Loading...
01-09-2001 Regular Meeting (2) CITY OF CLF. RMONT 'MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 9, 2001 Page I A regular meeting of thc City Council of thc ,City of Clermont was held Tuesday, January 9, 2001 at Jenkins Auditorium. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tern Biddle-with the following Council Members present: Council Member Mullins, Council Member MacLauchlin and Council Member Reniclc Other City officials present were City Man'~ger 8aunders, City Attorney Guthrie, Planning Director Brown and Deputy City Clerk Maddox. Mayor Turvill¢ was absent. INVOCATION The Invocation was offered by Council Member. Biddle followed by the repeating of the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag by all present.', ' MINUTES d motion was made by Council Member MacI~uchlin, seconded by Council Member Renick, and carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the regular Council Meeting held December 12, 2000. CITY MANAGER SAUNDERS' REPORT City Manager Saunders reminded the Council of the Council Retreat to be held January 18, 2001 at the Highlander Hut, starting at 9:00 a.m. City Manager Saunders scheduled a workshop with the Council Members for Thursday, January 25, 2001. CITY ATTORNEY GUTHRIE No report. COUNCIL MEMBER RENICK No report. CITY OF CLERMONT REGUL, ' co ciL JANUARY 9, 2001 Page 2 COUNCIL MEMBER MULLINS · No report. couNc-'IL MEMBER MacL.UCHLIN No report. -COUNCIL'MEMBER BIDDLE Council Member Biddle invited everyone to ~he Business After HOurs, between'.5.~O p. lm.: and 7:00 p.m. on Thtu-sday, January 1 I, 2001, and stated the event will feature.the Street project and all of the shops.downtown .will be open. Council Member Biddle stated that there had been discussion about c .han~. the C~uncil Meeting time l~om 7:30 P.m. to 7:00 p.m. and asked for commentS from the Council Members and City Manager Saunclers. .After discussion, there was consensus that beginning with the February 13, 2001 meeting, the Council Meetings will begin at 7:00 p.m. .d motion was made by Council Member Mullins, seconded by Council Member Mac~_~__:whlin, and carried unanimously to begin City Council Meetings at 7:00 p.m. beginning Februa~_ 13, 2001. Mayor Pro Tem Biddle read the Arbor Day Proclamation into the record, declaring January 20, 2001 as Arbor Day in the City of Clermont. CONSENT AGENDA Item No. 1-Parks and Recreation Purchase of Bleachers Item No. 2-Parks and Recreation Replacement of Playground Equipment for JANUARY 9~ 2001 Page 3 . Item No. 3-Clermont Downtown Partnership~Closing of Montrose Street for .::: !~t Fr!d.,'~y Events · d motion was made by Council Member Mullins, seconded by Council. Member Reniclg .and ca_~ed un. an'imously to approve Items 1 through 3 of the.i:onsent agenda.. -'o'~dinitnce No. 405-M-Final Reading .' May~r' Pro Tern Bid.die read Ordl.ance No. 405-M by title only. City Managor Saunders stated that this ordlnance'will provide -for a telecommunication franchise with Adelphia Business Solutions. Mr. Saunclers stated that the ordinance was tabled several times waiting for Adelphi'a to approve the revisions to the agreement suggested by City Attorney Guthrie, and the approval ..has been provided by correspondence dated December 19, 2000, a copy of which was provided to Council Members. Council Member Renick asked if this had been discussed at length before she became a Council Member and City Manager Sannders stated it had been reviewed several times and the City has entered into similar telecommunication agreements in the past. Council Member Renick asked if Adelphia was going to be marketing in our area or were they just using our area as a pass-through to get to another area. Council Member Renlck had questions regarding the fees and insurance risks, as well as whether Adelphia would be allowed to arbitrarily cut down trees in rights- of-way. City Manager Saunders stated that Adelphia is attempting to enter into competition with Sprint and other companies who are in this market. City Manager Saunders stated that the 1% fee is a Statutory fee and that is all we can charge. CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES REGULAR-COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 9, 2001 Page 4 City Attorney Guthrie explained that Adelphia can send their signals through the air.until they want to serve our area.with cable T.V. or the telecommunications that they offer. Mr. Guthrie' stated tha t because the Telecommunications Act of 1995 greatly constrains the abilitY'of the" State and .10eal G0~ernments to deny franchises because the legislature states the Ket was intended to encourage competition ' among cable providers, therefore the City is'not in a position to disallow a company to come in. Council Member Renick asked whether Adelphia, in order to put in their cable, can cut down trees on the City right~f:ways.'.'.andCity Attorney Guthrie explained that the company would have to Come't9 the City befOre they put in cable and explained that the company first will have to make use of existing poles and other facilities available and if they need to erect their own poles, they will have to come before the Council. City Manager Saunders stated that the majority of the company's cable is underground. City Attorney Guthrie stated that while the City cannot deny them access, the City can control the route the company takes to get their cable ~om one place to another. Mr. Guthrie stated that he and City Manager Saunders reviewed the agreement thorougMy and took out language that was over- reaching. City Manager Saunders stated that the League of Cities is in the process of drafting a model ordinance that will be brought before the Council in approximately a month t'o six weeks., Mr. Guthrie stated that the new ordinance will assert our fight to regulate the fight-of-ways and assert our right to a Statutory fee, which we are doing in this ordinance already. A motion was made by Council Member Mullins, seconded by Council Member MacLauchlin, and carried unanimously to adopt Ordinance No. 405-M providing ['or a telecommunication franchise with ddelphia Business Solutions. Ordinance No. 411-M-Final Reading Mayor Pro Tern Biddle read Ordinance No. 411-M by title only. ' ~ ~ CITY OF. CLERMONT' REGULAR coUNt. I~:TI~G ' page 5 ~g~g ~omc ~t~:f~way ~es alongci~ Tower.Bo~ev~ ~. Sa~d~. s~t~ S~ffwo~d f~l mo~ ~o~ble'~g ~ose issu~ ~olv~ befo~ ~e ~uncil Membe~ ienick and ca~M'.U~hi~lV tO ~able ' O~din a~e. ~o. d H-M un~l Ihe ~anua~ 2 ~,. ~ oo L me~ng ~S~O~ ~ BUS.SS Mayor Pro Tern Biddle stated that the following issue requires a Quasi-Judicial Hearing be held and that anyone wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to the request should be sworn in. 'Jim Cotfingham Planning/)[rector Brown stated that the applicant is requesting a variance to allow a 9 foot tall dumpst~r enclosure wfiere our. ordinance limits the height to 6 feet for the /~zbour's/Hungry Howi~s Kestaurant located on the Kash 'n Kany out parcel. Mr. Brown stated that this would allow Mr. Cottingham to keep the dumpster that is akeady constructed and our Code's 6 foot limit is not tall enough to hide the new dumpsters. Staff supports this request and will soon bring before the Council an amendment to our current code that will allow dumpster and compact enclosures to be greater than 6 feet high. CHT OF CLERMONT lVIINUTES REGULAR cOuNc~ MEETING JANUARY 9, 2001 Page 6 Mayor Pro Tern Biddle opened the public hearing and Deputy City Clerl~ Maddox swore in the 'following: . Jim Cottingham, 1594 lq. W. 278a Avenue, Alachua, Florida Mr. Cottingham offered photographs of the.dumpster enclosure for the Council Members review. Mr. Cottingham stated that he was before the Council because he realized that their dumpster enclosure was higher that City Code allows but the height was necessary in 'order ~0 hide their dumpster, There were'no other comments and Mayor Turvill.e closed the public hearing. Council Member Biddle stated that he felt everyone, wanted to sec the dumpster hidden' and did not anticipate any opposition to the request. Council Member Renick stated she looked forward to having Mr. Brown bring an amendment to our Code allowing a increase in the height requirement for dumpster enclosures. .4 motion was made by Council Member Renick, seconded bY Council Member Mac~_xtuchIin, and carried unanimously, to approve the variance allowing an increase in the height cfa dumpster enclosure from 6feet to 9 feet. / William and Lujza Helm Mayor Pro Tem Biddle stated that the following issue requires a Quasi-Judicial Hearing be held and that anyone wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to the request should be sworn in. Planning Director Brown stated that the applicant is requesting a variance to allow a front-yard setback of 24 feet for a new home to be constructed on East Avenue north of CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JANUARYg, 2001 Page ? ' Minnehaha Avenue. Mr. Brown stated that the applicants are requesting the variance due to.the irregular shape of. the lot and in order to save an existing oak tree. Mx. Brown ~ provi.d, ed fin overhead p.roj~etion, of/he lot. Mr. Brown stated that the previous owne6ad~ of the property had been granted a variance, but'that variance expired due to lack of construction. Mr. Br6wn state that this. re. quest is in keeping with the homes to the west and Staff recommends approval of the request. · Mayor Pro Tern Biddle opened the public hearing and recogniTexl the presence of the applieant'.s availability in the event there'were any questions and there were no questions 20 Mr. Biddle dosed the public hearing. " A motion was made by Council Member Mullins, sec. ond~l by Co.unail Member MacLauchlin, and carried unanimously to approve the variance . request allowing a front-yard setback of 24 feet on an irregular shaped lot ,,'x, and in order .to save an existing oak tree. Lennar Homes, Inc~ City Manager Saunders stated that Staff is recommending tabling the variances requested by Lennar Homes, Ino. as the City has not received information requested from Lennar regarding parking. ,4 motion was made by Council Member Renick, seconded by Council Member Mullins, and carried unanimously to table the variance request of Lennar Homes, Inc. until the January 23, 2001 Coun6il Meeting. ~ime certain.) Resolution No. 1170 Mayor Pro Tem Biddle read Resolution No. 1170 by title only. City Manager Saunders stated that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended denial of this reouest and the Resolution orovided to the Council is a boilemlate CITY'OF ~OIVI' co.cra 9, zoo Page'8 ..resolution, without any specific COnditions what are normally placed in a CUP. Mr. Saunders stated that if the C.o.uncil believes theY.may'want to approve the Conditional-~- Use Permit, Staff needs some time.t6 look at what conditions arc appropriate for the extended COmmercial use of this.facility and stated he would like to see this tabled until the ~anuary 23'd Council Meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Biddle stated that he-felt ttmt since the Mayor was absent, he would .feel more COmfortable waiting until the next meeting .also, s0-that Mayor Turville can be present to vote on the issue. Mr.'Biddle stated.that hefelttha..t this CUP COuld s.et policy andhe felt May. or T~e,.as leader of.the'C_~oUnCil,'.Sh°Uld be presen~ to hear the issues. Mr. Biddle expressed to the sppli'.cants that ~ith Mayor T~e'::a'bs~t, they would need 3 out of 4 of the Council Members present to approve.their:request, and it would be beneficial for everyone to wait for the neXt meeting andMayor Turville!s presence. ~4.motion was made by Council Member'Renick, seconded by Council Member M,_d!ins, and carried unanimously, to table t~esolution No. II 70 until the Januar~ 23, 2001 Council Meeting. (Time c~. rtain). City Manager Saunders requested that the applicant call Planning Director Brown or himself to review their request. Resolution No. 1171 Mayor Pro Tern' Biddle read'Resolution No. 117.1 by title only. Planning Director Brown stated that this-is ~ request to extend an existing Conditional · Use Permit to allow the.expansion o.£ an existing office.building located at 310 Almond Street, by 1,000 square feet. Mr. Brown stated that the property has the proper land use and proper zoning, is appropriate for the area and th~ applicant is providing additional parking per COde and is providing additional storm water ~.apacity. Mr. Brown provided an overhead projection of thc property. CIgT OF CLERMONT MINIrrES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING: JANUARY 9, 2001 Page 9 Mayor Pro Tern Biddle stated that the following issue requires a. Quasi-Judicial Hearing be.held and that anyone wishing to .speak in favor of or in opposition to the request should be sworn in. ~- Ther~ Were no comm~ats and Mr. Biddle closed the public heating. .4 motion was made by Council Member MacLauchlin, seconded by Council Member Renick,. and carried unanimously to approve Resolution No. 1171 allowing the expansion of an existing.office building.- · Resolution No. 1172 ~ . Mayor Pro Tern ~3iddle read Resolution No. 1172 by title only. Planning ]~irector Brown stated that'this request is to amond an existing"COn"di.'~ona~..'Uso Permit for The L~gends PUD. Mr. Brown state~ that the first request is to allOW"for two ~A inch asphalt lifts where Our code require.s a total of 2 inches of asphalt~ Mr. Brown stated the second request is to allow Miami type curb where our code requires a standard F-curb and the third request is to allow the refurbished historic water tower as an additional sign for the Legends Golf Course. Mr. Brown stated that Staff~ consistently denied the requests for. 1 ½ i~ches of asphalt and for Miami type curbs. Mr: Brown stated that Staff finds no hardship and therefore recommends denial of these requests. Mr. Brown stated that Staff does recommend approval of the water tower icon sign for the Legends Golf Coucse, and therefore recommends approval of Resolution No. 1172, which only includes the issue of the water tower sign and does not include the other two variances requested. Mayor Pro Tern Biddle stated that the following issue requires a Quasi-Judicial Hearing be held and that anyone wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to the request should be sworn in. Deputy City Clerk Maddox swore in the following: -., ' ~ CITY OF CLF. RMONT 'MINIr~S ,IANUARY 9, 2001 Page 10 Duane Booth, 350 N. Sinclair, Tavares, Florida Frank.Caputo, 3917 Scarboro Court, Clermont, Florida Mr. B0dth, of Farner Barley& AssOciates informed.the Council that he was the project engineer for the project and stated that he h~.d discussed these issues with Staff and did not agree that 1 ½ inches .of-asphalt in lieu of 2 inches.required by code would make the road better, but would result in higher costs'and that they feel 2 inches is overkill. Mr. Booth stated that 2 inches-is [axko.County's code fora collector road, and the roads in this project are private roads.' Mr. Booth stated..tl~at he roads in The Legends are privat, e .and it is his understanding thatLennar has in:their Deed R.estrictio.ns .that the owner~...wi)l never ask the City to take over the streets'and the.streets shall always remain private'and there are road reserves built in the monthly'fees of the association and at 18 years-there will be money to resurface. Mr. Booth stated, that.While'he.recommends the curb required by. our Code for steep slopes, he feels that the Miami curb'Will meet the'Code requirements on these roads, looks better and is more economical and that F-curbs should only be necessary where the grade exceeds 5%. Mr. Caputo stated that when his neighborhood association in Kings Ridge assumed the responsibilities for their roads from the developer, they discovered that the street reserves were way under funded and he is concerned that those people moving into the Legends may not realize what it may cost them in the furore to' maintain their roads. Mx. Caputo stated that he feels the developer of The Legends should meet the City's codes and urged · the Council to den~ the variances. Mayor Pro Tem Biddle closed the p.ublic hearing. Council Member Renick stated that if the developer tums over the roads to the homeowners associations, the burden to maintain the roads will be on the citizens of The Legends. Council Member Mullins. asked if it was a fact that the roads were privatized in the Deed l~,~erir.~qe~nc ~nd C. itv Manager .qaunders stated it was a moot r)oint since the homeowners CITY OF CL~O~ IVIINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL M[EETING JANUARY 9, 2001 Page 11 could.still come back years from now and request the Council's approval for the City to take over the roads and there is nothing that requires the Deed Restrictions to be upheld. City Manager'Saunders stated that the standard F-curb has been in our code since 197~3~ and there have beenmany requests over the years to allow Miami curb and the City has consistently stayed away from that and upheld our Code. Mr. Saunders stated the purpose tonight was not to consider mending our Code but to consider this variance request, and there is no hardship which is why Staff is standing by our Code. Council Member Mullins stated that this particular Resolution only addresses the water -'tower sign issue and approving.that will not i~revent applicants from coming back before the Council regarding' the curb and asphalt issues if they wish to do that in ..the'.fumre. Mr. Mulllrih stated he would like to have the City Engineer's opinion. City Manager Saundets stated that our City Engineers have upheld the City's Ordinance for the standard F-curb and even on fiat surfaces with the Miami curb cars drive over the curb onto the grass, and there is often erosion. After discussion there was consensus that the Council did not have a problem approving the sign for the historic water tower however supported our City Code and saw no hardship in granting a variance for'asphalt requirements orcurb requirements. .d motion was made by Council Member MacLauchlin, seconded by Council Member MuIlins, and carried unanimously to approve Resolution No. 1172, allowing The Legends to have their sign on the old historic water tower. ResolutiQn No. 1173 Mayor Pro Tem Biddle read Resolution No. 1173 by title only. Planning Director Brown stated that this is a request for a Condition. al Use Permit to allow the renovation and expansion of the Rollin§ Hills Ford Dealership. Mr. Brown stated that the City Council previously approved a CUP for this project and this Re.~olution will amend that CUP in order to clarify lanl~ua~:e re~arding driveway access, crrr.or 200i right-of-way dedicafion..and' the!.~ ';m.:i~i~'Of'~nn~2~tion With' the contral'sewcr system. Mr. Brown higMightexl the 3 iSsu6s"'~t ~i~iag'i~en. ded..Mr..Brown provided an .~ CoUncil Member Biddl¢ stated that'h~'understahds'that this Resolution will dedicate a right-of-.,w&y for Hook Street and if Hook S'.treet'changes alignment, the City will give the right-of-way back to Rolllng"l-li!!s FordJ Mr. Biddle stated it is'~ilso his understanding that.driveway access shal! be pr0x4did from-the cdirent Frontage'I(oad to the main entrance ofth. e dealership and.whenlthe sewer'!hxe comes.along Hook Street, Rolling Ma)or Vd Tern Biddte stated ..that the fo i0Win 'isSUe requires a Quasi-Judicial Heating be held and that anyone wishing to speak ia faVb£ Of.or in oppoSition. to the request should be sworn in. Deputy City Clerk Maddox sworein the following: Jay. Rosario, 1 i01 E. Highway 50, Clermont, Florida Mr. Rosario pointed out that there were no major changes in the layout of the renovation and expan.4on project and they have no problem with the conditions of the Resolution. There were no other comments and Mayor Pro Tem Biddle closed the public hearing. Council Member Mullins asked when the County was. expected to finish Hook Street and City Manager Saunders stated that the County broke the Hook Street project into two phases; Phase One is from Hancock Road to Citrus Tower Boulevard and the plan is to immediately move ahead with Phase Two as soon as Phase One is out to bid. Mr. Rosario stated that they planned to do their expansion on the back part of their property until the County has the Hook Slxeet plans in place. CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES' REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 9, 2001 Page 13 motion was made by Council Member Mullins, seconded by CounciI Member (~ MacLauchlin, and.ca_~ed unanimousl¥ to approve ResolutiOn No. I173. ,_ "~/ i w:' ,asm- ss Community Development Block Grant-Selection of Administrator City Manager Saundem' Stated that thc City advertised for Statements for Qualifica. ti9 .ns 'for an Aamlnis~Xator'for our Downtown commercial Revitalization Grant::' Mr4; .stated. we received one r~pon~e from Fred FOX Enterprises, Inc...Mr: FOX Enterprlses,'Inc. did the actual application for the Ci~ and was sueeessful-..'.m: ' ·; .'" obtaining this grant for the City and stated that they also have.been the administrator roi two H0usifig Block Grants in the past. Mr. saunders stat. ed the'City has been haPPy With the work the company has done for the City in the past. and recommends appr0val.:of. Fox 'Enterprises, Inc. as Administrator of the grant and stated that the'City Will have to!equest DCA's approval since' we only received one proposal. City Manager Saunders stated that the fees in. the proposal follow the guidelines that are provided by DCA and Staff will · review those figures and make sure they are exactly what the guidelines allow. A motion was made by Council Member Renick, seconded by Council Member MacLauchlin, and carried unanimously to .appoint Fred Fox Enterprises, Inc. as Administrator of the Community Redevelopment Block Grant. Mayor Pro Tern Mayor Pro Tem Biddle stated our Charter directs that the City Council elect a Mfiyor Pro Tern at the first meeting in January but stated it was his understanding that Staff is recommending that this be tabled until after the Council Retreat. City Manager Saunders affirmed that the City Charter states that the appointment of Mayor Pro Tern shall be at the first meeting in January and in order that.the appointments of Mayor Pro Tern and the Boards and Commissions can b'e discussed and reviewed at the ~ . CITY OF CLERMONT . MINU'I~S REGULAR.COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 9, 2001 Page 14 Council Retreat Workshop on January 18, .2001, Staff recommends tabling this until the January 23, 2001 Council Meeting. ~4 motion was made by Council Member Reniclg seconded by Council Membe~ Mac:Lauchlin, and carried unanimousl_¥ to table the appointment of Ma~or Pro Tern until the January 23, 2001 meeting. Citizens Comments Ms. Cdbson asked for confirmation of the time of the Council Meeting on January 23, 2001 and Mayor Pro Tern Biddle stated that.it will be at 7:30 p.m. and beginning in Feb .ruary the meetings will begin at 7:00 a.m. There being no further business or discussion, the meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m.. Mayor Pro Tem Attest: ~oseph"~. Van~fle/, City Clerk PETITION AS YOU MAY OR 1VLa~Y NOT BE AWARE A POTENTIAL TATTOO PARLOR MAY BE OPEN'hNG ADJACENT TO NEW JACOBS CHAPEL MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH. PLEASE TAKE A MOM-ENT TO SIGN THIS PETITION THAT WILL LET THE CITY OF CLERMONT KNOW THAT WE ARE NOT FOR THIS BUSINESS OPENING IN THIS LOCATION. PETITION AS YOU MAY OR MAY NOT BE AWARE A POTENTIAL TATTOO PARLOR MAY BE OPENhNG ADJACENT TO NEW JACOBS CHAPEL MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH. PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO SIGN TI:lIS PETITION THAT WILL LET TIlE CITY OF CLERMONT KNOW THAT WE ARE' NOT FOR Tills BUSINESS OPENING IN TBIS LOCATION. ~ X PETITION AS YOU MAY OR MAY NOT BE AW.U-RE .A POTENTIAL TATTOO PARLOR MAY BE OPENING ADJACENT TO NEW JACOBS CHAPEL MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH. PLEASE 'rAKE A MOMENT TO SIGN THIS PETITION THAT WlI,L LET THE CITY OF CLERMONT KNOW TItAT WE ARE NOT FOR Tills BUSINESS OPENING IN Tills LOCATION. PETITION AS YOU MAY OR ~MAY NOT BE AWARE A POTENTIAL TATTOO PARLOR MAY BE OPENING ADJACENT TO NEW JACOBS CHAPEL MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH. PLEASE TAKE A MOM]gNT TO SIGN Tlt-IS PETITION THAT WILL LET TI:IE CITY OF CLERMONT KNOW TI]AT WE ARE NOT FOR TI:IlS BUSINESS OPENING IN TI:lIS LOCATION. _ h PETITION AS YOU MAY OR MAY NOT BE AWARE A POTENTIAL TATTOO PARLOR MAY BE OPENING ADJACENT TO NEW JACOBS CHAPEL MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH. PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO SIGN THIS PETITION THAT WII,L LET Tl:lE CITY OF CLERMONT KNOW TI]AT WE ARE NOT FOR THIS BUSINESS OPENING IN Tl~lS LOCATION. PETITION AS YOU MAY OR MAY NOT BE AWARE A POTENTIAL TATTOO PARLOR MAY BE OPENING ADJACENT TO NEW JACOBS CHAPEL IvflSSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH. PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO SIGN TI:IlS PETITION THAT WILL LET TI-IE CITY OF CLERMONT KNOW THAT WE ARE NOT FOR THIS BUSINESS OPENING IN TI:IlS LOCATION. PETITION AS YOU MAY OR MAY 'NOT BE AW,~XE A POTENTIAL TATTOO PARLOR MAY BE OPEN~IG ADJACENT TO NEW JACOBS CHAPEL MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH. PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO SIGN TIlIS PETITION TttAT WILL LET TIlE CITY OF CLERMONT KNOW TItAT WE ARE NOT FOR TttlS BUSINESS OPENING IN TltlS LOCATION. We, the residents of Lakeview Drive Clermont, FL, agree together in our opposition to the planned commercial car wash next to 7-Eleven on Highway 50 and the planned flow of traffic through our residential area. We are opposed to the opening of our dead-end street and.to it becoming a traffic pathway_for commercial property doing business 24 hours a day. We are opposed to our homes being disturbed by the noise and congestion of vehicles utilizing this planned business. 'We are opposed because of.the threat it brings to the safety of our families and the value-of our residential property. March 26, 2001 Name: Address: Telephone: .... ....... _~_.~~ ..... z~_~~ .......... ~~_ ~.~ ~.~ ~~~. . 2 ~ ~ ~ .~~ ...... .~ .~ :.~.~..~ : ~ ~ .~'~ ~ ~/' , .:~~~_.~_..r~.¢_~_.~~.~ ..... 2 ~ ~..¢~ ~.~ ......... _ ..... .... .... ......... We, the residents of Lakeview Drive Clermont, FL, agree together in our opposition to the planned commercial car wash next to 7-Elevenion Highway 50 and the planned flow of traffic through our residential area. We are opposed to the opening; of our dead-end street and to it becoming a traffic pathway.for commercial property doing business 24 hours a day. We are opposed to our homes being disturbed by the noise and congestion of vehicles utilizing this planned business.-We are opposed because of the threat it brings to the safety of our families and the value of our residential property~ March 26, 2001 Name: Address: ...... Telephone: We, the residents of Lakeview Drive Clermont, FL, agree together in our opposition to the planned commercial car wash next to 7-Eleven on Highway 50 and the planned flow of traffic through our residential area. We are opposed to the opening, of our dead-end street and to it becoming a traffic pathwayfor · commercial property doing business 24 hours a day. We are opposed to our homes being disturbed by the noise and congestion of vehicles utilizing this planned business. We are opposed because of the threat it brings to the safety of our families and the value of our residential property. March 26, 2001 Name: Address: Telephone: __~. ~_._,A~__ ...... ~_~_~_..~£; ........ ~.!~_:.,~__~_~,~_~, ~~..~ ....... z~:~_~~__~ ....... ~2:~_:~~.:_~.