08-12-1975 Supporting DocumentsMINL rEs M 1171
kPl1WAI( tN{Ia'[ra
A R0fF,U1a1' Mr;otiry; c,l' the City Councia, of the City of Clc17uorrt was ha:1d in the
Council Cluunbor:l orr 'lttoudny, August 12, 19Y5. '1'hr; Ieut7.ng wits called to artier
at 7:30 P.M. by fdtyor C7.1-uado G,. anioak, Jr. w11;11 the followiru^ munbovs prenent:
Couneilincn liyrtil,0.11Walt, Schvc(x1el, aryl 131aekbw1r. Other officials' Present were:
City Msruiger' ilopk.lns, City Attorney L:alyd, City Clerk Carroll, City Controller
Flem.lrq„ Building Official Alagc:]., and Chief' of Police Tyrxbal. Others present
were: for. and [,It's. M. F. Ploft'siry c2', Mr. and Mr-s. f+tarvin Styles, aril the Messrs.
Jones, Nmtlin, Doub, and Wood. A representative of the Sentinal/Star was also
prenent.
'ZIn invocation was given by Councilman Byrd, followed by ropeati.r:g of the Pledge
of Aller-,Jancc in unison by those present -
The Mtnutes of the Meeting hold July 22, 1975 were approved as written.
Mr. Charles Vt. Jones appeared before Council in support of his previously written
request submitted for permission to construct a dock and boathouse on city owned
property lying between lake Shore Drive and Lake Winona adjacent to his property
at 625 Lake Shore Drive. Inquiry was made of City Attorney Baird as to the legality
of granting such permission. It was the opinion of City Attorney Baird that proper
procedure to allow such request would be for Council to vacate the portion of Lake
Shore Drive right-of-way in the entire area, not restricting such action to a portion
which would accomodate Mr. Jones only. Mayor Smoak advised Mr. Jones that numerous
easements and/or leases had been granted over previous years by the city for such
like requests, but that the legality of such city action had been questioned and
todate had not been resolved. Mayor &soak inquired of Ir. Baird as to any alternative
that Council might have at "this point and time" to consider Mr. Jones request, to
which he replied, "The only alternative that I can see is to proceed in the manner
you had agreed to proceed on Lake Shore Drive back at the end of '74- determine
whether or not it is in the public's interest to close that portion of street around
Lake Winona and actually close/vacate the right-o-way-that is the only possible
approach that I can see and still be within legal grounds." It was the opinion
of Mayor Smak "that some way could be found to accorrodate Mr. Jones request and be
legal in the framework of state statutes and city charter - receive a consideration
from the petitioner for the service which the city is going to give to him - that
there is a procedure that Mr. Baird could work out that would meet the requirements
necessary", and thereupon entertained a motion for some sort of action, if it be
Councilas desire to do so. It was brought to Council's attention by City Manager
Hopkins that street right-o-way on Crystal Lake, on Lake Shore Drive to the east and
on the north side of Lake Winona, parallels (or is the same as) the waters edge, but
in this particular case it is reflected on the tax roll as a description of property
that is not indicated on the map as being part of the street right-o-way, and thereby
it appears that this property is very different from the street right-o-way and not
a part of it. Mr. Baird agreed that this was very possible, that he had not looked
at the plat and determined the property to be a dedicated street, that he had assumed
so. It was the opinion of Councilman Blackburn that additional research was needed
in this case as well as consideration given to those persons having previously held
leases/easements which have expired and not been renewed, and he thereupon moved
that this request be tabled until a later date, until the problems can be researched,
and the motion was seconded by Councilman Oswalt and carried. Mayor Smoak voted in
opposition to the motion "only because vie haven't given the gentleman an indication
of where we stand."
Messrs. Hamlin and Doub of Teleprompter, Inc. appeared before Council in support of
their previous request for a rate increase after having submitted a cose accounting
for the City of Clermont, as requested on July 22nd. Council did not feel the report
as submitted, "isolated" metropolitan Clermont with respect to expenditures and
revenues and what effect is expected with the desired rate increase, in relation to
the other existing "subsystems" of the system as Winter Garden, Apopka, St. Cloud,etc.
N1I N UTES NQ 1.1.72
Mr. IhIO-In opin<<d t.IJd; It wall is "kOltile' ;houO fair th!A CtUy of Ciorli10nt, 11;01atcd
m much ns 1xAr;nibLA, thWit ("oul1c11 drn:.irru, anr;i Wat: !.n l.tr,:u of tak.ing a voto with
a po:IoIbll,: r(,rxctlun, )"i wui11c1 nu.ike ovi:r^/ <,r't'ort to obtain this .tnl'ormatiori
11111 Bubud.t ,,it they uv.:l;tlnr; to I,u hpi1d on AuI^uBt 2601. MrAtinrl was made by Councilman
n r �.,,;.��.�,s,.i by Com"!Ilmvu1 Ilackburn find carrie..l tYclt Uhc uvrtUcr bit poBUlxned
City Marif-tguv Ilopk.:his auhui.lttcd Irta deport truth orally urd wrrittcn, cud a copy Is
attached hr:reto.
Mayor Diloak appointed Mrs. Huth Allcu ItfAy f1ru1 CounclInrin Den Blackburn to sorve on
the, CleraiarIt-PlIn cola City/County PLarinlrq; Comunitteo. Mayor 31wak inquired of City
Manager Iloplclno an to the delay o1' the bond validation for the water Lnprovantents
and uanitasy acwev extension to Mi.nnehilur Ei}t'ates. rQr. liopk ns advioW that he had
a mect.lrilrr scheduled with Mr. Vason oil Wednesday regoa,ding the matter, that lie was
oxperiencingy Borne difficulty with tho borul attorneys in Jacksonville in that they
were not proceeding with the matter ao expcditiously as desix-Ld, anti ire would be in
contact with farmers Home in Gaincovillc regarding this matter as soon as possible.
lie further reported that Mr. Crowson would be on next meeting's agenda togive
Counite cil
an uptodate report on the engineering status, and that he would be happy t
Vason to appear also to report on the financial status.
Mayor Smoak reported he had been advised the meeting between the League of Cities
Committee and the Board of County Commissioners had been a successful one, and that
the cities were invited to present the needs of their communities to the Commission.
Ile asked that City Manager Hopkins furnish Council with a report of what he felt were
inequities existing, for their perusal and consideration at a workshop session to be
called.
Mayor Smoak announced the next order of business to be the consideration of the street
improvement request as made by Don M. McCaffrey. Mr. McCaffrey was unable to be present
in support of his request, however there was a group of property owners that would be
affected that were present in opposition to the request, aril Council was in receipt of
several petitions in opposition to the street being improved. Inquiry was made of City
Attorney Laird as to the city's legal position in the matter with regards the comrritt-
ment to Mr. McCaffrey by a fonmer City Manager that the street would be improved and
by a certain date. Attorney Baird opined that the city is not bound by any negogiations
that were entered into with Mr. McCaffrey based upon the general law that a city can-
not contract with regards the opening aril construction of a street except by council
action, and is also covered by particular points of laver as to the necessities of travel
ect. and each street considered on its own merits, and if opened, authorization coming
from regular Ordinance procedure by the City Council. He flrrther opined however, that
the city could be forced to pay an adequate consideration for the property which he
deeded to the city. It was consensus of Council that there was no need existing for
the street, but it was also consensus that a reasonable consideration should be given
Mr. McCaffrey for the property deeded by him. 6iotion was made by Councilman Byrn that
�,._.. r. Li. 1,1— 1— i—t-.— tal to inform Mr. McCaffrey that Council sees no necessit
was
Inquiry was made of Marvin Styles as to the Lake County School Board's decision with
regards certain information asked of them pertaining to use and costs of the tennis
courts located at the elementary school. rir. Styles advised the matter, to his IMOW-
ledge, had not been presented to the Board, but he agreed to present it to them at
their next meeting to be held on August 25th and reply back to Council.
City Clerk Carroll read a communication from Mr. C. A. Benedict, District Engineer of
the DOT wherein he aclvrowrledged receipt of the city's resolution regarding the proposed
MINL)ThE'S NY 1173
lootttlons o[' w.tter ba::Lw nl.onl "tat'! Ro:1,J # '1J0, uicl approclat.1Oil
folr Counci.l'u Imompt act:dors in Cho m'itt":r.
Motion wa:l rmtdr' by Counciantinn _by Coutrcl.irroll Rvi'l rnrl cnrriod Wat
the b'll1❑ iie paid.
by Councilman Blackburn. The, ORDINANCE was ream cor a occorr:t arra tlnu.L ruau.u1155 uy
City Clerk Carroll, by title only, nrd upon roll cnll vote on pas'tnro of the motion
the result was: Ayos: 13lackbtu'n, Schr'octilul, Byrd, Oswalt, ani Diioak. 9bt-al. Ayes:
Five. Nayes: None. So the OMIlIA14CE was adopted ixd the Plumber' 135-C assign d to
lt•.
,-,— r AN nimrraAM(',R IRIDER THE CODE OF
The ORDINANCE was read 1-or a secona am r ina..L reaul„L� uy —y —11% u++ v+...,
only, and upon roll call vote on passage of the motion the result was: Ayes:
Schroedel, Blackburn, and Smoak. Total Ayes: Four. Nayes: P.yrd. So the C
was adopted and the Number 136-C assigned to it.
Councilman Oswalt introduced All ORDINANCE UNDER TIE CODE OP ORDINANCES OF TI-IE CITY OF
CLERMONT, LAKE; COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING TILE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF CLU MD12
FLORIDA, REFERRED TO IN SECTION 26-1 OF APPENDIX A OP THE CODE" OF ORDINANCES: REZ014ING
THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREITI FROM R-1-A ZONING CLASSIFICATION TO C-2ZONING CLASS-
IFICATION: REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREI'lIT1: PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY:
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE: AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION and the ORDINANCE was read
for a first reading by City Clerk Carroll, by title only.
Councilman Oswalt introduced AN ORDINANCE UNDER THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT,
FLORIDA, REFERRED TO IN SECTION 26-1 OF APPENDIX A OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES: REZONING
THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN FROM R-1-A ZONING CLASSIFICATION TO M-1 ZONING
CLASSIFICATION: REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HERE4IITH: PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
PROVIDIING AN EFFECTIVE DATE: AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION and the ORDDNANCE was read
for a first reading by City Clerk Carroll, by title only.
With regards request of R. W. Waters, Chairman B1-Centennial Committee, for a bi-
centennial project contribution by the city of a location, monument and plaque to hold
a time capsule of local memorabilia, the matter was referred to City Manager Hopkins
for his recommendations regarding site, estimated coses, ect.
With regards proposal received from Richard J. Chamberlain of Revere Corporation to
evaluate the City's insurance needs and coverage, prepare specifications for bid,
receive and analyze the bids at a cost of $500.00, motion was made by Councilman
Oswalt, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried that this proposal be accepted contingent
upon approval by City Manager Hopkins of Mr. Chamberlain's insurance qualicications.
With regards the "Position Paper" developed jointly by the City Council and the Planning
and Zoning Commission from the proposed Lake County Comprehensive Plan, motion was
made by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Councilman Oswalt and carried, that it be for-
warded to the Clermont-Minneola City/County Planning Committee for their comment prior
to submission to the Board of County Commissioners.
AdOlk 0
lip
MINUTES NY 11.74
of C.lt r11Y1'I, ., Iio ,LJna aril Chief of 1'ollco 'P ndal. to
L'h argil Gbn�rose 3trecil;u nsxl rePJ.nco 11; w.il;h nth
unci.:inuln Usvrs;LL� rscconcL.rl 1.� Counc:llnian li!lrcl n.rsrl
ion bo accented, r4r. eplci.n lis aou
dvirscd they wJ.d place
on fL.s:;hint, for a 30 day trial. period firut,
In order to correct problLms in the design of the inlet aryl percolation system,
and to provide for overflow accornodations at the Seventh Dly Adverst•:Lst Church,
permission was requested to cross a city park with the overflow line in order to
intercept an existing city stores sewer line. Motion was made by Couneilsnln Byrd,
seconded by Councilman Osvalt and carried that permission be irranted.
Certification of Millage and Taxable Value for 1975 was received from Donald E.
Stephens, Lake County Tax Assessor 0 5.12 mills, Motion was madLiL CounaQmn
the millage be set at 5.12. Upon vote of the motion, the Ayes were: olacxourn
and ScYroedel. Nayes were: Byrd, Smoak, arcl Oswalt. The Motion failed to carry.
The ad valorem revenue figure was projected in the 75-76 budget 0 $195,000. Based
on the 1975 taxable value received, 0 5.0 mills there would be an increase of
$9,000 plus in the projected revenue. Motion was made by �corncilman'Byrd, seconded
Motion vras made b Councilman Schroede1 seconded b Councilman B aril carried
that an expenditure of '500 00 be included in the 75-76. budget for a tree planting
program.
The meeting was adjourned by Mayor Smoak at 10:35 P.M.
Claude G. Smoak, Jr., biayor
Lr.( l'__
Dolores W. Carroll, City Clerk
CITY MANAGER' REPORT
12 August, 1975
Finance Director
We are beginning to receive applications for the position of Finance Director.
To date we have received 18. We will continue to receive applications until
the latter part of August. John Fleming, John Greenlee and John Blanchard
have agreed to assist in the selection by evaluating all the applications
and recommending the top three to me for interview.
Landfill
Effective August 4th, the Clermont Landfill was closed. We are now hauling
our refuse to the interim Log House Road site. It appears the county will
develop a transfer system for South Lake County rather than a landfill for
the long term. It is hoped the interim facility will serve our needs until
the permanent facility is established.
r�/4/"-
Robert M. Hopkins
CITY MANAGER' REPORT
12 August 1974
Addendum 1
Swinun inr lessons
The three week Clermont swimming program which was held under the super-
vision of Tiffany Jones has been completed.
A Recap of the program is as follows:
Participants
Residents 87
Non-residents 26
Total 113
Expenses
Instructions $ Y88.50*
Revenue
Fees 335.00
Difference $ 453.50
*Estimated costs prior to program $800.00
208 Areawide Planning Advisory Committee
The 208 Committee met on August 8th in Altamonte Springs. The primary item
of business was consideration of the consultant selection procedure.
It was pointed out that the local agencies should submit their recommendations
regarding that agencies needs to the committee. The input will be considered
in the development of the detailed work program. This information should be
submitted by the first week in September.
M. 0
ins
RINAAD J. c11AMolRAIN
lWild"M
IIANAY e, MADDOX
b."'ANn vk� 1".11d„ni
i
Revere Corporation _.
115 Bent Lomon Street
Pont Office Box 674
I.AKILANI), RONDA 33002
Juno 2,1, 1975
Phone
013/600.746:
Mr, Roburt M. llopkinn RECEIVED City Manager 2 6 1975
I Went Gnte Plaza
Clermont, Florida 3271 1
Dear Mr. Hopkins:
Over the last twenty-five years I have observed with interest the
various methods of insurance purchase employed by municipalities
and other public entities.
As we both know, many public bodies use a Committee of local
insurance agents, sonic use internal personnel to draw specifications
and receive and analyze bids and still others employ a professional
Consultant.
I have had experience with all of the foregoing methods of insurance
purchase and have in the past felt that the Committee approach was the
most logical since there was not available in the immediate geographic
area a well qualified consulting operation.
Certainly a consultant coming from a considerable distance is at a
distinct disadvantage clue to his lack of familiarity with the region and
local conditions.
The Revere Corporation does operate an insurance agency in the City
of Lakeland but is also prepared to serve in a consulting capacity for
various public bodies within our immediate geographic area. The con-
sulting fee of course is individually negotiated depending upon the scope
of work to be performed.
I would very much like to hear from you as regards your present method
of placing insurance and if there be any interest on your part in discussing
the consulting concept, I will be happy to meet with you at your convenience
for an initial discussion.
Very truly yours,
-- RT: REVECORP03TION
Richard-J. Chamberlain
RCVCPC Corporation
i
115 No Lolnon 5troart
Pont nffico (Pox 1174
I.ArRAND, I'LOPIDA 331102
PICnAPD 1, CHAMBULAIN Phono
N'11'1 0 813/680-7465
HANDY 0. MADDOX
r"—IN" vice Nold.M
.luly '1.7., 1975
RECEIVED J U L 2 9 1975
Mr. Robert M. Hopkins,
City Manager,
City of Clermont,
#1 West Gate Plaza,
Clermont, Florida 32711
Re: Consulting Agreement
Dear Bob:
I appreciate the time you spent with me on my recent
visit giving mn a tour of the City of Clermont and the
opportunity to review very briefly your existing insurance
coverages.
As you and I discussed at that time, I feel that a considerable
amount of work should be done on the overall insurance ex- i.
posures of the City of Clermont. primarily aimed at eliminating
some currently uninsured exposures as well as evaluating the
insurance requirements on items presently covered.
I would suggest that we enter into a three year consulting
agreement under which terms 1 will draw specifications
and receive and analyze bids and work in a continuing
capacity with you on the overall exposure, risk management,
and insurance program for the City of Clermont. Under this
arrangement I feel that it would be almost essential that the
specifications be drawn and bids received in general along Q
the lines of existing coverage but with the possibility of I
some modification based on preliminary decisions. Following
the award initially of the insurance program, I feel that
considerable further modifications and negotiations with C
carriers would be necessary in order to effectively protect I`
the interest of the City of Clermont.
Mr, Robert rvi. Ilnpicinn,
July U, 1775
Under the terms of a three year cunnulting acreement, my
fees would be $1,000 annually.
In the alternate, I would be perfectly happy to draw
specifications and receive and analyze bids ou a single
shot basis for your renewal coverages for a fee of $500.
If there in interest on your part in proceeding along these
lines, please advise and we will be glad to work with you
on either of the foregoing arrangements.
As you are aware, I am currently developing the loss
information to be, included in this year's specifications.
Very truly yours,
REV ERE CORPORATION
i
RJC:mb Richard J. Chamberlain
��ilri r1� 0/"/,1)101it
t0 I Waal CBtlu Plain ■ Clonnanl, Florida 32111 ■ Phono; (004) 304.3141
August 13, 1975
Mr. Richard J. Chamberlain
Revere Corporation
P. 0. Box 874
Lakeland, Florida 33802
Dear Mr. Chamberlain:
At their meeting last evening, the City Council considered your proposal
for insurance consulting services.
The de
of
specifi-
cations approved thesal to cifi-
0
Please prepare the necessary agreement. We would also like to have
information regarding your insurance qualifications as well as those
of the Revere Corporation.
Looking forward to hearing from you in the near future.
TO City Council 4,
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Lake County Comprehensive Plan
DATE: August 7, 1975
At their meeting on August 5, 1975 the Planning and Zoning Commission
considered the "Position Paper" draft developed by the City Manager.
The P & Z Commission is in agreement with the "Position Paper" and that it
should be considered by the Board of County Commissioners before
adoption of the Lake County Comprehensive Plan - Land Use Element.
A copy of the "Position Paper" is attached.
Attachment /
cc: City Clerk Agenda w/attachment 8/12/75
Building Officialw/attachment
LAKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT
The Clermont Planning and Zoning Commission and the ClermontCity Council have
reviewed the Lake County Comprehensive Plan -Land Use Plan Element with particular
attention given to Section 6, General Plan Policies, and the portion of Section
7, Plan Specifics, which apply to the Clermont-Minneola Urban Area.
As a result of the review, the City Council has developed the following position
which should be taken into com,ideration by the Board of County Commissioners
prior to adoption.
Clermont - Minneola Urban Area
i
STATEMENT_
The Clermont area is Lake County's largest urban area in the Southern portion
of the County. Being situated on US 27 and SR 50 it is probably physically
associated more with Orange County than other portions of Lake County.
COMMENT
The statement regarding Clermont's physical association with Orange County
seems to a generally accepted philosophy among many, particularly those in the
northern portion of the county. It is Clermont's position that South Lake
County relates as much to the rest of Lake County, particularly the Leesburg
i
and the Golden Triangle areas, as it does to Orange County. It appears that the
second sentence of the statement should be reworded so as to turn the thinking
away from Orange County and to Lake County.
2
STATEMENT
The largest of the C1eniont Chain of Lakes is Lake Louisa. It is somewhat separted
from the urban area, there being very little nearby in the way of development.
It is recommended that special efforts be afforded to protect Lake Louisa from
urban encroachment.
COMMENT
While Clermont agrees that Lake kuisa should be protected, there is a general
feeling that urban development in the Lake Louisa area is desirable. A
considerable amount of uplands exist which is desirable for development.
To say that every little development has or is taking place in the area 1s not
i
totally accurate. The Vacation Village and the Quail Roost developments are
evidence of Major development. In addition, the Hidden Lakes Estates
development that has received preliminary plat and other approvals is evidence
of continued interest and activity in.the area.
POLICY 2
Discourage any new Major development proposed on SR 50 outside of theuurban
boundaries, and restrict driveway and street intersections with SR 50, US 27
and SR 561 by establishing strict standards of spacing between street intersections
and driveways in order not to inhibit traffic flow.
COMMENT
i
It is Clermont's position that the same restrictive standards for SR 50 and US 27 do
not and should not apply to SR 561. It is further felt that "major development" I
and "urban boundaries" should be clarified.
POLICY 4
Pratezit prime citrus land within the urbanizing area.
COMMENT
Clarification of Policy 4 is considered necessary. The terms °protect, "prime" AuD
• _ 3 _
"urbanizing area" 'leave too much room for interpretation
POLICY 6
Encourage clustered commercial development East of US 27 on;SR 50.
COMMENT ,
Policy 6 appears to be in conflict with Policy 2. Policy 2 proposes to discourage
"major" development on SR 50 while Policy 6 proposes to encourage clustered
commercial development on SR 50. Both Policy 2 and Policy 6 need clarification.
POLICY 8
Assist and encourage the development of low and moderate income housing opportunities
by compilation of a housing plan, housing assistance plan and by supporting
local, State and Federal programs for assistance to housing development in
this Node.
COMMENT
Strong feeling exists against Policy 8.
POLICY 10
Assist in the elimination of urban bl4ghrlt in Clermont and Minneola
COMMENT
Clarification of Policy 10 is considered necessary. The term"blight" needs to be
defined.
I
i
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Signal light - 8th & Montrose Streets
DATE: August G, 1976
We have investigated the feasibility and desirability of removing
the traffic signal at 8th & Montrose Streets and erecting stop
signs for traffic control.
Attached is a memo dated July 19, 1975 from Police Chief Tyndal
providing his continents.
It is recommended that Council authorization be given to make the
traffic control changes as outlined by Chief Tyndal.
Attachment 'R. M. 4o?�ns�
cc: City Clerk, w/attachment Agenda 8/12/75
City Attorney w/attachment
Police Chief w/attachment
ROl1GRT 7PKIN9 DOLORIA 0ARIkOLL PRP.NTI ' VDAL
Ch ger Clty Clerk Chid ce
POLICE DEPARTMENT
CLERMONT, FLORIDA
"gem of the Hilli"
TO 1 City Manager
FROMt Chief of Police
u^UBJI:C1'. Signal. Light - 8th Street 0 Montrose Street
DA'lUt July 19, 1975
Please be advised that I have made a study on the traffic light at eth and
Montrose Street since receiving your memo dated June 30, 1975.
Due to loss traffic in the downtown area and also duo to the up -keep on the
light, I believe that stop signs would control traffic at that intersection.
Montrose Street should be a through street going cast and west and 8th Street
should be a stop street in order.to install the stop signs. one parking
space on each side of 8th Street would have to be eliminated for the signs
to be placed. Also on Bth Street on both sides of Montrose, a cross -walk
should be painted. _
If I can be of any further assistance -in this matter, please advise.
Prentice Tyndal -
Chief of Police
PT/rs
TO: Chief of Police
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Signal Light - 8th E Montrose Streets
DATE: August 13, 1975
At their meeting last evening, the City Council approved changing
the traffic control device from signal light to stop signs.
Please place the light on flashing for the next 30 days - red
for 8th Street and amber for Montrose Street.
At the and of the 30 days,we will decide whether to proceed with the
installation of the stop signs and removal of the light.
R. M. Hopkins
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: SDA Church Drainage System
DATE: August 8, 1975
On October 22, 1974 the City Council adopted Resolution 242 which granted
the Seventh Day Adventist Church a Conditional Use Permit to construct a
church at the corner of Minnehaha Avenue and fast Avenue.
Item 5 of the CUP required, in part, that "the project shall incorporate on -
site retention to accommodate rainfall of maximum intensity based on a
five year interval for the Central Florida area and overflow accommodaton"
We have received preliminary plans to correct certain problems in the design
of the inlet and percolation system and to provide for overflow accommoda-
tions by intercepting an existing storm sewer line in the city park. -
Attached is a copy of a memo dated August 9, 1975 from the Building Official
recommending acceptance.
In order to cross the city park property with the line, Council approval
is requested.
A set of the plans are on file at City Mall for inspection and will be
available at the Council meeting.
t'J
R. RM.
R. M. fo ns
Attachment
cc: City Attorney w/attachment
Building Official
City Clerk Agenda 8/12/75
TO: City Manager
FROM: Building Official
SUBJECT SDA Church Drainage System
DATE: August 8, 1975
Preliminary plans have been submitted for changes to the original on
site water retention facility. The changes relocate the facility from
the city alleyway to church property. I
The overflow accommodation heretofore not provided in the engineering
plans are now proposed to follow a course due west and north for a
distance of approximately 192 feet through a city park at which point
it will intercept a city storm sewer line which flows into Lake Sunnyside.
All work will be done by qualified contractors with approved materials ;
and good workmanship practices under certified engineer's supervision.
I recommend acceptance of the preliminary plans for the changes and
the addition of the overflow facility. �.
MW
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: 75 /6 Budget
DATE: August: 5, 1975
Attached is Donald Stephens' Certification of Millage for the City of
Clermont.
The 1975-76 budget needs to be finalized including the passage of a
resolution setting the millage.
Our timetable is as follows:
Council Meeting Action
August 12 Finalize budget
Set millage
August 19 Millage Resolution
1st Reading Budget Ordinance
August 28 Publish budget ordinance
in Local newspaper j
September 16 Final Reading - Budget Ordinance ,
Effective in 10 days
ins
Attachment
cc: City Clerk w/attachment Agenda 8/12/75 /
Controller w/attachment
DONAI D E, STl PHENS
Lake Count e Tax Assessor
� dommMl'9Y7,.rl 7111� .. ■ v,,,nan,v.,.,>......... .......+«� .n ..w...-s n,..,,,.....wr�,.nns,+.�w w.+ww.•
....rr.. 1'. !1. 11OX 111,7 '1'il 1'AIUi.4, PUM104 :I27111
July 25, 1975 g 1979
uEq�uL 2
City of ClermontG�
Mr. Robert Hopkins, City Manager
Clermont City Hall
1 Westgate Plaza
Clermont, Fla. 32711
Dear Mr. Hopkins:
Enclosed is your certified millage rate for the 1975 taxable year.
If this Board elects to exceed said millage it will be necessary to
go through the advertising procedure as required. If this millage
is satisfactory, please adopt said millage and return a copy of your
Resolution setting said millage to me within the next 30 days.
If you have any questions concerning this, please feel free to
contact me.
Very truly yours,
C
Donald E. Stephens, CFA
Lake County Property Appraiser
DES:jc
Enclosure
r 420 4z0 (;upy M1nnlh
h�75
s CI;II'I'Il'ICA'I'UIN M" 1111,1, V;K .1NO T 1X 11111{ %, 1III V.
I�f;I,I IJiv; N'I'.1'I'Is.111;V'I' of., :11)1)I'1IONS VND DEH"TIONS
: Gonnly, Florida
Cf.0 MONT
TO
(Nnnut of Taxhrq Anlhnrily)
(I1 1075 Taxable Value of Roal Property for Operatlnq Purposas $ T 35,813,3,690
(2) 1075 Taxahln Value of Personal Properly for Operating Purposns $ 5,337,760
(3) 1975 Taxable Value of Centrally Assessed Property for Operating $ 119'-221
Purposes
(4) 1975 Gross Taxable Value ( I ) 1- (2) + (3) $ 41 ,270,67'1
(5) Plus 1975 Funded Cxen)ptluns: Senior Homestead 1Fj104,n31131ht) F s l $ —1 ,619,860
(6) Additional Disability Ifj190,031(3)(bI,F,5.1 $ 71 ,140
(7) 1975 Effective Taxable Valuo $ 42,961 ,671
(4) 1- (5) 4 (G) for all taxing authorities except School Boards.
Ignore lines (5) and (6) for School Boards,
(8) Less: Now Construction and Additions $ 3,364,060
(9) (Deletions $ 0 )
(10) Net New Value (0) — (9) $ 3,364,060
(I I 1975 Adjusted Taxable Value (7)—(10) $ 39,597,611
(12) 95%of Adjusted Taxable Value (I1) x .95 $ 37,617,730
(13) 1974 Gross Taxable Value $ 35,970,545
(14) Plus 1974 Funded Exemption: $ 1543,960
Senior Homestead 1g196.031(3)(a),F.5.1
(15) 1974 Effective Taxable Value $ 37,514,505
(13) + (14) for all taxing authorities except School Boards.
Ignore line (14) for School Boards.
(16) 1974 Operating Millage Levy $ 5.13 Per $1,000
(17) 1974 Ad Valorem Proceeds (15) x (16) $ 192,449.41
(18) Millage Levy on 1975 Taxable Value Necessary to
Raise Revenue Equivalent to 1974 Ad Valorem
Proceeds plus 5%, plus taxes on Net New Value
(17) / (12) $ 5.19 Per $1,000
I do hereby certify the values shown herein to be correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Witness my
hand and official signature at Tavares , Florida this the 5th day of
July 19 75
Property Appraiser
INSTRUCTIONS:
A. Complete Ili is form in Iriplicate. Copy one (1 ) to taxing an hurity; copy two (2) retained by property Appraiser: copy
Ihrce (3) to Ad Valorem Tax Division, Department of Revenuc,
R. All 5lillage figure, and taxable values used must apply only In the taxing:nuhorily indicated. Use separate forms for
each dependent laxing authority. Certify only for operating levies.
C. lint vies for items 11), (2), (3), (5), (6),(8).(9), (13), (14) and (16) are to be supplied by the property Appraiser using
tan roll data. Remaining entries are to he calculated as indicated.
1). IAII'ORTANT: For multi - cotnm y lasing authorities, the P-perly Appraiser shall not complete line ( 18). The Appraiser
will forward copies one ( I) and Ihrce (3) to the Department since the Department is responsible for Certification to
,milli -county districts,
TO: City Council
FRO14: City Manager
SUBJECT: Street Improvement• Request - McCaffrey
DATE: June 19, 1975
In 1969 the City started acquiring casements for the sanitary sewer system.
In lleu of granting an casement, Don and Pat McCaffrey deeded some property
to the city with an understanding that the property be used as street
right-of-way with improvements made at no cost to the McCaffroys.
Attached is the following supporting mal.crial:
1. Deed dated October 20, 1969
2. Letter from Mr. Johnson dated December 30, 1969
3. Drawing showing the property which was deeded to the City.
On June 13, 1975 Mr. McCaffrey verbally requested that the city make the
improvements.
A search of the Council minutes does not indicate any authorization for this
commitment. Mr. Johnson has stated that he can't recall any specific
-- council action, but does not believe he would have made such a commitment
without the Council's permission.
By copy of this memo, the City Attorney is being requested to ascertain
the City's legal obligation and standing in this matter.
Council direction will be appreciated.
ins
Attachments /
cc: City Clerk w/attachments Agenda 7/15/75 ✓✓✓
City Attorney w/attachments
MOWS WIT MAINI IWI,o
74
1 j 11 �\ TU7H6 A111 i rlx ( •,
low 'Ile
°L
I °
t� Ilorluthis ;Ilth
rlrrlt of nc robe/' , .1. l), /tl
RIV1111rell
DONALD M. hlc(1Al;l:ltl:Y and PATRICIA A. McCAFFRRY, his wife,
i of ill$, (burly of
hako ood,4totI,of I:1or1da lutrll/n/'llrr/iml//rut,
II aro!
I ('Ill: CITY OF Cl,lilt�lON'I', FLORIDA, n nnulicipal corporation,
Ill' Montrose 7itreet, Clermont ,
I•;tke of ill,, County of
unrl Rlolr of 1:1 or i da pally of the .vrrro d purl,
111itlil'lilipfil. /hot I/rr avrid port,/ ol• thr 111'st port, /'a• anr/ in "''
(lit'" llI/----------------TEN AND Noll 00•----------------_---- !hrllarn—
irr bond /xri,lhpllrr,euid/,nrlpo/' Most
ron,l/Jorl.11rrrWrvi/Jlo-hrvro/'i..•Lrrrht/rtrlvrorrl, �..
d_rd, lraa rrnri,ti,vl, rrlro. Co` nod eloilr•l"rilnrrl, ortrl by lhrm. lo•e•sr•ols ,lu, nvnisr,
rr/rra�•r rrn,l grrilr/ninr rur/u //rr ,emir/. port// ul'lhrs"r oml /Jtl/•/ all /hr ri_///, till"•, inlrr•rst
brim, onrl dr•nurod whirl, thr S,fhl, pnr•1Il o/' //r llnel pru•t httie ill and to //,I, l%/lluuin,7
doscribed h/l , pirre or porrrt of• /;m,l, ,siloolr lying turd. ljei/tg' in the ('ounlll Olt'
bake slat". of Morida, to tail:
The Bast thirty (30) feet of. Lots A, B, C, and D, in Cm
Oak View Subdivision,
AND ALSO, begin at a point on the Southern Right -of-
I
Way line of Minnehalia Avenue that is twenty (20) feet
East of the Northeast (iNli) corner of Lot A in Oak View
Subdivision, proceed Southerly and parallel to the
1:astcr1y lot lines of the above mentioned Lots A, B, C
and D, to a point that is due Bast' of tilt, Southern
(tight-ol'-IVay I ire of ttal. Urivc; thence Nest to ;Ipoint
that is due South of the• Southeast (SE) corner of Lot D,
thence Northerly along said Eastern lot lines of A, B,
C, and 11 to the Northeast (Nli) corner of I.ot A, thence
Bust to I',U.B., all according to the Official Map of
the City of Clermont filed I:ebruary 4, 192E and re-
I' corded in plat Book 8, pages 17 to 23, both inclusive,
Public Records of Lake County, Florida.
111 ialle alit) to U1111 1hr sru/rr, lnsrlhrr mill, all caul sin_''Iltor• th,•
ol,/on/rnor •r.e lhr•rron/o hr/nncin{' or in ,rngri.er r11/perloinin-6, on,/ 0/1 Me nch,lr•.
i_ 11. lilt, • ;Werrst /ro,l r•hrrrn 11-hol•vorrrr ,Jl' th'..acrid pro tat of tlrr. JlJ
port. ,e/ prat, rillao in
10 1•crr or equity, to the unlit piolorr it se, hrofy/l nod hrlroof oJ'tlre staid parllr o/' , .}rt ontl .
7111 IT-lituptili ITIjterraf, /hr soid part// of the. /irct part has h, ,, ynlo .vc! Ili,;
/churl, rur.rl seal the, Hall and yeorlirsl aborr rrrillrrt.
Q(211
, �innrl, +�ralrl nut 17rliurrril in }u•rarnrr uf: /
t
It
— -- — �5
C
UKINE
" FLORIDA'S FlNEST
RESORT -RESIDENTIAL
COMMUNITY
Oecember 30, 1969
Mr. D. M. Mccaffrey
c/o Airko Mfg. Co.
Clermont, Florida
Dear Mr. McCaffrey:
Please accept my sincere thanks for the street
right-of-way, valued at $4,200.00, which you deeded to us
sometime ago. The right -of -lay to which I refer is
described as the East thirty feet of Lots A, B. C. and D,
Oakview Subdivision and the adjacent twenty feet lying
directly east of said lots A. 11. C. and D.
In consideration of this contribution the City of
Clermont will, within three years from this date and
without expense to you, improve and/or construct a street
within the limits of the above described right-of-way.
Again thanking you for your cooperation in this
matter, I am
Very truly yours,
i A. M1 J,bhnsdn
AMJ:md
City 1 1.1nager
/
3mK ymveNA(/h'
� .
�
August 7, 1975
We, the undersigned, homoownern in the Sunny Doll Manor,
wish o present our tweentMinnehaha Drive baindtHook Street, ions to the peronsingthe ronnned wends ofnv to ��e our
streets.
Listed below arc some of these objections:
1. The present dead end atroets are safer for our children and
pets.
2. A road
ithat
location would
noon be a hot rod alloy between
CLervue nri
3. It is unfair for pronarty owners adjoining the proposed road
to have to pay 1/3 of the cost for a road built solely to
enhance one mans property.
'4. It is totally unnecessary; nronesamowners on the affected
streets have not asked for. it, e
ownhouses because of the quiet dead end street.
5. The city has better uses for the estimated $40,000 to $500000
it would cost to put in the street.
6. The runoff of water from an elevated road would endanger homes.
adjoining as well as add to the present problems on Hook Street.
NAME
_ADDRESS
J
AulSunt 7, 1975
We, the undoraigned, homeownern in the Sunny Dell. Manor,
wish to present our oecions to the
Drive bcaindtHook Street, perossinl5rthe wendsoof��be-
tween
streets.
Listed below arc some of those objections:
1. The present dead end streets are safer for our children and
pets.
2. A road in Chat location would Bonn be. a hot rod alley between
Clervue Drive-in and MacDonaldn.
3. it is unfair for property owners adjoining the vrovosed road
to have to pay 1/3 of the cost for a road built solely to
enhance one man's vroverty.
4. It is totally unnecessary; nroperty
owners
ownero the affected
streets have not asked for it.
ir
houses because of the quiet dead end street.
5. The city has better uses for the estimated $40,000 to $50,000
it would cost to out in the street.
6. The djoiningfasfwellwater
asfrom
add to theelevated
presentroad
nroblemsendanger
Hook Street.
`jADDRESS
i
August 7, 1975
Wo, the undersigned, homeowners in the Sunny Dell Acres area,
wish to present our objections to the proposed roadway to run be-
tween MinnehahaDrivo and Hook Street, crossing the and of our streets.
Listed below are some of these objections:
1. The present dead and streets are safer for our children and
pets.
2. A road in that location would soon be a hot rod alley between
Clor-Vuo Drive-in and MacDonnlds.
3. It is unfair for property owners adjoining the proposed road
to have to pay 1/3 of the cost for a road built solely to
enhance one man's vroporty.
4. It is totally unnecessary; property owners on the affected
streets have not asked for it. Some owners bought their houses
because of the quiet dead end street.
5. The city has better uses for the estimated $40,000 to $50,000
it would cost to put in the street.
6. The runoff of water from an elevated road would endanger homes"
next to it as well as add to the present problems on Hook St.
NAME ADDRESS
-Ail/L U'// a - •.L..u:�Q'/t'iun l l G ) .un-,n il- ,-/CvC� ✓L . .
�Gc,L,2w z— J21y< r l G lclieSl '��G
31 �ofR�L.
789 Pine Lane
Clermont, Pla. 32711
Mr. Hobart Hopkins, City Manager
Clermont City Hall
Westgate Plaza,
Clermont, Fla. 32711
Dear Mr. Hopkinst
I wish to go on record to clarify my position
concerning the building of a planned service road,
Millhouse road, which is adjacent to my property
at 789 Pine Lane in Clermont, Plorida.
Lot C, less 30 feet, Oak Hill subdivision, was
spurchased everallots in this �ssubdivision, but 58, at which eI chose lothcioe of
because I reasoned that someday, when the planned road
would be built, I would then have a more valuable
corner lot.
For the past 17 years, I have cared for, that
Is cleaned, weeded and mowed about 20 feet of the
East side of my property, because of the weed situation.
I assumed throughout the years that I was caring for city property
since the plans shown me by the city 1n 1958 showed
Millhouse Road.
It was not until recently, while reading the
South Lake Press that I realized that the formulations
of plans to complete Millhouse road are in effect. I wish
to strongly disapprove the building of a SERVICE
road to simply serve the purpose of the commercial property
adjacent to the East side of both Oak Hill and Sunny Da le
Manor Subdivisions, which for so many years have enjoyed
the quiet atmosphere of dead end street neighborhoods.
The building of a service road would bring undesireable
traffic and populace, and thereforw reduce the value of
this entire neighborhood.
Since I have cared for the 20 feet just east of my
property for so many years, I would like to now have a
right of way which would permit me to drive my rs
into existing carport on my property.
(Si Yl
`(1+its B. Montiver
744 Sunny Dell Drive
Clermont, Florida 32711
August 7, 1975
RECEIVED AUG a 1979
Mr. Robert Hopkins, City Manager
City Hall
Clermont, Florida 32711
Dear Mr. Hopkins:
My wife and I wish to go on record an opposing a proposed
road from MinnebabaDrive to Hook Street. In addition to the cost
to the city, it would benefit only one man's property which is
already served by the service road parallel to Rt. 27.
Furthermorb, we object to having to pay 1/3 of the cost of
the used as it passes our property for the dubious "priviledge"
of having care travel at a level enabling them to look into our
windows.
Since drive-intheater, oursaado not need additional the
additionalcontributions,
yards
And however convenient it would be for movie-goers to be able to
"hot -rod it" from the drive-in directly to MacDonalds, adjoining
homeowners would not appreciate having their sleep interrupted.
We would also prefer that the large trees shielding us from
a view of the drive-in screen remain where they are.
We have spoken with the city's attorney and with Mayor Smoak -
and Councilman Oswalt about this matter. Since we will be on vacat-
ion during the next council meeting, we will be unable to attend.
Please take our objections under consideration and bring thie letter
to the attention of the council.
Sincerely yours,
Kenneth D. Reed
RECEIVED AUG ? ^ '975
FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH
700 HOOK 5T. . p, O, UOX U13 • CLrOMOW, VLOR1OA 32711
............. n,:oioorie. ann an:r�
JAW'.'. .^. CLICK. J.. ors :,: 304,3n03
Mirrintn it
August 8, 1975
Doar Mr. Mayor and council momborat
It has boon brought to our attention hero at First Christian
that efforts are being made to open a street between us and the
Clervue Drive -In Theater.
On behalf of the church board of elders and deacons we want
to go on record as being opposed to such a move. We will be happy
to discuss our reasons for opposition to the new road with you or
the council at any time.
Sincerely, _...
R. E. Douglass
Trustee
Gerald Wood
Board Chairman
r
Florida Department of Transportation
IIfUIIIN O'U, A!INI'.W C� TWA WIAIIII i11, 51:CIiCTA11Y
()VI:
P. 0. Box 47 t.
DoLand, Florida 32720
August 5, 1975 RECEIVEDAUO 6 1975
Ms. Dolores W. Carroll, City Clerk
City of Clermont
iil West Gate Plaza
Clermont, Florida 32711 y
Re: State Project No. 11070-1510 1
SR 50, Drainage Basins I'
1
Dear Ms. Carroll:
l,.
This is to acknowledge receipt of Resolution No. 259
as adopted by the City Council of Clermont on July
22, 1975. With this we will proceed with the design
of the drainage basin within the area designated in.
the resolution.
1_
Thank you for your quick action on this matter.
t'.
Sincerely, I,
C. A. Benedict, P.E. !,
District Engineer
Er
CAB/AJB:bw
t
1,
I-
ARRIVE AIIVE' I
FLORIDA,
ACCOUNTS PAYAIILII - AUGUST 1975
GENERAL FUND
A A 1, Automotive fiorvlco
(Tubon & Alignments)
38.00
Armstrong Smith Paints
(Primer -Paint -Sandpaper)
21.27
Bob Wade Ford
(Vehicle Gaskets)
.49
Callaghan 4 Company
(Reference Rooks)
315.00
Carroll Gas
(Gus)
3.50
Casoy's 'Power Service
(Radio 'Power Installation)
500.00
Central Ind.Salos,Inc,
(U-Bolt)
1.4.25
Clermont Auto Parts,Inc.
(Vehicle f, Equip.Ropair Parts)
60.02
Clermont R1drs.Supply,Inc.
(Concrete)
103.40
Clermont Medical Center
(Prisoner Exponso)
30.00
Dust-T'ox Service
(Janitorial Supplies)
14.60
D f, B Fifth Street Grocery
(Prisoner Supplies)
4.20
Engel's
(Police Uniform)
9.95
Gem Chemical Co.
(Janitorial Supplies)
11.80
Hilltop Stationery
(Office Supplies)
156.26
Hunt's Garden Center
(Swan Feed P, Chlordane)
7.09
Jas.H.Matthews Co.
(Memorial)
180.00
Jim Willis Hardware
(Nylon Line)
14.40- -I
J $ B Slurry Seal
(Slurry Seal)
12,966.90
Kar Products,Inc.
(Auto Repair Parts)
90.05
Lake Communications
(Radio Repair)
26.50
Lakeland Batteries
(Batteries)
60.50
Lake Apopka Natural Gas
(Utilities)
25.00
Lanier Business Products
(Supplies f, Annual Maint.)
211.98
Mobil Oil Corp.
(Petroleum Products)
1,195.75
Morgan's Auto Parts
(Auto G Equip.Repair Parts)
107.94
Motorola,Inc.
(Base Station & Antenna)
3,709.50
Motorola,Inc.
(Monthly Radio Maintenance)
105.50
Nolan Engine & Mower
(Bearings)
4.00
Orlando Paving
(Asphalt Mix)
292.90
Prescott Tractor Sales
(Equip.Repair Parts)
60.07
Sentinel/Star
(Advertising)
39.60
Shelfer Ford Tractor Co.
(Repair Parts)
19.80
South Lake Press
(Publishing $ Printing)
111.72
Scotty's
(Hoes and Rake)
18.23
Tampa Tribune -Times
(Advertising)
24.65
Western Auto Store
(Flashlight Batteries)
14.80''
Winter Gardon Chryalor/Plymouth (Rainy)
13.75
W, M. 'foal
(01eaol Pull) 148.00
(Monthly Malnt.1; Ropaira) 173.00
Wood Heating li Cooling ( Y
20,904.37
D'I'ILI'I'IES DEPARTMENT
Allied Chlorins
(Chlorine)
300.00
Brownell Llectro,Inc,
( Y• li Surface Mount)
Itula n
19.32
(Water Haters)
326.06
IS li II sales
C'ontxnl P1n.Pirs Lquip.Co.
(Chlorine Cannistorn)
0.75
Clermont Auto Parts
(Auto (, Equip.Ropair Parts)
27.03
(.1nnitorial Supplies)
49.50
Gom Chemical
Ililltop Stationery
(Office Supplies)
2.45
Ilughos Supply,Inc.
(Pipo,f:lls C, Nipples)
312.49
Kennedy Company
(Equipment Maintenance)
41.70
Leesburg Armature
(Generator Terminal Board
6Pump Repair
o4G.27
Moffatt Bearing
(Bearings)
9.29
Morgan s Auto tarts
Auto Repair Parts)
( P
27.38
Orlando Laboratories
(Chemical Determinations)
73.00_____...-
South Lake Pumping Service
Lift Station Pump -outs)
100.00
Sta-Con,Inc.
(Pressure Switch)
63.70
Western Auto Store
(Wrench)
5.49
1,913.43
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Annexation - Bob Wade
DATE: August 4, 1975
Attached is a petition from Bob Wade for voluntary annexation.
The next stop in the annexation process is to adopt a non -emergency ordinance
to annex the property and to redefine the boundary lines of the city.
The ordinance shall be passed after it has been published once a week
for four consecutive weeks in the Local newspaper.
The adopted ordinance will then be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit
Court and the Department of State.
It is recommended that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare the
necessary ordinance.
R. 'Ho inFsVill3
cc: City Clerk w/attachment Agenda 8/12/75
City Attorney w/attachment
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION
Petition is hereby made to the City Council of the City Of Clermont, Lake
County, Florida by Mr. Bob Wade, 1363 Lake Shore Drive, Clermont, Florida for
the annexation of the following described property to the City of Clermont
Lot 23 and the East 1/2 of Lot 26 Section 29S,
Range 26E as shown on Lake Highlands Company plat
Field J, Plat Book 2, Page 25, Public Records of
Lake County, Florida
It is my understanding that all municipal services will be iimnediately available
to the property except sanitary sewer service.
In order to get water service extended to the property, a tapping fee will
be required. The tapping fee is $1980.00 based on $3/front foot times the
660 feet of property frontage. The tapping fee shall be paid prior to the
extension being made.
Sanitary sewer service is not available and is not necessary at this time.
It is my understanding that the estimated cost to extend the service at this
time to the drainage area which includes my property is $42,500.00. I am
in agreement with the city that it is not economically feasible to extend
the service at this time since my facilities will be the only user. I am in
agreement with the city's plans to extend sanitary sewer service at such time
that it is considered economically feasible.
Construction of a new and used car dealership has been started on the property.
Since it wll take approximately sixty (60) days to complete the annexation
requirements, I agree to bear all costs for temporary service such as temporary
water for construction should the city agree to provide the service.
I am the sole owner of the property for which this annexation is being
requested.
Witness:
Bobo eae
G
X
Dintributud to Council fl-4-75
!
GREATER (::LORMONT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, �
JrrrAiNr Civir dmGranum
j n, o mr. ut pp,..;. a:�r•rrur
aw•zan
I) fi
Clermont, P901111u 32711
July 211, I1)7;i
TO: Ilonol•abIC Claude li. Smoak, Jr., NEN1111:11S ON CI,EIIMON'T CITY
COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGIilt
FROM: GREATER CLE10101 ' CIIAMIII:It 01: COMMURCH BICENTENNIAL COMMITTEE
SUBJECT: MONUMENT TO CONTAIN A SUITABLE TIME CAPSlll,li
In addition to the many individual organic bicentennial
programs which will he projected bettreen now and July 4,
1976, this Chamber plans on filling a time capsule with
many articles, pictures and other memorabilia to be Bath -
Bred from the area's schools, churches, merchants, pro-
fessionals, clubs, associations and institutions of all
ages.
It is difficult at this time to determine the size of the
capsule or the size or the monument to house this capsule.
If all material collected becomes bulky, it can be micro -
Filmed and stored as such for the committee of the Tricen-
tennial Committee to open on July 4, 2076.
Since Clermont does not at this time have a memorial to
its people, I thought that perhaps the city would like
to find it suitable location for this capsule and monument,
plus the attachment of a suitably inscribed bronze plaque
denoting the patriotic contents and the requested histor-
ical opening for and by the proposed tricentennial
committee. The monument, plaque and monument location
could be the city's contribution to this area bicentennial
project.
It is planned that the Chamber will "Kink -Off" it's
Bicentennial program during the labor Day celebration at
the Jaycee Beach. We plan to have a flag raising ceremony
and at this time announce plans for collection of material
for the time capsule. We believe this will give all :in the
Greater Clermont area a piece of the Bicentennial action.
Trusting we may receive a favorable reply and if more details
are required I will be available for a council meeting.
Respec�l ,
�,. R.W. Waters, Chairman
Bicentennial Committee IIome of the
,i• - -
a CITRUS TOWER
,earrnuiil Ile..n 4'irhlnx
RWW/bd