Loading...
03-18-1987 Workshop Meeting L861 '81 q~~ew: ~N1J.aaw: dOHSIllOM 'allZ USA ~o~~a~la a~ueu14 PU8 psa~s~u1~dS ~aau1~u3 A~J~ '~~ll~ad ~o~~a~la ~UIUU81d 's~apunss ~a~8u8W: A~l~ a~a~ ~uasa~d SlS1~1}}0 A~J~ ~aq~o .al1IA~n~ ma~ O~d ~OA8W pue }}nH ~aqmaw 11~uno~ 'aadna ~aqmaw 11~uno~ :a~U8pUa~~8 UJ s~aqmaw: 11~uno~ ~UIAOII0J aq~ q~l~ 100d ~OA8W: Aq 'w'd 00:9 ~8 ~ap~o o~ pal18~ se~ ~uI~aaw aqJ. 'mOOll aoua~aJuo~ lleH A~l~ aq~ U1 L861 '81 q~~ew 'AspSaUpat1 Plaq ss~ ~uom~al~ }O A~l~ aq~ JO 11~uno~ A~l~ aq~ }O ~ul~aaw: doqs~~oM V aNVJ.S NOIssa~NO~ OJ. NOIJ.Iaav -aaJ.J.IWW:O~ an~V31 a1J.J.I1 'UOI~~8 11~uno~ ~O} jUJ~aam v861 'VZ q~~8W: aq~ }O epuaj8 aq~ uo paosld aq Plno~ ~a~~em slq~ ~8q~ pauJeldxa ~aq~~n} s~apunes .~w: 'A~l~ aq~ o~ asuadxa ou aq Plno~ a~aq~ Aqa~aq~ pa~suop uaaq p8q s181~a~8m PU8 ~oq81 q~noua ~eq~ paul81dxa se~ ~1 pus pa~uasa~d seA U01su8dxa .01 x .01 pasodo~d aq~ }O ~uI~dan1q V 'Plal4 an~8a1 aI~~11 aq~ ~s pU8~S uOIs -sa~uo~ aq~ o~ U01~IPP8 us ~~n~~suoo o~ u01ssJm~ad ~ul~sanba~ se~ aa~~lmmo~ an~ea1 al~~11 aq~ ~eq~ pauJ81dxa s~apunss ~a~8u8W A~l~ J.Nawssva aAIlla allOHSalV1 'a~81 leu~a~ul ue pa~apIsuo~ aq Plnoqs 8uou1M a~s1 ~ou ~o ~aq~aq~ aso~e u01~sanb aqJ. .lIsa~81 leu~a~ullI aS8~qd aq~ }O uOI~e~a~d~a~uI aq~ ~aAO ~uawaa~~e -SIP q~l~ 'passn~slP se~ a~el leu~a~uJ Aue mo~} ~a~eA dmnd o~ A~~a -do~d pau~o-A~J~ }O ~UISSO~O aq~ ~uI~lqJqo~d uOI~nlosall S.A~I~ aqJ. 'sasod~nd u01~e~1~~1 ~O} SUOUIM a~s1 }O ~no ~a~8~ dwnd o~ uOJs -slw~ad a~ll Plno~ s~ua~g aq~ 'u~n~a~ U1 'uoI~e~ol ~8q~ ~e aA~n~ aq~ }O sn1ps~ aq~ a~~elua o~ ~ap~o UJ '~uamassa 18uoJ~lPps us A~J~ aq~ aAI~ IlJ~Aaq~ pa~e~JpuI aA8q 'aAJ~a a~oqsa~81 uo aA~n~ 006 aq~ uo aA1l oq~ 's~ua~a aq~ ~eq~ 11~uno~ aq~ pam~oJuI s~apun8S ~a~eu8W: A~l~ .a~8p ~a~el 8 ~8 ll~uno~ o~ ~~sq ~~oda~ pue uOI~sm~o}uI papaau aq~ ule~qo Plno~ aq ~8q~ pa~e~s s~apunss ~aj8uew: A~l~ 'a~el aq~ mO~J dwnd O~ maq~ ~u1~011e O~ aA1~eu~a~le U8 ss 's~ua~a aq~ ~OJ U01~8~1~~1 ap1Ao~d O~ lla~ ~olleqs 8 ~Ull11~P }O ~SO~ aq~ 0~u1 ~001 A~l~ aq~ ~eq~ pa~sa~~ns S8A ~l 'UOlssnoslP awos ~a~}V J.Naw:a~V1dall a~aIlla VNON1t1 alV1 aNV J.~arOlld ~N1AVd aAIlla allOHSalV1 .11~dV }O ~uI~aam puo~as aq~ apem aq Ala~ll ~som Plno~ p~S~8 Plq 8 ~OJ uOJ~epuammooa~ e pue. 'ssa~o~d ~UJPPJq aq~ q~l~ paa~o~d Plno~ A~J~ aq~ ~8q~ pa~s~lpuI uaq~ s~apunes ~a~susw: A~l~ '~~aro~d aq~ auod~sod O~ a~lsap e passa~dxa auo ou 'uOIssn~slP q~nm ~a~}v .118} 11~un ~~aro~d aq~ ~Uluod~sod ~ap1Suo~ O~ paqs1A 11~uno~ aq~ JI pa~s8 aH .~I}Je~~ ~eoq ~salAeaq aq~ aA8q q~lq~ sq~uom ~ammns aq~ ~UI~np s~~aro~d aq~ }O uOJ~~n~~suoo a~sld Plno~ slq~ ~8q~ u~a~uo~ slq passa~dxa s~apun8S ~a~eu8W: A~J~ '~~aro~d ~uama~81da~ a~P1~a euoulM a~81 aq~ pue ~~aro~d ~u1Aed aAI~a a~oqsa~81 aq~ ~O} sPlq ~O} aS1~~aApe o~ Apea~ ~ou ss~ A~J~ aq~ ~8q~ pa~~oda~ pea~s~u1~dS ~aau1~Ua A~J~ WVll~O~d NllaJ.NI Va1ll014 jO lJ.ISllaAINn 'auop ~ulaq seA Apn~s aq~ pOl~ad sq~uom aa~q~ aq~ ~O} ~uI~POl apJAo~d o~ aq Plno~ ~~ed s,~osuods aq~ uo ~uam~Jmmo~ AluO aqJ. .uasoq~ SJ ~aAa~8q~ ~o suol~~aro~d uOJ~slndod 'aseq ~lmouo~a S~J jUlu~a~uo~ A~lunmmo~ 8 ~O} Apn~s e ~onpuo~ IlJ~ A~Js~aAlun aq~ mo~} u~a~uJ U8 Aqa~aqA m8~~0~d 8 ~U1~osuods sl 8PI~014 JO A~Js~aAIUn aq~ ~8q~ paul81dxa ~a~8uew A~J~ aqJ. e e WORKSHOP MEETING March 18, 1987 Page -2- The Chamber of Commerce and the South Lake Economic Development Council have each committed themselves to paying for one month's lodging for such a program, and the Chamber has asked if the City would be interested in par~icipating. It was further explained that if the City did participate, it would have input into the scope of the project. It was pointed out that the City of Eustis undertook such a project which resulted in a useful study for that area. This item will be placed on the agenda of a future Council Meeting. MINNEOLA HARBOUR HILLS PROJECT It was reported that the City had met twice with representatives of the Minneola Harbour project, and some amendments to their proposed annexation agreement and Conditional Use Permit had already been made. However, there were still many areas of the proposal to be discussed and other changes to be made. The proposed annexation would take in the left side of Highway 561, which is made up of the Inland Groves and Lucas properties. From a management and planning perspective, it would be more desirable to also annex the strip of property on the lake side, going out to the Minneola Harbor property. Otherwise, a county enclave would be located within the city limits. This would involve an involuntary annexation. It was suggested that the developers form a strategy to try and convince these people to annex into the City. It was also explained that the Harbour Hills developers would like to go ahead, as soon as possible, with their voluntary annexation, and not tie this process with the involuntary annexation of the lakeside property. Continuing with his explanation, Mr. Saunders stated that their plan for the City to pump the treated effluent back to their site for spraying on the golf course was not an economically feasible project to undertake. City Engineer Springstead explained the costs involved to provide the extra pumping facilities and treat- ment. It was discussed that this would be a good option to hold open for the future, and their conditional use permit could con- tain a condition providing that the City has the option at ~ome future date to utilize the golf course as a sprayfield. The next topic of discussion was the water system for the develop- ment. The developers have proposed that two water wells, indepen- dent of the City's system, be provided. It was discussed that it would be a much better situation if their system was looped with the City's. This would require placing a water main from the existing water system at the city limits to the proposed development. This type of arrangement would be mutually beneficial to both parties. It was suggested that the City could pay the difference in the cost of pipe sizes needed to serve the development and those required to serve other areas the City mi~ht choose to annex and ser.ve in the future in this 9reA. Another area of concern discussed was streets. It has been proposed that the streets will be dedicated city streets, reserving the right to install a guard gate at the entrance of the complex, and reserving e e WORKSHOP MEETING March 18, 1987 Page -3- the right at some future date to take the streets back from the City and make them private again. It was the consensus of those present that the streets should be dedicated City streets with no guard house and no provisions to become private again. Council Member Cole came to the meeting at approximately 6:55 p.m. City Manager Saunders also stated that the developers would be requesting variances with regard to required rights-of-way on all the streets in the development. They would, however, dedicate additional easements. Sketches of the proposed types of homes in the development were discussed. It was pointed out that each of the housing types would require variances in one form or another (lot coverage, setbacks, etc). Of special concern, that was pointed out by City Engineer Springstead, was the zero lot line patio home. It was questioned how the owner would maintain the side of his home located on the property line without encroaching on his neighbor's property. It was further stated that this particular housing type appeared to be an attempt to have a smaller lot for a single family home. Project revenue and expenditure projection data was given each Council Member. The handout indicated that the water and sewer services could operate in the black, but the general fund would subsidize the project for several years. It was projected that for each of the first five years there would be a loss to the City regarding the revenue and expenses generated by the project. The most costly service to the City would be providing police protection. The other large expenditure would be during the fifth year for the fire department. At that time, the number of homes in the area would require the placement of a sub- station and equipment in or near the development. With regard to the recreation fee, City Manager Saunders explained that the developer is proposing 1/2 of 1% which calculates out to just over $31,000. All of the facilities being planned will be private, although it has been stated that some portion of the facilities will be public at the beginning. They have reserved the right turn any and/or all of the facilities private at any given time. After much discussion, it was felt that it would be in the best interest of the City if all of the recreation facilities were to be exclusive, then the City should require between and 3 and 5% contribution for recreation. An alternative way to calculate the impact fee for water and sewer from what the developer had suggested was also explained by City Manager Saunders. The impact fee for the development would be calculated on the projected expenditures for a new plant expan- sion which City Engineer Springstead is working on now. Whatever percentage of the capacity the development would require would be their impact fee for the total development. One-half of the fee would be paid at the beginning, and they would receive a credit of one-half of an impact fee with each hookup, and at the time of the last hookup, we would be even. In this manner, the City would have some form of insurance because it would have some of their money on hand during the phasing of the project. The City would be working on the treatment plant expansion and spending dollars which were projected to be received from the impact fees from this project. e . WORKSHOP MEETING March 18, 1987 Page -4- After some further discussion of the entire project, City Manager Saunders stated that he would set up another meeting with repre- sentatives of Harbour Hills and submit those changes the City would like to see in the annexation agreement and PUD request. These changes and additions would include: (1) One-half of the impact fees will be paid upon granting the PUD, (2) the developer will provide a fire station and equipment at the five year point of the project, (3) unless they leave some portion of the proposed recreation facilities open to the public, the City would expect a 5% recreation contribution, (4) the various housing types should meet City Codes regarding setbacks and lot coverage, (5) the water system be a looped system connected with the City's and the City would have the option to pay the price difference due to increased size of pipes in both the water and sewer systems to be installed, (6) at a future date, the City would have the option to utilize the golf course site as a sprayfield, and (7) the streets would be dedicated to the City with no guard house being installed and no permission for returning the streets back to the developer. Following this, Mayor Pool stated that he would like to discuss with the Council Mr. Bob Wade's proposed road through his property located north and east of Quincy's. Mr. Wade wishes to grade a dirt road running from his eastern piece of property, between the two sections of Jack's Lake, and up to his property behind Quincy's. Mr. Wade wanted to know what was required by the City in order for his to begin this project. City Engineer Springstead indicated that he had previously written a letter stating what would have to be done in the area between the two lakes since this is in the flood plain and below the ordinary high water mark. Mr. Springstead explained what was required in that area. City Manager Saunders indicated that he had an appointment with Mr. Wade the following morning to discuss what had to be done. There being no further discussion, the meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m. ~ () -LJnrL ~~~ A. Po~1~~7Mayor Attest: e, City C erk e e FORM 8BMEM.' ANDUM-OF VOTING .vONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS CITY Clermont, FL COUNTY Lake - NAME OF BOARD. COUNCIL, COMMISSION,' AUTHORITY, OR COMMllTEE Clermont City Council THE BOARD, COUNCIl., COMMISSION, AUTHORITY. OR COMMITIEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF: x: CITY . . COUNTY i ; OTHER LOCAL AGENCY NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: City of Clermont I.AST N.o\ME-FIRST NAI'\IE-MIDDLE NAME Huff, Richard L. MAIL Nt; ADDRESS P.O. Box 659 DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED March 24, 1987 MY POSITION IS: X ELECTIVE APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 88 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; although the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by law. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES ELECTED OFFICERS: A person holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. In either case, you should disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from vOling; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a mailer in which he has a conflict of interest, but must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whether made by the officer or at his direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: . · You should complete and file this form (before ma~ing any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the "form in the minutes. · A copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. · The form should be read publicIy at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest. (I IIIIHI"B III.M(, PAGE I . . . IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION OR VOTE AT THE MEETING: . I ,.', . o You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. o You should complete the form and file it within IS days after the vote occurs with the person respoSlsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. DISCLOSURE OF STATE OFFICER'S INTEREST I, Richard L. Huff , hereby disclose that on March 24 ,19~: .c.t,_' . (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) -X- inured to my special private gain; or to: . _ inured to the special gain of , by whom I am retained. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: The final reading of Ordinance 174-M closing a portion of Eleventh Street, whi.ch runs through the proposed subdivision I am developing. April 13, 1987 Date Filed ~~ Signature r NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES ~1I2.317 (l985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS fOR AND MAYBE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE Of THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR E~IPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000. PAGE 2 CE FORM 88 . 10-86