Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.24.2026 - City Council Minutes City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING March 24,2026 CALL TO ORDER The City Council met in a regular meeting on Tuesday, March 24, 2026, at 3:00 pm in the Clermont City Council Chambers. Mayor Murry called the meeting to order at 3:00 pm with the following Council Members present: Council Members Strange, Bain,Myers and Petersen. Other City officials present were City Manager Van Wagner,City Attorney Waugh, Deputy City Manager Matthys and City Clerk Howe. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Police Chaplain James Pagan gave the invocation, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. PROCLAMATION City Clerk Howe read the proclamation for Testicular Cancer Awareness Month. PUBLIC COMMENT Joe Fumasi, 2693 Jumping Jack Way — expressed concern that Wellness Ridge residents have unfairly funded major infrastructure benefiting other developments through Community Development District bonds and impact fee credits. He asked for a more equitable system for all developments to share the cost of growth. Paula Hoisington,564 E. Desoto Street—requested follow-up on prior questions regarding the process and public inclusion for city-sponsored trips. Expressed concerns about inconsistent standards in addressing council member behavior. Mike Cramer, 208 Nautica Mile Drive—opposed eliminating the Planning and Zoning Board, urging the council to improve it through feedback rather than replace it. Kurt Schuh,Clermont-encouraged the city to explore using Al to streamline processes like building permit approvals. Dennis Allard, 1792 Nature Cove Lane - expressed strong support and appreciation for law enforcement, fire rescue,and military personnel,emphasizing their service and sacrifice. He encouraged the community to show respect and gratitude. Mayor Murry asked for virtual comments. Jenny May,4062 Graystone Drive—opposed replacing the Planning and Zoning Commission with a special magistrate,emphasizing the value of volunteer service and community input. She requested clear feedback on any issues so the commission can improve rather than be eliminated. AGENDA CHANGES There were no changes to the agenda. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Murry advised the next item on the agenda for consideration was the Consent Agenda and requested anyone wishing to have any item pulled for discussion to please come forward at this time. 1 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING March 24,2026 Item No. 1 —Meeting Minutes Consider approval of the March 10, 2026, Council Meeting minutes. Item No. 2—Surplus Request Consider declaring end-of-life inventory as surplus from the departments of Environmental Services, Fire, Human Resources, Police, and Information Technology, and to provide disposal per the Procurement Policy. Item No.3—Board Appointments Consider appointing members to the Code Enforcement Board and Firefighters Pension Board of Trustees. Item No.4—Resolution No.2026-008R Consider authorization of grant application for Florida Boating Improvement Program matching funds in the amount of $300,000 towards the boat dock facility portion of the Meet Us in The Middle project. Item No.5—Bid Award Consider bid award and executing a contract with City Street Resurfacing S&L Materials, Inc. for resurfacing services (mill/overlay) on various roads in the budgeted amount of $668,653.51, and resurfacing Lakeshore Drive as an add-on in the budgeted amount of$160,255. Item No.6—Bid Award Consider awarding a Term Contract to Merrell Services for Water Reclamation Facility Bros.,Inc.to provide biosolids hauling,treatment and disposal. Item No.7—Piggyback Term Contract Consider approval to piggyback the City of Public Services Zephyrhills Term Contract No. 41-25-13 with RCM Utilities, LLC to provide installation services for underground infrastructure. Item No.8—Piggyback Term Contract Consider approval to piggyback the City of Water Meters Zephyrhills Term Contract No. 41-25-15 with National Metering Services, Inc., to provide meter replacement services. Item No.9-Piggyback Term Contract Consider piggyback approval of Interlocal Sewer System Improvements Purchasing System Term Contract 231102 with Vortex for sanitary sewer lining and related services. 2 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING March 24,2026 Item No. 10—Piggyback Term Contract Consider approval to piggyback Tohopekaliga Water Supply Wells and Pumps Maintenance Water Authority Term Contract No. IFB-25-004- 01 with A.C. Schultes of Florida, Inc. to provide well services and repairs. Item No. 11—Event Road Closure Request Consider road closure approval for the Anime Clermont Main Street Market events on April 25 and Sept 12,2026. Item No. 12-Event Road Closure Request Consider road closure approval for HER MARZ Event Mgmt. Radiance Rising Fest on Saturday, April 25, 2026. Council Member Strange pulled Consent Agenda Item 4. Council Member Petersen motioned to approve Consent Agenda items 1-12 excluding it 4. Seconded by Council Member Myers. The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing aye. Item No.4—Resolution No.2026-008R,Florida Boating Improvement Program Council Member Strange stated she pulled the item due to her opposition. Mayor Murry opened public comments.There were no comments.Mayor Murry closed public comments. Council Member Bain motioned to approve Consent Agenda item 4 Seconded by Council Member Myers. The motion passed 3-2 with Council Member Strange and Council Member Petersen opposed. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Item No. 13—Ordinance No. 2026-013, Certified Recovery Residences Final AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 125, TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF RECOVERY RESIDENCES PURSUANT TO AMENDED SECTION 397.487, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT, SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION, ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER'S ERRORS,PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE. City Clerk Howe read the ordinance title aloud. Development Services Planner Kruse presented the item. City staff proposed an amendment to the Land Development Codes in order to align with new state laws regarding the review and approval processes for certified recovery residences. The law requires local governments in the State of Florida to formalize and streamline the review and approval process for applicants seeking reasonable accommodation from local land use regulations to establish certified recovery residences. 3 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING March 24,2026 If the amendment is approved, a new article under Chapter 125 of the City's Land Development Codes, entitled Zoning, would be created specifically for certified recovery residences to ensure consistency with the requirements in Section 397.487,Florida Statutes.The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval,6-0. Staff recommended approval of Ordinance No. 2026-013. Mayor Murry opened the public hearing.There were no comments.Mayor Murry closed the public hearing. Council Member Strange stated that she opposed the item at the first reading and remains opposed, citing concerns about state overreach and the city not being equipped to provide the required level of service. Council Member Strange motioned to approve item 13. Seconded by Council Member Myers. Council Member Myers asked if the ordinance must be approved. City Attorney Waugh responded that the council does not have to approve this exact ordinance,but state law requires passing a similar measure to allow recovery residences,and it must be done promptly. Council Member Myers asked Council Member Strange what changes she would suggest.Council Member Strange expressed concerns about enforceability, questioning whether the city can effectively oversee recovery residences' operations,rules, staffing,and clinical services,and stated she could only support the ordinance if the language is broad enough to address these issues. City Attorney Waugh explained that the ordinance relies on certification by the Florida Department of Children and Families (DCF), so the city does not need to perform its own compliance checks and would not be held liable if the DCF fails to enforce requirements. He also noted that state law limits local control over recovery residences,allowing them to operate despite local opposition as part of a broader legislative effort to ensure these facilities can exist. Council Member Strange asked if the city could designate approved areas or include a clawback to revert zoning if a recovery residence fails to meet standards,such as excessive police calls.City Attorney Waugh responded that conditions of approval can be set and revoked if violated, including certification requirements, and certain provisions like the 180-day rule can be adjusted. He added that the city is not responsible for actively monitoring these standards,as oversight is handled by the credentialing entity,the Florida Department of Children and Families,though staff could be assigned to check on certain concerns. Council discussed adding conditions to recovery residence approvals, including revocation for arrests, limiting residents per home, and addressing financial or administrative burdens on the city. City Attorney Waugh explained that oversight primarily falls to the state, but the council can provide guidance on interpreting criteria, set reasonable conditions, and enforce revocation if standards, such as nuisance violations or excessive residents, are not met. Adjustments can be made later if the rules prove ineffective. Council Member Bain suggested adopting a temporary one-year ordinance,allowing time for feedback and adjustments while ensuring the city complies with state requirements promptly. 4 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING March 24,2026 Council Member Strange amended her motion to approve Ordinance 2026-013 with the following amendments; adding a subsection 11 under section 125-626A that allows city staff to rely solely on the representations of DCF and determining the applicability of this ordinance on a particular situation,amending section 125-627 to amend subsection B to be 30 days rather than 180 days, to add a subsection C to include violation of our existing nuisance statute,add subsection D to prohibit on street or off driveway parking and to add to section 7 a one year sunset to the ordinance. Seconded by Council Member Myers. City Attorney Waugh noted that Council cannot set a rule that applies to just one community; any parking regulations must be consistent citywide.He advised removing the on-street/off-driveway provision to avoid conflicts with existing residential parking rules. Council Member Bain stated he would not support approving the ordinance with the proposed amendments without sufficient time to review them and suggested either tabling the item or moving forward with it as- is with a sunset date to allow for further review. Council Member Strange amended her motion to approve Ordinance 2026-013 with the followine amendments, adding a subsection 11 under section 125-626A that allows city staff to rely solely on the representations of DCF and determiningthe he applicability of this ordinance on a particular situation,amending section 125-627 to amend subsection B to be 30 days rather than 180 days, to add a subsection C to include violation of our existing nuisance statute, and to add to section 7 a one year sunset to the ordinance Seconded by Council Member Myers. The motion passed by roll call 4-1 with Council Member Bain opposed. NEW BUSINESS Item No. 14—Resolution No. 2025-037R, 7-11 Wellness Way CUP A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY,FLORIDA,GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR A CONVENIENCE STORE, GAS STATION, AND CARWASH TO BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE WELLNESS WAY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT, SEVERABILITY, ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENERS ERROR,PUBLICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. City Clerk Howe read the title aloud. Development Services Planner Kruse presented the item. The applicant, V3 Capital Group, requested a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a convenience store and gas station as the primary use and an ancillary carwash use.The subject parcel,approximately 6.69 acres,is located at the southeast corner of the Wellness Way and Schofield Road intersection. The property is governed under the Wellness Ridge Planned Unit Development(PUD), Ordinance No. 2019-06. The request would encompass the entirety of the subject parcel with the future intent to split off the proposed convenience store, gas station, and carwash during the final site plan approval. The proposed use will be located on the west side of the subject parcel. 5 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING March 24,2026 The proposed site is within the Wellness Way Neighborhood Center Land Use that is designated for C-1 Light Commercial uses that complement the adjacent residential uses.Convenience stores and gas stations are a conditional use under the C-1 Light Commercial use. Carwashes are not permitted as a conditional use under the C-1 Light Commercial District and are specifically prohibited by Ordinance No. 2019-06. A review of the current convenience store and gas station locations within the city indicates that the majority of them are located along an arterial roadway, such as US Highway 27 or State Road 50, and they are located within the C-2 General Commercial zoning. In addition, a review of carwash locations indicates they are also located along arterial roadways, such as US Highway 27 or State Road 50. All these uses are auto dependent and are more desirable along roadways with higher levels of service. The Neighborhood Center is more suited for walkability from the nearby residences that provides a variety of services that are less intense and dependent on vehicles. The city adopted Wellness Design Standards in 2022, a set of form-based codes. While the original PUD was adopted prior to these standards, the applicant's request for a conditional use permit can be subjected to these standards. The proposed project does not meet several of the design standards. One such standard is 2.3.2 that requires buildings on corner parcels to be located up to and address the corner.Another standard is Table 2.2.2 that does not permit these uses in the Neighborhood District.The proposed convenience store, gas station,and carwash would be more appropriate in the Multi-Use District that fronts US Highway 27. When evaluating a request for a Conditional Use Permit, the Land Development Code, Section 101-212, requires specific development standards that are required to be met. Staff have reviewed the application as submitted in accordance with the development criteria and find the proposed use conflicts with PUD Ordinance No. 2019-06, the Land Development regulations for C-1 Light Commercial, and the Wellness Way Design Standards. The proposed use is not considered desirable at this particular location since there are several standards within the Wellness Way Design Standards and the City's Comprehensive Plan for the Neighborhood District that are in conflict. In addition, the character and type of development at this location is auto dependent and does not reinforce the Neighborhood District's walkability for uses with the adjoining residential neighborhood. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial, 5-0 at the October 7, 2025, meeting. Following that meeting, the applicant requested a continuance to their application to address questions brought up by the Planning and Zoning Commission.The applicant made changes to the proposed plan and provided the updated concept plan to staff for review. Staff found the changes to be minor and included an increased landscape buffer on the south side of the property,the car wash was relocated to the east side of the project,and adjustments to the proposed access from Wellness Way were noted. It was determined by staff that the changes were non-substantial. Staff have reviewed the updated plan and staffs recommendation of denial still stands based upon the analysis below. The primary issue is that the proposed use is not considered desirable at this location, since there are several standards within the Wellness Way Design Standards and the City's Comprehensive Plan for the Neighborhood District that are in conflict. Staff recommended denial of the Conditional Use Permit,Resolution No.2025-037R. Trey Vic,CEO of V3 Capital Group, summarized updates to their project,highlighting that changes to the site plan were intentional to address community concerns. 6 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING March 24,2026 He noted that the landscape buffer between the development and residential areas was increased from the required 15 to 25 feet to 175 feet, car wash orientation was adjusted to minimize noise and light impacts, and fuel-related infrastructure was positioned farthest from homes.He emphasized maintaining pedestrian connectivity,buffering,and responsiveness to resident feedback throughout the planning process. Mayor Murry opened public comment. Matthews Morgan, 2671 Runners Circle — opposed the proposed 7-Eleven, citing safety, noise, traffic, environmental risks,and property value impact,urging the council to deny it. Luan,2659 Runners Circle—opposed the 7-Eleven behind his home,citing traffic,noise, safety risks,and disruption to neighborhood peace. Valerie Schuett, 931 W. Montrose Street—urged the council to deny the project, emphasizing that it fails to meet residents' expectations for responsible development. Joe Fumasi, 2693 Jumping Jack Way — opposed the proposed 7-Eleven, citing traffic, location near residential areas,and lack of neighborhood benefit,urging the council to follow staff's recommendation to deny it. Vincent Niemiec, Regency Hills—opposed the proposed 7-Eleven, citing concerns about proximity to the road,headlights, noise,and environmental impacts. Michael Curtis, 2725 Runners Circle—opposed the 7-Eleven, citing safety concerns for children, tanker traffic, and the incompatibility of a 24-hour convenience store with the neighborhood's wellness-focused character. Caroline Baldin, 2659 Runners Circle -opposed the 24/7 7-Eleven, citing impacts on her family's safety, peace, health, and quality of life, and urged development that aligns with the neighborhood and respects residents. Vicarose Llave, 6045 Shavasana Road - urged denial of the gas station, citing safety risks, traffic, and noncompliance with neighborhood standards. Mayor Murry asked for virtual comments. Nicole Parker, 2677 Runners Circle — requested the council deny the gas station, highlighting concerns about its effect on her family's backyard enjoyment, neighborhood character, and overall community wellness. Anna Sinclair, 575 W. Minneola Avenue—opposed the request stating the gas station and car wash do not meet the Wellness Way code or represent an exceptional development. Mayor Murry closed public comment. Council Member Strange questioned the developer's decision to pursue the project despite prior guidance that it did not align with community standards,suggesting the time could have been spent on a development residents want. 7 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 2026 Mr. Vic stated that the project complies with the existing Planned Unit Development, which predates current Wellness Way standards, and that the Conditional Use Permit process allows the city to apply additional conditions. He emphasized efforts to address community concerns through design changes, noting the site has always been designated for commercial use and that alternative developments could be more intensive if the project is denied. Council discussed the compatibility of the proposed gas station with the community's vision, emphasizing residents' desire for walkable, neighborhood-oriented uses rather than a vehicular-focused development. Concerns were raised about safety, environmental impacts, and lack of community support, while the developer defended the project's compliance with existing zoning and modern environmental standards. Council Member Bain motioned to approve Resolution No. 2025-037R Seconded by Council Member Strange. The motion failed 0-5 Council Member Strange Council Member Bain, Mayor Murry, Council Member Mvers and Council Member Petersen opposed. Item No. 15—Resolution No.2026-005R, CUP Amendment A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, GRANTING AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, RESOLUTION 2012-21, RESOLUTION 2022-003R AND RESOLUTION 2023-011 R TO INCLUDE THE EXPANSION OF SEATING AREA WITHIN THE PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT, SEVERABILITY, ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENERS ERROR, PUBLICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. City Clerk Howe read the title aloud. Development Services Planner Gonzalez presented the item.The applicant,Jimmy Crawford,is requesting a Conditional Use Permit(CUP)amendment to revise the site plan in Resolution No.2023-011 R to include the expansion of the restaurant deck and an additional outdoor seating area on the north side of the Salt Shack on the Lake restaurant, located in the Central Business District (CBD). The property is located at 846 West Osceola Street, formerly known as Lily's on the Lake. The proposed amendment includes an enlarged deck footprint,32 feet deep by 78 feet long,and the addition of new outdoor seating to accommodate increased dining capacity. With the addition of seating, staff has included an updated condition in the revised resolution requiring that any additional parking demand generated by the expanded seating area be satisfied through payment into the City's Parking Fund, as allowed under 115-14 of the Land Development Code.This payment must be made prior to approval of the Site Review application. The current cost per space in the parking fund is $3,000, as approved by City Council. If this is increased prior to the time of site plan approval,then the applicant would be responsible for paying the new fee. Based upon the anticipated additional seating of 104 seats,the parking requirements would be one space for every 8 seats. This would equate to 13 spaces and a payment of$39,000 into the parking fund at the current rate. The project does not require approval from the City regarding lakefront impacts.The applicant has already secured permit approval for the proposed improvements from the St. Johns River Water Management District(SJRWMD). 8 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 2026 The CUP amendment does not alter the approved use but modifies the configuration of the outdoor dining area to improve functionality and enhance customer experience. All other conditions of Resolution No. 2023-011 R remain in effect. The proposed increase in seating does not appear to be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding community. The city did receive a noise complaint in May of 2024. An investigation was conducted and it found that the sound was a result of the mechanical equipment at the site. Sound compression blankets were installed on the exhaust fans and Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) equipment in July of 2024. This reduced the sound decibels to be well below the City's sound decibel limits,and no further complaints have been received. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-1) of Resolution No. 2026-005R, with three additions: (1)the applicant shall meet with DPZ to obtain recommendations,(2)Lake County Water Authority is included regarding possible shoreline alterations, and (3) installing additional waterfront signage to discourage boats from mooring near the vegetation along to the property's shoreline. There was an email from Nathan Norris, Economic Development Director,who reviewed the project with DPZ. Their only recommendation was to allow for a future waterfront connection by providing the city with a 15-foot easement beyond the proposed deck. This would allow the city, if desired, to construct a boardwalk that would not interfere with views from Salt Shack and could potentially include space for boat mooring.This recommendation has been forwarded to the applicant. The second recommendation from the Planning & Zoning Board was to include the Lake County Water Authority; the applicant indicated this would be addressed during the interim period. Lastly, language has been added to the resolution to include additional signage along the shoreline. Staff recommends approval of Resolution 2026-005R-CUP Amendment for Salt Shack on the Lake. Attorney Jimmy Crawford, representing the property owner and applicant for Salt Shack, presented a request to amend the existing Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for deck expansion. He explained that while no change in use is proposed,an amendment is necessary because the original 2023 CUP included a concept plan that did not reflect the expanded deck. Mr. Crawford noted that the project had already received permitting approval from the St.Johns River Water Management District after an extensive review process, confirming that the work does not constitute shoreline alteration. He emphasized that significant stormwater improvements are required as part of the permit, including French drains and a system that directs runoff to Victory Point for treatment, resulting in improved water quality protections compared to existing conditions. Mr.Crawford stated that the applicant agrees with the Planning and Zoning Board and staff-recommended conditions, including coordination on a public connection, with minor considerations related to maintenance and security.He clarified that the Lake County Water Authority does not regulate or comment on zoning matters, deferring instead to the Water Management District. He highlighted Salt Shack's positive track record over the past three years as a local employer with approximately 100 employees,most of whom live in the area, and described the project as supporting both environmental stewardship and economic sustainability. He added that the expansion would improve operational efficiency without increasing staffing levels and would help ensure the restaurant's long-term viability. Mr. Crawford concluded by emphasizing the importance of the site as one of the last significant private waterfront parcels in downtown Clermont and requested Council's support for the amendment. 9 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING March 24,2026 Mayor Murry opened public comments. Dan Wyatt, 1108 Peregrine Street-supported the Salt Shack expansion,citing its value as a local business and stating the request is an easy approval. Steve Green, 18710 Downway Road—supported the expansion,citing strong management and noting added seating would reduce wait times and parking strain. Mayor Murry closed public comments. Council discussion focused on stormwater and environmental impacts of the proposed deck,with engineer Jeff Banker explaining that although the deck allows some water to pass through to the sand,it is treated as impervious under permitting rules and offset through stormwater capacity at Victory Point.Council raised concerns about runoff, food, and debris potentially reaching the lake. Chief Operating Officer Katherine Herr confirmed regular cleaning practices and agreed to consider formal conditions for ongoing beach and under-deck maintenance. Council discussed the proposed public access easement and waterfront pathway, with Mr. Crawford confirming willingness to accommodate a boardwalk or improved pedestrian connection while noting details such as security and hours of operation would need to be resolved. It was clarified the deck would not extend to the ordinary high-water line and complies with setback requirements,and Council expressed appreciation for the applicant's cooperation,continued quality operations,and commitment to maintenance and security,while noting the project's broader benefit to the downtown waterfront. Council Member Strange motioned to approve Resolution No 2026-005R with the amendments that the owner grant the city a 15 foot easement for a boardwalk with the specific terms to be determined, install additional waterfront signage to discourage boats from mooring along the shoreline and ensure that the property in and around the deck is maintained in such a manner as to protect the pristine waterway status of Lake Minneola to include beach cleaning not less than two times daily. Seconded by Council Member Myers. The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing aye Mayor Murry recessed the meeting at 5:03pm. Mayor Murry reconvened the meeting at 5:18pm. Item No. 16—Ordinance No. 2026-011,Amend Community Development District Intro AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE 2022-018 TO EXPAND AND CONTRACT THE BOUNDARIES OF THE WELLNESS RIDGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA; DESCRIBING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND TO BE REMOVED AND ADDED FROM THE WELLNESS RIDGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND DESCRIBING THE NEW EXTERNAL BOUNDARY OF THE WELLNESS RIDGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AFTER EXPANSION AND CONTRACTION; PROVIDING FOR ALL OTHER CONDITIONS TO REMAIN UNCHANGED; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND REPEAL; PROVIDING FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENERS ERROR; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR RECORDING. 10 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING March 24,2026 City Clerk Howe read the title aloud. Mayor Murry opened the public hearing. Joe Fumasi, 2693 Jumping Jack Way - opposed the proposed district expansion, arguing that the petition underestimates true costs, lacks sufficient supporting documentation for major infrastructure and maintenance expenses, and that rising district budgets and large projected increases should be more thoroughly evaluated before proceeding. Jen Carpenter,Counsel for the Community Development District-explained that this is a first reading of a petition to expand and slightly contract the Community Development District (CDD), with the formal petition and full public hearing scheduled for April 14 in accordance with Florida Statutes; she outlined that CDDs are special-purpose governments subject to statutory, financial, and transparency requirements including public budgeting, independent annual audits, and statutory petition criteria, including maps and cost estimates, noted the district has been operating since 2022 with clean audits and no issues, and stated the proposed expansion connects to new development while the team and staff are available to answer questions and provide further information before the next hearing. Michael Curtis, 2725 Runners Circle — requested more clarity on the Community Development District proposal, expressing concern and surprise about the extent of responsibility and costs associated with the development. Mayor Murry closed the public hearing. Council Member Strange raised two questions regarding the Community Development District (CDD): why the district is being expanded rather than maintaining existing boundaries,and concerns from residents about fairness in fees and whether developers benefit from impact fee credits funded by citizens. Ms. Carpenter explained that the expansion supports economies of scale by combining administration and maintenance for connected developments, which can help lower or stabilize assessments while providing efficiencies through a single CDD structure with public oversight, and clarified that the CDD is funded through tax-exempt bonds with strict legal oversight ensuring improvements financed by residents do not generate impact fee returns to the district, as any developer funding beyond CDD capacity is separate and carefully reviewed to avoid improper financial benefit. Mark McDonald, Lennar Homes explained that the Community Development District (CDD) funds and maintains community infrastructure and amenities not covered by city or county taxes, such as parks, landscaping,stormwater systems,common areas,and a 10-acre amenity site,while also maintaining certain roads and buffers, with most offsite improvements like major roads and utility extensions paid for by the developer and offset through impact fee credits rather than CDD funds; he further explained that CDD costs, including debt and operations and maintenance, are funded through assessments that are placed on individual property tax bills and collected by the tax collector each year,meaning as new homes are platted and added to assessment areas,more tax bills are generated to fund the district,with both homeowners and the developer, for unsold lots,paying these annual assessments to fully support the CDD's budget. 11 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 2026 Mayor Murry stated he had requested detailed information about the CDD to better understand its structure, finances, and operations and to better address ongoing questions and concerns. Mark McDonald reiterated that the CDD is a legally structured district under Florida Statute with phased development, where infrastructure, operations, and debt are funded through property-based assessments collected via tax bills, and noted that as new homes are added, assessments increase and are collected by the tax collector to support the district's budget.He also highlighted that governance is designed to transition to residents over time,with some board seats becoming available for homeowner election after six years and additional seats after eight years,while Homeowners Association control is turned over earlier,around 90 percent buildout, ensuring residents gradually gain control as development progresses. Council discussed the importance of transparency and understanding the scale of the project, spanning hundreds of acres and nearly 700 additional homes, while expressing interest in ensuring residents can eventually govern the community themselves and suggesting further meetings once all requested information is provided. Council Member Strange asked whether the CDD provides or manages core services such as water,sewer, sidewalks, or public parks, and was informed by Mr. McDonald that currently it does not operate public utilities, as water and sewer services are owned and managed by the City of Clermont; however, it was explained that the CDD is involved in a limited capacity with infrastructure such as an irrigation system, which uses onsite wells but cannot be activated until an interlocal agreement with the city is approved, authorizing the CDD to operate irrigation only, and that this agreement is part of the upcoming April 14 review. The discussion further clarified that while questions raised largely related to budget and financial understanding rather than the petition itself, no material changes were identified that would require currently amending the ordinance, and that all parties agreed the matter could proceed with continued review and understanding prior to the final hearing. Council Member Strange Motioned to introduce Ordinance No 2026-011 Seconded by Council Member Myers.The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing aye Item No. 17—Bid Award,Construction of Fire Station 2 Procurement Director Suarez presented Item 17, recommending award of a bid to the lowest qualified, responsive, and responsible bidder, Mulligan Constructors Inc., for Fire Station 2 in the amount of $2,975,290, with an estimated construction timeline of approximately 300 days, about 10 months, from issuance, and noted that Fire Chief Ezell and a representative from Mulligan Constructors Inc. were available to answer any questions related to procurement and construction. Mayor Murry opened public comments. There were no comments. Mayor Murry closed public comments. Council Member Strange spoke about funding, scheduling, and payment structure for the proposed Fire Station project under the bid awarded to Mulligan Constructors Inc. for approximately $2.975 million. Jason Mulligan,Mulligan Constructors Inc.explained that construction is expected to take about 10 months, with permitting likely taking around 90 days and work spanning two fiscal years, and that payments will be made on a monthly,percentage-of-completion basis as work is performed and billed,with the contractor estimating roughly 35 percent of the total cost would be incurred in the current fiscal year and the remainder in the following year. 12 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING March 24,2026 Council Member Strange stated that $900,000 had previously been set aside in general fund reserves for Fire Station funding and proposed using those funds in the upcoming fiscal year while relying on approximately $5.5 million in available fire impact fees for the balance and suggested developing a five- year capital and funding plan to align impact fees,grants,and other revenues with future fire station needs. Mayor Murry explained that because the project is a renovation, it may not qualify for impact fee funding and should primarily be paid from the general fund, while suggesting staff verify eligibility and ensure compliance. City Attorney Waugh added that while simple renovation work would not qualify,portions of the project tied to growth or expansion may be eligible for impact fee use, meaning funding may need to be split between general funds and impact fees based on what qualifies. Council discussion focused on discrepancies between reported fire impact fee fund balances, with it being clarified that while the current fiscal year budget shows about $1.049 million available, the total fund balance is approximately $5.4 million when considering overall funds, projected revenues, and prior commitments, with further discussion comparing current year available and total fund balance. Fire Chief Ezell and City Manager Van Wagner explained that despite earmarked projects, savings and projected collections would keep the fund in a positive position, while council emphasized the need for clearer financial information for long-term planning and more informed decision-making. Council also discussed broader fund availability,including significant general fund reserves,and expressed a desire to use available resources strategically,for public safety,while requesting staff develop a five-year financial plan. Council Member Strange motioned to approve Item No 17 the Bid Award for construction at Fire Station 2 with a budget amendment to come back for $900 000 from the eg_neral fund reserves and instruction to staff to have a 5-year plan for the remainder of the funds brought to council by July 1. 2026. Seconded by Council Member Petersen The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing aye. Item No. 18-Council Member Request Mayor Murry proposed transitioning City Council terms from two years to four years to improve continuity, allow more time to complete long-term projects, and reduce the need for annual elections,which he noted would also lower election costs. He outlined a phased transition with a potential reset of term limits to maintain an eight-year maximum and requested that the City Manager and City Attorney draft the necessary language for consideration by voters, emphasizing that the change would ultimately require resident approval. Mayor Murry opened public comments. Valerie Schuett,931 W.Montrose Street—expressed support for four-year council terms to reduce constant turnover and election related distractions,while advocating for a strict eight-year term limit without a reset despite acknowledging potential transitional challenges. Otis Taylor, 3686 Caladesi Road — supported extending council terms to four years, stating it would improve council cohesion and decision-making, allow members more time to complete and see projects through,and reduce election-related distractions and costs. 13 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 2026 Jenny May, 4062 Greystone Drive — supported four-year terms but opposed any reset of term limits, emphasizing that the decision rests with residents and that an eight-year cap should remain firm to prevent consolidation of power. Fran Falcone, 3904 Doune Way—expressed support for four-year council terms with no reset, stating that two-year terms are too short to be productive since the first year is largely spent learning. Paula Hoisington, 564 E. Desoto Street — supported four-year terms with no reset and urged public education,while suggesting reconsidering the meeting time for better accessibility. Vincent Niemiec,Regency Hills—opposed four-year terms,arguing they could increase government power, reduce public control,and are unnecessary if officials are accountable and perform well. Mayor Murry asked for virtual comments. Anna Sinclair, 575 W. Minneola Avenue— supported four-year terms for stability but opposed any reset and emphasized a fair transition accounting for time served. Mayor Murry closed the public comments. Mayor Murry recessed the meeting at 6:44pm. Mayor Murry reconvened the meeting at 6:55pm. Council Member Bain asked about the charter review process, with City Attorney Waugh noting there is no statutory requirement or standard practice,and that changes to term length and term limits would require charter amendments and could be combined into one ballot question with clear language. Council debated whether to adopt four-year terms and structure term limits,including whether to include a reset,with differing views on impacts to accountability,voter control,continuity,and transition for current members. There was consensus that if a proposal were to be on the ballot it should be clearly presented to voters,with some members emphasizing that the decision should be based on the city's best interests rather than individual positions, while others supported keeping two-year terms to maintain frequent accountability and voter input, and others supported four-year terms for stability, continuity, and reduced election costs. Council Member Bain motioned to place on the ballot 4-year terms with no reset Seconded by Council Member Strange to call the vote. Council Member Bain clarified that the proposal is to move to four-year terms with a maximum of two consecutive four-year terms, without changing any other charter language, only adjusting the term length from two years to four years while keeping all other provisions the same. The motion failed 2-3 with Council Member Strange Council Member Myers and Council Member Petersen opposed. REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT City Manager Van Wagner— • There will be a Public Safety facility tour on March 25. • Pig on the Pond at Waterfront Park March 27-29 14 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 2026 • Lake County Boating Regatta this weekend. • Masters Point Disc Golf Tournament at Lake Hiawatha on March 28. Finance Director Scott Borror reported that the Fiscal Year 2025 audit is nearing completion, with the auditor scheduled to present in April and completion expected by the end of March,well ahead of the state deadline.He also announced that the city received the Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for the Fiscal Year 2024 audit, the first such recognition since 2020, crediting the achievement to the finance team,external partners, city departments, and past and current leadership. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT City Attorney Waugh— • Working with Finance on presenting an investment policy in April. • Consummating purchase of 8 acres,Phase 1 survey is in progress. • Conducting a comprehensive review of Code Enforcement procedures regarding nuisances. CITY COUNCIL REPORT Council Member Bain— • Will be hosting a 51 Tuesday forum, community wide listening session on March 31 at 6:OOpm at the Arts and Recreation Center. Council Member Myers— • Suggested the City host a candidate forum with standardized questions. • Suggested exploring a#919 call system to connect residents to city services and information, with a free trial followed by a potential monthly cost. • Highlighted Deputy City Clerk Wisniewski for International Women's Month. Council Member Petersen— • Praised the Arts and Recreation Center for its increasingly high-quality shows and strong marketing,highlighting it as a valuable community asset drawing visitors to Clermont. • In agreement with hosting a candidate forum. Council Member Strange— • Spoke about little league baseball, softball and soccer starting this season. Deputy City Manager Matthys— • Requested that Council respond to an email from True North to schedule a brief in-person or Zoom meeting to provide input for the city's social media assessment. City Manager Van Wagner requested consensus on the suggestions brought forth by Council Member Myers. 15 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING March 24,2026 Council Member Strange supported community forums and suggested exploring the#919 style call system as a communication tool,noting that any initiative improving public communication is beneficial. Council Member Bain supported exploring a call/text service for easy reporting of city issues but raised concerns about procurement requirements and suggested further workshop discussion and expressed support for community forums while recommending they be hosted by an outside organization rather than the City. Mayor Murry expressed concern about the city sponsoring candidate forums to maintain neutrality, preferred outside organizations hosting such events, and requested further review of the proposed #919 style service and existing communication tools before consideration. Mayor Murry— • Asked staff to explain the process and public inclusion for city-sponsored trips. City Manager Van Wagner clarified that the trip in question was originally intended for staff, but due to various scheduling conflicts and absences, participation was expanded, and while communication to Council may not have been entirely clear, efforts were made to include community members and downtown/Main Street stakeholders to help better understand the DPZ process. He noted that the subsequent workshops and discussions provided valuable insight. He emphasized that he operates in the direction of City Council and appreciated the opportunity to address concerns,expressing a desire to resolve the matter without further conflict. He also acknowledged concerns about potential additional costs and stated a cautious approach regarding spending, while remaining open to further discussion and future involvement. He concluded by expressing appreciation for candid feedback and offering to continue the conversation offline. Council Member Strange stated that the concerns raised are valid and highlight a lack of clear policy regarding travel,trip approval,and use of the transportation and training budget,which is currently executed by the City Manager without defined guidelines on who may attend or which trips are permitted. She recommended addressing this during the budget process by establishing clearer policies and expectations to improve transparency and reduce confusion. She also requested that a previously prepared report on the trip expenses and participation be shared for review. • Mayor's luncheon on April 1 at Piesano's at 12:OOpm. • Attending the Women's Club on April 7 at 12:OOpm. • Spoke about his concerns with the Planning and Zoning Commission Board performance and conduct, noted difficulty filling vacancies and maintaining objectivity, emphasized need for training and proper representation. • Spoke about endorsements for candidates for City Council. 16 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 2026 ADJOURN: With no further comments,this meeting adjourned at 7:50 pm. r• APPROVED: Tim Murry, Mayor AT S Tracy Ackroyd Howe,MMC City Clerk 17