Loading...
09-01-1998 Regular Meeting• ~ CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 The meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission was called to order Tuesday, September 1, 1998 at 7:00 P.M. by Chairman Robert Smythe. Members present were Joseph Janusiak, Bill Rauch, Marilyn MacLauchlin, Darryl Bishop, Keith Mullins and Scott Grubbs. Members Joseph Wiebush and Michael Floyd were absent. Also attending were Lanny Harker, Director of Planning, Barry Brown, Principal Planner and Mimi Ogden, Planning and Zoning Specialist. MINUTES of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting held August 4, 1998 were approved as presented. 1. REQUEST FOR REZONING APPLICANT: KMH General Partnership GENERAL LOCATION: Parcel generally located approximately 900 feet east of U. S. Highway 27, lying south of Steve's Road. REQUEST: Rezoning from UE Urban Estate Residential District to C-1 Light Commercial District. Planning Director Harker explained that the subject site, located approximately 900 feet east of US Highway 27, south Steve's Road in the Lake Wilma area. This is a ten acre +/- parcel that recently went thru the small scale land use amendment process and the property was designated commercial by the City Council. The applicant is now requesting rezoning to C-1 (Light Commercial District) for the subject parcel. The adjacent City and Lake County parcels westward out to US Highway 27 are presently commercially zoned and/or commercially utilized. At the time of this request no plans have been submitted for specific development of the subject property. Recognizing approval of commercial land use for the site has been approved via the small scale land use amendment process, and that commercial zoning and certain commercial land use is already established adjacent to the site, the City Staffwill recommend approval of the rezoning from UE (iJrban Estate District) to C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial Business District). A motion was made by Bill Rauch to recommend approval to the City Council as presented by staff, seconded by Keith Mullins, approved by a unanimous vote. 2. REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: KMH General Partnership LOCATION: 659 West Juniata Street CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES • PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 Page-2- REQUEST: A request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a professional office in the R-3 ResidentiaVProfessional District. Planning Director Harker explained that the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for a professional office in the R-3 ResidentiaUProfessional District. The subject site lies on the south side of Juniata Street, approximately 200 feet east of the intersection of 7~' and Juniata. Surrounding land uses include the South Lake Hospital medical office center and residential to the north, multi-family residential to the west, and single family residential uses to the east and south. Planning Director Harker explained that, due to the hospital and the expansion of the Central Business District this is generally a transition area. The subject property is situated in the NED-2 (Non-Established District) Future Land Use District which permits professional office development in Block 74. The site also possesses ResidentiaVProfessional Classification on the Future Land Use Map which provides for location of professional office uses in that portion of the City. Inclusive within the Conditional Use Permit application are requests for variance to landscape buffer requirements due to physical constraints pertinent to location of certain existing structures. The City Council will address the items applicable to the variance request. Recognizing the proposed use is consistent with all required zoning criteria, future land use district classification, and future land use map designations for provision of professional office use, and a mixture of land uses including professional office use is established adjacent to the site, Staff recommends approval of the professional office use with the conditions as outlined in the Commissions packet. A motion was made by Marilyn MacLauchlin to recommend approval to the City Council as presented by staff, seconded by Daryl Bishop, approved by a unanimous vote. 3. REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: Denise Pyke Construction LOCATION: 140 Highland Avenue REQUEST: A request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a professional office in the R-3-A ResidentiaVProfessional District. Mr. Harker explained that the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for a professional office for a construction company to be located at the above described property. The subject site is located approximately 150 feet east of the intersection of East and Highland Avenues, on the a~ CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 Page - 3 - north side of the road. Surrounding land uses include professional office, commercial, and the recently approved East Avenue Day Care facility to the west and northwest. Professional offices of various descriptions and the Lake County School Credit Union are located to the east. SR 50 is to the south, and the City Cemetery is on the north. Surrounding zoning is R-3-A (ResidentiaVProfessional District), C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial} and C-2 (Highway Commercial) to the west. R-2 (Medium Density Residential), which includes the cemetery, is located to the north. R-3-A and R-3 (ResidentiaVProfessional District) are provided to the east. The subject property has ERD-8 Future Land Use classification, and ResidentiaVProfessional Land Use Map designation which allow the requested use. Therefore, based upon demonstrated consistency with Future Land Use directives for the area, and compatibility with existing land uses of surrounding properties, Staff recommends approval of the requested use with the conditions as outlined in the Commissions packet. A motion was made by Bill Rauch to recommend approval to the City Council as presented by staff, seconded by Marilyn MacLauchlin, approved by a unanimous vote. 4. REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: PetVet Vaccination Clinics LOCATION: 761 East Highway 50 REQUEST: A request for a Conditional Use Permit to amend Resolution No. 912 to allow the operation of a Veterinary Vaccination Clinic, once monthly, located in the C-2 General Commercial District. Planning Director Harker explained that the applicant is requesting amendment of the Conditional Use Permit for the Clermont Shopping Center to permit the operation of a "mobile" pet veterinary vaccination clinic. The clinic is proposed to occur one Saturday per month for a period of 1 to 1 '/Z hours. Additional information concerning State licensing, inspections, liability insurance, other locations affording clinic activities, and operational information items have been included in your agenda packet for review and evaluation. Mr. Harker stated that this type of facility does provide a vary valuable service to the community. As some of the Commission may recall, during the Clermont Shopping Center remodeling project information was brought forward that parking space at the facility was significantly deficient, approximately 100 spaces, in accordance with generally accepted standards and adopted City requirements. The City Council, after considerable discussion and deliberation, granted a variance • CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 Page - 4 - to the shopping center owner in order to provide ability for needed structure refurbishment and renovation. It must be understood that other resident businesses at the center also rely on having space available to service their established customers and provision of the mobile clinic would essentially enhance an already adverse parking situation at this location. Staff is therefore recommending denial of the request due to the location. Member Keith Mullins asked if this was actually a mobile unit (i.e. truck/van)? Mr. Harker stated that it is his understanding that this would be a truck/van type vehicle and the information would be provided to the public in the parking lot and then proceed to the pet store area for vaccination, etc. Members of the Commission had numerous questions that needed to be addressed by the applicant who was not present at the time. A motion was made by Marilyn MacLauchlin to postpone this case to the last item on the agenda, the motion was seconded by Scott Grubbs and approved by a unanimous vote. 5. REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: Dale Dewitt LOCATION: Property lying south of State Road 50, approximately 2,000 feet east of Grand Highway. REQUEST: A request for a Conditional Use Permit to transfer certain portions of an existing Lake County Conditional Use Permit to the City, and to modify the CUP to allow removal of a berm along State Road 50 and continue borrow operations south of the proposed new berm, located in the C-2 General Commercial District. Mr. Harker explained that the applicant is requesting modification of the existing Lake County Conditional Use Permit (CUP #86/8/3-3) that was transferred from Lake County at the time of the property annexation by the City. The prior approved permit provided permission for site leveling and removal of soil and clay from the subject site. Site leveling activity was approved to be to the grade level of SR 50. Request to amend Condition 2,(C),1 of the County approved CUP is the reason for this application. Specifically, that condition requires the berm along SR 50 to remain in place until all other excavation and reclamation of the entire site takes place. The applicant wishes to amend the condition to permit removal of the berm located adjacent to SR 50 at this time and provide a replacement berm approximately 600 feet south of the highway. Soil extraction on the front 25 +/- acres of the site has been completed. Finish grading of the area is almost complete and required vegetative reclamation activities will be provided when removal of the existing berm has • . CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 Page-S- been fully accomplished. Inherent to berm removal is lowering of the gas transmission line and cooperative approval from the Florida Department of Transportation for right-of--way alteration activities. A complete copy of the formally approved Conditional Use Permit granted by Lake County has been provided in your agenda information packet for review and evaluation purposes. Understanding that a replacement berm will be provided adjacent to SR 50, and visual impact will not be adversely affected by removal of the existing berm, Staffwill recommend approval of a City approved Conditional Use Permit with those conditions as outlined in the Commissions packet. Member Daryl Bishop as if the existing entrance would still be used. Mr. Harker stated that is his understanding. Member Scott Grubbs asked if the berm would have to be landscaped with trees, shrubs, etc. Mr. Harker stated that a condition was not included for landscaping the berm as it is only temporary, however the berm will have to be stabilized. A motion was made by Keith Mullins to recommend approval to the City Council as presented by staff, seconded by Bill Rauch, approved by a unanimous vote. 6. REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: Herb Smith Construction LOCATION: Parcel located approximately 750 feet south of Grand Highway and west of Bloxam Avenue. REQUEST: A request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of amulti-family/ townhouse development, located in the R-3 ResidentiaVProfessional District. Planning Director Harker stated that the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for construction of a fifty-one (51) unit multi-family/townhouse development in the existing R-3 ResidentiaVProfessional District. The site contains 7.12 +/_ acres of land, and is located on the west side of Bloxam Avenue, approximately 750 feet south of the intersection with Grand Highway. Adjacent land use includes multi-family (duplex) and multi-family/townhouse development to the north and east. Vacant land and single family residential to the south, and vacant property to the west. CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 Page-6- Adjacent zoning is R-3 (ResidentiaVProfessional District) and R-1 (Urban Residential District) to the north, south, and west, and C-2 (General Commercial District) to the east. The proposed site is located in the UD-4 (undeveloped district- 4) future land use district that permits up to eight (8) units per acre, and the future land use map classification provides for residential use in this area of the City. The applicant proposes to build the development in two stages. Staff has therefore required that Hunt Street be constructed in Phase I to the western side of the entry to the subdivision. Staff has also required completion of Hunt Street construction to the west property boundary be provided prior to initiation of any portion of Phase 2 of the project construction, should this not be constructed by another development in the interim. Based upon compatibility with existing development patterns, and consistency with future land use directives for the area, staff recommends approval of the multi-family townhouse project subject to the conditions as outlined in the Commissions packet. At this time Chairman Smythe asked all those present who wished to speak in regard to this case be sworn in. Persons sworn in were: Misty O'Bar of 203 Overlook Drive, Clermont, Florida Don Hams of 612 Grand Highway, Clermont, Florida Herb Smith of 16706 Tequesta Trail, Clermont, Florida Marcus McGowan of 230 Overlook Drive, Clermont, Florida Carol McCarthy of 200 Overlook Drive, Clermont, Florida Misty O'Bar stated to Mr. Harker that he had said the property was already zoned properly for this project, however, the notice she received stated that this property was zoned R-1. Mr. Harker showed Ms. O'Bar the correct location for this project. It was determined that the notice she received was regarding the next agenda item. Further discussion followed regarding the location of Hunt Street. Don Hams asked if this project was going to be similar to Southern Villas. Herb Smith, applicant, stated that was correct. Mr. Harris stated his concerns regarding the lack of two car garages in these type of developments. As can be seen in the Southern Villas development, a one car garage is insufficient for the average family in this day and time and the residents end up obstructing the sidewalks with their vehicles, due to a lack of parking. • CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 Page-7- Mr. Harker noted that these are townhomes and in most cases the homeowners association will contend with this type of situation. Mr. Smith stated that his units will have a two car garage. Member Marilyn MacLauchlin asked how wide the standard two car garage is. Mr. Smith stated they can range between 18 to 22 feet wide. Mrs. MacLauchlin noted that the floor plans included in the Commissions packet show the garage only being 14 feet wide. Mr. Smith stated that the plan should show 16 feet. Member Scott Grubbs asked how many units would be in one building. Mr. Smith stated that he believed the longest set would be 11 units. A motion was made by Keith Mullins to recommend approval to the City Council as presented by staff, seconded by Scott Grubbs. Member Marilyn MacLauchlin stated that she would like to see the floor plan corrected prior to City Council taking action on the project. Mr. Mullins added this to his motion, seconded by Scott Grubbs and approved by a unanimous vote. 7. REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: Lake Minnehaha Joint Venture LOCATION: Parcels generally located east of East Avenue and lying both north and south of Grand Highway. REQUEST: A request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development to consist of a 205 unit townhouse development and 266 apartment units, with various amenities such as clubhouses, pools, tennis courts, basketball court, etc. Mr. Harker explained that the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development. The request is essentially for two (2) projects, the first being a 205 unit townhouse community and the second being a 266 apartment unit complex. Each of the projects will include clubhouses, pool, tennis courts, basketball courts and other recreational amenities. The total acreage for both projects is approximately 68 acres, extending from Cherry Knoll south to Spring • C~ CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 Page - 8 - Lake and from East Avenue to essentially the west side of East Lake. The townhouse development is proposed to be on the south side of Grand Highway and the multi-family development is proposed to be north of Grand Highway. Planning Director Harker then introduced Mr. Kevin Hawkins, developer of the project, and asked that he give a prospectus of the project and then Staff would continue with their recommendation. Mr. Hawkins gave a brief synopsis of the project and noted that the project would meet the density requirements of the Citys Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Hawkins stated that there will be no vehicular access to either project from East Avenue or Lake Minneola Drive and there is only one vehicular access on Grand Highway. Mr. Hawkins exhibited pictures of a similar high end project constructed by the same developer and invited all those interested to visit this project. Much further discussion followed. Chairman Smythe asked all those present who wished to speak in regard to this case be sworn in. Persons sworn in were: Arthur James of 300 Division Street, Clermont, Florida James Weeks of 312 Division Street, Clermont, Florida Sam Smith of 306 Division Street, Clermont, Florida Ann Dupee of 389 Division Street, Clermont, Florida Jeffrey Smith of 100 West Montrose Street, Clermont, Florida Marcus McGowan of 230 Overlook Drive, Clermont, Florida Carolyn McGowan of 230 Overlook Drive, Clermont, Florida Lee McCarthy of 200 Overlook Drive, Clermont, Florida Hope Lamb of 519 MarNanMar Clermont, Florida Vivian Ware of 250 Crestview Drive, Clermont, Florida Mr. Lee McCarthy stated that since the shopping center located at Highway 50 and Grand Highway has opened there has been a large increase in traffic on Grand Highway and a large number of these vehicles are speeding and there is very little enforcement. Grand Highway will need to at least be four laned and speed control will need to be enforced. Ms. Carolyn McGowan stated that she lives in Orange Hill Subdivision and noted that there is four or five entrances and exits into the subdivision of approximately 50 houses. The proposed subdivision has a lot more houses and has only three or four exits. Ms. McGowan further stated that she envisions this project to be similar to Greater Hills with an inadequate number of exits. A traffic problem already exists early in the morning with parents dropping their children off at school and trying to get to work, this extra traffic is a great concern to her. • CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 Page-9- Mr. Arthur James thanked Mr. Hawkins for addressing the homeowners of Cherry Knoll, which will be directly adjacent to the 33 acre parcel which will consist of 2b6 apartment units. Mr. James stated that the concerns of the Cherry Knoll homeowners was that the power line be put under ground and they would also like a six foot wall placed between the two projects. Mr. Sam Smith, President of the Cherry Knoll Homeowners Association, stated that they would like to see this project reversed (place the apartments where the townhomes are and visa versa). Mr. James Weeks stated that his biggest concern was the traffic flow, noting that some 670 new households will be coming out onto Grand Highway and noted his concerns regarding the lack of school facilities. Chairman Smythe reminded those in attendance that this land does have value and the Commission can not deny them the right to develop this land as long as it is done in compliance with the City of Clermonts Regulations. Ms. Hope Lamb stated that her concern is that we are developing this area beyond our capabilities to service the people that will be moving into this area. Impact fees will not purchase a police officer, it can only pay for capital outlay. We do not have one paid employee on the payroll to service any fire or any medical emergency, if we were to dia1911 right now there is a good chance someone could die before somebody could respond, because we do not have one person on our payroll to respond in an emergency situation. The Citys of Mt. Dora, Groveland, Leesburg and Tavares do have paid personnel. So we do not have fire, rescue and police protection but we are going to add 2000 people in our neighborhood. Ms. Lamb further stated that there is no one in the room that supports property rights more than she does and she believes this developer has a right to put a development on this property, but it should be one that enhances the community and does not burden the community to the point where we can not service the people that come in. There are schools in this area and as a community we need to plan that area, something that works for all of us. Ms. Lamb stated that there is not room in the schools for the children presently in the community. Again stating that we do not have services for these people, it is a disservice to bring people into our community if we can not guarantee their safety and can not guarantee their children an education. This would be a perfect place to put an elementary school or to add to the junior high school. Ms. Ann Dupee noted that if a computation was done on this property showing the difference if all of this acreage was developed into three and four bedroom single family homes, how many children would be in this development as opposed to the number of children that would be in this project if it were developed as one, two and three bedroom apartments and two bedroom townhomes (which normally don't have more than one child). This land has been available for years if the school board or city would have wanted to purchase this property. The county ambulances are on Highway 27, very close to Cherry Knoll. A mobile home park did look at this property, however the owner did not want to sell to a mobile home park. A low cost housing development also looked at this property, but the owner did no want to sell for that use. • CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 Page - 10 - Mr. Marcus McGowan asked what the comprehensive plan depicted for density on the property. Planning Director Harker stated that the area near Cherry Knoll is designated for 8 units per acre, the area where the townhouses are proposed is six unit per acre and where the single family housing is proposed to go is 4 units per acre. This request is consistent with what has been in the Citys Comprehensive Plan since the mid to late 1980's. Mr. McGowan noted that all of these developments would be dumping out onto a two lane highway, that is already a dangerous road. Planning Director Harker noted that one of the requirements of the Conditional Use Permit would be that the developer provide a means of ingress/egress off of Pitt Street, Hunt Street will also connect with Bloxam Avenue. Essentially what needs to be done is to disburse the traffic in as many directions as possible to the collector roads, as is designated in the Comprehensive Plan. Grand Highway has been designated as a collector road since the Comprehensive Plan was adopted. Bloxam Avenue and Pitt Street are also collector roads. The densities, intensities and the road networks have all been designed within the Comprehensive Plan. A traffic study will divulge what the distribution of this traffic will be, where the impacts will occur and what type of improvements on the roads will need to be done in order to handle those impacts of this development. Mr. McGowan stated that he would like to see the City consider this development and others that are going on in this area, with the velocity that the City has attacked Walmart. Planning Director Harker explained that this is the reason the City will require a transportation analysis and methodology study done to determine where the problem areas will be before construction or development takes place. This development will also impact Highway 27 which will trigger evolvement of FDOT and there will also probably be some county roads involved. The past City Council has entered into an agreement with the Regional Planning Counsel to assist us with our evaluation and appraisal report in our Comprehensive Plan, they have some very good transportation planners on staffthat will be reviewing this information. Planning Director Harker further noted that the City of Clermonts Land Development Regulations do require that power lines be installed under ground. As far as the six (6) foot solid wall, this is an item that will have to be addressed by the City Council. Mr. Harker stated that a review of the conceptual site plan shows a lot of green space with this project, probably somewhere in the neighborhood of 60 to 70%. If these areas were to be developed as single family subdivisions you might end up with forty (40) percent green space. Mr. Harker stated that impact fees can not buy emergency personnel, however it can purchase all of the needed equipment for that personnel. The developer is proposing a large amenities package (i.e. swimming pools, tennis courts, etc.) Some of these amenities were originally planned to be adjacent to some of the existing residential CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 Page - 11 - dwellings. The developer has been through staff review two or three times and has also been to a City Council workshop recently. The orientation of many of these uses have been relocated to take the impacts away from the adjacent neighbors. Mr. Harker further explained regarding the school situation, two schools are presently under construction and are to be opened by August of 1999. Present statistics show that South Lake County, not just the City of Clermont, will need to construct a new school every one and one-half years. The School Board is the one who has to make the decision to spend the dollars to purchase the land. In closing, Planning Director Harker again noted that this plan has gone through several staff review and has also come before the City Council at a workshop meeting, Staff is therefore recommending approval of this project because A) It meets all of the criteria for the density standards that have been in place there since the 1980's and B) It meets the Future Land Use Designation that says this area should be developed in a residential pattern. A member of the audience asked if a traffic study had been done yet. Planning Director Harker stated that one of the requirements of the CUP is that a traffic study be done. Member Darryl Bishop explained that this is a contingency factor. No developer will spend money on a traffic study until after they have approval of the project. The contingency factor is in place so that if all requirements of the traffic analysis are not met, the project can not be developed. Hope Lamb stated that because things were approved in the 1980's does not necessarily make them good planning today. Ms. Lamb further noted that the Citys proposed budget for this year included four paid firefighters that were all removed from the budget because the City did not have the money to pay for even one firefighter. If we can't service the people we need to tell them the truth. Mr. Harker stated that changing the ad valorem tax could pay for fire department personnel. Further discussion followed regarding funding for paid fire department personnel. Ms. Kathy Hillary stated that if a property owners vested property rights are denied litigation could cost millions of dollars in order to compensate this property owner. The better way to approach this would be as a cooperative type situation and negotiate issues such as ingress/egress locations, etc. Hope Lamb made some good points, but in this particular case where you already have vested property rights and a developer who wishes to develop a property in the manner as has been described by this developer, this is a more realistic fact than to speak of future planning. Growth is coming to Clermont, the present City Council has done a very good job in planning for • • CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 Page - 12 - growth as far as the water, sewer and schools, etc. The cooperation of the community that is going to be impacted by this growth is a better way to approach it, rather than to bury your head in the sand and say we are not going to allow this, because the property owner does have rights. The taxes in the City of Clermont would have to go up to cover losses from any kind of settlements that would have to take place, so to think that you can tell someone that they can not do something that they are legally entitled to do is not facing the facts. After further discussion, Planning Director Harker noted that the conditions Staff has recommended be placed on the project is available to the public at City Hall. A motion was made by Bill Rauch to recommend approval to the City Council as presented by Staff, with the assumption that the City Council will hear and discuss the various concerns voiced to the Planning and Zoning Commission by the public. The motion was seconded by Darryl Bishop and approved by a unanimous vote. 8. REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: Eric Kovar OWNER: Don M. Casto Organization LOCATION: Parcel generally located north of State Road 50, east of Grand Highway, west of Citrus Tower Blvd. (aka East Jacks Lake Road) and south of Sunset Village Subdivision. REQUEST: A request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development to consist of single family, multi-family, an Adult Congregate Living Facility and a recreation area. Mr. Harker introduced Mr. Rick McCoy, Project Engineer to present the developers request to the Commission. Mr. Rick McCoy, gave a brief synopsis of the project. Planning Director Harker noted that the single family residential lots along the lake are proposed to be 13,000 square feet and the remainder of the single family lots will be 10,000. Staff recommends approval of this project with those conditions as outlined in the Commissions packet. After a brief discussion regarding proposed transportation improvements, a motion was made by Marilyn MacLauchlin to recommend approval to the City Council as presented by Staff, seconded by Joseph Janusiak and approved by a unanimous vote. • CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 Page - 13 - 4. REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: PetVet Vaccination Clinics LOCATION: 761 East Highway 50 REQUEST: A request for a Conditional Use Permit to amend Resolution No. 912 to allow the operation of a Veterinary Vaccination Clinic, once monthly, located in the C-2 General Commercial District. Planning Director Harker asked Mr. Robert Wade, owner of the shopping center, if he could provide the Commission with any information on this request. Mr. Wade explained that it is his understanding that this is a mobile operation that goes to various pet stores, offering vaccinations at a reduced costs, probably to enhance the sales at the pet store. Further noting that he has not observed the conditions at the shopping center when this operation has transpired in the past. Member Bill Rauch explained that the Commissions concerns were traffic and parking problems at the center. Mr. Wade explained that the Doctors offices in the Wellness center are not open on Saturday, so the center is not as busy as it would be on other days. Member Keith Mullins as if the applicant would be working out of a bus or van. Mr. Wade stated he was unsure. Planning Director Harker asked Mr. Wade to contact the applicant and ask that they attend the Council meeting to answer any questions they may have. A motion was made by Darryl Bishop to recommend denial of the request to the City Council, seconded by Scott Grubbs. The motion was passed with a vote of 5 to 1, with member Bill Rauch voting nay. 9. SMALL SCALE COMPREIIENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS Planning Director Harker explained that three applications have been made for small scale comprehensive plan amendments. C~ CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 Page - 14 - A. APPLICANT: Tweedle Oil Co. Inc. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 511 W. Highway 50; at the southwest intersection of S.R. 50 and Chestnut St. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Clermont lots 8,9,10, and 11, Block 61, Section 24, Township 22, Range 25. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a change from ResidentiaUProfessional land use classification to Commercial land use. B. APPLICANT: George F. Karst, Jr. and Randall L. Karst PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1158 & 1160 Fifth St.; at the northwest intersection of Fifth Street and Chestnut St. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 12 and 13 of Block 61, City of Clermont, Section 24, Township 22, Range 25. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a change from ResidentiaUProfessional land use classification to Commercial land use. C. APPLICANT: Mary E. Wright PROPERTY ADDRESS: 528 Chestnut St.; at the northwest intersection of Fifth Street and Chestnut St. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Clermont lot 14, Block 61, Section 24, Township 22, Range 25. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a change from ResidentiaVProfessional land use classification to Commercial land use. Mr. Harker stated that while staff recommends approval of these requests, it does not want to see commercial uses extended to properties adjacent to the west on the same block or to proliferate along this stretch of S.R. 50. Staff is committed to preventing strip commercial development that reduces level of service ratings and is discouraged by the Department of Community Affairs. This recommendation of approval is predicated on the proximity to a signalized intersection of a state arterial and a city collector and the desire to encourage redevelopment of this immediate area by restoring commercial uses. CITY OF CLERMONT MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 Page - 15 - A motion was made by Marilyn MacLauchlin to recommend approval of the small scale comprehensive plan amendments to the City Council as presented by staff, seconded by Joseph Janusiak, approved by a unanimous vote. There being no further business the meeting was adjourned. ~. ~Bn n ATTEST: ~~, - Mimi O den, Planning a d Zoning Specialist