01-28-1975 Supporting DocumentsMINu ms M 1110
REGULAR MEETING
A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Clermont was held in the
Council Chambers on Tuesday, January 2I3, 1975. The meeting was called to order at
7:30 P. M. by Mayor Claude E. Smoak, Jr., with the following members present:
Councilmen Byrd, Schroodel and Oswalt. Other officials present were: City Manager
y
Hopkins, Director of Community Services Smythe, City Attorney Vason, City Controller
Fleming, Chief of Police Tyndal and Deputy Clerk Dollar. Others present were: Mr. and
Mrs. John Aull, and Messrs. Jones, Bailey, Wootson, Hovis, Mecht:old, Corregan and
West. A representative of the Sentinel/Star was also present.
The Invocation was given by Councilman Byrd, followed by repeating of the Pledge of
Allegiance in unison by those present.
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting held on January lh, 1975, were approved as written.
Mayor Smoak announced the first order of business to be the continuation of the request
by Marvin and Thelma Jones for a Variance to Section 26-22 (C) (3) (LOT AREA PER
FAMILY) of the Zoning Ordinance in order to construct a duplex on the East 177.5 feet
of the South 45 feet of Lot 13 in Lettered Block BB. Mr. Nick Jones, representing
Mr. and Mrs. M. Jones, presented information requested at the last council meeting.
He advised that they would as owners be willing to dedicate an easement to the City
of eight feet across the south end of the property; also as owners, they would be
willing to incur the costs for the relocation of the inlet which will be a three-way
catch basin. Mr. R. A. Corregan and Mr. and Mrs. M echtold voiced objections to the
City permitting a duplex, as planned, to be constructed on this property; however,
Mr. Corregan had no objection to an easement. Following Council discussion on other
items such as written proposals from the owner pertaining to the easement, storm drain
and acceptance of the storm drain proposal by the County, motion was ma_d_e� Council-
man Byrd that the Variance be granted. The motion died for a lack of a second. Motion
,, a�ma n�wa r_ cncnn �d by Councilman Schroedel that the hearing on
Mayor Smoak announced that Council would now sit as a Board of Adjustment to consider
a request from John U. Aull for a Variance to Section 26-23 (E) (3) Rear Setback on
property described as Lot One, Block Four, Sunnyside. The Mayor referred to corres-
pondence from the City Manager to Council specifying the reasons for this request,
copy of which is attached to these minutes, and stated the initial request granted
to Mr. Aull on October 9, 1973, did not include a request for another six-inch setback
and it was his opinion that the request should ua granted. There was no one present
who objected to the Variance. Motion was made by Councilman Oswalt, seconded b
Councilman Schroedel and unanimously came tat the ar�ance a grante .
Mayor Smoak announced the Council would continue to sit as a Board of Adjustment to
consider application by T. L. Wootson for a Variance to Section 26-60 of the Zoning
Ordinance (Existing Lots) on property owned by him and described as Lot 10, Pinecrest.
There was no one present who objected to the Variance. Motu w made by Connc_ il.an
City Manager Hopkins reported as follows:
That Mr. Leonard Baird, Jr., chairman of the Charter Revision Committee, has asked
him to report to Council that the Committee has been meeting on a regular basis; that
they have concluded their initial review of the Charter and are now in the process of
developing final wording for consideration by the Committee of the Charter.
That the timer for the dock lighting at the fishing pier has been ordered and will be
installed as soon as the necessary material are available.
MINUTES
City Manager Hopkins reported on a meeting that he, and City Attorney Vason had with
Mr. Maker regarding the irrigation well. He stated they attempted to approach the
subject from two angles: (1) to take a firm position in that the City desired to
terminate the agreement, and (2) on the basis of certain amendments to the agreement.
However, Mr. Baker indicated that he was not in favor of terminating the agreement,
that he would defend the agreement even up to legal action. Mr. Baker, however, was
agreeable to a compromise. Mr. Hopkins continued with considerable background infor-
mation on the events leading up to the existing agreement with Mr. Baker and stated
it is his conlusion that the City should attempt to work out an agreement to continue
on the same basis, with some limitations to protect the City and that he had no
recommendation as to whether the City should terminate the contract or not, but that
fie did feel both parties had entered the agreement in good faith. Council considered
the agreement further. Mayor Smoak maintained the City should terminate the agreement
with Mr. Baker. Others of the Council felt that some compromise with Mr. Baker should
be considered. Motion was made by Mr. Byrd seconded b� Mr�. Schroedel that the City
Mr. Hopkins further reported that the removal of the trees on the Johnson property
had been started.
That the 1974-75 Budget provides for an expenditure of $300.00 to the South Lake
Neighborhood Center and they have requested these funds and have submitted their
1974 Financial Statement in support of their request. Motion was made b Councilman
Rvrd_ cprnndpd by Councilman Schroedel, and unanimously carried that the request of
Mayor Smoa requeste City Manager Hopkins to express to the Lente
ion of the Council for the efforts they are doing in the community.
City Controller Fleming reported that the City still has approximately $5,000.00 in
the general fund and with the anticipation of the water and sanitation monies at the
first of the month, this will carry us to the end of February and hopefully we will
begin to receive tax monies.
City Attorney Vason stated he had no report to make, but that he was still reviewing
the Michael s-Stiggins agreements and would have a report for the next meeting.
Mayor Smoak commented on the reports of the Borrow Pit, and on his on -site observations
and that he was glad to see the Borrow Pit finally functioning properly.
Councilman Oswalt offered and moved, the adoption of AN ORDINANCE UNDER THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING SUB -SECTION (B) (2)
OF SECTION 26-28 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES: ESTABLISHING A RATE SCHEDULE FOR APPLICA-
TIONS FOR CHANGES IN ZONING; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY: PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE: AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION and the
motion was seconded by Councilman Schroedel. The ORDINANCE was read for a second and
final reading, by title only, by City Attorney Vason and upon roll call vote on passage
of the motion, the result was: Ayes: Oswalt, Schroedel, Byrd and Smoak. Total Ayes:
Four. Nayes: None. Absent: Blackburn. So the ORDINANCE was adopted and the Number
128-C assigned to it.
Resolution No. 251 Authorizing the issuance of Not exceeding $323,100 Water and Sewer
Revenue Bonds was discussed by Council and it was the consensus that before a vote
was taken on the Resolution that Council be furnished a clarification of the $323,100
to be borrowed, that the City was not committing themselves to an amount of money that
was not required. Mr. Hopkins advised that he will contact FHA and pose the question,
MINUTES
City Manager Hopkins reported on a wooting that It(,, and City Attorney Vason had with
Mr, Baker regarding I;he irrigation well. Ile stated they attempted to approach the
subJert from two angles: (1) to take a firm position in that the City desired to
terminate the agreement, and (2) on the basis of curtain amendments to the agreement.
However, Mr. Baker indicated that he was not in favor of terminating the agreement,
that he would defend the agreement even up to legal action. Mr. Baker, however, was
agreeable to a compromise. Mr. Hopkins continued with considerable background infor-
mation on the events leading up to the existing agreement with Mr. Baker and stated
It is his corslusion that thr City should attempt to work out an agreement to continue
on the same basis, with some limitations to protect the City and that he had no
recommendation as to whether the City should terminate the contract or not, but that
he did feel both parties had entered the agreement in good faith. Council considered
the agreement further. Mayor Smoak maintained the City should terminate the agreement
with Mr. Baker. Others of the Council felt that some compromise with Mr. Baker should
be considered. Motion was made by Mr. Byrd. seconded by Mr. Schroedel that the City_
Manager and Citv ttornev can•fn'ue their negot at ons_with Mr. (3aker towards a nossf-
Mr. Hopkins further reported that the removal of the trees on the Johnson property
had been started.
That the 1974-75 Budget provides for an expenditure of $300.00 to the South Lake
Neighborhood Center and they have requested these funds and have submitted their
1974 Financial Statement in support of their request. Motion was made_ by Councilman --
Byrd. seconded by Councilman Schroedel. and unanimously came t at t e request of
to them. Mayor Smoak requested City Manager Hopkins to express to the center the
appreciation of the Council for the efforts they are doing in the community.
City Controller Fleming reported that the City still has approximately $5,000.00 in
the general fund and with the anticipation of the water and sanitation monies at the
first of the month, this will carry us to the end of February and hopefully we will
begin to receive tax monies.
City Attorney Vason stated he had no report to make, but that he was still reviewing
the Michael s-Stiggins agreements and would have a report for the next meeting.
Mayor Smoak commented on the reports of the Borrow Pit, and on his on -site observations
and that he was glad to see the Borrow Pit finally functioning properly.
Councilman Oswalt offered and moved, the adoption of AN ORDINANCE UNDER THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING SUB -SECTION (B) (2)
OF SECTION 26-28 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES: ESTABLISHING A RATE SCHEDULE FOR APPLICA-
TIONS FOR CHANGES IN ZONING; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY: PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE: AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION and the
motion was seconded by Councilman Schroedel. The ORDINANCE was read for a second and
final reading, by title only, by City Attorney Vason and upon roll call vote on passage
of the motion, the result was: Ayes: Oswalt, Schroedel, Byrd and Smoak. Total Ayes:
Four. Nayes: None. Absent: Blackburn. So the ORDINANCE was adopted and the Number
128-C assigned to it.
Resolution No. 251 Authorizing the issuance of Not exceeding $323,100 Water and Sewer
Revenue Bonds was discussed by Council and it was the consensus that before a vote
was taken on the Resolution that Council be furnished a clarification of the $323,100
to be borrowed, that the City was not committing themselves to an amount of money that
was not required. Mr. Hopkins advised that he will contact FHA and pose the question,
MINlAIS Ml 1112
should the City not need this amount of money that they will not be ob1lgnted to borrow
it and subsequently pay it back with interest.
Councilman Oswalt introduced AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE UNDER THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE CITY OF CLERMONT TRAFFIC
INFRACTIONS BUREAU, APPOINTING THE MUNICIPAL JUDGE AS THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE AND
JUDICIAL OFFICIAL OF THE TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS BUREAU, DESIGNATING THE CLERK OF THE
COURT AS THE TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS BUREAU OFFICER TO RECEIVE PAYMENT OF CIVIL PENALTIES
PAID UNTO THE TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS BUREAU; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HERE-
WITH; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE and the ORDINANCE was
read for a first time by Mayor Smoak by title only.
Councilman Oswalt offered and moved the adoption of THE EMERGENCY ORDINANCE as intro-
duced and descr9bedmme ate y above, and the motion was seconded by Councilman Schroedel.
THE EMERGENCY ORDINANCE was read for a second and final reading by Mayor Smoak by title
only, and upon roll call vote on passage of the motion, the result was: Ayes: Oswalt,
Schroedel, Byrd and Smoak. Total Ayes: Four. Nayes: None. Absent: Blackburn. So
the EMERGENCY ordinance was adopted and the Number 71-M assigned to it.
Councilman Oswalt introduced AN ORDINANCE UNDER THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY
F CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE CITY OF CLERMONT TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS
BUREAU, APPOINTING THE MUNICIPAL JUDGE AS THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL OFFICIAL
OF THE TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS BUREAU, DESIGNATING THE CLERK OF THE COURT AS THE TRAFFIC
INFRACTIONS BUREAU OFFICER TO RECEIVE PAYMENT OF CIVIL PENALTIES PAID UNTO THE TRAFFIC
INFRACTIONS BUREAU; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR SEVERA-
BILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION and the ORDINANCE
was read for a first reading by Mayor Smoak, by title only.
Mayor Smoak stated that Council had failed to elect a Mayor Pro Tom at the organizational
meeting. It was placed on the agenda for action and the election was made as follows:
Mayor Pro Tem
Carlisle A. Byrd, Jr.
Mntinn was made by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Councilman Oswalt and unanimously
City Manager Hopkins submitted a proposal (copy of which is attached to these minutes)
to Council to make cremorials available at Oak Hill Cemetery, as at the present time the
only space to bury cremation remains at the cemetery is in the standard (5' x 10') burial
space. He recommended that the City make cremorials available to the public at a cost of
$125.00 each advising this will provide greater net revenue to the City, provide a savings
to the consumer and provide for better utilization of the land at the cemetery. Motion was
made bV Councilman Schroedel, seconded by Councilman Byrd, and unanimously carries tT �a_
wou
ngency.
The meeting was adjourned by Mayor Smoak at 9:30 P. M.
Claude E. Smoak, Jr., Mayor
M. Dollar, Deputy Clerk
'UNITED FTATEs DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
' rAnMERa HOMC ADMINIGTRATION
Public Body
Tot City of Clermont Date() a ,,.c.tc 't. �.
4C 77,
Clermont, Florida 32'f1l — tT
Prom: County Supervisor, MIA
Orlando, Florida
This letter establishos conditions which must be understood and agreed to by
you before further consideration may be given to the application.
This letter is not to be considered as loan approval or as a representation as
to the availability of
funds, The docket may be completed on the basis of a
loan not to exceed $ 168
,100 If FIIA makes the loan, the
interest rate will be that charged by FIIA at the time of loan approval.
Please complete and return the attached Form FHA 442-46, if you desire that
further consideration be given your application.
If the conditions set forth in this letter are not met within 365 days from
the date hereof, FHA reserves the right to discontinue the processing of the
application,
flepavment Schedule:
The loan will be repayable over a period not exceeding 40 years from the
date of loan closing, The first and second payments) will be due Scp`. 1, "
following loan closing and will consist of interest only. The third
payment and all succeeding installments except the last installment will be due
on Sept, li and will consist of bond maturities plus accrued interest.
*This date includes initial loan.
Number of Users and Verification Required:
Prior to beginning construction, if interim financing is used or otherwise prior
to closing of the FHA loan, the Association will furnish evidence that !'7t18
water users and 1625 sewer users have agreed to pay monthly charges for
services to be received from the facility being financed,
All -new -water -users-in- the- service-are-a-inuSt execut�a Usmtrotgreeiserct�ropared
in-aeeordanee-with-the-etteehed--fo=at. All potential sewer users, who reside
outside the corporate limits, must also execute a Users Agreement. A member of
the State Director's staff will audit and authenticate the number of users
obtained and check evidence of required cash contributions, if a cash contri-
bution is required.
Farmers Home Administration is an Equal Opportunity I.eruler.
Complaints of racial or etJmie discrirnirwtion should be rent to:
Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. 20250
,.,7i
011ttucionn
finch usor shall contribute $ 0 cnsh toward the development of the
project when the Usor Agreement la executed. This coati contribution shall be
used no follows:
a, establish an initial operating and mnintonanco fund.
b. $ establish an initial reserve.
C. deposit in a supervised bank account with loan funds
at loan closing for development.
M Interim Finnncina:
The Association will attempt to borrow funds from commercial sources in the
amount of the FHA loan for the construction period only. If credit from com-
mercial sources cannot be obtained, letters from these sources are to be
obtained stating that credit is not available and submitted to the County
Supervisor.
Attached are copies of F1lA Guido 1, Guide Letter for use in Informing Private
Lender of FHA's Commitment, and Florida Guide 11, Memorandum of Understanding,
which will be provided by FHA upon request.
Provided interim financing is used, construction will not begin until construc-
tion and bond bids are obtained and the necessary processing and legal work has
been completed to the point to where the FRA loan could be closed. The County
Supervisor will approve Form FHA 424-1g, "Partial Pay Estimate," to insure that --
funds are used for authorized purposes during the constrution period.
if interim financing is used, although a binding commitment has been made by the
Government, only those funds advanced to pay for construction and other authorized
and legally eligible expenses incurred by the Association will be deemed by the
Government to be interim commercial indebtedness and retired by FHA with per-
manent instruments. The F1IA must be sure that the construction loan is properly
administered and that when the FHA loan is closed there is no doubt that the
FHA is fully secured. The FHA must insist on the following at loan closing: .
a. An affidavit by the general contractor that he has been paid in full, in
accordance with the terms of the contract, and that he has paid all sub -contractors,
materialmen and laborers with respect to the construction of the project. (It
may be that he will have to get his final payment at the bond closing, from
bond proceeds, and perhaps make some disbursements at that time to subcontractors
and suppliers.)
b. A certificate by the consulting engineer that the system has been constructed
in accordance with applicable law and according to the plans and specifications
approved by the Government.
c. A statement from the attorney that he has been paid to date in accordance
with his agreement.
'Interim financing will be secured from the State Department of Pollution Control.
An unqualified opinion from bond counnal will be required, It will be the
responsibility of the Association and its coimnorcial lender to be certain that
bond consel d will
ssue an
will beurequired ltoafurnish ievidence that unqualified theinterim financing has been
counsel
been
paid in full.
Wboinancing
ds
ve been
andnpermanent interim £instrwrientanwill aexpanded,
be issued to evidence he F1iA indebtedness.
Sacurtty Rr,auirementn
security will consist of revenue bonds secured by a pledge of revenue from the
facility being financed plus any other revenue required to support the loan
including: .Junior lien on revenuer from water and newer facilities; junior lien
on oxcice taxes and front 1'001 auaaacmont on approximately 10,357 of benefited properties for tan yonru 0 614 interest. The auoesnment• will be $4.0Q per root,
,f�tle to property:
The Association will provide evidence of title satisfactory to the FHA for
all assets which will constitute security for the loan.
• Qrcnnlzation•
The loan docket will include evidence that the Association is legally organized
under state statutes such as a copy of the Charter or other acts of enabling
legislation. The attorney is to provide an opinion that the applicant has
authority to carry out the planned method of construction, operation and main-
tenance and repayment in connection with the planned facility.
Business 9ne99tiena:
The bond ordinance will require that the Association establish as soon as the
system becomes revenue producing a depositary in the State of Florida which is
a member of the FDIC and which is eligible under the laws of Florida to receive
municipal funds and maintain for the term of the loan a special fund known d.
u City of Clermont water and newer system revenue fund.
These funds are to be kept separate from all other funds of the Association and
will be expended and used only as stipulated in a bond ordinance approved by
theFarmers
f Administration. A
reserve account
will accumulated
at e
ratoonetehofthe annual paymentuntilthisaccountreachtheamount
of one annual payment.
in accordance
ploridaoInstructionl442 1A outliningnoperation procedureahforithegfacility.
The Ansociation will furninh an outline of the management procedures for the
facility to include the name of the pernon(n) who will oporata the facility
along with a brief ngroement between the person(a) and the Aunoeiotion showing
aervices to be performed and wagua to be paid.
Insurance and p2 din1L
Property insurance, fire and extended coverage will be required on all above-
ground structures including equipment and machinery in an amount equal to the
replacement value an recommended by the project ongincer and approved by the
FHA. No insurance will be required on water reservoirs, otandpipos and elevated
tanks.
Requirements an outlined in "Appendix B" of FRA Instruction 442.1 end Item 21
of "Contract Documents for Federally Assisted Water and Sewer Projects" will
be followed by the Association's engineer or architect for all construction.
Aorkmen'a compensation will be maintained no required by State law.
Public liability and property damage insurance will be maintained as recommended
by the applicant's attorney and approved by the FHA. If the Association will
own trucks, tractors, or other vehicles that frequently will be driven over
public highways, public liability and property damage insurance will be required.
Fidelity bond ' 150,000 on the position of the treasurer and/or others
*who handle collections in an amount at least equal to the total amount of funds
that will be on hand at any one time exclusive of loan funds is required. This
bond will be obtained prior to loan closing. Form F11A 440-24, "Position Fidelity
Bond," will be used and copies are attached.
Construction Contrnct Documents and Biddinp:
Appendix B of MIA Instruction 442.1 and "Contract Documents for Construction of
Federally assisted Water and Sewer Projects" will be followed by the Association
and engineer or architect for all construction. Two copies each of these'docu-
ments are attached and one copy is to be delivered to your engineer or architect
and attorney.
A pie -construction conference will be held after bid opening at a convenient
time to be scheduled by FHA. In attendance will be the designated representa-
tives of the Association, the consulting engineer, contractors' representatives
and FHA personnel.
ccounts Records and Audit Reports Required:
The Association will be required to keep accounts and records on the operation
of the facility separate and apart from other records in accordance with the
bond ordinance. We suggest that the Association's auditing firm develop a set
of records for this particular purpose unless adequate records are already in
use. The person responsible for maintaining such records of accounts will be
selected prior to loan closing.
7
i
It Is im:,orntiva that the Association eatablinh and maintain adequate buaineas
management practices through it system of recordn, reporLa and audits which will
assist the governing body in making effective docinionn and thus hall) to insura
a successful operation.
FHA will be furnished management reports an outlined in Paragraph 1823.14 (a) -
(g) of Appendix A of FILA Instruction 442.1. A copy of this appendix is attached
along with copies of our forms to be used for periodic and annual reports.
Prior to loan closing the Association will enter into n contract with n qualified
auditor to conduct the annual audit. Requirements pertaining to audit reports
tiro contained in a booklet, 111711A Instructions to Independent Certified riblic
Accountants and Licensed Public Accountants," Two copies of Chia booklet are
attached. Please refer to page 10 of the booklet for an example of an auditor -
borrower written agreement.
All forms nodded for required FIN reports will be furnished by this office.
The Association's attorney will obtain the assistance of recognized bond counsel. :
All documents necessary to close the interim financing loan and the FHA loan
must be prepared by bond counsel. Appendix C of FHA Instruction 442.1 will be
followed by the Association's attorney and bond counsel.
Closinp Instructions:
jThe loan will not be closed until the Regional Attorney ties been furnished all
j the.documents required and has issued closing instructions. The Association's...._..._...
attorney will carry out the Regional Attorney's closing instructions and will
certify that the loan closed in accordance with the Regional Attorney's closing
instructions.
Other Requirements which Must be Net and Forms to be Completed:
A rate schedule will be adopted by the Association providing for the following
residential user rates:
Water Rate
First , 3,000 gallons $ .4.00 per month - minimum
Next 7,000 gallons $ .50 per 1,000 gallons
Next gallons $ per 1,000 gallons
Next Gallons $ per 1,000 gallons
All over 10,000 gallons $��� per 1,000 gallons -
Commercial rates will be established as follows: Same as residential.
Outside City limits 125% of above rates with 0.00 mini.mwn.
Water Rate
First
t•allons
$ per
month
- minimum
Next
gallons
$ per
1,000
gallons
Next
gallons
$ per
1,000
gallons
All over
gallons
$ger
1,000
gallons
Sevier - Residential
and conuuercial - See
ACta.ciunent A.
r
All residents located in the service nrnn regardlean of rnco, color,
creed or level of income must be afforded an opportunity to become users
of the facility.
The Association must agree to comply with the requirements of'rorm MIA 1100-1,
"Equal Opportunity Agreement," and roan VILA 400-4, "Nondiscrimination Agreement,"
Those agreements must be approved by the governing body and executed before loan
approval,'
The Association must provide for review and approval by the MIA, before con-
struction begins, o positive program to encourage connections by all users
as soon as the service is available. This program shall include;
a. An aggressive information program to be carried out during the construc-
tion period.
b. Positive steps 6 aesuro that commercial installation services will be
available to users.
c. Aggressive action to ace that all signed users can finance their connec-
tions.
Water and sewer rates as outlined on page five must be in effect before
construction begins.
Properties -with Front foot assessments must be assessed and placed on
tax rolls as soon as legally possible.
The City agrees to provide any funds needed for contingencies for this
project,.
If the Association decides to accept PHA services under the above conditions,
we will proceed to take the necessgry steps to process the loan.
County Supervisor -�
Enclosures
ATTACHMENT A"
SEWER RATE SCHEDULES
EXISTING
ROPO D
Residential:
Single Family
Multiple Family For first family
4.00
4.00
5.2
for each additional living unit
2.00
2. 0
Commercial:
"
Food establishments, seating 20 or less
7.50
0.25
75
35
Extra for each person over 20
Theaters, including Drive-ins
for each toilet or urinal over four
7.50
0.25
75
35,
Laundry and Dry cleaning
7.50
7.50
5
5
Laundrettes, 4 machines n less
Extra for each machine over four
1.50
2•
General business requiring public restrooms
7.50
5.00
9•
6.5
Barber and beauty shops, one operator
1.50
2.00
For each additional operator
{ Drugstores, grocery stores, department stores
5.00
6:50
General not requirinrestrooms 5. no
day nurseries, per pupil 0.10
6.50
0.10
Schools,Business kindergartens,
less
40.00
52.00
Rest homes, 10 rooms or
1.00
1.30
Each room over 10
Hospitals, 10 rooms or less
: 40.00
52.00
1.30
Each room over 10 1.00
7.50
9.75
U. S. PostOffice •
Terminals, bus and railroad
7.50
.7 9 5
9.75
Other public buildings 7.50
7.50
9.75
Hotels, motels, 10 rooms or less
2.00
2.60
Each room over 10
- 5CO
6.50
Churches
i Clinics, office, clubs, lodges
:
500
0.75
6.50
1.00
Each urinal over 4
Industrial; Rates for industrial users will be
established.upon
receipt
Of application.
•
5 -13
i
r 7
(I III 72j0 i PAYMENT AILIT110RIZATION
APPLICANT City of Clermont
AI'IIAL)PRIATION
It cc (lif calf( Code)
Cheek Ole
R' r-11 N ❑2 O 170
A] ❑4 S ❑5
CASH NUMISEII
09-35-
TYPE OF SUHMISSIUN
[DI-INITIAI, [)q2-SUBSEQUENT
NU. OF INSTALLMI:N'f5
41
FIIlS'I' INS'I', DUI:
I-i-76
INTEIIEST HATE
5%
TYPE Uh ASSISTANCE
ASSN.
RIA-MENTS
WITHIN 15 DAYS PRIUIt 'I'U
TRis LUAN
STATE & Co. MAIL CUIX
09-48
I(ECEIPT NU,
DATE
AMOUNT
VETERAN:
]-YES D 2-NO
CHECK DATE AND
SCHEDULE NO.
AMOUNTOFt
$168,100.00
TIi1S SPACE FOII FINANCE
OPPICE USE ONLY EM Loans
IN
I SF
I PY
NO, ADV,
I OL INDEBT.
I SUIL
1 HEREBY CERTIFY that I am unable to obtain sufficient credit elsewhere -to finance my actual needs at reasonable rate. and term.,
taking Into-malderation prevalling private and cooperative tales and terms In or near my community for loans for similar purposes and
period& of time. I agree to use, subject to and In accordance with regulat Ions applicable to the type of assistance Indicated above, and
cen
request payment of the sum specified herein. 1 ify Ih.T a part of said sum has been received. - - — -----
Robert M. Hopkins, City Manager Claude E. Smoak,Jr. (stgn.t-, ol:ivptoanr) ayor
City of Clermont, Florida City of Clermont, Florida
I HEREBY CERTIFY that all of The cammtuee and administrative detetminations and certificetlons requved by I.. or regulation.
......ulnle to providing oral stance of The lip, indicated •bnve have been node and IheI evlJence thereof is in the docket, and that all
requirements of pertinent renulations and laws have been complied with. 1 hereby approve the above -described as .1l.rice in the amount
set faith above, and by Zhu documetn, sub)en In the availability of fund., the Government agrees to advance such amount to the applicant
far the purposes of and subject to the cundibons prescribed by the laws and regulations applicable In this type of assistance.
Complete for petal )O9 a mFis icy Loans Only 11Y AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE
The County Committee certification Tar the
crop year ending ..........
covers this loan, i l l am As E ldri dge'SI..V-1-E -I .I pprn, rag official)
Bate Title Cotfmuni ty Pro ram., Specialist
TO 7}IE ABOVE•' NAMFD APPI rCANT' Tide Is nod- tho your application for the above financial assistance from the Farmrs Home
Adnardstrution has hern upprnvrl, on indicated above, subject to availability of funds and other Conditions required by the Fumlre
Home Adminisltution. If you have any questions contact the County Supervisor,
Amount slated above I.% verified as correct and funds are obligated for payment,
Bate
(.St,gnoture of Authorized F'innnce offlee officfoj)
e U.5. GOv[aNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, 1914-761-156/167 ae9lan e
f �
PHA 440-1 (Rev, 7.19.72)
Position 2
LEGAL, NUNCE
iJoLlec: i.n har.cby yivcn to 41.1. concor.nad
that: the City Council of the: Ci.Ly of
Clermont, Pl.orida nha.l.l, hold a PUbl.ic
Hearing .i.n the Council Chambarn locntad
on the corner of Went• Avenue roil DUSOLO
Streets on Tuonclay, January 20, 1.975 at
7:30 P.M. for the f.oi..lowi.ng purpose:
910 conn:i.der. Var..i.ancc to Section 20-23
(L)(1.), front• Setback, and Section 20-23
(E)(3) Roar Setback on proper.L-y described
"IS
Lots .1., Block 4
Sunnys.ide Unit
All interested parties will be given an
opportunity to express their views on the
above mentioned matter.
R.M. lopl ns, City Manager
January 23, 1975 City of Clermont, Florida
LEGAL NQTTCR
Notice is heroby given to all noncornod
that the City Council of the City of
Clermont, Florida nhall hold a Public
Roaring in the Council Chambors located
on the corner of Wont AVenuu and Desoto
Streets on Tuesday, January 28, 1975 at:
7:30 P.M. for the following purponu:
To consider Varia t
nee .o bection 26-23
Front Setback, and section 26-23
(F)(3) Rear Setback on property dencr.ibed
as
Lots 1, Block 4
Sunnyside Unit
All interested parties will be given an
opportunity to express their views on the
above mentioned matter,
?Vh. ns, City Manager .
January 23, 1975 City of Clermont-, Florida
j
'i'u; I+oard Of.' Arijunt:nuant:
Prom: Ci ty Min naqur.
Sul,'j t .John Au'I..l
l.ot: 1, 131ock 4, Sunnysido till d.l:
14UO Bowman Str.unt
Date: Jann.ary 16, 1975
On October 9, 1973 the Hoard of Adjustment connidorc'd a varianuu
ret-iucnt of Mr. John Aul.l. regarding Lot❑ .l,?.,'i,4,(i and 7 in Bloc::
4, Sunnyud.do Unit.
As the Board will recall, Mr. Aull. dus.ired a redi.vision of the
lota to allow for the construction of a single family dwelling
and two duplex rlwell.ings.
The variance as advertised, which was granted, was to Section
26-23(C)(3) of the Zoning Ordinance (Lot Area per Family). 'Phis,
in effect, was to allow Mr. Aull to "borrow" lot area from two
existing duplex dwelling sites and create two new, standard size
dublex dwelling sites.
Included in his master plan was, in addition to the two duplex
dwelling sites, a single family dwelling site. The site was to be
6103 square feet which meets the lot size requirements of the or-
dinance.
i
While Mr. Aull's letter of request (copy attached) did not mention
any variance needs regarding the single family dwelling, a note on
his drawing supporting his variance request did state that the
"average setback for 3(existing) buildings shown facing Sunnyside
Drive is approximately 1016". For use in determining setbacks
for proposed Lot k1." Lot 1 is the single Eamil.y dwelling lot.
In order to allow for reduced setbacks when the zoning ordinance
requires 25' (the lot is triangular with two sides facing a street),
a setback variance would be necessary. However., this consideration
was not made during the October 9, 1973 hearing.
on July 19, 1974 the building permit was issued to construct the
single family dwelling unit on Lot 1, Block 4. The plans reflected
19' setbacks and not the required 251. As a result, the single
family dwelling being constructed is not in conformance with the
zoning ordinance with respect to the setbacks.
When this matter came to my attention in mid November, 1974, I
met with Mr.. Aull, along with his architect and the city staff.
Due to what I considered extenuating circumstances, construction
was not stopped.
Thn sequence of events and circumstances are os follows:
1. When Mr. Aull decided to pursue this project, lie and his architect
came to my office to discuss the plan. At that time, it was pointed
out that a variance request would be necessary because there were
deviations from the zoning ordinance planned. In response to the
question about the setbacks, I advised Mr. Aull to be sure and note
this item on the drawings to support the variance request.
pra No
2. When Mr. Ault. wan ready Co prorxuld wi.t:h Iho varLunco ruquenl:,
lio submitted bin IOI:L.cr of r.e11100t and Lho niipportinq docum,!nLt;.
Tho ieLLor oxida.hling Lho naL•uro of Lhu- rugcn•nl: did not nlenl.iou
the noi-backs. Whon I:hu clLy clerk prepar.od the logal. advurt:iaomcr;l:, Lhc
1,ctbock Information wia; not; Lnaluclod an IL Will not included in Lho
IutLur.
3. The var.ianco public hearing wan hold on October 9, 1973. Pherq'
was no mention by anyone present rogard.ing the sol:backs forth'--
:;incil.e family dwelling, A copy of: Ole mooting transcript is ,Ittac:led
for roferonco.
•1- Thu building pormlt wan issued on .luly 19, 1974 even though
the setback didn't conform to Lho ordinance. Tho permit: was ist;ucd
without- i.ldequatn compar.innn of the hulldlnc•I plane dnd 1.11 varianc.
—Ildltions. Thu problem should have been deLuCLed aL- h.hal: Limu,
but wan not:.
5. When the setback problem came Lo my attant.i.on, the construction
of the dwelling was alrcody underway. A meeting was held with the
owner and his architect. Since it was my feeling that Mr. Aul.l had
acted in good faiL•h, construction was not halLod.
Conclusion and Recommendation
In view of the action by the Board on OcL_ober 9, 1973 in approving
Mr. Aull's plan as well as an apparent hardship, it .is recommended
that a variance be granted to allow for the 19' setbacks,a variance
of a'. The variance will be Lo Section 26-23(E)(1), Pront Setback,
and 2G-23(L•')(3), Rear Setback.
There is an apparent hardship. The lot is unique in that it is tri-
angular facing streets on two sides. To require 25' setback on the two
sides would make utilization of the property .in a reasonable manner
difficult-.
In addition, this variance would not create a situation contrary to
the public health and safety and would be comparable to the other
structures in the block.
It appears that a number of errors were committed in this matter.
The owner failed to mention the setbacks in the letter of request or
in the public hearing. The City failed to include the request in the
public hearing advertisement, did not mention the subject in the public
hearing and dial not detect the problem at the time of building permit
issuance. A definite breakdown in communications occurred. Steps
have been taken to alleviate this type of problem in the future.
It is my feeling that the recommended course of action is the most
reasonable and appropriate at this time.
A public hearing will. be held during the Council Meeting on January 28,
1975 to consider this matter.
."�`• ohc 1 I. M. II . .ins
R1,1II/ kd
CC. Building Department
All 14113 Ail, ,1.,61 dhdl!
1'.4, jinx 733
Notico of potitton for o vnrinnco on property Sr, no,:% 4,
Ounnyn.ldo Unit, Clermont; Iln.l.ihtn, Clty of Clommnt.
A plot plan Is enclorod :.howi.np; propaond nitcrntlono of
lot l.inon and prnponod nqunro fnoCng0 of now 1.0ta. Alen ai:own
tire the prop000d ni.fo and lowitlon of two duplexe:j.
Thoro nro no proposed oddll,lonn or or,tnnu9.+.nc for ti;i;.
property.
Lot+; No. 1, 2, i, 4, 6, and 7 of Block 4, are proposed
for n rc-di.v,ision of Iota. ExintinR lots dO and 7 me r:roj:ered
to be i.ncreancd to the standard riao required for duple%cs.
Portions of lots W 1, 2, 3, and 4 are to be combined and divided
into two now lots for the two exioting duplexes. Note that
these two new lots will be oub-it.ndard in size dun to the-------'----
inaccesnability to the rear portions of the lots. The inacce:s-
❑bility io due to the presence o1' a sis: foot hir;h retaining;
wall that extends behind the ex :tin,, r.uplexes. Lot ;'Il is
proposed to be reduced in size to the standard si-e required
for a ning-lo fo;Aly runidrnen. The re,.u:t`,r. i:: -ine )f Lot
,il is for the purpose of providi.nr7 acditionul snuare footage
to the existing; 1 o t adjacent to ],at rl in order to rrovide
it with as large a lot as possible for the existing duplex.
1:r1,I'. of t'II: pnr'I:inn r.f '.b„ alinli•r:s of L'I I .-III I •i1
�! li:l,bor 'I. . eI('ri'Ilhi I CI'e
"or Pro 7,11,I
hu'1•i colitinur with r. Pohl 1, .,uirut to
r;,�luast Ly PIr. Oohn ;'•�i'I I. lr,pOns, WoOk; yt,u
rase for 119.
;r. Henvils: Thin; is o parcel of proper .; t:h;,f, i lin,,rn i,y L;,Ir l n+,t„
u,uiYsidr Uvivo and Bowaan Sl:rrr ( own,:r1 is iI.% -Intirr! '•
N,r. 1u11, I.xIsting on the ;ruhor•:.y AI. Hv: menioot is Af., �,vit'.,
sIngie- family residence p i u ; I WL ontaI drolezu:.. It
that wool, Llm two rental rhulexos Viol- lh:, .... .:I(II
miI I Vile; constructed r;o Oro roar i l I.he proialv':,; slit ri in !„ t
physically separates t.11r.• Iront f'+la• .Ilirrls of the
the rear two-thirds of the propc.r!.v, 11r. ,'.ull desir•a:
construct two additional dllple�e.,, ou the ra,nainilo- n
order i.a have sufficI !fit land. squ.:re••fooiar,v wis,. '
requirements of the ordinar!cc to fhl: zone in
llo deems it necessary to borrow property from rile ir,t: :f t"..1:
existin, duplexes. His ;justification Is that: tite r:• .rinirri wall
physIcdIIy separates, as I Bald, the front: two-thirds t r'Ir,
i,resently developed prop rty from tho rear tr:n tl'itdi and ::I:e
newly constructed duplexes ,zooid he a sufficient dlzLana: �rrnn
the oxist.inq duplexes as to not t,. rreato i detrimerr,ri t-.;c,u;t.inn:
Thore is onn existing parcel of (;,',I D and some -odd
lot which would later be suns to he developed into ,Jlvjl,-family
residential parcel and Of: requirements of t.ha o!ciinance o"cr
6,000 square feet for Lhat aid would be enum;r, bhsn •. cl'hs. hull
are here ds well as their architect. It ,.osaibte !Jry tioulJ
want to cumment further.
"'. Brals:
',Ir. Aull, would you like to ,ay anything in addition"'
;,ull
Only that; 1 don't know of any way to select my neirih:,ors only
to own the property arnund r;e to huiid and rent. it. '.ve do, 't.
sell Property. L"verythiny wa h;;ve i, rental, and rr- J. rofc5o
some nice structures on thai: which we thin.: tall 1,(,. c c•edir
and an asset to the area a•; well a creriit to ,;hat we already
have there. Build it :p a littie bit--th;�t is our ir.'e.ntign and
wo hdve--we figure --inquiries Lh,,t. c-in r.nri will i!�nt, the t,,io
Ihat we ril;ond to bui Ill AIM I.hAt i., chr'oc, 'Iarlrooni c'u; l r:m,• -
two of diem, plus the :ie'lle `tr. huu':ins nu:ntioned on the- corner.
We are really to proceed ivit.h it. ;is long +ts 1 can r._;l 10
banker fooled, i've got tho money.
'4r. Br-als:
All right, sir. Mr. Pay, do you have any :omirot?
"r. Day:
All I can say 1s that -1r. AulI an,: i have peen worki:;n to us.e
the land to the best advantage arui to try :r ;leer. with a'7 :ne
requirements of the existing rec;uirc. anC^ uow i'or land ise ina
lot size. We've had to work r;ut'.lac prope ty in order t , in
essence, reduce the norther of loi:s i-i order to create On _;1z9
ir•t,; required for the ,I.ructln•es o; zhaso. that: wn- want: ., pu;: up.
"I" Aull:
thank you,
its. Bawls:
Would anyone else lil:r. I;o spr.ak in favor cif tho u•:ri,�nr_o?
Mr, Schroedal;
I went e111; and looked this all over and to lrQ, i"'S
lie's going to change a briar patch up thrro into sa1a
will bo a thing of beauty. I'm foi- it..
'ir. Beals:
Is there anyone in the audi(nco to spnal. again-, i. .. grar°imi
the Var•ianrr.? Are there i:np cunraonts f rcal the Coiti v_, l'
1r. Sn;aal::
I agree with fir. Schroedel. In effect, what Mr. P,uil is
here is lots that were platter! before prc ent runinu ,:)On,� :
took effect, lip. said that i;e is ,:rnatini lcts that mcr•t. ;,ual•:-
footage specifications to Inrild the cwo new dup1ax=r;. Pu;,.,;r
me if I'nl wrong, Mr. Aull.
tlr. Aull:
Yes, sir.
I•ir. Smoak:
Lots 6 and 1 would meet the requirements of the exi;ting zoning
but at the same time, ,you're reducing the lot size of Lats 2, 3
and 4 to accomplish this. But in the topography of the lanr,
that is in question, bocause of fhe grade on Sunnyside Drive
down to Bowman Street, there effectively is a retainer lmll on
the south side of the existing buildings that I would sa;;, 'in
effect, the property line ceases there today. Basically, the
experience that Mr. Aull has exhibited in everything he has -
built here in this town, I certainly would be in favor aP urantinq
the Variance.
fir. Beals:
What is the pleasure of the Council?
Mr. Schroedel:
Mr. Mayor, I make the motion that the Variance he allowed.
Mr. Smoak:
Second
Mr. Beals:
It has been moved and seconded that the. Variance be granted.
Any further rliscussior,? If not, Lhose in favor signify by
saying Aye.
Aye - Schroedel
Aye - Smoak
Aye - Byrd
Mr. Beals:
Those opposed, same siqn. The Chair votes Aye. The motion
is carried. The Variance is nranted. Thank you, 'dr. A0 1.
Mr. Au11:
Thank you very much
h'r. Beals:
That concludes the public hearing.
CrL'I'LFiC.I r
^'t=
/
/TE
L...L.Lt1. 1 �
1 5' r .'., : /1 ! r• _ , "�;;� t'+L� �.;1.r5-;..
r:.p�%• t4,avtt?t�'k::" _:.�/rw�;./ /
t�A'PPK�
.--_..+.,•ta�rE' cacfir
/ik'e!'• �'�'=�f/. f%iri_?i�(J;^�E:4
Cr.�riv/
� Gxis
nt�a,
BETA t n//n/lo
yVALL.�
xk
i
t
4 t' i}t•
,., Y
tel
i.
�.i!r'YZr•YlTt3`�rC ..i�p
, � t �',R+ . i �'i;
M x '
4=7 .4
Fi'U•N/G % ,t?E � tom£/JGE i ..
Lo7-�!0 - p,.�ovos� A6 5T/lH��� 5/�.F •- _.`
fJr2> jge'Ar 7-p ,�JY3- STA�b•grZGy. ""�.
Tc teiz','-'UtX.�D.
�ixC.G dJ-. d2 tXv-47,l/G bvP4.eX Dvtj To /NAGG�S �n�iuTY Tp
jtFAY Nc'W < oT�v 0t Z a 4RE GM%'O�EIJ
LoT�4 - 3/lhfE 95 rcae 1 or�2 North ;�¢o H Et 3nN'� G c1 3 r 2, 3),4 A /D ii Y%Cnol
iCA
MAD
12,
AVE3CA69
�oQ Ly"� �N l7¢7EK�voa
•
�Atx� FO1Z �.Z
To s City Council
From s City Manager
Subjs �ComeLnry-Crornori.r.11,n
Bates January .15, 1.975
Per some time we have hnO-roquont-n to make cramortals
available at Oak ilill(Cemotary. iTo date the only place
to bury cremation remains at the eematary in in the c.on-
vantiona.l (5' x .101) burial. apace.
Tn response to these requonta, we have dnvral.oped the fe]-
low.ing proposal for your. considorntion.
Available Cremorial Units
_ I
Cremorial Niche Banks arc available from our memorial
supplier, Jas. 11. Matthews & Company.
The basic design of the niche banks consist of twelve
modules, six on each side. Attachments 1 and 2 show the
design of the units and one layout arrangement.
A cost breakdown for installation of a 12 module bank is
as follows:
12 unit bank $ 660.00
"L" bar border 41.00
24 Scrolls w/inscriptions 240.00
24 Canisters 120.00
Concrete base & Labor 100.00 i
$ 1161.00
$1161.00 divided by 1.2 modules = $97/buria.l module
Site Utilization !
Two Conventional lots (10' x 20'ea)=20' x 20' Ij
Lots 14 and 15, Oak Hill. Cemetar.y j
Present II
Two Lots=Four burial spaces I;
Four spaces at $150.00ea or $600.00 `
(Individual also has memorial costs)
Proposed
Two Lots=Four burial spaces
This 20' x 20' area will accomodate 15 of the 12 module banks
15 banks x 12 modules ea=180 modules
The 180 modules will accomodate one or two (individual
or companion)burials. See attachment 3.
I
Summary f
,
The present utilization provides for 4 burials @ $150.00ea
Pago 2
or $600.00. There Is only mi.n.ima 1. expmino t:o the Ci Ly,
The proposed utiliznL•ion provlden for 100 modulr.ri.
1.2 module bank insL•al.laLion $ 11.61.00
201 x 201 area - 15 of Lhc module
banks, $1161.00/bank x .15 banks 1743.5.00
A module would be Hotel for. $1'5.00, Tho modulo would
accomodate the remai.na of one or two poople.
Revenue-1.80 modules x $.1.25.00 $ 22500
Installation costs 17419,
D.ifferencu to CemcL•ary rund $
Cost to consumor
Present Propo:.ted
1 Burial $150 plus Memorial. Costs - $ 125
2 Burials 300 plus Memorial Costs 125
It is recommended that the City make cremorials available to
the public at a cost of $125.00 each.
This will provide greater net revenue to the City, provide
a savings to the consumer and provide for a better utilization
of the land at the cemetary.
itiobert P4 116pkins
RMFI/kd
Attachment
U
1
SOUTH LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER
Financial Statement
1974
Available Funds
an of January 1, 1974
t 377.24
Month
Receipts
Expenditures
B ance forward
t
January
68.36
February
171.45
1.67
March
51.00
53.23
75.00
.
157884.
Mayil
July
413.00
489.20
August
575.00
410.63
September
98.04
328.58
October
November
189.68
531 '5
132.26
1 6
2 5.
December 2�.103:94 1.930.52
—Ili. 3 7 -$3,y
Paid out in cash for gas .............. 5.00
$3, .3
Available Funds as of December 31, 1974 703.51
Revenue is derived from donations from churches, civic clubs, veterans
organizations, businesses and individuals.
Expenditures provide for annual Christmas baskets to families and food,
medical supplies, lodging, gasoline for transportation, medical services
and other goods and services for the needy.
Room for Neighborhood Center is furnished by Methodist Church.
Utilities are paid for by Lake County Action Agency.
We administereJ a Migrant and a Resident Food Program that was
funded through LCAA in the !amount of $1300. This is a government
sponsored program this is now depleted.
Community churches take one month during ye to fill food shelf for
emergencies. They do this through food and%or money.
LEGAL NOTICE
Notice, .is hereby given to all concerned
that the City Council of the City of
Clermont, Florida shall hold a I>ubl.i.c
Hearing .in the Council. Chambers located
on the corner of 19est- Avenue and Desoto
Streets on 9'uesday, January 28, 1975 at -.
P.M. for Lhe following purposes:
To consider application by T. L. W00ts0n
for a Variance to Section 26-60 of: the Zoning
Ordinance (I:Ixisting Lots) on property owned
by him and described as
Lot- 10, Pi.necrest•
All interested parties will be given an
opportunity to express their views on the
above mentioned matter.
ins, i.t-,y Manager
January 23, 1975 City of Clermont-, Florida
To Tnr ZONING DOARo UP AI?JUST141-h-i
OF THE CITY OF �UJUIgNT, FLQRIVA
Gentlemen:
i "Op
Having po_,ted tlin nece nary e,ppeai fee in the amount of
with the laity C1crk, 1 hereby make application to your Board for
relief from a decision rendered by the Building official of the City
of Clermont, vihereby 1 west refused permission to
Repair ( ), Add to ( ), Ali.er (;, Construct (0, Move and Place O,
a building on lotfs
Block + Subdivision , >
in the City of Cler'm:nnt, Florida.
The reason given by the B"llding official for the decision in
refusing to issue a building perrdt is
Non -Conforming Lot
My appeL•l to your Board ia: J)st:d on my contention that this
decision creavis a havdshir on me Far the following reason, or reasons
This lot was purchased from Carrie Morris without knowledge
of recent inacted ordinances pertaining to lot area and certain
restrictive setbacks and frontage necessary. We can conform to
all necessary requirements except the frontage of seventy-five
feet.
All necessary floor plans, plot plans, and other pertinent
information are attached hereto.
Dated /- a �••-----_..
Very truly yours,
��,ri5ri.ur� ; .•�i S
,tj1A1NCt'ILj) ,IVr,
410 S7
MINLJ7'h5 M 1113
SPI,CIAI, MUTIHf,
A Special Mootinq of the City Council of the City of Clermont was held in the office
of the City Manager on Thursday, January 30, 1975. The meeting was called to order
at 5:00 P. M. by Mayor Claude E. Smoak, Jr., with the following members present:
Councilman Blackburn, Schroedol and Oswalt. Others present wero City Manager Hopkins
and Deputy Clerk Dollar.
Mayor Smoak advised that this meeting was called at the request of the City Manager
to consider certain aspects of the Sanitary Sewer Improvements in the Minnehaha Estates.
Mr. Hopkins explained that prior to passing the initial resolution for sanitary sewer
Improvements to the Minnehaha Estates one of the requirements is to have an assessment
plat. lie stated that when the City initially entertained the idea of these improvements,
an assessment plat was provided by Michaels••Stiggins, who are no longer the City engineers,
and that since then a number of changes have taken place in ownership and other considera-
tions, it is necessary to up -date the assessment map; also that at another public hearing
which must be held, the assessments made by Michaels-Stiggins would have to be supported
by an engineer qualified to do this. He requested a directive from City Council on
how they wished to proceed with updating the assessment map and providing for the
verifications of these assessments at a public hearing.
It was the consensus of Council that it would not be necessary to hire the services
of another engineering company.
Councilman Blackburn volunteered, at no cost to the City, to review the assessment
map and verify the calculations that had been made by Michaels-Stiggins on the initial
assessment map, whereupon motion was made by Councilman Schroedel, seconded by Council-
man Oswalt and unanimously carried that the City staff proceed to update the assess-
ment plat of Minnehaha Estates; and authorized Mr. Blackburn to check and authenticate
the original figures presented by Michaels-Stiggins.
The meeting was adjourned by Mayor Smoak at 5:25 P. M.
Claude E. Smoa ,4ir,ayor
M. Do lar, Deputy Clerk