on getting the ballfields in shape. We are hauling clay from the County and had the lights repaired at Bishop - Field. We are 'also continuing the street striping program for the City. Our second garbage truck is back in operation, so garbage collection is back to normal. JAYCEE BEACH. The Public Works Department sets out floats in the water at Jaycee Beach to form a safety line beyond which swimmers are not to proceed. However, every year most of these floats are sunk through vandalism. About a year ago, we had 9 floats up, and now we are down to 3. For this reason, we would like to place 9 to 18 white PVC pipes in the water instead of the floats. The pipe would be filled with reinforccl concrete and sunk four feet into the lake bottom. We would then place signs up stating, "No Swimming Beyond the White Markers." We believe that the pipes would be much more resistant to vandalism, yet still be excellent markers. The City crews could install the pipes. Page 2 Weelcly Ruport Pubrunry 22, 1.900 PUBLIC SI'RV1CH CWNISSION. Attached are nome notices from the Florida Public Service Canminuion regarding Motor Carrier Licennan. CLERMONT JUNIOR IITC11 ADVISORY BOARD. 1 have received a letter from the Clormont Junior High Advinory Ilonrd regarding the School Cronsing on State Road 50 at Bloxnm and East Avenue. While the InLernection in marked an a School Creasing, the Advinory Board be.11oves that there is a problem in that few people observe the School Zone limit at this lnternoction, especially when the light is green. They request that the City ask DOT to provide caution lights on the School Zone Signs to warn drivers that this intersection is a School Crossing. If there is no objection by the City Council, I will write a letter to DOT and request this action. MARSH STUDY. 'Thursday afternoon the City Engineers, myself and Mayor Smoak met with officials from the State Department of Environmental Regulation regarding the South Marsh Alternatives. I T believe that some progress was made at this conference and I will keep you informed. �. PTIIIA LOAN. The City'" FMIIA Loan for the Water System improvements In almost completed. ( A tentative data for loan closing ceremony has been set for next Wednesday, Feb- ruary 270, in the City Managers Office at 1:00 p.m. All City Council members should attend this ceremony if possible. Respectfully, I George D. Forbes I( City Manager GDF:pm! Attachments ' FE6 9, BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE WMMISSION In ro; Application of Florida Limouainc ) DOCKET NO. 800104-CCB Service, Inc., d/b/a Florida Tour G Limo for a certificate. ) ISSUED. 2-18-80 NOTICE OF FILING OF'APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE•, OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY TO OPERATE AS A MOTOR CARRIER Pursuant to the provisions of Section 323.03(2), Florida Statutes, as been NloridatPublic bService Comisaionpsockingnahcertificatecofwith e public convenience and necessity to operate as it motor carrier by Florida Limousine Service, Inc., d/b/a Florida Tour 6 Limo, Orlando Inter- national Airport, 5400 McCoy Road, P. 0. Box 13775, Orlando, Florida 32809. Said application seeks authority for a common carrier certificate for authority (a) to remove its vehicle capacity restriction from certificate number 737, so as to authorize charter movements (without regard to vehicle size) from points in Orange, Osceola, and Lake Counties, from points west of I-95 in Volusia _. County, and from points in Polk County north and east of the intersection of U. S. highway 27 and Interstate Highway 4, and a two mile radius thereof, to all points in Florida; and (b) special operations authority from points in Orange, Osceola, Seminole and Lake Counties, from points west of I-95 in Volusia County, and from points in Polk County north and east of the intersection of U. S. 27 and Interstate Highway 4, and a two mile radius thereof, to all points in Florida and return, over irregular routes and irregular schedules. NOTICE is further given that any objections or protests to said application must be filed in writing with the Commission and served upon the applicant on or before thirty (30) days after service of this notice, stating fully the basis for such objections or pro- tests. If no such written protests are filed with the Commission within said period, the Commission may dispose of the application without oral hearing. By DIRECTION of the Florida Public Service Commission, this 18th., day of February, 1980. Carolyn S. Chalker ( S E A L ) (�0�- J _�nGCG�Xy�/rG�✓ Mr. Robert B. Nadeau, Jr., P. 0. Box 231, Orlando, or da 32802, is the attorney for the applicant. HDB BEFORE )FLORIDA PUBLIC SERMN, � �f.SS'LOCI in re: Revision of certain deposit ) DOC1CIYl' t1o. 790697•,RU1,li. (MT) rules for Electric, Gas, Telephone ) ORDER (10. 9236-A and Water and Serer Utilities. ) ISSUEM 2-10-80 AMENDATORY ORDER BY THE COMMISSION: The purpose of this order .is to clarify and further d.lscuor, the reasons for the Commission's action takon in Order Ho. 9236 on the Notions that had bean filed pursuant to Section 120.54(1.6), F.S., asking that the rulemaking proceeding be uuspanded and that: the Commission convene a separate proceeding under Section 120.57, F.S. Section 120,54(16), P.S., provides that an agency may do this where a person timely asserts that his substantial inLcrests will be affected in the proceeding and affi.rmat:ively demonstrates to the agency that the rulemaking proceeding does not pro_�Tdc adi.quatc opportunity to protect those interests. (emphasis supplied) - No exception is taken to the movants' assertion that their substantial interests would be affected, but we find that the movants have not sufficiently demonstrated that the rulemaking pro- ceeding would not provide an adequate opportunity to protect those interests, particularly with the safeguards we have added. Section 120.54(3) requires an affected person be given an opportunity to present evidence and argument on all issues. We furthc:r._enlarged ___.. the scope of the hearing to give all parties the right to cross- examine and submit proposed findings of facts. Consequently, we think we easily fall within the holdingof anluio v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Fla. Aph. 3?0. lTTc—(�97II), which was cited by one of the movants. In that case, the petitioners had sought to call and examine witnesses, to cross-examine witnesses and to invoke the rule excluding witnesses from the proceedings while other witnesses were testifying. The hearing officer denied these requests and said Lhat only comments or statements could be received and when the petitioners requested a 120.57 "draw out", he denied that request also. The court said on p. 24: "The officer conducting the hearing must make every BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In re: Application of D.D.EI., ) DOCKET NO. 800094-CCT Inc. for a certificate to trans- ) port lumber from points in Alachua, ) Baker, Bradford, Clay, Columbia, ) Dixie, Duval, Flagler, Levy, ) Nassau, Putnam, Taylor and Union ) Counties, to points in Florida ) in and east of the western boundary ) of Jefferson County, Florida. j ISSUED: 2-18-80 NOTICE OF FILING OF APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY TO OPERATE AS A MOTOR CARRIER Pursuant to the provisions of Section 323.03(2), Florida Statutes, NOTICE is hereby given that an application has been filed with the Florida Public Service Commission seeking a certificate of public convenience and necessity to operate as a motor carrier by D.D.H., Inc., P. 0. Box 459, Middleburg, Florida 32068. Said application seeks authority for a common carrier certificate to transport lumber from points in Alachua, Baker, Bradford, Clay, Columbia, Dixie, Duval, Flagler, Levy, Nassau, 'Putnam, Taylor and Union Counties to points in Florida in and east of the western boundary of Jefferson County. NOTICE is further given that any objections or protests to said application must be filed in writing with the Commission and served ' upon the applicant on or before thirty (30) days after service of this notice,,stating fully the basis for such objections or pro- tests. If no such written protests are filed with the Commission within said period, the Commission may dispose of the application without oral hearing. By DIRECTION of the Florida Public Service Commission, this 18th.1day of February, 1980. ( S E A L ) Car yn S. Chalker Deputy Clerk Mr. Sol H. Proctor, 1101 Blackstone Building, Jacksonville, Florida 32202, is the attorney for the applicant. HDB BEFORE 1. r''FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE G,_.iISSION in rc: Application of Choice Delivery) DOCKET No. 800052-CCT Systems of Florida, Inc., d/b/a Choice) Delivery Systems, for extension of ) 2_lp_p0 Certificate No. 1219. ) ISSUED: AMENDED NOTICE OF FILING Pursuant to the provisions of Section 323.03(2), Florida Statutes, NOTICE is hereby given that an application has been filed with the Florida Public Service Commission seeking to extend Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity No. 1219 held by Choice Delivery Systems of Florida, Inc., d/b/a Choice Delivery Systems, 11600 N.E- Second Avenue, Miami, Florida 33161. Generally stated, Certificate No. 1219 authorizes the transportation of advertising material and related matter, accounting data and samples of manufactured products; exposed or processed film, prints, electronic tapes and records; whole blood, pacemakers, laboratory samples and other related medical items; data tapes, microfilm and business papers, but restricted against armored car service; - print-outs, data processing parts and lighting supplies; blueprints, plans and related items; flowers and floral arrangements between all points and places in Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Counties on irregular routes and schedules with the shipper having exclusive use of vehicle and all shipments delivered within four hours of pickup. By this application, an extension of the above authority is sought to transport the same items to and from all points and places in Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Counties on the one hand,and all other points and places in the counties lying south of the northern boundary of Citrus, Sumter, Lake and Volusia Counties in the State of Florida with delivery within eight hours of pickup for these d BEFORE ' FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE MISSION In rot Application of Choice Dalivory) DOCKq,v No. 800052-CC'i' 3ystoms of Florida, Inc., d/b/a Choico) Delivery Sy®tams, for nxtennion of ) Certificate No. 1219. ) ISO UED1 2-18-00 AMENDED NOT CICOF_EILING Pursuant to the provisions of: Section 323.03(2), Florida Statutes, NOTICE is hereby given that an application han boon filed with the Florida Public Service Commission seeking to extend Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity No. 1219 held by Choice Delivery Systems of Florida, Inc., d/b/a Choice Delivery Systems, 11GUO N.E. Second Avenue, Miami, Florida 33161. Generally stated, Certificate No. 1219 authorizes the transportation of advertising material and related matter, accounting data and samples of manufactured products; exposed or processed film, prints, electronic tapes and records; whole blood, pacemakers, laboratory namples and other related medical items; data tapes, microfilm and business papers, but restricted against armored car service; print-outs, data processing parts and lighting supplies; blueprints, plans and related items; flowers and floral arrangements between all points and places in Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Counties on irregular routes and schedules with the shipper having exclusive use of vehicle and all shipments delivered within four hours of pickup. By this application, an extension of the above authority is sought to transport the same items to and from all points and places in Dade, Broward and - - - Palm Beach Counties on the one hand, and all other points and places in the counties lying south of the northern boundary of Citrus, Sumter, Lake and Volusia Counties in the State of Florida with delivery within eight hours of pickup for these movements. The exclusive use of vehicle restriction is sought to be removed. NOTICE is further given that any objections or protests to said application must be filed in writing with the Commission and served upon the applicant on or before thirty (30) days after the date of service of this Notice, stating fully the basis for such objections or protests. If no such written objections or protests are filed with the Commission within said period, the Commission may dispose of the application without oral hearing. By DIRECTION of the Florida Public Service Commission, this 18th., day of February, 1980. Carolyn S. halke/r Mr. Eric J. Bergknoff, Suite 600, 1920 E. Hallandale Beach Boule- vard, Hallandale, Florida 33009, is the attorney for the applicant. HDB MEMO TO; CLty COWHICH FROM: Gcor.ge D. Parben City Manager SUBJECT Water Meter at 651 DeSOLn (MI.nL Wnrul:nune) DATE: February 21., 1980 Mr. Dan Judy has requested to appear before the CLty Council r.egnrdt.ng a water motor and assessment he wan required to pay in order to construct the Mint. Warehouse 'Located at 631 DcSoLO Street. According to Mr. .Judy, when he bought thin property from Jay VanderMeer., he under- stood that the water meter had already been installed, and Mr. VanderMeer had receipts for the payment of this work. however, when he began work nL• this site, he found that the meter was never installed. We have researched the City records for this property, and found that in May of 1972 a Building Permit and Water Meter Permit were received for this property. However, the building was never constructed. In 1972, the City did not install the water meter until a Certificate of Occupancy was issued, and this is the reason the meter was never installed. Mr. Judy insists that because the fee for tlue meter was paid, it should be installed without any additional charge or assessment• fee. However, upon discussing this matter with the City Attorney, a few months ago, we i determined that a refund of the meter payment should be made to Mr.. VanderMeer, who paid for the original meter. Mr. Judy would then pay for the new meter and water assessment. Any agreements over the purchase of the property on the basis that a meter had been installed would be a private matter between Mr. Judy and Mr. VanderMeer. The refund was made to Mr. VanderMeer and Mr. Judy requests to be heard by the City Council, since lie believes he has been unfairly treated in this matter. Respectfully, George D. Forbes City Manager GDF:pm Attachments CITY OF CLERMONT P.O. BOX 219 • CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711 • PHONE 004/304.4001 February 27, 1980 First Baptist Church 720 Fifth Street Clermont, Florida 32711 Att: Mr. Dan Judy, Chairman Properties Committee Dear Mr. Judy: This letter is to inform you that the City Council of the City of Clermont, at their regular meeting held February 26, 1980, approved your request for a variance in order to construct a utility building of 208 square feet in the rear yard of the Church. You can proceed with the project by applying for a building permit at City Hall. Also, please remember that all variances expire one year from the date of approval. Thank you for your cooperation, and if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. I look forward to working with you. Sincerely, George D. Forbes City Manager GDF:pm cc: Harvey Nagel ANIL CITY OF CLERMONT P.O. BOX 219 • CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711 • PHONE D041304.4001 February 27, 1980 Mr. and Mrs. Ilerman Sichterman 6 Sunset Bay Drive Clearwater, Florida 33516 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Sichterman: This letter is to inform you that the City Council of the City of Clermont, at their regular meeting held February 26, 1980, approved your request for a variance in order to construct your home on Lot A, 1419 West Lake Shore Drive, with 83.6' at the building setback line. You can proceed with the project by applying for a building permit at City Hall. Also, please remember that all variances expire one year from the date of approval. Thank you for your cooperation, and if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. I look forward to working with you. Sincerely, / /Jl. George D. Forbes City Manager GDF:pm cc: Harvey Nagel F �DI;ST FIDt_.»_ Da to OWNltlt: Mr.. and Mrn. Horman Sichterman APPLICANT: (;cargo Lavender 11HOPENry: Lot A - Indian HUH SUbdlv:lalon :.WAT10N: 14.19 West• Lake Shore Drive /.ON1NG: R-1-A REOUE.ST: Construction of a home with 83.6' at the building setback line whereas 100' is required. COMMENTS: This is a large pie shaped lot that far exceeds all the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. This home could easily be placed farther back on the lot and meet the Zoning Setback requirements. However, if this home were placed closer to the Lake, it would not conform to the City's flood regulations. The City presently requires all lakefront homes to have a rear yard of 25' from the high water mark, and have the lowest floor elevated above the 100 year flood zone levels. It would not be possible for the home to meet these requirements if it were placed farther back on the lot. The abutting property owners, the Meads and Thompsons, also received variances for these same reasons. Respectfully, George D. Forbes City Manager GDF:pm ^'FASE PRINT OR TYPE TO THE ZONING BOARD OF ADe. :riENT OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA APPLICANT ed NAME:Mr, and Mrn. Ilr,rmnn :achLnrmman ADDRESS: 0 :'unnot Ray Drive Gentlemen: Cloarwaror, 111.orida. 33516 Having posted the necessary $25,00 appeal fee with the City Clerk, 1 hereby make application to your Board for relief from a decision of the Building Official of the City of Clermont, whereby I was refused permission to: Repair ( ), Add to ( ), Alter ( ), Construct (X ), Move and Place ( ), a (sign) building on lot/s - A , Block Subdivision Ik"&Av Address 7 Y'(i W. bar /6 J164X ,Zone RiA Section of Code ? 6 - a 0 G — 1n the City of Clermont, Florida. The reason given by the Building Official for the decision in refusing to issue a building permit is: Plans non -conforming to 100 ft. building line set back in R '1 A Vone. Section, 26 - 20, C 2, My appeal to your Board is based on my contention that this decision creates a hardship on me for the following reason, or reasons: To comply with the requirements for a 100 ft. lot width at the front building lino, tho building, would have to be sot back to within just a few feet of the high water mark. A building cannot be set back for enough on this lot to comply with this restriction. Seven (7) copies of all necessary floor plans, plot plans, and other pertinent infor- mation are attached hereto, on paper size 8y" x 14" minimum size. I submit that I qualify for this variance because I have an exceptional and unique hardship on my particular parcel of land that is not shared by property owners in my area. A strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives me of the reasonable use of my land and the granting of this variance will not alter the essential character of the area. I have been notified that this Variance Application must be filed with the City Clerk no later than 5:00 P.M. on Friday, two (2) weeks prior to the Council meeting at which time Variance will be considered. I also understand that when any variance is granted, construction of the structure must be completed within one year from date of grant. Date: 12 Feb. 1980 Very truly yours, 5/17/77 LEGAL NOTICE pursuant to State Law notice In hereby gtven that the City Council of the City of Clermont, sitting as a Board of Adjustment, will hold a Public Nearing in the Council Chambers located on the corner of Went Avenue and DeSoto Street on Tuesday, February 26, 1980 at approximately 7:70 p.m. to consider the following: A request by Mr. and Mrs. Herman Sichterman for a Variance to Section 26-20-C-2, (RCA URBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT -GENERAL REQUIREMENTS+TRONT YARD SET -BACK) of the Zoning Ordinance in order to construct a residence on their property described oe: Lot A Indian Bills 1419 W. Lake Shorc Drive All interested parties will be given an opportunity to expreen their views on the. matter. George D. Forbes, City Manager City of Clermont, Florida February 21, 1980 Mr. and Mrn. Herman SLchtermnn VarL1111CC Request Property owners within 150 feet of Principal George Karst Lots 22-24 - Indian IIL11n 1.397 Lake Shore ])rive Clermont, FI, 32711 .lanes Fluhart lots 25-26 Indian llLlls 1415 Lake Shore Drive Clermont, FL 32711 Margaret Mead Lot 8 - Indian IIilln 1425 Lake Shore Drive Clermont, FL 32711 Norwood Thompson Lot C - Indian lulls 1890 Lake Shore Drive Clermont, FL 32711 Drtcr-q,f It'N ulv, L-04- rnom "rhic /VvA7'AWs'r 4,11,1,69 e);l:1,p7' I MCI 1 4 A) 14,kl% SO b, J IV I JILOP C-,7-Y Or- CI"mo,0- A; Po&ar; dwa tp Tk %. p, b A, at I -A -Kr— COVA07/. -,-" ",-V- yLly.a.-N. 11wqt-gi5l J6 s liEol West Ughway 50, 133 Clormont, Florida, 32711 February 21, 1980 Mayor Clnudo Gmonlc: Due to rennone beyond my control and in the bent interest of all concerned, 2 hereby tender my resignation from the recreation. it has been a pleasure working for you and with the members of the committee. Respectfully submitted,_ Ra nd F. c en FOR ,,,.Vurl iuic.a 4utuldc ._ .,1Jiuu•- - OWNL'II: First Bapl•iat Church APPLICANT: Dan 11. Judy, Chnirman properties Committee PROPERTY; Lots 11 through 20 - Block 48 CATION: 720 Fifth Street and W. Montrone ZONING: R-3 REQUEST: The Church wishes to construct ❑ utility building of 208 square feet• in the rear yard of the Church, whereas the aouing ordinance only allows utility buildings of 100 square feet or less to be placed in the required rear yard of a building. COMMENTS: Section 26-48 of the Zoning Ordinance states that a single utility building of 100 square feet or less, and no more than 7 feet• in height may be located in the rear yard. Such a building must also be at least thirty (30) inches from the property line. Respectfully, George D. Forbes City Manager GDF:pm ❑ EASE E=_PRINT OR TYPE TO THE ZONING BOARD OF AD4 TENT ( OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA APPLICANT NAME: First Baptist Church ADDRESS: 720 Fifth St. Gentlemen: Having posted the necessary $25.00 appeal fee with the City Clerk, I hereby make application to your Board for relief from a decision of the Building Official of the City I of Clermont, whereby I was refused permission to: Repair ( ), Add to ( ), Alter ( ), Construct ( X), Move and Place ( ), a (sign) building on lot/s 11 throumh 20 , Block 48 �I Subdivision City Blocks , Address 720 Fifth street ,Zone R-3 Section of Code 26-48 Yards - A - in the City of Clermont, Florida. 1 The reason given by the Building Official for the decision in refusing to issue a building permit is: { Utility buildings permitted is 100 squnre feet with 30 inch side yards permitted. Proposed building 13'4" x 16 = 208 square feet or 108 s.f. oversized. My appeal to your Board is based on my contention that this decision creates a - - hardship on me for the following reason, or reasons: Because of the location, of trees on the property and because of the limitations the current setback requirements would put on the parking usage of the property. Seven (7) copies of all necessary floor plans, plot plans, and other pertinent infor- mation are attached hereto, on paper size 8�" x 14" minimum size. I submit that I qualify for this variance because I have an exceptional and unique i hardship on my particular parcel of land that is not shared by property owners in my area. A strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives me of the reasonable use of my land and the granting of this variance will not alter the essential character of the area. I have been notified that this Variance Application must be filed with the City Clerk no later than 5:00 P.M. on Friday, two (2) weeks prior, to the Council meeting at which time Variance will be considered. I also understand that when any variance is granted, construction of the structure must be completed within one year from date of grant. Date: Very truly yours, (wWca P,a�ev <r s Cami.l e 5/17/77 LCCAI. NOTICE Pursuant to Stato Law notice in hereby given that the City Council of the City of Clermont, sitting as a Board of Adjustment, will hold a Public Hearing In the Council Chambers located on the corner of West Avenue and Desoto Street on Tuesday, February 26, 1980 at approximately 7:30 p.m. to consider the following: A request by First Baptist Church for it Variance to Section 26-48 (Yards -A-) of the Zoning Ordinance in order to construct a Utility Building, 13'4" x 16' which in 208 square feet on the property described as: Lota 11 through 20 City Block 48 ---- First Baptist Church 720 Fifth Street this would be in excess of 108 square feet over tlw usual 100 square feet permitted for utility building". All interested parties will be given an opportunity to express their views on the matter. George D. Forbes, City Manager City of Clermont, Florida February 21, 1980 r i V.irnt Bnptist Church 720 Fifth Stroot, Clormont, Ill. VAR IAWCI_� _ _IIF,(�lAit; P Ad.jacunt Property Ownere wLthl.n 1.50 foot of property of Church. B11.1y M. Middlubroolcs 632 We.l.lenloy Drive Ilosnton, 'I'exnn 77024 Ronald Rowe P. 0. Box 525 Clermont, PI, Lloyd IL Bollelc 444 Id. Montrose St. P. 0. Box 532 Clermont, FL S. II. Sanger P. 0. Box 152 Clermont, FL 14. W. Fowler 470 W. DeSoto St. - Clermont, FL C. W. Brooke 429 W. Montrose St. Clermont, FL Marilyn George 444 W. DeSoto Clermont, FL February 12, 1980 Lots 1.4-16-111-20 - Block 49 Lots 10-1.2 - Block 49 Lots 8-10 - Block 49 So. 12 16-18-20 - Block 48 So. 1p Lots 12-14 - Block 48 Lots 5-7 - Block 48 Lots 8-10 - Block 48