02-15-2011 Regular Meeting (Supporting Documents)CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING
FEBRUARY 15, 2011
CITY HALL at 685 WEST MONTROSE STREET
At 7:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
APPROVAL OF OF THE MINUTES OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING
FOR JANUARY 18, 2011
OPENING STATEMENT AND SWEARING IN WITNESSES
AGENDA
............................................... ■ ............................. ■ 1
NEW BUSINESS
CASE NO. 11-703AMA Orlando Investments One LLC
Bella Lago Subdivision
Clermont, FL 34711
VIOLATION: IPMC Sections 302.4 Weeds and
fin% 301.3 Vacant Structures and Land
CASE NO. 11-706
Ramlahkhan Singh
699 N. Highway 27
C`..�` Clermont, FI 34711
VIOLATION: Chapter 34, Section 34-61 (1)(2),
Unlawful Maintenance of Nuisances -Weeds & Refuse
OTHER BUSINESS
CASE NO. 09-494 936 10th Street, LLC
1/ �►� 936 10th Street
G Clermont, FL 34711 � l y,
VIOLATION: Chapter 122, Section 122-262
Failure to obtain site plan approval prior to
converting building
REQUEST: Forgiveness of Fine
CASE NO. 09-503 \I ` Celebration of Praise
Church of God
l7 3700 S. Highway 27
Clermont, FL 34711
VIOLATION: Chapter 86, Section 141
Failure to Adhere to Obligations of CUP
REQUEST: Forgiveness of Fine
3b des
CASE NO. 09-596 sh Leslie Anne Jarrard
S� 1400 West Avenue
Clermont, FL 34711
VIOLATION: Chapter 122, Section 122-344
No Permit for Accessory Structure
REQUEST: Forgiveness of Fine
ADJOURN
ANY PERSON WISHING TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS. FOR THAT PURPOSE, SUCH
PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE,
WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS BASED.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), IF ANY PERSON WITH A
DISBILITY AS DEFINED BY THE ADA NEEDS SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS
PROCEEDING, THEN NOT LATER THAN TWO (2) BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PROCEEDING, HE
OR SHE SHOULD CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 352-394-4083 EXT 302.
2
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
JANUARY 18, 2011
The regular meeting of the Code Enforcement Board was called to order on Tuesday, January 18, 2011
at 7:00 p.m. Members attending were James Purvis, Chairman, Ken Forte, Dave Holt, Les Booker,
Alfred Mannella, and Ed Carver. Also attending were Jim Hitt, Planning Director, Suzanne O'Shea,
Code Enforcement Officer, Dan Mantzaris, City Attorney, Valerie Fuchs, Code Enforcement Board
Attorney and Rae Chidlow, Administrative Assistant.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
The minutes from the Code Enforcement Board meeting of November 16, 2010 were approved.
Code Enforcement Chairman Jim Purvis read the Opening Remarks.
Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea, along with any of the public who may testify, was sworn
in.
Chairman Jim Purvis gave the floor to Code Enforcement Staff and City Attorney.
City Attorney Dan Mantzaris stated that Case No. 11-700 has complied and will not be heard.
CASE NO.11-697
Hep 8 Cler, LC
4335 S. Highway 27
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 4335 S. Highway 27, Clermont, FL 34711
REPEAT VIOLATION: Chapter 34, Section 34-32; Business Noises Disturbing Residential
Neighborhood
City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case.
The Respondent was not present, however the restaurant owner of China Taste was present.
Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea read the violation summary as follows: You are hereby
notified that you are in repeat violation of the referenced section of the City of Clermont Code of
Ordinances as evidenced by Clermont Police Report 2010-29741 by Lt. M. McMaster on Monday,
December 20, 2010. The City is requesting a one-time fine in the amount of $500.00.
Mr. Mantzaris stated that the first time this case came before the Board was in November 2009. He
stated that they came before the Board in September 2010 for a repeat violation. He stated that this is
the third time this case has been before the Board and the second time as a repeat violation.
Lt. M. McMasters, Clermont Police Department, stated that the police did not receive the call for service
on the date of the violation. He stated that they had been called prior to that date in reference to the
N
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
JANUARY 18, 2011
pressure washing being done on the roof after hours, so they increased patrols of this area. He stated
that at 9:55 pm as he pulled into the south entrance of the plaza he could hear the pressure washer. He
stated that the pressure washer was being operated at China Taste. He told the pressure washer operator
that he had to shut down because it was past time for the noise ordinance, at which time the operator did
pack up the equipment.
Dharmendra Soni, 899 W. Highway 50, stated that the restaurant is open until 9:00 pm, so they can't
clean up until after the closing of the restaurant.
Mei Lian Chen, 4335 S. Highway 27, stated that she just purchased the China Taste in December. She
stated that this will be the last time, and requested that this one time, they not be fined for this incident.
Chairman Purvis asked what she would do to stop this from happening after hours.
Ms. Chen stated that she would have them clean in the mornings before opening for business.
Board member Mannella stated he feels the owner property should pay the fine due to the fact this is the
third time and he feels the property manager is not correctly informing the tenants of the noise
ordinance.
Board member Booker stated that they should not have to start counting each time there is a new owner
for China Taste because every time it has come before the Board, they say there is a new owner.
Board member Holt asked if the property manager explained the lease prior to the Respondent signing.
Chairman Purvis stated that he agrees with everything that was said, but he feels they should not take
Staffs recommendation toward the new business owner because he does not consider her a repeat
offender.
Mr. Mantzaris stated the code reads that the property owner is responsible for all tenants and all activity
and behaviors on their property, even if they are not the violators.
David Holt made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a fine o $250:
seconded by Ed Carver. The vote was 3-3 so the vote fails. Les Booker made a motion to find the
Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a fine of $500: seconded by Alfred Mannella. The
vote was 4-2 in favor o, finding the Respondent in violation and in favor of the amount of the fine with
Board members Holt and Carver opposing.
CASE NO.11-698
Tower Villages, Inc.
211 Citrus Tower Blvd.
Clermont, FL 34711
2
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
JANUARY 18, 2011
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 211 Citrus Tower Blvd., Clermont, FL 34711
VIOLATION: Chapter 118, Section 118-35 (a)(b)(c)(d); Severe Pruning & Destruction of Adult Tree
City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case.
Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of
the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation summary as follows: You are
hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced section of the City of Clermont Code of
Ordinances due to the severe trimming/excessive hatracking of eight live oak trees and one drake elm
tree on the property. Severely trimmed shall mean the cutting of the branches and/or trunk of a tree in a
manner which will substantially reduce the overall size of the tree area so as to destroy the existing
symmetrical appearance or natural shape of the tree in a manner which results in the removal of the main
lateral branches, leaving the trunk of the tree with a stub appearance. Hatracking means to flat -cut the
top or sides of a tree, severing the leader or leaders; to make internodal cuts; to prune a tree by stubbing
off mature wood larger than three inches in diameter; or reducing the total circumference of canopy
spread not in conformance with the current National Arborist Association standards. Compliance of
this violation will be when the following is completed in its entirety: One tree removal permit is
submitted at the Planning & Zoning Department, and the nine affected trees are removed, including a
substantial amount of root system. Nine preferred canopy trees are to be replaced in lieu of the nine that
were affected. The trees must individually meet at least the following criteria: 65 gallon containers, 12 to
14 feet in overall height immediately after planting, 6 to 8 foot spread, 3 to 3 %2 caliper, FL Grade 1 or
better. The trees must be replanted in the same area as the affected trees, and not elsewhere on the
property. All replanted trees must be chosen from the preferred tree list for canopy trees.
Board member Mannella asked if the City asked the property owner to prune the trees or did they decide
to prune them themselves.
Ms. O'Shea stated that it seems they chose to prune them on their own. She stated there would not have
been a violation if they weren't so severely trimmed.
Chairman Purvis asked if the tree trimmers were licensed and if they had a permit.
Ms. O'Shea stated that they did not need a permit to trim the trees and said they were not tree trimmers
who trimmed the trees.
Board member Holt asked if the power lines above the trees were the issue for severely trimming the
trees.
Herb Smith, president of Tower Villages, Inc., stated that he has been building in Clermont for more
than 25 years. He stated that he did not tell the tree trimmers to prune the trees so severely. He stated
that he told them to cut them down about 2 feet below the power lines. He stated that if he knew there
was a pruning code, he would have just had Progress Energy trim them rather than pay someone to trim
the trees.
3
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
JANUARY 18, 2011
Board member Booker asked when the trees can be replaced.
Mr. Smith stated that he does not have the money to just replace all the trees at this time. He stated that
he will do what he needs to do. He stated that if he can replant one or two trees at a time until he gets
them all replanted.
Ms. O'Shea stated that the city is willing to work with Mr. Smith, but there are several trees he can
choose from to replace these trees.
Les Booker made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a fine o $250
per day for every day in violation startingon 19, 2011: seconded by Alfred Mannella. The motion
was amended to allow a preferred tree, but not necessarily requiringacanopy tree. The vote was 5-1 in
favor of finding the Respondent in violation and in favor of the time period and the amount of the fine,
with Board member Ed Carver opposing
CASE NO.11-699
George Francoyannis
1768 Nature Cove
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 1768 Nature Cove, Clermont, FL 34711
VIOLATION: Chapter 336-C; Water Restrictions
City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case.
The Respondent was not present.
Al Freeman, City of Clermont Water Conservationist, stated that the Respondent was given a warning, a
first and second violation and a fine which he paid. He stated that he witnessed the third violation on
August 16, 2010 which was a Monday. He stated that the Respondent's watering days were on
Thursdays and Sundays. He stated that this property is vacant. He stated that certified mail was
returned but regular mail was not returned. He stated that in September he witnessed a fourth violation
so he had the Utility Billing Department shut off and lock the meter to this address due to the repeated
violations.
David Holt made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited Qx code with a lien of $250
be placed on the cited property: seconded by Alfred Mannella. The vote was unanimous in favor of
finding the Respondent in violation and placing a lien on the cited property.
CASE NO.11-702
Senturk Marketing, Inc.
899 W. Highway 50
4
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
JANUARY 18, 2011
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 899 W. Highway 50, Clermont, FL 34711
VIOLATION: Chapter 118, Section 118-35 (a)(b)(c)(d); Landscape Maintenance
City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case.
Code Enforcement Officer Suzanne O'Shea exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of
the condition of the property on the date taken and read the violation summary as follows: You are
hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced sections of the City of Clermont Code of
Ordinances, due to the following: Property landscaping, consisting of shrubs and trees, are in poor
condition and/or missing from the original landscape plan for the property. Compliance of this violation
will be when: Twelve preferred canopy trees are replanted in accordance with the original landscape
plan for the property. The trees must individually meet at least the following criteria upon planting: 65
gallon container, 12 to 14 feet in height, 6 to 8 foot spread, 3 inch caliper, FL Grade 1 or better, trees
must be from the list of approved canopy tree list. Shrubs around the property must be replanted as
follows: Remove all dead plantings and replace all areas of missing plantings as follows: Replant shrubs
at a minimum of 24 inches in height and 30 inches on center. If there are any existing gaps between
plants that are greater than 30 inches, another shrub must be planted to fill the gap. Shrubs must be
replaced from approved list.
Dharmendra Soni, 899 W. Highway 50, stated that there is no date on the landscape plan and he has
owned the property for 10 years. He stated that a couple years ago they removed the shrubs and
replaced them. He stated that he has spent a lot of money on landscaping, replacing the tanks and the
building. He stated there were no trees in the requested area before the tanks were replaced.
Les Booker made a motion to find the Respondent in violation of the cited City code with a fine of $250
per day for every day in violation startingon July 19, 2011: seconded by Ken Forte. The vote was
unanimous in favor of ,finding the Respondent in violation and in favor of the time period and the
amount of the fine.
CASE NO.10-655
Southlake Village Development, LLC
Vacant Lots on Legends Way
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: Vacant Lots on Legends Way, Clermont, FL 34711
REQUEST: Impose Fine and Create Lien on Property
City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case.
Attorney Jimmy Crawford stated that he was here representing the Respondent and to answer any
questions.
5
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
JANUARY 18, 2011
Les Booker made a motion to lower the fine from $3, 000 to $300 to be paid within 30 days or a lien be
placed on the property: seconded by Alfred Mannella. The vote was unanimous in,favor of lowering the
fine to $300.00.
CASE NO.09-603
Jean A. and Donald C. Edwards
624 Prince Edward Ave.
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 624 Prince Edward Ave., Clermont, FL 34711
REQUEST: Impose fine and Create Lien on Property
City Attorney Dan Mantzaris introduced the case.
David Holt made a motion to waive the fine of $3, 750.00: seconded by Alfred Mannella. The vote was
4-2 in favor of waivin the fine of $3, 750.00 with Board members Purvis and Booker opposing.
There will be no Code Enforcement meeting for March 2011.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:58 p.m.
Attest:
Rae Chidlow, Code Enforcement Clerk
James Purvis, Chairman
�l
Code Enforcement Board of the
City of Clermont
NOTICE OF HEARING
CITY OF CLERMONT, Case No. 11-703
Petitioner Violation No. 1657
VS.
AMA ORLANDO INVESTMENTS ONE LLC
Respondent
Pursuant to Section 2-206 of the Code of the City of Clermont, Florida, you are hereby called to take
notice that a Public Hearing will be conducted in the above -styled cause, pending and undetermined by
the Code Enforcement Board on:
TUESDAY FEBRUARY 15, 2011, at 7:00 PM
at
685 West Montrose Street, Clermont, Florida.
Council Chambers of City Hall
The Board will receive testimony and evidence at said Public Hearing and shall make such findings of
fact as are supported by the testimony and evidence pertaining to the matters alleged in the attached
Affidavit of Violations.
If the violation is corrected and then recurs, or if the violation is not corrected by the time specified by
the Code Enforcement Officer in his/her Statement of Violation, this case may be presented to the
Board even if the violation has been corrected prior to the hearing.
PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY.
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Notice of Hearing has been
furnished by Certified Mail/Personal Service to Respondent, AMA Orlando Investments One LLC, 8819 SW
74`" Ave., Gainesville, FI 32608 (Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested# 7006 0810 0001 2594 6865)
BY:
Suzan
this 27`h
January 2011.
Officer
IF A PERSON DESIRES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT
THESE PROCEEDINGS, SUCH PERSON WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT, FOR
THIS PURPOSE, SUCH PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE
PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE
APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
City of Clermont
P.O. Box 120210, Clermont, FL 34712-0219
VIOLATION NOTICE
January 10, 2011
To: AMA ORLANDO INVESTMENTS ONE LLC
8819 SW 74TH AVE
GAINESVILLE, FL 32608
Violation # 1657
Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested #: 7006 0810 0001 2594 9118
Property Address: VACANT LOTS LOCATED IN BELLA LAGO SUBDIVISION,
CLERMONT, FL 34711
Type of Violation: High grass/Weeds
In Violation Of: Chapter 14, Section 14-9
Titled: "International Property Maintenance Code 2006"
(SEE ATTACHED COPY)
You are hereby notified that you are in violation of the referenced sections of the
International Property Maintenance Code, City of Clermont Code of Ordinances, due to
the following:
• High grass and weeds in excess of 18 inches
(Section 302.4 Weeds) (Section 301.3 Vacant Structures & Land)
Action Required to Correct Violations:
• Mow grass and weeds on the property, including to the street right -of- way.
Remove all clippings and dead vegetative debris.
Please contact me at (352) 241-7309 or soshea@clermontfl.org, when you comply.
You are directed to take the above action for compliance by:
Monday January 24, 2011.
Failure to remedy the violation within the allotted time will result in a Notice to Appear for
a hearing before the Code Enforcement Board.
By:
CHAPTER 3
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
SECTION 301
GENERAL
301.1 Scope. The provisions of this chapter shall govern the
minimum conditions and the responsibilities of persons for
maintenance of structures, equipment and exterior property.
301.2 Responsibility. The owner of the premises shall main-
tain the structures and exterior property in compliance with
these requirements, except as otherwise provided for in this
code. A person shall not occupy as owner -occupant or permit
another person to occupy premises which are not in a sanitary
and safe condition and which do not comply with the require-
ments of this chapter. Occupants of a dwelling unit, rooming
unit or housekeeping unit are responsible for keeping in a
clean, sanitary and safe condition that part of the dwelling unit,
rooming unit, housekeeping unit or premises which they
occupy and control.
3013 Vacant structures and land. All vacant structures and
premises thereof or vacant land shall be maintained in a clean,
safe, secure and sanitary condition as provided herein so as not
to cause a blighting problem or adversely affect the public
health or safety.
SECTION 302
EXTERIOR PROPERTY AREAS
302.1 Sanitation. All exterior property and premises shall be
maintained in a clean, safe and sanitary condition. The occu-
pant shall keep that part of the exterior property which such
occupant occupies or controls in a clean and sanitary condition.
302.2 Grading and drainage. All premises shall be graded
and maintained to prevent the erosion of soil and to prevent the
accumulation of stagnant water thereon, or within any structure
located thereon.
Exception: Approved retention areas and reservoirs.
302.3 Sidewalks and driveways. All sidewalks, walkways,
stairs, driveways, parking spaces and similar areas shall be kept
in a proper state of repair, and maintained free from hazardous
conditions.
302.4 Weeds. All premises and exterior property shall be main-
tained free from weeds or plant growth in excess of Ourisdic-
tion to insert height in inches). All noxious weeds shall be
prohibited. Weeds shall be defined as all grasses, annual plants
and vegetation, other than trees or shrubs provided; however,
this term shall not include cultivated flowers and gardens.
Upon failure of the owner or agent having charge of a prop-
erty to cut and destroy weeds after service of a notice of viola-
tion, they shall be subject to prosecution in accordance with
Section 106.3 and as prescribed by the authority having juris-
diction. Upon failure to comply with the notice of violation,
any duly authorized employee of the jurisdiction or contractor
hired by the jurisdiction shall be authorized to enter upon the
property in violation and cut and destroy the weeds growing
thereon, and the costs of such removal shall be paid by the
owner or agent responsible for the property.
3025 Rodent harborage. All structures and exterior property
shall be kept free from rodent harborage and infestation. Where
rodents are found, they shall be promptly exterminated by
approved processes which will not be injurious to human
health. After extermination, proper precautions shall be taken
to eliminate rodent harborage and prevent reinfestation.
302.6 Exhaust vents. Pipes, ducts, conductors, fans or blowers
shall not discharge gases, steam, vapor, hot air, grease, smoke,
odors or other gaseous or particulate wastes directly upon abut-
ting or adjacent public or private property or that of another
tenant.
302.7 Accessory structures. All accessory structures, includ-
ing detached garages, fences and walls, shall be maintained
structurally sound and in good repair.
302.8 Motor vehicles. Except as provided for in other regula-
tions, no inoperative or unlicensed motor vehicle shall be
parked, kept or stored on any premises, and no vehicle shall at
any time be in a state of major disassembly, disrepair, or in the
process of being stripped or dismantled. Painting of vehicles is
prohibited unless conducted inside an approved spray booth.
Exception: A vehicle of any type is permitted to undergo
major overhaul, including body work, provided that such
work is performed inside a structure or similarly enclosed
area designed and approved for such purposes.
302.9 Defacement of property. No person shall willfully or
wantonly damage, mutilate or deface any exterior surface of
any structure or building on any private or public property by
placing thereon any marking, carving or graffiti.
It shall be the responsibility of the owner to restore said sur-
face to an approved state of maintenance and repair.
SECTION 303
SWIMMING POOLS, SPAS AND HOT TUBS
303.1 Swimming pools. Swimming pools shall be maintained
in a clean and sanitary condition, and in good repair.
303.2 Enclosures. Private swimming pools, hot tubs and spas,
containing water more than 24 inches (610 mm) in depth shall
be completely surrounded by a fence or barrier at least 48
inches (1219 mm) in height above the finished ground level
measured on the side of the barrier away from the pool. Gates
and doors in such barriers shall be self -closing and self -latch-
ing. Where the self -latching device is less than 54 inches (1372
mm) above the bottom of the gate, the release mechanism shall
be located on the pool side of the gate. Self -closing and self -
latching gates shall be maintained such that the gate will posi-
tively close and latch when released from an open position of 6
inches (152 rum) from the gatepost. No existing pool enclosure
2006 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE
Suzanne L. O'Shea
rom:
Todd Griffin [tgriffin@roofcontrol.com]
—ent:
Thursday, January 13, 2011 8:57 AM
To:
Suzanne L. O'Shea
Cc:
'Robin Griffin '; tgriffin@roofcontrol.com
Subject:
Request for appearance February 15th code enforcement meeting
Suzanne:
As per our conversation, we would like to formally request appearance before the board on February 15th to seek
mitigation of the levied fines with regard to the conversion of the referenced property.
Please let me know if you need anything else prior to the meeting.
Thanks
J Todd Griffin
Roof Control Services, Inc.
V 352.241.9677 A 321.251.6543
936 10th Street
Clermont, FL 34711
This email is confidential, may be legally privileged, and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. Access, disclosure, copying,
stribution, or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited and may be a criminal offence. If you have received this e-mail by mistake,
ease notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system. Roof Control Services, Inc. has taken reasonable
precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this e-mail however the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising
from the use of this e-mail or attachments.
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF THE
CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA
CITY OF CLERMONT
Petitioner,
VS.
936 LOTH STREET, LLC,
Respondent.
Case No: CEB 10-645
93610`h Street
Clermont, Florida 34711
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSION OF LAW and ORDER
THIS MATTER came before the Code Enforcement Board of the City of Clermont for
hearing on April 20, 2010 and the Board having heard sworn testimony and received evidence
from Suzanne O'Shea, Code Enforcement Officer and James Hitt, Planning Director, for the
City and representatives of Respondent, 936 10ffi Street, LLC, thereupon issues the following
Findings and Facts, Conclusion of Law, and Order:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
1) Notice as required by Section 162.12, F.S. was provided to Respondent and Respondent's
representative was present.
2) The Respondent is the owner of and in custody and control of the property described as
Parcel No.: 23 22 25 0500 1110 0400 in Clermont, Florida.
3) There currently exists a failure to complete site plan and convert property to commercial
use and obtained the required business tax receipt for the commercial use as described in
the Violation Notice dated February 3, 2010 filed in this matter.
II. CONCLUSION OF LAW
The Code Enforcement Board finds the Respondent, 936 LOTH STREET, LLC, is in
violation of Clermont City Code Chapter 122, Section 122-262.
III. ORDER
Based on the above -stated findings and conclusion of law, it is hereby Ordered that:
1) Respondent shall correct the above -stated violation on or before September 21, 2010, by
obtaining the required business tax receipt action as set forth in the Violation Notice dated
February 3, 2010. If the Respondent fails to timely correct the violation a fine of TWO
HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS ($250.00) will accrue for each day the violation
Case No: CEB 10-645
continues past September 21, 2010.
2) Respondent bears the burden of, and shall contact the City of Clermont Code
Enforcement Department to arrange for a re -inspection of the Property and to verify that
the violation has been corrected, and the property has been brought into compliance with
the City Code Sections as cited above. Respondent shall call (352) 241-7309 to request an
inspection.
3) Any fine imposed shall accrue from the date it is imposed until the date that the
violation is corrected as verified by the City of Clermont Code Enforcement Department.
Done and Ordered this day of April 2010.
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF THE
CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA
ames T. Purvis
An aggrieved party, including the City Council of the City of Clermont, may appeal a final
administrative order of the Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court. Any such appeal shall
be filed within thirty (30) days of the rendition of this Order as set forth in Section 162.11, Florida
Statutes.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day of April 2010, a true and correct copy of
this Order has been furnished by certified and regular mail to the Respondent, 936 10t" Street,
11748 Osprey Pointe Drive, Clermont, FL 34711.
-$ —lob to 0$10 60 01 9595 a-79S'
4T� 7 00(p O 8'[ v o Co I a 5i?Ll 5 q 53
Suzanne L. O'Shea
rom: Chris Dutruch [pastorchris@celebrationofpraise.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 4:34 PM
To: Suzanne L. O'Shea
Subject: Feb 15th meeting
Susan,
Please schedule Celebration of Praise Church for the February 15th 2011 meeting, to seek forgiveness of fines
regarding case # 09-503.
Chris Dutruch, Senior Pastor
Celebration of Praise
Clermont, Florida
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF THE
CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA
CITY OF CLERMONT
Petitioner,
Vs.
CELEBRATION OF PRAISE
CHURCH OF GOD,
Respondent.
Case No: CEB 09-503
3700 S. Highway 27
Clermont, Florida 34711
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSION OF LAW and ORDER
THIS MATTER came before the Code Enforcement Board of the City of Clermont for
hearing on June 16, 2009 and the Board having heard sworn testimony and received evidence
from Betty McMinamen, Code Enforcement Officer and James Hitt, Planning Director for the
City and having noted that Respondent were represented by Chris Dutruch and Shawn Cort,
thereupon issues the following Findings and Facts, Conclusion of Law, and Order:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
1) Notice as required by Section 162.12, F.S. has been provided to Respondent.
2) The Respondent is the owner of and in custody and control of the property described as
Parcel No.: 13-23-25-0405-033-00001; 05-23-26-0004-000-00300 and 08-23-26-0550-
OOE 00000 in Clermont, Florida.
3) The Respondent has failed to meet the requirements of the approved Conditional Use
Permit dated June 4, 2003 for the operation of the facility on the property, specifically
having failed to comply with Section 4, Paragraph 6 in violation of City of Clermont Code
Ch. 86, Section 141.
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Code Enforcement Board finds the Respondent, CELEBRATION OF PRAISE
CHURCH OF GOD, is in violation of Clermont City Code Ch. 86, Section 141.
III. ORDER
Respondent shall correct the above -stated violation on or before July 15, 2009 by taking
the remedial action as set forth in the Violation Notice dated April 21, 2009. If the Respondent
fails to timely correct the violation a fine of ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100) will accrue
for each day the violation continues past July 15, 2009.
co36042doc#510
CASE NO.: 09-503
Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Clermont Code Enforcement
Department to arrange for a re -inspection of the Property and to verify that the violation has been
corrected, and the property has been brought into compliance with the City Code Sections as
cited above. Respondent shall call (352) 394-4083 012 to request an inspection.
Any fine imposed shall accrue from the date it is imposed until the date that the violation is
corrected as verified by the City of Clermont Code Enforcement Department.
Done and Ordered this j day of Lt �tr . 2009.
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF THE
CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORID
Chairm ames T. Purvis
An aggrieved party, including the City Council of the City of Clermont, may appeal a final
administrative order of the Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court. Any such
appeal shall be filed within thirty (30) days of the rendition of this Order as set forth in
Section 162.11, Florida Statutes.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this ��day of June 2009, a true and correct copy of
this Order has been furnished by certified and regular mail to the Respondent, Celebration of
Praise Church of God, 3700 S. Highway 27, Clermont, FL 34711.
cam #- -700('0 oe\o CxXD% 3?S-95 -3818
�� e�— W C' k
Code Enforcemen Officer
—1AnA'7tA—A91 n
Suzanne L. O'Shea
rom: Leslie Jarrard[Ijarrard@militaryresortrentals.com]
,,ent: Friday, January 21, 2011 6:08 PM
To: Suzanne L. O'Shea
Subject: Code Enforcement Board Meeting
Suzanne, I would like to request to come before the Code Enforcement Board on February 15`h 2011 in order to ask for
forgiveness of my fines. We have won the variance approval and are now compliant with the City of Clermont's Building
Code. Thanks and please let me know if this is approved.
Leslie Jarrard
394-8058
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF THE
CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA
CITY OF CLERMONT
Petitioner,
VS.
LESLIE ANNE JARRARD,
Respondent.
Case No: CEB 09-596
1400 West Avenue
Clermont, Florida 34711
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSION OF LAW and ORDER
THIS MATTER came before the Code Enforcement Board of the City of Clermont for
hearing on November 17, 2009 and the Board having heard sworn testimony and received
evidence from Suzanne O'Shea, Code Enforcement Officer for the City and Respondent, Leslie
Anne Jarrard, thereupon issues the following Findings and Fact, Conclusion of Law, 1 d Order:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
1) Notice as required by Section 162.12, F.S. has been provided to Respondent and
Respondent was present.
2) The Respondent is the owner of and in custody and control of the property described as
Parcel No.: 26-22-25-0300-1030-0001 in Clermont, Florida.
3) An accessory structure exists on the property that was constructed without a required
permit.
II. CONCLUSION OF LAW
The Code Enforcement Board finds the Respondent, LESLIE ANNE JARRARD, is in
violation of Clermont City Code Chapter 122, Section 122-344, General development
conditions; (a) Building Permit Required.
III. ORDER
Respondent shall correct the above -stated violation on or before November 18, 2009 by
taking the remedial action as set forth in the Violation Notice dated October 2, 2009. If the
Respondent fails to timely correct the violation a fine of TEN DOLLARS ($10) will accrue for
each day the violation continues past November 18, 2009.
CASE NO.: 09-596
Respondent is further ordered to contact the City of Clermont Code Enforcement
Department to arrange for a re -inspection of the Property and to verify that the violation has been
corrected, and the property has been brought into compliance with the City Code Sections as
cited above. Respondent shall call (352) 241-7309 to request an inspection.
Any fine imposed shall accrue from the date it is imposed until the date that the violation is
corrected as verified by the City of Clermont Code Enforcement Department.
Done and Ordered this � day of November 2009.
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF THE
CITY OF CLE,RMONT, FLO-RIPrV
James T.
An aggrieved party, including the City Council of the City of Clermont, may appeal a final
administrative order of the Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court. Any such appeal shall
be filed within thirty (30) days of the rendition of this Order as set forth in Section 162.11, Florida
Statutes.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day of November 2009, a true and correct
copy of this Order has been furnished by certified and regular mail to the Respondent, Leslie
Anne Jarrard, 1400 West Avenue, Clermont, FL 34711.
` 7dd (0 0 R/( WO( oZ5q 5 d-x7
cp36042doc#651 n