01-07-1986 Regular MeetingCITY OF CLERI~ONT
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
January 7, 1986
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was
called to order at 7:37 p.m. by Chairman John N. Sargent on
Tuesday, January 7, 1986. Members attending were Debbie Gaines,
Nick Jones, Marie McKinney, Buddy Rogers, John Sargent and Robert
Thompson. Adelbert Evans was excused. Don Beal and James
Shepherd were also absent. Also attending were City Manager
Wayne Saunders, Planning and Zoning Technician Marilyn George and
Councilman Harold Turville.
REZONING REQUEST. Mr. Sargent introduced a request for rezoning
by William and Jane Wilkins and Robert and Irene Milnor for Lots
19, 20, 21, 28, 29 and 30; Hillcrest. The property is zoned R-1
Urban Residential and the request was for R-2 Medium Density
Residential. There are single family, multiple family and duplex
residences on these lots.
City Manager Saunders explained that the Comprehensive Plan will
allow either R-1 or R-2 development in the district, but that the
character of the surrounding properties should be considered in
making a recommendation. Mr. Sargent described the surrounding
properties as being single family homes on three sides and duplex
and multi-family on the north.
Mrs. Wilkins stated that her house (on Lots 19, and 20) has been
for sale for over a year. Because the house was overbuilt for
the neighborhood, she feels it would sell better if it could be
converted to a duplex.
It was reported that one resident of the area had voiced his
objection to the rezoning.
Mr. Saunders pointed out that a request to have Lot 21 rezoned
was denied in the recent past.
After a brief discussion a motion was made by Mr. Jones, seconded
by Mr. Thompson and unanimously approved THAT IT BE RECOMMENDED
TO CITY COUNCIL THAT THE REQUEST TO REZONE LOTS 19, 20, 21, 28,
29 AND 30 FROM R-1 URBAN RESIDENTIAL TO R-2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESI-
DENTIAL BE GRANTED.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. Mr. Sargent explained that the First
Baptist Church had requested a Conditiona 1 Use Permit to a 1 low
construction of a Christian Life Center (recreation/education
building) on Lots 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20; Block 49.
Mr. Saunders explained that construction or expansion of a church
requires a Conditional Use Permit in most zoning districts. He
also mentioned that site plans which have been submitted to City
Hall show that a variance is required from the twenty-five foot
front yard setback requirement to a setback of twenty feet.
Keith Thomas, architect for the project, stated that the variance
was required to allow for future additions to the proposed
structure. He explained that a metal building was to be used,
and that components come in specific sizes, making the variance
necessary.
Mr. Saunders urged that parking requirements be met, and that
grass parking could be permitted. He further stated that
1
CITY OF CLERAfONT
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
January 7, 1986
hardship should be shown for a variance to be granted.
• A lengthy discussion ensued regarding what the building will
actually be used for and who will be allowed to participate in
the use.
The City Manager pointed out that there will be an additional
variance required for a rear yard of only ten feet if another
twenty foot component is added.
In answer to questions from commission members, it was explained
that grass parking wi 11 be used, which wi 11 help with on-site
water retention.
A motion was made by Mr. Rogers and seconded by Mr. Thompson THAT
IT BE RECOMMENDED TO CITY COUNCIL THAT THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR A CHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER FOR THE BAPTIST CHURCH BE GRANTED
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Mr. Thompson withdrew his second
when he realized that the front yard setback of twenty-five feet
would be required. Mrs. Gaines then seconded the motion. After
a discussion regarding the setbacks the motion passed with a vote
of five to one, with Mr. Thompson voting nay.
CONDITIONS
1. The property must be developed in substantial accordance
with an approved site plan.
• 2. If, at a future date, parking at this site proves inade-
quate, the applicant understands and arees that the City may
require additional parking or rescind this CUP.
3. No further expansion of the use or additions to this
facility shall be permitted except as approved by another
CUP.
4. All applicable rules and regulations shall be met, including
final site plan approval, landscaping, drainage, parking and
sign regulations, and all yard setbacks. All required
landscaping must be served with a permanent irrigation sys-
tem and must be properly maintained. The drainage and
stormwater retention requirements of the Lake County Pollu-
tion Control Board and FAC 17-25 must be met, and approved
• by the City Engineer. These areas must be properly main-
tained.
5. This property may be used only as a Christian Life Center.
No other business operation may be conducted from this
facility. This CUP is not transferable to any other
business use, person or corporation.
6. The final Certificate of Occupancy cannot be issued until
each of the stated conditions has been met.
*The parking requirements for the entire church complex should be
calculated and compared to parking that is now available. Any
deficiency in off-street parking requirements should be shown as
delineated parking on the approved site plan for the new project.
2
CITY OF CLERAlONT
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
January 7, 1986
•
•
7. This permit shall expire if construction has not begun
within one year of the date of this CUP.
8. If any of the stated conditions is violated, the applicant
understands and agrees that the City Council may revoke this
CUP by resolution.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. Mr. Sargent introduced a request for a
Conditional Use Permit by Leonard Phillips to allow construction
of two triplexes on the W 1/2 of Lot 9, Lots 11, 12, 13, W 1/2 of
Lot 10 and E 1/2 of Lot 14 less S 120 feet of W 15 feet; Block 24
in the R-2 Medium Density Residential zone.
Mr. Thompson stated a conflict of interest.
Mr. Saunders explained that multiple family development in R-2
zones is permitted with a Conditional Use Permit, and that there
is enough square footage in the property to support two tri-
plexes. He stated that there is a variety of uses in this
neighborhood.
Mr. George Smiley of 352 Osceola Street stated that he felt
duplex development would be more in keeping with the character of
the neighborhood, and that triplexes would be only for the per-
sona 1 gain of the owners.
Libby Ressler of 345 Minneola Avenue felt that triplexes would be
too intensive a form of development for the area.
Fred Nyhuis of 377 Osceola Street mentioned that he felt traffic
would be a problem because the triplexes would add twelve cars to
the neighborhood.
Mr. Rogers stated that maximum use of the property was a
reasonable request on the part of the owner, but he suggested
that there be no connecton on the property for traffic between
Osceola Street and Minneola Avenue.
Mr. Jones stated that he agreed about the through traffic and
that he also would recommend underground utilities and a landscape
buffer for the parking area. Mrs. Gaines and Mrs. McKinney
agreed.
A motion was made by Mr. Jones, seconded by Mrs. McKinney and
. unanimously carried THAT RECOMMENDATION BE MADE TO CITY COUNCIL
TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR TWO TRIPLEXES SUBJECT
TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The property must be developed in substantial accordance with
an approved site plan.
2. If, at a future date, parking at this site proves inade-
quate, the applicant understands and arees that the City may
require additional parking or rescind this CUP.
3. No further expansion of the use or additions to this
faci 1 ity sha 1 1 be permitted except as approved by another
CUP.
4. All applicable rules and regulations shall be met, including
3
CITY OF CLERAtONT
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
January 7, 1986
final site plan approval, landscaping, drainage, parking and
sign regulations, and all yard setbacks. All required
landscaping must be served with a permanent irrigation
• system and must be properly maintained. The drainage and
stormwater retention requirements of the Lake County Pollu-
tion Control Board and FAC 17-25 must be met, and approved
by the City Engineer. These areas must be properly main-
tained.
5. This property may be used only for residential purposes.
No other business operation may be conducted from this
facility. This CUP is not transferable to any other
business use, person or corporation.
6. One triplex shall face Osceola Street and one shall face
Minneola Avenue. Each shall have a separate driveway with
no connection between the streets.
7. A landscape buffer shall be provided to screen the parking
from other residential properties.
8. Electrical service shall be provided underground.
9. The final Certificate of Occupancy cannot be issued until
each of the stated conditions has been met.
10. This permit shall expire if construction has not begun
within one year of the date of this CUP.
• 11. If any of the stated conditions is violated, the applicant
understands and agrees that the City Council may revoke this
CUP by resolution.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. The Chairman introduced a request for a
Conditional Use Permit to allow the Assembly of God Church to add
a covered entrance ramp and a circular drive on the S 35 feet of
Lot 4, Lots 5, 14, 15, 16 and the S 135' of Lot 17; Block 98.
The City Manager explained that churches are a Conditional Use in
most zoning districts, making a Conditional Use Permit necessary
for any alterations or expansion. He suggested that, since the
church was built before current requirements for water retention,
landscaping and parking, that these areas might be addressed now.
Pastor Lester Richardson stated that there was plenty of grass
. parking He said that the main problem was the flight of steps to
the doorway of the church, and that some of the elderly
parishoners were staying home because of the difficult access.
Attorney Dennis Horton stated that, as a neighboring property
owner, he had no objection to the project.
After a brief discussion concerning landscaping and water
retention, a motion was made by Mr. Thompson, seconded by Mrs.
Gaines and approved unanimously THAT APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR THE ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH ALLOWING CONSTRUCTION
OF A COVERED ENTRANCE AND A CIRCULAR DRIVE BE RECOMMENDED TO CITY
COUNCIL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The property must be developed in substantial accordance with
4
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
January 7, 1986
an approved site plan.
• 2. If, at a future date, parking at this site proves inade-
quate, the applicant understands and arees that the City may
require additional parking or rescind this CUP.
3. No further expansion of the use or additions to this
facility shall be permitted except as approved by another
CUP.
4. The final site plan must include satisfactory landscaping,
drainage and parking improvements.
5. This property may be used only as a church. No other
business operation may be conducted from this facility.
This CUP is not transferable to any other business use,
person or corporation.
6. The final Certificate of Occupancy cannot be issued until
each of the stated conditions has been met.
7. This permit shall expire if construction has not begun
within one year of the date of this CUP.
8. If any of the stated conditions is violated, the applicant
understands and agrees that the City Council may revoke this
CUP by resolution.
• AMENDMENTS TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
It was explained that several people had requested amendments to
the recently adopted Comprehensive Plan, and that the City Staff
was recommending certain changes. These amendment requests and
the action taken on each are listed below.
1. Change the following described property from area designated
ERD-1 to area designated ERD-2:
Lots 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 Winona Bay subdivision.
Mr. Sargent stated that he felt the area never should have
allowed multiple family dwellings and that the lakefront property
in particular should be developed single family.
• A motion was made by Mr. Rogers, seconded by Mr. Thompson and
carried with five affirmative votes THAT APPROVAL OF THE CHANGE
OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM ERD-1 TO ERD-2 BE RECOMMENDED TO
CITY COUNCIL. Mr. Sargent voted nay.
2. Change allowable density in area designated ERD-7 from eight
(8) units per acre to twelve (12) units per acre.
Mr. Sargent explained that action on this request would affect
the action necessary on request No. 9.
Mr. Saunders explained that there were two requests for a change
in density to twelve units per acre, and that this change to ERD-
7 is necessary to accomplish the requested change. He stated
that density would be somewhat controlled by zoning in ERD-7,
and that there is very little vacant property in the district,
5
CITY OF CLERAlONT
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
January 7, 1986
most of which is owned by the two applicants. He spoke in favor
of leaving the density at eight units per acre.
• After a discussion regarding existing densities, a motion was
made by Mr. Rogers, seconded by Mr. Jones and approved by a four
to two vote THAT IT BE RECOMMENDED TO CITY COUNCIL THAT THE
REQUEST FOR A CHANGE IN DENSITY OF ERD-7 BE GRANTED. Messrs.
Rogers, Jones, Thompson and Mrs. McKinney voted aye. Mrs. Gaines
and Mr. Sargent voted nay.
3. Change the following described property from area designated
ERD-7 to area designated NED-3:
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13; Block 7;
City Blocks
Mr. Joseph Washuta, who owns a portion of the subject property,
explained that he had purchased the property because commercial
development was possible, and that the adoption of the Comprehen-
sive Plan eliminated the possibility. He stated that the other
property owners affected approved of the commercial zoning. He
pointed out that the ballfield was a buffer between this property
and residential uses to the north.
A motion was made by Mr. Rogers, seconded by Mr. Jones and
unanimously carried THAT IT BE RECOMMENDED TO CITY COUNCIL TO
APPROVE THE CHANGE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY FROM ERD-7 TO
NED-3.
4. Change the following desribed property from area designated
NED-5 to area designated EBD-2:
Lots 11, 12 and W 1/2 of Lot 10; Fairview Place
The City Manager suggested that request No. 12 be considered at
the same time because they are adjacent. Mr. Saunders recom-
mended that both properties be in EBD-2, which would mean denial
of No. 4 and approval of No. 12. This would place the dividing
line on rear property lines.
A motion was made by Mrs. Gaines, seconded by Mr. Jones and
carried by unanimous vote THAT IT BE RECOMMENDED TO CITY COUNCIL
TO DENY THE REQUEST TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM NED-5 TO
EBD-2.
12. Change the following described property from area designated
EBD-2 to area designated NED-5:
Lot 127, Clermont Heights
A motion was made by Mr. Thompson, seconded by Mrs. Gaines and
unanimously approved THAT IT BE RECOMMENDED TO CITY COUNCIL TO
APPROVE THE REQUEST TO CHANGE LOT 127, CLERMONT HEIGHTS FROM EBD-
2 TO NED-5.
5. Include the following described property in Permitted Land
Uses, Item #3, for area designated ERD-2 which allows pro-
fessional offices in limited areas:
Lots 19, 20 and 21 of Block 7; Sunnyside Unit
6
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
January 7, 1986
Mr. Jones declared a conflict of interest.
A motion was made by Mr. Thompson, seconded by Mr. Rogers and
• approved by unanimous vote THAT APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST TO IN-
CLUDE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN ERD-2 BE RECOMMENDED TO CITY
COUNCIL.
6. Change allowable density on areas designated ERD-2 from
eight (8) units per acre to twelve (12) units per acre.
City Manager Saunders explained that, under the Comprehensive
Plan as adopted, R-3 zones in ERD-2 will have to be rezoned to R-
1 or R-2. If this request is granted R-3 zones may remain. He
stated that he was in favor of leaving the density at eight units
per acre.
Mr. Turville urged that it be remembered that the Comprehensive
Plan was well studied before adoption, and that approval of this
request would, with No. 2, make about two-thirds of the City high
density. He stressed that it must be considered what is best for
all of the ERD-2 district, not just for the applicant.
A motion was made by Mr. Jones, seconded by Mr. Rogers and car-
ried by a vote of four to two THAT APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST TO
RAISE THE DENSITY IN ERD-2 FROM EIGHT UNITS PER ACRE TO TWELVE
UNITS PER ACRE BE RECOMMENDED TO CITY COUNCIL. Messrs. Thompson,
Jones, Rogers and Mrs. McKinney voted aye. Mr. Sargent and Mrs.
Gaines voted nay.
• 7. Include the following described property in Permitted Land
Uses, Item #3, for area designated ERD-2 which allows
professional offices in limited areas.
Lots 8 and 9, Block 88, City Blocks
Mr. Saunders explained that the owner of these two lots wished to
construct offices there. He recommended against the amendment.
A motion was made by Mrs. Gaines, seconded by Mr. Thompson and
carried by unanimous vote THAT IT BE RECOMMENDED TO CITY COUNCIL
TO DENY THE REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT TO ERD-2 TO EXPAND THE AREAS
WHERE PROFESSIONAL OFFICES ARE PERMITTED.
8. Change that R-1-A property loated north of Highway 50, east
of Highway 27 in the area designated UD-2 from UD-2 to area
• designated UD-5, and change Permitted Land Uses under UD-5,
Item #4 to read:
"Property designated UD-5 located north of Highway
50 and east of Grand highway should be allowed
high density single or multi-family development
not to exceed 12 units per acre."
The City Manager explained that this property is that recently
annexed at Bob Wade's request. He recommended denial of the
amendment request.
A motion was made by Mr.Jones, seconded by Mrs. Gaines and
approved with four aye votes THAT RECOMMENDATION BE MADE TO CITY
COUNCIL TO DENY THE REQUEST FOR INCREASING THE DENSITY IN UD-5.
7
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
January 7, 1986
Mr. Thompson abstained from voting and Mr. Rogers voted nay.
9. Change the following described property to SHD-1 (Spe-
cialized Housing District) with permitted use being multi-
. family, non-profit housing for elderly and handicapped with
density not to exceed twelve (12) units per acre:
All of Block 5 and Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9 and
10; Block 8 and the east 200 feet of the closed
right-of-way of Broome Street and the south 1/2
of the east 300 feet of the closed right-of-way
of Juniata Street; Woodlawn Subdivision.
Mr. Saunders explained that National Church Residences hoped to
build housing for low income elderly on the subject property, and
that a density of twelve units per acre was necessary.
Mr. Robert Renfrow spoke for National Church Residences, ex-
plaining that the density for elderly housing was less dense than
it sounded because many of the units have only one resident, and
few of them drive cars.
Mr. Paul Lang reported for the applicant that the organization
operates 65 of these residences with 5000 units. He added that
they had been working with local clergy.
Rev. George Becker of Shepherd of the Hills Lutheran Church
stated that there is a real need for housing of this type in this
area.
• The City Manager stated that a variance will be necessary for the
size of the units, since they will not contain 600 square feet as
required by the Zoning Ordinance.
A motion was made by Mr. Jones, seconded by Mr.Rogers and. carried
by unanimouss vote THAT APPROVAL OF ESTABLISHMENT OF SHD-1 WITH A
DENSITY OF 12 UNITS PER ACRE BE RECOMMENDED TO CITY COUNCIL.
10. Include in Permitted Land Uses for areas designated NED-4
the following uses:
Multi-family attached residences
Existing light commercial
After Mr. Saunders explained that the criteria for NED-4 allows
• existing multi-family and light commercial, but does not list
them as permitted uses, and that these uses already exist in NED-
4, a motion wgas made by Mr. Rogers, seconded by Mr. Thompson and
unanimously approved THAT IT BE RECOMMENDED TO CITY COUNCIL TO
APPROVE THE AMENDMENT INCREASING PERMITTED USES IN NED-4.
11. Change the following described property from area designated
UD-5 to area designated EBD-2:
A 250 foot wide strip of property located north of and
including the closed portion of Desoto Street, south of Pitt
Street and east of and adjacent to the Highway 27 right-of-
way.
After the City Manager explained that this area was already
developed commercially in part, and that it should have been in
8
CITY OF CLERMONT
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
January 7, 1986
district EBD-2 originally, a motion was made by Mr. Thompson,
seconded by Mrs. Gaines and unanimously approved THAT IT BE
• RECOMMENDED TO CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE REQUEST TO CHANGE THE
DESIGNATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO EBD-2.
A discussion of the past year's actions was tabled until the
February meeting.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at
11:15 p.m.
i ,..,.,~
C. ~}~~ ~ tom, --~
JOHN N. SARGE , Chairman
AT ST:
~Z
MARILYN G.
•
-~
U
RGE, P & Z Tech 'cian
9
FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT
LAST NAME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAME
Jones, N1Ck Arthur THE BOARD, COUNCIL,COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE ON
WHICH 1 SERVE 1S A UNIT OF
MAILING ADDRESS :
P.O. Box 580
is CITY O
CITY COUNTY O OTHER LOCAL AGENCY O STATE
COUNTY
Cl
t
ermon
Lake
NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY
ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED
January 7, 1986 City of Clermont
NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE
Planning & Zoning Commission
WHO MUST FILE FORM 4
This form is for use by any person serving on either an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee,
whether StatC Oi local, ant? it applies equally to nemuers of adV-sory find ii~iia-adVlSGry bt;dleS .,'i1S) Sre faie~ v.:th 3 Vrstar.b ~C^fllCt Of
interest.
As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the local level differ from the requirements for state officers, this form is divided
into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on local boards (municipal, county, special tax districts, etc.), while PART B is
prescribed for all other boards, i.e., those at the state level.
PART C of the form contains instructions as to when and where this form must be filed.
PART A
VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS ,
[Required by Section 112.3143(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).]
•
The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees PROHIBITS each municipal, county, and other local public officer FROM
VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from
knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal (other than a government
agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes) by whom he is retained.
In any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict:
(a) PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in the matter on which he is
abstaining from voting; and
(b) WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest as a public record in this part below.
NOTE: Commissioners of a Community Redevelopment Agency created or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section 163.357,
Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from
~ting. In such cases, however, the oral and written disclosure of this part must be made.
I, the undersigned local public officer, hereby disclose that on January 7 ~ 19 86
(a) 1 abstained from voting on a matter which (check one):
x inured to my special private gain; or
inured to the special gain of
, by whom I am retained.
~t rVRM 4-REV. 10-64 PAGE I
(b) The measure on which I abstained and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows:
I abstained from voting on the redistricting of property which I own.
--- ~ _
:~ ~ //" r
/ ~ -- _ _ ;
~~ /L-' << t'~c~~G7 ,,rte
,~
Date Filed Signature
~%
6.. i
Please see PART C for instructions on when and where to file this form.
PART 8
VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICERS
Required by Section 112.3143(2), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).]
Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However, any state officer who votes in his official
capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain of any principal by whom he is retained is required
to disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in Part B below within 15 days after the vote occurs.
I, the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclose that on
(a) I voted on a matter which (check one):
inured to my special private gain; or
inured to the special gain of
(b) The measure on which I voted and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows:
Date Filed Signature
Please see PART C below for instructions on when and where to file this form.
19
by whom I am retained.
PART C
FILING INSTRUCTIONS
This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (15}days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the per.
responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. This form need c7~
be filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict.
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES 41 !2.317(1983), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY
BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT,
DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED SS,000.
CE FORM 4 -REV. 10-84 pq~;E
FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT
LAST NAME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAME
Thompson, Robert D. THE BOARD, COUNCIL,COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE ON
WHICH 1 SERYE 1S A UNIT OF:
MAILING ADDRESS
742 Pine Lane
CITY O COUNTY O OTHER LOCAL AGENCY ^ STATE
CITY COUNTY
Clermont Lake
NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY
ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED
January 7, 1986- ~ City of Clermont
NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE
Planning & Zoning Commission
WHO MUST FILE FORM 4
This form is for use by any person serving on either an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee,
whether state or local, and it applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are faced with a voting conflict of
interest.
As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the local Level differ from the requirements for state officers, this form is divided
into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on local boards (municipal, county, special tax districts, etc.), while PART B is
prescribed for all other boards, i.e., those at the state level.
PART C of the form contains instructions as to when and where this form must be filed.
PART A
VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
[Required by Section 112.3143(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).]
•
The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees FROHIBITS each municipal, county, and other local public ojfcer FROM
VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from
knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal (other than a government
agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes) by whom he is retained.
In any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict:
(a) PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in the matter on which he is
abstaining from voting; and
(b) WITHIN I S DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest as a public record in this part below.
NOTE: Commissioners of a Community Redevelopment Agency created or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section 163.357,
Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from
~ting. In such cases, however, the oral and written disclosure of this part must be made.
I, the undersigned local public officer, hereby disclose that on January 7 ~ 19 86
(a) I abstained from voting on a matter which (check one):
inured to my special private gain; or
xx inured to the special gain of Leonard Phillips , by whom 1 am retained.
~t rUKM 4-REV. 10.84 PAGE I
(b) The measure on which 1 abstained and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows:
I abstained from voting on a Conditional Use Permit for a property
owner whose property is listed in my Real Estate office.
~ ; ~~~
Ls~?--~ ~
Date Filed
•
Signature
Please see PART C for instructions on when and where to file this form.
PART B
VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICER8
[Required by Section ! 12.3143(2), Florida Statutes {Supp. 1984).]
Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However, any state officer who votes in his official
capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain of any principal by whom he is retained is required
to disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in Part B below within 15 days after the vote occurs.
I, the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclose that on , 19
(a) I voted on a matter which (check one):
inured to my special private gain; or
inured to the special gain of
(b) The measure on which I voted and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows:
Date Filed
Signature
Please see PART C below for instructions on when and where to file this form.
by whom I am retained.
PART C
FILING INSTRUCTION8
This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (1 S) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the perm
responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. This form need r~.
be filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict.
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTESQI 12.317(1983), A FAILURETO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAti
BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT
DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED fS,000.
CE FORM 4-REV. 10-84 PAG