08-09-1983 Supporting DocumentsCITY 0! CLFRdlONT
MINUTES
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
August 9, 1.983
A Regular Meeting of the City Council of: the City of Clermont was held
Tuesday, August 9, 1983 in the Council Chambers. The Meeting was called
to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Beals with the following Council Members
in attendance: Mayor Pro Tom Pool, Council. Member T.'urville, Council
Member Cole, and Council Member Dupee. Other City Officials present
were: City Manager Forbes, City Attorney Baird, Finance Director
Saunders, and Deputy City Clerk Brandt.
The Invocation was offered by City Manager Forbes, followed by the
repeating of the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag by all present.
MINUTES
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting held July 26, 1983, the Workshop
Meeting held July 27, 1983, and the Workshop Meeting held August
4, 1983 were approved as presented.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
City Manager Forbes reported that the East Central Florida Regional
Planning Council was forming a Tax Study Advisory Committee to study
the impact of Proposition 1 on local government, and had asked for
nominations to the Committee. Mr. Forbes made a recommendation to
nominate Finance Director Saunders as the City of Clermont's repre-
sentative to serve on the Tax Study Advisory Committee. It was the
consensus of the Council to have Mr. Saunders serve in that capacity.
SBA GRANT FOR LANDSCAPING
It was reported that a small Business Administration (SBA) Grant
for $3,500 was available to the City. The grant would allow the City
to rehabilitate and develop its parks, recreational areas, and other
publicly owned lands. Mr. Forbes stated that the money would be used
to purchase trees and shrubs for City owned property, and Mr. Bob
Smythe, with assistance from the Clermont Garden Club, and Parks and
Recreation Board, would oversee the project. Mr. Forbes stated that
if there were no problems with this, he would like to execute the
agreement with the County for the grant money. It was discussed that
some larger trees should be planted, and the landscaping of the well
83-125 site on Minnehaha should be completed. A^MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCIL
nTrMnfI RT.V CARRIED
RADIO SYSTEM REFLECTOR
City Manager Forbes reported that as outlined in his memo to the
Council, if there were no objections, he would like to take $176.30
from Contingencies to purchase and install a reflector on our radio
system to help curtail our transmission interference in Volusia County.
It was the consensus of the Council to purchase and install the device
at a cost of $176.30 with funds from Contingencies.
JAYCEE BEACH BOAT RAMP IMPROVEMENTS
It was reported that the County had completed improvements to the Jaycee
Beach Boat Ramp and billed the City $3,313 for its share of the work.
Also, ten shuffleboard courts at Kehler Park will be repainted at a cost
of $3,000. As discussed during the August 2, 1983 Workshop, both payments
would be made from the Recreation Capital Outlay Account. After some
discussion, it was the consensus of the Council to pay both amounts, with
funds coming from the Recreation Capital Outlay Account.
CENTER LAKE WEED CONTROL
Pursuant to the August 4, 1983 Workshop Meeting at Center Lake, City
Manager Forbes stated that if there were no Council objections, he would .
CITY OR ChPRAIONT 0
MINUTES
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
August 9, 1,983
Page 2
like to hire a company to mow the. cattails and harvest the floating
woods in Center Lake. Council Member Turvillo stated that it was his
understanding that the torpedo grass near the shorol.ino would not be
cut, and explained that shorelino vegetation such as cattails and
torpedo grans were beneficial because they lowered the nutrient level
of the lake naturally. Mr. Forbes stated that he knew of only one
company in Lake County that did this kind of work. However, an ad
would be placed in the Orlando Sentinel asking for bids on the work.
After some discussion, it was the consensus of the Council to proceed
with the bids for the work at Center Lake.
RUFUS SULLIVAN REQUEST PERMISSION TO CUT CATTAILS
It was reported that a letter had been received from Mr. Rufus Sullivan
asking permission to cut cattails on East Lake
swhich
iobsne truct
the
eimming wview
in front of his property. The City policy
on as
reviewed, and it was discussed that if permission were granted, Mr.
Sullivan could not pull the cattails out by the roots. After some
discussion, it was the consensus of the Council to have Mr. Forbes
send Mr. Sullivan a .letter outlining the City's policy on shoreline
vegetation and granting permission to trim (not pull out by the roots)
cattails in front of his property on East Lake.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
HOOKS ROAD EASEMENT AND CONDEMNATION
City Attorney Baird referred to a letter he had sent to the Council re-
garding his negotiations with Mrs. Marilyn Langley for an easement on
her property on Hooks Road and the condemnation proceedings against her
property on Lakeshore Drive. He stated that the following settlement
had been tentatively reached: (1) Mrs. Langley would allow the City
to burn down the home on Lakeshore Drive as a training drill, (2)
she would convey an easement to the City along Hooks Road, and (3)
the City would pay Mrs. Langley $1,000 compensation for the easement.
Mr. Baird asked Council permission to proceed with this settlement.
83-126 After some discussion, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER TURVILLE,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER POOL, AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIEDTFORTCITYmm�D
COUNCIL MEMBER DUPEE'S REPORT
Council Member Dupee stated that the Lake Water Authority was proposing
to raise its millage from .04 to .50 mills. The increased millage was
needed to raise one million dollars to build two water control structures
She stated that this was a large increase, and the City should keep care-
ful watch on the Agency's budget hearings.
COUNCIL MEMBER POOL'S REPORT
Council Member Pool reported that at the corner of Chestnut and West
Streets a tree overhangs the south side of the road and obstructs vision
to the west.
VISITORS WITH BUSINESS
RESOLUTION NO. 440 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 770 WEST MONTROSE STREET
Mayor Beals reported that Mr. and Mrs. Richard Barton had requested a
CUP to operate a custom cabinetmaking/woodworking shop at 770 West
Montrose Street. Manufacturing is a conditional use in general com-
mercial zone, provided that such business employees fewer than five
persons and is incidental and complimentary to and in conjunction
with a retail business or service. On August 2, 1983 the Planning
and Zoning Commission recommended that the CUP be granted, subject
to the nine conditions listed in Resolution No. 440.
® CITY OP CLRRAIONT
MINUTES
REGULAR COUNCIL MRE'TING
August 9, 1903
Page 3
Mr. Barton stated that the front part of the building would be used
as a showroom for the retail salon of their. products. The remainder
would be used for the manufacturing operations.
Mayor Beals asked for any comments from those present in the audience,
and no one spoke for or against the proposed CUP. After some dis-
83-127 cussion, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER POOL, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
__._....- .... .,.... — — ........o -- nnn n"1 nnen-
RESOLUTION NO. 441-CONDITI014AL USE PERMIT FOR 450 WEST MONTROSE
It was reported that the First Baptist Church had requested a CUP to
use a building at 450 West Montrose for classrooms and grass parking.
Churches are a Conditional Use in Residential Zones. Mayor Beals
stated that the Planning and Zoning Comission at its August 2, 1983
Meeting had recommended granting the CUP on the condition that the
house be brought up to code if it is to be used for classrooms.
Mayor Beals asked for comments from those present in the audience,
and no one spoke for or against the proposed CUP. City Manager
Forbes stated that the topography of the lot requires that the
driveway be paved before grass parking can be permitted. Council
Member Turville reiterated that the building could not be used
for classrooms until it met City fire and building codes. He also
asked if the property would be used mainly for Sunday parking, and
City Manager Forbes stated that this was the intention of the Church.
83-128 After some discussion, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER POOL,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER COLE, AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED BY ROLL CALI
THE
REQUEST FOR VARIANCE - 2248 SOUTH LAKESHORE DRIVE
On behalf of his mother, Mr. Bob Thompson again appeared before the
Council to request a rear yard setback variance to construct a dining -
room addition to her home. The request had been tabled at the July,
26, 1983 Council Meeting to allow Mr. Thompson time to gather more
information. Mr. Thompson stated the this property was annexed into
the City in February of 1972 and the hardship was that the lot was
only 105' deep from the street to the present seawall, and the existing
structure is approximately 23' from the seawall. He stated that in
order to build the addition, he needed an eight foot rear yard variance.
After much discussion regarding setback requirements, rear yard setback
83-129 requirements for lake property, and annexation of property, A MOTION WAS
MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER POOL AND SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER COLE TO GRANT
VARIANCE REQUEST FOR 954 WEST MONTROSE
Mayor Beals reported that Mr. David Cosson had requested a side yard
variance from the required 73�' to 6" in order to create a carport from
an existing slab. The slab is 6" from the side property line. A letter
from Mr. Cosson's neighbors was passed out which stated that they ap_
83-130 proved of his request. After some discussion, A MOTION WAS MADE BY
coNNCii. MEMBER COLE, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER TURVILLE, AND UNANIMOUS-
® CITY or CLRRdIONr
MINUTES
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
August 9, 1.903
Page 4
OLD BUSINESS
FINAL READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 155-M, ANNEXATION
Mayor Beals explained that if adopted, this ordinance would annex
approximately 95 acres of land located north of Highway 50 and cast
of Grand Highway. The original request has been reduced by about
16 acres to avoid the creation of an enclave.
Mayor Beals asked for comments from those present in the audience,
and no one spoke for or against the annexation.
83-131 After some discussion, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER DUPES,
COUNCIL MEMBER COLE AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED DY ROLL CALL VOTE TO
ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 155-M , ANNEXING APPROXIMATELY 95 ACRES OF
LAND NORTH OF HIGHWAY 50 AND EAST OF GRAND HIGHWAY BELONGING TO
DOD WADE VOTING WAS AS FOLLOWS: COUNCIL MEMBER POOL, AYE:
COUNCIL MEMBER DUPES, AYE; COUNCIL MEMBER COLS, AYE; COUNCIL
MEMBER TURVILLE, AYE• AND MAYOR DEALS, AYE. THE ORDINANCD WAS
READ BY TITLE ONLY.
Mayor Beals stated that he felt that this annexation was a very
positive and progressive step for the City of Clermont, and that
he would like to have property south of the City annexed because
the future of Clermont is to the south. He stated that he would
like to have the City Manager write property owners to the south
of the City and ask them if they interested in annexation. After
some discussion, it was the consensus of the Council to have Mr.
Forbes do this.
CLERMONT HOTEL
Mayor Beals stated that he wanted the Clermont Hotel to appear on the
agenda of the first meeting in September because the next court hearing
on this matter will be August 30, 1983.
In discussing the progress of the court hearings and the proposal made
by the former owners of the hotel, Council Member Turville expressed his
concern that the bankruptcy court judge will rule in favor of bringing
the hotel up to code and would not allow an asset to be torn down which
is the route being pursued by the City. The City will spend more and
more money, and in the end won't be able to tear the building down.
Mr. Turville stated that he would like to know just how strong our case
is for razing the building.
Mr. Cecil Eaton appeared and expressed his continued concern that some
vagrant will start a fire in the hotel and burn his home down with it.
He also stated that the same people are taken from the hotel repeatedly
by the police and asked why he couldn't sign a complaint for their
arrest.
City Manager Forbes stated that he would talk to Chief Tyndal and find
out what procedure to follow to keep the same vagrants from coming back
to the hotel building and report back to the Council.
NEW BUSINESS
CLERMONT CENTENNIAL COMMITTEE - REQUEST FOR FUNDS
It was reported that the Centennial Committee had requested $500 to
83-132 purchase photographic materials. After some discussion, A MOTION WAS
MADE BY COUNCIL MBER POOL, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER TURVILLE, AND
�. rooTnnEMmn (RANT THE REOUEST FOR $500 WITH PAYMENT COMING
® CITY OF CLRRAIONT
MINUTES
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
August 9, 1983
Page 5
RESOLUTION NO. 442 - POLICY ON INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BONDS
City Manager Forbes explained that pursuant to Council direction, he had
written a Policy on the issuance of industrial development bonds to use
as a guideline for the City.
Council Member Pool stated that he questioned the fourth item of the
policy, questioning whether a lower limit should be placed on the value
of a project. City Manager Forbes stated that the intent of the
"threshold" requirement was to limit small projects. however, this item
could be removed from the policy if so desired.
Council Member Turville stated that he had trouble with getting involved
with these bonds, and wondered about the effects on private business al-
ready operating in Clermont when issuing them. City Manager Forbes
stated that he believed items numbered three and twelve adequately ad-
dressed this issue.
83-133
RESOLUTION NO. 443 - UTILITY FUND BUDGET
It was explained that this Resolution would establish the Utility Fund
Budget of the City for FY1983-1984. The Resolution is necessary because
the City's Bond Ordinance requires the adoption of this budget 45 days
prior to the end of the fiscal year. The Utility Fund Budget will be
readopted according to procedures outlined in the Trim Bill. After some
83-139 discussion, A MOTION WAS MADE ^BY^COUNCIL MEMBER POOL, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
0 onr.r. rnr.r. vnTF. TO ADOPT RESOLUTION
The Meeting adjourned at 9:15.
CH 4S1. BEALS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
AY 1 SAUNDERS, CITY CLERK
® CITY OF CLUMONT
MINUTES
WORKSHOP MEETING
August 3, 1983
A Workshop Meeting of the City Council of the City of. Clermont was hold
Wednesday, August 3, 1983 in the City Hall Conference Room. The Meeting
was called to order at 7:10 p.m. by Mayor Beals with the following
Council. Members in attendance: Mayor Pro Tom Pool., Council. Member Cole,
Council Member Turvil.le, and Council Member Dupee. other City Officials
present were: City Manager Forbes and Finance Director Saunders.
CENTENNIAL COMMITTEE
Dick Stokes and Bonnie Homan were present to explain the Committee's
$10,000 budget request. They distributed a letter to the Council
dated August A, 1983 which explained the request in detail. Many
questions were asked about the income producing events, non income
producing costs, and the total revenues and expenditures projected
by the Committee. Mr. Stokes explained that the single biggest
cost was a book being printed on the History of Clermont which was
being financed by private funds. Mayor Beals informed the Council
that lie is involved in the ad specialities business, but that he
will not be supplying any of the materials for the Centennial
The Committee Members also explained that while many individual
organizations would be involved with the Centennial, all profits
from the Centennial would be returned to the City and donated for
recreational purposes. Bonnie Homan explained that the Centennial
would be held from March 31 through April 6th, and she gave a run
down of all of the planned events. She also invited the Council
Members to attend the Centennial Committee Meetings which are held
on the fourth Thursday of every month.
The finances of the Committee were discussed and it was explained
that there would be a drawdown of City monies and that the Treasurer -=
of the Centennial Committee should meet with the City Finance Director
to learn how City monies would be obtained. Basically a bill must
be submitted for all disbursements and the Finance Director will
maintain a separate account for this event. The Council Members
thanked the Centennial Committee for their extra effort in pro-
viding a detailed budget. They believed that the new budget was
much more enlightening, and even if their projected revenues fell
short, the City should still do well with the Centennial Committee
events. it was the consensus of the Council to place $10,000 in
the proposed budget for the Centennial Committee. Finance Director
Saunders was instructed to meet with Frances Oswalt of the Centen-
nial Committee regarding the budget.
REPORTS
Council Member Turville asked many questions regarding the City's
water system. The City Manager was directed to get in contact
with the State and insure that none of the city's wells were being
subjected to degradation as evidenced in the paper by some abutting
communities.
The City Manager was also directed to contact the school system and
determine the outcome of the lights the City requested for the ele-
mentary school.
The Council briefly discussed a letter from the Harry -Anna Crippled
Children's Hospital asking that benches with outdoor advertising
on them be placed in the City, the proceeds from the advertising
would go to the hospital. It was the consensus of the Council that
the Children's Hospital is a fine and greatly needed facility, how-
ever, this action would set a bad precedent for the City. City
Manager Forbes was directed to send a letter informing the hospital
that it would not be possible for the City to participate in this
project. It was suggested that the hospital might contact the golf
courses in the area to see if they might be interested in obtaining
benches.
® CITY 0P CLRRHONT
MINUTES
WORKSHOP MEETING
August- 3, 1.903
Page 2
The City Manager passed out a letter from the City Attorney regarding
oad
an casementt le Litt"codsDr.ivioUokltand
lt
Hostatedthat hele nwoulpropertygley ddiscuss on
this matter with the Council at next 'Tuesday's Council Meeting.
The City Manager explained the status of the City's water tank. Uni-
ins oction revealed deficiencies, mainly flaking
versal Tank and Ironworks has not yet completed work on the tank since
the one year warranty p Engineer has been in con -
paint on the interior of the tank. The City Eng
tact with this company letteri�hadas now
beenfiled
filed wChapter
thelbondingrefinancing.
company
To protect the City, recment is not worked out soon, the City
Will
explaining that if an ag
be obtaining funds from the bonding company to complete the work.
REPLACEMENT FIRE TRUCK
he Fire
Thacecitymentfi.1 truckatan1request estimatedfrom costtof $125,OOOatotn$300ent t000or a re -
The City Manager explained that the purpose of this truck was to re-
place the 1952 Seagraves Ladder Truck with a newer vehicle having
better fire supression capabilities; including if a new aerial ladder,
snorkel or telesquirt. Iie explained that even
elladders andtrade-
Muchpurchased, the City would probably keep
in the 1952 Seagraves Truck. Much discussion ensued regarding the
age and 's four
re
explained thatlon of the me t costyeffecti.ve1wayvtolreplaceTa fire cityvehicHer
might be to purchase a used truck from a larger fire e departat a ment. He
reminded the Council Members that about one year ago,
n regarding bidding on a used fire
Meeting, there was much discussio
the Fire Department were discussed in great
truck. The needs of
of the Council was that $50,000 be trans -
detail, and the consensus acement Fund to assist in financing depre-
ferred to the Capital Replreview the status of
cles
ciation. The City would againearbut lno new efire ltruck
at the budget sessions for the next fiscal y
would be purchased this fiscal year.
STREET SWEEPER
The purchase of a new street sweeper was discussed in great detail by
the Council. The City Manager explained that basically the City had
three options on this matter: (1) Not purchase a street sweeper at
all, (2) Purchase amechanical sweepretsweepeas(wereudiscussed, vacuum type
aswasthe
sweeper. Different type
public's response to the questionnaire. All Council Members agreed that
the public's response was for the City to obtain a new street sweeper.
It was theconsensus
in the Citnciittcuum
wouldat hbeemore acost effectivesweeper to
do
a sightly y'
purchase a mechanical sweeper. It was requested that $5y,000 for the
replacement mechanical street sweeper be placed in this year's budget.
RELOCATION OF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
to
pend a
city thousand dollars Forbes theoenddofhtheonextlfiscalsyearrutotlooksinto the
ew
possibility of relocating the City's Public Works Facility. He ex-
plained thathe
best
siteplace
onceftheor aspra(fieldnew lwas ty mrelocated. Theight be the se con -
Utility Departmentto the discretion of
sensus of the Council was that it would be up
the
epCity
Manager to use Council posted onnthisds nmatterthe udget for such a study, and
the
PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS
and Recreation projects. The
The Council discussed in detail Parks
e in today for
Finance Director explained that a bill had just com
® CITY OP CLPRAIONT
MINUTES
Workshop Meeti.tig
August 3, 1903
Page 3
the City to pay its share of the boat ramp improvements at Jaycee
Beach in the amount of: about $3,313. The City Manager i.nformod
the Council that the Recreation Club also requested that ton of
their ed
approximately b$3,.000. lie ts `explained tthat nthe o$7,,000dinta cost of
capital
Improvements for Parks and Recreation was originally budgeted for
handball courts. It was the consensus of the Council that since
handball courts were being built in the City, new courts would not
be necessary. The Council Members stated that they had no problem
if the City would spend the $3,000 in its existing account to paint
the Recreation Club's oard
r a
ow car for
the Building Department hwould bcourts. Funds
come fromthecity'son cash reserves.
Council Member Pool stated that he felt it was disgraceful that the
City did not have a swimming pool. All of the cities in the north
half of the county have pools, and that Clermont should have one.
A fund drive should begin to assist the City or schools in build -
a swimming pool. He believed that swimming lessons and swim teams
should be taught from a swimming pool. Mr. Pool also brought up
the possibility of adding lawn bowling to our facilities at Kehler
Parks. The City Manager explained that horseshoe courts had recently
been added at Kehler Park, and there was not much room for additional
improvements.
He further stated that Council Members could assist with Senior
Citizen activities by finding citizens wishing to serve on an
advisory committee for the Senior Citizens Center.
The Meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
Charles B. IIeals, Mayor
Att+w.ySlaLunders
est:
, City Clerk
® CITY OF CI PRAIONT
MINUTES
REVENUE SHARING PROPOSED USE [TEARING
Tuesday, July 16, 3.983
A Federal Revenue Sharing Proposed Use ❑earing was held on
Tuesday, July 16, 1983 at 5:00 P.M. in the City Manager's
Office.
Those present were: City Manager Forbes and Finance
Director Saunders.
City Manager Forbes explained that this hearing is required
by Federal Revenue Sharing Regulations, and must be held
before the proposed budget is presented to the City Council
for enactment. The purpose is to give Clermont citizens
an opportunity to suggest uses for Federal Revenue Sharing
monies.
There being no citizen input, the meeting was adjourned at
5:10 P.M.
CITY OF CLERMONT
George D. Forbes, City Manager
ATTEST:
Wa a Saunders, City Clerk
0 CITY Of C1,0AIONT
MINUTES
WORKSHOP MEIi;TING
August 4, 1903
A Worskhop Mocting of the City Council of the City of Clermont was held
Thursday, August 4, 1903 at Center Lake. The meeting was called to
order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor Beals with the following Council Members in
attendance: Mayor Pro Tem Pool, Council Member Turville, and Council
Member Dupce. Other Officials present were: City Manager George Forbes,
James Modica from the Saint Johns Water Management District, and Eric
Coppenmeier from Lake County Aquatic Weed Control.
CENTER LAKE
Mayor Beals explained that the purpose of this meeting was to discuss
different solutions to aesthetically improve Center Lake in Clermont.
City Manager Forbes explained various alternatives for solving the weed
problem at Center Lake which have been discussed in the past. These are:
1. Draw down the lake to expose the muck. When thoroughly dry, a
bulldozer would scrape the lake bottom, and the muck would be
hauled to another site. This alternative has been rejected
because there is no convenient place to send the water being
drained from the lake, and in addition, this operation would be
very expensive.
2. Aeration has been discussed because it improves the circulation
of air throughout the lake and helps to breakdown organic materials.
It is particularly good for breaking down organic materials, but
is not of much use for inorganic materials. In addition, since the
lake is relatively shallow, it does not appear to have any aeration
problems; and aeration has been ruled out as a solution.
3. Grass Carp have been considered, however, the representative from
the Lake County Aquatic Weed Control stated that the City could
no longer obtain permits for the fish. It was believed that some
Grass Carp in the lake would help by eating the floating vegetation.
4. It was explained that many years ago a dragline had been used on
the lake and it had proven to be very beneficial for cleaning the
shoreline. However, a dragline would totally destroy all vegetation
along the shoreline.
Jim Modica of the Saint Johns Water Management District explained the benefits
of shoreline vegetation to the Council. The vegetation is actually good for
the lake, and even the cattails reduce nutrients and assist greatly with water
quality. He stated that he believed the water quality of the lake was fairly
good, largely because of the vegetation. He discussed that mowing the vegeta-
tion instead of pulling it out by the roots would also be beneficial for
good water quality.
5. The use of chemicals to control floating vegetation was discussed
in detail. The Council believed this was an expensive alterna-
tive if contracted out, since a one year program of control costs
about $2,000. Eric Coppenmeier discussed the problem, and stated
a chemical that the City already has on hand (Sonar) could be
approved for this use. Upon further discussion, it was decided
not to consider this alternative because the use of chemicals is
short term and would have to be repeated yearly, and at times
the lake is pumped into other water bodies.
® CITY OF CURMONT
MINUTES
6. The use of an aquatic mowing machine on the lake was discussed in
detail. This machine seems to overcome most of the objections to the
alternatives listed above because it would simply be harvesting the
weeds along the shoreline. It was the consensus of the Council that
the mowing of the cattails would be a sound idea, but that the City
should also do something about removing some of the ducks from the
lake. Each duck adds a tremendous amount of pollutants to the water,
equivalent to three times as much as one person. In other words, one
duck excretes coliform bacteria equal to three human beings.
It was the consensus of the Council to have the City Manager obtain bids
for the use of an aquatic mowing machine to clear weeds from Center Lake,
and present the information at a future Council Meeting.
The meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. 4e", A �3 11-X
Charles B. Beals, Mayor
Attest:
__ Wayne�Saunders, City Clerk _ -
® CITY OP CLRRdIONT
MINUTES
Workshop Meeting
July 27, 1983
The Workshop Meeting of the City Council of. the City of Clermont was
held July 27, 1983 in the City Hall Conference Room. The meeting was
called to order. at 7:10 p.m. by Mayor Beals with the following Council
Members in attendance: Council Member Turville, Council Member Dupee,
and Council Member Cole. Council Member Pool was absent. Other City
Offi.cials present were City Manager. Forbes and Finance Director Saunders.
CI1'Y MANAGER'S RL'POITP
The City Manager gave a report on the bowling alley at Westgate Plaza.
lie explained to the Council Members that they would be seeing a third hand-
ball court constructed, as a court could be legally built on the north
side of the building. It reminded the Council that a variance had been
given for the construction of handball courts and a weight room on the
south side of the building, mainly to save parking spaces. lie explained
the four spaces would bethe now handball uadded rt uat thld ewest yside rof thenbuilding, so noer,
spaces would be lost.
The City Manager spoke to the Council Members about Jenkins Auditorium
and explained many of the City's problems with the various groups in
the building. He stated that he would be talking with representatives
from the Highland Squares and hilltop Stompers about any potential prob-
lems with scheduling and floor maintenance.
The City Manager informed the Council that for many years the City has
leased its bucket truck at a rate of $45/hr. to various organizations.
He stated that the City does lease the truck, but that a City open
ator
must be hired along with the vehicle. lie explained that he would re-
search the cost per hour to insure that it was covering all of the
City's costs. The Council Members believed that there were no prob-
lems with leasing the bucket truck since it had been done for many years,
but they wished to be kept informed if there were any problems.
The status of the problems with the weeds at Center Lake was discussed.
The Council set a Workshop for next Thursday at 6:00 p.m. at the lake
to decide what alternative the City should select to clean up the lake.
The status of the City's new policy on boat docks on City property was
considered. The City Manager stated that to his knowledge, there was
only one dock on City property at this time, and that the lessee of thisted
property was not complying with the lease agreement. Mr. Forbes sta
that he would keep the Council informed on this matter, but that this
dock may have to be torn down.
BUDGET WORKSHOP
Finance Director Saunders informed the Council that we may have to change
the date for our tentative budget hearing. He was informed today, that
the School Board may select September 6, 1983 for their tentative budget
hearing. He explained that the State Law requires that the City's budget
hearings not conflict with the School Board's and County's as much as pos-
sible. It was the consensus of the Council that should the city's hearing
conflict with either of those mentioned above, the City would reschedule
our tentative budget hearing for September 7, 1983, at 7:30 p.m.
Finance Director Saunders reviewed questions raised at the last budget
workshop with the Council Members. He explained that he had talked with
Chief Tyndal about the monies budgeted for cameras for the Police Depart-
ment, and stated that the Police Department had thoroughly researched the
type of cameras they were purchasing and would be satisfied with the funds
budgeted.
® CITY OP Cure,IIONT
MINUTES
Workshop Meeting
July 27, 1983
Page 2
City Manager L'orbes discussed the $4,480 budgeted for Ixiinting of: fire
hydrants. He explained that this money was not just for paint, but also
for hiring a part-time worker to perform the work. There was much dis-
cussion on the amount of funds budgeted by the Utility Department for
the work, and it was the consensus of the Council to reduce this item to
$4,000.
There was much discussion regarding vehicle replacement and the City's
Vehicle Replacement Plan. A worksheet with a list of all of the City's
vehicles was handed out to all Council Members. Council Member Tur-
ville discussed the fact that he believed that just because a car was
old did not necessarily mean that it should be traded. lie stated that
any car traded should be backed up not just by the age and milage, but
also the condition of the body and history of repairs. He stated that
with the rising prices of automobiles depreciation was the largest cost
to be borne when purchasing a vehicle. As long as there were no main-
tenance problems and the body was in good shape, it would probably be
worth keeping a vehicle. City Manager Forbes stated that he had no
problems with this philosophy as long as the Council understood that
the City's fleet must be kept in good condition. If we are to keep any
kind of maintenance program, and considering the large number of City
owned vehicles, a certain amount must be replaced every year. Ile
explained that the Police Department gets new cars every other year,
since they have approximately 100,000 miles on them when they are
traded, and have been subjected to extremely hard use. He stated that
in the year the Police Department is not getting a car, it is important
that the City consider the purchase of at least two vehicles to keep
the fleet in decent shape. The Council should consider replacing those
vehicles which are in the worst shape (highest mileage, maintenance
costs, and poorest body condition).
The Council Members reviewed each type of City vehicle - passenger cars,
patrol cars, trucks, fire vehicles, heavy equipment, garbage trucks,
and tractors. The City Manager explained that in the past few years the
City has reduced the size of its fleet by several vehicles. The Council
discussed the replacement of a 1973 Ford Courier and the Cushman with a
19B3 four cylinder pickup truck. After much discussion, it was the con-
sensus of the Council that the funds for this vehicle be kept in the
budget, however, it would not be replaced until specific authority to do
so is given by the Council, and that the new vehicle not be purchased
until the sprayfield is in operation. At that time, the needs of the
Utility Department can be better assessed. The Council felt that be-
cause the 1973 Ford Courier is fully depreciated and in good working
order, that it might be well to keep the vehicle. The replacement
of the Building Official's car was discussed in great detail. The car
was previously used by the Police Department and has very high mileage.
Replacement of the Public Works Director's car was also discussed.
After much discussion, it was the consensus of the Council to replace
the Building Official's car this fiscal year, and would most likely be
a used 1982 model which will be bid out by the City. The 1981 Ford
Fairmont with very high mileage used by the Police Department as a
spare vehicle would be traded in next year's budget. This vehicle
would be replaced by the car presently driven by Chief Tyndal, and
he would receive a new police vehicle. The funds for the Building
Official's car would be obtained by a budget amendment. The $7,000
dollars for handball courts would be eliminated, and the funds used
for the Building Official's car. The Council believed that the
handball courts were no longer needed because three courts were now
being constructed next to City Hall at the bowling alley.
The sanitation vehicles owned by the City were discussed in detail,
and their maintenance records reviewed. The City Manager stated
that $55,000 was presently in this year's budget for the purchase
of a replacement garbage truck. He stated that the City has three
garbage trucks, two are used for garbage collection and the third
truck is used for trash collection and as a spare. He stated that
® CITY OP CLRRdIONT
MINUTES
Workshop Meeting
July 27, 1903
Page 3
what the City Staff had initially recomonended was to trade in a
1974 Pord Packer with approximately 80,0000 miles. The City's 1978
garbage truck would be used for trash pick up. A new 1983 vehicle
would then be purchased for garbage collection. He stated that
the City had some reservations in trading the Packer on the 1974
Pord truck since the hopper was very large and the collection person-
nel did not wish to trade in the packer. A new trash collection
vehicle can be divided into two parts, the chasis and the packer. The
City Manager explained that they could get two vehicles in good shape
for a price less than one new vehicle by following the Public Works
Director's recommendations that the City would purchase a new chasis
with cab and engine for the 1978 ford (vehicle #4224). A diesel engine
would be purchased for better fuel consumption and engine life, and the
existing packer would be placed on this chasis. The 1978 Pord chasis,
would then be placed on vehicle #4217 and the chasis for the 1974 cord
trash truck would be traded. The existing twenty yard packer would
then be placed on the 1978 cord chasis for trash collection. In this
manner the entire sanitation fleet would be kept in very good shape at
cost less than the purchase price of a new vehicle. The estimated cost
for this work including painting and sane maintenance was $47,000. It
was the consensus of the Council to purchase a new chasis and accept
the changes as recommended by the City Staff.
Mayor Beals explained that there was a meeting of the Centennial Com-
mittee tomorrow night and that they had been inquiring about the amount
of funds they would receive from the City. He then asked the Council if
they would briefly consider the Committee's budget request for $10,000.
After much discussion of the City's financial status, it was the con-
sensus of the Council that about $6,000 be budgeted for the Centennial
Committee. Council Member Dupes stated that $500 would be needed
immediately for part of the Committee's work. She requested that the
City Manager put the request for the $500 on the next Council Agenda.
The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
CHARLES B. BEALS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
1111YFJ
SAUNDERS, CITY CLERK
MEMORANDUM
To: City Council
From: City Manager
Subject: July 26, 1983 Meeting
Date: July 22, 1983
The following items are on the agenda for next Tuesday's Council
meeting:
VISITORS WITH BUSINESS
REQUEST FOR ZONING VARIANCE. Mrs. Thompson has requested a var-
iance from the rear yard requirements of the Zoning Ordinance in
order to construct a dining room addition to her home. This
addition would encroach on the required rear yard setback of
twenty-five (25) feet by six (6) feet. Please review the enclosed
site plan and memo on this matter.
REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FROM THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. We have
received a request from Chyrel Y. Boney for a lot width variance
from the Subdivision Ordinance for property she owns on Anderson
Street south of DeSoto Street. She wishes to plat three lots- - ----
with a lot width of 73.33 feet whereas a lot width of 74 feet is
required. Since each lot would have an area of at least 20,000
square feet she believes that this variance is justified. Please
review the enclosed site plan and memo on this request.
RESOLUTION NO. 439 REQUEO ST FR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BONDS.
This Resolution would allow the City to issue Industrial Develop-
ment Bonds (IDBs) for the Lake Highlands nursing home. Enclosed
are materials from Mr. Rogers explaining the request in detail.
Mr. Rogers wishes to issue bonds in an amount not to exceed
$2,900,000.00 at an interest rate that is 23% under prime with a
15 year payback period. Barnett Bank has agreed to purchase the
bonds.
IDBs are revenue bonds in which only the revenues obtained from
the operation of the Nursing Home would be pledged to pay back
the bonds. These bonds are issued by many cities to obtain funds
for a private company that a municipality believes would benefit
the City.
In order to issue these bonds, in most cases the Citv retains title to the
property financed, but enters into a long-term lease or sales
contract with the user company. At the end of the contract per-
iod the title to the property then transfers back to the company.
The sale of these bonds by a municipality then qualifies the
bonds for their tax-exempt status, while the earning power and
credit standing of the user company make the bonds attractive to
investors.
July 22, 1983
Page two
in theory, three parties benefit from IDBs as follows:
1. The City, since they are attracting a new business or
expansion of an existing business that they deem de-
sirable, as well as the benefits of new jobs, etc.
2. The business benefits by receiving lower financing
costs through tax exempt bonds and the fact that usually the
facility being built is technically owned by the City.
The result is a number of tax benefits, the most obvi-
ous being exempt from ad valorem taxes. however, soma
communitiesrequire the firm to pay the municipality
a yearly fee approximately equal to the entire ad valor -
um tax.
3. The third group to benefit is the investors who are able
to obtain the tax advantages of these bonds as an in-
vestment.
The following items should be considered by the Council before
IDBs are issued.
1. Does the City desire to have the particular industry
in the City? Some communities are more interested in
financing new industries or industries that are willing
to locate in redevelopment areas. The Council may wish
to set standards for the issuance of these bonds.
2. What is the financial capability of the user company?
These are still City issued bonds. If the company
should default on the bonds, it would affect the public's
perception of the City, even though we_would not be
required to pay back the bonds.
In other words the City Council should insure that they desire
the project and that the company will have the revenue from its
operation to pay back the bonds before the IDBs are issued.
IDB financing is one of a variety of incentives a local government
can use to induce business firms to locate or remain in its juris-
diction. however, in the past several years there has been quite
a bit of controversy surrounding these bonds because opponents
believe that IDB financing represents a federal subsidy. They
believe that the use of this subsidy for a private business
may place an existing business at a competitive disadvantage.
They also argue that IDB financing loses any justification for
tax exemption if it is used for a corporation that does not need
assistance to finance expansion, and in areas where commercial
credit is readily available. For these reasons the federal gov-
ernment has been considering further restriction of the use of
these bonds.
July 22, 3.983
Page three
Policies the city Council may wish to consider in crantin IDBs
nclude:
1. The City will not finance an IDB project except to induce
its location or expansion based on a demonstrated need
for the project. (Some cities will not approve these
bonds unless the projects arc in a redevelopment area or
industrial park.)
2. The project would not be economically feasible without
the availability of IDBs.
3. The City determines that there is a demonstrable need
for services provided by the project and that there will
be no substantial disruption of existing employment or
facilities of a similar nature in the Clermont area.
4. A financial capability report is obtained which clearly -
demonstrates that revenues from the company will be suf-
ficient to pay off the bonds.
5. The project will provide substantial employment and sub-
stantial capital investment for the City.
6. The City will require that a payment in lieu of taxes
equivalent to 100% of the assessed valuation tax levy be
contracted to both the County and the Cityt if applicable.
These are some policy suggestions you may wish to consider which
should also be reviewed by the City Attorney.
Enclosed is a short chapter on IDB financing giving more details
on these bonds. This material is from a book titled Capital
Financing Strategies for Local Governments.
OLD BUSINESS
AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY ON OLD LIBRARY BUILDING. Enclosed is the
proposed agreement with the County for the use of the old library
building. This agreement has been approved by the Board of County
Commissioners and would require the County to pay $100.00 per
month rent for this building. The term of the lease is for one
year, with an option to renew for a second year.
Formal Council approval of this agreement is required, and to
date I have received only one comment, and that one from Council
Member Dupee. She has recommended that item 3, "Terms of Lease",
be amended to require the County to give 90 instead of 30 days'
advance notice of their desire to exercise the option period.
COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICE WORKERS. You may recall that on Janu-
ary 11, 1983 the City Council authorized the use of Community
July 22, 1983
Page four
Service Workers from the County Probation Office for a period
of six months. Community Service Workers are first time DWI
offenders who have been assigned by the Court to complete a
Community Service project in lieu of time in jail. While we
have not yet used the program to its full potential in the last
six months, it has been helpful, and I would recommend that
Council continue to allow the City to participate in the program.
NEW BUSINESS
RESOLUTION NO. 437 LIBRARY GRANT. Enclosed is Resolution 437
which, if adopted, would allow the City to apply for a grant
through the State Library Services Construction Act to expand the
Cooper Memorial Library. The Library Board has recommended a
$100,000.00 addition to the library, of which $50,000.00 or 50%
would be paid for through a grant, and $50,000.00 with Library
Board funds.
Monies for the program have become available through the
Emergency Jobs Bill recently enacted by Congress.
RESOLUTION NO. 436 FINES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS. This resolution
would implement Ordinance 236-C adopted by the City Council sev-
eral months ago. The Resolution sets fines for parking violations
at $5.00 if paid within 36 hours, and $10.00 if paid after 36
hours. The amount of the fine is similar to that. charged by
other cities in our area and is designed only to insure that dri-
vers do not make the same mistake twice.
RESOLUTION NO. 438 CITY POLICY ON BOAT DOCKS. This proposed
resolution would not allow the City to grant agreements with
citizens for private boat docks, beaches, or similar facilities
on City -owned property. It requires that all such facilities
built on City property be maintained and operated by the City
for the benefit of the general public.
Some months ago the City Council requested that the Parks and
Recreation Board make a recommendation on this matter because we
had some requests for boat docks on Lake Winona. At the May 5,
1983 Parks and Recreation Board meeting, the Board unanimously
recommended that the City not allow any dock building or private
development on City -owned property.
The attached Resolution would set a firm policy for the City in-
stead of proceeding on a case -by -case basis.
Sincerely,
George D. Forbes
City Manager
GDP/mgg
;btvv:vrj;w +ee+.IS.
pr,� L �+ "unu"a uaurnr nr,nroa uuru ... w c urHor r, r mnne onn
`.'�' '' 1• ^ate
HERO ROGERS, July 17, 1983
Owner
Clermont City Council
Clermont, Florida 32711
Dear Council Members:
We do hereby respectfully request the Clermont City Council to sign the
necessary documents for the issuance of bonds enabling the Barnett Bank
to purchase the total issue necessary for the financing of the expansion
of the Lake Highlands Retirement & Nursing Center.
This is an "enabling action" which does not obligate the City of Clermont
in any way for any thing. In the event of default in payment of the mort-
gage, the city does not become liable. Please note the following excerpts:
...the Issuer shall never, be required to (i) levy ad valorem '
taxes on any property within its area of operation to pay the
principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the bonds or
to make any other payments provided for under the proposed Loan
Agreement or the Trust Indenture." (Attachment, Item G, Page 2)
"The Issuer shall not be obligated to pay any of the bonds or the
interest thereon from any funds of the Issuer derived from any
source other than the Agreement or the Guaranty, and each bond
shall contain a statement to that effect upon its face. The
Issuer shall not be required to incur any expense with respect
to the Project or the bonds unless requested to do so by the
Borrower, in which event the Borrower hereby agrees to reimburse
the full amount of such expense to the Issuer and the Issuer may
require payment to it of such amount as a prerequesite to its
incurring any such expense." (Attachment, Item #6, Page 6,
Exhibit A)
The necessary documentation and sufficent evidence of the Borrower's
administrative and financial ability has been submitted to satisfy the
requirements of the Purchaser (Barnett Bank) as evidenced by their Letter
of Commitment of June 16, 1983•
Pogo 2
'rho private sale botwoen the Borrower and the Barnett Bank Is a coot
saving factor enabling the Borrower to provide a high quality of care
at a looser coot to the consumer than if the bonds were sold publicly
or the expansion financed conventionally.
'rho expansion of the facility will benefit the community in many ways:
I. IMPROVE THE ECONOMY
1. Increase Employment - Creation of approximately GO new jobs,
bringing the total number of employees
of the Lake Highlands to approximately 150.
2. Increase Cash Plow to the Community - the payroll is estimated to
increase $ 750,000, bringing the annual
payroll of the Lake Highlands to approximately
$1,500,000.
3. Enhance Existing Businesses through the increase in purchases of
goods and services for the facility.
II. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SERVICES
1. MEDICARE SERVICES - Participation in the Medicare Program will
permit those persons requiring these services
to remain in the community rather thantraveling
---- ----
many miles to receive this benefit.
2. RETIREMENT UNITS - Independent living accomodations will be
available for those who desire to be in
proximity to health care services.
III. EXPAND EXISTING SERVICES
1. The number of Skilled Nursing Care Beds will increase from
82 to 142. -
2. The number of private rooms will increase to 25•
3• The number of semi -private rooms (2/rm) will be increased.
4. Space will be available for additional community outreach programs
such as Health Screening Programs, Health
Education Classes, Telephone Assurance Programs
Page 3
'rho Rogers Family has a proven record of commitment to Long Term Caro
of the Older Adult. They have owned and operated the Lake Highlands
Retirement & Nursing Center for 23 years, developing the business from
one building, one guest and no employees to two buildings, providing
three levels of care, 97% occupancy and 93 employees.
During this time, the facility has:
...provided Skilled Nursing Caro to well over one thousand persons
...provided job opportunities to many hundreds of persons
...provided formal educational courses at no cost to scores of individuals
to upgrade job skills (through cooperative arrangement with
Lake County Vocational -Technical School)
...been directly responsible for the construction of the Clermont Seventh -
day Adventist Church which provides:
..a free monthly Health Screening Van Service at
South Lake Plaza
..Welfare Clothing Service
The Center holds a "SUPERIOR" Rating from the Department of Health &
Rehabilitative Services and has four Certified Gerontological Nurses who
direct the Nursing Services Department.
We will greatly appreciate your favorable action in response to this
request and if you require additional information we will be glad to
provide it.
Sincerely,
C*tbe Rooters
mini ator
HLR/t
Encl.
Addendum 1
FACT SHEET
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
LAKE HIGHLANDS RETIREMENT & NURSING CENTER
HERBERT L. ROGERS, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
Licensed Nursing Home Administrator
Fellow, American College of Health Caro Administrators
Former President, Florida Health Care Association
Member, State Nursing Home Ombudsman Committee
(appointed by Governor Graham)
ROWENA E. ROGERS, PRESIDENT
Licensed Nursing Home Administrator
Registered Nurse - Director of Nursing Services
Fellow, American College of Health Care Administrators
Diplomats, Current Secretary, National Geriatrics Society
Dually Certified for Excellence in Practice of Gerontological
Nursing and Nursing Service Administration
Member, Executive Committee, Gerontological Practice Division,
American Nurses' Association
Former President, FLORIDA COUNCIL ON AGING
Appointed by Gov. Askew to Fl. Board of Examiners of Neg.
Home Administrators
HERBERT L. ROGERS, JR., VICE-PRESIDENT
Licensed Nursing Home Administrator
Master's Degree in Public Health
President, District II, Florida Health Care Association
TERESA ROGERS KNIGHT, TREASURER
Licensed Nursing Home Administrator
Registered Nurse - Assistant Director of Nursing Services
Dually Certified for Excellence in Practice of Gerontological
Nursing and Nursing Service Administration
Bachelor's Degree in Nursing
PATRICIA ROGERS GULLETT, SECRETARY
Licensed Practical Nurse
Currently completing educational requirements for a degree
in Nursing
Scheduled to write R.N. Examination in February, 198A
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIV-
ERY BY THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA OF A LETTER OF
INTENT AND INDUCEMENT AGREEMENT TO LAKE HIGHLANDS
RETIREMENT AND NURSING CENTER, INC., A FLORIDA
CORPORATION; WITH RESPECT TO THE COMMISSIONS
ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS IN AN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL
AMOUNT NOT EXCEEDING $2,900,000 TO FINANCE THE PART-
NERSHIP'S LAND ACQUISITION AND THE CONSTRUCTION AND
EQUIPPING THEREON OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS CONSTI-
TUTING COMPLETION AND EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING
NURSING HOME AND ADULT CONGREGATE LIVING FACILITY;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR THIS RESOLUTION. This resolution, here-
inafter called "instrument," Is adopted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 159, Part I,
Florida Statutes (the "Act") and other applicable provisions of law.
SECTION 2. FINDINGS. It is hereby ascertained, determined and declared
as follows:
A. The City of Clermont, Florida (the "Issuer"), is authorized by the Act to
make and execute financing agreements, contracts, deeds and other instruments necessary
or convenient for the purpose of facilitating the financing of the acquisition, construction
and equipping of projects as defined in the Act, including machinery, equipment, land,
rights in land and other appurtenances and facilities related thereto, to the end that the
Issuer may be able to promote the economic growth of the State of Florida, increase
opportunities for gainful employment and otherwise contribute to the welfare of the State
of Florida and its inhabitants, and to finance the cost of such projects by the issuance of
its revenue bonds.
B. Lake Highlands Retirement and Nursing Center, Inc., a Florida corpora-
tion (the "Borrower") wishes to finance expansion of an existing nursing home and adult
congregate living facility owned by the Borrower consisting of facilities for 60 new
nursing beds and 29 adult congregate living units (the "Project"); and the Borrower has
requested that the Issuer indicate to the Borrower its intentions in this respect in order to
induce the Borrower to proceed with the Project and incur expenses for its initiation and
its financing and by this resolution take affirmative official action toward the issuance of
such bonds within the meaning of Section 1.103 8(a)(5) of the Internal Revenue Service
Regulations, as amended, pertaining to Industrial Development Bonds.
C. The location of the Project in the Issuer's area of operation shall make a
significant contribution to the economic growth of the area of operation of the Issuer,
shall provide gainful employment for persons in the City of Clermont, Florida. The
Project will serve a public purpose by advancing the economic prosperity and the general
welfare of the State of Florida and its people. The Project will constitute a "health care
LKL 6/27/83-603
Rev.7/11/83 -1-
facility" including a nursing home and an adult congregate living facility within the
meaning of the Act.
D. Giving due regard to the financial strength of the Borrower (as demon-
strated by evidence deemed satisfactory to the issuer which has been previously furnished)
and all other factors determinative of the Borrower's capabilities, financial 4nd otherwise,
�q of fulfilling its obligations consistently with the purposes of the Act, the Borrower itself
is financially responsible and fully capable and willing to fulfill its obligations under the
>� proposed Loan Agreement (hereinafter defined), including the obligation to pay the
installments upon the loan in the amounts and at the times required and the obligation to
repair and maintain at Its own expense the Project, and the Borrower is desirous of
serving the purposes of the Act and is willing and capable of fully performing all other
obligations and responsibilities imposed upon It by the Loan Agreement.
E. The appropriate governmental entities and utility providers are capable
of providing, when needed, all the necessary public facilities, utilities and services that
will be necessary for the operation, repair, improvement and maintenance of the Project
and on account of any increase in population or other circumstances resulting by reason of
the location of the Project within the area of operation of the Issuer are available now or
can be provided when needed.
F. The proceeds from the issuance of bonds by the Issuer will be loaned to
the Borrower pursuant to a Loan Agreement to be entered into between the Issuer and the
Borrower (the "Loan Agreement'). Adequate provision will be made under the provisions
of the Loan Agreement for financing of the acquisition, construction and equipping of the
Project at the expense of the Borrower, and for the payment of the principal of and - -'
premium, if any, and interest on the bonds. The bonds will be issued pursuant to a trust
agreement (the "Trust Indenture') to be entered into between a trustee bank and the
Issuer.
G. The principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the bonds and all
payments required under the proposed Loan Agreement and the Trust Indenture securing
the bonds shall be payable solely from the proceeds derived by the Issuer under the
proposed Loan Agreement, and the Issuer shall.never be required to (1) levy ad valorem
taxes on any property within its area Lop to pay the principal of and premwm? _ f
propose-d loan Agreement or the Trust Indenture; a pay the same irom a
Issuer other than those derived by the Issuer under the proposed Loan Agreement; or (III)
require or enforce any payment or performance by the Borrower as provided by the Loan
Agreement or the Trust Indenture unless the Issuer's expenses in respect thereof shall be
paid from moneys derived under the Loan Agreement or shall be advanced to the Issuer
for such purposes, and the issuer shall receive indemnity to its satisfaction. Such bonds
shall not constitute a lien upon any property owned by or situated within the area of
operation of the Issuer except the Project. Neither the faith and credit nor the taxing
power of the Issuer or of the State of Florida or any political subdivision thereof shall be
pledged to the payment of the bonds.
H. The Borrower's performance of its obligations, financial and otherwise,
under the Loan Agreement shall be secured by a first mortgage lien on real property and a
security interest in the project furnishings, machinery and equipment.
LKL 6/27/83-603 -2-
I. The Issuer will receive an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel
that the Interest on the bonds will be exempt from federal income taxation under existing
laws of the United States at the closing of the bond Issue.
SECTION 3. AUTAORTLATION OF EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF
INDUCEMENT LETTER. The Chairman of the Issuer is hereby authorized to execute, and
the Secretary of the issuer is hereby authorized to attest, the Issuer's letter or letters
addressed to the Borrower and Its affiliates in substantially the form attached to this
resolution as Exhibit A and incorporated herein, with such changes therein, whether made
prior to the execution thereof or thereafter, as shall be approved from time to time by
such officers executing the same, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by their
execution thereof.
Such officers and all other officers and employees of the Issuer are hereby
authorized to execute such further agreements and take such further action as shall be
necessary to carry out the intent and purposes expressed in such letter attached as Exhibit
A, upon becoming an agreement on its execution by the Borrower, and are further
authorized to take such other steps and actions as may be required and necessary in order
to issue such bonds.
SECTION A. EFFECTIVE DATE. This instrument shall take effect
Immediately upon its adoption.
Adopted with a quorum present and voting this the day of ,
1983.
CITY OF CLERMONT
CITY COUNCIL
(SEAL)
By:
Chairman
Attest:
Secretary
LKL 6/27/83-603 ' -3-
EXHIBIT A
Mr. Herbert L. Rodgers , 1983
Lake highlands Retirement and Nursing Center
151 East Minnehaha Avenue
Clermont, Florida 32711
RE: Proposed acquisition, construction and equipping by Lake
Highlands Retirement and Nursing Center, a Florida
corporation, of additions to and completion of an existing
health care facility consisting of a nursing home and adult
congregate living facility (the "Project"), situated in the
City of Clermont, Florida, and the financing thereof with
industrial development revenue bonds issued by the City
of Clermont, Florida.
Gentlemen:
Based upon recent discussions with officials of Lake Highlands Retirement and
Nursing Center (the "Borrower"), It is the understanding of the officials and representa-
tives of the City of Clermont, Florida (the "Issuer"), that the Borrower wishes to finance
expansion of an existing nursing home and adult congregate living facility owned by the
Borrower consisting of facilities for 60 new nursing beds and 29 adult congregate living
units (the "Project"); that the Project will cost approximately $2,900,000 and that the
willingness of the Issuer to Issue and sell Its industrial development revenue bonds for the
purpose of financing the Project is an important fact under consideration by the Borrower
in determining the extent of the feasibility of the Project.
The Issuer has determined that the Issuer's Issuance of Its bonds to assist the
Borrower by financing such Project will result in the construction of a necessary facility
and that the Issuer's issuance of such bonds will serve a public purpose by advancing the
economic prosperity and the general welfare of the State of Florida and its people.
Accordingly, in order to induce the Borrower to incur expenses for the
initiation of such Project and its financing, the Issuer hereby makes the following
proposal:
1. The Issuer will issue its industrial development revenue bonds in one or
more installments totaling in the aggregate principal amount a sum not to exceed
$2,900,000 for the purpose of paying the cost of the Project. The bonds will be issued in
such aggregate principal amount, mature at such times, bear interest at such rates and be
subject to such other terms as shall be agreed upon between the Issuer and the Borrower.
2. The Issuer and the Borrower will enter into a Loan Agreement (the
"Agreement") which shall provide for the loan of the bond proceeds to the Borrower for
LKL 7/11/83-603 -4-
the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Realty and the Project and repayment
of the loan by the Borrower. The Borrower's performance of its obligations, financial and
otherwise, under the Agreement shall be secured by first mortgage lien on the entire
facility, a security Interest in the Project furnishings, machinery, furniture and
equipment, and the Guaranty and Indemnification Agreement to be entered Into by
Herbert L. and Rowena Rodgers, jointly and severally (the "Guaranty Agreement"), all for
the benefit and protection of the bondholders. The installment payments to be made by
the Borrower in repayment of the loan pursuant to the Agreement shall be pledged to the
payment of the principal of, Interest on and redemption premium, if any, applicable to the
bonds and the fees and expenses of the trustee. Upon payment in full of the installments
of the loan and all other payments under the Agreement, the lien of the Trust Indenture to
be entered into by and between the Authority and the trustee (the "Trust Indenture"), and
the Agreement shall be dlscharged� The loan installments shall be fully sufficient only to
pay the cost of the Project, the cost and expenses of financing the same, and the expenses
of the Borrower, the trustee and the Issuer related thereto.
3. The Issuer will cooperate in the prompt preparation of the Agreement
and the necessary resolutions for the authorization and sale of the bonds.
4. Upon delivery of the bonds, the provisions of this proposal and the
agreement resulting from its acceptance by the Borrower shall have no further effect, and
in the event of any inconsistency between the terms of this proposal and the terms of the
Agreement in the form in which it shall be finally approved by resolution of the Issuer, the
provisions of the Agreement as so approved shall control.
5. Upon acceptance by the Borrower of this proposal, the Issuer shall keep
open and outstanding this commitment and inducement to the Borrower for a period of
twelve months from the date of this proposal unless sooner terminated in accordance with
the provisions of subparagraph (b) of paragraph (7) hereof. In the event, for any reason
whether or not the fault of the Issuer, the bonds are not delivered to the purchaser or
purchasers thereof prior to the termination of this commitment, then the provisions of
this proposal and the agreement resulting from its acceptance by the Borrower shall be
cancelled unless the Issuer at its option, by resolution duly adopted shell elect to extend
this commitment to a later date. In the event of cancellation by agreement between the
Borrower and the Issuer, neither party shall have any rights against the other and no third
party shall have any rights against either party except:
(a) The Issuer will transfer and convey to the Borrower all the Project
components (and sites, if any) which shall have been acquired by the Issuer;
(b) The Borrower will pay to the Issuer the amount of all expenses which
shall have been incurred by the Issuer in connection with the Project and which wer
authorized by the Borrower;
(c) The Borrower will assume and be responsible for all contracts entered
into by the Issuer at the request of the Borrower in connection with the Project; and
(d) The Borrower will pay the out-of-pocket expenses of officials and
representatives of the Issuer and counsel for the Issuer incurred in connection with the
Project and will pay Livermore Klein h Lott, P.A., bond counsel for the Issuer, reasonable
legal fees for legal services related to the Project or the financing thereof.
LKL-7/11/83-603 -5-
6. The Issuer.sh411 not be obligated to pay any of the bonds, or the interest,,.
thereon from any funds of thelssuer derived from any source other than tho,Agroomont,o,r_,
the (Guaranty, and each bond shall contain a statement to that effect upon Its face. The
Issuer shall not be required to incur any expense with respect to the. Projeet_or the bonds.
unless requested to do so by the Borrower, in which avent the Borrower harotiy agrees to,
reimburse the full amount of such expense to the Issuer; and tlic:Issuer may, require
payment to it of such amount as a prerequisite to its Ineu.Mng any such expense Thq
Borrower in accepting this proposal, will thereby agree to_indemnify_and defend the Issuer,
and hold the Issuer harmless'against any and all claims, losses, IlatiI sties or damages to.,
property -or any injury or death of any person or persons occurring in_oonneeflon with the_
construction, equipping and operation of the Project by or on behalf of the Borrower, or fn,
any way ggrrowing but or resulting from this proposal (upon_1ts becoming an egreement_It
nccePted).including,_withouf,;aimitat[on, all costs and expenses.of the Issuer, including
reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred in the enforcement_o. any agreement of the Borrower
herein contained in the Agreement and, in -the eve the_bonds_are not ell, is
'Indemnity shall survive the termination of the agreement resulting from the Borrower's
acceptance of this proposal.
7. The proposal of the Issuer as set forth herein is subject to the following
conditions:
(a) The Borrower shall, from the date hereof until the sale of the bonds
provide a balance sheet and income statement of the Borrower in reasonable detail for
and within 50 (fifty) days following the end of each of the first three quarters of the
Borrower's fiscal year and an audited balance sheet and income statement for and within
120 days of the end of the Borrower's fiscal year. Nothwithstanding the Borrower's
obligation to provide such financial statements, until sale of the bonds, the Borrower shall
within 10 (ten) days after its occurrence, notify the Issuer of any material change,
whether or not adverse, in the business, operations or financial condition of the Borrower.
(b) In the event the Issuer shall, at any time prior to the sale of the bonds,
determine in its sole discretion that there has been a material adverse change in the
business, operations or financial conditions of the Borrower, whether or not such
determination is based upon the financial statements or notices provided by the Borrower
in accordance with paragraph (a) above, the obligation of the Issuer to issue and sell the
bonds shall, at the option of the Issuer, be terminated.
(c) The Issuer shall continue to have the legal authority without the further
authorization or approval of any other governmental body other than the approval
required by paragraph 8 hereof to issue the bonds. In the event action by any other
governmental body is required the Issuer shall use reasonable efforts on its own behalf or
on the behalf of the Borrower to obtain such approval. If any such additional approval is
required and has not been or cannot be obtained within the time period provided in
paragraph 5 hereof then the obligation of the Issuer to issue the bonds shall at the option
of the Issuer be terminated.
(d) A Certificate of Need shall be issued by the Department of Health and
Rehabilitative Services covering the nursing home portion of the Project. 1-1-1G,7
(e) All public hearings and approval requirements imposed by Section 103(k)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, shall have been complied with by, or
for, the Issuer.
If this proposal shall be satisfactory to the Borrower, please have the
acceptance statement which follows this proposal executed by the proper officers of the
LKL-7/11/83-603 -6-
Borrower duly authorized and provide an executed copy to the Issuer, whereupon this
proposal will constitute an agreement In principle with respect to the matters herein
contained.
(SEAL)
Attest:
Yours very truly,
CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA
By:
Chairman
Secretary
The terms and conditions contained in the foregoing proposal by the City of
Clermont, Florida are hereby accepted as of this day of , 1983.
LAKE HIGHLANDS RETIREMENT AND
NURSING CENTER, INC.
By:
201 Soulh Oran0o Avonuo
` •
•
Orlando, Florida 32801
305/O46.3400
Mr. Herbert L. Dodgers
Chairman
Lake Highlands Fetirement and Nursing Center, Inc
151 Past Minnehaha Avenue
Clermont, Florida 32711
Dear Mr. Dodgers:
I am pleased to advise you that the anoved tkcie foll�cxaing ocommitment
k:
Bank of Central Florida, N.A. has apple
to purchase a 52,900,000 Industrial EzE Centel:
Thi cf���nt
Lake Highlands Retirement and Nursing
is subject to the following terms and other conditions as the bank p
may deem necessary.
Amount: $2,900,000
r 60 new nursing beds , 29 adult
Purpose: Addition of facilities fo%f—
congregate living facility units, ears« �F ag }
ate 't-'�,•"�aei�t�+-roams,
completion of kitchen, dining and common areas to the
existing Lake Highlands facility.
Rate: To fluctuate at 788 of the Barnett Bank ofJackt date,
Prime rate, changing monthly on the loan payment
provided the interest on the bonds remains tax free
to the bank. Should the corporate tax rate to the bank
change or interest on the bonds be taxable, to a greater
degree that at the closing date, the interest rate will
be adjusted or the bank will be indemnified to cover the
additional y to le,ould the the ate will be adjusted torest on the the
Bernet fully + 1% effective the
Barnett Bank of JacksonvillePrime le.
date the interest is fully
3f of 1%, Payable on acceptance of this comu.tment.
Fee: !
Repayment: Interest only to L7ecember 31, 1984, then a 13ip year
monthly Payments of principal and
amortization with
interest. Principal portion of the Payment will be
adjusted at least annually to give an even payment
over the remaining amortization period.
Closing: Prior to December 31, 1983
June 16, 1983
Page 2
call provisions: Every year beginning five years from the initial
funding date, the Hank has the option of calling
due the unpaid balance of the bonds plus accrued
interest by filing notice at least ninety (90)
days in advance.
Collateral: First mortgage on land, buildings, and fixtures,
furniture, and equipment per plans, specifications
and inventories to be approved by the bank.
Guarantors: Herbert L. and Rowena Rodgers
other conditions: 1. Harnett Bank Trust Company, N.A. to act as trustees.
2. Bond counsel to be approved by the bank or, at the
banks option, Hank Attorney to act as review attorney.
All docurmntation to be prepared by Bond counsel.
3. All out of pocket expenses including, but not limited
to, Bond and Hank attorneys fees, issuer's fee, trustee
fees, mortgage broker fees are the responsiblity
of the borrower and may be paid out of bond proceeds
as allowed by attorneys.
4. Bonds are subject to validation as indicated by Bank
Attorney.
5. Final plans, specifications, cost breakdown and
construction contract are subject to approval of the
bank.
6. Construction inspector is subject to approval of
the bank.
7. Subject to MAI appraisal on completed facility
of at least $4,150,000. Choice of appraiser subject
to bank approval.
8. Corporate property will not be sold without written bank
approval, other than in normal course of business.
9. Corporate stock will not be sold by the guarantor
or otherwise transferred without written bank approval.
10. Borrower and architect will warrant that the planned
facilities meet state Medicaid and local building codes.
11. The corporation will provide the bank with a copy
of the annual state Department of Health and
Rehabilitative Services audit and inspection reports
of the facility.
June 16, 1983
Page 3
12. The Corporation will provide the bank with
annual and quarterly CPA caviled financial
statements, signed by a corporate officer.
13. Guarantors will annually provide the bank
with a signed CPA compiled financial statement
and IRS tax return.
14. The Corporation and guarantors will maintain
their primary depository accounts at Barnett
Bank.
15. The loan will be governed by the documents prepared
by Bond Counsel, Bank Counsel and the bank.
In addition, the following interim construction loan conmi.tment
has been approved subject to the following terms.
Amount: $2,900,000
Purpose: construction of the above facility additions
Rate: Barnett Bank of Jacksonville Prime rate + 2%
Repayment terms: Principal due one year from funding, interest
payable monthly. Funding under the IRB will
pay out this loan.
Collateral: same as IRB commitment above
Guarantors: same as IRB camiitment above
Funding: Prior to December 31, 1983
other conditions: Funding is at the option of the bank and only
after IRB validation proceedings have been
capleted or waived by Bank Attorney.
All other conditions the same as the IRB commitment
above.
Please sign and return the enclosed copy of this letter as evidence
of your acceptance of the terms and conditions of this commitment. The
commitment will expire July 1, 1983 if not accepted by you on or before
that date.
June 17, 1983
Page 4
I am pleased to offer this commitment and I look forward
to working with you on this project. The finished facility
will be a very attractive facility that will allow you to greatly
expand your services and I know we both want to see the project
progress as rapidly as possible.
Sincerely,
John D. Hallstrom
Vice President
The above " and conditions of this commitment are accepted
201 South Orange Avenue
Sulto 600
Orlando, Florldn 32801
305/040.3400
July 18, 1983
Mr. Herbert Rogers, Chairman
Lake Highlands Retirement and Nursing Center, Inc.
151 Bnst Minnehaha Avenue
Clermont, Florida 32711
Dear Herb:
This letter is to confirm that I have provided you with,
unexecuted copies of the Inducement Resolution and Letter of
Intent and Inducement Agreement relating to the $2,900,000
industrial revenue bond issue for the expansion of your nursing
home facility. These documents have been prepared by the bond .
counsel the bank has chosen to document this issue and to
provide the bank with opinions that the issue is legally
issued and that the interest will be exempt from federal income
taxes under existing law.
Per this resolution, the City of Cl.ermont would issue the
bonds which the bank has_FWumitted to purchase. With they -
purchase of the bonds the bank will be secured by a first
mo gage en tthe-rea-l-property-of-th>T ake:i ighiande
I ent n urf Inc nnd�so_by-�eurit-y_
-etr-s-€rnihng_machinery Brrest yand equ.pment.
We have anal.yzsd the�nP.ticiaLstsen�th of the center's
operations and feel that the cash_fjoF+�from net income and_
depreciation wil cover the bond repayment schedule. Should .'
operations not provide LuE dLrq,r,rn repayment,-the-.oan_Agree-
m n an rust To enturg will allow ns tg ook to the property
of the center and to you an your wife personally under void___.
guaran es .or repwyment. Th e is no liability on the City
`of-C. moo[ to provide for repayment on the
If you have any questions concerning your liabilities or those
of the center and your wife in relation to these documents or
those that will be prepared to close the bond issue, it may be
advisable to consult an attorney of your choice.
Sincerely,
John D. Hallstrom
Vice President
JD11:nf
R�IIIIIIIRAII�
a' 10 5' E CC m �• n pv' a Sp gTiPHRup
Y
also w m G .o••� Vi' n0 G G d. '�O� G7 Q'`G o my
M
N n m ; �. �, O Q O.
5 El HQ croaao ..."'" 5'v'o'°�oao
5' `G �. G? r �.b i ryGry A m m oo�� �� n y �• O ao o
oim'o�owgW-Z"ol am IV ma c" n \V
° 0 �v000 00°ea Foyna C,00ti n
g•o fibo•aoq o
o7`e�ROoco.o^'rod �uso8nn� v
M A P'., �' ti o? m 7 •�n' ti• w ry as m 7 m p ��
F ov. 00 ooaooyao o 5'v;,EE Ay5 c O. -n l//''V
�..�-n b, r..],. ,� m p� n V � 7 �
Ing
YMOM
jo
So5�a �»$p�mo �;GWA = J
E S ;< `e 0 5 g OR .'oor a- Sao' 3 l J Cn
5 e� r3Py �wam�'So'�-
g o o �' n od 'c7 n � �
�n P.
50
`l J
5• ;,,�o E yy 5' C nl rur a bH iD� 7 rM: ii a a is �� r.; €fY� tl,r � G 5 ��� �.
Mcapr' d H fLu, 3 a F3 �8 " im
n r: ' o n
~c�"��FP'=ya°$u���D.Wn.'x�rypF r^��"'•����°�.ju•��'p Ym`.»�c..�'~'" l a,°M,� q
�..�',G�.,'° .;r ,ro5rjrtn'°°Pdr16,b7
°= _o a a a ro ci d G� F av
W • �• 6 0.va •p w rc a �. �. m .� •- a 5 b7 t� rn �' J. Y' w r y
' ";r•"of7.. g�.w»P„ '�
.�' g '� ro ro p^ � � a• n a � pr '`o' u�'.. '° ti i'. uc f'
W ii W .» ? 0. a � 7 rD n. � U C 4 ."�. W G '.0.. ^ ° 5• � ''X Rn tWT N �,% � n � r y M �..
ul 5 a• ,a m n
� y V �� � � o a a � m 5 G 7 �' b ry it » %= °^. �'• g F. 5 .� o `,�'' r.ry-• ; y ''�. c g `°�' ° F � a' S•
o'.o l a �; �. gQ t.°a, -n �•c m .°�, m na p.°v 5 t"r `°•' w'� ,�,''t cr un 5 �' an
6 o r aye B ��. ° B c` �'� ir'(?',•c'�i•5'o•y�S� `tS.r •°^^ r.A ^ `•' a m �•.:
•7� '�5 a»9 s`°a ns�,w`o'd��o, r3 `a'S• 86i o•
r. e � G' 5' � °, ° 0 9 � E cwi, in•wo °' i � G:' � � w a `° v ,.; a�,
e _ c b7 r�• a''7 m .��•+
g:. o 5'o c"°�•
W 3 �5 m �•o,^��'. 5 �av w Q. y7' m%
w w V1av 5"' m B -W. atwi m wr •��
v= W S •K 0-ana an m L.
�. °• ,,w•.59n E �. S � ° A o' � E� n270 .0� m
cc ��5• R'o .��5: p 5 �• na "� a�K'.5'u pro. g5A
E S'o'o'i 'o ro m ,cy c io �• n a o w °-%''°. �• 5' n
o a '� n 9 � Q'�a o•��o � � 7. ro aaa a ❑ a �•� ,�.
5�,�• �n•,oMS; K•m ro�.°ro "^ aa. 7�mi`°n� �n5•i✓'p'w .�� »viu�
ti w � 5' ro C C. ry rn n
caw G•o 5i' �•Fo "5 90 c S aro o•a�.,':'a o•o•� 5.A ro m c+ ,
?. &. =.'°o , n n' °' b , $' a:• m � 7' ro t^' ro m 0 o w n m 5i
�..7, � �o o °•o .+.., p »,o� a � ro ,-°'w ,.-a °' n �+ � a, ac `� rb' � °i � y
o o aG i°.`°, �' ,t a F^ w m •� o an o i!, Yc a b' ° d•
c."^ow �au�yHr'Dowv'r ro o Wro
m W in
N rv° m N 5 o Ci G a W 61 O
p�����N
��o FG(n W�C•�G
yyr°io �a+a•'0 m O
C+••.i
rao G'yO Oh
n•.a-.ct
ty
N
y �' A p w- 'a
O a' m 'O % fro+ '�
rD •-•. rp p, W �
^• D O' ! y h? m
�
::. W h 0.
i
O A
G �
" d :�' ry
`�•.ca. nm n y o°.,°.,r5
� ib O m
C •.�
�•w G•5.
v, �
a G �
� �ro•,'''6:a
A i
p .a.. p � ,a.,
• �i
a ^
�
Q.
p� p
�
a i7 o• v'
! ,.j �. r•'
."
-Oi ^
r
W •i °
,p.,,'�C�.. O
n' .7^. N
G
N�R v•.
y
��,�^mo5o
N O
"' S. y. �� •n A-�
na
w• _'v°+a o�
�^�
V'G.� 5'
m w C n y�i±'pOr a �..°
C r
..-•' S A tCi 'G O O
O ro :4
O~ C
'O ro N
N O n
5 Ui Chi, ���� 0. G
a, �
O '^
ro 7
��� G..
G N ,^
� roNS�L'�Ryw�rc
5 G� O• m
row
rF•,.
m
f'Sav� 5 t"ro
G. cJ
vo
E G C�
oG.�rS+ Fn
p'
C7
N
m ••
O O• '•I' ,
�.
G. n 5
v5i C ^ G :' . i-O,•
�
bJ O
N
5
�' � G �
� � o SRO'^ � d S
G
] �• A. o •Wo � S m �
ti n
N � � � � �
� � 7
m g.
a
505
pWaSd ��
roro
``•• < C�]
W 50an�
O NCN
m o C
N»
<nH =°
a
50
�,
�ro�,°
o
,-i
O
.°''WO ytrJ tl
O, x-ro „^,. ii
n 5• m N.
a N va a '�O C E 7 C7
o
n .. G m fn
R.
°• p �•tz
��5c �o
voES'o w
5'„a� �n�o�.Fac
roW o oA-
ro
a
aoZ a
a �•5• •mow
Y�.� o E'o.w
�a 5 o
m o
.ry ,C �m 5
�•
av p S
y^.o
n
a o o
p F. •�
y N» o o a o �. a
'l1 W G.
�• o o
o B
a. CD
° �
E �,
CA
won. N c o• o• .+ ry w• a, � °, D ": a 5' n. 5 a � .°°. � '2 o�
�� ro °:°�'a�"�row�� 523•<�.a"r'1 n.p a /, � 5 �a" �
gKo c ro :�u
»•�o•°c tia, x� or'('•-°Ud vc,»Y„ �' ro <° 'v °'�"'ia
^°"�mc'•w5 b
o.°`' a.•ryQ-•3G',"w•°�!••..''c^P�Oro���
3 ^°n] °n aE^yn ,w5'p jro 5'tr
wo p•o uo'��5a �, ° °�m °'" tr Fcr
��+"o��'a•...r�R^
°ayy oro» � "5 gel a `-rGa �[�' „o°5a°ry°�v"r��'SE'<
',�'."� x p. v ° �: � G„• .. c o! t5 5
" ^L
°a
5
�.�, N y��w 5 �'ro ° m o � :;� a. ]•� �°-� .o o• ., � n »'r�° °-° ° »'� � °' xg n. as
,° ro G'°c ^' a o'3 R •°. :. Rmdj
° scNB A wG G»ma aRs o ° rn �� °`•� ° cm ro.
,00 c� 7:°•5 G 9•,° a• m,°° �.9 � �$ w »,° '� $'� ro r✓n tnb ^ d � " P
x c°
m soroG $b '° x� tr'°�S' ° 3' G"C�Sa owro
05 w°m a9A �v`,
G.•o vv �� c5 o,p.w tn�.s'° �'� c � v 5.��'� �'`° a 5 c °� � n w � � � o � '° °a �
�yp+ m gg
R � � o v; `.v�A °b ° d`"� G• �'.'d` �v »�° n'^ � b�.tr, 9 fD �°'� m ;;'� 8 c ��GN.
�o w°oNSs�'�°vmo'�_ "fib»SFr
ato �•"co »d,�y
w m a° a G Y 5'
a°� '< .... x ^, a � ° °oy r, n 'o �• 5 : m tr- r ��
%$o
o o 5 ro •? �...� ° ,°° m n' » `°^ =• n• f° o' 7 q :' wb '0 5 G' L'. ^ °n''�' °� w °
rl
'". °'" R'c�• m oa ^ o 0 5 o.j<< '° o•w °'�' w `^ �pG• oy r"° na.•c+ a »•o
ro
^ n
^ o F K
w c _.ylo
,"{ m m n m m'o m n. r%o G WP.o m a•.a�. �'ra"o m A �' c 7 nr"°� �. C•.c ......
w d ._ -
O C 0-
c
a
N•°»�N 5c w wo
,°-• o y tdt7o cro m
wb •�° C°co ra.tr
• ro o°i ° ro
p O y °•rn N n'
❑ o m w � N °
�GB�o Ny,�Now:
y?'wS wrow+'a�,
ro b
W5Flo, 2 a El a,
5 ~'SC7 °
5 O X
'cr
C o•�»omNro oa0_°o`°°m
-wn'-•rc°0,mW.Sac•o
y vna d.° m m N mts
W oo'3^m GG'2.
P
=GG.
5 w
N ° 7 C -. O ._" O A ".
m i n f0 O' ^° C' C° ri m A
o'^a,.jV n'..
mo'G»m9".om^roro9000c
y c� o?a+roA '�� o
o »N•o ^.��0. ��i
;°arooa vc..
'< T a Ora G C ry
wo•c+^�
mo;,'gnw..o;.'o w .°,ELC) v°
O' w F 7.d"
N o
C .. .7 .`:.
o�ow
� 5 ro 1'na� A � io Tro
�
_ .��, n.a N 5p,caro
< O
O
•+ o o
,� w c con• b
a•e »5v° w o °a
•°�i
o°° w o '° o w o
"• m ro •••i n 5 5 ac .`.'.c°'O `ro' ro 5
C
I
w. O Y o- 7 = "m H ...
$ 5 c^c+ � � " m � � �
„°nG'�G
•ror
n' o 'm' o � o � � `•° °a '^ = w c a p.
B'oo�..wc• cod.
roma.
� rL
r
ff �vgo'atc n^w 6m o�$GmSc co�oGoR ]•�5w7'^ [° foA
G,S,((�0•�o[:n.9 a�p»w•d'•?m'n^•�' tb
A';,,
Pad, AS c,n, w,��^C3. �37 Y5.-i »'•,°yom^.m G.�o; �. P, G'�ooro5
O�c.MyAmcQC.NS °0 mAB��° »��5acn o50 m
r•v, m , iu w o �v p,m n 5 ^ ' u, a.av o pf0'
y v! - c 5',fC1co5 G'R0 NR0 t m not^G�w 2a% v�w <
`°.�..•C mw 5 0.'�' '*
yr .�i p,5 �.� 5 m'o, •�' ° p, $, _. uZ u, �y�; ��o 5.
con�G'o-u,�? •v: ,,, �An.S �oH<. .^°5� o 07q - 2w c H
o a c v a 5. 5 °, ❑ o o Tj P, . w� a _. 0 m
x� �eia'c��a o;-'^_.'° y''- CJ,So�•ua c.5,5o•`oii'c5r�oan.c
^G"00- y .,� n"; 0.1•v'-'.^:..5'�"'o'G•�%u v�A.=7oE�� :°5t'7y q
t7aac w ^ w y ^acrra p 5' n' gyp, ct
E5 ° o„ cr C� o m" a G F mf-a•% a [rtaa n .m m
Ew a a. Cwyl. n o' a ` 0 .�i� n ^ m 5 to Ci .. C0ryi '°j '? '`'• �' w CJ';6" ram. C, W 10 O n W,a V 'o G'
0. •o "° M z L. °^ v
tnc^•.v a P';, $ 5 w i" c m o o G G'()v w �'a'OA•c;? m'm u�'m'� 5'.' a o •w � 7� °9
5 » w 7 . 9 �' S' ,p✓, rryp 'tov[ �' „a•o o• a : a a ' o':^ rya R•,, m '� o,
�"' O^�' V,' W n r ° °U,• o m m p' n o m. y „ w a' o m 0, g a
�9' ry � � �• p Ell vmi
4, a• n p �. G' in P a p a
y .° °
N' to o m � 5' o` o P• a� d. 5' p w m o''my m �^••o ° mo w ... � p� tp�, c a o m m^ o � ro• � 0 5 a
'9^ 13..3`w•.O
a '� m 5.o t,b CL w moO':Rj
a
'o
^
C
w. woc5•o ;:
o5a,-•�09 w::^aEFam'• .m°a' tSS dw'om-• •o9`° �..•
0 oorr�» mOw'm�vwo�5'O0�mt7 °a�m� 0Sa
GaDpa
°w, F m o o. ^ w ao• 0.. a '- °• m°a pa °, �
d N ,^° »- 0 7 7' �'J..:: y O ?. ti "^• c°+ fn` .•°u 0 ° - W ° ;+ ". g O
o.va�� xoNa°in` lov c "5
0. o o ti.y 'a a. f° o vn �. `•5,� E✓'
p,•o � c 9'o .. 3 � � o N 0•ti
O ^eFs a•M �^�oGcd ��a-nwi�`-w �•.mo•anaE F F*V ff
p c c
•. w w� w'•^. N .. •� G n m� T m ti• c q '.'• T1 7 0
p •� 5 v um,. n. �.^, w .o'� n„ n. ;m, ? m 'n ?, o
-
��
-
' 05 ° n � � 0 »'a.a•_. n.^_.^A3v_,.o^°."o n.a'm 7�nq. oa
a' N D � � a ^ 0 5"0 � � '� a � 'n N. G � » c o r°c nmi c'' " o c 7 ^ o -, o ? n w �• ^ 04 a v,
m SG.^m •,�,•GOCO m� C�a �.w. •�'-ti iDw ���w�,ryo V, Mry ���,•_,�� aO '.
a G 'O w C^ p � n o'O ^ m � f1 a� � 0. A � •n ,� m o: d _'i 5 ^• G '� n 0� O N N � 0. r
5a.°m�5oawo`•°�•c.�o�yn�•oTOamw55^7'c��'�.= nao°v.��P`�� 5'`< �u
'o �'G,NCN-fD m'»�ONmo�°i p,'7 ..;5 aam�a.n m'�?•°•"°'� °� 8m�-� '�
Ncirow o>'�o^u�m ° :; om`�°o,o�3❑G•U•°o`o'm5o�^ o'� 'tl�" [0•� G e
o.vm,00.,��°�g.� C.`mo�c, "CA`m'o.mcm o'� =..5 o.a °•'G °°'m�ry�`m"'` m me°
o �
5a' 7»oC 0 a O�w m N7�.m��Q':�'S��a 0.%.O G•°O•� as [
w°�Gcv,oA x'�7mo�a o �.G7m "m a• 'a, o� o fn 'c
a "�".O 7•� �V, 7,n uwi N .mi m -•N �•a O v7n
a a m n.v m �e 0-n•'-'� 5 p o�v - .3 m �'y
°, � '$ '•c+. ro � to ^° o m ww. °' o o• � � � � N � ;0 9. o• u, 3 5 '^ m W ° � `< ' b m w � '" � '..`{
5 m o �. ,o o ^] coo ?=. 5 c ^7• o F' °^
0.c,C» me"mrii:�°:g�" ❑ ° �'^ GSP. '0m•,o'wm 0•r t' ..ma..-
c '� Ca4 w 7 p: �
Eji"•0 , c°, w•ymm3'xr,mG°-y mmym�yr'• rom '
w o 0 7° n y'0 0vmi moot ,0 5 a y _ .0 `'. a ❑ :'�
mm^Nyiowom°o ro `v'�bg n c " N' a° 'yo •
w, m5w
yo5.�yo vN=Ow�.o 7=•�° �5c°� °won .0yv°
otr"•voa.-: ao,^„oa" r�'m".,a�aa, p1-�o•�c a.va.� otsm;eNv�.
vim
o o°�m'7;' A=•�.aacy���•oo ommN°
vt7 ':�
r5 z t
x9 t# 1
,
'dY' J ivit
1fi f
! f�rr37�S"{Jijn + ,
(
r � �
AI
S!Y�t y tf �yy 1i�Nlaa(J� �I
+ 1
I,w
fir, 'i1 A y
F+
a
ft
+ fl�
�
yr�
e 'zi ' '` �t< d ,,vi �- 1 ,z1 •i. ai } t Y 6ff �t- x a drr ,
r� M t� a STti a �v nee s aFcjn r
't� }$y. ` sE„•'r r+.rys'f £
An
{�u,�q� 'M1�"�'�+•"i�'k�af�t�����,�'�ti`�piu5�t�ti}�^>yal�rl��`r�dr'3�4rns�i���i,�'ta"k..4trft,r,r'��,�Fv��,�t i�c�' - r +
Ej�n 4�s✓ �.�' (}'} f ' s y y rS Y`j Y J de i �' r7 ( �' in�.S�
• ay !' + q� 7"M,xi r ��' fi pa�P� � �� �'�. �1,�ys `��,� riti�sto 4z�r�r7ry $f 4�('`tk�t Arnt�rhf`r `��A�Yc�l,rr�'�� Y�
-5 t b��t�Z`i� �' ` i�r 5 �+ �. j{Y �C�,p,, ,�'t'L�xFr Axalk� f ��ry-�)�?N 5tix actfN.'f� ! uJ• #rp ' I#! � f J'IX`�'
�a:dMN rh '` s � :z*r +r� Tf� �r � yrl rEY2Pe C #1a• Y,'r� tt 1s,`+t�'�1 � � s� �.% x
lM
f 1�14i; Fri�tr �+.. x'>Y�,{, .a v.. (��., n a,J � , b.�„ �- Sky. ,� .,f .r+.�s,, ,"ti,,'., .i�} � a ��• `
f�
r
i
CITY OF CL5RMONV
P.O. BOX 219 CLEIIMON'r, PLORIDA 32711 • ('IIONE 904/3')4 4001
July 20, 1983
Jerry McDowell
Lake County Council on Aging, Inc.
1,211 Penn Street
Leesburg, Florida 327d8
Dear Mr. McDowell:
I appreciate your concern for the Clermont area, and your assist-
ance in establishing a Senior Citizens' Center Annex for our. City.
The City Council also believes that providing additional services
for Senior Citizens is important for our City. For this reason,
they will allow the Lake County Council on Aging to utilize the
Kehler Park Recreation Building for Seniors' activities on an ex-
perimental basis for a period of one year. After a one year period
from the date of this letter, we will again evaluate the use of
this building.
As you are aware, this building is also used by the Clermont Recre-
ation Club, an existing organization composed mainly of Senior
Citizens. We believe that the activities of your organization
will complement the efforts of the Recreation Club, and we request
that you work directly with a representative of this Club to sched-
ule the use of this building.
The following guidelines are designed to insure that there are no
conflicts over the use of this building by the Council on Aging,
and must be followed:
1. Use of the building must be coordinated with the
Recreation Club on a monthly basis. The City will
be the final arbitrator of any disputes between the
Council on Aging and the Recreation Club.
2. The Council on Aging is authorized to utilize all
equipment in the building owned by the City of Cler-
mont, but may not use equipment or furniture belong-
ing to the Recreation Club without• their express
consent.
3. After each use of the building your organization
will be responsible for sweeping the floors and per-
forming any other work necessary to keep the building
in as good condition as it was found.
Page two
4. No improvements to the building may be made, or
signs erected without approval from the City.
By following the above guidelines, we will be able to coordinate
properly all activities in the Kehler Park Recreation Building
and to improve services to our Senior Citizens.
Thank you for your interest and cooperation. if you have any
questions, please feel free to contact- me.
Sincerely, ,
George D. Forbes
City Manager
GDP/mgg
REQUI::iT volt:__Varianre._____-_�__.___ _.._
DATEI:___..July
OWNER:
Chyrel Y. Boney
APPLICANT:
Same
PROPERTY:
Southwest portion of Tract 1, Oakhurst Subdivision
Legal attached.
LOCATION:
South of DeSoto Street on Anderson
ZONING:
R-1 Residential
REQUEST:
Variance to Subdivision Ordinance lot width require-
ment. Applicant requests lot width of 73.33 feet,
whereas ordinance states 75 feet are required.
COMENTS:
The applicant owns a piece of property approximately
220 x 288 feet, and wishes to divide it into three
building lots. Each lot will be 73.33 feet wide and
deep enough to contain at least 20,000 square feet.
The Subdivision Ordinance requires lots to be 75
feet wide and have an area of at least 7500 square
feet.
Sec. 20-13. Variances of the Subdivision Ordinance
reads as follows:
In the event a developer can show that strict
application of this chapter deprives him of the
reasonable use of his land and that he suffers a
hardship as defined herein and that the granting
of a variance to the chapter will not adversely
affect the essential character of the area, the
City Council may grant a variance.
Chyrel Y. Boney
Subdivision Variance
i
LEGAL
Begin on S line of Tract 1 325' W of SE corner. Run N 182.5'1
W 48', N 48.51, W 1401, S 11', W 100', S 220' to SW corner of
Tract 1, E to POB. Clermont, Oakhurst Subdivision.
TO THE ZONING BOARD 01' AWINTMENT
OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT. F )IDA
nrrLlcnNT y� /VU-
nonnrss: yc �._/_I�.tLU2s'_G.��/.:lG-rC.. er 1?� • '1'OX ;�,;
Gentlemen: LY%tmon4/ 7//
Having posted the. necessary $25.00 appeal fee with the City Clerk, I hereby make
application to your Board for relief from a decision of the Building Official of the City
of Clermont, whereby I was refused permission to:
i
Repair ( ), Add to ( ), Alter ( ), Construct. ( ), Move and Place ( ), a (sign) building
� _ onriir� rr ra%7�J
i
un lot/5 / l f Hlock
_ sir^ _ ��.GPf:'L.�.::r _ n .y._._.._...-^-� --_G�l�.�l11LGf ._1ffi%*i nly-
Subdivision. •reZw r/�,.��, AddressGcirl ._��c_/• tom �i=,Zone
Section of Code!S.L1�11_..._.._....._Jn the City of Clermont, Florida. ,
The reason given by the Building Official for the decision in refusing to issue a
building permit is:,��o�,%/oa<Qo��<�c/�f��i����d/nscl/c�`s
My appeal to your hoard is based on my contention that this decision create a
hardship on me for the following reason, or reasons: iw-/ �fi�Pinft�rcd S.Gr�J�o�
firms gico :�iGs �..r:'.�//i�ifr✓c f/�ir�wir:.,1,/ni-/.:o�i��%'i o17c zo Go7 .F
,lil.:i �r✓o ri� Z � //,`' Sq � � c� ���. C•..-.r_/ , of i:f ,:cP.B � 6r= �i.�. //f/�f�r_oiSc�
/inr_./ ed�-� Ser<Q/ ;oo �' Boa/.�q;'r•>1 ,�.•,��//'vi��i/J�:; i��,<�c .�-�i
Seven (7) copies of all necessary floor plans, plot plans, and other pertinent infor-
mation are attached hereto, on paper size D," x 14" minimum size.
4
I submit that I qualify for this variance because I have an exceptional and unique
hardship on my particular parcel of land that is not shared by property owners in my area.
A strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives me of the reasonable use of my land
and the granting of this variance will not alter the essential character of the area.
I have been notified that this Variance Application must be filed with the City Clerk
no later than 5:00 P.M. on Friday, two (2) weeks prior to the Council meeting at which time is
Variance will be considered. I also understand that when any variance is granted, construction
of the structure must be completed within one year from date of grant.
Date:_
f
Very truly yours,
5/17/77
LEGAh NOTICE
CITY Or CLER14ONT
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of. the City of i
Clermont will consider a request for a variance to .lot width
requirements for the following property:
Southwest Portion of Tract 1
Oakhurst Subdivision
This request will be considered at a Public hearing before the
City Council on Tuesday, July 26, 1983 at 7:30 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers.
All interested parties will be given an opportunity to express
their views in this matter.
Please be advised that, under State Law, if you should decide to
appeal a decision made with respect to this matter, you will need
a record of the proceedings, and may need to ensure that a verbatim
record is made.
Wayne Saunders
City Clerk
South Lake Press
July 21, 1983
I
1'
CITY OF CLERM®6\ T
P.O. OOX 210. CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711 . PHONE 004/3944001
July 10, 1983
Dear Property Owner:
As an owner of property within 150 feet of the southwest part
of Tract 1, Oakview Subdivision, you may be interested in
knowing that a variance request has been received for certain
property in this area. The request is for lots of 73.33 feet,
whereas 75 foot lots are required by the ordinance.
This request will be considered by City Council at a Public
Hearing on Tuesday, July 26, 1983 at 7:30 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers located at the corner of West Avenue and West
DeSoto Street.
You are invited to attend this meeting to express your views
on this matter. By working together we can keep Clermont an
attractive community in which to live and work.
ncerely,
Marilyn G. Gee "e
Planning and Zoning Technician
PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 150 FEET OF
SOUTHWEST PORTION OF
TRACT 1, OAX11URST SUBDIVISION
Everett Abney
Tract 1
10635 NE llth Avenue
Miami Shores FL 33100
William P. Jones
Lot 53
Shady
Nook
435 Sheldon Place
Tommy Hypos
Lot 54
Shady
Nook
437 Sheldon Place
II.E. Swearingen
Lot 55
Shady
Nook
447 Sheldon Place
William Setterich
Lots 33
& 34
Shady Nook
P.O. Box 10
Wewahitchka FL 32465
Willie D. Montgomery
Tract 1
419 East DeSoto St
Louise Lockhart
Tract 1
447 East DeSoto St
John Meadows
Tracts
2 and
3
50 Palmetto Drive
Tavares FL 32778
GA'ff: ,., Ju1Y_•,1;�„•.1.98.3._.,_ __...__.._.__._
0WIMR:
Vivienne Jan Thompson
APPLICANT:
Same
PItGPHION:
Land between Lot ]. & Lake from westerly exten-
sion of southerly line of Lot 1 to north line
of Sub - loss north 50 ft. and less south 40 ft.
LNCATtplt;
Minnchaha Shores
2248 South Lakeshore Drive
ZONING:
11-1 Single Family Residential
ttL•'QtIN.ST:
Variance from 25 foot rear yard setback re-
quirements. Addition will encroach six (0-6
feet into rear yard. The addition is to be
used for a dining room.
The owner states that her hardship is that she
MMIMEINT5:
would not be allowed to build an addition under
the present ordinance.
Whenever a new home, or addition, is built in a
flood hazard area (as this is), the surveyor must
install benchmarks at the high water and 100-year
flood elevations. Once the floor is poured it
must be certified by a surveyor or contractor as
to its exact elevation.
The City's Flood Hazard Regulations state that
the 25 foot required rear yard does not begin
until the high water mark, and the lowest floor
of the building must be at an elevation at least
18 inches above the 100-year flood elevation.
For properties on the Clermont Chain of Lakes the
high water mark is considered to be 97.5 feet.
The 100-year flood elevation is 99 feet. There-
fore the lowest floor of a building must be set
at 100 feet six inches.
PLFASF PRIw* OR TYPE p
TO THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTmair
OF THE CITY OF LERMONT FLORIDA �)
,
APPLICANT �� %^/ OL114
NAME:y�i�1.
ADDRESS: ate"
Gentlemen:
Having posted the necessary $25.00 appeal fee with the City Clerk, 1 hereby make
application to your Board for relief from a decision of the Building Official of the City
of Clermont, whereby 1 was refused permission to:
Repair ( ), Add to ( %Q, Alter ( ), Construct (A, Move and Place ( ), a (sign) building
on lot/s*j-(nG(nMp ai'l"" & Block
Subdivision_aj�j�LtCOALI&SIaW, Addresst�-
Section of Code26-16 Measurement of Yard Setbacks in the City of Clermont, Florida.
The reason given by the Building Official for the decision in refusing to issue a
building permit is: Ndw a 0p;-K7- wou4,( Fig of W 11"/ info
&1& SFr &4ke , proposed addition will penetrate six (6) feet
into the required twenty-five (25) foot rear yard and also the
twenty-five foot flood hazard requirement of the established high
water mark.
My appeal to your Board is based' on my contention that this decision creates a
hardship on me for the following reason, or reasons: toI
ST L✓bf/Lo 0.or f}LL.7rJ Av- rig ue,6 ann o+�i•�+1►•..
-tAe PrCSCN% Or4,"1A-t tom' .
Seven (7) copies of all necessary floor plans, plot plans, and other pertinent infor-
mation are attached hereto, on paper size 0," x 14" minimum size.
I submit that 1 qualify for this variance because I have an exceptional and unique
hardship on my particular parcel of land that is not shared by property owners in my area.
A strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives me of the reasonable use of my land
and the granting of this variance will not alter the essential character of the area.
I have been notified that this Variance Application must be filed with the City Clerk
no later than 5:00 P.M. on Friday, two (2) weeks prior to the Council meeting at which time
Variance will be considered. I also understand that when any variance is granted, constructim
of the st7//
ture must be completed within one year from date of grant.
Date: '3
Very truly yours,
5/17/77 1.
ATTACHMENT "A"
viv&onne J. ThomDcon
2248 S. Lake Shore Drive `a�. t3c"Y 56•9
Clermont, Florida 32711
LAND n,illn LOT 1 & LAKE rRO'1!T,T,YEEXTSS O r3'T,YF,
LINE Or LOT 1 TO N LINE Ol' �
LESS S'LY 40 FT
MINNEHAHA SHORES
FI-113
163.('0' $652.00
61inn to:
From:
Subject:
1'umax),a:
VarianIX` Apt)] ieantn
c!il:y manager.
V,utiance Stanclu•d,
this mn mp ::a, an•ittcn to assist Clernont Citizens in
underotandinq the tnmrtom of zoning vari.allws and
thu spec:ir'ic cim-motanco, ill which tin: City Council
c;m grant varianu�s.
4fien nminq wn:; first ez�nel ivrd, citizens and lawyers were mnccrned al,out
tile difticulty of writing qunc�t:,Il rule.:; over land use. that onul.ct be exalIA
cable to innemi erable pines:; nl' ptul erLy. '1'hure. would I.ee rasa., for a::amnq�le,
where a gonnrat side yard re,IuircnCnt: would be a tardslu.p on a few lots that
o ry)l am••h.,•truL wrtlm LAW paLtorn.
Fur thin. reason, the varinnrr w.I:; includod in Thu Zoning ordinancc as a
dovim to al.lwialk muGainw:;:; in Particular cases.
Ccit4l)III1.10NI; 'J11A'L' MUST BE MET:
'tile mncrlmt of a variancxt w&; rn .'Or intended to be away of relaxing zoning
rexlulatinns on a wholesale fashion. In order to authorize any variance frcrn
the city's Zoni:xj Ordimince, the City Council nnast find the following:
1. '11>�t s�xcial condition. or circcmutances exist which are peculiar
W our ]told, stnicLiieu, or building which are not applia�ble to
- y ----
other properties in your zominq district.
Ibis would include toixxiraphic features,ouodd rtnast 5lhnAJ fl itlots,
the strcte
restuircments, etc. In other words, y
application of the 'lonimg ordinance produces a unique or unnc:ces-
sary hvirciship in regmrd to your. ro rt� that is not applicable
to other properties.
2. 'ill- hardshi must not Ix, self created. IScamples of a self created
_E-r ...
ivirdlap would inclu.lu IWvi.nq to build an extra garage because you
bought another cat; o,_ enrlarging your hone h.e`Canse Your mother-in-
law is mining to live with you.
3. The City Council cannot grant a zoning variance to You that will
grant You a npcuiai L)rivilec e wlu.ch is denied to other property
owners in tile_ sane zonmq district.
This might include 1,11ILitting the erection or operation of a busi-
ness that would otherwise not be permitted by time Zoning ordinance.
For exaWle, allowing a shopping center to be built in a residen-
tial zone. This Would require rezoning the property because the
City Council cannot by a variance change the basic zoning classi-
fication.
4. In order to obtain a variance you must dermnstrate that a literal
interpretation of Ulu voldlty ordinance would deprivo you of r>9l ts_
ccmronly enjoyed bry other properties in the sure zoning district,
and cause an umnecassary and undue hardship for you.
f
hige -2-
hS lin to: varlanco Appl i::rmtn
Subject: varinncc standards,
If yuu (mined a sln�,ily 101. Ihat• was platted many years ago
and cVr-s not now mot I)p lot width ruquirownts of tlu:
Zoning ordinance; yuu Imly have a situation where a literal
interpretation of: our Zoning ordinance would cdepriv0 you of
the use of your Jot. Ibis is a right enjoyed by other ad-
joininJ prcport:icn ancd mould result in an unrhda hardship.
Ik1dOvert ecanamic cdi.njdvantage alone does, not conntitut0 a
headship Nit Nit: do warrant air ntl.ixi a var ancr A person
wanLing a land area vU11Tmcc fcir a fourple; IxciCtiix he can t
nf.Corrl to buy onouglt p:qrrty (Iono, not have nuff:ich:nt
grounds for a varinnxl.
5. any variance that i❑ granted nnL:t 1.o the minimtun variance to
icr 1x),siblc 'he reasonable use of: yourpr2ixrty_:n�e� bens,
iiim wltdn Cho µrural inb nt. of the Milinq ordinance.
WNCT US M:
If; you Naicve that your rceltu;t for a zoning variance nrt s the above
five conditions; feel free to cca:gtlete the attached application folms.
Please rermmbor that you must cdenviotrate to tho City Council, acting
as the Zoninq [laird of Adjuntnunt-, that, your variant. rcrp -st :nets
the above conditions tx:fory your request can Ix: granted.
i .. _. _ Ir fl. j�....._.-�; p�
Sfi,�
�' 1
I �
z- � � r
� � i `�-,�
'��
�--
I —JAL, NOTICE
CITY OF CLERMONT
'goticu is hereby given that the City COL"lc:l.l. of the City Of
Clermont will consider a request• f:or a variance to rear yard
setback rayu:i.rcu;unts for the fol..l.owtny property:
2248 South Lakeshore Urivc
This request will be con:;idered at it lwl,lic hearing before the
city Council on 'Pucsclay, July 26, ].98'] at 7:30 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers located at 882 West- DOSOtO Street.
ell interested parties will be given an opportunity to express
their dews on this matter.
Please be advised that, under State Law, if you should decide to
appeal a decision made with respect to this matter, you will need
a record of the proceedings, and may need to ensure that a verbatim
record is made.
Wayne Saunders
City Clerk
South Lake Dress
:July 21, 3.983
CITY OF CLER910g®6! T
P.O. BOX 210 • CLERMONT, FLORIDA 32711 . PIIDNF 004/304
j
i
P
4..
July 18, 1983
c
Dear Property Owner:
As an owner of property within 150 feet of 2248 South Lakeshore
Drive, you may be interested to know that a variance has been
requested for this property. The owner wishes to build an addi-
tion to the rear of the house, and this addition will extend
into the required rear yard setback by six (6) feet.
This request will be considered by the City Council at.a Public
Hearing on Tuesday, July 26, 1983 at 7:30 p.m. in the city Coun-
cil Chambers located at the corner of West Avenue and West DeSoto
Street.
You are invited to attend this meeting to express your views
on this matter. By working together we can keep Cermont an at-
tractive community in which to live and work.
sincerely,
C G
Marilyn G.* eorge
Planning and Zoning Technician
PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 150 FEET Or
2248 SOUTH LAKESHORE DR.
Lot 1, Block 5, Minnehaha
Chain of Lakes
Metes and Bounds
Frank L. Caldwell'
2235 South Lakeshore Drive
A.E. Langley
6088 Masters Blvd.
Orlando 32811
James G. Stearns
2251 South Lakeshore Drive
7GUCQDNAAtnD 11. HAKIM, Jgt.
ATTOI,NGT AT LAW
notlr orrice onAWr.O lootl
/'1.N It DI /INT, V/./IIt1UA 11L711
rrtu nnonern. IA
luo.l ,n..+•en.
nemennen unren.e nn.r, i
wn[n, eeures Arm enure nuunnm
July 26, 1983
Mr. Goorge Forbes
City Manager, City of Clermont
1 Westgate Plaza
Clermont, Florida 32711
RE: INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND
Dear George:
Pursuant to request by the City Council, I have reviewed the request by Mr. Herb
Rodgers of Lake Highlands Retirement and Nursing Center, Inc., for the issuance
of $2,900.000.00 in industrial revenue bonds. Particular attention was paid to
the issue of the legal ramifications to the city.
In connection with my research, I spoke with the County Attorneys Office, officials
from Barnett- Bank and bond counsel. Additionally, I reviewed the Florida Constitution,
the Florida Statutes, recent case decisions and general legal literature on industrial
revenue bonds.
Industrial revenue bonds are authorized by the Florida Constitution and by chapter 159,
Florida Statutes. The procedures for issuing the bonds are clearly outlined in
the statutes. Basically, they involve the following:
1. The city determines if the project will be beneficial to the economic
growth of the community, provide for employment, public health or general
welfare. Bond counsel in Jacksonville has made a determination. that this
project meets this requirement.
2. The city determines if the borrower has the financial capability to repay
the loan. Barnett Bank has apparently made this determination because it is
loaning the money. The council should probably request a statement from Barnett
Bank, either in the minutes or by letter, that the borrower does in fact meet
this requirement.
3. The city must be able to handle the project in terms of public facilities.,;
The council should probably consult with the city staff regarding this requirement.
In the event the city determines the above criteria have been met, the city then issues
the bonds. The bonds will be purchased by Barnett Bank and the city then loans the
money to the borrower. The money is disbursed by a trustee (Barnett Bank Trust Dept.).
All of the documents of sale and purchase, security interests, pledges of .revenue and s.
loan agreements will be prepared by bond counsel at no cost to the city. All expenses
are paid by the borrower.
July 20, 1983
Mr. George Forbes
City Manager, City of Clermont
Page 2
The Florida Constitution, the Florida Statutes and case decisions all provide that
there will be no liability to the city in the event of a default by the borrower.
All of the financing documents also contain this provision and bond counsel will
issue its legal opinion that there in no liability to the city. In the event of
a default, Barnett Bank will. look solely to the project for payment, not to the
city.
In conclusion, it is my opinion that there are no legal ramifications to the city
in this matter. It appears that the city is simply a "flowthrough" in effecting
financing for projects that will serve a community need.
Very truly yours, /
LEONARD H. BAIRD, JR.
LHB/kgc
WAI:f M M. M(I.IN, 111
It. DI:N'1:Y IIIINNNID
STANf.1:1• 9. MARLIA'.
11111M A. TIMMINON
STENIIGN W. aouNNON July 25, 1983
DON 11. 111110(IS
Mr. George Forbes
City Manager
City of Clermont
Post Office Box 219
Clermont, Florida 32711
Re: .Cl PAL
Dear George:
i�
RECEIVED JUL 2 6 1983
McLxN, 1bjitNstn), MAUA171,1; K DIo11rr��oT
1�11(11'lIMN1ONAf, ANH(1(:I A'1'1 (>N
AvrousI;YH AND COIINHIt I.011H AT LAW
I (I (ID wHHT MAIN HTu11NT
I . I:I:HIIIIR(1, III,0111DA 327.&U-1157 PLI:nNl: 111:1'IA'1'0:
I'UN'1' Ol rlCl: DIIAWI:B 10n7
AIIXA CO)I: 004
'I'I•.1.1:1'IIONI: 7117- IQ•11
I am enclosing a copy of a letter from William H. Stone, an
attorney in Clermont who now represents the Weber Trust. Basically,
his clients are offering only to clean up the outside of the -
building, clean out combustible material inside of the building
and keep the lawn mowed. Also they say they will keep the windows
and doors boarded up to keep out transients.
Beyond that, it appears the Trust is not willing to commit itself
to do anything to remedy the problems with the Clermont Hotel. I
submit this to you as the apparent offer of the Trust in the
negotiations into which we were authorized by the City Council to
enter. However, it certainly does not fulfill the intent of the
council, and would at best maintain the status quo of the building
indefinitely, something which would be totally unacceptable. I
suppose this should be submitted to the Council for comment, but
it is not what I had hoped for.
Therefore, as directed by the Council we will continue to proceed
with the lawsuit against Mr. Buttitta. At some point, it seems it
would be incumbent on the trust to intervene in that litigation in
order to protect its interests, since if we win the hearing coming
up in early August, the only step left will be the entry of a final
judgment based on the default against Mr. Buttitta. At that point,
Mr. Buttitta would have thirty days within which to begin renova—
tion or demolition of the building. After that, the City could
approach the Bankruptcy Court in Orlando for permission to
implement the remainder of the judgment, which would allow the
City to tear the building down and charge the cost of it as a lien
on the property.
Mr. George Forbes
City Manager
City of Clermont
Page Two
July 25, 1983
Please let me know the feeling of the Council on this, and I will
in turn convey that feeling to Mr. Stone on behalf of the Trust.
In the meantime, we will pursue the litigation against Mr.
Buttitta as directed.
Yours truly,
✓%�
FRED AO/RRISON
FAM:klo
enclosure
DiCLIN, 131JUNH111), MARA111,11 Li INUMIUSON
111101111NNIONAI. AHH11Ci A',i11N
A,rro IINIIYH AND COIINH II LDIIH AT 1.Aw
I I,, Wiwi. MAIN H'I'ID1119'
LIM141111110, F1,0111DA .12740-I'177 rIXANII MINN 10:
IIIIIII011111CH 1111AN'111t 10.17
D, 1i 1111'll\' 1111ItNNtIO AIIIIA C0111i !)(,-I
STANIXY U. kIA11,\111.11 "I'1:1.111''ll (1 N 1: 711]•IL•.11
11IM11 A. 190011I.-N
KI'111'1111N 1v, .IOIINNON July 25, 1983
DON 11. IIIt10t1N
William H. Stone, Esquire
Post Office Drawer 520
Clermont, Florida 32711
Re: Clermont 112tgl
Dear Bill:
I have received your letter regarding the Clermont Hotel, and have
forwarded it to the City for consideration by the council. Given
- the comments during the last meeting I attended there, I would
anticipate the City rejecting your short term proposal.
You speak of the dispute between the City and Mr. Buttitta, and of
your solution as being an interim remedy pending resolution of
that particular dispute. Actually, the dispute of the City is
with the building itself, and that dispute, whether it be with the
[Veber Trust, Mr. Buttitta or anyone else, will not be resolved
until one of two things happens. Either the building will have to
be destroyed, or someone will have to go in and remedy all the
code violations in the building, and convert it to a use which is
compatible with the current zoning of the property and which
complies with all the codes which are now being violated. As I
told Councilman pool during the last meeting at which I addressed
this subject, there is no law against a vacant building per ju.',
but it appears that so long as this building stands vacant as it
currently does, it will act as a magnet to transients, who will
continue to break into the building to sleep or do .whatever it is
transients do in vacant buildings. This,, in turn, constitutes a
hazard to the surrounding community by virtue of the possibility
of increased crime from the transient population, as well as the
risk of fire in the building which could spread to surrounding
houses and structures.
I will certainly let you know what the City Council decides, as
soon as I hear from George Forbes concerning their comments on
your proposal. In the meantime, we have been directed by the
i
William H. Stone, Cayuira
July 25, 1903
Page Two
Council to proceed with our lawsuit against Mr. Ruttitta, and for
the present time that is what we will be doing. I will keep you
advised of the progress in that suit, so you will be in a position
to advise your clients concerning what action, they may want to
take regarding it.
Yours
l truly,
�K
�RGD A. MORRISON
PAM:klo
WILLIAm H. STONE
ATTOMMY AT LAW
]n11 IA nrl,anA r. n11:C1
G� F."MONT, FLmnIOA 3n711
n n. dI1nW1:11 tlDd I -' e11UIlC IDndl ]51�•�UUD
,Iuly 1.9, 1981
Fred A. florrinon, Esquire
McLin, Burnned, MarabIt! h MorrInoo
P. 0. Drawer 1.357
I,eesburg, Fla. 32749-1.357 ..
Re: Clermont Hotel.
Dear Fred,
As you are apparently aware, T hnve been retained to represent
Richard W. t'lober, 'rrustect with respect to his :interest and involve-
ment in die above -referenced matter. I have reviewed with my
client the documentation that you enclosed in your letter of .Ial.y
8, 1.983, including the memn from Mr. Smythe, the Director of Public
Works to Mr. ButtiCta, dated September 8, 1980; the memo from
the Fire Chief to the City Manager, dated October 16, 1980,-and -the -- - --
inspection report prepared by the Division of Hotels and Rastnurants
of the Department of Business Regulations of the State of Florida on
October 1.6, 1980,.all. of which were examined in the context or I:he
other enclosure, Section 202.2 of the Code of Ordinances of the
city of Clermont, pertaining to the Standard Code For The Elimination
Or Repair Of Unsafe Buildings. Bnticd upon the defects and requirements
delineated in the above -referenced enclosures, my client has agreed
to immediately assume possession of the premises, secure any open
doors or windows, remove any accumulation of debris or other
combustible material from the attic and basement, remove anyaccumulation
of debris or rubbish from the exterior. of the building, and
mc
the
prem:Lses. idy c.LienC has Purt:her agreed to continue these snfegunrcling
measures unCi.1. such time as the dispute and relationship between the city and
Mr. Buttitta has been resolved.
Your letter also made some reference to my client's intended use of the
building ,once* it is back in their. hands". Since we are not parties
to the present litigation, I fail to see how it is going to be places]
"back in our hands" unless it is through some form of receivership
capacity such as we ]lave suggested above, sol.e.l.y for the purpose of
July 19, 198:1
Fred A. Morrison, I'aqulre
Fnge Two
fin fcgunrdLill, Live premises until the disputo hetween the City and Mr.
Iitit tiLLa Ls finn1,1y resolved. As for ns any .long term prospects nro
concerned, my cllonLs have not at Lhis pnlnt thoroughly evnluated their
❑iternatives except to indicate thnt we do intend to protect our
mortgage interest in the prendses ;md do not in Lend to permLt our
security to be razed in col luncti.on with n rhtnicl.pnl l'I.rc Deportment
fire drill unless the My or Mr. ButLittn comes forth with sufficient
funds to satisfy the outstanding bniance on our mortgnlle.
if you o, the CiLy would be w1lling to pursue our uhurt term m intion,
please advvLse and Mr. Weber and 'I: will be more thin glad to meet with
you and the appropriate representnLi.ves of the C[Ly of Clermont at
Your convenience.
Thank you in advance for your continued consideration in this regard.
Yours very ,truly,
WILLIAM 11. STONE -
MIS :mam
cc: Richard W. Weber, 'Trustee
c/o Leonard 11. Baird, Jr.., Esquire