Loading...
07.12.2022 - City Council MinutesCity of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 12, 2022 CALL TO ORDER The City Council met in a regular meeting on Tuesday, July 12, 2022 in the Clermont City Council Chambers. Mayor Murry called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm with the following Council Members present: Council Members Pines, Entsuah, Bates, and Purvis. Other City officials present were City Manager Bulthuis, City Attorney Mantzaris, and City Clerk Howe. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The invocation was given by Choice Edwards of the Central Florida Freethought Community followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. PROCLAMATION City Clerk Howe read the Proclamation for Parks and Recreation Month aloud. Mayor Murry presented the proclamation to Parks and Recreation Director Forman and Program Manager Maritza Rivera. PRESENTATION Chris Carmody gave a review of the legislative session. Mr. Carmody spoke about redistricting, local projects, tax projects, local government issues and affordable housing. Council Member Entsuah and City Manager Bulthuis thanked Mr. Carmody for the work he is doing on behalf of the City with the Legislators. PUBLIC COMMENTS Matthew Modica, Clermont, FL- Thanked the Council for their support of the Historical Society. Expressed concern regarding decisions the previous Council has made. Sterling Fry, 1647 First Street - Gave appreciation to staff for addressing the issue he brought to Council at the previous meeting regarding political signs. Banks Helfrich, 9100 Sams Lake Road - Attended the Red, White and Boom celebration. REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT City Manager Bulthuis - • Thanked staff and the public for coming to the Red, White and Boom event. • Reported the budget workshop will be held July 20 at 9am. • Children from Give a Day Foundation are facing the Police Department in a basketball game next Friday, July 22, at the Parks and Recreation Center. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT City Attorney Mantzaris - No report. CITY COUNCIL REPORT Council Member Bates - No report. City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 12, 2022 Council Member Purvis — • Thanked staff who worked to make the July 4 event happen. Council Member Entsuah — No report. Council Member Pines — • Thanked city staff and all involved for the July 4'b celebration. Mayor Murry — • Proud of the work staff did for the 4' of July celebration. Thanked former Mayor Ash for bringing the celebration back to the City of Clermont several years ago. • Questioned the start time of Council meetings. There has been a request to move it back to 7pm with CRA starting at 6:30pm. Council discussed the starting time at preceding meetings and their thoughts on pushing the start time back. There was discussion on if they can have a consensus or if they need a motion and a vote to change the time. City Attorney Mantzaris explained to Council that meeting dates are published with a start time of 6:30 pm, an option would be to have staff provide information on the meeting times and put it on an agenda to discuss and take action on at that time. • Vendor Fees for Pig on the Pond Maritza Rivera, Program Coordinator, has been in contact with the organizer of the event and will find out the exact price they are charging to be a vendor at the event. • Thanked Chief Broadway for the basketball camp at Clermont Elementary. Council Member Entsuah wanted to thank staff for quick response times. He received a call from a citizen on Lakeshore Drive regarding cutting down trees and foliage that were overgrown. Mr. Entsuah notified city staff and it was taken care of that same day. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Murry advised the next item on the Agenda for consideration was the Consent Agenda and requested anyone wishing to have any item pulled for discussion to please come forward at this time. Item No. 1— Meeting Minutes Item No. 2 — Surplus Request Item No. 3 — Bid Award Consider approval of June 14, 2022 Council Meeting Minutes and the June 21, 2022 workshop Minutes. Consider surplus from Parks and Recreation, Information Technology, Fire and Police and dispose of in accordance with the Purchasing Policy. Consider award to AGH Management, LLC for removal and installation of Bermuda grass to sod Hancock Park Soccer Field 1 in the total budgeted amount of $97,200. City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 12, 2022 Item No. 4 — Bid Award and Budget Consider award to Step One Automotive FD CW Amendment LLC d/b/a Ford Crestview to provide two (2) half -ton trucks for Building Inspector vehicles in the total amount of $78,688 and a budget amendment in the amount of $78,688 from Item No. 5 — Toho Water Authority Contract Item No. 6 — Resolution No. 2022-02OR Item No. 7 — Event, Open Container, and Road Closure Item No. 8 — Event, Open Container, and Road Closure Request Item No. 9 — Task Approval and Budget Amendment reserves. Consider piggyback contract with A.C. Schultes of Florida, Inc. for well services and repairs. Consider approval of Fiscal Year 2022 General Fund Budget Amendment. Consider allowing Suncreek Brewery to host "Suntoberfest" event in Downtown Clermont with street closures and open container allowance to take place on October 1 and 2, 2022. Consider allowing Suncreek Brewery to host "Irish Fest" event in Downtown Clermont with street closures and open container allowance on March 18 and 19, 2023. Consider approval of task order with Halff Engineering to evaluate the Victory Pointe drainage basin and consolidate the sub -basins into one on the amount of $73,720 with a corresponding budget amendment. Council Member Bates moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented for July 12, 2022, Seconded by Council Member Entsuah. Passed unanimously 5-0 with all members present voicing aye. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Item No. 10 — This item was withdrawn. Item No. 11— Resolution No. 2022-01011, Clermont Yacht Club CUP A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW AN INCREASE TO THE NUMBER OF MULTI -FAMILY UNITS PERMITTED FOR THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT, SEVERABILITY, ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENERS ERROR, PUBLICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. City Clerk Howe read the resolution into the record by legal title only. 3 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 12, 2022 Development Services Director Henschel presented the item. This Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is known as the Clermont Yacht Club. The applicant is requesting a CUP to allow for the construction of the 108 condominium units as a third phase approved as part of a 1998 Master Development Plan (Resolution No. 98-1029), which permitted 205 multi -family units and 266 townhome or condo units. On November 24, 1998, the Clermont City Council approved a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development. As part of the first and second phase, the developer constructed approximately 158 of the townhome/condominium units. The developer never moved forward with the third phase and the construction of the remaining 108 units. The applicant proposes that the condo units shall be designed and constructed in a manner that reflects similar styles, materials, colors and design features that unify and provide for an aesthetically compatible transition with the existing onsite townhome development. The applicant has submitted an updated Traffic Impact Study for review by the City's Traffic Engineer Consultant, and the results of the analysis indicates, that all intersections are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service and the proposed project is not anticipated to have any adverse impact on the surrounding roadway networks and intersections. The applicant will be required to coordinate and comply with the requirements of Lake County Public Schools for School Concurrency. Staff has reviewed the application and proposed project in regards to compliance with the Clermont Codes of Ordinances and due to the prior 1998 approvals and entitlements initially found that the proposed use was compatible with the area and consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies. However, after discussion at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and further review, it was discovered that in the 1998 Conditional Use Permit had the following language "This permit shall become null and void if substantial work has not begun within one (1) year of the date of issuance of this Conditional Use Permit. Substantial construction work means the commencement and continuous prosecution of construction of required improvements ultimately finalized at completion." Additionally, it was discovered that in 2008 the developer had approached the city advising that they would not be completing the third phase and requested to receive a refund of all impact fees paid for the third phase, which was returned to the developer. As a result, the original entitlements for the project are no longer valid, staff is required to review the current application as a separate stand-alone application. Upon further review, it is staffs view that the number of units and density of the proposed project will be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing in the vicinity. Staff does recommend denial of Resolution 2022- 01 OR to allow up to 108 condominium units. Cecelia Bonifay, Esq., with the Akerman Law Firm presented on behalf of the applicant. Ms. Bonifay provided Council with a packet which included a legal memorandum that was prepared and sent to the City Attorney stating that this is a clear case of vested rights. Originally the staff was in favor of this project, then they reversed course stating everything had expired. Ms. Bonifay went on to state that there was no indication that the project was cancelled due to impact fees being refunded. This area is already developed and there is a recorded plat. Stormwater, water and sewer were put in place for eventual development. The applicant is proposing 108 units which is well within the original plan for this area. Therefore, based on review of case law there is one legal choice in their opinion and stated this is a vested development. Rick McCoy, has been the Project Engineer on this development for a majority of his career. Stated that this project has always been planned for 108 units. The lift station, water supply, turn lanes, and roads were all built with the intention of building out the third phase of the development. Mayor Murry opened the public hearing. 4 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 12, 2022 Paul Svejda, 535 Julie Lane, Winter Springs - spoke on behalf of Masthead, LLC. who owns the property. Stated they have vested rights under the law. City Attorney Mantzaris interjected that there is a court reporter present and respectfully asked the audience to be quiet. The following citizens spoke in opposition of the project. They expressed concerns over issues such as density, traffic, and amenities. The majority stated they are not against the property being developed but believe that 108 units is too much for that property and would like to see less units. Rhonda Wolf — 321 Nautica Mile Drive. Ralph Hopkins, 200 Nautica Mile Drive. Stacy Bethel, 191 Nautica Mile Drive. Susan Grant, 305 Nautica Mile Drive. Mark Thomas, 309 Nautical Mile Drive. Diane Travis, 176 Nautica Mile Drive. Beth Calvacca, 102 Carrick Bend Way. Joy Ray, 156 Nautica Mile Drive. Julianne Sautner ,279 Nautica Mile Drive. Regina Wightman, 204 Nautica Mile Drive. Chelsey Wightman, 216 Nautical Mile Drive. Marianne Holt, 137 Nautica Mile Drive. Alegni Herrera, 163 Riggings Way. Mary Cramer, 208 Nautica Mile Drive. Stephen Piubeni, 249 Nautica Mile Drive. Ron Milejezak, 205 Harbour Cove Way. Stan Melnick, 109 Nautica Mile Drive. Donnie Tindall, 108 Nautica Mile Drive. Mark Helton, 280 Nautica Mile Drive. Charlene Forth, 939 W. Desoto Street. Michael Cramer, 208 Nautica Mile Drive. Mayor Murry closed the public hearing. City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 12, 2022 City Manager Bulthuis inquired if the development would become part of the HOA, if built. Ms. Bonifay stated that they are currently part of the HOA and are subject to HOA covenants. Ms. Bonifay explained that their stance is from their interpretation of the review of the documents that led up to the approvals for the infrastructure that is already in place. The entire area was platted and was to be done in three phases. Ms. Bonifay went on to say that her client has expressed no interest in changing the number of units requested. Mr. Svejda, Masthead LLC, explained that the company does pay HOA dues. Lake County originally approved the project before moving it to the City of Clermont and it is a vested project. Discussion ensued regarding when phase one and two were completed, the refund of the impact fees and what impact if any the 2008 stock market crash played a part in this project not moving forward originally. Council discussed whether the old documentation is still relevant today. Mr. Mantzaris expressed to Council that whether the old documentation is still relevant today is the question. The applicant does not believe they need an amendment to the existing CUP because they have the vested rights due to this being approved several years ago and they completed the required construction set forward in the CUP. The language the applicant is referring to comes from the city code, not specifically this CUP. Mr. Mantzaris went on to explain the language in the city code regarding CUP'S. The City does not agree that this project has vested rights. Council Member Bates stated he does not feel there are any rights owed. The surrounding residents want it developed but not to this scale. Council Members agreed with Council Member Bates in stating that they are not in support of this project. Council Member Pines moved to deny Resolution 2022-010R, Seconded by Council Member Purvis. Passed unanimously 5-0 with all members present voicine ave. Mayor Murry called for a five minute recess at 9: 02pm; the meeting resumed at 9: 07pm. Item No. 12 — Ordinance No. 2022-014, Final Cityside Townhomes AN ORDINANCE UNDER THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT REFERRED TO IN CHAPTER 122 OF ORDINANCE NO. 289-C, CODE OF ORDINANCES; REZONING THE REAL PROPERTIES DESCRIBED HEREIN AS SHOWN BELOW; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT, SEVERABILITY, ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENERS ERROR, RECORDING, AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND PUBLICATION. City Clerk Howe read the ordinance into the record by legal title only. Development Services Director Henschel stated that this item was originally presented at the June 14 Council meeting and Cecelia Bonifay, Esq., with the Akerman Law Firm requested a continuance to this meeting in order to provide additional information. The applicant is requesting a rezoning to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to construct sixty-eight (68) single-family attached townhomes on an 8 acre parcel. 6 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 12, 2022 The property is located northwest of US 27 and SR 50 intersection, directly north of the Crown Lounge and south of Highland Avenue. A portion of the site was previously used as a motel — Clermont Motor Lodge that was demolished in 2013. On the northeast corner of the site, an EMS station was operational until the closing of the Highland Avenue and SR 27 intersection. The property has been vacant since that time. The property is currently zoned C-2 General Commercial with a commercial future land use designation. The commercial future land use designation allows residential uses up to a density of 12 dwelling units per acre. The current zoning of C-2 General Commercial allows for the consideration of residential uses through a Conditional Use Permit, under section 122-223 of the Land Development Code. The applicant has decided to pursue the rezoning to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) due to the flexibility in design and waivers requested. The PUD zoning also provides a more site specific approach to the development of the property since a site plan is linked to the approval of specific conditions. The applicant has provided a conceptual site plan, prepared by Stringfellow Design. The applicant is proposing single-family townhomes along with amenities consisting of a community pool, activity lawn, promenade, and dog walking trail. The density of the project is at 8.45 dwelling units per acre, which is under the 12 dwelling units per acre that can be considered under the Commercial future land use. The applicant is proposing the townhomes to be 24 feet wide by 50 feet deep, two -stories in height with a two -car garage. Each townhome lot will be a minimum of 24 feet by 100 feet or 2,400 square feet. This is a waiver to the code that requires a minimum of 3,500 square feet. As part of the design and to offer a rear loaded garage product, the applicant is requesting one-way streets in a portion of the project with a reduced right-of-way width of 45 feet. This is a waiver request and staff has reviewed this request and does not oppose this request with the condition that the internal roads and alleyway will be privately maintained with an easement dedicated to the City. In addition, the applicant will be providing dedicated parallel parking spaces along these one-way streets. The applicant presented staff with an updated plan that shows they adjusted some garages and widened them to 23 feet. In doing so, those sites have larger garages but have lost 5 feet of driveway which brings the rear setback to 20 feet.. City Manager Bulthuis inquired about the stipulations listed in the Ordinance. It is for 68 townhomes with the front and rear setbacks being 25 feet. Mr. Henschel stated that the plans with the larger garages would add a waiver to the request that Council presently has. Staff has reviewed the application and proposed project in regards to Section 122-315 Review Criteria for a Planned Unit Development. The location of the project is within 1/8 of a mile of two arterial roadways, US 27 and SR 50 and within % mile of many services, which include grocery, restaurant, banking, etc., thus offering a greater walkability option for residents. The project has multiple access points that can distribute the traffic onto the existing transportation network and the traffic study review by the City's consultant indicated that the project would have minimal impact on the intersections and roadways within the study area. The site has City utilities available and the City can serve the proposed development. Staff recommends approval of Ordinance No. 2022-014, that would include the original 25 foot setback not the plan with the proposed 20 foot setback. 7 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 12, 2022 Cecelia Bonifay, Esq., with the Akerman Law Firm spoke on behalf of the Cityside Townhomes project. The following were also present: the developers, Pillar Construction along with the traffic engineer, Mohammad Abdulah and the planning consultant, Alex Stringfellow. The applicants have worked diligently to address some of the comments from the last meeting. Ms. Bonifay gave an overview of the changes that were made to the plans. Alex Stringfellow addressed two concerns that Council had spoken about at the previous meeting which were garages/parking and the site being used for commercial purposes. The interior size of the garages have been increased from 18ft. to 19ft. on the front loaded and 23ft. on the rear loaded townhomes. Mr. Stringfellow showed comparable properties with garages that are smaller than what they are proposing. Discussion ensued regarding the rear property line running to the middle of the alley since it is an easement and not a right of way. They spoke about garbage trucks being able to get down the alley and residents parking in the alleyway since it would be part of their property. Mr. Bulthuis explained that staff did not notice that the rear setback of 25ft. included half of the alley, staff presumed the 25ft was at the end of the driveway. Mr. Stringfellow covered a conceptual plan for commercial use. He spoke about the different type of commercial uses that could go there and the impact it would have on the existing roadways and what the traffic demands would look like. Mohammad Abdulah prepared the traffic analysis for the proposed development. They found the analysis to be sufficient and not generate a significant impact on the transportation network. With the improvements to US 27, this property was cut off which would have fed a commercial use. In approving this project it would generate less than 500 vehicles per day versus the 1,500 to 5,000 vehicles per day that could be generated with a commercial use. Ms. Bonifay addressed that the new site plans were given to staff late afternoon on the day of the meeting. Mayor Murry opened the public hearing. Vincent Niemic, - expressed concerns regarding the applicant requesting a waiver to go from 3,500sq.ft. to 2,400sq.ft. and the size of the garages. Mr. Niemic also addressed building a residential area in a commercial zoning. Mayor Murry closed the public hearing. Ms. Bonifay stated there will be additional buffering done from the surrounding commercial properties. Discussion was had again regarding the rear setbacks and if the alley was usable land to count towards the property line or would the rear setbacks have to move to 20ft. There was talk about residential use versus commercial use and access to Hwy 50 and US 27. Ms. Bonifay stated that the applicant has made a lot of changes since the first meeting with staff. A continuance was requested to give the applicant time to adjust the site plan and see if larger units make economic sense. City Attorney Mantzaris stated that this is a Planned Unit Development and anticipates this process 8 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 12, 2022 Council Member Purvis moved to table Ordinance No. 2022-014 to August 23, 2022: Seconded by Council Member Bates. Passed unanimously 5-0 with all members present voicing aye. Item No. 13 — Utility Service Agreement, Ivy Ridge Development Services Director Henschel presented the item. The applicant is requesting sewer service for a 155 lot single-family development on 57 acres located in Lake County south of Hammock Ridge Road and west of Fox Chase subdivision. The subdivision was approved by Lake County through Ordinance 2020-03. The subdivision will consist of 136 fifty foot wide lots and 19 sixty foot wide lots. Lake County Ordinance 2020-03 does not stipulate lot width, only the number of lots. This project is within the City's sewer service area. The applicant is requesting 35,860 gallons per day for sewer capacity. The water service will be provided by a private utility provider, not the City of Clermont. The proposed subdivision, as designed, does not meet the City of Clermont's Land Development Code standards. As proposed, staff is not recommending approval of the Utility Agreement in this format. Should City Council decide to provide sewer services to this development, staff would recommend requiring the annexation of this parcel and a rezoning to R-2 standards which would require 75 foot wide lots. Cecelia Bonifay, Esq., with the Akerman Law Firm spoke on behalf of the owner and developer. This project was a Planned Unit Development (PUD) approved in Lake County and it stated the development would have 50ft wide lots. During the PUD approval process with Lake County, Clermont was asked if they had any comments or objections and none were given. As a utility provider, Clermont has a duty and obligation to serve. This is a great product and project and a benefit to the city. The applicant, Ben Shoemaker gave a presentation to Council regarding the community and what his company model is for developments. He spoke about the lot sizes and why they are smaller than the 75ft the City of Clermont requires. Mayor Murry opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Murry closed the public hearing. Ms. Bonifay stated that the client spent a lot of time and effort planning this community in compliance with Lake County codes. The ordinance proposed requires that it be developed by the Joint Planning Agreement (JPA) land development regulations, the city and county were unclear on the standards within the JPA. This project cannot be developed in compliance with the city's standards. The applicant is asking for a utility agreement that accepts this project as presented. Council discussed the applicant's business model for the community and approving the agreement if the project does not meet the city's standards. They went on to discuss providing services within the city and outside of city limits and if the city has the capacity to provide the services. City Attorney Mantzaris spoke about the legal aspect of providing sewer services outside of the city limits. Council Member Purvis stated that he was ready to make a motion to approve the agreement with annexation. Council Member Entsuah asked about the business model of building homes to rent out. Mr. Shoemaker responded and explained how it all works and stated that they have never evicted a tenant to sell a home. Council Member Pines moved to approve the Utility Service Agreement with R2 Standards, Seconded by Council Member Bates. City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 12, 2022 Discussion was had regarding the language within the sewer agreements and annexing a property into the city that does not meet the standards. Ms. Bonifay stated in closing that the client has worked to buffer this property from the surrounding properties but cannot come to the city and meet the R-2 standards with this project. The motion passed by roll call vote 3-2 with Council Member Bates and Council Member Purvis opposing, Item No. 14 Ordinance No. 2022-031, Final Hazardous Materials AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 34, "ENVIRONMENT" OF THE CLERMONT CITY CODE, BY CREATING NEW ARTICLE VI "HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — COST RECOVERY FOR INCIDENTS" SECTIONS 34-150 THROUGH 34-154 PROVIDING FOR INTENT AND PURPOSE; DEFINITIONS; LIABILITY FOR COSTS; COLLECTION AND PAYMENT OF COSTS; METHODS OF ENFORCEMENT; CODIFICATION SEVERABILITY, CONFLICT, ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION, PUBLICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. City Clerk Howe read the ordinance into the record by legal title only. Fire Chief Ezell stated that with a hazmat incident, this will allow the city to recover the costs that are incurred to clean up. Mayor Murry opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Murry closed the public hearing. Council Member Bates moved to approve Ordinance No. 2022-031: Seconded by Council Member Pines. The motion passed by roll call vote 5-0. NEW BUSINESS Item No. 15 — Ordinance No. 2022-024, Intro Lost Lake Assemblage Annexation AN ORDINANCE UNDER THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND CONTIGUOUS TO THE PRESENT CITY BOUNDARIES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT, SEVERABILITY, ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENERS ERROR, RECORDING, PUBLICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. City Clerk Howe read the ordinance into the record by legal title only. Council Member Bates moved to introduce Ordinance No. 2022-024: Seconded by Council Member Entsuah. Passed unanimously 5-0 with all members present voicing ave 10 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 12, 2022 Item No. 16 — Ordinance No. 2022-025, Intro Lost Lake Assemblage CPA AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE SMALL-SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING ACT, CHAPTER 163, PART II, FLORIDA STATUTES; SETTING FORTH THE AUTHORITY FOR ADOPTION OF THE SMALL-SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT; SETTING FORTH THE PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THE SMALL-SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT; PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE SMALL-SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT; ESTABLISHING THE LEGAL STATUS OF THE SMALL SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT, SEVERABILITY, ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENERS ERROR, PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE. City Clerk Howe read the ordinance into the record by legal title only. Council Member Bates moved to introduce Ordinance No. 2022-025: Seconded by Council Member Purvis. Passed unanimously 5-0 with all members present voicing aye. Item No. 17 — Ordinance No. 2022-026, Intro Lost Lake Assemblage Rezoning AN ORDINANCE UNDER THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT REFERRED TO IN CHAPTER 122 OF ORDINANCE NO. 289-C, CODE OF ORDINANCES; REZONING THE REAL PROPERTIES DESCRIBED HEREIN AS SHOWN BELOW; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT, SEVERABILITY, ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENERS ERROR, RECORDING, PUBLICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. City Clerk Howe read the ordinance into the record by legal title only. Council Member Bates moved to introduce Ordinance No. 2022-026: Seconded by Council Member Purvis. Passed unanimously 5-0 with all members present voicing aye. 11 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 12, 2022 ADJOURN: With no further comments, this meeting adjourned at 11:52pm. T- 4 •XfTEST• Tracy Ackroyd Howe, MMC City Clerk 12 APPROVED: