Loading...
09-09-1982 Supporting DocumentsSPCCIAL M9I-PIPIG 6nptambnr.r9r.1002r , A SPec1.a1 Mooting of tiro City Connell of 1ho City of Clermont was held at 700 11 9, 1962 in Clte C1.Cy (founeil. Chnmbern, the t•tocf:inq wan called Uo order at 7 andL) Pool pill` Iby l'urvf.l].r Ilooklir�roC'1ty10CCi1:1c1u1n1pronunt(werr;llm`r'fynlaanagerrAPorben,oCity Atlornoyl Baird, Ni.nance Director. Saunders, and Deputy (:'lty Clerk Brandt. The Invocallon was offored by City Mtulager Forbes, followed by repeating the Pledge of A1lcgiauce by all present. MIC1U'1'ES A motion was made by Councilman Turville, seconded by Councilman Pool and unanimously carried that the minuL•ns of the August 24, 1982 ftegul.ar: Meeting he approved as presented. Mayor ioskinson stated that since this Is a Special MocL-i.nq for L-Ciile y Manager the regular ordetsoandutl enctwewwould c'go onto the Budget �tBearited ln . the City Manager had a few CITY MA_._ AIAGEW S If -PORT WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS ct 112 City Manager Forbes regehLLCouni Change ThisrChange order 45 to aincreasles tiles net ump Statiod'be approved by a for final As -Built price of the Contract by $1,978.50 and .is necessary to Pay quantities. lie stated that the City is planning on closing out the Water System Improvements Project on Tuesday, September 21, 1962. City Attorney Baird requested that all Council Members be prepared to attend the Bond Closing. 62-133 at 2:00 p.m., September 21, 1962 in his office. A MOTION WAS MADE DY COUNCILMAN TMAN POOL, AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED THAT CHANGE ORDER URVILLE, SECONDED BY COUNCIL . H5 TO CONTRACT 112 BE APPROVED. UTILITY LINE RELOCATION f1IG11WAY 50 nvoice city Manager Forbes explained that they have received the froyedinal lby the City the relocation of utility lines on Highwa�he0finalhcost ofwas thisproject of Council. Ile requested permission to pay approved b Utility Director $36,946.16. This project has been completed aS and BY COUNCILMAN TURVILLE I! 82-134 Davis. A MOTION WAS MADE DY COUNCILMAN POOL, AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED TO MAKE THE FINAL PAYMENT 01' $36,996.16. WORKSHOP MEETING WITH LIBRARY BOARD Board has requested a Workshop Meeting It was explained that that the library with the Council. After much discussion, the Council requested that this meeting be Council sat discussOtile mCounty oLibrary, September 13, 1982. RESIGNATION OF COUNCILMAN THOMAS Mayor Hoskinson informed the Council of Mr. Thomas' resignation and requested all Councilmen to be prepared to discuss the filling of this vacancy at the next Council Meeting. ADOPTION OF TENTATIVE MILLAGE RATE - Mayor Hoskinson explained the order of business for the budget hearing. lie must first discuss the percentage millage increase over stated that the City the roll -back rate necessary to fund the budget and the specific purposes which ad valorem tax revenues are being increased. The Mayor stated the ad valorem tax,rate is tieing.decreased'from a rate of 3.456 mills (last year's lie requested any public comments on this millage rate, rate) to 2.793 mills. and John Fleming asked if the City's millage rate had been rolled back further ated that 'than the back furthertthan'requiredaby State-L. Mayor awnot been rolled kinHenexnlained that ttledma3OrLty of other `sales , rtheanies was bcing',placed in,=. the Utility :Furid to insure that the 'City:, r " , 82 135 could hold down Utility rated as. on as, possible A,M(7tI0N;WAS MAD1 BY COUNCIL ; MAN oOOL,.$ECONDCD;:By COUNCILMAN TURVILLEt AND UNANZMOOSLY,(;ARRICC TO ESTABLISI�p(r`�7 .k� v...,. .. .. .., ,. .. .1 . ,,. � t 1, .-ser•I��i�� SPECIAL METING Supteml;r.r A, 7982 Pagn -1- !I'IIE CITY'S TENTATIVE MILLAGE RAIT, AT 2,793 MILLS. RESOLUTION NO. 406 - TE31TATIVG GIINRHAI:, I•'0111 AND RI•;VGIIJIIE SII�HfIpI(^BIIUCyl3'1' MayorHonkinnon cxp.iai.nod that the Ganoral Fund of l:he City provi.dos . monies for all of: the City'u operati.on:a with the uxcepti.ou of water, newer, and sani.tation sorvicot:. Ile roqucntad that the City Council ` con:;lder. amending Renol.ution Ile. 406 to hic.lude: .1. Increasi.ng salaries in fire protection by $1,138 bec;.tune of a higher rate in fire calls. 2. The addition of $975 to finance installation of a Public Address System for the council Chambers. 3. Decreasing the projected revenues for Revenue Sharing by $7,058 and increasing General Fund Street Lighting by the same amount. He explained that this was necessary because the Federal Govornmant's estimate to the City reduced the - amount of avai.lablo funds flue to an increase in per capita income. councilman Hal Turville requested that the Council consider further amending the General Fund Budget. Ile stated that lie did not believe the City should place $lOoo in the Budget for a donation to the Art League because either the League was unwilling or unable to solicite funds for themselves. He dial not believe that the Clermont public would want this contribution in our budget. Mayor Hoskinson stated that he felt the contribution to the Art League was hart of cultural activities like Jenkins Auditorium. ❑e stated that the City also gives money to the Chamber of Commerce which benefits our community like the Art League. Mayor Hoskinson further stated that the contribution was as important as handball courts, which are .in the-City's budget; both were community services. John Fleming spoke up at this point, and stated that he did not believe that the City should support the Art 82-136 League. After much discussion, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN TURVILLE, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN POOL AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED BY ROLL CALL VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 406 WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: 1. Increase salaries in Fire Protection by $1,138. 2. Increase Capital Outlay by $975 for a Public Address System in the Council Chambers. 3. Reduce projected revenues in Revenue Sharing by $7,058 and increase the General Fund Street Lighting by the same amount. 4. Delete $1000 donation to the Art League under Special Activities, and place the money in the Recreation and Youth Programs Account. (Specific requests from the Art League could be considered under this account). - VOTING WAS AS FOLLOWS: COUNCILMAN POOL, AYE; COUNCILMAN TURVILLE, AYE; AND 'MAYOR HOSKINSON, AYE. THE RESOLUTION WAS READ BY TITLE ONLY. RESOLUTION NO. 407 - TENTATIVE UTILITY FUND BUDGET Mayor Hoskinson explained that the Utility Fund Budget is necessary to finance the water and sewer services of the City. Fie asked for public comments on this budget and John Fleming asked what the reserves in this fund would be used for. It was explained that the City's added bonded indebtedness in the next .two years would cause the fund to lose money by next year and the reserves in this fund would be used to keep utility rates as low as possible for as long as possible. 82-137 A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN TURVILLE, SECONDED BY COUNCILMA14 POOL AND UNAN- IMOUSLY CARRIED BY ROLL CALL VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION No. 407. THE VOTING WAS AS FOLLOWS: COUNCILMAN TURVILLE, AYE; COUNCILMAN POOL, AYE; AND MAYOR HOSKINSON, AYE. THE RESOLUTION WAS READ BY TITLE ONLY. ,., SPECIAL, MEETING Septomber 9, 1982 Page -3- RESOLUTION 110, 405 -I'I':NTNI'LVPSANVI'A'TI0II_FUMD BUDGET Mayor Honkinnon explained that Cho Sanitation Fund nudgnt was nocessary to run Chu Ci.ty'n sanitation sorvi.cen. It wan explained that the City i.r.; concerned of a ponnible Increann in costs of this service due to the closing of the present landfilloperation within the next year. Public coimnent-u were received and John Fleming stated that the C.ity's Resolution showed the City had a deficit of $20,537 and inquired if the City could pass a Resolution which showed an unbalanced budget. City Manager Forbes explained that the $20,537 figure did show a net loss in the Sanitation Fund, however, this was not an unbalanced budget because the Sanitation 82-138 Fund had enough monies to cover the loss. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN POOL, SECONDED fly COUNCILMAN 'TURVILLE AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED BY ROLL CALL VOTE THAT RESOLUTION NO. 405 BE ADOPTED WITB THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENT: THAT THE BUDGET RESOLUTION WOULD SHOW A FUND BALANCE. THE VOTING WAS AS FOLLOWS: COUNCILMAN TURVILLE, AYE; COUNCILMAN POOL, AYE{ AND MAYOR IIOSKINSON, AYE. THE RESOLUTION WAS READ BY TITLE ONLY. REPORT ON CITY RADIO SYSTEM Mayor Noskinson discussed the City's present radio system and the work that hac been Anne in order to obtain a new radio system which will place the Police Department and other City Departments on separate.. frequencies. IIe stated that the City Manager would obtain quotes from the two companies which make this equipment, and report back to the Council at the September 28, 1982 Council Meeting. The Meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. ',/J.M. Hoskinson, Mayor ATTEST: g�i.caru.C� Julth M. Brandt, Deputy City Clerk Memo to: City Council From: City Manager Subject: Weekly Memo Date: September 3, 1982 THURSDAY'S SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING. The next meeting of the City Council will be held this Thursday, September 9, 1982 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. The purpose of this meeting I s to a opt a tentative General,. Revenue Sharing, Utility and Sanitation Budgets of the City. At this hearing, the City must first discuss the percentage millage increase over the roll back rate necessary to fund the budget, and the specific purposes for which ad valorem tax revenues are being increased. (Since the ad valorem taxes are being decreased, this is not an issue). During this discussion, we must allow the general public to speak and ask any questions which they might have; prior to the adoption of our Budget Resolutions. The attached Form DR 420proposes that the City decrease its millage rate from 3.456 (last year's rate) to 2.793. This figure is less than the roll back rate and reflects a substantial property tax reduction due to the Sales Tax. The enclosed Budget Resolutions reflect the decisions made by the Council at our Work- shops: If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. GENERAL FUND BUDGET CHANGES The City Council may wish to consider amending the proposed budget at Thursday's Meeting. Please consider the following: 1. Increasing the salaries in Fire Protection by $1,138. This may be necessary due to the increase in fire calls which we are experiencing. 2. The installation of a PA System for the Council Chambers. The estimated cost of such a system is $975 and Finance Director Saunders will give a report on this at the meeting. Mayor Hoskinson requested that the City Staff investigate the possibility of installing the PA System. 3. Reduce the projected revenues for Revenue Sharing by $7,058 and increase the cash carryover and General Fund street lighting by the same amount. This is necessary because the recent estimates from the Federal Govern- ment project a decrease in Revenue Sharing Funds. This drop was caused by U.S. Census Bureau reports on increases in Clermont's per capita in- come; which is one of the numerous factors included in the complex rev- enue formula. An increase -in per capita income negatively affects the City's share of dollars. RADIO SYSTEM. At our last Budget Workshop, the Council directed Mayor Hoskinson and me to investigate and report back to the Council the possibility of installing the Police Department on a separate radio frequency. Enclosed is a cost estimate for this work. We will give a complete report on this matter at Thursday's Council Meeting. Page -2- Weekly Memo September 3, 1982 RESIGNATION OF COUNCILMAN THOMAS. Enclosed is a copy of Mr. Thomas' resignation, He has accepted a position with a medical supply company which requires him to move to South Carolina. The City Council may appoint a citizen to fill the seat unitl the December election. Section 11(c) of the City Charter states that: (c) Filling of vacancies. (1) If a vacancy for Seats 1,2,4 or 5 occurs within a six-month period prior to a general election, the Council shall appoint a qualified person to fill the vacancy until the general election at which time the seat will be up for election. The Council should also appoint a member to serve as the library liaison and Mayor Pro Tem. Council direction is requested on this matter. CITY COUNCIL ELECTIONS. The City's Elections are always held on the first Tuesday of December. This year's election will take place on December 7, 1982. The last day to qualify for the election is Monday, November 22, 1982. We will be advertising the election and allowing candidates to qualify in November. Due to Mr. Thomas' res- ignation, there will be four positions on the City Council up for election. FIRE DEPARTMENT. During the month of August, the Fire Department responded to six alarms. They were: 1 - Structural Fire 1 - Rescue Boat (Report was on a capsized boat, but was only a clump of weeds) 1 - Med-Evac Helicopter Standby 1 - Gas Leak 1 - Grass Fire 1 - False Alarm BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORTS. Three permits were issued for new construction in the month of August and 23 permits were issued for additions and repairs. Fifty-four permits of all types were issued with a valuation of $195,091. (See attached report). FLORIDA PERSONAL INCOME AND COUNTY POPULATION PROJECTIONS. Enclosed is a newsletter from the Regional Planning Council with projections on Lake County's population and personal income. LANDSPREADING PROPERTY. The City Engineer and I have discussed the possibility of closing on the Inland Groves' property on September 13, 1982 as discussed at our last Council Meeting. I do not think that we can obtain DER approval by the 13th. I will be reporting back to the Council on rescheduling the closing date for October. WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS. Final closing on our FmHA Water System Improvements Project s scheduled for Tues ay, October 21, 1982. Enclosed is Change Order No. 5 which is necessary to allow the City to complete Contract No. 2. (Contract No. 2 was the in- stallation of our new 1,500 g.p.m. well, pumping station, and telemetering system which has been completed by the firm of Mechanical and Chemical). RELOCATION OF UTILITIES ON HIGHWAY 50. We have received the final invoice for the City's Page -3- Weekly Memo September 3, 1982 Relocation of Utilities on Highway 50 which was approved by the City Council. Our Engineer's original estimate for this work was $351337.62 based on projected unit prices. Since some additional materials were necessary, due mainly to the relocation of other utilities, the final cost of this project was $36,946.16. (See attached invoice). Council approval is requested on this matter. The work has been approved as complete by Utility Director Davis. LAKE WATER AUTHORITY. The next meeting of the Water Authority will be held on Wed- nesday, Septem er 8, 1982 at 3:00 p.m. on the fourth floor of the old courthouse in Tavares. Reports on the Upper Palatlakaha Basin Water Study and the South Lake Water Association are on the agenda. Respectfully, CITY OF CLERMONT GEORGE D. FORBES City Manager GDF/jmb _ Encl. 0 ®1 Now 5/02 CERTIFICATION OF MAXIMUM MILLAGE UNDER 42W.085, F,S, LAKE-_ _ _.._..__—___ _ _ County, Florldit TO;__ (Name of Taxing Authority) SECTION "A" (1) Current Year Gross Taxable Value: (Lino (4) From DR•420-Part 1) $ 3,3631 _ por$t,000 (2) Current Year Aggregate Rollod-Back Palo: - (Soo Taxing Authority's Instruction 0 on reverse side) FOR MUNICIPALITIES EXERCISING THE OPTION UNDER 11200.085(1)(d)1, F.S. AS CREATED BY SECTION 18 OF HOUSE BILL 2•D, PASSED BY THE 1082 LEGISLATURE, THE POLLED -BACK RATE IS THE MAXIMUM MILLAGE. $ 262,716.03 - (3) Current Year Aggregate "Rolled -Back Taxes": (1) • (2) — (4) 95 % Official Estimated Sales Tax Proceeds: $ (Do not include moneys under §212.90. F.S.) 44,512.00 (5) Mandatory Sales Tax For Tax RolleL (4) x A $ 21 —"-` $ 218,204.03 _ (6) Current Year "Tax Reduction Taxes": (3) - (5) $ 2.7932 Per $1,000 (7) Current Year Aggregate Tax Reduction Rate (6)/(11 253,279.52 - (8) Prior Year Taxi Aggregate Authority's Ad Valorem alorem Pr B end $ - - - __-- (Seereverse side) '-'-' _ 37,991.93 (9) Authorized Growth in Revenues: (8) x .15 $---------- $ 66,768.00 -- (10) Balance of Sales Tax: (4) ..6 (28,776.07) (11) Allowed Additional Growth in Revenues: (9) - (101 $ -- - - - IF LINE If 1) IS A NEGATIVE NUMBER PROCEED TO LINE (W). THE TAX REDUCTION RATE SHOWN ON LINE (7) IS THE MAXIMUM NON -VOTED MILLAGE. (12) If line 01) is a Positive Number, Add it to Lino (6): (6) r (11) $ $_._ .-_ (13) Tentative Aggregate Maximum Millago: (12)/(1) Par $1,000 ---- IF LINE (13) IS LESS THAN LINE (2). THE RATE SHOWN ON LINE (13) IS THE MAXIMUM NON -VOTED MILLAGE. IF LINE (13) IS GREATER THAN LINE (2). THE ROLLED -BACK RATE SHOWN ON LINE (2) IS THE MAXIMUM NON -VOTED MILLAGE. 2.7932 (14) Indicate The Aggregate Maximum Wilage Under §200.085, F.S. $ __..-__-__ Per $1,000 1 do hereby certify the values shown on lines (1), (4) and (16) to be correct to the bost of my knowledge and bolieL Witness my hand and official signature at .__. ..-TDVaI'e5.. Florida, this the 1st day of July. , 19 82 ' Property SECTION SECTION 212.86(4), F.S.. AS CREATED BY HOUSE BILL 2•D, REQUIRES THAT THE PROPOSED MILLAGE SHALL REFLECT ANY REDUCTION IN PROPERTY TAXES AFFORDED BY CERTIFIED TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISER THE HALF CENT SALES TAX: 318,567.17 (15) Proposed Aggregate Ad Valorem and Sales Tax Budget Amount $ (See Instruction B): (16) Amount of Sales Tax Anticipated: (Line (4) from above plus moneys received due to §212.90. if applicable) 207,287.17 (17) Proposed Net Amount (15) - (16): 4.2927 (18) Aggregate Millage "Rate Without Sales Tax" (15)/'(.95)(1): S per $1,000 (19) Proposed Aggregate Millage (17)/'(.95)(1): $ 2.7932 per $1,000 _- - I do hereby certify the) millages shown herein to be correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Witness my hand and official r day Y �i, ,c st nature at n 1r_---....---_---- _.,Florida, this the of ; , JQW J LrX—�17/ 19 a.. __ - /l/ it.rnr i ii . F'• , l %QI v - Chlef Operating Officer �+— SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE BIDE - Telephone Number .420,PAnT 1 IN 82 rood 6102 CERTIFICATION 01; TAXABLE VALUE INCLUDING STATEMENT OF ADDITIONS AND DEIX11ONS LAKE.._—.. _..—.... .._County, Florida __ .... __.._. (Name of Td.wg Authenlyl (1) Current Year Taxable Value of Real Property for Operatng Purposus (2) Current Year Taxnblp Value of Personal Property for Operating Purposes (3) Curren YeaTaaxTaxable Value of Centrally Assessed Properly lot rrgPurposes (4) Current Year Gross Taxable Value (1) r (2) (5) Current Year Funded Increase In The School Homestead Exemption (1195.031(3)(dj. F.S.) )Type in Zero (a) for School Required Local Effort and Capital Outlay Levies and all Non -School Levies) (6) Current Year Effective Taxabla Value (4) t (5) (7) Loss: Curran[ Year New Construction, Additions to $ ...2,806,470 Structures, and Annexations (a) Current Year Dulabons ($ 0 ) (9) Not New Value (7) " (9) 10) Current Year Adjusted Taxable Value (6) - (9) 11) Prior Year Gross Taxable Value $ 72,346,714... 12) Prior Year Funded Inventory Differential g (1i193.511. F.S I (Prior Year Funded Increase in School Homestead Exemption (5196.031(3)(d). F.S.) (Type in Zero (0) lot School R.L.E. and Capital Outlay Lewes) $ _66,4ffh,1Z9—�- $ • 11,465,490._.._. $ _16Z,6Q3 - $ .-78 X7.222_.,_ _ _ s_ ..- ... 0--- .. $ J8,117,222_ _ g 2.,806,47� _ (13) Prior Year Effective Taxable Value 01) . (12) $ 73,286.899 . -... g 3.456 per $1,000 (14) Prior Year Operating Millage Levy $ _253,2I9..52.____... (15) Prior Year Ad Valorem Proceeds (13) A (14) 3,3631 (16) Rolled -Back Rate for Current Year (151/(10) por $1,000 do hereby cerlify the values shown herein to be correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Witness my hand and official signature at Tavares Florida this the—lSt.---- r day of._July._. .._ _-_-- , 19.___82__. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE Properly Appraiser Proposed millage for the Current year debt N/A service levy ---- first public budget hearing , (Net of Sales tax relief 2, 7932 for participating authorities) - -- - Day. Time and Place of th%lednesday, September 8, 1982 , 7130 p.m. - City Council Chambers first public budget hearing _......---882--'— Public Safety Building - /DeSoto Street Clermont Florida 1 do hereby certify the millages shown herein to be correct to the best of my knowledge and ballot. Witness my hand l�and �official C (�Ol �>n[1 this the _L L day signature at - • - �"--�--� Of "v. (.�•C�� , 19 Chief Operating Officer Telephone Number IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR COUNTIES AND CITIES PARTICIPATING IN THE HALF•CENT SALES TAX DISTRIBUTION: . PLEASE ATTACH PART II OF THE DR•420 TO PART I WHEN Rl TURNING THIS CERTIFICATION TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISER. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE. ,;, -,/I , f , 1, I 3 el "Uuy" L"—; c" 411ly-C If Ll 1;�f L '7-71 Ile It y (I-Cf 0-4 j N N A r r co r O I JI I O n N N A 0 O A IO r co w 1A r Ln tr A m I I N w N O N O A O, I 1 I 1 W QUI 0 co 00 O m O m W V O UI O N W J O N O m I03 r N r N In W JD m ul A J J J N . A (Ar to I OO 0 W %0 W N O N NO r F. r A W 01 p O A J m W J m m O J ID J ID O 10 O N O N O V r if N r D 0 c O O lnwtKl xw r O r In A r N J r m ut u, m r O w I 1 1 1 1 ' o w w H-Irmff m o e C A N co w �+ ;a O< N :0 m v 0 i ,MW.4W& ,C,ea&ray/ J'_-/o�rr,i�sl,7 �eyia v�0 I�Oaanrrilrry a-AFAWAVAI H rllvm+..•. M..d • S yr. 01AIN • Wi­ dw , k, Fy..rd. 707A4V• r" P*w 1 (70d11( AUGUST,1982 Florida Personal Income According to figures recently released by the U,S, Department of Commerce, total personal income great(Istor Florida increase inefivents nyearscandreasbrougllt Floridian's personal7incomeand 980. This to a totnliefthc more than 88 billion. Total personal income is divided into 3 mein groups: wage and salary - which increased nsrtransfer payment which %0uincome grouped together in the inc7% for the dvidondsintersandh climb The East Central Florida region exhibited healthy gains in total personal income levels with Brovard, Orange, Osceola and Seminole showing gains higher than the state average. COsceola ountiesCfellyled belowthe theregion with state averageeatighest 16,5 andc15.1aat 19 percentF,esla and Lake respectively. Other data released through the U.S. Dept. of Commerce revealed income derived from the services and manufacturing sector has increased statewide between 197E anti 1980 while income earned in the construction sector remained constant for the same period. Earned income derived through governmental services declined statewide 3.5 percent from 75 to 80. The East Central Florida region followed statewide trends showing decreases in government sector earning, while all six counties saw a rise in the manufacturing sector's earnings with Brevard County leading with a 9.5% increase since 1975. U.S. Dept. of Commerce Figures compiled from "Snonoalie Leaf Zeta'' published by Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida. Totf_ FlorlJatandt[ strCentr InFlariJa9Cwnl fe19A 0, Prmportlon of interne [nmed In Sel acted 5ret ors, 19J5 aM 118. Pr...rt3nn of Intone Ea coed Ht V,r it. Seetl BY Plv ce a! XorA (U Total Pe ...l Income Pe went Ihn,ihctu riot e_n+_ct lon love rn,Mt (NII If ua'n,aoit0ol is rs) Chan[e 1979 19A0 Cc(St a[e _ ..ar__Ices Mount of St- Auwt Per C.Pl to 1973 19An 12.5 13.7 17.8 17.8 1980 1979 1980 1']79.1980 (Uvllors) Ptr C.plt. l0nllar.) 20.1 14.6 20.1 1.0. 8,993 100. IO.d 21 12.E I3.] J.e J.P Florlda 76,.S3 8e,693 16.4 8,03, 76, 93. e61 10tl9..1R 333.1 21,1 9.1 9.3 10,] 21191113S33...1 6.6 Br,vvrd 2,�ae9 ],534 93.8 316 25.15. 8.6 .0f 15.7 "1, 163 72.32 ].]0 I91 . 0r 9.0 e7I 18 .5, 16.9 1,6 20.9 to.$ I5.096 Sc1. ainoa 1,173 11E Re.l ],08] 21.9 1.9131 Vvlusla 1,»e 7,100 (DJ O,u mlthhelJ to avv1J dlsclosury mf Inform t J., for Indlrldual cwpante. Svurea: U.S., Dep.nment of Commerce, Su_. of fcanmmit M,ly, llr UnP„GII+heJ U.+t. County Population Projections The latest University of Florida population projections were released in July. These projections are revised annually and the projections for the counties within the cast central Florida region haver once again, been revised upwards. Osceola County has the largest projected population increase followed by Seminole County. Using medium projec- tions the anticipated growth of the region will reach 60 percent. u+lver,lty of Florida Pvpul.tlon PTCJ.etlon by Cvvnty: Neal- and NI{h I'll19es estlute Nldlwl 111[h 0- erev,ra 2e 1,/96 303,Sv0 ,la 1990 Ned lam I11[h 331,100 371,700 - 1995 Ned lv IIl {h ]5,.000 ,17, =00 2000 Nedlw 37I,300 111{h 190,300 Ned lam Ie1�500 +° 111 [h 250,,00 McJlum 200�5 0 3f Or,np O1.7s1 11 6.810]32,9 I ' Zee1IS s23.700 0 ']OL 200 t26.. MQ sJ3,00625,/00600 266300 1, 1, e00 J03500 1]6,s00 ]OS, 200 Sea, 100 1 U.,00 367 000 433.600 e0e7a0 ,,00 ,Ie,300 , ,71, 000 1e7, 200 /69,100. 3,],700 e79,500 ,]/�00 ]10,600 6rY 7 ' I.... Un Svers It f Florlda PrvJ,ctl on emn of ttvnvm/c and euslnes, e.... rch, Y e !{h 2,800 S4, t 8,no 8, 00l 17,100 a3,9oa Uler 7d '7UOU/J0T3 6TZ Xo© '0'd a6pi XaTJ aUowaoT,7 sogaod Q o6aoaq •aW 'crl y1d ,MJsd p1uIM ` , LOE•E'o1J JlwJed 6612E V01801d MJVd U31NIM s7gwd'y �?; OVOU 38OWAM 1101 81Va 111Ht1„; 111003 tumulld RUOIN 1'puolJ 11033 111] J„ Good Newsjor Orantte County r In a,ropport roleased by Florida Federal Savings and Loan comparing building activity in 26 Plorida counties from the final quarter of 1981 to the first quarter of 1982 Orange County'increasos ranked third among the, counties survoyed;it was surpassed only by Palm Beach and Dada Counties'."..The dark horse in the -first quarter df 1982 turned out to be Orange County, which experienced a phenomenal 236.91 increase in mblti-family permits and a 9.94 riso'in-single family ppermits. Total permits rose 78.6%in the quarterly comparison'. In'the annual comparison:Orango County was the only county to show a not gain in'permits,of 1.91, again concentrated in the multi -family sector." in contrast.to'the national housing market, Where total units permitted dropped 1.81 from the,fourth'quarter of 1981 to the first quarter of 1982; Florida's housing market apppewarodlto.be,stabilizing. During the same period the 26 Florida counties surveyed' showod,d'net;gain of S.8 portent.' Prom The Researcher" published by Florida Federal Savings and Loan Florida's Nonpermanent Households In April, 1982 the Census Bureau released their counts of non -permanent residents by state and county. Only nonpermanent residents staying in housing units occupied entirely by persons with a usual home elsewhere are included in this report. Persons staying in motels; hotels or in the home of a permanent resident are not included in this study. Nationwide, there were 547,100 people staying in 300,586 separate households who met the above criteria as nonpermanent residents. 46 percent of these people were counted as nonpermanent residents in Florida. Not only did Florida have'the largest number of nonpermanent residents but also the highest ratio of nonpermanent to permanent residents with 2S.9 such persons for every 1,000 permanent residents. Florida's nonpermanent residents were generally found to be retired people with over 401 of these households composed entirely of persons over the age of 65. New York was indicated as the state of the usual residence by the largest number of nonpermanent residents'. 7.5 percent of the states nonpermanent residents reside in the six county East Central Florida region. Volusia county had the greatest amount of such residents followed by Frevard County, both averaging approximately 2.2%of Florida's nonpermanent households. Seminole County had the smallest amount of nonpermanent residents for the region with only .4t of such households. Region of Usual Residence Nonpermanent North Outside State Not Households Northeast Central South West U.S. Reported' Florida 132,257 49,288 S2,553 14,488 1,152 69 14,707 •Brevard 2,894 1,314 882 559 79 S 60 1S7 Lake 1,079 Orange 1,287 294 366 484 343 139 257 27 3 291 Osceola.: 1,144 Seminole.: S96 456 205 1 S26 1 188 125 159 9 i8 28 26 i Volusia'a 2,966 1,49S 827 531 31 1 81 Rogion ';9,966 4,130 1 '3,250 1 1,770 169 73 643 IC Prom U 5 Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of h;census ip I �71 r.�j� t �: p FF OVrn oMa No, 40,R100/ ;iITL'D fTATE6 DGPARTMhNT OF AGRICUL'. :)6 C N Form Fm1IA 424.7 FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION OMDCM No, (Rev.6-fl-60) a ?._r 0 65 (Final CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER OAT c c--a.....1...—I tnnn STATIC CONTFIAC7 FOR COUNTY Contract No 2 Well and Pump Station Lake OWN Cn City of Clermont, P. 0. Box 211 Clermont, Florida 32711 - Mechanical &Chemical Equipment„Co., ,IU!'.1„•P,,,f)•,,,,. Pox ...7.a9.a....4raOd.(tn.,•.FJ.D.r..i.d..a 33511....... TO ; rC...... ) You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes Irom the contract plans and specificut ions: Description of Chalgcu DECREASE !INCREASE (Supplemental Plans and Spcciilcutlons Attached) in Contract Price in Contract Price Final As -Built Quantities- Original, Contract s s 3,710.00 Final As -Built Quantities- Change Order No. 2 2,420.00 Final As -Built Quantities- Change Order No. 4 1,237.50 Field Changes ordered by Engineer 2,936.00 Correction for Error in Extensions- C.O. No.2 60.00 Credit for sampling done by City 950.00 ............................I.............. .. ....... . TOTALS s.4.a66T,AQ..... ..... ..... ...._..-.6..6.4.6-0.0............ . JUSTIFICATION: - See attached sheets The amount of the Contract will be (ff)M*X)j9A (Increased) By The Sum Of: One thousand nine hundred seventy—eight dollars and 50/100------------------------- Dollar.(s 1,978.50 ), The Contract Total Including this and previous Change Orders Will Be., Three hundred four thousand, six hundred thirty-seven dollars and 50/100---------- =------- Dollars(s 304=637.50 ). The Contract Period Pr6vided for Completion Will Be ) (Unchanged): 0 Days. This document will become a supplement to the contract and all provisions will apply hereto. Requested n.r.i .City of Clermont jOi"^•" r Recommended to.,.1 . ElmerSampson, r te'Engr aeroenarneeri Accepted mechanical & Cemlca Equipment Co.4-tries—) rna.i Approved By FmHA (Name and Title) soar.) Ehl./ormatlOn will M uNd al ncdrd of any Number cople. re0ulr.dl No....... monle. or ot'.r bane,,,, may be plldoutund.rI'lle t0 l'. 011aln.l COAIIrYCIIOn Cdnif.e,• program un,ea. I'la report I{ cn pleted and Illed. reoulred by Tlm. to comDlalal 70 min. .xlalln9 law and re0ul.tlan, Q C.F.R. part 1924). • I'mIiA 424.7 (Rcv, &11 60) yrn+irim, A W N H -Ra -. ro m'O fT v r v 0 O t % s . . d . d n m, i1 ? t P .., N m m K 0 t' �'Oa /d 0 [a 0r � p aw < b m (� N N J w .c+ n ' m tOn a w ,a —3 r r lJ tp tD O A -4 1 Vl O 0 0 0 o\^ 'to O o w 52_Q 9 q CR 3 3 a F N � cN R H �t rWt cp .µh00 'Y 1 � � n I o MEto g O 1+ tD p m µ d o N • y. R n t A W C Q rn rn w