Minutes - 05.20.2024 - Code Enforcement BoardCITY OF CLERMONT
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
MINUTES
MAY 209 2024
CALL TO ORDER
Chair May called the meeting of the Code Enforcement Board to order on Monday, May 20,
2024, at 6:01 pm.
ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair May, Vice -Chair Camps, Member Falcone, Member Fornoles,
Member Forth, Member Kilburn, and Member Whitehead
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
ALSO PRESENT: Code Enforcement Officers Cortez, Snodgrass, and Rebando; Code
Enforcement Manager Wallace, Code Board Attorney Brackins, City Attorney Mantzaris, City
Attorney Brandt, Development Services Director Henschel, and Development Services
Coordinator Heard
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE
MINUTES
Motion to wwrove the Minutes for the April 15, 2024 Code Enforcement Board Special Meetine:_
Moved b. Member Kilburn: Seconded by Member Whitehead. Motion Passed 7-0.
OPENING STATEMENT
Chair May made the opening remarks.
SWEARING IN WITNESSES
Code Enforcement Officers Wallace, Cortez, Snodgrass, and Rebando, city staff, along with any
of the public who may testify were sworn in.
OTHER BUSINESS
City Attorney Brandt explained the agenda before them indicating they will begin with presenting
cases where respondents were present.
(The following agenda items were heard out of agenda order.)
ITEM 1— CASE NO. C2301-0041
Angela Mojica Special Needs Trust
1610 E. Bowman Street
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 1610 E. Bowman Street
REQUEST: Reduction of Fine
Code Enforcement Board Meeting
May 20, 2024
The Respondent was present and sworn in.
Officer Cortez introduced the case. He detailed the case summary and gave its history, exhibited
pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the property on the dates taken. He stated the
property is currently in compliance with an outstanding fine of $16,350, and the respondent has
requested the fine be rescinded. Staff recommends reducing the fine to $1,635.
Respondent Christian Arroyo, 1610 E. Bowman Street, explained his home is listed under his
daughter's name, Angela Mojica, and he paid for the permit and placed the permit under his wife's
name. He said he had to pay for the permit again to place it under his daughter's name. He further
stated he had to pay for the permit four times to change the name.
Discussion ensued regarding the case.
Board Attorney Brackins explained the options the board can take.
City Attorney Brandt explained the case in more detail.
Board Attorney Brackins explained for the record that the board is looking through the documents
the respondent submitted.
Member Fornoles made a motion to reduce the fine in Case No. C2301-0041 from $16350 to
$817.50 to be paid on or before June 19. 2024: and further. failure to nav will result in reverting
the fine to its original amount of $16.350: seconded btu Vice -Chair CamDs. Motion passed 7-0.
ITEM 2 — CASE NO. C2404-0064
Lou Natem LLC
615 E. Colonial Drive
Orlando, FL 32803
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 1203 W. Highway 50
REPEAT VIOLATION: Repeat with Fine, Section 34-135 Local Business Tax Receipt,
Section 34-126 Required, Section 34-132 Application for Business Tax Receipt
City Attorney Brandt introduced the case.
The Representative for Respondent was present and sworn in.
Officer Rebando stated this case is a repeat with fine and explained the following violations:
Section 34-135 Local Business Tax Receipt, Section 34-126 Required, Section 34-132 Application
for Business Tax Receipt. He further stated this is a self -initiated case that is currently in
compliance. He detailed the case summary and gave its history, exhibited pictures that are a true
and accurate depiction of the property on the date taken, and read the violation, dates, and staff
recommendation.
Jamie Zwicker, First Capitol Property Group, management company for Lou Natem LLC
(Representative for Respondent), stated she was surprised this was a repeat violation and that it
went straight to a hearing. She further explained the tenant was very responsive after she informed
him of the violation. She asked for an appeal or fine reduction due to the tenant's oversight because
of a family emergency.
2
Code Enforcement Board Meeting
May 20, 2024
Discussion ensued regarding repeat violations. It was clarified that this repeat violation does not
mean that this tenant is a repeat violator. This violation is a repeat from a different tenant, but the
violation is on the owner of the building. City Attorney Brandt explained that the repeat violation
starts over on this date for the next five (5) years.
Vice -Chair Camps made a motion to find the Respondent was in repeat violation in Case No.
C2404-0064: however. the Respondent did correct the violation. The Respondent is ordered to
refrain from repeating this violation. If Respondent does not comDN with this order. a fine of S250
Per day. Further, moved to impose a one-time fine of $2.500 and order the City to record the
Findings ofFact immediately: Seconded bi, Member Falcone. Motion passed 7-0.
City Attorney Brandt asked for a point of order stating that the wording in the motion was a fine
of $2,500; however, it should be $250 per day for 10 days.
For clarification, Board Attorney Brackins recited the motion to state:
A fine of S250 Der dav for every dav in violation from April 23. 2024 to Mav 2. 2024, for a total
fine amount of52,500.
Vice -Chair Camps stated "So moved. " Seconded by Member Whitehead. Motion 1)assed 7-0.
ITEM 3 — CASE NO. C2303-0012
EMF of Winter Park, Inc.
2964 Lake Jean Drive
Orlando, FL 32817
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 185 US Highway 27
REQUEST: Reduction of Fine
City Attorney Brandt introduced the case.
The Respondent was present and sworn in.
Officer Cortez detailed the case summary and gave its history, exhibited pictures that are a true
and accurate depiction of the property on the date taken, and read the violation, results of
inspection, fines owed and staff s recommendation.
Respondent Max Thakkar, 185 US Highway 27, explained the unit is under construction and
explained his medical condition which affected his work.
Board Attorney Brackins clarified stating the City is recommending an 80% reduction to $1,600,
and the respondent is requesting the fines be reduced to zero. Respondent Thakkar answered in the
affirmative due to his medical situation.
Member Forth made a motion to reduce the fine in Case No. C2303-0012 to $1.600 to be ,paid on
or belore June 19. 2024: and further. failure to pay, will result in the line reverting back to the
original amount of$8,000; Seconded bi? Vice -Chair Camps. Motion passed 6-1 with Chair Mati•
opposing.
3
Code Enforcement Board Meeting
May 20, 2024
NEW BUSINESS,
(The, following agenda items were heard out of agenda order.)
ITEM 5 — CASE NO. C2404-0041
Singh Ramlahkhan
13299 Highland Woods Drive
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 699 US Highway 27 (Gabby's Banquet Hall)
VIOLATION: Sec 18-53 Nuisances, Sec 18-54 Creation of Nuisance by Property Owner
Declared Unlawful
City Attorney Mantzaris introduced the case and stated they have been in contact with the
respondent's attorney; and further, they have entered into a stipulated agreement. He explained no
evidence will be presented, and the respondents are not disputing any issues, which involved the
creation of a nuisance that happened on the premises that resulted in further activities. He stated
they are requesting the board adopt their recommendations, which the respondent was in
agreement to.
The Respondent was present and sworn in.
Board Attorney Brackins asked if the respondent is in agreement with staff s recommendation.
Respondent Singh Ramlahkhan, 699 US Highway 27, stated he is in agreement with staff s
recommendation.
Vice -Chair Camps made a motion to find the Respondent was in violation in Case No. C2404-
0041. Further. if the Respondent reheats the violations. the Respondent may be brought back
before the Code Enforcement Board as a reveat violation; Seconded by Member Kilburn. Motion
passed 7-0.
ITEM 7 — CASE NO. C2312-0020
Karen Shaver
500 Shady Nook Drive
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 500 Shady Nook Drive
VIOLATION: Sec 18-92 Prohibition of Storage of Certain Items
City Attorney Mantzaris introduced the case.
The Respondent, Karen Shaver, was present and sworn in.
Officer Rebando explained the following violation: Sec 18-92 Prohibition of Storage of Certain
Items. He stated this is a self -initiated case that is currently not in compliance. He detailed the case
summary and gave its history, exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the
property on the dates taken, read the violation, dates, and staff s recommendation.
El
Code Enforcement Board Meeting
May 20, 2024
Respondent Karen Shaver, 500 Shady Nook Drive, requested an extension stating the RV is a work
in progress. She stated she started working full-time last week and should be able to get a tag on it
fairly soon.
Board Attorney Brackins asked her how long she needs to come into compliance. Respondent
indicated 60 days.
Member Kilburn made a motion to find the Respondent is in violation in Case No. C2312-0020.
and is ordered to correct the violation on or before June 19, 2024. If Respondent does not comph,
with this order, a fine of $150 per day for every day in violation after- June 19. 2024, will accrue
until corrected. And further, the Respondent is ordered to contact the Code Enforcement Office to
arrange an inspection of the Droperiv to verify compliance; Seconded by Vice -Chair Camps._
Motion passed 7-0.
ITEM 8 — CASE NO. C2404-0026
Fitsum Araia
231 Camelot Loop
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: Bloxam Avenue (AK 1616646) (Vacant Lot)
VIOLATION: Sec 302.4 IMPC Weeds
City Attorney Brandt introduced the case.
The Respondent was present and sworn in.
Officer Rebando explained the following violation: Sec 302.4 IMPC Weeds. He stated this is a
self -initiated case that is currently in compliance. He detailed the case summary and gave its
history, read the violation, dates, exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the
property on the dates taken, and read staffs recommendation.
Respondent Fitsum Araia, 231 Camelot Loop, explained the circumstances surrounding this
violation.
Member Falcone made a motion to find the Respondent was in violation in Case No. C2404-0026:
however. the Respondent did correct the violation. II the Respondent repeats the violation, the
Respondent will be brou2,ht back before the Code Enforcement Board as a repeat violation;_
Seconded by Member Forth. Motion passed 7-0.
ITEM 14 — CASE NO. C2405-0008
Thoen Johannes L Trustee
251 Crestview Drive
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 251 Crestview Drive
VIOLATION: Sec. 125-522 General Development Conditions, IPMC 111.1.4 Unlawful
Structure, IPMC [F] 704.6.1.1 Group R-1, IPMC [P] 504.2 Fixture Clearances, IPMC 605.1
Installation, IPMC 111.1 Unsafe Conditions, Sec. 18-130 Accumulation of Certain Materials, Sec.
125-521 Fences and Walls
5
Code Enforcement Board Meeting
May 20, 2024
City Attorney Mantzaris introduced the case.
The Respondent, Attorney and Tenant were present and sworn in.
Officer Cortez explained the following violations: Sec. 125-522 General Development Conditions,
IPMC 111.1.4 Unlawful Structure, IPMC [F] 704.6.1.1 Group R-1, IPMC [P] 504.2 Fixture
Clearances, IPMC 605.1 Installation, IPMC 111.1 Unsafe Conditions, Sec. 18-130 Accumulation
of Certain Materials, Sec. 125-521 Fences and Walls. He stated this complaint came in from a
citizen, and the property is currently not in compliance. He detailed the case summary and gave
its history, violations and dates, exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the
property on the dates taken. He further stated he consulted with the City's Building Official who
directed him to condemn the structure as unsafe due to issues of health, safety, and welfare. He
clarified that the tenant contacted code enforcement.
Lindsay Holt, Esq., Crawford, Modica & Holt, stated she represents the Respondent, Thoen
Johannes L Trustee, and explained this property has a pending eviction with Lake County, and this
complaint was made after the eviction notice. She further stated they stipulate that the property is
in violation, and the respondent is almost in compliance with all of the violations, and requested
the respondent be given until June 19th to come into compliance.
Rusche Lauren, Tenant, 2200 E. Highway 50, stated she had asked the respondent to fix certain
things since last December. She explained the circumstances surrounding their landlord/tenant
agreement and ongoing conflicts. In conclusion, she stated the respondent knew this dwelling was
unsafe, but she continued to rent it out.
Lindsay Holt followed up by stating there are many pending landlord/tenant issues that are
accounted for in the pending court case.
Member Forth made a motion to find the Respondent is in violation in Case No. C2405-0008; and
is ordered to correct the violation on or before June 19. 2024. If Respondent does not comply with
this order. a fine of$250 per day for every day in violation after June 19. 2024. will accrue until
corrected. The Respondent is ordered to contact the Code Enforcement Office to arranze an
inspection of the property to verity compliance with the order. And further. the Board finds that
the violations present a serious threat to the public health. safefi . and welfare; Seconded by
Member Fornoles. Motion passed 7-0.
ITEM 19 — CASE NO. C2404-0035
Kings Ridge Golf Club of Lake County LLC
1950 Kings Ridge Blvd
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 1950 Kings Ridge Blvd
VIOLATION: Sec. 125-522 Building Permit Required, IPMC 111.1 Unsafe Conditions, IPMC
111.1.4 Unlawful Structure, IPMC 112.2 Temporary Safeguards, IPMC 111.1.2 Unsafe
Equipment, Florida Fire Prevention Code 1, 10.10.6.1
City Attorney Mantzaris introduced the case.
The Representative for Respondent was present and sworn in.
Code Enforcement Board Meeting
May 20, 2024
Officer Cortez explained the following violations: Sec. 125-522 Building Permit Required, IPMC
111.1 Unsafe Conditions, IPMC 111.1.4 Unlawful Structure, IPMC 112.2 Temporary Safeguards,
IPMC 111.1.2 Unsafe Equipment, Florida Fire Prevention Code 1, 10.10.6.1. He stated this
complaint came in via in-house by Clermont Fire Inspector Danny McAvoy, and is currently not
in compliance. He detailed the case summary and gave its history, violations and dates and
exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the property on the dates taken. He
further stated staff s recommendation with an order that the violations constitute a threat to the
public health, safety and welfare.
City Attorney Mantzaris informed the board that Fire Inspector McAvoy is present if they have
any questions for him.
Stephen Finch, Director of Golf at Kings Ridge Golf Course, 1950 Kings Ridge Blvd.,
(Representative for Respondent), stated the area is not operable at this time, and they are working
with the health inspectors, city staff in getting the proper permitting to get it up to code. He
explained they are currently working with engineers who will pull the proper permitting to get the
structure up to city code. He further expressed they have roped off the kitchen area and nothing in
the area is being used in any manner.
Chair May asked the fire inspector if the grills are currently a fire hazard. Fire Inspector McAvoy
explained the grills should be disconnected and put away for safety purposes.
Discussion ensued regarding the permitting process and bringing the structure into compliance.
Member Fornoles made a motion to find the Respondent is in violation in Case No. C2404-0035.-
and is ordered to correct the violation on or before Mai, 27. 2024. IfRespondent does not cowN
with this order, a fine of 5250 per day for every day in violation after Mav 27, 2024, will accrue
until corrected. The Respondent is ordered to contact the Code Enforcement Office to arrange an
inspection of the property to verih, compliance with the order. And further. the Board finds that
the violations present a serious threat to the public health, safety, and welfare: Seconded by Vice -
Chair Camps. Motion passed 7-0.
ITEM 20 — CASE NO. C2401-0029
Florida Property Shop Sales & Rentals, Inc.
101 E Hwy 50
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 1950 Kings Ridge Blvd
VIOLATION: Sec. 123-41 Maintenance and pruning, Sec. 117-22 Signs on Vehicles, Prohibition
of Storage of Certain Items
City Attorney Mantzaris introduced the case.
The Representative for Respondent was present and sworn in.
Officer Cortez explained the following violations: Sec. 123-41 Maintenance and Pruning, Sec.
117-22 Signs on Vehicles, Prohibition of storage of certain items. He stated this was an in-house
complaint by the code enforcement manager that is currently not in compliance. He detailed the
case summary and gave its history, read the violation, dates and exhibited pictures that are a true
7
Code Enforcement Board Meeting
May 20, 2024
and accurate depiction of the property on the dates taken. He further stated staff s recommendation,
and said the trailer with the expired tag has been removed from the property.
Respondent Sarah Gholami, The Florida Property Shop, 101 E. Highway 50, stated they have
planted bushes; however, half of the bushes are dead already due to the pollution from
Highway 50.
Discussion ensued regarding the approved landscape plan and the requirements to adhere to the
plan. Development Services Director Henschel explained the City's code requirements regarding
landscape plans.
Further discussion ensued regarding the next steps the respondent can take such as applying for a
variance, replant according to the current landscape plan, or applying for a new landscape plan.
Member Forth made a motion to lind the Respondent is in violation in Case No. C2401-0029: and
is ordered to correct the violation on or before Julv 19, 2024. #'Respondent does not comely with
this order, a fine of $250 per day for every day in violation after Julv 19. 2024. will accrue until
corrected. The Respondent is ordered to contact the Code Enforcement Office to arran-ee an
insvection of the r,,,ro_verty to verih compliance with the order: Seconded by Member Kilburn.
Motion passed 7-0.
ITEM 21— CASE NO. C2404-0012
Martin Ben H & Tammi J
3030 Santa Marcos Drive
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 3030 Santa Marcos Drive
VIOLATION: Sec. 18-25 Sound Measurement, Sec. 18-24 Maximum Permissible Sound Level
Limits
Officer Cortez introduced the case and explained the following violations: Sec. 18-25 Sound
Measurement, Sec. 18-24 Maximum Permissible Sound Level Limits. He stated this is a citizen -
driven complaint that is currently in compliance. He detailed the case summary and gave its
history, violation and dates, exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the property
on the dates taken, and played a short recording taken from the adjacent neighboring property
demonstrating the sound measurement of the wind chimes. This is the fourth noise complaint
received since 2022, and the second time the noise caused by the chimes was recorded over the
maximum limit. He further stated staff s recommendation.
Respondent Ben Martin, 3030 Santa Marcos Drive, stated he has taken the wind chimes down and
does not plan on putting them up again. He further stated he did not put them up to harass his
neighbors.
Neighbor Deborah Hubbard, 3043 Santa Marcus Drive, stated they have lived there for 15 years
and have been Mr. Martin's neighbors the entire time. She said as of tonight there are
approximately 30 wind chimes hanging on one tree located on the corner of the house which is
close to three of their bedrooms. She explained they have had many issues throughout the years
with the neighbors.
Code Enforcement Board Meeting
May 20, 2024
Member Kilburn made a motion to find the Respondent was in violation in Case No. C2404-0012;
however. the Respondent did correct the violation. The Respondent is ordered to refrain from
repeatine this violation. Ii Respondent repeats this violation. the Respondent may be broueht back
as a repeat violator; Seconded by Vice -Chair Camps. Motion Passed 7-0.
ITEM 22 — CASE NOs. C2404-0046, C2404-0048, C2404-0049 & C2404-0050
Lakefront Village LLC
905 Lakefront Village Drive
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 905, 915, 925 & 935 Lakefront Village Drive
VIOLATION: Sec. 125-522 General Development Conditions, Sec. 18-130 Accumulation of
Certain Materials
City Attorney Mantzaris introduced the case.
The Representative for Respondent was present and sworn in.
Officer Snodgrass explained the following violations: Sec. 125-522 General Development
Conditions, Sec. 18-130 Accumulation of Certain Materials. He stated this case is currently not in
compliance. He detailed the case summary and gave its history, violations and dates, exhibited
pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the property on the dates taken. He further stated
staff s recommendation.
Albert Bustamante, Esq., 20 S. Orange Ave., Orlando, (Representative for Respondent), stated he
has been working with Lakefront Village since they acquired the property. He stated the developer
has issues with the contractor. Once they received the violation notice, they started cleaning up the
site. It is their understanding the permits have expired, and the plans need to go back through the
site review process. He further stated 90 days is not enough time to go through the site review
process and requested 120 days.
City Attorney Mantzaris stated it is up to the board if they want to give them more time. Discussion
ensued regarding the site plan submission and permitting timelines.
John Howe, 920 Lakefront Village Drive (Representative for the Homeowners), stated they are
still waiting for a wall to be built behind the homes and the other homes to be built. He further
stated the homeowners would like to see the work concluded as soon as possible.
Member Forth made a motion to find the Respondent is in violation in Case Nos. C2404-0046,
C2404-0048. C2404-0049 & C2404-0050; and is ordered to correct the violation on or before
September 18. 2024 for the submittal and site review and obtainine, of the permit and also assess
a fine of $60 Per day for evert, dais that does not come into compliance. Further, assess a fine of
$60 per dai, for every dais after September 19, 2025. that the property, remains in construction one
near after the commencement of construction under a new buildinw Permit.
Board Attorney Brackins inquired if the City's recommendation changed withdrawing assessment
of fines relating to construction. City Attorney Mantzaris agreed.
After discussion. Member Kilburn seconded. Motion failed 7-0.
0
Code Enforcement Board Meeting
May 20, 2024
Vice -Chair Camps made a motion to find the Respondent is in violation in Case Nos. C2404-0046.
C2404-0048. C2404-0049 & C2404-0050: and is ordered to correct the violation on or before
September 18. 2024. If Respondent does not comph, with this order. a fine of $250 ver day for
evert} day in violation after September 18. 2024, will accrue until corrected. The Respondent is
ordered to contact the Code Enforcement Office to arranve an inspection ofthe vroperti� to veri&
compliance with the order: Seconded bi Member Fornoles. Motion passed 7-0.
(Recess was taken from 9:15 — 9: 22 pm)
ITEM 11— CASE NO. C2404-0022
Ray Dana
PO Box 878
Minneola, FL 34755
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 1144 West Desoto Street
VIOLATION: Sec. 18-54 Creation or Maintenance of Nuisance by Property Owner Declared
Unlawful, Sec. 18-53 Prohibited Items, Conditions or Actions Constituting Nuisances, IPMC Sec.
302.4 Weeds
City Attorney Brandt introduced the case.
The Respondent was not present. The Tenant was present and sworn in.
Officer Rebando explained the following violations: Sec. 18-54 Creation or Maintenance of
Nuisance by Property Owner Declared Unlawful, Sec. 18-53 Prohibited Items, Conditions or
Actions Constituting Nuisances, IPMC Sec. 302.4 Weeds. He detailed the case summary stating
the complaint was self -initiated and is currently in compliance. He presented its history, read the
violations and exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the property on the dates
taken. He further stated staff s recommendation.
Tenant Santos Rivera, 1144 W. Desoto Street, explained the circumstances surrounding this
violation, and stated he currently has a company scheduled to take care of the lawn.
Member Fornoles made a motion to find the Respondent was in violation in Case No. C2404-0022:
however, the Respondent did correct the violation. If the Respondent repeats the violation, the
Respondent mat- be brouzht back before the Code Enforcement Board as a repeat violator:.
Seconded by Vice -Chair Camps. Motion passed 7-0.
(Item 12 and Item 13 were heard together)
ITEM 12 — CASE NO. C2401-0007
Clermont Office Park Condo Association
5555 S. Kirkman Road, Suite 201
Orlando, FL 32819
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 17327 Pagonia Road
ITEM 13 — CASE NO. C2402-0062
Rio Dourado Investments LLC
7901 Kingspointe Pkwy, Suite 10
Orlando, FL 32819
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 17311 Pagonia Road
VIOLATION: Sec. 105-84 Required Soil Conversation Measures, IPMC Sec. 507.1 Storm
drainage
10
Code Enforcement Board Meeting
May 20, 2024
City Attorney Brandt introduced the case.
The Respondent was present and sworn in.
Officer Rebando explained the following violations: Sec. 105-84 Required Soil Conversation
Measures, IPMC Sec. 507.1 Storm drainage. He detailed the case summary stating the complaint
was self -initiated and the properties are currently not in compliance. He gave the history, violations
and dates, and exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the property on the dates
taken. He further stated staff's recommendation.
Bruce Myrick, 7749 Minnie Rouse Lane, Orlando, explained this is a bit of an unusual case and
detailed the circumstances surrounding the violations. He stated they have cleaned out the storm
drains a couple of times. He further explained silk fences will be going up tomorrow along with
other repairs. As soon as all of the issues are taken care of, he stated they will clean out the storm
drains once more. He further requested an extra 15 days to meet the deadline, because of the work
Duke Energy needs to complete. Discussion ensued surrounding the violations, the silk fences and
work timelines.
Vice -Chair Camps made a motion to find the Respondent is in violation in Case Nos. C2401-0007
and C2402-0062: and is ordered to correct the violations on or before June 30, 2024. If
Respondent does not comph, with this order. a fine of $250 per dat, for every day in violation after
June 30. 2024. will accrue until corrected. The Respondent is ordered to contact the Code
Enforcement Office to arrange an inspection of the nroperty to veri_f_v compliance with the order:
Seconded by Member Whitehead. Motion Passed 7-0.
ITEM 9 — CASE NO. C2401-0025
Tri Sky Properties LLC
100 Lincoln Road, Unit 301
Miami Beach, FL 33139
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 218 W. Magnolia Street
VIOLATION: Section 125-522 Building Permit Required, Section 18-92 Prohibition of Storage
of Certain Items, Section 110 Stop Work Order, Section 304.3 IPMC Premises Identification, Sec
125-522 General Development Conditions
City Attorney Brandt introduced the case.
The Respondent was not present.
Officer Rebando introduced the case explaining Section 125-522 Building Permit Required,
Section 18-92 Prohibition of Storage of Certain Items, Section 110 Stop Work Order, Section
304.3 IPMC Premises Identification, Sec. 125-522 General Development Conditions. He detailed
the case summary stating the complaint was self -initiated, and the property is currently not in
compliance. He gave the history, violations and dates, and exhibited pictures that are a true and
accurate depiction of the property on the dates taken. He further said the property has been cleaned
up, but no new work has been done, and he stated staffs recommendation.
Member Forth made a motion to find the Respondent is in violation. in Case No. C2401-0025: and
is ordered to correct the violations on or before June 19, 2024. If Respondent does not comD1V
with this order. a fine of S250 Per day for every day in. violation after June 19. 2024, will accrue
until corrected. The Respondent is ordered to contact the Code Enforcement Office to arrange an
inspection of the vropern, to veriA, compliance with the order.
11
Code Enforcement Board Meeting
May 20, 2024
Member Falcone asked for clarification on which violations are currently not in compliance.
After discussion. Seconded by Member Kilburn. Motion massed 7-0.
ITEM 10 — CASE NO. C2402-0018
Rios Felicita
1240 Winter Garden Vineland Road
Winter Garden, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 783 E. Juniata Street
VIOLATION: Sec. 125-522 General Development Conditions, Section 18-92 Prohibition of
Storage of Certain Items, Sec. 18-53 Prohibited Items, Conditions or Actions Constituting
Nuisances
City Attorney Brandt introduced the case.
The Respondent was not present.
Officer Rebando explained the following violations: Section 18-92 Prohibition of Storage of
Certain Items, Section 125-522 General Development Conditions, and Sec 18-53 Prohibited Items,
Conditions or Actions Constituting Nuisances. He detailed the case summary stating the complaint
was self -initiated, and the property is currently not in compliance. He gave the history, violations
and dates, and exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the property on the dates
taken. He stated staff s recommendation; and further, said the only violation not in compliance is
Section 18-92 Prohibition of Storage of Certain items.
Member Fornoles made a motion to find the Respondent is in violation in Case No. C2402-0018;
and is ordered to correct the violation on or before June 19. 2024. IfResvondent does not comply
with this order. a fine of'$250 per day for every day in violation after June 19. 2024. will accrue
until corrected. The Respondent is ordered to contact the Code Enforcement Office to arrange an
inspection of the properth to verih; compliance with the order; Seconded by Vice -Chair Camps.
Motion passed 7-0.
ITEM 6 — CASE NO. C2312-0028
FCH Properties LLC (Travel Camp)
4168 Southpoint Pkwy, Suite 201
Jacksonville, FL 32216
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 2480 South US Highway 27
VIOLATION: Sec 302.2 Grading & Drainage, Sec 125-522 (i) Property Maintenance, Sec 105-
120 Maintenance of Installed Systems, Sec 117-8 Prohibited Signs
City Attorney Brandt introduced the case.
The Respondent was not present.
Officer Cortez explained the following violations: Sec 302.2 Grading & Drainage, Sec 125-522 (i)
Property Maintenance, Sec 105-120 Maintenance of Installed Systems, Sec 117-8 Prohibited
Signs. He detailed the case summary stating the complaint was self -initiated, and the property is
currently not in compliance. He gave the history, violations and dates, and exhibited pictures that
are a true and accurate depiction of the property on the dates taken. He stated staff s
recommendation.
12
Code Enforcement Board Meeting
May 20, 2024
Member Kilburn made a motion to find the Respondent is in violation in Case No. C2312-0028:
and is ordered to correct the violations on or before June 19. 2024. If'Respondent does not comply
with this order. a fine of $250 Der day for ever, day in violation after June 19, 2024. will accrue
until corrected. The Respondent is ordered to contact the Code Enforcement Office to arrange an
inspection ofthe property to verih, compliance with the order: Seconded bi Member Forth. Motion
passed 7-0.
ITEM 15 — CASE NO. C2402-0057
FCH Properties LLC (Travel Camp)
4168 Southpoint Pkwy, Suite 201
Jacksonville, FL 32216
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 2480 South US Highway 27
VIOLATION: Sec. 125-522 General Development Conditions, IPMC 111.1.4 Unlawful
structure, IPMC 102.3 Application of Other Codes, FBC 105.4.1 Permit Intent, FBC 105.4.1.1,
FBC 105.4.1.2
City Attorney Brandt introduced the case.
The Respondent was not present.
Officer Cortez explained the following violations: Sec. 125-522 General Development Conditions,
IPMC 111.1.4 Unlawful structure, IPMC 102.3 Application of Other Codes, FBC 105.4.1 Permit
Intent, FBC 105.4.1.1, FBC 105.4.1.2. He detailed the case summary stating the complaint was
self -initiated, and the property is currently not in compliance. He gave the history, violations and
dates, and exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction of the property on the dates
taken. He stated staff s recommendation. Discussion ensued regarding the numerous permits that
were not renewed or finalized.
Vice -Chair Camps made a motion to find the Respondent is in violation in Case No. C2402-0057:
and is ordered to correct the violations on or betore June 19. 2024. IfRespondent does not comnli,
with this order. a fine of'$250 per day for every day in violation after June 19. 2024, will accrue
until corrected. The Respondent is ordered to contact the Code Enforcement Office to arrange an
inspection of the propery, to verifi? compliance with the order: Seconded by Member Whitehead.
Motion gassed 7-0.
ITEM 17 — CASE NO. C2307-0044
Annette Lockhart
447 E. Desoto St
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 447 E. Desoto Street
VIOLATION: IPMC 302.7 Accessory Structures, IPMC 304.7 Roofs and Drainage, IPMC 304.1
Exterior Structure, IPMC 304.1.1 Unsafe Conditions, IPMC 302.3 Sidewalks and Driveways,
IPMC 111.1.1 Unsafe Structure
City Attorney Brandt introduced the case.
The Respondent was not present.
Officer Cortez explained the following violations: IPMC 302.7 Accessory Structures, IPMC 304.7
Roofs and Drainage, IPMC 304.1 Exterior Structure, IPMC 304.1.1 Unsafe Conditions, IPMC
302.3 Sidewalks and Driveways, IPMC 111.1.1 Unsafe Structure. He detailed the case summary
and stated the complaint was self -initiated, and the property is currently not in compliance. He
gave its history, violations and dates and exhibited pictures that are a true and accurate depiction
13
Code Enforcement Board Meeting
May 20, 2024
of the property on the dates taken. He further stated staff s recommendation with an order that the
violations constitute a threat to the public health, safety and welfare.
Member Fornoles made a motion to find the Respondent is in violation in Case No. C2307-0044.
and is ordered to correct the violation on or before June 19, 2024. If Respondent does not comDh..
with this order, a line of'$250 i?er day for eves v day in violation after June 19, 2024, will accrue
until corrected. The Respondent is ordered to contact the Code Enforcement Office to arranze an
inspection ol-the vroverty to verili- compliance with the order. And further, the Board finds that
the violations present a serious threat to the public health, sa,fem and welfare; Seconded bti,
Member Whitehead. Motion i assed 7-0.
(The_following agenda items were not heard.)
ITEM 4 — CASE NO. C2207-0008
Turk Andrea Trustee
1326 East Ave.
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: West Avenue (AK 2668148) Vacant Lot
REQUEST: Reduction of Fine
Not heard due to the Respondent was not present.
ITEM 16 — CASE NO. C2401-0039
HWY 50 Clermont LLC
PO Box 17922
Tampa, FL 33682
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 158 West HWY 50
VIOLATION: 302.7 Accessory Structures, 102.5 Workmanship
Not heard due to the case coming into compliance.
ITEM 18 — CASE NO. C2402-0048
HEP-II-CLER2 LC
PO Box 120550
Clermont, FL 34711
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: Hartwood Marsh Rd (AK 3801640) (Vacant Lot)
VIOLATION: IPMC 308.1 Rubbish and Garbage
Not heard due to the case coming into compliance.
PUBLIC COMMENT - None
AJDOURN
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourn
Attest.
Ka ,y He• d, Recording Clerk
Jen
14