Loading...
05-15-2012 Supporting DocumentsCODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING MAY 15, 2012 CITY HALL at 685 WEST MONTROSE STREET At 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING FOR APRIL 17, 2012 OPENING STATEMENT SWEARING IN WITNESSES AGENDA UNFINISHED BUSINESS CASE NO. 12-802 Lindenhurst Realty Group, Inc. O'Shea c/o 711 Inc. Attention Tax Dept. #32273 998 E. Hwy. 50 Clermont, FL 34711 VIOLATION: 0 Chapter 86, Section 285 (c) IN/ Hardship Due to Eminent Domain Actions Chapter 102, Section 102-3 (b)(3)(g) Enforcement; Removal of Unlawful Signs Chapter 102, Section 102-24 (a)(b)(5)(8) Nonconforming Signs Chapter 102, Section 102-15 (a)(1) Permitted Signs NEW BUSINESS CASE NO. 12-825 Irving J. Matthews O'Shea 375 E. Highway 50 1 Clermont, FL 34711 REPEAT VIOLATION: Chapter 102, Section 102-3 (b)(3)(g) Abandoned Sign, No Tenant Exists on Site Chapter 102, Section 102-24 (a)(b)(5)(8) Nonconforming Signs CASE NO. 12-831 LaClair Christian B. Crawford 1305 Ryan St. Clermont, FL 34711 VIOLATION: IPMC 2012, Sections 702.1, 302.1, 305.1 Exterior & Interior Property Maintenance CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING MAY 15, 2012 CITY HALL at 685 WEST MONTROSE STREET At 7:00 P.M. CASE NO. 12-833 Derek & Ann -Marie Kearns LaClair 1704 Turnstone Way JZ-k Clermont, FL 34711 VIOLATION: Chapter 118, Section 118-35 Maintenance and Pruning Chapter 118, Section 118-71 Minimum Tree Requirements ADJOURN ANY PERSON WISHING TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS. FOR THAT PURPOSE, SUCH PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS BASED. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), IF ANY PERSON WITH A DISBILITY AS DEFINED BY THE ADA NEEDS SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, THEN NOT LATER THAN TWO (2) BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PROCEEDING, HE OR SHE SHOULD CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 352-394-4083 EXT 302. 2 CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD APRIL 17, 2012 The regular meeting of the Code Enforcement Board was called to order on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 at 7:01 p.m. Members attending were Vice -Chairman Alfred Mannella, along with Board members Larry Seidler, Bill Rini, Ken Forte, Chandra Myers, and Thomas Gorgone. Also attending were Jim Hitt, Planning and Zoning Director, Suzanne O'Shea, Code Enforcement Officer, Allen LaClair, Water Conservation Coordinator/Code Enforcement Officer, Dan Mantzaris, City Attorney, Valerie Fuchs, Code Enforcement Board Attorney and Rae Chidlow, Administrative Assistant. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. The minutes from the Code Enforcement Board meeting of March 20, 2012 were approved as written. The minutes from the Code Enforcement Board Workshop of March 20, 2012 were approved as amended. Code Enforcement Vice -Chairman Alfred Mannella read the Opening Remarks. Code Enforcement Officers Suzanne O'Shea and Allen LaClair, along with any of the public who may testify, were sworn in. Vice -Chairman Alfred Mannella gave the floor to Code Enforcement Staff and City Attorney. City Attorney Dan Mantzaris stated that Case No. 12-826 has come into compliance and will not be heard. CASE NO. 12-819 GCCFC 2007/GG9 Oakley Seaver, LLC c/o LNR, LLC; Attn: Urosh Tomovich 1200 Oakley Seaver Dr., Suite 111 Clermont, F134711 LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 1200 Oakley Seaver Dr., Suite 111, Clermont, FL 34711 VIOLATION: Chapter 102 Sections 102-22; Vehicle Used as a Sign City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. The Respondent was present. Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea, who was sworn in, exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to recurring parking of the business' van as a 1 CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD APRIL 17, 2012 sign. The business is located at the north most end of the Oakley Seaver Plaza, but the vehicle is being parked towards the south side, approximately 380 feet away from the business, towards Hwy 50. Compliance of this violation will be when all vehicles displaying any type of signage for The Cycling Hub are not being displayed as a sign. If all parking near the store is unavailable, additional parking exists in suitable areas around the plaza for parking company vehicles. Bryan Davis, 1865 Mariposa Way, stated that they have been contacted by Suzanne for this issue before. He stated that vehicle has been in various positions within the plaza complex for the past seven years. He stated that it wasn't until the past twelve months that they have been notified and cited because of the position of the vehicle. He stated the vehicle has been in the position for no less than six months with no notice prior to this. He stated that in the lease agreement with the plaza they are required to park their company vehicles and employee's vehicles in the outer parking spaces, allowing customers to have the closer parking spaces. He stated that if he wanted to use the vehicle as a sign he would park it near Highway 50. He stated that it is 370 feet from his business. He stated that with the trees and other signage on the outer areas of the plaza the vehicle is obstructed from being seen. He stated that he does not feel he should be dictated where within the plaza he should park his company vehicle. Harold Warren, Property Manager for Oakley Seaver Plaza, stated that this violation was forwarded to him recently. He stated that he agrees with Mr. Davis that it is required the tenants and employees to park on the outer parking areas so that the customers can have the closer parking spaces. Board member Rini asked if there are a required number of parking spaces for each tenant. Mr. Warren stated that there is not any assigned parking for each tenant. Board member Rini asked how many handicap spaces there were. Mr. Warren stated that he was not sure how many handicap spaces there were. Board member Seidler asked how many tenants were in this building. Mr. Warren stated that there are multiple tenants within the plaza. Board member Forte stated that he agrees with Mr. Davis. He stated that if the ordinance does not state how many feet the vehicle has to be parked from business, then he cannot vote to issue a violation on this issue. City attorney Dan Mantzaris read the code and warned that this is not the only tenant and if voted against the code it can cause a wide spread issue. Vice -Chair Mannella stated that the tenants have signs on their businesses and the provisions pertaining to the signs on vehicles are very difficult to decide on. N CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD APRIL 17, 2012 Board member Forte stated that he accepts the business man's argument that he chooses not to park up front to take away from his customers. He stated that he feels the ordinance needs to be updated. Board member Gorgone stated that what is relevant is whether there is a violation of the City's code and whether the Staff has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the vehicle is parked driverless for an extended period of time and positioned so far away from the business as to appear as an advertisement. He stated that he feels the Staff has met the burden of proof. Tom Gorgone made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with no fine accessed • seconded by Larn Seidler. The vote was 4-2 in favor of finding the Respondent in violation with no fine, with Board members Forte and Rini opposing. CASE NO. 12-820 Shradhahand & Vedyawatie Samaru 4765 Barbados Loop Clermont, FL 34711 LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 4765 Barbados Loop, Clermont, FL 34711 VIOLATION: Chapter 118, Section 118-35; Severe Pruning of Required Trees City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. The Respondent was present. Code Enforcement Officer Allen LaClair, who was sworn in, exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to the severe pruning of required trees. Pruning is not in accordance with "Standard Practice for Trees, Shrubs and Other Woody Plant Maintenance ANSI 300" of the National Arborist Association. Compliance of this violation will be when a permit to remove all 3 damaged trees is granted, the trees removed, and new trees installed. Shradhahand Samaru, 4765 Barbados Loop, showed pictures of the trees with new growth. Board member Chandra Myers asked Mr. Samaru what date he took the pictures. Mr. Samaru stated that the pictures were taken on Sunday, April 15, 2012. Board member Gorgone asked who pruned the trees. Mr. Samaru stated that he pruned the trees himself. 3 CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD APRIL 17, 2012 Tom Gonzone made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a fine o $SO per day from June 19. 2012 until complied; seconded by Bill Rini. The vote was unanimous in favor of finding the Respondent in violation with the fine and date. CASE NO. 12-830 First Church of the Nazarene of Clermont, Inc. 101 N. Grand Highway Clermont, Fl 34711 LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 101 N. Grand Highway, Clermont, FL 34711 VIOLATION: Chapter 118, Sections 118-35; 118-36; Chapter 34, Section 34-61 (1) City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. The Respondent was present. Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea, who was sworn in, exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced chapter of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to the following violations: Failure to maintain the required landscaping around the property. There are dead/missing hedges, and trees that have not been replaced. The vacant lots adjacent to the church are excessively overgrown with grass and weeds in excess of 18 inches. Compliance of this violation will be when the following conditions are met in their entirety: All landscape vegetation is sufficiently replaced and maintained so that all plant life is healthy, neat, and orderly. All plantings must adhere to the location, size, and quality of plant required. Remove all dead plant material. Replace hedges around the perimeter of the property, as to the enclosed landscape plan. They must be planted two feet in height and 30 inches apart on center, and FL Grade 1 quality. There are missing canopy trees located on the outside perimeter and interior of the property. They must be planted at 12 feet in height with a 6 foot spread, and FL Grade 1 quality. Mow all grass/weeds in excess of 18 inches, and remove debris from the property. Board member Bill Rini asked how old the church was. Ms. O'Shea stated that the vacant lot dates back to 1978 and the sale of the church was 1984. Board member Ken Forte stated that he did not see any trees so he wondered why the trees had to be replaced. Ms. O'Shea stated that they were planted, they died and they have not been replaced. Doug Lane, 1614 Presidio Dr., stated that a lot has changed on that property since the Church has been there. He stated that when the Publix Plaza was put in the road and intersection was 4 CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD APRIL 17, 2012 redone. He stated that during that process they lost some trees and moving power pole. He stated that the lowest line is about 14' high so every now and then the power company has the trees pruned. He stated that their intention is to come into full compliance. He stated that he needs at least sixty days. Board member Tom Gorgone stated that he would allow 60 days for Mr. Lane to meet with Staff to come up with a landscape plan and to report to the Board what the plan is to meet compliance. Board member Rini asked about the trees in the right-of-way. Mr. Lane stated that the landscape plan was done in 1997 and the utilities were not located there at that time. He stated that the poles were moved when they realigned the road so the power lines were placed near the trees. Mr. Mantzaris stated that the Respondent has stated that they intend to comply and he would ask that the Respondent not be brought back before the Board at a later date. He stated that they can be given two or three months to allow the compliance. Board member Forte stated that they should vote on the matter, he does not want them to come back before the Board. He stated that he can understand that the Respondent is a Church and they will need to raise the money to allow them to purchase trees, so he would suggest giving them four months to comply. Ken Forte made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a fine of $100 per day from Au t 21. 2012 until complied: seconded by Tom Gorgone. Tom Gor o�quested to amend the motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a fine of $100 per day, from July 19, 2012 until complied: Alfred Mannella seconded. The vote was 5-1 in favor of the amendment with Board member Forte opposing The vote on the amended motion or a fine o $100 per day from July 19. 2012 until complied was unanimous. CASE NO. 09-504 Clermont Motor Lodge The First National Bank of Mount Dora (Trustee) 1320 US Highway 27 Clermont, FL 34711 LOCATION OF VIOLATION 1320 US Highway 27, Clermont, FL 34711 REQUEST: Request for Extension City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. 5 CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD APRIL 17, 2012 The Respondent was present. Dell Potter stated that they had a contract and the buyer did their due diligence and the buyer determined that they would have to construct a retention area. He stated that the buyer backed out of the contract. He stated that they now have a new contract for less money so that they buyer will have the money to construct the retention pond. He stated that they are now going back through the process for the approval of the contract. He stated that they are hoping to have the contract completed in ninety days. Mr. Mantzaris stated that Staff recognizes that it was going to take a long time to get to where they are at now due to the economical issues. He stated that the Respondent has done everything the City has asked them to. He stated that the issue will not get complied with having a lien on the property so the best way to resolve this is to allow more time. He stated that ninety days should allow them efficient time to reach an agreement and close on the property. Tom Goreone made a motion to extend the compliance date to July 17, 2012; seconded by Larry.Seidler. The vote was unanimous in favor for the extension. CASE NO. 12-816 Jean A. Edwards & Donald C. Edwards 624 Prince Edward Ave. Clermont, FL 34711 LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 624 Prince Edward Ave., Clermont, FL 34711 REPEAT VIOLATION: Chapter 14, Section 14-9; IMPC 2012 (302.4, 302.5, 303.1, 302.1, 108.1.3, 305.1, 308.1, 304.2, 304.7, 302.7) City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. The Respondent was not present. Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea, who was sworn in, exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced sections of the International Property Maintenance Code, City of Clermont Code of Ordinances, due to the following: There is high grass and weeds in excess of 18 inches around the property. here is excessive underbrush around trees. (Section 302.4 Weeds) (Section 302.5 Rodent Harborage). In the rear of the residence the pool is green and stagnant, and has become a breeding ground for mosquitoes and other insects. (Section 303.1 Swimming Pools). There is no water service to the residence. There is an extreme foul odor emitting from the residence. The interior of the residence is filled with garbage, debris, clutter, and miscellaneous items. The ceilings appear to have water damage and be leaking. (Section 302.1 Sanitation) (Section108.1.3 Structure Unfit for Human Occupancy) (Section 305.1 General). There is miscellaneous refuse such as pots, 6 CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD APRIL 17, 2012 buckets, cups, etc scattered around the front, side, and rear of the residence. (Section 307.1 Accumulation of garbage and rubbish). There are broken exterior windows. (Section 304.2 Protective treatment). There are large holes in the soffits, permitting animals and weather to enter. (Section 304.7 Roofs and drainage). The wood fence around the property is in disrepair, with boards missing and falling off. (Section 302.7 Accessory Structures). Action required to correct violations: Mow all grass and weeds on the property in excess of 18 inches, including to the street right -of- way. Clean all underbrush from trees, and around the general premises. Drain the pool of all water and secure a cover, or chemically treat the pool so that there is no longer green, stagnant water. Remove all items/garbage/rugs etc. from the interior of the residence that is the cause of the foul odor. Clean/disinfect the interior to permanently remove the odor. Determine the cause of the leaks and make all necessary repairs, obtaining required permits if necessary. Remove all general clutter, debris and garbage from around the residence. Repair broken window glass. Repair the soffits around the house. Repair the fence so that all boards are secure and fit properly in place. Tom Gorgone made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code and to and the property a concern for the general health, safety and wel are of the public with a fine of $500 per day from March 9, 2012 until complied; seconded by Bill Rini. The vote was unanimous in favor oLfanding the Respondent in violation with the fine and date. CASE NO. 12-817 Tiproel, LLC Vacant Bloxam Ave. lot at Pitt St. Clermont, Fl 34711 LOCATION OF VIOLATION: Vacant Bloxam Ave. lot at Pitt St., Clermont, FL 34711 REPEAT VIOLATION: Chapter 34, Section 34-61 (1)(2); Unlawful Maintenance of Nuisances City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. The Respondent was not present. Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea, who was sworn in, exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to the property being overgrown with grass and weeds, in addition to the refuse located on the property consisting of branches, garbage, and miscellaneous debris. Compliance of this violation will be when the premise meets the following conditions: All debris/garbage, dead branches etc. removed from the entire property, and the right-of-way. Mow/bush-hog 50 ft in from all sides of the property, and remove all cut vegetation from the property. 7 CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD APRIL 17, 2012 Tom Gorzone made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a fine of $100 per day for 17 days it was not in compliance for $1700; seconded by Bill Rini. The vote was unanimous in favor of ending the Respondent in violation with the fine. CASE NO. 12-818 Miguel Mosquera 2494 Holly Berry Circle Clermont, FL 34711 LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 2494 Holly Berry Circle, Clermont, FL 34711 VIOLATION: Chapter 62, Section 62-33 City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. The Respondent was not present Code Enforcement Officer Allen LaClair, who was sworn in, exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to the parking of a commercial truck at your residence. This is the 3ra occurrence of this violation since April 2011. Compliance of this violation will be when the truck is no longer parked in the subdivision. Chandra Myers made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with no fine accessed; seconded by Tom Gorzone. The vote was unanimous in favor of finding Respondent in violation with no fine. CASE NO. 12-828 Harvey A. Rosenberg 1727 Chickadee Way Clermont, FL 34711 LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 1727 Chickadee Way, Clermont, FL 34711 VIOLATION: Chapter 66, Section 66-221 & 66-220 City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case. The Respondent was not present Code Enforcement Officer Allen LaClair, who was sworn in, exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation 8 CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD APRIL 17, 2012 summary as follows: You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to the continued violation of the mandatory watering restrictions put in place by ordinance and the St. Johns Water Management District. In addition, a fine of $50 for a previous violation has not yet been remitted. Compliance of this violation will be when the fine is paid; automatic irrigation occurs only on permitted days and no future violations occur within 1 year. Ken Forte made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a fine of $50 to pay the fine within .five days or a lien be placed on the property; seconded by Larry Seidler. The vote was unanimous in favor oLfinding the Respondent in violation with no fine. Board member Tom Gorgone requested a Workshop prior to May 15, 2012 Code Enforcement Meeting. Vice -Chair Alfred Mannella agreed that it is a good idea to hold another Workshop. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:01 p.m. Attest: Rae Chidlow, Code Enforcement Clerk Alfred Mannella, Vice -Chairman 9 CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA CITY OF CLERMONT Petitioner, VS. LINDENHURST REALTY GROUP, INC. Respondent. Case No: CEB 12-802 998 E. Hwy 50 Clermont, Florida 34711 ORDER CONTINUNG MATTER TO MAY 15, 2012 THIS MATTER came before the Code Enforcement Board of the City of Clermont for hearing on February 21, 2012 and the Board having received a request from the City of Clermont to continue the matter, does hereby order that the hearing on the above -styled matter is continued and shall be heard on Tuesday, May 15, 2012, at 7:00 p.m. at 685 West Montrose Street, Clermont, FL in the Council Chambers at City Hall. Done and Ordered this day of February 2012. CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA 04AT�0� Chairman David Holt 41 I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day of February 2012, a true and correct copy of this Order has been furnished by certified and regular mail to the Respondent, Lindenhurst Realty Group, Inc. c/o 7-11 Inc., Attn.: Tax Dept #32273, 8506 Quito PI, Wellington, FL 33414. 9171 9690 0935 0015 9838 14 cp36042doc#1107 1 Code Enforcement Board of the City of Clermont NOTICE OF HEARING CITY OF CLERMONT, Case No. 12-802 Petitioner Violation No. 1892 VS. LINDENHURST REALTY GROUP INC C/O 711 INC ATTENTION TAX DEPT #32273 Respondent Pursuant to Section 2-206 of the Code of the City of Clermont, Florida, you are hereby called to take notice that a Public Hearing will be conducted in the above -styled cause, pending and undetermined by the Code Enforcement Board on: Tuesday February 21 st, 2012, at 7:00 PM at 685 West Montrose Street, Clermont, Florida. Council Chambers of City Hall The Board will receive testimony and evidence at said Public Hearing and shall make such findings of fact as are supported by the testimony and evidence pertaining to the matters alleged in the attached Violation Notice. If the violation is corrected and then recurs, or if the violation is not corrected by the time specified by the Code Enforcement Officer, this case may be presented to the Board even if the violation has been corrected prior to the hearing. PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY. I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Notice of Hearing has been furnished by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested to Respondent, Lindenhurst Realty Group Inc., C/O 711 Inc Attention Tax Dept #32273, 8506 Quito PI., Wellington, FL 33414 (Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested#9171 9690 0935 0015 980� 10) BY: Suzanne O'S a, Code Ehf cement Officer this 6th day of February 2012. IF A PERSON DESIRES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THESE PROCEEDINGS, SUCH PERSON WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT, FOR THIS PURPOSE, SUCH PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL 1S TO BE BASED. City of Clermont P.O. Box 120210, Clermont, FL 34712-0219 VIOLATION NOTICE December 15, 2011 Violation #1892 To: LINDENHURST REALTY GROUP INC C/O 711 INC ATTENTION TAX DEPT #32273 8506 QUITO PL WELLINGTON, FL 33414 Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested #: 7011 1150 0001 2386 7265 Property Address: 998 EAST HWY 50 CLERMONT, FL 34711 Parcel Number: 30-22-26-0001-0000-3300 Type of Violation: Submission of a Cure plan In Violation Of: Chapter 86-285 (c) Titled: HARDSHIP DUE TO EMINENT DOMAIN ACTIONS (see attached copy) Type of Violation: Abandoned Sign, No Tenant Exists On Site In Violation Of: Chapter 102, Section 102-3 (b)(3)(g) Chapter 102, Section 102-24 (a)(b)(5)(8) Titled: "ENFORCEMENT; REMOVAL OF UNLAWFUL SIGNS" "NONCONFORMING SIGNS" (see attached copy) Type of Violation: Nonconforming Sign, No Tenant Exists On Site In Violation Of: Chapter 102, Section 102-15 (a)(1)(a)(1) Titled: "PERMITTED SIGNS' (see attached copy) You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced chapter of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to the following violations: 1. A Cure plan has not been submitted to the Planning & Zoning Department as required by code. This is required within 90 days of the property transfer. 2. The non -conforming pole signs located in the east side of the property are not permitted to remain past 30 consecutive days of vacancy. (Vacancy noted on October 17, 2011.) 3. Advertisement of the property for sale/lease/rent cannot be placed on the non- conforming pole sign, or on the canopy of the fueling area. Compliance of This Violation will be when the following conditions are met in their entirety: 1. A Cure plan must be submitted by January 31, 2012. Please contact Planning & Zoning Director Jim Hitt at jhitt _clermontfl.org or 352-241-7305 for details regarding submission. 2. Remove the pole signs in their entirety by January 13, 2012. 3. Remove all signage from the canopy. You are permitted to have two 32 square foot signs offering the property for sale/rent/lease, setback 5 feet from the property line; one sign per street frontage. Compliance required by January 13, 2012. Please contact me at (352) 241-7309 or soshea(D-clermontfl.org when you comply. Failure to remedy the violation within the allotted time will result in a Notice to Appear for a hearing before the Code Enforcement Board. 10 Suzanne O'Shea --) Code Enforcement Officer Sec. 102-3. Enforcement; removal of unlawful signs. (a) Responsibility for enforcement. The administrative official or the established designee thereof shall be empowered to enforce this chapter. (b) Removal of prohibited signs. (1) Signs on public property. Prohibited signs on public property or rights -of -way shall be removed immediately, and may be removed by the city or its agent without notice. (2) Temporary signs. Temporary signs which are or have become in violation of this chapter shall be removed within 48 hours after receipt of written notification by the city. (3) Abandoned signs. Abandoned signs shall be removed by the owner, agent or person in charge of the premises within 30 days after receipt of written notification by the administrative official or the established designee thereof. If the sign is not removed in a timely manner, the code enforcement officer may refer the violation to the code enforcement board for formal action. (c) Removal or repair of unsafe signs. Should any sign become unsecured or in danger of falling, or be in a disrepaired or deteriorated state so as to otherwise constitute an unsafe condition, the owner, agent or person in legal possession of the premises shall, upon formal notification, immediately in the case of imminent danger, or within ten days in other instances, cause it to be removed or be placed in good repair in a manner consistent with applicable city codes. If such notification is not complied with, the city may remove the sign at the expense of the owner and may place a lien for the cost thereof upon the property on which the sign was located, together with any other cost incurred by the city by filing such lien. (d) Illegally erected signs. Where this chapter requires work to be done by a licensed contractor and such work is not performed by a licensed contractor, the owner or lessee of the property where such illegally erected sign is located shall either: (1) Have the sign immediately removed; or (2) Acquire the services of a duly licensed contractor to secure a permit for such sign and obtain the required city inspections. If neither of these actions is completed within ten days of written notification by the city, the violation may be referred to the code enforcement board for formal action. (e) Termination of unlawful illumination. Upon receipt of written notification by the city that a sign is unlawfully illuminated in violation of this chapter, the owner or his agent or the person in possession of the premises shall immediately terminate the prohibited illumination of such sign. If this action is not completed within ten days of the written notification, the violation may be referred to the code enforcement board for formal action. (f) Signs no longer in use. Signs which advertise or identify a business, firm or similar activity must be removed within 60 days of the date the business, firm or similar activity goes out of business or vacates the premises. The removal of the sign shall be the responsibility of the owner of the property upon which the sign is located. Thereafter, if this required action for removal is not completed within ten days of written notification by the city, the violation may be referred to the code enforcement board for formal action. (g) Violations and penalties. Violations of this chapter, including those sections authorizing city removal of signs or other penalties, may be referred to the code enforcement board as prescribed by chapter 2, article V of this Code. (Ord. No. 281-C, § 1(ch. 15, § 10), 11-8-94) Sec. 102-24. Nonconforming signs. (a) It is the intent of this chapter to allow nonconforming signs permitted before the adoption of the ordinance from which this land development code is derived to continue until they are no longer used, or become hazardous, but not to encourage their survival. Such signs are hereby declared to be incompatible with the overall intent of this chapter. Thereafter, all such nonconforming signs shall be deemed unlawful and prohibited and subject to the enforcement provisions of this chapter. (b) Subject to the limitations imposed by this chapter, a nonconforming sign use may be continued and shall be maintained in good condition as required by section 102-10. However, a nonconforming sign shall not: (1) Be structurally changed, but its pictorial content may be changed. (2) Be structurally altered to prolong the life of a sign except to meet safety requirements. (3) Altered in any manner that increases the degree of nonconformity. (4) Expanded. (5) Continued in use after cessation or change of the business, business ownership or activity to which the sign pertains. (6) Reestablished after damage or destruction if the estimated cost of reconstruction exceeds 50 percent of the replacement cost. (7) Continued in use when a conforming sign or sign structure is permitted and erected on the same premises or unit. (8) Continued in use when any land use to which the sign pertains has ceased for a period of 30 consecutive days. (c) The casual, temporary or illegal use of any sign shall not be sufficient to establish the existence of a nonconforming sign or to create any rights in the continuance of such sign. (Ord. No. 281-C, § 1(ch. 15, § 9), 11-8-94) City of Clermont P.O. Box 120210, Clermont, FL 34712-0219 REPEAT VIOLATION NOTICE April 23, 2012 To: IRVING J MATTHEWS 2823 S ATLANTIC AVE DAYTONA BEACH SHORES, FL 32118 Violation # 1979 Certified, Return Receipts Requested #: 9171 9690 0935 0016 4434 09 Property Address: 375 EAST HWY 50, CLERMONT, FL 34711 Parcel Number: 30 22 26 0400 0000 9500 Type of Violation: ABANDONED SIGN, NO TENANT EXISTS ON SITE In Violation Of: Chapter 102, Section 102-3 (b)(3)(g) Titled: "ENFORCEMENT; REMOVAL OF UNLAWFUL SIGNS" (SEE ATTACHED COPY) Type of Violation: NONCONFORMING SIGN, NO TENANT EXISTS ON SITE In Violation Of: Chapter 102, Section 102-24 (a)(b)(5)(8) Titled: "NONCONFORMING SIGNS" (SEE ATTACHED COPY) You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to the free-standing, non -conforming `Leeza Morgan' sign that remains on your property. The business has ceased to exist at this location for more than 30 days. Compliance of This Violation will be when you have permanently removed the unlawful and abandoned free-standing sign from the property. Please contact me at (352) 241-7309 or soshea(a)_clermontfl.org when you comply. Failure to remedy the violation within the allotted time will result in a Notice to Appear for a hearing before the Code Enforcement Board. By: SA7anne Sh a leFinforcement Officer Code Enforcement Board of the City of Clermont NOTICE OF HEARING CITY OF CLERMONT, Case No. 12-825 Petitioner Violation No. 1979 VS. IRVING J. MATTHEWS Respondent Pursuant to Section 2-206 of the Code of the City of Clermont, Florida, you are hereby called to take notice that a Public Hearing will be conducted in the above -styled cause, pending and undetermined by the Code Enforcement Board on: TUESDAY MAY 15th, 2012, at 7:00 PM at 685 West Montrose Street, Clermont, Florida. Council Chambers of City Hall The Board will receive testimony and evidence at said Public Hearing and shall make such findings of fact as are supported by the testimony and evidence pertaining to the matters alleged in the attached Affidavit of Violations. If the violation is corrected and then recurs, or if the violation is not corrected by the time specified by the Code Enforcement Officer in his/her Statement of Violation, this case may be presented to the Board even if the violation has been corrected prior to the hearing. PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY. I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Notice of Hearing has been furnished by Certified Mail/Personal Service to Respondent, Irving J Matthews, 2823 S Atlantic Ave., Daytona Beach Shores, FI 32118, and regular mail to Emily Lee, 705 Washington Ave., Eustis, FL 32726 (Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested#9171 9690 0935 0016 4434 09) BY: Suza e O hea, Co Enforcement Officer this 23rd d of April 2012. IF A PERSON DESIRES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THESE PROCEEDINGS, SUCH PERSON WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT, FOR THIS PURPOSE, SUCH PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA CITY OF CLERMONT Petitioner, VS. IRVING J. MATTHEWS, Respondent. Case No: CEB 10-651 375 E. Hwy 50 Clermont, Florida FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSION OF LAW and ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Code Enforcement Board of the City of Clermont for hearing on June 15, 2010 and the Board having heard sworn testimony and received evidence from Suzanne O'Shea, Code Enforcement Officer for the City and Emily Lee for Respondent, thereupon issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law, and Order: I. FINDINGS OF FACT 1) Notice as required by Section 162.12, F.S. was provided to Respondent and Respondent was present through his representative Emily Lee. 2) The Respondent is the owner of and in custody and control of the property described as Parcel No.: 30-22-26-0400-0000-9500 in Clermont, Florida. 3) As of March 2010, all business operations and approved uses ceased on the subject property. 4) There currently exists on the property an unlawful and non -conforming sign as described in the Violation Notice dated April 20, 2010 filed in this matter. II. CONCLUSION OF LAW The Code Enforcement Board finds the Respondent, IRVING MATTHEWS, is in violation of Clermont City Code Chapter 102, Section 102-3(b)(3)(g), Removal of prohibited signs and Section 102-24(a)(b)(5)(8), Nonconforming signs. III. ORDER Based on the above -stated findings and conclusion of law, it is hereby Ordered that: 1) Respondent shall correct the above -stated violation on or before August 17, 2010, by taking the remedial action as set forth in the Violation Notice dated April 20, 2010. If the Respondent fails to timely correct the violation a fine of ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY cp36042doc#831 1 Case No: CEB 10-651 DOLLARS ($150.00) will accrue for each day the violation continues past August 17, 2010. 2) Respondent bears the burden of, and shall contact the City of Clermont Code Enforcement Department to arrange for a re -inspection of the Property and to verify that the violation has been corrected, and the property has been brought into compliance with the City Code Sections as cited above. Respondent shall call (352) 241-7309 to request an inspection. 3) Any fine imposed shall accrue from the date it is imposed until the date that the violation is corrected as verified by the City of Clermont Code Enforcement Department. Ih Done and Ordered this ff day of June 2010. CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLO A Chai n James T. Pu is , An aggrieved party, including the City Council of the City of Clermont, may appeal a final administrative order of the Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court. Any such appeal shall be filed within thirty (30) days of the rendition of this Order as set forth in Section 162.11, Florida Statutes. I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day of June 2010, a true and correct copy of this Order has been furnished by certified and regular mail to the Respondent, Irving Matthews, 2823 S. Atlantic Avenue, Daytona Beach Shores, FL 32118. o� lQ 0910 0 oul a5cl 4 g 3`) D Code E orce . nt Officer Suzanne O' Sha� cn36042dnr#R31 Sec. 102-23. Changeable copy signs. Changeable copy signs shall be regulated under the following guidelines. This section shall not include electronic message boards and the like, which are prohibited under this chapter. Such signs shall be permitted in the following manner: (1) A changeable copy sign shall not comprise not than 25 percent of the permitted sign area, except as described in this section. (2) Motor vehicle service stations and convenience stores with gasoline pumps may utilize up to 50 percent of permitted sign area for changeable prices of gasoline only. (3) Movie theaters and other performance or entertainment facilities may utilize up to 80 percent of permitted sign area for display of names of films, plays or other performances currently showing. Such changeable copy areas shall be included as part of the permitted sign area. (4) Changeable copy signs shall be prohibited for office, industrial and residential uses except for changes in tenant listing. (5) Use of changeable copy signs as part of permitted wall sign area is prohibited, except as described in subsection (3). (Ord. No. 281-C, § 1(ch. 15, § 8(G)), 11-8-94; Ord. No. 320-C, § 2, 4-26-05) ec. 102- . Nonconforming signs. t is the intent of this chapter to allow nonconforming signs permitted before the adoption of the ordinance from which this land development code is derived to continue until they are no longer used, or become hazardous, but not to encourage their survival. Such signs are hereby declared to be incompatible with the overall intent of this chapter. Thereafter, all such nonconforming signs shall be deemed unlawful and prohibited and subject to the enforcement provisions of this chapter. (b) Subject to the limitations imposed by this chapter, a nonconforming sign use may be continued and shall be maintained in good condition as required by section 102-10. However, a nonconforming sign shall not: (1) Be structurally changed, but its pictorial content may be changed. (2) Be structurally altered to prolong the life of a sign except to meet safety requirements. (3) Altered in any manner that increases the degree of nonconformity. (4) Expanded. (5) Continued in use after cessation or change of the business, business ownership or activity to which the sign pertains. (6) Reestablished after damage or destruction if the estimated cost of reconstruction exceeds 50 percent of the replacement cost. (7) Continued in use when a conforming sign or sign structure is permitted and erected on the same premises or unit. (8) Continued in use when any land use to which the sign pertains has ceased for a period of 30 consecutive days. (c) The casual, temporary or illegal use of any sign shall not be sufficient to establish the existence of a nonconforming sign or to create any rights in the continuance of such sign. (Ord. No. 281-C, § 1(ch. 15, § 9), 11-8-94) Sec. 102-3. Enforcement; removal of unlawful signs. (a) Responsibility for enforcement. The administrative official or the established designee ereof shall be empowered to enforce this chapter. Removal of prohibited signs. Signs on public property. Prohibited signs on public property or rights -of -way shall be removed immediately, and may be removed by the city or its agent without notice. (2) Temporary signs. Temporary signs which are or have become in violation of this chapter 0ir 1 be removed within 48 hours after receipt of written notification by the city. Abandoned signs. Abandoned signs shall be removed by the owner, agent or person in ge of the premises within 30 days after receipt of written notification by the administrative official or the established designee thereof. If the sign is not removed in a timely manner, the code enforcement officer may refer the violation to the code enforcement board for formal action. (c) Removal or repair of unsafe signs. Should any sign become unsecured or in danger of falling, or be in a disrepaired or deteriorated state so as to otherwise constitute an unsafe condition, the owner, agent or person in legal possession of the premises shall, upon formal notification, immediately in the case of imminent danger, or within ten days in other instances, cause it to be removed or be placed in good repair in a manner consistent with applicable city codes. If such notification is not complied with, the city may remove the sign at the expense of the owner and may place a lien for the cost thereof upon the property on which the sign was located, together with any other cost incurred by the city by filing such lien. (d) Illegally erected signs. Where this chapter requires work to be done by a licensed contractor and such work is not performed by a licensed contractor, the owner or lessee of the property where such illegally erected sign is located shall either: (1) Have the sign immediately removed; or (2) Acquire the services of a duly licensed contractor to secure a permit for such sign and obtain the required city inspections. If neither of these actions is completed within ten days of written notification by the city, the violation may be referred to the code enforcement board for formal action. (e) Termination of unlawful illumination. Upon receipt of written notification by the city that a sign is unlawfully illuminated in violation of this chapter, the owner or his agent or the person in possession of the premises shall immediately terminate the prohibited illumination of such sign. If this action is not completed within ten days of the written notification, the violation may be referred to the code enforcement board, for formal action. (f) Signs no longer in use. Signs which advertise or identify a business, firm or similar activity must be removed within 60 days of the date the business, firm or similar activity goes out of business or vacates the premises. The removal of the sign shall be the responsibility of the owner of the property upon which the sign is located. Thereafter, if this required action for removal is not completed within ten days of written notification by the city, the violation may be referred to the code enforcement board for formal action. () Violations and penalties. Violations of this chapter, including those sections authorizing ci removal of signs or other penalties, may be referred to the code enforcement board as prescribed by chapter 2, article V of this Code. (Ord. No. 281-C, § l (ch. 15, § 10), 11-8-94) Code Enforcement Board of the City of Clermont NOTICE OF HEARING CITY OF CLERMONT, Case No. 12-831 Petitioner Violation No. 1943 VS. CHRISTIAN B. CRAWFORD Respondent Pursuant to Section 2-206 of the Code of the City of Clermont, Florida, you are hereby called to take notice that a Public Hearing will be conducted in the above -styled cause, pending and undetermined by the Code Enforcement Board on: Tuesday May 15, at 7:00 PM at 685 West Montrose Street, Clermont, Florida. Council Chambers of City Hall The Board will receive testimony and evidence at said Public Hearing and shall make such findings of fact as are supported by the testimony and evidence pertaining to the matters alleged in the attached Affidavit of Violations. If the violation is corrected and then recurs, or if the violation is not corrected by the time specified by the Code Enforcement Officer in his/her Statement of Violation, this case may be presented to the Board even if the violation has been corrected prior to the hearing. PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY. I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Notice of Hearing has been furnished by Certified Mail/Personal Service to Respondent, Christian B. Crawford, 1305 Ryan St., Clermont, FL 34711 (Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested# 9171 9690 0935 0021 2723 91) BY: Allen LaClair, Code Enforcement Officer this 23rd day of April, 2012. IF A PERSON DESIRES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THESE PROCEEDINGS, SUCH PERSON WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT, FOR THIS PURPOSE, SUCH PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 9171 9690 0935 0021 2723 91 City of Clermont P.O. Box 120210, Clermont, FL 34712-0219 VIOLATION NOTICE February 27, 2012 To: Christian B. Crawford 1305 Ryan St. Clermont, FL 34711-3049 Violation # 1943 Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested #: 9171 9690 0935 0015 9839 06 Property or Violation Address: 1305 Ryan St. Parcel Number(s): 25-22-25-050000004500 Type of Violation: EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR PROPERTY MAINTENANCE In Violation Of: IPMC, Sections 702.1, 302.1, 305.1 Titled: Means of Egress, Exterior Sanitation, Interior Structure You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to the unsanitary nature of the premises, both exterior and interior. Storage of items, both exterior and interior, interferes with safe passage throughout the house. Compliance of This Violation will be when all trash, rubbish and junk items are removed from the driveway, the interior of the house, the garage, rear porch and the backyard. Also an emergency path of egress must be maintained throughout the house. Please contact me at (352) 241-7304 or alaclair@clermontfl.org to schedule an inspection when you comply. You are directed to take action immediately. Failure to remedy the violation within 45 days will result in a Notice to Appear for a hearing before the Code Enforcement Board By: Allen LaClair Code Enforcement Officer 9171 9690 0935 0015 9839 06 Code Enforcement Board of the City of Clermont NOTICE OF HEARING CITY OF CLERMONT, Case No. 12-833 Petitioner Violation No. 1971 VS. DEREK & ANN-MARIE KEARNS Respondent Pursuant to Section 2-206 of the Code of the City of Clermont, Florida, you are hereby called to take notice that a Public Hearing will be conducted in the above -styled cause, pending and undetermined by the Code Enforcement Board on: Tuesday May 15, at 7:00 PM at 685 West Montrose Street, Clermont, Florida. Council Chambers of City Hall The Board will receive testimony and evidence at said Public Hearing and shall make such findings of fact as are supported by the testimony and evidence pertaining to the matters alleged in the attached Affidavit of Violations. If the violation is corrected and then recurs, or if the violation is not corrected by the time specified by the Code Enforcement Officer in his/her Statement of Violation, this case may be presented to the Board even if the violation has been corrected prior to the hearing. PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY. I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Notice of Hearing has been furnished by Certified Mail/Personal Service to Respondent, Derek & Ann -Marie Kearns, 1704 Turnstone Way, Clermont, FL 34711 (Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested# 9171 9690 0935 0021 27 ) BY: Allen aClair, Code Enforcement Officer this 23Id day of April, 2012. IF A PERSON DESIRES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THESE PROCEEDINGS, SUCH PERSON WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT, FOR THIS PURPOSE, SUCH PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 9171 9690 0935 0021 2724 14 City of Clermont P.O. Box 120210, Clermont, FL 34712-0219 VIOLATION NOTICE March 15, 2012 To: Derek & Ann -Marie Kearns 1704 Turnstone Way Clermont, FL 34711 Violation # 1971 Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested #: 9171 9690 0935 0021 2720 32 Property or Violation Address: 1704 Turnstone Way Parcel Number(s): 32-22-26-119900019900 Type of Violation: SEVERE PRUNING OF REQUIRED TREE(S) In Violation Of: Chapter 118, Section 118-35 Titled: Maintenance and Pruning Type of Violation: MISSING TREE(S) In Violation Of: Chapter 118, Section 118-71 Titled: Minimum tree requirements You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section of the City of Clermont Code of Ordinances due to the severe pruning of a required tree. Pruning is not in accordance with "Standard Practice for Trees, Shrubs and Other Woody Plant Maintenance ANSI 300" of the National Arborist Association. In addition, there are currently only 2 canopy trees on the property instead of the required 3. Compliance of This Violation will be when a permit to remove the damaged tree is granted, the tree removed, and 2 new trees installed. Trees must be from the preferred canopy tree list and must be 10-12 feet tall and the trunk must be 3 inches in diameter upon planting. Please contact me at (352) 241-7304 or alaclair@clermontfl.org when you comply. You are directed to take action immediately. Failure to remedy the violation within 30 days will result in a Notice to Appear for a hearing before the Code Enforcement Board By: Allen LaClair Code Enforcement Officer 9171 9690 0935 0021 2720 32 CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD WORKSHOP MAY 15, 2012 CITY HALL at 685 WEST MONTROSE STREET At 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER AGENDA 1. Discussions on motions: a. Who can make a motion b. Amending & withdrawing motions 2. Discussion of Comments: a. Discussing a case after the vote b. Speaking without recognition by the Chair c. Questions not addressed to the party (be it the City or respondent) at the podium at the time d. Questions or comments not germane to the "due process" of the case at hand. Or comments going on too long (3-4 minutes) 3. Agree on a process to handle non -case related general or policy related questions CEB members may have of the City. 4. Board Procedures 5. Questions & Answers ADJOURN ANY PERSON WISHING TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS. FOR THAT PURPOSE, SUCH PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS BASED. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), IF ANY PERSON WITH A DISBILITY AS DEFINED BY THE ADA NEEDS SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, THEN NOT LATER THAN TWO (2) BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PROCEEDING, HE OR SHE SHOULD CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 352-394-4083 EXT 302. OsA o �. CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD WORKSHOP MAY 15, 2012 CITY HALL at 685 WEST MONTROSE STREET At 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER AGENDA 1. Discussions on motions: a. Who can make a motion b. Amending & withdrawing motions 2. Discussion of Comments: a. Discussing a case after the vote b. Speaking without recognition by the Chair c. Questions not addressed to the party (be it the City or respondent) at the podium at the time d. Questions or comments not gennane to the "due process" of the case at hand. Or comments going on too long (3-4 minutes) 3. Agree on a process to handle non -case related general or policy related questions CEB members may have of the City. 4. Board Procedures 5. Questions & Answers ADJOURN ANY PERSON WISHING TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS. FOR THAT PURPOSE, SUCH PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS BASED. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), IF ANY PERSON WITH A DISBILITY AS DEFINED BY THE ADA NEEDS SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, THEN NOT LATER THAN TWO (2) BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PROCEEDING, HE OR SHE SHOULD CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 352-394-4083 EXT 302. CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD WORKSHOP MAY 15, 2012 CITY HALL at 685 WEST MONTROSE STREET At 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER AGENDA 1. Discussions on motions: a. Who can make a motion b. Amending & withdrawing motions 2. Discussion of Comments: a. Discussing a case after the vote b. Speaking without recognition by the Chair c. Questions not addressed to the party (be it the City or respondent) at the podium at the time d. Questions or comments not germane to the "due process" of the case at hand. Or comments going on too long (3-4 minutes) 3. Agree on a process to handle non -case related general or policy related questions CEB members may have of the City. 4. Board Procedures 5. Questions & Answers ADJOURN ANY PERSON WISHING TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS. FOR THAT PURPOSE, SUCH PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS BASED. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), IF ANY PERSON WITH A DISBILITY AS DEFINED BY THE ADA NEEDS SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, THEN NOT LATER THAN TWO (2) BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PROCEEDING, HE OR SHE SHOULD CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 352-394-4083 EXT 302.