HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance No. 2026-001 CL NT CITY OF CLERMONT
a-f ORDINANCE NO. 2026-001
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY,
FLORIDA AMENDING CODE OF ORDINANCES CHAPTER 2,
"ADMINISTRATION" ARTICLE VI, "FINANCIAL MATTERS"
DIVISION 2 "IMPACT FEES"; AMENDING SECTION 2-264 "IMPACT
FEE SCHEDULE" PROVIDING FOR A NEW IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE
ADJUSTING AND REDUCING IMPACT FEES FOR ACCESSORY
DWELLING UNITS; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDINANCE TO THE
EXTENT OF SUCH CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT,
SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION, THE ADMINISTRATIVE
CORRECTION OF SCRIVENERS ERROR, PUBLICATION AND AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Clermont is committed to promoting affordable housing options
and supporting the development of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) as a viable means to
increase housing availability in the community; and
WHEREAS, the State of Florida has recognized the importance of ADUs in addressing
housing needs and have implemented policies to facilitate their construction as a strategy to create
affordable housing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of Clermont has determined that impact fees currently
imposed on ADUs are disproportionately high relative to the scale and impact of such units
compared to larger residential properties and wishes to reduce the impact fee rate for ADUs, in
order to better support the development of ADUs as an affordable housing solution; and
WHEREAS, such an amendment would align with the City's goal of encouraging the
construction of ADUs while maintaining the integrity of the overall impact fee system, ensuring
the continued provision of necessary infrastructure and services throughout the City of Clermont.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Clermont,
Florida, as follows:
SECTION 1:
The above recitals are incorporated herein by reference and form an integral part of the Ordinance.
SECTION 2:
The City of Clermont Code of Ordinances Chapter 2, "Administration," Article VI, "Financial
Matters,"Division 2, "Impact Fees," Section 2-264 "Impact Fees Schedule" is hereby amended to
read as follows: (note strikethrough indicates removed words and underlined indicates added)
Sec. 2-264. - Impact fee schedule.
C� NT CITY OF CLERMONT
Cd ORDINANCE NO. 2026-001
(a) The council hereby adopts and incorporates by reference the Utility and Municipal
Impact Fee Study, dated May 5, 2023, and the fee schedule incorporated therein, a copy of which
is attached hereto and incorporated herein as appendix A and is available from the city clerk.
(b) If a development approval is requested for a development with mixed unit type, then
the fee shall be computed by calculating the number of units of each type and multiplying the
results by the appropriate fees on the schedule. When a question arises about which types on the
schedule shall apply to the development, the city manager shall determine which comparable land
use type shall apply, or if there is not a comparable land use,then a special study shall be required.
(c)The schedule shall be reviewed periodically and revised as necessary to reflect new data
and technical information that substantially affect the calculation of the proportionate fair share of
capital costs represented by the schedule.
(d) To the extent any impact fee set forth in this Ordinance shall be assessed due to the
construction or improvement of an ADU, such fee in the impact fee schedule shall be charged at
one-quarter the rate in the fee schedule. Thus, by way of example, but for this subsection, if the
impact fees for an ADU are$10,000.00,then the application of this subsection shall reduce the fee
to $2,500.00.
SECTION 3:
Under Section 163.31801(4)(d), Florida Statutes, the lowered impact fee rates may begin as per
Section 9 of this Ordinance, without waiting for a ninety (90) day period.
SECTION 4:
The provisions of this Ordinance shall be liberally construed to effectively carry out its purposes
in the interest of the public health, safety, welfare and convenience.
SECTION 5: CONFLICT
Any portion of the Code of Ordinances, City of Clermont, Florida or any ordinance or part thereof
in conflict with this Ordinance is hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.
SECTION 6: SEVERABILITY
It is declared to be the intent of the City Council that, if any section subsection, sentence, clause,
phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of
competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent
provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof.
d✓
CLE ' CITY OF CLERMONT
0..d ORDINANCE NO. 2026-001
SECTION 7: CODIFICATION
The text of Section 2 of this Ordinance shall be codified as a part of the Clermont City Code. The
codifier is authorized to make editorial changes not effecting the substance of this Ordinance by
the substitution of"Article"for"Ordinance", "Section"for"Paragraph",or otherwise to take such
editorial license.
SECTION 8: ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION
Regardless of whether such inclusion in the Code as described in Section 7 is accomplished,
sections of the Ordinance may be re-numbered or re-lettered and the correction of typographical
and/or scrivener's errors which do not affect the intent may be authorized by the City Manager or
designee, without need of public hearing, by filing a corrected or re-codified copy of same with
the City Clerk.
SECTION 9: PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall be published as provided by law and shall take effect immediately upon its
Second Reading and Final Passage.
CC
CLER' M, CITY OF CLERMONT
o—d ORDINANCE NO. 2026-001
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Clermont, Lake County,
Florida on this 13th day of January 2026.
CITY OF CLERMONT
Tim Murry, yo
ATTEST.,
44w---�
Tracy Ackroyd How , MMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
2
Christian W. Wau , City Attorney
Appendix A
CITY OF
Clermont
Utility and Municipal Development Impact Fee Study
Final Report I May 5, 2023
RAFTELIS
RA FTE L I S
May 5,2023
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
City of Clermont
685 West Montrose Street
Clermont, FL 34711
Subject: Utility and Municipal Development Impact Fees Study
Lady and Gentlemen:
We have completed our study of the utility and municipal impact fees for water and wastewater services, police
services,fire services,and recreational services for the City of Clermont(the"City")and have summarized the results
of our analysis, assumptions, and conclusions in this report, which is submitted for your consideration. This report
summarizes the basis for the proposed utility and municipal impact fees in order to provide funds to meet the City's
capital expenditure requirements for such services allocable to growth.
During the course of the study, it was determined that the proposed impact fees should meet a number of goals and
objectives.These goals and objectives primarily deal with fee sufficiency and level. Specifically, the major objectives
considered in this study include:
• The Impact Fees should be sufficient to fund the projected capital requirements associated with providing
service to new growth and development;
• The Impact Fees should not be used to fund deficiencies in capital needs of the City, if any;and
• The Impact Fees should be based upon reasonable level of service standards which meet the needs of the
City and are similar to industry standards.
The proposed municipal and utility services impact fees presented in this report should meet the above objectives,as
identified by the City during this study. As such, based on information provided by the City and the assumptions
and considerations reflected in this report,Raftelis Financial Consultants,Inc.considers the proposed fees to be cost-
based,reasonable,and representative of the funding requirements of the City.
(Remainder of page intentionally left blank)
341 N.Maitland Avenue,Suite 300,Maitland,FL 32761
www.raftelis.com
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of Clermont
May 5, 2023
Page 2
We appreciate the cooperation and assistance given to us by the City and its staff in the completion of the study.
Sincerely,
RAFTELIS FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS,INC.
Murray M.Hamilton, Jr.
Vice President
AIGLuG (/ �XG -Aip-
Shawn Ocasio
Manager
nzeAA rt
Michelle Galvin
Consultant
MMH/dlc
Attachments
Table of Contents
Tableof Contents ...............................................................................................i
List of Tables
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................. ES-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................... ES-1
EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES. ES-2
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ES-3
SECTION1 — INTRODUCTION .........................................................................1-1
INTRODUCTION.... 1-1
AUTHORIZATION .. .1-1
CRITERIA FOR IMPACT FEES ............... .........1-1
IMPACT FEE METHODS 1-2
SUMMARY OF REPORT 1-3
SECTION 2 — SERVICE AREA..........................................................................2-1
GENERAL .,.. ....... .......2-1
POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT FORECAST ........2-1
PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD............................. .......1-1
FUNCTIONAL POPULATION ALLOCATION......... ........2-2
SECTION 3 — WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES ..........................3-1
GENERAL .3-1
WATER SYSTEM OVERVIEW.............. .3-1
WASTEWATER SYSTEM OVERVIEW.... 3-1
LEVEL OF SERVICE REQUIREMENTS ..........3-1
EXISTING PLANT-IN-SERVICE........... •3-2
ADDITIONAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT .3-3
DESIGN OF WATER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE 3-4
-i-
SECTION 3 — WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES (cont'd.)
DESIGN OF WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE...... . .... .3-5
IMPACT FEE COMPARISONS .. _ ...... ..3-6
SECTION 4 — POLICE SERVICES IMPACT FEE .............................................4-1
GENERAL 4-1
LEVEL OF SERVICE REQUIREMENTS....... 4-1
EXISTING POLICE ASSETS...... . ................. . -.4-2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS .4-2
DESIGN OF POLICE SERVICES IMPACT FEE 4-3
POLICE SERVICES IMPACT FEE ASSUMPTIONS...............................................................................4-4
IMPACT FEE COMPARISONS ..4-5
SECTION 5 — FIRE SERVICES IMPACT FEE ..................................................6-1
GENERAL ....5-1
LEVEL OF SERVICE REQUIREMENTS....... ..5-1
EXISTING INVESTMENT IN DEPARTMENT.. ..5-2
PLANNED FUTURE INVESTMENT IN DEPARTMENT ...... ..5-2
DESIGN OF FIRE RESCUE SERVICES IMPACT FEE ...... ..5-4
FIRE RESCUE SERVICES IMPACT FEE ASSUMPTIONS....................................................................5-5
IMPACTFEE CALCULATION.................................................................................................................5-6
IMPACT FEE COMPARISONS ....5-6
SECTION 6 — PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICE IMPACT FEE ...............6-1
GENERAL ......6-1
EXISTING RECREATIONAL ASSETS........................... .................. 6-1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN............... .. . ................................. .......6-1
DESIGN OF RECREATIONAL FACILITY IMPACT FEE ....6-3
RECREATIONAL FACILITY IMPACT FEE ASSUMPTIONS...................................................................6-4
IMPACTFEE CALCULATION.................................................................................................................6-4
IMPACT FEE COMPARISONS ........6-5
-ii-
List of Tables
Table No. Description
Section 2 Service Area:
2-1 Population Detail and Housing Forecast
2-3 Average Persons per Household
2-3 Functional Population and Employment Data
Section 3 Water and Wastewater System Development Impact Fee Analysis:
3-1 Summary of Water and Wastewater Fixed Assets
3-2 Distribution/Transmission Main Allocator—Water System
3-3 Collection/Transmission Main Allocator—Wastewater System
34 Summary of Capital Improvement Program
3-5 Allocation of Planned Water Capital Improvements
3-6 Allocation of Planned Wastewater Capital Improvements
3-7 Development of Water System Impact Fee
3-8 Development of Wastewater System Impact Fee
3-9 Proposed Impact Fees for Water and Wastewater Service
3-10 Comparison of Impact Fees for Water and Wastewater System
Section 4 -Police Services Impact Fee Analysis:
4-1 Summary of Existing Personnel
4-2 Summary of Existing Capital Equipment, Vehicles,and Facilities
4-3 Inventory of Proposed Capital Equipment, Vehicles, and Facilities
4-4 Summary of Capital Costs to Provide Police Protection Services
4-5 Impact Fee Allocation—Base Capacity /Variable
4-6 Police Services Impact Fee Comparison
Section 5 -Fire Services Impact Fee Analysis:
5-1 Summary of Existing Personnel
5-2 Summary of Existing Capital Equipment, Vehicles,and Facilities
5-3 Inventory of Proposed Capital Equipment,Vehicles,and Facilities
5-4 Summary of Capital Costs to Provide Fire Rescue Services
5-5 Impact Fee Allocation—Base Capacity /Variable
5-6 Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee Comparison
Section 6 Parks and Recreation Services Impact Fee Analysis:
6-1 Inventory of City Parks and Recreation Facilities
6-2 Summary of Existing Capital Equipment, Vehicles,and Facilities
6-3 Summary of Capital Projects to Improvement and Expand Recreation Services
6-4 Design of Recreation Impact Fee
6-5 Proposed Impact Fees
6-6 Phase-in Schedule
6-7 Parks and Recreation Services Impact Fee Comparison
Appendices:
Appendix 1 Florida Impact Fee Act
Appendix 2 Inventory of Existing Police Capital Equipment,Vehicles,and Facilities
Appendix 3 Inventory of Existing Fire Capital Equipment,Vehicles, and Facilities
Appendix 4 Inventory of Existing Parks and Recreation Capital Equipment, Vehicles,and Facilities
-iii-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Executive Summary
The purpose of an impact fee is to assign, to the extent practical, growth-related capital costs to new development
responsible for such costs. To the extent new population growth and associated development imposes identifiable
capital costs to municipal services,equity and modern capital funding practices suggest the assignment of such cost
to those residents or system users responsible for such costs. The City of Clermont(the "City") has recognized this
capital funding strategy as being an appropriate method of funding the certain future capital requirements of the City.
The City has,in the past,adopted impact fees for the following utility and municipal services:
• Water and Wastewater Services;
• Police Services;
• Fire Services;and
• Parks and Recreation Services.
This report addresses the impact fees associated with water and wastewater service,police services,fire services,and
parks and recreational services(collectively, the "Utility and Municipal Services Development Impact Fees"). The
City currently has impact fees for all these services as noted above. Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. ("Raftelis")
was retained to review and develop proposed fees, as appropriate.
Based on the subsequent discussions in this section, the following table summarizes the City's existing to proposed
impact fees for the single-family residential classification as follows:
ImpactResidential
Existing Fees Proposed Fees
Water $2,927.00 $2,836.00
Wastewater 4,737.00 4,830.00
Police 526.00 580.00
Fire 637.00 1,370.00
Parks and Recreation 2,739.00 2,984.00
Total $11,666.00 $12,600.00
(Remainder of page intentionally left blank)
ES-1
A comparison of the City's existing and proposed single-family residential impact fees levels to other local
municipalities are shown below for informational purposes.
$14,000 $12,600
$11,566
$12,000
$10,000
$8,000 Surveyed Average:$7,531.00
$6,000
$4,000
i
$2,000
$0
way cee'!
e�a�ec�aJate`' :(1` va 0�a
Jeo
� ea 09 \°J a ee oe
yhW 4q:'� °a �o �a ` Vak . Ok ° ao k
a
6-.-A �0
C?
Police aw,Fire Parks Water �Wastewater Neighboring Average
As shown above, the City's calculated impact fees are comparable to the impact fees charged other Florida
communities surveyed.
The existing and proposed fees shown above for parks and recreation are only charged to residential properties,while
fees for water,wastewater,police,and fire services are also charged to non-residential properties.The non-residential
fees are unique to the service requirements of each property.A detailed discussion on impact fees for both residential
and non-residential properties is provided for in subsequent sections of this study report.
Extraordinary Circumstances
In light of the recent updates to the Florida Impact Fee Act(F.S. 163.31801 Section 6)that provides for limitations
on increasing impact fees, outside of extraordinary circumstances, the above tables demonstrate the fee levels that
are recommended for adoption by the City. The extraordinary circumstances include rapid population growth and
recent large inflationary impacts to construction costs. Additionally, the City recently approved an updated Capital
Improvement Plan ("CIP") that identifies major investments in new facilities that will be required to serve growth
that will place significantly more demand on the City's services for wastewater, police, and fire. These significant
ES-2
capital needs justify having the fully calculated fees implemented for wastewater,police,and fire services.Additional
tables and discussion, including of extraordinary circumstances as applicable are provided in each section of this
report.Below is a brief description and justification for each fee:
• Wastewater System—Need to meet permitting and regulatory requirements.Expansion of capacity required
to meet expected customer growth. Final bid prices associated with this project are significantly higher than
initial estimates.
• Police— Significant increases in population are projected and therefore significant additional staffing is
anticipated to maintain and improve its level of service. The police department will require an additional
substation training facility to provide service to growth.
• Fire— Significant increases in population are projected and therefore response times are anticipated to be
stressed unless new fire stations and supporting apparatus are provided in closer proximity to provide for
public health and safety.
Findings and Recommendations
The following is a summary of the observations and recommendations following our investigation, analyses, and
preparation of this report:
The impact fees must be reasonably related to the cost of providing capital facilities/equipment needed to
accommodate new growth. The impact fees collected must be used by the City to address the capital costs
related to serving new development. Based on the information made available by the City, the proposed
impact fees are designed to meet these Florida legal requirements.
Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 163.31801, the City must provide notice no less than 90 days before
the effective date of an ordinance or resolution imposing a new or increased impact fee.
Collection of the fee may not be required before the issuance of the building permit.
In compliance with Florida Statutes, the City should collect and maintain revenue from each type of
municipal fee in designated sub-accounts and use such fees on those facilities designated for each purpose.
The City should adopt the impact fees as proposed to ensure adequate funding sources are available to fund
future service expansion projects needed to provide the identified level of service to new growth.
The fees developed within this report reflect recovery of identified costs and the City has discretion to phase-
in or otherwise adopt less than the fully calculated fees. However, the adoption of fees less than the fully
calculated rates should be applied to all land uses equally in order to maintain the calculations herein in
correct proportion.Adopting less than the calculated rates would increase the reliance on general fund and
other revenue sources to meet the demands of growth.
The City should end the practice of annually indexing the impact fees.
The subsequent sections of this report provide detailed discussions of the existing and proposed impact fees for water,
wastewater,police, fire, and parks and recreation services.
ES-3
SECTION i — INTRODUCTION
Introduction
The City of Clermont (the "City") is located in Lake County (the "County") and is 22 miles west of the City of
Orlando, a major metropolitan area. The City, incorporated in 1916, now encompasses 19.15 square miles and
provides an array of utility and municipal facilities and services to its residents. The utility and municipal services in
demand include water and wastewater management,police, fire, and parks and recreation. Based on the published
Census in 2020,the City's permanent population was 43,021.Based on historical growth trends and discussions with
the City, the current estimated population is 46,655 as of 2022. It is anticipated that the City will have significant
growth over the next 20 years with the City's population projected to reach 73,363 with approximately 25,129
housing units by 2040. In addition to housing, the City anticipates commercial development to continue to support
new residents. In order to meet this anticipated growth and development and to maintain current levels of service,
the City will need to fund capital improvements to serve such development.
The City's Utility and Municipal Impact Fees were last updated in 2014. Although the City has indexed such fee
annually thereafter,rates need to be reviewed periodically to ensure that such fees reflect current actual investments
made to serve growth, and to adequately reflect additional needs required to service new developments. Therefore,
the City authorized Raftelis, to evaluate the water,wastewater,police,fire,and parks and recreation impact fees.
Authorization
Raftelis was authorized by the City to evaluate and develop impact fees for water and wastewater, police, fire, and
parks and recreation related capital facilities pursuant to an agreement between the City and Raftelis. The scope of
work for this project, as defined in the agreement,was to:
For each service, review and analyze the capital requirements of the City that are needed to meet the level
of service standards for the municipal function.This analysis includes a review of. i)the existing and future
facility and equipment inventory of each specific municipal function; ii)service area population and
development demographics and future needs; and iii)services provided by class of customers.
Where appropriate, develop a fee to be charged to new development in order to recover the capital costs
associated with providing municipal services. This analysis includes the apportionment of costs among
customer/development classifications, and the development of the fee per equivalent billing unit.
Develop a comparison of the impact fees and associated billing attributes for similar charges imposed by
other neighboring jurisdictions.
Prepare a report that documents our analyses, assumptions, and conclusions for consideration by the City
Manager and City Council.
Criteria for Impact Fees
The purpose of an impact fee is to assign,to the extent practical,growth-related capital costs to those new customers
that benefit from the facilities funded by such expenditures. To the extent new population growth and associated
development imposes identifiable capital costs to municipal services, equity and modern capital funding practices
1-1
suggest the assignment of such costs to those residents or system users responsible for such costs rather than the
existing population base. Generally,this practice has been labeled as "growth paying its own way."
Historically, impact fees in Florida were a result of home rule powers with the requirements associated with the
development, administration, accounting, and expenditure governed by case law. However, Section 163.31801 of
the Florida Statutes, known as the "Florida Impact Fee Act", was created on June 14, 2006, which placed specific
requirements and limitations on that home rule authority.This statue has been amended several times since its initial
adoption,including significant additional provisions in 2021 such as limiting the percentage increase for a change in
impact fees. Appendix 1 at the end of the report includes the full Florida impact fee statute.
The statute provides specific impact fee criteria, certain precedents established by case law also constitute the legal
requirements associated with impact fees. Some of the major criteria includes the following:
The impact fee should be reasonably equitable to all parties; that is, the amount of the fee must bear a
relationship to the amount of services requested;
The system of fees and charges should be set up so that there is not an intentional windfall to existing users;
The impact fee should, to the extent practical, only cover the capital cost of construction and related costs
thereto (engineering, legal, financing, administrative, etc.) for increases in or expansions of capacity or
capital requirements that are required solely due to growth.Therefore,expenses due to normal renewal and
replacement of a facility(e.g.,replacement of a capital asset) should be borne by all users of the facility or
municipality.Similarly,increased expenses due to operation and maintenance of that facility should be borne
by all users of the facility;and
The local government must adopt a revenue-producing ordinance that explicitly sets forth restrictions on
revenues (uses thereof) that the imposition of the impact fee generates. Therefore, the funds collected from
the impact fees should be retained in a separate account, and separate accounting must be made for those
funds to ensure that they are used only for the lawful purposes described.
Based on the criteria provided above, the impact fees herein will: 1)include local current costs of improvements
associated with the capacities needed to serve new growth; 2)not reflect costs of improvements associated with the
renewal and replacement ("R&R") of existing capital assets or deficiencies in level of service attributed to existing
development;and 3)not include any costs of operation and maintenance of the capital improvements and equipment.
This section provides only a general background regarding impact fees. Certain circumstances and issues regarding
the interpretation of specific statutes or case law should be addressed by qualified legal counsel.
Impact Fee Methods
There are several different methods for the calculation of an impact fee.The calculation is dependent on the type of
fee being calculated(e.g.,water,police services,recreational services,transportation,etc.),cost and engineering data
available, and the availability of other local data such as household and population projections, current levels of
service, and other related items. The impact fees reflected in this report are predominately based on three separate
methods. These three methods were: i)the improvements-driven method; ii)the standards-driven method; and
iii)the buy-in or recoupment approach.These methods have been utilized in the development of impact fees for local
governments throughout Florida.
1-2
The improvements-driven method is an approach that utilizes a specific list of existing or planned capital
improvements over a period of time. For example, the fee may correspond to the level of capital improvements that
have been identified in the capital improvements element of the Comprehensive Plan or capital improvement budget
of the entity.The standards-driven method does not utilize the cost of improvements based on anticipated needs as
stated in the capital improvement plan but rather uses a set of theoretical standards to determine the cost of the
improvements associated with new growth. The buy-in or recoupment method is based on this historical cost of
assets, and adjustments to the basis of these assets, currently in service and the current population. The primary
difference between the three methodologies is how the capital costs, which must be recovered from the application
of the fee, are calculated.
The proposed impact fees herein for the utility and municipal services include the application of these methods based
on the capital facilities required to provide services and meet the City's service level standards. Where appropriate,
the blending of methods occurred, and a more complete discussion of the methods used for the determination of the
impact fees are presented in Sections 3 through 6.
Summary of Report
In addition to Section 1,this report has been subdivided into five(5)other sections.The following is a brief discussion
of the remaining sections included in this report.
Section 2— Service Area. This section of the report provides a general discussion of the residential and
non-residential land use characteristics. Also presented in this section is the forecast of the residential
dwelling units and non-residential development that is necessary in the design of the impact fees for the
municipal services.
Section 3— Water and Wastewater Services Impact Fee. This section discusses the development of the proposed
impact fee for water and wastewater services, including the capital cost requirements associated with
providing these services, the methodology for the determination of the proposed fees, assumptions
utilized in the design of the fees,and other factors associated with the fee determination.
Section 4— Police Services Impact Fee.This section discusses the development of the proposed impact fee for police
services, including the capital requirements associated with providing police services,the methodology
for the determination of the proposed fees, assumptions utilized in the design of the fees, and other
factors associated with the fee determination.
Section 5— Fire Services Impact Fee. This section discusses the development of the proposed impact fee for fire
protection services, including the capital requirements associated with providing fire services, the
methodology for the determination of the proposed fees, assumptions utilized in the design of the fees,
and other factors associated with the fee determination.
Section 6— Parks and Recreation Impact Fee. This section discusses the development of the recreation impact fee,
including the capital requirements associated with providing parks and recreation facilities to the City's
residents,the methodology for the determination of the proposed fees,assumptions utilized in the design
of the fees, and other factors associated with the fee determination.
1-3
SECTION 2 — SERVICE AREA
General
This section provides a general discussion of the current service area,including population and housing statistics and
other demographic information related to land use.Additionally,a discussion of the anticipated growth in population
and associated growth in residential dwelling units is also contained in this section.
Population and Development Forecast
Regardless of the approach taken to formulate impact fees, it is necessary to develop a forecast of the population of
the City in order to: i)have an appropriate planning horizon to ensure that capital improvement needs and costs are
apportioned over a suitable growth segment;ii)link level of service("LOS")requirements to the capital facility plan;
and iii)identify any deficiencies in existing capital facilities related to the LOS standards and current population
served.
As shown in Table 2-1 at the end of this section, the City's estimated total population as of 2022 was 46,655. Based
on information provided by the City, it is estimated that the total population will approach approximately 55,918
residents by 2027 and 73,363 residents by the year 2040. Thus, the population growth anticipated by the City is
expected to be moderate,approximately 2.55%on an average annual basis through the year 2040.
UnitsHistorical and Projected Population and Dwelling
Total Avg. Persons
Year Population[1] Total Units[2] per Unit
2020 43,021 14,736 2.89
2022 46,655 15,981 2.92
2025 52,690 18,048 2.92
2027 55,918 19,153 2.92
2030 61,133 20,940 2.92
2035 67,541 23,135 2.92
2040 73,363 25,129 2.92
[1] Population Projections based on the 2010 and 2020 Census.
[2] Historical amounts and projections as obtained from the Florida Housing Data
Clearinghouse.
To the extent the projection of future development materially changes, it would then be appropriate for the City to
re-evaluate the impact fees developed in this report.
Persons per Household
In order to develop recreational impact fees based on the type of residential properties to estimate the impact on
recreational facilities, Raftelis evaluated the existing residential units within the City. Table 2-2 at the end of this
section provides the detail analyses to estimate the persons per household based on the number of bedrooms for each
residential dwelling unit.The following table summarizes the results:
2-1
Historicale Projected
Residential Unit Persons per Unit
0-1 Bedroom 1.43
2 Bedrooms 2.15
3 Bedrooms 2.86
4 Bedrooms 3.58
5+Bedrooms 4.30
Functional Population Allocation
In order to update police and fire impact fees by land use,the capital costs need to be apportioned between residential
and non-residential properties. The apportionment is accomplished through a functional population allocation
method.
The use of functional population'to develop more equitable impact fees has widely been used in Florida since the
1980s and remains a vital tool in estimating service demands between customer classes. Specifically, this
methodology is applied to apportion capital costs associated with public facilities,police protection, fire rescue and
other municipal services allocable to the non-residential classes.
The concept of functional population is incorporated in order to spread capital costs more equitably between
residential and non-residential land-uses. Businesses place demands upon public services in the same manner as
residents do, and it is equitable to spread these costs based on the average number of people expected to be present.
For residential use, the allocation is calculated per resident based on the average amount of time spent at the
residence.The resident's remaining time is then allocated as either an employee and/or visitor to the remaining non-
residential classes as determined using traffic generations, estimated employment data, and anticipated operations.
The net result is the total number of person hours per location.
Table 2-3 provides the details used to estimate the functional population coefficients. It should be noted that based
on discussions with the City the proposed number of non-residential land uses will be revised and reduced from the
cur-rent listing of 79 land uses down to six(6).This change will provide the City with some administrative flexibility
while still allowing for the recognition of differing property types for fee application purposes. The functional
population results were used to update the police and fire services impact fees provided for in Sections 4 and 5 of this
report.
(Remainder of page intentionally left blank)
[2] Nicholas, Nelson, and Juergensmeyer. A Practitioner's Guide to Development Impact Fees. American Planning
Association, 1991.
2-2
Page I of 1
Section 2
City of Clermont
Utility and Municipal Impact Fee Study
List of Tables
Table Description
2-1 Population Detail and Housing Forecast
2-2 Average Persons Per Household
2-3 Functional Population and Employment Data
Page 1 of 1
Table 2-1
City of Clermont
Utility and Municipal Impact Fee Study
Population Detail and Housine Forecast
Annual
Line Average Total Total Avg.Pop.
No. Fiscal Year Rate Population [1] Units [2] per Unit
1 2010 28,742 9,961 2.89
2 2020 4.12% 43,021 14,736 2.92
3 2022 4.14% 46,655 15,981 2.92
4 2025 4.14% 52,690 18,048 2.92
5 2027 3.02% 55,918 19,153 2.92
6 2030 3.02% 61,133 20,940 2.92
7 2035 2.01% 67,541 23,135 2.92
8 2040 1.67% 73,363 25,129 2.92
9 Overall 2022 -2040 2.55%
Footnotes
[1] Population Projections based on the 2010 and 2020 Census.
[2] Historical amounts and projections as obtained from the Florida Housing Data Clearinghouse.
Page 1 of 1
Table 2-2
City of Clermont
Utility and Municipal Impact Fee Study
Aversee Persons Per Household
Est.
Line Existing Persons Weighted Weighted Population Persons
No. Housing Type Units[1 Per Unit Units Units-% Per Unit Per Unit
1 Residential Units
2 0- 1 Bedroom 1,317 2.00 2,634 4.0% 1,896 1.43
3 2 Bedrooms 4,267 3.00 12,801 19.6% 9,165 2.15
4 3 Bedrooms 4,699 4.00 18,796 28.8% 13,457 2.86
5 4 Bedrooms 3,252 5.00 16,260 25.0% 11,641 3.58
6 5+Bedrooms 2,446 6.00 14,675 22.5% 10,506 4.30
7 Total 15,981 N/A 65� 1�00.0% �46,6555 2.92 [1]
Footnotes
[1) Based on the 2010 and 2020 U.S.Census.
T"I
CIO aO Cl.ra
1'fih5 W M-klpoly.a Fw&W]
Lw f3T T.,p.Ika O y OeW.w T,�o a"A. Pmpk 9a V.I pr AS 14v.p. }fuu. 0.}Pa w'dd•P..s iiouam9i. Frr .
fy, tadtY.C_. Catr. wllmi wl)f Tdpb (5,) b�l V:- V-Eslln}m +Iv vim wart f4 FiWo5w Pr ..Vr: T.w AP Paa 13]
1.1 I61 kl Ibl Rl v M 1.1 Pl bl 01 Ikl M 1.1
W.MeAW-Fn M.a..pl P.Wa WA WA WA WA WA WA xA WA WA WA WA /-'A G.6]IYI6
wNaMa5f.1
3 vtamkyw.aA,,.:e 110 Iy60 FqR 1.71 Olf 1.01 1]! O.J. 0.93 0.25 IW 500 IJ.S( 365 la tl 0.a[t5.]
w IA"sq t T;0 1FF I.Of a. 613 IAO 100 500 ON J61 J�61 OX105t
Ilaablfad 319 ■[r 7.9F 4M IAf 20J .11 1.03 1a. I300 7.00 e6.0 [9LI0 ]J190 3.-7151
lMv B.J3np TIF 1p10 sq IO.N 3.62 1.05 1.19 3.26 - 0.50 /00 f.00 13031 6W 137.II 0./161!i
6 x.rl 0 1,OMF0F1 3161 1" 1.05 2.1 113 3316 IAO 1. ].00 I... 03113 a126[ 1156111
Au:ud 4.ir[Fwky(A1F) 253 ow 0.n-
FI.I T.oc 11 a EAIm FI!�s
RI T1u f5na'v�a6 bbns:Es rip y.64T Mia Va•+m Nebes In rya+tin[.:wvPe 6f p.mpa me
I.I N.®N•m.baw
I61 Faa MI.-Hosdcfd 11-1 n.ul.la em.paucT F.uq pupa.
Icl f,ca lf•Fdks fiEY.1.mJ Pe wplPl•
Iq •llbl+i•FLI»'161
lal t®aaplm P..b.a
Al Te..rv:m r•ao:af.r
f1 Tv.amour
01 -lal•Pl If
BI -10•GI'W
11
-61'PI
Irl -mlz+•T
111 Fem..a c3supr.pa Vaiak Erd o rsa:car..Ou
Taw wok., ,1oz
)bca C.paol.6 ]19.1�
q'sYm l:rPw ;f1]
Wuk..N.('rpaAd 31,N5
Taw Vast M,1:1
fltim..•w[h..pr l'asJ. I n3
ul R.i0ai.I POW� ewavgw oc 6a0a.w.a'+•P1••,.l..euumlo..0 ax.
F--P-- (MI9) 51,350
P. of Uipbk q'p1x. TIASa
A•'blak MWave 19,.5t
P-
T-.- U,102
fiom Avukbk P°0.. DIM
laJ lfow 910,009
13m pr Dq.R.:Ima wukb. 1200
Av.ya Ifo,.a T Dn.Rs:kwa-w Waa 1?.Tl
Tew AWar 1 .Rr:1mr 315,370
Awyc lba R P•.•w RrsYau-V,au.=tlnx I100
Tow F:m-.a.Ibao.tier.w Ra:laa 136,67I
Ta.l ik•n.Ratla: NI.149
ra.l 11an r 1s1fv..Wa v:��. Iµabo
P.aav a Twi S1w.A RriAa. 0.6333
IJI .W.W l.A�y F.i1RT(A13)FcumJ Pq.l.w•Fau k brd rym Uta k0owio[w�p4a
Rsihe,p.a.1 1.00
Oe.,pc.y.4 fiASa
AGj.0 W n.m.pa ak O.t0
)for..pa NW
waken Pv a� F�J
A'ak ban p.6.5 9.00
Ay.Vro..act ).00
FmcYm.l pmulrm tar 0.R
SECTION 3 — WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES
General
This section of the report summarizes the basis for the development of the City's proposed water and wastewater
impact fees. Included in this section is a discussion of the design and calculation of the proposed water and
wastewater impact fees for consideration by the City.
The development of the impact fees in this section were primarily based on a hybrid or blending of the three methods
described previously. This hybrid methodology recognizes existing available and unused capacity available from
existing facilities, which are currently in service and available to meet near-term growth requirements, along with
incremental costs for new facilities to derive a cost allocable to new growth over the next several years.
Water System Overview
The City's water system ("Water System") includes finished water supply, treatment, transmission mains and
finished water distribution facilities. The City currently owns two water plants and two wells that are permitted to
treat approximately 21.726 million gallons of flow ("MGD") on a maximum daily flow basis ("MDF") per day.
When accounting for historical peaking relationships this is approximately 12.193 MGD on an average daily flow
basis ("ADF"). The City also owns approximately 255 miles of transmission and distribution lines that provide
service throughout the City.
Wastewater System Overview
The City's wastewater system ("Wastewater System")includes wastewater treatment, transmission, and collection
facilities. The City currently owns one wastewater treatment plant that is designed to treat 4.0 MGD on an ADF
basis. The City owned transmission and collection system consists of approximately 245 miles of lines and is
comprised of gravity and force mains along with lift stations and other supporting infrastructure.
Level of Service Requirements
In the evaluation of the capital facility needs for providing water and wastewater utility services, it is critical that
Level of Service("LOS") standards are established. Pursuant to Section 163.3164 of the Florida Statutes, the level
of service means an indicator of the extent or degree of service provided by,or proposed to be provided by,a facility
based on and related to the operational characteristics of the facility. Level of service shall indicate the capacity per
unit of demand for each public facility. Essentially, the level of service standards are established in order to ensure
that adequate facility capacity will be provided for future development and for purposes of issuing development
orders or permits, pursuant to F.S. Section 163.3202(2)(g). As further stated in the statutes, each local government
shall establish a LOS standard for each public facility located within the boundary,for which such local government
has authority to issue development orders or permits.
For water and wastewater service,the level of service that is commonly used in the industry is the amount of capacity
(service)allocable to an Equivalent Residential Unit("ERU")expressed as the amount of usage(gallons)allocated
on an average daily basis. The level of service generally represents the amount of capacity allocable to an ERU,
whether or not such capacity is actually used (commonly referred to as the "readiness-to-serve"). An ERU is
representative of the average capacity required to service a typical individually metered single-family residential
3-1
connection. This class of users represents the largest number of customers served by the water and wastewater
systems and generally the lowest level of usage requirements for a specifically metered account. Based on a review
of historical sales and usage we were able to verify the existing LOS of 220 gallons per day for the water system. We
also propose maintaining the existing level of service of 220 gallons per day for the wastewater system.The following
table summarizes the City's existing and proposed Water and Wastewater System's LOS levels:
Existing Levels of Service for Residential Customers
Existing Service Levels:
1 Water ERU=220 gpd(ADF)
1 Wastewater ERU=220 gpd(ADF)
gpd = gallons per day
ADF = Average Daily Flow
These LOS standards are consistent with the capacity planning and Florida Department of Environmental Protection
("FDEP")permitting requirements for the City and are also generally comparable with those utilized by other utilities
throughout the state of Florida.
Existing Plant-in-Service
In the determination of the Impact Fees associated with the servicing of future customers,any excess capacity of the
existing utility system available to serve such growth was considered. Since this capacity is available to serve the
near-term incremental growth of the System, it would be appropriate to evaluate the capacity availability of such
facilities. In order to evaluate the availability of the existing utility plant-in-service to meet future capacity needs, it
was necessary to functionalize the plant by specific plant requirement. The functionalization of the existing plant is
necessary to: i)identify those assets that should be included in the determination of the capital facilities fees; and
ii)match existing plant type to the capital improvements to meet future service needs.
The functional cost categories are based on the purpose of the assets and the service that such assets served. The
following is a general summary of the functional cost categories for the utility plant-in-service identified in this report.
CategoriesFunctional Plant
Water Service[") Wastewater Service[•] Equipment
Treatment Plant Treatment Plant General Equipment
Transmission Transmission Lines/Lift Stations Vehicles
Meters/Distribution Collection
['1 Amounts shown would not include any assets that were contributed by a developer(primarily water distribution and
wastewater collection lines)or grant funded.
It is necessary to functionalize the utility plant into cost categories so that a proper fee can be developed. Generally,
the costs of on-site facilities that serve a specific development or customer such as water distribution and wastewater
collection lines, meters and services, and fire hydrants are usually: i)donated by a developer(a contribution of the
plant); ii)recovered from the individual properties through an assessment program based on those properties that
receive special benefit from such facilities or from the application of a main line extension fee to recover the specific
cost of such facilities;or iii)funded from the customer directly(e.g., by a "front-foot"charge where the on-site lines
3-2
were initially financed by the utility and then paid by the customer,or an installation charge to recover the cost of a
new service line and/or the meter).
The City provided Raftelis with a fixed asset register report identifying the fixed assets in service by function as of
September 30, 2021 for the System. The summary of the functionalization of the existing utility plant is included in
Table 3-1 at the end of this section.This functionalization of the existing utility plant-in-service represents the original
cost of such assets(gross book value)and was based on the reported in-service values as of September 30,2021.The
following is a summary of the functionalization of the System's existing utility plant-in-service as shown in Table 3-1:
Water System and Wastewater System Fixed Assets
Water System[*] Wastewater System[*]
Function Amount Percent Amount Percent
Treatment Plants $25,196,445 47.26% $42,154,532 67.57%
Transmission Lines 9,883,592 18.54% 6,348,551 10.18%
Lift Stations 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
Meter Services 3,110,086 5.83% 0 0.00%
Distribution/Collection Lines 13,128,447 24.63% 11,790,166 18.90%
Vehicles and Equipment 1,992,525 3.74% 2,088,963 3.35%
Totals $53,311,095 100,00% $62,382,212 100.00%
[q Amounts as provided by City staff and found on Table 3-1.
Additional Capital Investment
The City's Water and Wastewater System Capital Improvement Program("CIP")for the Fiscal Years 2022 through
2027,as prepared and estimated by the utility staff outlines the best estimate of future capital improvements for the
System. These capital projects include: i)upgrades of existing assets to accommodate new and existing customers;
ii)new assets that will increase the existing investment the systems and benefit existing and new customers; and
iii)replacements of existing assets or projects that generally only benefit current users of the System(e.g.,existing
plant renewal and replacement,reliability projects).
As shown on Tables 3-4, 3-5, and 3-6 at the end of this report, the CIP has recognized approximately$64.0 million
in capital projects to be completed over the six-year period for the Water System and$85.5 million in capital projects
for the Wastewater System totaling$149.5 million for the combined System.
Based on our understanding of the fair share apportionment rule as identified by case law, only production /
treatment and major backbone transmission costs were recognized in the water and wastewater impact fee
calculations. General transmission and distribution/ collection project costs were not recognized because they:
i)generally are not System-wide costs(i.e.,distribution/collection project costs tend to benefit specific customers);
ii)in many instances, are funded by a specific charge applied to a customer(e.g.,water meter installation fee); and
iii)are often contributed as part of the development process (e.g., it would not be fair for a developer who has
contributed the distribution/ collection assets to pay an impact fee, which includes recovery of distribution/
collection projects).
3-3
A summary of all the adjustments recognized in order to arrive at the treatment and major transmission costs
recognized for impact fee determination purposes are shown as follows:
Derivation ..
Water Wastewater Combined
_ System System System
Projects in Utility's Six-year CIP $63,994,600 $85,540,884 $149,535,484
Excluded Projects (11,602,207) (13,834,305) (25,436,512)
Total Treatment and Major Transmission $52,392,393 $71,706,579 $124,098,972
Capital Costs Recognized in Impact Fees
["] Amounts shown derived from Tables 3-5 and 3-6.
Design of Water System Impact Fee
As shown on Table 3-9 at the end of this report,the total calculated impact fee for the Water System is$2,836. This
represents a decrease in the fee of$91 or 3.1%below the current fee of$2,927 per ERU.
In the development of the proposed water system impact fee,several assumptions were utilized or incorporated.The
major assumptions utilized in the design of the calculated Water System Impact Fee are:
The Water System capital improvement program as prepared by staff for the Fiscal Years 2022 through 2027
was reviewed and the capital costs were apportioned:i)by functional category; and ii)to existing and future
users in the determination of the water system impact fee.Those facilities that were considered to be allocable
to growth were included in the fee determination at full cost(i.e., 100% of the total cost). The CIP capital
costs recognized in the water system impact fee analysis are shown on Table 3-5 at the end of this report.
For the capital improvements identified as major treatment or transmission system upgrades,which would
benefit both existing and future users, the total cost of such improvements has been recognized in the
analysis.These costs were allocated to existing and future customers based on the nature and purpose of the
project as described to us by the City.
No capital facility expansion costs associated with existing distribution facilities,including meters,hydrants,
on-site distribution facilities, and services,have been included in the calculation of the water system impact
fee since developers typically contribute such facilities or the City has adopted a separate fee (e.g., water
meter installation fee)to recover the cost of such capital additions.
An allowance of$631,015 of the total of(or 30%)of the remaining interest/financing costs(of$2,111,831)
associated with the Series 2017 Water and Sewer Bonds ("Series 2017 Bonds") have been included in the
water fee calculations. This debt was used to finance water system assets that serve existing customers and
future growth.
Because:i)the water system is operated as an enterprise fund;ii)all financial resources received by the utility
stay within the fund for the benefit of such system; and iii)the costs reflected in the fee are at original cost
and not adjusted for any fair market value to reflect current cost conditions;. All impact fee funds remain in
the system and the long-term capital financing costs for infrastructure constructed and available to serve new
3-4
growth are mitigated by using the impact fees for ongoing expansion-related capital project financing or for
the direct payment of the annual expansion-related debt service payments.
As shown on Table 3-7 at the end of this section, the Water System Impact Fee was calculated utilizing:i)estimated
capital costs for the supply, treatment and transmission system; ii)current fixed asset and capacity data;and iii)the
financing cost data associated with the Series 2017 Bonds available to Raftelis regarding the water system. By
designing the water system impact fee to recover costs on a prospective basis, an attempt is made to design a charge
that will provide funds on a reasonable basis in order to meet the future needs of the water system.It should be noted
that in the event the construction costs,capacity requirements,or utility service area materially change from what is
reflected on Table 3-5, the water system impact fee might need to be adjusted accordingly.
Design of Wastewater System Impact Fee
As shown on Table 3-9 at the end of this section, the calculated treatment and transmission component impact fee
for the wastewater system is$4,830 per ERU. This represents an increase in the fee of$93 or 2.0%when compared
with the current fee of$4,737 per ERU.
In the development of the proposed wastewater system impact fee,several assumptions were utilized or incorporated
in the analysis. The major assumptions utilized in the design of the proposed wastewater system impact fee are:
The wastewater system capital improvement program as prepared by staff for the Fiscal Years 2022 through
2027 was reviewed and the capital costs were apportioned: i)by functional category; and ii)to existing and
future users in the determination of the wastewater system impact fee. Those facilities that were considered
to be allocable to growth were included in the fee determination at full cost(i.e., 100%of the total cost).The
CIP capital costs recognized in the wastewater system impact fee analysis are shown on Table 3-6 at the end
of this report.
For the capital improvements identified as major treatment or transmission system upgrades, which would
benefit both existing and future users, the total cost of such improvements has been recognized in the
analysis. These costs were allocated to existing and future customers based on the nature and purpose of the
project as provided by described to us by the City.
No capital facility costs associated with the existing collection facilities, including local lift stations,
manholes, laterals, and on-site collection facilities have been included in the calculation of the wastewater
system impact fees since the developer generally contributes such facilities, or City has adopted a separate
fee (e.g.,wastewater tap-on fee) to recover such capital additions. All capital improvements to such
respective facilities in the CIP were also not recognized in the wastewater system impact fee analysis.
An allowance of$1,121,805 of the total of(or 53%)of the remaining interest/financing costs(of$2,111,831)
associated with the Series 2017 Water and Sewer Bonds ("Series 2017 Bonds") have been included in the
water fee calculations. This debt was used to finance water system assets that serve existing customers and
future growth. Additionally, the planned interest/financing costs associated with the proposed 2023
borrowing to expand the wastewater treatment plant have also been included in the fee calculation at
$12,771,600. The wastewater treatment assets financed by this borrowing are anticipated to provide service
to new growth in the future.
3-5
Because:i)the wastewater system is operated as an enterprise fund;ii)all financial resources received by the
utility stay within the fund for the benefit of such system; and iii)the costs reflected in the fee are at original
cost and not adjusted for any fair market value to reflect current cost conditions.All impact fee funds remain
in the system and the long-term capital financing costs for infrastructure constructed and available to serve
new growth are mitigated by using the impact fees for ongoing expansion-related capital project financing or
for the direct payment of the annual expansion-related debt service payments.
As shown on Table 3-8 at the end of this report, the wastewater system impact fee was calculated utilizing: i)the
estimated treatment and transmission-related capital costs of the wastewater system; ii)the current fixed asset and
capacity data available to Raftelis regarding the City's wastewater system;and iii)the financing cost data associated
with the Series 2017 Bonds and proposed 2023 Bonds. By designing the wastewater system impact fees to recover
costs on a prospective basis, an attempt is made to design a charge that will provide funds on a reasonable basis in
order to meet the future needs of the wastewater system. It should be noted that in the event the construction costs,
capacity requirements, or utility service area materially change from what is reflected on Tables 3-6 and 3-8, the
wastewater system impact fees might need to be adjusted accordingly.
Impact Fee Comparisons
In order to provide additional information to the City regarding the existing and proposed impact fees,a comparison
of the existing and calculated fees for the City with similar related capital charges imposed by of other Florida
jurisdictions was prepared. Table 3-10 at the end of this report, provides a comparison of the City's existing and
proposed impact fees for single-family residential connections with the fees or comparable charges currently imposed
by other municipal/governmental water system and the wastewater systems located across Florida. It is important
to note that utilities may be different from a facility standpoint, and the methods used in the development of the
water and wastewater impact fees imposed may vary. Moreover, no analysis has been performed to determine
whether 100%of the cost of new facilities is recovered from impact fees or some percentage less than 100%with the
balance recovered through the user charges.Additionally,the types of capital facilities currently in service or planned
for the utility may have a material impact fee charged by a local government. For example, the costs of wastewater
effluent disposal utilizing a deep injection well system generally has a higher capital cost per unit of capacity than
use of a surface water discharge such as an outfall to a bay or river. The capital costs associated with constructing
reverse osmosis water treatment facilities, which treat brackish water, are higher than those of lime softening
facilities,which treat freshwater.
Some reasons why impact fees differ among utilities:
• Source of supply;
• Proximity to source of supply;
• Type of treatment;
• Effluent disposal method;
• Density of service area;
• Availability of grant funding to finance CIP;
• Age of system;
• Utility life cycle(e.g.,growth-oriented vs. mature);
• Level of service standards;or
• Administrative policies.
3-6
As shown on Table 3-10, the average water and wastewater system impact fees per ERU for the 15 governmental
entities selected for this comparison are$5,369 per ERU. Of the surveyed utilities,the City of Ocoee has the highest
combined water and wastewater fees at$9,551 per ERC. City of Winter Garden with a combined fee of$2,853 had
the lowest of the surveyed utilities. The proposed water and wastewater impact fees are slightly higher than similar
fees charged by the surveyed utilities.
$12,000
$10,000
$7,666
$7,664
$8,000
$6,000 Surveyed Average:$5,369.00
$4,000
$2,000
$0
e�f rt o¢ ell o�� a e°\Ia
a oJa cy t°
e `
o � ooUna �°� e °
L° o � � ` LL.�° a �J a�o
o moL \ms
& de;
o ° +�
o
a�O�oe e
r•Water Wastewater Neighboring Average
(Remainder of page intentionally left blank)
3-7
Page 1 of 1
Section 3
City of Clermont
Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis
List of Tables
Table Description
3-1 Summary of Water and Wastewater Fixed Assets
3-2 Distribution/Transmission Main Allocator- Water System
3-3 Collection/Transmission Main Allocator- Wastewater System
3-4 Summary of Capital Improvement Program
3-5 Allocation of Planned Water Capital Improvements
3-6 Allocation of Planned Wastewater Capital Improvements
3-7 Development of Water System Impact Fee
3-8 Development of Wastewater System Impact Fee
3-9 Proposed Impact Fees for Water and Wastewater Service
3-10 Comparison of Impact Fees for Water and Wastewater Service
Page I of 1
Table 3-1
City of Clermont
Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis
Summary of Water and Wastewater Fixed Assets I I I
Line Fixed Assets at Original Cost
No. Function Water Wastewater
Assets Included in the Impact Fee
1 Treatment Plant $25,196,445 $42,154,532
2 Transmission Lines[2][3] 9,883,592 6,348,551
3 Lift Stations 0 12,546,658
Total Embedded Costs Included
4 in the Impact Fee Analysis $35,080,037 $61,049,742
Assets Excluded from the Impact Fee
5 Meter Services $3,110,086 $0
6 Distribution/Collection Lines[2] [3] 13,128,447 11,790,166
7 Vehicles&Equipment 1,992,525 2,088,963
Total Embedded Costs Excluded
8 from the Impact Fee Analysis $18,231,057 $13,879,129
9 Total Fixed Assets $53,311,095 $74,928,870
10 Total System Assets $128,239,965
Footnotes:
[1] Estimated Assets as reported by the City as of September 30,2021.
[2] For the purposes of allocating reclaimed water resource costs,all costs associated with
reclaimed water transmission&distribution are reflected in the water assets. All
reclaimed water assets associated with treatment and storage remain in the
wastewater treatment costs.
[3] Based on the existing asset records of the City,information on specific
distribution and collection lines that should be excluded from impact fee
determination was not available. Therefore the following adjustments
were made to segregate the total transmission costs from the
distribution and collection related costs:
Fixed Assets at Original Cost
Water Wastewater
Transmission&Distribution/Collection System $23,012,039 $18,138,717
Percent Allocable to Back-bone Transmission[*] 42.9% 35.0%
Amount Allocable to Back-bone Transmission $9,883,592 $6,348,551
Amount Allocable to Distribution/Collection $13,128,447 $11,790,166
[*]The water and wastewater transmission system was estimated based on
mains greater than 8 inches in diameter as derived from Tables 3-2 and 3-3.
Page 1 of I
Table 3-2
City of Clermont
Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis
Distribution/Transmission Main Allocator-Water System
Weighted Allocation [1]
Line Total Percent
No. Size of Pipe(diameter) Length (ft.) of Total
Distribution Mains [2]
1 1" 0
2 1 1/2" 0
3 2" 146,630
4 4" 32,480
5 6" 2,890,266
6 811 3,197,416
7 Total Distribution 6,266,792 57.1%
Transmission Mains
8 10" 521,870
9 12" 2,409,264
10 16" 1,457,808
11 20" 239,440
12 24" 89,496
13 Total Transmission 4,717,878 42.9%
14 Total T/D Mains 10,984,670 100.0%
Footnotes:
[1] Amounts shown reflect the product of the linear miles of line
and each line size or diameter.
[2] Distribution System assumed to include all service lines less
than 10 inches in diameter.
Page 1 of 1
Table 3-3
City of Clermont
Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis
Collection/Transmission Main Allocator-Wastewater System
Gravitv Mains Force Mains Total Mains I 1]
Line Weighted Percent Weighted Percent Weighted Percent
No. Size of Pipe(diameter) Length(ft.in.) of Total Length(ft.in.) of Total Length(ft.in.) of Total
Collection Mains[2]
1 6" 16,020 0 16,020
2 8" 7,300,568 0 7,300,568
3 Total Collection Mains 7,316,588 88.66% 0 0.001. 7,316,588 63.5%
Transmission Mains
4 2" 0 10,588 10,588
5 3" 0 35,082 35,082
6 4" 0 50,024 50,024
7 6" 0 399,300 399,300
8 8" 0 381,544 381,544
9 W, 294,550 247,330 541,880
10 12" 261,108 890,664 1,151,772
11 15" 239,310 0 239,310
12 16" 3,808 356,944 360,752
13 18" 78,948 0 78,948
14 24" 0 419,780 419,780
15 30" 57,960 0 57,960
16 36" 312 218,280 218,592
17 42" 0 265,440 265,440
18 Total Transmission 935,996 11.34% 3,274,976 100.000/0 4,210,972 36.5%
19 Total Mains 8,252,584 100.00% 3,274,976 100.00% 11,527,560 100.08/0
Footnotes:
[1] Amounts shown reflect the product of the linear miles of line and each line size or diameter.
[2] Collection System assumed to include all service lines less than 10 inches in diameter.
rr
ell!
Fb-
Sao @. pk wa
w o
Q�
E a.
R Fn
s �
o i�'4�p'.88°1�088gag
oeooeooeeoe8 eoLS a 2S888��."-..88:oeoa�3000og H
R
� e
8 88888
pp Q y� ti
g L $ 8 000000eoeeoeoeeg o80800000eo8oboo�oo888888 W
r
8 8 8 eoeeoeeeeoeeeeeg e8eeoeeoeoe8e8eeeoe...H H
K
o ...............
g o E o o e o o e o 0 o a e 3 0 0 0 0 o e o 8$$$
9991
tggwt
=�Sfi .soc 'dJ'G8S88.°S_'o8w8'u'e.
Table 34
City of Clean ont Pw 2 42
Water and Waamater Impact Fee Aaaly tit
Summan of Capital lmorortmcol Prveraat
Lice Alloy on Projcd FiwWYear Eodi.w Septcffier30.
No. De ,V,.,o Water Wastewater 2012 _._202J _ 2024 2023 2026 2027 Total
46 Lill Stan-EI viol Rehab 0% 100%. d 0 80,000 30,DOO 50,000 50,000 230,OIt0
47 Replazmem vehlcka-Sewer 0% 100%. 0 100,000 299,475 525,000 73,000 119,000 1.116,475
48 Lift Station Pump Repent 0% 100% 455000 400,000 200,000 200,000 100,000 30,000 1,405,000
49 WM Side Gmssty Main Luvng 0% 1ow. 0 0 500,000 0 0 0 500,000
50 Public Semces Btdlding 0% 100% 0 377,800 0 0 0 0 377,800
51 Lamtal/Manhole Lining 0% 1W*/s 105,000 105,000 100,000 0 50,000 50,000 410,000
52 R'asttw-aler Treatmom Facility Expataion(4.0-6 5 MOD)-I of 4 0% 100% 0 3,000,000 17,600,000 7.130,000 0 0 27,730.000
53 Warms ter Treat Facility Expenswo(4.0-6,5 MOD)-2 of 4 IN IOO"6 0 3,000,000 16,000,000 0 0 0 19,000,000
54 Wastewater Tmtmem Facility Expenswn(4.0-6.5 MOD)-3 of 4 01A 100°/. 0 2000000 0 0 0 0 2,OW,000
55 W'utewatm Tree-Focday Lq wn(40-6.5 MOD)-4 or 0% 100% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
56 W-ewater Treatmam Facility Design R Carryover 09: 100%. 236,246 200.000 550,000 130,000 0 0 1,116,246
57 Scwc S.nem Camforwsrd 0% 100%. 375,163 0 0 0 0 0 375,163
58 lift Station Improvemena 0% 100%. 699,(W 475000 400,D00 400,000 350,000 350AN 2,674,000
59 Capnnl Outlay-Sear Sys(m OH. 1001/. 250,D00 0 0 0 0 0 250,000
60 Crpoa)Outlay-Egrupmcm UB 30000 0°. 100%/. 2.500 316,700 0 0 0 0 319,2M
61 Cap 0.1-Pm Svc Weld Way 01% 1OV/. 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 20,000
62 Cap Oul-Pro Svc 0% 1w/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
63 Cap Ora-Pm Svc Uril Reloc 0% 1ow. 0 100,0W 0 0 0 0 100,000
64 Cap Ow-Other)mp.oremem W. 1001% 0 1,000,000 1,670,000 0 0 0 2,670,000
65 Cap Out-Reel Wafer lmpmvern m 0% 100% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
66 EWRF Phase 11 0Y. 100% 0 0 0 0 0 23,367,000 23,367,000
67 Lifl SbUon EN Fora Maio 0% 100% 0 0 0 0 0 1,480,000 1,480,000
68 00rr Mim11-Wastewater Adjustmems 0% 100% SO SO SO SO SO S0 SO
69 Ongoing Wutcwattr Capnal Omtla) OSL 1003: SO S0 $50,000 S50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $200,000
70 TOTAL WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN S2,142,909 S11.074,500 $37,499.475 S8.535,000 S723,000 S25566,000 S85,540,884
71 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPRO%rEMF.NT PROGRAM $4,303,153 S16495"1 $44,990,845 S10,137,000 $15855W S71,523,000 S149535494
T.ble 3-1 Page I oft
C1ly.r ner...t
W.kr ud W.de-r I.rp.rt Fee A..ly.l.
All-M,of Plumed Wrer C.ph.l I.mroveax.q
2022-2027 Net Amami Coal Nlocalio. EdadrO-N.edoo.l C-kPr3 Fun -FmW.1Ctcp-
Lice b"loutd F.Fun.e Stp*Od Storage,Ampmg Supply and ftnW.Pumpwg
No. P+jWADwcriptiw Tfpe Capital Ccet 111 Adpolto nu 121 Expmditues Exi.iiig Alt- Trt wow &T,,u roan Tmtme.l aTtmmitrio.
W.oer sy.t..
C..Iml I®nrr.e.l Pr.cam Ill
I Replacev.ot VehiclsWaw Other S4w.500 (94901" 50 IODDO% OAD% s0 SO SO 50
2 Al-m,Waw South Lake Waw hutinow Od- 5M.00D (SWAM 0 IOOAD% OD0% 0 0 0 0
3 EAsl Water Syrem looping Dca R Coml Trm umo. 1,550,DW (775A00) TMIM OAO% IOOAO% 0 0 0 775ADO
4 Wet W.w Sy.-lmptrvetnats De.A Cost T-,..im 1,350,000 (675AOD) 67SAM OAO% IOOAO% 0 0 0 67S,000
5 Lower Fbndi..Agtef.We➢t C-"(orw.td Tr-,,I 7,641370 0 7.641,370 IODAD% O.OD% 7,641,M 0 0 0
6 1-,Fbfidim Aquif.W.➢-D-p B C.ryf d Tre.menl 436,706 0 436.- 100.00% O.OD% 436,706 0 0 0
7 W.Iar Sy-SoenaW.Pb,-3 Trmsml.tm 1,228,1" (190.444) 337,754 100.00% ODD% D 377,7x 0 0
8 1.1-LA.Road Mei.Up.ixi.g k Cutyfonnrd Ttmmis.w. 0 0 0 100.00% O.OD% 0 0 0 0
9 Public Servim.Hula ug Treatmrnl 462,481 (362,481) 0 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0
1O Jns oh L I.Rod Mai.Up.a.µ Dig. Tr.w.i..iw 0 0 0 IODAO% O.OD% 0 0 0 0
11 W.w M.i.C.rryf--.d ltmami- 362,481 0 362,491 100." ODO% 0 362,401 0 0
l2 C.pilal 0.1by-Plofe.aoal S.rvtcea abler 575,OOD (575A00) 0 1001M OAD% 0 0 0 0
13 C.piu)Ou d y-Pmfs.to..l Services For All W.w Clh. 100,000 OOMM) 0 100.0D% Oam D 0 0 0
14 C.pit.l Oud.),Equipmem Other 1.563,000 (1363ADo) 0 100.00% O.OD% 0 0 0 0
m rw.15 Cap O -Cat•yford RcWVaNe Oth. 100.491 (100.491) 0 IOODO% O.OD% 0 0 0 0
16 Cap OuI,Wsw Sy.l.m UTRek.ale Tr.tan;..i- 10,963 (10.963) 0 IOO.OD% 0100% 0 0 0 0
17 C.p� N-( yf•rw"Rduk WM King Ridge Trmmissi- 1,450 (1,450) 0 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0
18 Gp Out South Labe C.ameetm.LIZ RCW Mem Other 87,400 (97,400) 0 100.00% OAO% 0 0 0 0
19 Cap OW-Plo Svc Webs W.y-S.qp We➢Irr Treasmiseion I00,000 0 100,0D0 100.OD% ODO% 0 IOOA00 0 0
20 C.p Out•W.H.U.uses Pumps 33201 Ttatmevt 100." (loom 0 300A0% OA0% 0 0 0 0
21 C.p Out-R.e1 Wu Rene T..k 33203 T-c,al 45,OD0 (45.000) 0 100.OD% OAO% 0 0 0 0
22 CpQa Pm Ut Relocalo-Hanwod Muth Other 200,000 PODAOD) 0 10000% 0.00% 0 0 0 0
23 Cap Out.ProS.c CDHO F(y17 38123 (Rh. 12,5W (12,M0) 0 100A0% O.OD% 0 0 0 0
24 C.p 0.Other Impro-o' 00w 750,000 (750,00D) 0 IOOAO% O.OD% 0 0 0 D
25 C.p Out-Relocat.J bm-d M" Otb. 1.935,000 (1 935AOD) 0 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0
26 Johw L.k,Rod Exte.sio.l Redonda=loop T-L.aioo 3330.000 4310,918) 3.319A•2 10090% ODO% D 3319JM 0 0
27 Hat.00d M..h Rod Impr.nmmts Ttttm.i>i- 210,000 0 210.000 WOOD% ODO% 0 210im 0 0
28 Fl-i-dahip Rod l.povm- Trmami"- 2.9WA00 0 2,940AW 100.00% O.OD% 0 2,940,000 0 0
29 Ew Tang Hwy 50 Impry smc.tr Trmsmiau.. 2,624,000 0 2,62AAOD 100.00% 0.00% 0 2,624A00 0 D
30 S-bnt Lme WTP HSP Rephcemc.t Ttome.l 1,800,000 (IAD,000) 0 ID0.00% OAO% 0 0 0 0
31 Fu u W M Treemem 16.200AO0 0 16.2WAW 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 16,200y000 0
32 ILtk Road Exlraaio. Tnnsmi.ioo 2,480,000 0 3,480,000 1901" OAD% 0 3,4O1)1.0 0 0
33 Beth Tern Um, Tr.tssml.ion 1,563.000 0 1,563,000 100.0D% D.OD% 0 1363A00 0 0
34 Beu L.go I- Tr.t»mivioo 1,312,000 0 1312AOO 100.00% 0.00% 0 1312AM 0 0
35 SR 50&n.-1.Lary -h.xmi si.. 4,830.000 0 4,830AO0 IDOAO% O.OD% 0 4,LMA0 0 0
36 C-.l Alta Carus 01 T-imon 3,400,000 0 3,400A00 IDOAO% O.OD% 0 3.40DAO0 0 0
37 Sl.bunl Loa Coi-cmr ()'her 417,000 (417,000) 0 100.00% O.OD% 0 0 0 0
38 EWRF Pw glmpoaemnus Trtmtmis- 106.000 0 106.000 100.OD% 0.W% 0 106,ODD 0 0
39 "SIPS l.tp.owa m I T-toi-, 380,0011 0 38D.ODO 100.00% ODO% 380,000 0 0 0
40 HSPS loryrmsm U 11 Tre.mem 390,000 0 39DJM 100.00% 0.00% 380.000 0 0 0
41 Fu-S-W and Ptapun4 Staboo T--t 2320,ODO 0 2320,000 100.00% O.OD% 2,320A00 0 0 0
42 Other Ma-11mmus Wslm Adjuatmmb Olhv SO 30 $0 100.00% O.OD% 0 0 0 0
43 Ongoing W.w Capital outlay Outer S200,000 (S200,000) SO IOO.OD% 0.00% 0 0 0 0
44 Total W.ter Sy.te. S63,994,6M ($II602,207) S52392,393 S11,158AM 323".317 $16,200A00 SIASO,OOD
45 Red.lmed W.-Pro)e.fa
Y C'aplt•I Improv<mr.r Protcr.m Ill
7.bk 3-3 P.#c 2.(2
Ctty of Cleran.t
W.W red W..I.ar.kr Impact Far A.aly.lc
Alk—tmnof Ph JW.kr C.ott'l]JAPM amaata_
2022-2027 Na Amount Con All—.- Exiting-F—UG lC.k.on Fume-Ftmctio..l C..y
Li.. E tmWW Fm F.— Supply and Stoms.,Pumput/ SDply-d SWW.pt®pms
N.. hu),tDe.aiption Tt lx C.piml C"fll Adiurtm.m.121 Fxi—dA—, Eximins FuMu Tl.W-1 AT—ieim TMO-0 RTrmmi.—
�7 Blaut _— — --. $0 so $0 100.0031 0.00% s0 m s0 s0
48 Tebl Skul.lm.d W.w Syrian so s0 so so f0 so _s0
49 Ta.I C.pI1.1PnJanta 563,994,600 (511,602,207) 532392393 SILISS076 S233H317 f1620D,000 S1/30.000
Fuolml..
11) Amotmts dai-d from T.bk 3A.
f21 Adjtmm.nk(or--I"tepl.a--pm.cb.
T.ble 3-6 Fqc 1 al
City of Cbrmw
w.1er..d wb'm-ttr imp.et Fee Aedyde
AReolb.d Fleoetl W.dm kr C-U Lm.vemmb
2022-2027 NetAooum Coot Alloea6m E-101-Ftmd)oml Creotay Fm1.e-F-b wCewn%
Lbw Fanmbd F.Fur" Trt b.adJ 73aaoeW
No. ProPd Deeviwa. Tree CVbI CM III Adimmnu 121 Esoalldin.ee Fadeunt Floe Dif-) Tma imim Disooal Tmciitdat
w.1e..rrneleew
1 Lill Swu.ot wa well Limy Te.®.wm 2200AM ($200.000) 50 100.00% 000% SO m !0 SO
2 1.01 Sbum Ek mml ReMb T- 230A00 (230,000) 0 I OOAO% 0.00% 0 0 0 0
3 RMIsmaeet Ve.IwSft- Oda 1,116,473 (1.114475) 0 100'OVA 000% 0 0 0 0
e LA Swum Fmp Repl.oemmt T3- 1.405.000 (1.eDS,000) 0 100A0% 0.00% 0 0 0 0
5 W.0 yids Gm ty W-Litw,y T3.ee®av 500.000 (500,000) 0 100AD14 O.OD% 0 0 0
Pas, B.B 0
6 F Se m Tmemod 377.y00 (377.11M 0 IOO.OD% 0.ao% 0 0 0 0
7 LNerd OdlMok l� Tam1t tio0 410.000 (410.0DO) 0 100 W% 000% 0 0 0 0
B Waewwter Ts-w m FooftE.pomm(4.0.6,5 MGD)-Id4 Tia.eocl 27,730,000 0 27,730.000 O.OD% 10O0D% 0 0 27,7m000 0
9 Wmlewe Tmtmad Fwdldy Ety. (4.0.6.5 MOD)-2 (4 Tlmmmot 19,000,000 0 190OOAM OAO% 10O0D% 0 0 191D00,000 0
10 Wadw wTleemem Fmbly E.p.otdm(4.0.&S MOD)-3d1 Tled.W 3MNODO (2A00.000) 0 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0
11 W.de..wT..mwd F.duty (e.0-6,5 MOD)-4 d4 Trtamml 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% 0 0 0 0
12 Wul-Im Truman Fmhryl Daen dl C7gvm T-k w 1.116,246 0 1.116.246 0.00% ICO.00% 0 0 I,LI6,M6 0
13 &.er Syotem C.rtyfaw.ld Tmmerd 375,163 (375,163) 0 100.001A 0.00% 0 0 0 0
le UA%ti.n(mpor mem Tim 2A74A00 (2,674,000) 0 )OOAD% 0.00% 0 0 0 0
IS C-P"Odby-Saws&/A- O4v 250A00 (250.000) 0 100.00% MOD% 0 0 0 0
16 Cepibl Ootwy-Pgbp.m UB 30000 O11- 319,200 (319,20D) 0 1OD"% 0.00% 0 0 0 0
17 Cmp Od ec-Pm S Welm Wry Tnm..W- 20A00 (20.000) 0 100.00% O.OD% 0 0 0 0
IS C.p Od-Pm Svc Od. 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0
19 aw Om-P.Svc LN Re1oc Tr.omrav 100,000 (100,000) 0 100,M 0.0014 0 0 0 0
20 Ctp Od 01balmpowmct OM 2670.000 (21670,0D0) 0 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0
21 C p a-R d Wam l.prmmml Timdwlm 0 0 0 100.00-A 0.00% 0 0 0 0
22 EWRF Fb-13 Tmbad 23,367A00 0 23,367p00 0.00% IOOOD% 0 0 23J67,0D0 0
23 Lill Swum EOe Forte Wi. Tr.®fm I.650,000 (9m 667) e93,333 100.00% 0.00% 0 493.333 0 0
24 Oma Micafl . W.ye..prt A4UVMmb Omer SO 50 SO 100.00% MOM 0 0 0 0
25 Ow"wmlwv.te.ev"Odby Omer S200AOD (S200,00O) m 100.00% 0.00% 0 0 0 0
26 T.blwmbwceryyeeem 585,550.554 (513.04,3M) $71,706,579 SO $903,333 $7),213,2d6 m
27 CMLU§Md 3pkM
29 Elk SO SO 50 IOD.00% O.OD% SD SO So SO
29 131ck 0 0 0 100.00% O.OD% 0 0 0 0
30 r.ww.dewWeey.bm So 5D SD SO SD So SO
31 Tebl C.pNd N.jmb fMSq,M (513AM3 AM) 371.706,579 SD Se93333 1.71320 SO
Foa6ma:
[l] Amad.deivd Gan Tubb 3-4
12) Aammem fa rmevl.ed repl.rn.m a y a Coded 9mpde
Page 1 of 4
Table 3-7
City of Clermont
Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis
Development of Water System Impact Fee
Line
No. Description Amount
Total Estimated Cost of Existing& Future Water Production
and Treatment Facilities:
1 Cost of Existing Facilities [1] $25,196,445
2 Additional Costs Capitalized-CIP[2] 11,158,076
3 Less Receipt of Grant Funds[3] (940,608)
4 Subtotal Water Production and Treatment Facilities $35,413,913
5 Existing Capacity of Plant Facilities(MGD)(ADF) [4] 12.193
6 Existing Average Daily Flow(MGD)(ADF)[5] 7.818
7 ERC Factor-(GPD)(ADF)[6] 220.0
8 Estimated ERUs Permitted to be Served by Future Facilities 55,423
9 Percent of Capacity Available for Growth 35.88%
10 Allocation of Existing& Future Facilities to Incremental Growth $12,706,952
11 Rate per ERU of Treatment Facilities $638.98
12 Additional Borrowing Costs-Existing[7] $631,015
13 Estimated ERUs Permitted to be Served by Future Facilities 55,423
14 Percent of Capacity Available for Growth 35.88%
15 Estimated Remaining ERUs Permitted to be Served by Future Facilities 19,886
16 Additional Borrowing Costs-Existing[7] $631,015
17 Estimated Remaining ERUs Permitted to be Served by Future Facilities 19,886
18 Additional Borrowing Costs-Per Future ERU $31.73
19 Rate per ERU of Treatment Facilities and Borrowing Costs $670.71
Total Estimated Cost of Additional Water Production
and Treatment Facilities:
20 Additional Costs Capitalized-C1P [8] $16,200,000
21 Less Receipt of Grant Funds [3] 0
22 Cost of Additional Water Production/Treatment Facilities $16,200,000
23 New Plant Capacity(MGD)(ADF)[9] 5.163
24 Estimated ERCs to be Served by Additional Facilities 23,468.00
25 Rate per ERC Associated with Additional Facilities $690.30
26 Rate per ERC Allocable to Water Production/Treatment Facilities $681.31
Page 2 of 4
Table 3-7
City of Clermont
Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis
Development of Water System Impact Fee
Line
No. Description Amount
Primary Transmission System:
27 Existing Facilities [8] $9,883,592
28 Additional Costs Capitalized-CIP[10] 25,034,317
29 Less Receipt of Grant Funds [4] (623,446)
30 Total Primary Transmission Facility Costs $34,294,463
31 Total Estimated ERUs served by Transmission Facilities [11] 55,423
32 Net Rate per ERU of Primary Transmission Facilities $618.78
33 Total Combined Rate per ERU After Rate Adjustment $1,300.09
34 Rounded Rate per ERU $1,300.00
35 Cost Per Gallon $5.909
ADF=Average Daily Flow
MDF=Maximum Daily Flow
ERU=Equivalent Residential Unit
GPD=Gallons per Day
Footnotes continued on the following page.
Page 3 of 4
Table 3-7
City of Clermont
Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis
Development of Water System Impact Fee
Footnotes:
[1] Amount based on Table 3-1 and reflects water production and
treatment assets currently in service.
[2] Amount derived from Table 3-5 and reflects the planned upgrades to the
existing water production and treatment facilities.
[3] Total cost of facilities is reduced by grants and other outside funding sources,
if any,as provided by the City.
[4] Amount reflects the design capacity of the existing facilities expressed on an average
daily flow basis(ADF)estimated as follows:
Plant Capacity
East Side
Sunburst Lane WTP-MGD(MDF) 9.500
Greater Hills WTP-MGD(MDF) 8.842
Sub-total East Side-MGD(MDF) 18.342
_West Side
Fourth Street Well-MGD(MDF) 1.080
Grand Highway Well -MGD(MDF) 2.304
Sub-total West Side-MGD(MDF) 3.384
Total Existing Water Treatment Capacity-MDG(MDF) 21.726
Maximum Historical Five-Year Average(FY 2017 -2022)Peak to Average Ratio 1.78
Water Treatment Capacity- MDG(ADF) 12.193
[5] Amount estimated based on discussions from staff and actual water production
data for Fiscal Year 2022.
[6] Amount reflects the City's current level of service for each ERU,
Equivalent Residential Connection,on an average daily flow basis.
[7] Amount reflects interest costs associated with the issuance of existing debt
as derived as follows:
Total Financing Costs-Series 2017 Water and Sewer Bonds $2,111,831
Percent Allocable to Water System 30%
Amount Allocable to Water System $631,015
Page 4 of 4
Table 3-7
City of Clermont
Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis
Development of Water Svstem Impact Fee
Footnotes:
[8] Amount based on Table 3-1 and reflects existing water transmission
assets currently in service.
[9] Amount reflects the design capacity of the future plant expansion expressed on an
average daily flow basis(ADF)estimated as follows:
Plant Capacity
Total Future Water Treatment Capacity-MDG(MDF) 9.200
Maximum Historical Five-Year Average(FY 2017 -2022)Peak to Average Ratio 1.78
Future Water Treatment Capacity-MDG(ADF) 5.163
[10] Amount derived from Table 3-5 and reflects the recognized upgrades to the
water transmission system.
[11] Amount assumes transmission capacity is consistent with the existing and
estimated future water treatment capacity.
Pagel of 4
Table 3-8
City of Clermont
Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis
Development of Wastewater System Impact Fee
Line
No. Description Amount
Total Estimated Cost of Existing& Future Wastewater
Treatment& Disposal Facilities:
1 Cost of Existing&Future Facilities [1] $42,154,532
2 Additional Costs Capitalized-CIP [2] 0
3 Less Receipt of Grant Funds [3] (1,664,926)
4 Subtotal Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities $40,489,606
5 Future Plant Capacity(MGD) (AADF) [4] 4.000
6 Projected Average Daily Flow (MGD) (AADF) [5] 3.193
7 ERC Factor-(GPD) (ADF) [6] 220.0
8 Estimated ERUs to be Served by Facilities 18,182
9 Percent Remaining Capacity of Facilities 20.18%
10 Allocation of Existing&Future Facilities to Incremental Growth $8,168,778
11 Rate per ERU of Treatment Facilities $2,226.93
12 Additional Borrowing Costs-Existing System [7] $1,121,805
13 Estimated ERUs Permitted to be Served by Facilities 18,182
14 Percent of Capacity Available for Growth 20.18%
15 Estimated Remaining ERUs Permitted to be Served by Facilities 3,668
16 Additional Borrowing Costs -Existing System [7] $1,121,805
17 Estimated Remaining ERUs Permitted to be Served by Facilities 3,668
18 Additional Borrowing Costs -Per Future ERU $305.82
19 Rate per ERC Associated with Existing&Future Facilities $2,532.75
Total Estimated Cost of Additional Wastewater
Treatment& Disposal Facilities:
20 Additional Costs Capitalized-CIP [8] $71,213,246
21 Less Receipt of Grant Funds [3] 0
22 Cost of Additional Wastewater Treatment Facilities $71,213,246
Page 2 of 4
Table 3-8
City of Clermont
Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis
Development of Wastewater System Impact Fee
Line
No. Description Amount
23 New Plant Capacity-First Increment(MGD) (AADF) [9] 2.500
24 New Plant Capacity- Second Inrement(MGD) (AADF) [9] 2.500
25 New Plant Capacity(MGD) (AADF) [9] 5.000
26 Estimated ERUs to be Served by Additional Facilities 22,727
27 Rate per ERU Associated with Additional Facilities $3,133.42
28 Additional Borrowing Costs- Expansion [7] $12,771,600
29 Estimated Remaining ERUs Permitted to be Served by Future Facilities 11,364
30 Additional Borrowing Costs -Per Future ERU $1,123.90
31 Rate per ERC Associated with Future Facilities $4,257.32
32 Rate per ERU Allocable to Wastewater Treatment Facilities $4,173.84
Primary Transmission System and Pump Stations:
33 Existing Facilities [10] $18,895,209
34 Additional Costs Capitalized-C1P [11] 493,333
35 Less Receipt of Grant Funds [4] 0
36 Total Primary Transmission Facility Costs $19,388,543
37 Estimated ERUs Served by Existing Facilities 18,182
38 Estimated Future ERUs served by Collection Facilities [12] 11,364
39 Total Estimated ERUs served by Collection Facilities 29,546
40 Net Rate per ERU of Primary Transmission Facilities $656.22
41 Total Combined Rate per ERU After Rate Adjustment $4,830.06
42 Rounded Rate per ERU $4,830.00
43 Cost Per Gallon $21.955
MDF=Maximum Daily Flow
ADF =Average Daily Flow
ERU=Equivalent Residential Unit
GPD=Gallons per Day
Footnotes continued on the following page.
Page 3 of 4
Table 3-8
City of Clermont
Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis
Development of Wastewater System Impact Fee
Footnotes:
[1] Amount based on Table 3-1 and reflects wastewater treatment
assets currently in service.
[2] Amount derived from Table 3-6 and reflects the planned upgrades to the
existing wastewater treatment facilities.
[3] Total cost of facilities is reduced by grants and other outside funding sources,
if any, as provided by the City.
[4] Amount reflects the design capacity of the expanded facilities(up to 8.0 MGD) on
an annual average daily flow basis (AADF).
[5] Amount estimated based on discussions from staff and actual treatment flow
data for Fiscal Year 2022.
[6] Amount reflects the City's current level of service for each ERU,
Equivalent Residential Connection, on an average daily flow basis.
[7] Amount reflects interest costs associated with the issuance of existing debt
as derived as follows:
Total Financing Costs- Series 2017 Water and Sewer Bonds $2,111,831
Percent Allocable to Wastewater System 53%
Amount Allocable to Wastewater System $1,121,805
Total Financing Costs-Future Debt for 2023 Plant Expansion $12,771,600
Percent Allocable to Wastewater System 100%
Amount Allocable to Wastewater System $12,771,600
Amount Allocable to Wastewater System $13,893,405
[8] Amount derived from Table 3-6 and reflects expansion related additions to the
wastewater treatment facilities.
[9] Amount as provided by City staff which reflects the planned expansion capacity
expressed on annual average daily flow basis.
Page 4 of 4
Table 3-8
City of Clermont
Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis
Development of Wastewater System Impact Fee
Footnotes:
[10] Amount based on Table 3-1 and reflects existing wastewater transmission
and pump station assets currently in service.
[11] Amount derived from Table 3-6 and reflects the recognized upgrades to the
wastewater transmission system and pump stations.
[12] Amount assumes transmission capacity is consistent with the existing wastewater
treatment capacity and the first increment of additional future capacity or 6.5
MGD(AADF). This was assumed because the CIP did not include significant
investment in future transmission infrastructure that would correspond to the full
Page 1 of t
Table 3-9
City of Clermont
Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis
Proposed Impact Fees for Water and Wastewater Service
Water Impact Fees Wastewater Impact Fees
Line Service Amount Service Amount Total Impact
No. Description Level Charged Level( d) Charged Fees Charged
I Existing Impact Fee per Gallon $6.098 $21.532 $27.630
2 Proposed Impact Fee per Gallon $5.909 $21.955 $27.864
3 Increase(Decrease)-$ ($0.189) $0.423 $0.234
4 Increase(Decrease)-% -3.1% 2.0% 0.8%
Single FamilN(Except All-Adult Communities(
5 All Meters[1] 480 $2,836 220 $4,830 $7,666
(Nalified All-Adult Cvmmunity
6 Up to 3 bedrooms-All Meters[1] 322 $1,900 147 $3,236 $5,136
7 4 or more bedrooms-All Meters[1) 480 $2,836 220 $4,830 $7,666
Multi-famik
8 Per Unit[2] 154 $910 154 $3,381 $4,291
Commercial 121
9 3/4"Meter 220 $1,300 220 $4,830 $6,130
10 1"Meter 550 $3,250 550 $12,075 $15,325
11 1.5"Meter 1,100 $6,500 1,100 $24,150 $30,650
12 2"Meter 1,760 $10,400 1,760 $38,640 $49,040
13 3"Meter 3,300 $19,500 3,300 $72,450 $91,950
14 4"Meter 5,500 $32,500 5,500 $120,750 $153,250
15 6"Meter 11,000 $65,000 11,000 $241,500 $306,500
16 8"Meter 17,600 $104,000 17,600 $386,400 $490,400
17 10"Meter 25,300 $149,500 25,300 $555,450 $704,950
Footnotes:
[1] The proposed water fee includes an allowance for irrigation use;therefore,no fee is required when a separate irrigation meter is issued.
[2] Amounts for the water fee do not include an allowance for irrigation use. Based on discussions with City staff,the City generally
requires that a well be constructed for common area irrigation. To the extent a separate meter is issued,a second water impact fee
should be collected based on the meter size. No additional wastewater impact fee is collected for the 2nd meter used for
irrigation purposes.
Page 1 of 1
Table 3-10
City of Clermont
Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Analysis
Comparison of Impact Fees for Water and Wastewater Service I11
Line Residential 5/8"x 3/4"Meter
No. Description Water Wastewater Combined
City of Clermont
1 City of Clermont-Existing $2,927 $4,737 $7,664
2 City of Clermont-Proposed 2,836 4,830 7,666
Other Florida Utilities:
3 City of Apopka $1,276 $4,775 $6,051
4 City of Edgewater 1,741 2,634 4,375
5 City of Eustis 854 2,668 3,522
6 Toho Water Authority(Kissimmee System) 2,415 3,450 5,865
7 City of Lakeland 1,050 1,916 2,966
8 City of Lake Mary 1,010 3,610 4,620
9 City of Lake Wales 2,561 3,247 5,809
10 City of Leesburg 1,175 2,778 3,953
11 City of Minneola 2,429 4,600 7,029
12 City of Mount Dora 1,340 4,215 5,555
13 City of Ocoee 2,408 7,143 9,551
14 City of St.Cloud 3,409 3,780 7,189
15 City of Tavares 1,849 3,475 5,324
16 City of Winter Garden 1,086 1,767 2,853
17 City of Winter Haven 1,670 4,197 5,866
18 Other Utilities'Average $1,752 $3,617 $5,369
Footnotes:
[1] Unless otherwise noted,amounts shown reflect residential rates in effect March 2023 and are exclusive of taxes or
franchise fees,if any,and reflect rates charged for inside the city service. All rates are as reported by the respective
utility. This comparison is intended to show comparable charges for similar service for comparison purposes only
and is not intended to be a complete listing of all rates and charges offered by each listed utility.
SECTION 4 -- POLICE SERVICES IMPACT FEE
General
This section provides a discussion of the development and design of the impact fee for police services. Included in
this section is a discussion of the level of service requirements, capital costs included in the fee determination, and
the design of the impact fee for police services to be applied to new growth within the City.
Level of Service Requirements
In the evaluation of the capital facility needs for providing municipal services such as police protection, a level of
service("LOS")standard should be developed. Pursuant to Section 163.3164,Florida Statutes,the"level of service"
means an indicator of the extent or degrees of service provided by,or proposed to be provided by,a facility based on
and related to the operational characteristics of the facility. Level of service shall indicate the capacity per unit of
demand for each public facility or service.Essentially,the level of service standards are established in order to ensure
that adequate facility capacity will be provided for future development and for purposes of issuing development
orders or permits,pursuant to Section 163.3202(2)(g)of the Florida Statutes.As further stated in the Administrative
Code,each local government shall establish a LOS standard for each public facility located within the boundary for
which such local government has authority to issue development orders or permits. Such LOS standards are set for
each individual facility or facility type and not on a system-wide basis.
Based on information provided by the City's Police Department, there currently are 9 civilian and administrative
positions and 92 patrols officers to serve a total population of 46,655 permanent residents as shown in Table 4-1.The
current level of service is 1.97 full-time sworn officers per 1,000 population served. The City has plans to staff 7
additional officers per year through 2027 to improve and enhance the level of service being provided to the
community. The future level of service in 2027 will be 2.27 sworn officers per 1,000 population served.As the City
has included the costs to hire these additional officers in the Capital Improvements Plan and the operating budget,it
is fair to use the LOS of 2.27 in the projection of costs in 2027. The City's level of service is comparable with police
staffing guidelines as published by state and national law enforcement agencies as follows:
• The Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Uniform Crime Report that indicated an
average achieved standard of 2.50 police officers and support personnel per 1,000 inhabitants for population
areas in the Southern United States.
• The Florida Department of Law Enforcement recognizes a state average of 2.33 officers per 1,000 population
for police departments.
(Remainder of page intentionally left blank)
4-1
Existing Police Assets
In the development of the fee,the original costs of the existing assets and any grant funding or contributions towards
those assets were considered.The City's existing assets are categorized by major type and are summarized below.
PoliceInventory of City
Allocation to
Description Actual Costs Existing Units Allocated Costs
Machinery and Equipment $1,499,904 0.0% $0
Major Vehicles&Vehicle Related Equipment 3,834,265 100.0% ! 3,834,265
Other Capital Equipment and Facilities 8,329,308 100.0% 8,329,308
Sub Total $13,663,478 89.0% $12,163,573
Retirement Adjustments/Grants $0 100.0% $0
Net Future City Investments in Police Assets $13,663,478 89.0% $12,163,673
[1) Amounts as provided by City staff and are shown on Appendix 2 and summarized on Table 4-2.
As shown above, of the$13.7 million in police assets, $12.2 million is included in the calculation of the impact fee.
Additionally,based on information provided by the City, the department has received no grant funding and capital
contributions which could offset the capital costs included in the proposed impact fees.
Capital Improvement Requirements
In the development of the proposed fee,the following capital improvement requirements were provided by the City.
Along with the City's existing investment in police assets,these capital requirements are anticipated and designed to
maintain the department's ability to provide service to the City's buildout population level and fulfill the identified
level of service standards.The City's capital requirements are categorized by type of expenditure and are summarized
below.
(Remainder of page intentionally left blank)
4-2
Projected Future City Investment in Police Department
Total Capital
Description Improvements Adjustments Adjusted Total
Replacement Vehicles $2,832,000 ($2,832,000) $0
Seven New Marked Police Vehicles for Seven New Patrol Officers 2,492,000 0 2,492,000
Laptops to Equip Seven New Police Officers 74,400 (74,400) 0
Seven Tasers to Equip Seven New Police Officers 67,400 (67,400) 0
Body Camera Systems to Equip Seven New Police Officers 67,800 (67,800) 0
AEDs to Equip Seven New Police Vehicles 65,100 (65,100) 0
Ballistic Shields to Equip Seven New Police Officers 65,500 (65,500) 0
Radios to Equip Seven New Police Officers 195,000 (1951060) 0
BEARCAT Armored Rescue Vehicle 275,000 0 275,000
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles 100,000 (100,000) 0
FARO Crime Scene Mapping Software Program 75,000 (75.000) 0
Mobile Command Vehicle 4150,000 0 450,000
Automated License Plate Reader 0 0 0
Public Safety Training Facility Demuck 3$2,500 0 362,500
Public Safety Training Facility Design 100,000 0 100,000
Public Safety Training Facility Construction 2,000,000 0 2,000,000
Public Safety Training Facility Equipment 200,000 (200,000) 0
Police Sub-Station(Wellness Way) 1,585,000 0 1,585,666
Net Future City Investments in Pollce Assets $11,006,700 ($3,742,200) $7,264,500
[1) Amounts as provided by City staff and are shown on Table 4-3.
As can be seen above, the City anticipates spending$7.3 million in order to further develop and upgrade the police
assets and facilities to provide the desired level of service to the City as it grows through 2027. This amount is net of
adjustments associated with replacement related capital projects as shown on Table 4-3.
Design of Police Services Impact Fee
The method used to determine the police services impact fee is a combination of the improvements-driven method
and buy-in method as the recoupment of a portion of existing investments availability to serve new growth and the
costs associated with adding additional capacity to service the City's future needs are recognized. This method was
based upon a four-step process. Table 4-5 helps to illustrate the results of the approach. The following is a brief
description of the method used in this study.
• Development of Total Capital Need— Based on population projections, level of service standards, and
allocated incremental capital costs per patrol officer. This amount is the total allocated capital cost to serve
the projected population growth.
• Allocation of Base Capital Costs to Customer Classes—This step allocates the base capital costs,the reserved
service capacity allocable to all customer classes irrespective of call demand. The base costs are calculated
on a per person basis and then allocated between residential and non-residential land-uses based on
"functional population"estimates.
4-3
• Avocation of Variable Costs to Customer Classes—This step allocates the remaining capital costs between
the resident and non-residential land-uses based upon call demand. Therefore, some classes of land-use,
which may incur few or no service calls,will carry a lower cost than other high-demand sectors such as retail.
• Calculation of Cost per Equivalent Impact Fee Unit— Once the allocated base and variable costs are
identified per land-use,they are summarized and presented as a unit of measure basis;per dwelling unit,per
1,000 square feet,per bed,or per room. Table 4-5 provides a detailed listing of the proposed impact fees and
their appropriate land-use and measures.
POLICE SERVICES IMPACT FEE ASSUMPTIONS
The development of the police services impact fees required several assumptions.The major assumptions used in the
development of the proposed impact fees are as follows:
In the development of the capital costs to serve growth, the total existing and projected capital costs of
providing police services were developed as described previously based on existing asset records and
proposed capital expenditures through 2027. The total existing and projected investment of$18.0 million
was the cost basis used in the development of the fees.
In the development of the capital costs,it was assumed that the enhanced level of service be achieved by the
City by the end of the forecast period. This level of service includes only the amount of full-time patrol
officers to serve the general population of the City.As previously mentioned, the level of service assumed in
this study is 2.27 full-time patrol officers per 1,000 of population.
The estimated capital base costs or reserved service capacity,allocable to all customer classes were allocated
between the residential and non-residential customer classes based on "functional population" estimates.
The concept of functional population is incorporated in order to spread capital costs more equitably between
residential and non-residential land-uses. Businesses place demands on police services in the same manner
as residents do,and it is equitable to spread these costs based on the average number of people expected to
be present. For the residential uses, the allocation is calculated per resident based on the average amount of
time spent at the residence. The resident's remaining time is then allocated as either an employee and/or
visitor to the remaining non-residential classes as determined using traffic generations, estimated
employment data,and operational details.The net result is the total number of person hours per location as
derived from Table 2-3 in Section 2. The base costs are calculated on a per person basis and then applied to
the residential and non-residential land-uses based upon the respective functional population coefficient.
The estimated variable capital cost of providing for a full-time patrol officer was allocated between the
residential and non-residential customer classifications based on the estimated percentage of service calls
made by the Police Department per class.
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Based on the above-referenced assumptions, the allocated capital facilities, and the population and land use
projections of the City, the police services impact fees for the residential and non-residential customer classifications
were developed.As shown in Table 4-5 at the end of this section,the cost per equivalent impact fee unit by customer
classification was determined. The following summarizes the proposed changes to the residential police protection
impact fees:
4-4
ProposedExisting and ..
Description Unit of Measure Existing Proposed
Residential Dwelling Unit $526.00 $580.00
Non-Residential:
Industrial/Warehousing 1,000 Sq.Ft. $85.00 $28.00
Institutional 1,000 Sq.Ft. N/A 64.00
Hotel/Motel Rooms 792.00 1,030.00
Office Buildings 1,000 Sq.Ft. 337.00 262.00
Retail 1,000 Sq.Ft. 1,085.00 789.00
Assisted Living Facility("ALF") Bed 460.00 264.00
Taking into account the methodology used for the determination of the fee and the estimates associated with
determining the police capital needs of the City, it is concluded that the proposed impact fees are reasonable. It
should be noted that in the development of the fee per equivalent impact fee unit, that no credits associated with
developer land dedication or other similar activities have been recognized.Also,it should be noted that the proposed
incremental capital improvements are stated in Fiscal Year 2023 dollars and do not include any inflationary
allowances.
To meet the City's needs in terms of providing the necessary police related capital improvements required by growth,
the City should increase the fees to the calculated amount as demonstrated on the tables above. As discussed in the
Executive Summary, there are several factors causing an extraordinary circumstance for the City including recent
significant capital cost increases associated with inflation in addition to the need for capital improvements based on
the significant increase in population growth experienced by the City historical and projected going forwards.
In the development of the cost per equivalent impact fee unit, it was determined that the rate should be applied on a
"per dwelling unit"basis for the residential class and primarily on a"per square footage"of commercial development
for the non-residential class.As shown in Table 4-5,some non-residential land-uses are measured by units other than
square feet. These factors are common throughout the state as the equivalent impact fee unit for fee determination.
The use of these equivalency factors was based on existing rate form, discussions with the City,comparisons of fee
applicability provisions of neighboring jurisdictions,and promotion of administrative simplicity.
Impact Fee Comparisons
In order to provide the City additional information about the proposed impact fees, a comparison of the proposed
fees for the City and those charged by other neighboring jurisdictions was prepared. Both the graph below and
Table 4-6 at the end of this section summarizes the impact fees for police services charged by other communities with
the proposed rates of the City.
(Remainder of page intentionally left blank)
4-5
$1,200
$1,000
$800
$600 $526 $580
Surveyed Average: $428.00 M
$400
$200
$0
tope
°e
1 Q
pX� e � p
e a
p .�J° �� ��a p��.° �`c�`�\��e C?�a pc� p��Q \��°� p��a o��a \A° `�A°
C�` 6"a C.
6,A
(Remainder of page intentionally left blank)
4-6
Page 1 of 1
Section 4
City of Clermont
Police Services Impact Fee Analysis
List of Tables
Table Description
4-1 Summary of Existing Personnel
4-2 Summary of Existing Capital Equipment, Vehicles,and Facilities
4-3 Summary of Proposed Capital Equipment, Vehicles, and Facilities
4-4 Summary of Capital Costs to Provide Police Protection Services
4-5 Deisgn of Impact Fee
4-6 Police Services Impact Fee Comparison
Page I of 1
Table 4-1
City of Clermont
Police Services Impact Fee Analysis
Summary of Existine Personnel
Allocation to Future Officers
Line Current Allocation Achieved
No. Description Staff[1] Basis LOS
Personnel
1 Police Chief 1.0
2 Captain 3.0
3 Lieutenant 5.0
4 Sergeant 11.0
5 Officer 70.0
6 SRT K-9 2.0
7 Total Sworn Officers 92.0 Per 1,000 Population 1.97
8 Police Service Aide II(Quartermaster) 1.0
9 Crime Scene&Evidence Supervisor 1.0
10 Crime Intelligence Analyst 1.0
11 Evidence Custodian/CSI 1.0
12 Administrative Assisant 1.0
13 Police Service Aide 11(Quartermaster) 1.0
14 Records Supervisor 1.0
15 Staff Assistant 2.0
16 Total Personnel 101.0
Footnotes:
[1] As shown in the Fiscal Year 2022 Annual Budget.
Page 1 of 1
Table 4-2
City of Clermont
Police Services Impact Fee Analysis
Summary of Existine Capital Equipment,Vehicles and Facilities
Line Actual Allocation to Allocated
No. Description Costs[1] Existing Units Costs
Machinery&Equipment
1 General Equipment $1,499,904 0.0% $0
2 Major Vehicles&Vehicle Related Equipment 3,834,265 100.0% 3,834,265
Other Capital Equipment and Facilities
3 Land,Building and Other Major Capital Equipment 8,329,308 100.0% 8,329,308
4 Subtotal Other Capital Equipment and Facilities $13,663,478 $12,163,573
5 Grants Funded/Contributed Assets $0 100.00/0 $0
6 Total Adjusted Existing Capital Investment $13,663,478 89.00/0 $12,163,573
Footnotes:
[1] Amounts shown based on cost information provided by the City and detailed in Appendix 2.
P.g.let l
Table 43
C7dy.fCWeret
Polk-Snkr I.Peee Fr Aeattak
Issel.n.fPewerd CaNel Eaadorst.Vddde aad Fae00b
Li- FY 23-27 Adj tt d New,RRR
No. Dmmit4im FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 ToW Adjamrsmt. TOW ace UPgramle
1 Replwem m V-hick. 5232,0DO $520,000 $520,000 1520.000 5520,0D0 $520,000 52A32AM (S2,E32,000) SD R!R
2 7 Nw YAdad Police Vehicle Fw 7 New Petrol Off 232,DDO 45sim 455,OD0 450,0DD 450,000 450AD0 2,492.OW 0 2,492,000 New
3 Lap"To Equip 7 New Pour 011wws 4,400 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14.000 74AM (74.400) 0 Exhale
4 7 Tawas To Equip 7 Now Police Ofr a 4,400 121" 12,600 12,600 12,600 12.600 67,400 (67,400) 0 Ealode
5 Body C-mm-Syt.nn To Eqt p 7 New Police Off- 4,111DO 12AM 12.600 12,600 12AM 12,600 67.11100 (67.111M 0 Bxaltrd.
6 AED.To Equip 7 New Police V.htcle 5,600 I1N0 11,900 11.900 11,900 11,900 63,100 (65,100) 0 E-dude
7 Ballistic Sto"To Equip 7 New Police OCr 6,000 11900 11,900 11,900 11,900 ION 65,500 (65.500) 0 Exclude
1 Radice To Equip 7 New Police Off- 20,DDO 35,000 35,000 35,ODO 35,000 35,000 195,000 (195,0D0) 0 ®telud.
9 BEARCAT Arad Rcsouc Volmle 275AOD 0 0 0 0 0 275A00 0 275,000 New
10 Uta.c dA-1 Vehiok. 100,ODO 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 (IOOA00) 0 Excude
I I FARO Crime Sane MPP%Sollwere Program 75,ODo 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 (75,000) 0 Eahale
12 Mobile Co®od Vd le 0 0 450.000 0 0 0 450,000 0 150,000 Nw
13 Awcoerd I.-Plate Redo. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eahtde
14 Pebb.Skty T.W.S Facility Demuck 0 362-W 0 0 0 0 362900 0 362,500 New
15 Public Safety Trammg Facility Deep 0 0 100.000 0 0 0 IOOAW 0 100.000 New
16 Public Safety T.i i%Facility Construction 0 0 0 2AW,000 0 0 2.000.OW 0 2.000.000 New
17 Public Safety Tnimn Facility Equipmem 0 0 0 200.000 0 0 2(10,000 (M.ODO) 0 Bad.&
IS Police sub5tacm(Well.-Wry) 0 0 110,000 775,000 0 0 11595.OW 0 I,SSSADO W.
19 Tat.)P-poted Capu L"*.N1,V-lkka ad Falk. 3959,200 91,435,%0 $2.433,000 14,043,OW S1,068,000 $11.069.000 $11.006.700 ($3.742,200) $7.264,500
Foomotoe:
it] by W Cal.
Page 1 of 1
Table 4-4
City of Clermont
Police Services Impact Fee Analysis
Summary of Capital Costs to Provide Police Protection Services
Line Total Existing& Amount of Average Total Officer Total Projected
No. Description Planned Costs[1] Officers Served[2] Cost Per Officer Requirements[3] Investment
Recouoment Costs 141
1 Machinery&Equipment $0 106 $0 127 $0
2 Major Vehicles 3,834,265 106 36,172 127 4,593,884
3 Facilities&Other Capital Equipment[5] 8,329,308 155 53,737 127 6,824,659
4 Total Recoupment Costs S12,163,573 $89,910 S11,418,543
Proposed Capital Additions 161
5 Major Vehicles $3,217,000 127 S25,331 127 $3,217,000
6 Future Facilities 4,047,300 155 26,113 127 3,316,339
7 Total Proposed Costs $7,264,500 $51,444 $6,533,339
Additional Cost or Adjustments 171
8 Borrowing Costs SO 106 $0 127 So
9 Less Historical Capital Grants Received for Equipment 0 106 0 127 0
10 Less Proposed Future Capital Grants 0 106 0 127 0
11 Total Additional Costs or Adjustments $0 $0 $0
12 Total Allocated Costs $19,428,073 S141,353 $17,951,881
Footnotes:
[1] Amounts based on information provided on Table 4-2 and Table 4-3.
[2] Existing vehicles assumed to serve the current required number of officers of 106 as calculated below.Proposed vehicles
are assumed to serve the future required number of officers of 127 as calculated below.For the purposes of allocating facility
costs,both existing and futre facilities estimated to serve 155 officers.
[31 Future Patrol Officer Requirements based on level of Service Standards adopted by the City.
Future Patrol Officer needs are calculated as follows:
Projected Population at 2027 55,918
Targeted LOS per 1,000 population 2.27
Total Patrol Officers Required in 2027 127
Total Patrol Officers Required based on LDS 106
Total Additional Officers Requred to Serve Growth 21
[4] Amounts derived from Table 4-2-
[5] Amounts reflect existing and fume facilities estimated to serve 155 officers.
[6] Amounts derived from Table 4-3.
[7] Amounts reflect credit for historical grants received for equipment needs.No f pure grants currently anticipated by staff.
Page 1 of 2
Table 4.5
City of Cltrmont
Police Seryicn Impact Fee AmlyS6
Imoael Fee Allocation-Base Capacity/Variable
Proposed Ewring
I- Fttrtctiorial Petaptts pen Base Coat Base Coat Vanable Cost Impact Fee Impact Fee berets/
No. Lnd Use Unh of Measure Pop.Fxtor Unit Yet Peraoe I I I Per Unit Per Uai 121 (Rou dud) (Rotoded) (Uomm)
1 Rniden0al D-fitm Unit 0.628226 2.92 S211." $398.62 5191.20 $590.00 5526.00 554.00
Nwt-Residrn0a1
I IndtstrialNlwet mum 1,000 Sq R 0.087542 NIA 5211.89 $18.33 59.56 $28.00 SR5.00 (557.00)
3 Irwitutiorad 1,000 Sq Ft 0.200299 N/A HIM 42.44 21.36 64.00 N/A NIA
4 NoteVMdel Romm 3.207758 N/A 211.89 679.69 350.13 1,030.00 792.00 239.00
5 Office Bwldirtgs 1,000 sq FI 0.816132 NIA 21139 172.93 $9.08 I62.00 337,00 (75.00)
6 Re"a 1,000 Sq Ft 2.456451 NIA 211.89 520.50 269.12 789.00 1,085.00 (296.00)
7 Assisted living Facility(ALF) Bed 0.923750 NIA 211.89 174.54 $9.91 264.00 460 00 (196.00)
8 Sboold rtonc of the above Iard uses adeq.itly der a proposed non-residential deycI pmml as decent aW by the City Maragra,id the Mmasees ttl I ion the Mowing swage chart per
ra mr-idrnUal development u considered appropriate_
Non-residential
9 Total Coat Per Parton I Base I I II 5211.89
10 Percent Allocable to Resident 60.00%
11 Amount Al)-blc to the Resident 5127.13
12 Asev rot Albcablc to Noo-residential $94.76
13 Plus Cert per Person I Variable 1 121 109,15
14 Artsount Allocablc to Non-residentul S193.91
13 Square Fed of Non-residential Development per Pers- 250.00
16 Pe-per 1,000 Square Fed 4,00
17 A-ge Cost per 1 00U Sq-Feet of Non-,.idc.1.1 De,eloprr m 5715.64
Foots MY
(1) Brae Capacity estimted as follows'
Ewdn Poprlatino 46,655
Ewtmg LDS per 1,000 pnpulation 2,27
Total Patrol Officen Requved-LOS 106
Mir-Service I-el per 1,000 population 1,50
Total Mmhorrm Officers 70
Percent Base Capacity-I.Ds 66%
Page 2 of'-
Table 4-5
City of C3errrront
Police Services Impact Fee Analysis
Immct F2e Alloeaibn-Base CuMlit,1 Variable
Proposed Lusting
line Fu. 1—.1 Persons Per Base Coss Base Con Varmble Cosl Impact Fee Impact Fee In--I
No, I—d Use Unit of Measmc Pop.F.— Unit per Peracm 11) Pet Unit Per Uait[21 (R.-&d) (R000ded) (Uareasc)
Taal Basc capacity estimated as follows.
Taal Eminnated Capita Cons-Investment in Police Service. S17.951,881
P—I Bane Capacity 66%
Taal Eaunuted Base Capacity Costs S11,848.242
Taal in Populstia 2027 55,918
Total Cost per Person 5211.89
[21 Variable C-I per Unit estimated as follows.
ToW Funuzud CnpiW Costs-Investmeot m Pobw Services $17,951,981
Itss Armrru allocated to Base Capacm, 11,849.242
Total Variable Coat $6,103,639
Peroem R aidentiel(Huu—I Call i 601/6
Taal Reaidentul Coats S3,662,184
Told Non-recidcnial Coss S2.411,435
Residential Varuble Allocation Costs per Estimated Units Variable
Assrmed Calls Class 2027 Cat W U-
ResMentta 100.00% $3,662,184 19,153 S191.20
Nonraidemial Variable Allocaton
T.W Fsumeted C.piW Cats-Lrveattnent in Police Services $2.441,455
Tout Ftmcuond(Nom-swidemiaD Population 2027 22.367
Taw cat Per Pmaon 1.1 S109.15
[e1 Applied on■fonctional population basis
Page 1 of 1
Table 4-6
City of Clermont
Police Services Impact Fee Analysis
Police Services Impact Fee Comparison III
Line Single
No. Description Family
City of Clermont
I City of Clermont-Existing $526.00
2 City of Clermont-Proposed 580.00
Other Florida Government Agencies:
3 City of Apopka $747.00
4 City of Edgewater 711.56
5 City of Eustis 137.98
6 Toho Water Authority(Kissimmee System) N/A
7 City of Lakeland 580.00
8 City of Lake Mary 165.00
9 City of Lake Wales 592.55
10 City of Leesburg 186.00
11 City of Minneola 191.40
12 City of Mount Dora 289.89
13 City of Ocoee 501.04
14 City of St. Cloud 1,029.00
15 City of Tavares 215.37
16 City of Winter Garden 339.00
17 City of Winter Haven 300.97
18 Other Florida Governmental Agencies'Average $427.63
Footnotes:
[1] Unless otherwise noted, amounts shown reflect impact fees in effect March 2023. This comparison is
intended to show comparable charges for similar service for comparison purposes only and is not
intended to be a complete listing of all rates and charges offered by each listed municipality.
SECTION 5 - FIRE SERVICES IMPACT FEE
General
This section provides a discussion of the development and design of the impact fee for fire services. Included in this
section is a discussion of the level of service requirements and capital costs included as the basis for the determination
of the fee level and the design of the fee to be applied to new growth within the City.
Level of Service Requirements
There is currently no formally adopted level of service for the City's fire protection services;however, it is the City's
intent to maintain staffing levels that provide services to all developed areas in order to be able to respond to service
calls within a specified time period to maintain the City's Insurance Services Office("ISO")property insurance rating
of Class 1 in the community.ISO ratings are a measure a fire departments ability to provide service to the community
and are based on a survey across key areas including water supply,personnel, communication systems,etc.A score
of one (1)is the highest a department can achieve while 10 is the lowest. The City's rating of Class I means most
residences and businesses are within five (5) miles of a fire station and 1,000 feet of a hydrant in addition to other
service and facility related requirements. Regarding response times it is necessary to reach property and residents of
the City within a response time standard to maximize the effectiveness of fire suppression activities and/or
emergency medical care. The City currently has a target of approximately 900/6 of calls being responded to within
eight(8) minutes and 50 seconds or less. In discussions with City staff, it was determined that to continue to meet
these standards,the City would have to build two more fire stations by 2040.
Presently, the City has plans to increase staffing to 132 full-time primary personnel by 2040 with the addition of
Stations 5 and 6 as shown on Table 5-1 and below.
Summary of Existing and Planned Personnel
Current Station 5 Station 6 Total Planned
Primary Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel
Fire Chief 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
Assistant Chief 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0
Captain 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0
Inspector 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0
Administrative Assistant 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
Office Manager 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
Battalion Chief(Primary) 3.0 3.0 3.0 6.0
Lieutenant(Primary) 21.0 6.0 6.0 27.0
Firefighter(Primary) 39.0 9.0 9.0 48.0
Engineer(Primary) 21.0 6.0 6.0 27.0
Total Personnel 94.0 24.0 24.0 142.0
Based on the primary personnel listed above, the level of service in terms of the number of direct fire personnel per
1,000 residents is about 1.80 in 2040.
5-1
Existing Investment in Department
In the development of the fee,the original costs of the existing assets and any grant funding or contributions towards
those assets were considered. The City's existing assets are categorized by major type and are summarized below.
Since eligible impact fee costs under the Florida Impact Fee Act are limited to major capital items,certain costs are
excluded from the impact fee analysis including items such as uniforms,radios, and other equipment items that do
not have a minimum five-(5)year life.
Inventoryof City Fire Assets[1]
Allocation to
Description Estimated Costs_ Existing Units Allocated Costs
Machinery and Equipment $2,459,895 0.0% $0
Major Vehicles&Vehicle Related Equipment 5,307,237 100.0% 5,307,237
Other Capital Equipment and Facilities 6.338,386 100.0% 6,338,386
Sub Total $14,105,519 82.6% $11,645,623
Retirement Adjustments/Grants $0 100.0% $0
Net Future City Investments in Fire Assets $14,106,519 82.6% $11,646,623
[1] Amounts as provided by City staff and are shown on Appendix 3 and summarized on Table 5 2.
As shown above,of the$14.1 million in fire department assets, $11.6 of major assets are included in the calculation
of the impact fee. Additionally, based on information provided by the City, the department has received no grant
funding and capital contributions which could offset the capital costs included in the proposed impact fees.
Planned Future Investment in Department
In the development of the proposed fee, the following capital improvement requirements were provided by the City.
Along with the City's existing investment in fire rescue assets,these capital requirements are anticipated and designed
to maintain the department's ability to provide service to the City's existing and future population levels and fulfill
the identified level of service standards. The City's major capital requirements included in the impact fee calculation
are summarized below.
(Remainder of page intentionally left blank)
5-2
Projected Future City Investment in Fire Dep.
Total Capital
Description Improvements Adjustments Adjusted Total
Tablet,Wi-Fi Capable for Trench Rescue Efforts $3,000 ($3,000) $0
Confined Space Hydraulic Cutter for Trench Rescue Efforts 3,918 (3,918) 0
Replacement Hydraulic Ram-Heavy Rescue 1/Tower 103 for Trench 4,083 (4,083) 0
Rescue Efforts
Administration Copier/Printer/Scanner/Fax 5,583 (5,583) 0
Strut Driver Retrofit Kits for Heavy Rescue for Trench Rescue Efforts 6,600 (6,600) 0
Paratech Interstate Kit with Bipod for Trench Rescue Efforts 24,525 (24,525) 0
Trailer for Trench Rescue Efforts 30,000 (30,000) 0
Combustible Gas Leak Detector for Trench Rescue Efforts 2,200 (2,200) 0
3/4"-2"Gas Squeeze Off Tool for Trench Rescue Efforts 5,400 (5,400) 0
Hypoxia Hemoglobin Sensor for Trench Rescue Efforts 6,000 (6,000) 0
Replace Gas Air Monitors for Trench Rescue Efforts 6,000 (6,000) 0
2"-6"Gas Squeeze Off Tool for Trench Rescue Efforts 7,272 (7,272) 0
Zumro Shelter 860 Inflatable 65,000 (65,000) 0
Emergency Generator Fire Station 1/Admin 271,020 (271,020) 0
Bunker Gear(Includes 5%per Year Increase) 47,115 (47,115) 0
Bunker Gear(Includes 5%per Year Increase) 450,891 (450,891) 0
Replace Fire Inspector Vehicle 150,000 (150,000) 0
Replace Engine 101 629,954 (393,044) 236,910
Battalion 101 60,000 0 60,000
Ruggedized Laptop for the New Vehicle for Three Firefighter Floaters 6,000 (6,000) 0
Reclassed to Shift Captain
Replacement of One High Pressure Lift Bag Kit Heavy Rescue 22,315 (22,315) 0
25 Replacement Sets of Bunker Gear(50 Capital Items) 81,250 (81,250) 0
50 Balance Due for SCBA&Accessories Approved by City Council 121,781 (121,781) 0
3/9/2021
Air Fill Station 88,000 (88,000) 0
Engine 101 Equipment-New Program that Adds Capacity During 65,000 (65,000) 0
Emergencies
Replace Ladder 102 1,300,000 (466,023) 833,977
Demolish and Construction of Station 102 11,300,000 (1,017,436) 10,282,564
Diesel Filters(9) 84,550 (84,550) 0
Demolish and Construction of Old Fleet Facility 875,000 (875,000) 0
De-Muck 12th Street Training Site 725,000 0 725,000
Public Safety Training Facility Design 350,000 0 350,000
Public Safety Fire Training Facility(Tower, Bum Building etc.) 1,500,000 0 1,500,000
Construction
Public Safety Training Facility Equipment 125,000 (125,000) 0
Table continued on following page.
5-3
Projected -•.
Total Capital
Description Improvements Adjustments Adjusted Total
Fire Station 105 Design 450,000 0 450,000
Fire Station 105 Construction 15,000,000 0 15,000,000
Fire Engine 105 Equipment 250,000 (250,000) 0
Fire Engine 105 750,000 0 750,000
Replacement Engine 103 800,000 (262,450) 537,550
Replacement Vehicle for Existing Fire Inspector Position 105,000 (105,000) 0
Fire Station 6 Land 1,000,000 0 1,000,000
Reserve Ladder 102 Equipment—New Program that Adds Capacity 50,000 (50,000) 0
During Emergencies
SCBAs for Reserve Engine 101 and Reserve Ladder 102—New 101,250 (101,250) 0
Program
Renovations for Fire Stations 1, 3, and 4 1,000,000 (1,000,000) 0
Vehicles for Administrative Captains 130,000 0 130,000
Fire Station 105 Medcart 80,000 (80,000) 0
Fire Station 105 Medcart Equipment 75,000 (75,000) 0
Extrication Equipment for Engine 103—Has Never Had This 771,200 (771,200) 0
Equipment
Fire Engine 105 Medical Equipment 60,000 (60,000) 0
Video Laryngoscopes(6) 17,250 (17,250) 0
Toughbooks for Dispatching Information 32,750 (32,750) 0
Emergency Generator Fire Station 3 110,250 (110,250) 0
Advanced Life Support Monitors/Defibrillators 326,950 (326,950) 0
Fire Station 106 Design 450,000 0 450,000
Fire Station 106 Construction 15,000,000 0 15,000,000
Fire Engine 106 Equipment 250,000 0 250,000
Fire Engine 106 750,000 0 750,000
Net Future City Investments in Police Assets $65,982,107 ($7,676,107) $48,306,000
(1] Amounts as provided by City staff and are shown on Table 5-3.
As can be seen above, the City anticipates spending$48.3 million in impact fee eligible projects in order to further
develop the fire rescue facilities to provide the desired level of service to the City as it grows through 2040.
Design of Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee
The method used to determine the fire rescue services impact fee is a combination of the improvements-driven
method and buy-in method as the recoupment of a portion of existing investments available to serve new growth and
the costs associated with adding additional capacity to service the City's future needs are recognized. This method
was based upon a three-(3)step process. Table 5-5 helps to illustrate the results of the approach. The following is a
brief description of the method used in this study.
5-4
• Development of Total Capital Need—Based on discussions with the City and the Fire Department and the
level of service requirements related to the maintenance of first response time,the incremental facilities,and
related costs to serve the population through the forecast period reflected in the analysis was developed.
• Allocation of Base Capital Costs to Customer Classes—This step allocates the base capital costs,the reserved
service capacity allocable to all customer classes irrespective of call demand. The base costs are calculated
on a per person basis and then allocated between residential and non-residential land-uses based on
"functional population" estimates.
• Allocation of Variable Costs to Customer Classes—This step allocates the remaining capital costs to provide
fire/ EMS services between the residential and non-residential land-uses based upon call demand.
Therefore, some classes of land-use, which may incur few or no service calls, will carry a lower cost than
other high-demand sectors such as retail.
• Calculation of Cost per Equivalent Impact Fee Unit— Once the allocated base and variable costs are
identified per land-use,they are summarized and presented as a unit of measure basis;per dwelling unit,per
1,000 square feet,per bed,or per room.Table 5-5 provides a detailed listing of the proposed impact fees and
their appropriate land-use and measures.
FIRE RESCUE SERVICES IMPACT FEE ASSUMPTIONS
The development of the fire services impact fees required several assumptions. The major assumptions used in the
development of the proposed impact fees are as follows:
In the development of the capital costs to serve growth, the total existing and projected capital costs of
providing fire services were developed as described previously based on existing asset records and proposed
capital expenditures through 2040.The total existing and projected investment of$60.0 million was the cost
basis used in the development of the fees.
The estimated capital base costs or reserved service capacity,allocable to all customer classes were allocated
between the residential and non-residential customer classes based on "functional population" estimates.
The concept of functional population is incorporated in order to spread capital costs more equitably between
residential and non-residential land-uses. Businesses place demands on fie / rescue services in the same
manner as residents do, and it is equitable to spread these costs based on the average number of people
expected to be present.For the residential uses, the allocation is calculated per resident based on the average
amount of time spent at the residence. The resident's remaining time is then allocated as either an employee
and/or visitor to the remaining non-residential classes is determined using traffic generations, estimated
employment data, and operational details. The net result is the total number of person hours per location as
derived from Table 2-3 in Section 2. The base costs are calculated on a per person basis and then applied to
the residential and non-residential land-uses based upon the respective functional population coefficient.
The estimated variable cost of providing fire rescue services was allocated between the residential and non-
residential customer classifications based on the estimated number of service calls made by the Fire
Department per land-use for 2020 and 2021.
5-5
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Based on the above-referenced assumptions,the allocated capital facilities considered necessary to maintain the level
of service requirements,and the residential units and land use projections of the City,the fire services impact fees for
the residential and non-residential customer classifications were estimated. As shown in Table 5-5 at the end of this
section,the cost per equivalent impact fee unit by customer classification was calculated.The following summarizes
the proposed fire impact fees:
ProposedExisting and ..
Description Unit of Measure Existing Proposed
Residential Dwelling Unit $637.00 $1,370.00
Non-Residential:
IndustriaINVarehousing 1,000 Sq.Ft. $131.00 $82.00
Institutional 1,000 Sq.Ft. WA 187.00
Hotel/Motel Rooms 1,197.00 3,000.00
Office Buildings 1,000 Sq.Ft. 509.00 763.00
Retail 1,000 Sq.Ft. 1,640.00 2,298.00
Assisted Living Facility('ALF°) Bed 694.00 771.00
Taking into account the methodology used for the determination of the fee and the estimates associated with
determining the fire rescue capital needs of the City,it is concluded that the proposed impact fee utilizing the City's
LOS standard are reasonable. It should be noted that in the development of the fee per equivalent impact fee unit,
that no credits associated with developer land dedication or other similar activities have been recognized. Also, it
should be noted that the proposed incremental capital improvements are stated in Fiscal Year 2022 dollars and do
not include any inflationary allowances.
To meet the City's needs in terms of providing the necessary fire related capital improvements required by growth,
the City should increase the fees to the calculated amount as demonstrated on the tables above. As discussed in the
Executive Summary, there are several factors causing an extraordinary circumstance for the City including recent
significant capital cost increases associated with inflation in addition to the need for capital improvements based on
the significant increase in population growth experienced by the City historically and projected going forward.
In the development of the cost per equivalent impact fee unit,it was determined that the rate should be applied on a
"per dwelling unit"basis for the residential class and primarily on a"per square footage"of commercial development
for the non-residential class.As shown in Table 5-5,some non-residential land-uses are measured by units other than
square feet. These factors are common throughout the state as the equivalent impact fee unit for fee determination.
The use of these equivalency factors was based on discussions with the City, comparisons of fee applicability
provisions of neighboring jurisdictions, and promotion of administrative simplicity.
Impact Fee Comparisons
In order to provide the City additional information about the proposed impact fees, a comparison of the proposed
fees for the City and those charged by other neighboring jurisdictions was prepared. Both the graph below and
Table 5-6 at the end of this section summarizes the impact fees for fire services charged by other communities with
the proposed rates of the City.
5-6
$1,600
$
$1,400 1,370
$1,200
$1,000
$800 $637
$600 Surveyed Average: $465.00
$400
$0
e� \z ova ¢e \�� �a Ja ea
Jy �a ,pJ era Jac O° a a� ca a z L° \yam oQ �\o Cy
° ��a o� of �,aQO �e � �a� �� °
J
Liao �\��o ���� °��` ��°� ��` �jS °� ��o L�� `�o� �J �,�a° °�.�
CIA ��� �"A L o�C, �(\e
�-Ao
V`
(Remainder of page intentionally left blank)
5-7
Page 1 of 1
Section 5
City of Clermont
Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee Analysis
List of Tables
Table Description
5-1 Summary of Existing Personnel
5-2 Summary of Existing Capital Equipment, Vehicles, and Facil
5-3 Summary of Proposed Capital Equipment, Vehicles, and Faci
5-4 Summary of Capital Costs to Provide Fire Rescue Services
5-5 Design of Fire Impact Fee
5-6 Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee Comparison
Page 1 of 1
Table 5-1
City of Clermont
Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee Analysis
Summary of Existine Personnel
Line Existing Current Staffing Staffing Total
No. Personnel[1] Needs[2] Station 5 [3] Station 6[4] Staffing
Personnel
1 Fire Chief 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
2 Assistant Chief 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0
3 Captain 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0
4 Inspector 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0
5 Administrative Assistant 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
6 Office Manager 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
7 Battalion Chief 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 9.0
8 Lieutenant 21.0 0.0 6.0 6.0 33.0
9 Firefighter 30.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 57.0
10 Engineer 21.0 0.0 6.0 6.0 33.0
11 Total Personnel 85.0 9.0 24.0 24.0 142.0
Support
12 Fire Marshal 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
13 Fire Plans Reviewer 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
14 Fire&Life Safety Educator 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
15 Logistics/Professional Standards Officer 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
16 Department Chaplain-Volunteer 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
17 Total Support 5.0 - - - 5.0
18 Total Personnel&Support 90.0 9.0 24.0 24.0 147.0
Level of Service
19 Firefighter/Rescue Division 75.0 9.0 24.0 24.0 132.0
Footnotes:
[11 As shown in the Fiscal Year 2022 Annual Budget.
[2] In addition to existing personnel,the City has applied for a FEMA SAFER Grant to bring on an additional nine(9)
firefighters to increase apparatus staffing levels up to four firefighters per apparatus.
[3] Twenty four(24)Firefighters required for Station 5 as provided by the City.
[4) Twenty four(24)Firefighters required for Station 6 as provided by the City.
Table 5-2
City of Clermont
Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee Analysis
Summary of Existing Capital Equipment.Vehicles,and Facilities
Line Estimated Allocation to Allocated
Description Costs[1] Existing Units Costs
Machinery& Equipment
1 General Equipment $2,459,895 0.0% $0
2 Major Vehicles&Vehicle Related Equipment 5,307,237 100.0% 5,307,237
Other Capital Equipment and Facilities
3 Land,Building and Other Major Capital Equipment 6,338,386 100.0% 6,338,386
4 Subtotal Other Capital Equipment and Facilities $14,105,519 82.6% $11,645,623
5 Grants Funded/Contributed Assets $0 100.0% $0
6 Total Adjusted Existing Capital Investment $14,105,519 82.6% $11,645,623
Footnotes:
[11 Amounts shown based on cost information provided by the City and detailed in Appendix 3.
[2] Based on existing number of firefighters as shown on Table 5-1.
hp 1 d2
T.bb SJ Cjly.fcb-1
F7rs Re.ore{colas Rmpect Fee Ale y b
lirr FY 22.27 A4eeted New,BAR,
100. D-j i.. FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 202e FY 202S FY 2026 FY2027 Total Adjerrl d Ta.1 ergnde
I T.61d,Wfi C.pble F.T-h Rmuc MO. 53AW 50 SO 50 m 50 53J)DD ({3,000) m Eegdd
2 Cod od Sp-Hydau{e Cema Per,Trench Revert Effene 3.913 0 0 0 0 0 3,915 (3918) 0 Excluded
3 R.plremea Hyda.Ik R--Heevy R-.IfT-103 Fa Trmck Revue Effora 4A53 0 0 0 0 0 4,013 (4,093) 0 E.Ndd
d Aelmmfrrio.CopedPiadge.nnn/F. 5,513 0 D 0 0 0 5,593 (5� 0 Eoeldad
5 Strut Driver Remelt I.Fa Hrvy R-For Trench Reee.E&M 6600 0 0 0 0 0 61600 (61600) 0 Eshgd
6 P--h Warne Kit With Biped F.Torch R-Eff.m 24,515 0 0 0 0 0 24,525 (2025) 0 Fclduded
7 Trd.r For Trreeh R-Efforte 30,OW 0 0 0 0 0 30.000 (30,DW) 0 E-hwd
Combustible I.a O.e k Doeclm Fm Trench Resew E?onr 2,2W 0 D 0 0 0 2.2W (2,2W) 0 E a dd
9 3W-2'Or Sgavra Off Tod For Torch R-Effort. S,dW 0 0 0 0 0 5,400 Mew) 0 Eeeleded
10 Hm ie Heerlbbi.Serror Fm T.,.h Rees Effort. 6,ODD 0 D 0 0 0 6,000 (6A00) 0 EBWdsd
11 Replace Or Air Mealon For Trench Rees Mr. 61000 0 0 0 0 0 6.000 (6A00) 0 Esl.ded
12 2'-6'Or Sgeeeee Off Tool For Trawh Reece.Ellen. 7.272 0 0 0 0 0 7.M (7,Z72) 0 hlrehe/d
13 Zesmo Shelter 960 hdmbk 0 0 65AW 0 0 0 63,000 (65.000) 0 E.Ardd
14 Emapmy Oer r Fie Station VAdin 0 771.020 0 0 0 0 271 A20 MUM 0 Emaudd
15 Beta Om(Islda 5%Pa Yeer lnaesee) 0 0 0 47.115 0 0 47,115 (47,115) 0 E.rlded
16 vulva Over odd.5%Pa Yer lna.eac) 0 SIAW &5,650 19,%4 94,462 99,185 e50,991 (450,891) 0 Excluded
17 Replace Fie lspsta VeNck 0 35,000 35,OOD 0 40.000 e11AW I50,00o 050AW) 0 RAR
IB Beebe F*.101 0 62995d 0 0 0 0 629,95e (393,O44) 236,910 R&R
19 eemalb.lot 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 WOW 0 60AW New
20 Ru{pdixeel L.pop Fa Th:New Vehik F.,3 Frrehyae,Fbatae Relar.d To SbiS Cep in 0 0 6.Ooo 0 0 0 6,OW (6,DW) 0 h1khwed
21 RWWo Of(I)H Sh Preroa Lift Be#Kd Heevy Roes 22J 15 0 0 0 0 0 ZZ315 (22,315) 0 RAR
12 121)Repl.-m$a.Or B,dwr 0ar(50 C*w I-) 11.250 0 0 0 0 0 81350 MIZO) 0 RAR
23 (SO)Bderce the For SCBA A Aewrrfa Approved By City C;-ed 19121 121,73) 0 0 0 0 0 121,781 (121,781) 0 RAR
24 Air Rl SWbm 81,000 O 0 0 0 0 PAW MOM 0 Wudod
25 Eegirc 101 Eq.*--Nrw program thm dd.up..rty Brie,eerc.8arei. 0 65,DD0 0 0 0 0 63,OD0 (651000) 0 Esbdd
26 Replace LMder 102 0 0 130.M 0 0 0 1,30 ODO (466,023) 133,977 RAR
27 D-Wh AM Crrermtction O(Slseio.102 0 11)OQ000 0 0 0 0 II,3m.ow (1,017.436) 1O.M.61 Up{rd.
11 Diemel Fihm(9) 0 84-550 0 0 0 0 $4,550 (84,550) 0 rsA,-
29 Dnmlieb Ad Carr.dioo Of Old Fk F.mhty 0 0 0 975.000 0 0 975,000 (F75,000) 0 Exhdd
30 De-Muck 12Th Skeet Tawn{See 0 0 725Am 0 0 0 725,W0 0 725,W0 New
71 Pabke Sahly Tnvr F.dq D.i{. 0 0 0 350,Om 0 0 350,m0 0 750,Om New
32 P.616S.fmy Face Truiq Fecikty(T-1 Bwn Buddiie wu Eb.)Coeliae 0 0 D D 750,W0 750,OW I,SKOW 0 1,500.000 New
33 Pic Saf ublely TNdq F-ddy E"*i 0 0 0 0 125AD0 0 125,000 (125,OD0) 0 Pld ded
31 Foe Slmion 10S Deign 0 U .50A00 0 0 0 e50,om O .50.000 New
35 Foe SWb.105 Cemduction 0 0 0 IS,000,OW 0 0 1,.000,OD0 0 IS,OWAW New
36 Fie Fos]05 Fqt P-el 0 0 0 250.000 0 0 250,000 (250AOD) 0 Now
37 Fke Fror106 0 O 0 750,OW 0 0 750,OD0 0 750,OW New
38 Repl.ceaed Erode 103 0 0 0 0 1W,OW 0 m000 p62,450) 537,550 RAR
39 Raplaavnea Veliek For Fmotiq Fire heyeeeer n,dbn 0 35AW 0 70,W0 0 0 Io5,OD0 (105,0D0) 0 RAR
40 Fee Station 6 lxd 0 0 0 0 0 I,mO,OW I,000,OOD 0 LOWAW New
/1 Reserve L.ddr IME"ipmerd-NcwptoV mlbmdbmpeeiryduripeeeryereie. 0 50.000 0 0 0 0 50.00D (50AW) 0 E-kdd
12 SCBA.Rn Reserve Bqn 101 ed Rmm Ldda 102-Nm Pres,- 0 101,250 0 0 0 0 101,250 (101,2H0 0 Excluded
43 Rmonti ere fm Fue Sutior 1,3,wel e 0 1 AW.D 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 (1,000,000) 0 RAR
M VelieW 6r Adrei-r.11r C.pW. 0 0 130,000 0 0 0 130,OW 0 130AW New
d5 Fe.St.ion 105 Medan 0 0 0 9O,m0 0 0 SOOM (80,000) 0 Eshdd
46 Foe Union 105)Adam Egtipmea O 0 0 75,W0 0 0 75,000 (75,WO) 0 Fxehded
41 Eorieetion•9or"•••brE�.w IW-Hm.-Id fleeequfpr 0 31jm 0 75S ODD 0 0 771,1W col,2W) 0 EkAded
4
8 Fire E.&.105 Mdiat pgdpoeml 0 0 0 60,OW 0 0 60,000 (611,000) 0 Felled
49 Vide lsygoropee(6) 0 17,250 0 0 0 0 17,25D (17,250) 0 Eekdd
50 Teglrbooka 1.Dip.xhig Irdomsion 0 32,750 0 0 0 0 32,750 (32.750) 0 Fxcledd
51 Fra{vsy Omerab.Fire Ststion3 0 110,25D 0 0 0 0 110,250 (110.250) 0 Erhdd
32 Ad-need Life SWpon 56oeit-DAMI..re 0 75,850 79,650 33,650 17,100 0 326,950 (326,"0) 0 E cheded
53 F..Sbtien 106 Deep 0 0 450,00D 0 0 0 450,OW 0 450AW Nave
P*2d7
Tsbb 5-3
city o1ck—I
M R..-&visa Impse Fss A dy b
—n�f hreW CeL-L-�.ea.V ALk��d hcLM4.111
54 Fis Sbliom)06Ca kmlioa 0 0 0 15,000,000 0 0 15,ODO,OW 0 IS,OW,000 N-
55 Fie Eepe 106 B"P—f D 0 0 250,000 0 0 250AM 0 250.000 N-
56 Fir,Eyie 106 0 0 0 750,000 0 0 750,OW 0 750,OW N—
57 TNd Co911db>1Pwwlwb $477.927 513,910,67� f33263?0 S31AS0.729 f1,t97 2 fl lci f53,962,107 (t7yT6,107) isf.3 6,0W
Foobola:
(11 Y'brM
Page 1 of 1
Table 5-4
City of Clermont
Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee Analysis
Summary of Capital Costs to Provide Fire Rescue Services
Line Total Existing& Total Personnel Average Cost
No. Description Planned Costs[1] Requirements[2] Per Personnel
Recoupment Costs[31
1 Machinery&Equipment $0 132 $0
2 Major Vehicles&Fire Fighting Equipment 5,307,237 132 40,206
3 Other Capital Equipment&Facilities 6,338,386 132 48,018
4 Total Recoupment Costs $11,645,623 $88,224
Proposed Capital Additions [41
5 Major Vehicles $18,248,437 132 $138,246
6 Future Facilities 12,607,564 132 95,512
7 Station 6 Facility and Engine 17,450,000 132 132,197
8 Total Proposed Costs $48,306,000 $365,955
Additional Cost or Adjustments
9 Less Historical Capital Grants Received $0 132 $0
10 Less Proposed Future Capital Grants 0 132 0
11 Total Additional Costs or Adjustments $0 $0
12 Total Capital Costs $59,951,624 $454,179
Footnotes:
[1] Total estimated capital costs in Table 5-2 and Table 5-3.
[21 Future Requirements based on Level of Service Standards adopted by the City.
Future needs are calculated as follows:
Total LOS Personnel Required in 2027 108
Additional LOS Personnel Associated with Station 6['] 24
Total Rescue Personnel by 2040 132
Projected Population at 2040 73,363
Planned 2040 LOS per 1,000 population 1.80
[*]Station 6 is assumed to require an additional staffing of 24 personnel based on the needs for Station 5.
[31 Amounts derived from Table 5-2.
141 Amounts derived from Table 5-3.
Page 1 of 2
Table S•5
City of Clermont
Flee Rescue Servka Impact Fee Amlysis
Dedoe of Fire Imoad Fec
Propmed Eaiatng
Li. F=Moml Perms par Ban Cast Bane Cost Variable Cost Impact Fm Impart Fee LDUU e I
No. Isad Use Unit of Measure Pop.Factor Unit per Person f 11 P.Unit Per Unit (Romded) (Rotmdcdl (Dectesae)
1 Aaldemlal Dwelling Unit 0.629226 2,92 5OSO S749A0 $621.09 $070.00 $631.00 5733.00
Noo-RnldeaWl
2 InditionA Wamboututg 1,000 Sq Ft 0.097542 N/A 5408.60 $35.77 546.12 $82.00 $131.00 (549.00)
3 Inuitutaad 1,000 S4 Ft 0200299 N/A 408.60 91.94 105.31 107.00 NIA NIA
4 Roleym ml Rooms 3.207759 N/A 409.60 010.69 1.689.79 3,000.00 1,197.00 1,803.00
5 Office Buildings 1,000 Sq Ft 0.916132 N/A 408.60 333.47 429.92 763.00 509.00 234.00
6 Retail 1,000 Sq Ft 2.456451 N/A 408.60 1.003.71 1,294.01 2,299.00 1,640.00 659.00
7 Assisted I-S Facibty(AL.F) Bed 0.923750 N/A 408,60 336.58 433.94 771.00 694.00 77.00
8 Shoald ante of the above land uses adequately defame a proposed mnaesidaviel developoent as detc mo W by dte City Meager,at the Mampr's discretion the fogowing amp charge pa
urn-residm al devebpneot is crosidacd appmpriste:
Nm-retidential
9 Total Cost pa Perm I Bate I(I I $408.60
10 Percent Alloabk to Residers 62.82%
11 Amomt ABocAic w the Resident 5256.68
12 Assomt Allacable m N-sukatist $151.92
0 Phu Cost per Paso I Variable 1(2) 526.78
14 Amotan Allocable to Non-resideatid 5678.70
15 Sgtnrc Fmt of No csideotW Dewlapmat per Peron 250.00
16 Perms per 1,000 Sq-Rio 4.00
17 Avenge Cost per L,000 Sgttare Feet ofNoo-scudentid Development $2,714.80
Footnota
[1) Total Ban Capacity estimated as follows:
Total Fstimied Capita Casa-Invesmnnt in Fh Swvieas $59931,624
Pen,em Rase Capacity for Medhua,%gh Hazard Occupancws 5D%
Total Estimated Ban Capacity Costs 2�9.9
Total Papdabon 2040 73,363
Total Cost per Person $408.60
Page 2.12
Table 5-5
City of Cl,—m
Fire Rescue Servkes Impact Fn Aruiysis
ptg n of Firc iMoacl Ftt
Prop—d Eststmg
I'm Fuoctkrnal Persons per Base Cost Base Cost Vanabk Con 1.4—t Fcc lrttpact He Increase
No. Land Use --Unit of Measure _P1•.Facua Unit per Person[1) per Unit Per Unit (Rounded) (Rounded) (De—)
121 Varable Cm per Unn estimated m follows
ToW Estmated Capita Cm[-lnv smnem in Foe Scnicea S59.951,624
Less Amount aIMuud in Base Capacity 29.975,812
Tout V.n bk Cost $29,975,812
Pem,m Rcsid=tW(Historical) 52.07%
Total Residential Costs $15,607,400
ToW Noo-residcmial Cosa 4 ,412
Resdenlial Variabk AD—tion
ToW Reaidcntiai Cosa S15,607,400
2040 Fatmmed Unns 25 129
Variable Cost per Unit I.09
Non-rsdential Variebk All—wit
Total Estimated CapiW Cosa-imesmxnt in Fire Rescue Se O $14.369,412
Total Functional(Non—denial)Population 2040 27,276
Total Cost per Pawn[•1 $526.78
1.1 Applied on a fimctional population base.
Page 1 of 1
Table 5-6
City of Clermont
Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee Analysis
Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee Comparison Ill
Line Single
No. Description Family
City of Clermont
I City of Clermont-Existing $637.00
2 City of Clermont-Proposed 1,370.00
Other Florida Government Agencies:
3 City of Apopka $708.00
4 City of Edgewater 469.56
5 City of Eustis 146.72
6 Toho Water Authority(Kissimmee System) N/A
7 City of Lakeland 398.00
8 City of Lake Mary 175.00
9 City of Lake Wales 512.71
10 City of Leesburg 207.00
11 City of Minneola 539.30
12 City of Mount Dora 443.81
13 City of Ocoee 636.00
14 City of St. Cloud 902.00
15 City of Tavares 402.78
16 City of Winter Garden 491.00
17 City of Winter Haven 483.90
18 Other Florida Governmental Agencies'Average $465.41
Footnotes:
[1] Unless otherwise noted,amounts shown reflect impact fees in effect March 2023. This comparison is
intended to show comparable charges for similar service for comparison purposes only and is not
intended to be a complete listing of all rates and charges offered by each listed municipality.
SECTION 6 — PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICE
IMPACT FEE
General
This section provides a discussion of the development and design of the proposed impact fee for parks and recreation
services. Included in this section is a discussion of the City's facility requirements and related capital costs included
as the basis for the fee determination, and the design of the fee to be applied to new growth within the City.
Existing Recreational Assets
In the determination of the fee, the original costs of the existing assets and any grant funding for those assets was
considered.The City's existing assets are categorized by type and are summarized below.
Inventory of City Parks and Recreation Assets [1]
Description Estimated Costs Adjustments Includable Costs
Machinery and Equipment $877,337 0.0% $0
Major Vehicles&Vehicle Related Equipment 210,634 0.0% 0
Other Capital Equipment and Facilities 53,217,715 100.0% 53,217,715
Subtotal $54,305,685 98.0% $53,217,715
Retirement Adjustments/Grants $0 100.0% _ $0
Net Future City Investments in Park Assets $64,306,685 98.0% $63,217,715
111 Amounts as provided by City staff and are shown on Appendix 4 and summarized on Table 6-2.
As shown above,of the$54.3 million in recreational assets,$53.2 million is included in the calculation of the impact
fee.
Capital Improvement Plan
In the determination of the fee, the following five-(5)year capital improvement plan was provided by the City for
this project. The City's major capital requirements included in the impact fee calculation are summarized below.
(Remainder of page intentionally left blank)
6-1
Projected Future City Investment in Parks and Recreation (Capital Plan)[1]
Total Capital
Description Improvements Adjustments Adjusted Total
Hancock Park Multipurpose Field 1 Remove Grass $147,015 ($147,015) $0
Fitness Court at Victory Pointe 160,000 0 160,000
Fiber Optics at Palatlakaha Paris 3,600 0 3,600
Design& Plan Future Dog Park 10,000 0 10,000
Copier/Scanner/Fax/Pnnter for Clermont City Center 5,583 (5,583) 0
Design& Engineer Carousel/Concession Stand at 12,500 0 12,500
Waterfront Park
Arts& Rec Center Lightening Protection System 23,771 0 23,771
Replace Commercial Gas Grill at Arts& Rec Center 1,900 (1,900) 0
Used Forklift at the Arts& Rec Center 7,200 (7,200) 0
Restroom Expansion at Performing Arts Center 50,000 0 50,000
Wireless Communication System at the Black Box Theater 10,000 (10,000) 0
Short Throw Projector and Lens for the Mainstage Theater 17,000 (17,000) 0
Engineering and Architectural Services for Restroom 6,000 0 6,000
Expansion at Performing Arts Center
Resod Athletic Fields 850,000 (850,000) 0
Vehicles 367,000 (367,000) 0
McKinney Basketball Court Resurface 60,000 (60,000) 0
Pal Baseball Gate Closures 8,000 (8,000) 0
Tennis Windscreens 28,000 (28,000) 0
Short Throw Projector CPAC 25,000 (25,000) 0
Pickleball/Tennis Net Systems 3,000 0 3,000
ARC Digital Sign 50,000 (50,000) 0
Sand Volleyball Courts 20,000 0 20,000
Black Box Projector 3,000 (3,000) 0
CPAC Wireless in-Ears System 10,000 (10,000) 0
ARC Entrance Lighting 25,000 (12,500) 12,500
Parks Playgrounds 120,000 (60,000) 60,000
Splash Pad Resurface 50,000 (50,000) 0
Hancock Scorer's Box 5,000 0 5,000
Field Light LED Conversion 1,200,000 (600,000) 600,000
Hiawatha Outdoor Classroom 10,000 0 10,000
Park Pavilions 160,000 0 160,000
ARC/CPAC Stadium Seating 1,100,000 0 1,100,000
Kehlor Pickleball Court 80,000 0 80,000
ARC Pickleball Courts +Parking 450,000 0 450,000
ARC Field Area Restroom 250,000 0 250,000
Table continued on following page.
6-2
Projected Future City Investment in Parks and Recreation(Capital Plan)[1](cont'd.)
Total Capital
Description Improvements Adjustments Adjusted Total
Waterfront Park Field Lights 140,000 0 140,000
ARC Multi-Purpose Field 300,000 0 300,000
8th St Marina 1,200,000 0 1,200,000
Property Acquisition+Development 4,000,000 0 4,000,000
Aquatics Facility 4,200,000 0 4,200,000
8th Street Paris 15,000,000 (5,000,000) 10,000,000
Net Future City Investments In Park Assets $30,168,569 ($7,312,198) $22,866,37
[1] Amounts as provided by City staff and are shown on Table 6-3.
As can be seen above, the City anticipates spending$22.9 million in impact fee eligible projects in order to further
develop the parks and recreation facilities as the City grows through 2027.
Design of Recreational Facility Impact Fee
The method used to determine the impact fee is a combination of the improvements-driven method and buy-in
method as the recoupment of a portion of existing investments available to serve new growth and the costs associated
with adding additional capacity to serve the City's future recreation needs are recognized.Table 6-5 at the end of this
report summarizes the results of the impact fee calculation. The following is a brief description of the method used
in this study:
• Development of Recoverable Assets— Based on the City's existing investment in recreation and park
facilities, and the dwelling unit projections by 2030, the total estimated cost of existing assets to serve
residents is identified.
• Development of Total Capital Need—Based on the City's estimated capital costs of developing future park
facilities, and the dwelling unit projections, the total estimated cost to serve total future residents is
developed.
• Development of Eouivalent Impact Fee Units— This step develops the estimated number of equivalent
impact fee units, which the fee is to be calculated such that a specific rate can be developed.This municipal
service is applicable only to the residential class and the equivalent unit is considered to be one(1)resident
(per resident application).
• Calculation of Cost per Dwelling Unit— Once the total capital costs allocable to each future resident are
determined,the cost per development unit was calculated,or the impact fee unit per dwelling(residence).
(Remainder of page intentionally left blank)
6-3
RECREATIONAL FACILITY IMPACT FEE ASSUMPTIONS
In the development of the recreation impact fees, several assumptions were required. The major assumptions used
in the development of the impact fees are as follows:
The development of the cost for the parks and recreation impact fees was based on the City's current
investment into park and recreation facilities and the City's estimated capital costs to develop future facilities
and activities.
_ As indicated in Table 6-4,the City has identified existing investment and future needs totaling$63.8 million,
which includes a credit for grants and other sources of cost-free capital,which reduced the burden by$12.3
million. The total needs were based primarily on actual investments made by the City, which should be
recouped from future residential growth.
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Based on the above-referenced assumptions, the recreation impact fee as set forth in detail on Table 6-4 was
determined as follows:
Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Calculation
Description Amounts
Existing Investment in Parks and Recreation $53,217,715
Future Investment in Parks and Recreation 22,856,371
Previously Grant Funded/Donated Assets (12,284,805)
Total Costs of Investments in Recreational Facilities,Activities and Parklands $63,789,281
Total Costs of Investments in Recreational Facilities,Activities and Parklands $63,789,281
Total City Population in 2030 61,133
Total Costs to be Recovered per Person $1,043.45
Proposed ..
Persons Proposed
Housing Type _ per Dwelling Impact Fee
0-1 Bedroom 1.43 $1,492.00
2 Bedrooms 2.15 2,243.00
3 Bedrooms 2.86 2,984.00
4 Bedrooms 3.58 3,736.00
5+Bedrooms 4.30 4,487.00
The proposed rate per person is applied to the residential classes (single-family, multi-family, and mobile homes)
based on the number of residents per dwelling unit as shown in Table 6-5.
(Remainder of page intentionally left blank)
6-4
As discussed in the Executive Summary,there are restrictions put in place for all impact fee increases.The proposed
fees are required to be phased-in over a two-(2)year period.The table below shows the phase in schedule:
impactPhase-in of Parks
_ Housing Type Existing Fee FY 2023 FY 2024
0-1 Bedroom $1,371.00 $1,431.50 $1,492.00
2 Bedrooms 2,048.00 2,145.50 2,243.00
3 Bedrooms 2,739.00 2,861.50 2,984.00
4 Bedrooms 3,419.00 3,577.50 3,736.00
5+Bedrooms 4,098.00 4,292.50 4,487.00
Impact Fee Comparisons
In order to provide the City additional information about the proposed impact fees, a comparison of the proposed
fees for the City and those charged by other jurisdictions was prepared. Both the graph below and Table 6-8 at the
end of this section summarizes the impact fees for recreational services charged by other communities with the
proposed rates of the City. Please note that each community may establish a different LOS standard to meet its
demographic needs for recreation facilities and activities. The City can anticipate variances between other
communities.
$3,500
$3,000 $2,739 $2,984
$2,500
$2,000
$1,500 Surveyed Average:$1,329.00
$1,000
$500
$0
L�e e �� oto�
'V'a o0Q cXe 30
ee � s
a� � ° � e Py ° a� `'
V A � o � e o &
° � C\ °l �,� Q
& ° 0 r ` o
.`a ` 6 p � o
o L` o Go 0 ye a
Cho
6-5
Page I of 1
Section 6
City of Clermont
Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Analysis
List of Tables
Table Description
6-1 Inventory of City Parks and Recreational Facilities
6-2 Summary of Existing Capital Equipment,Vehicles,and Facilities
6-3 Summary of Capital Projects to Improve and Expand
Recreation Services
6-4 Design of Recreation Impact Fee
6-5 Proposed Impact Fees
6-6 Phase-In Schedule
6-7 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Comparison
Pagel of 4
Table 6-1
City of Clermont
Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Analysis
Inventory of City Parks and Recreational Facilities Ill
Line
No. Facility Classification Acres Activity Facilities
1 Regional Parks 219.00
2 Lake Hiawatha Park 219.00 Passive 2 Dog Parks
General Play Ground
Fishing Pier
Canoe/Kayak Launch
Wildlife Observation Platform
Nature/Hiking Trails
Paved Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail
Two Pavilions
Two sets of restrooms
Disc Golf Course
3 Community Parks 88.56
4 Hancock Park 22.80 Active Batting Cages
Softball Field
Soccer Fields
Tennis Courts
General Play Ground
Pavilion
Concession Stand
Two sets of restrooms
5 Palatlakaha Recreation Area 27.39 Active Volleyball Court
Little League Fields
Senior League Fields
Bull Pens
Batting Cages
Football/Soccer Fields
Press Box
Concession Stand
Tennis Courts
Basketball Court
Racquetball Court
Nature Trail
Boardwalk
Canoe Launch
Fishing Pier
Pavilion
Picnic Table
General Play Ground
Exercise and Fitness Trail
Two sets of restrooms
6 Lake Felter Park 13.13 Active Basketball Court
Softball Field
Football/Soccer Field
General Playground
Tennis Court
Restrooms
7 Waterfront Park/Highlander Hut 23.99 Active Basketball Court
General Play Ground
Boardwalk
Paved Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail
Fishing Pier
Picnic Pavilions
Page 2 of 4
Table 6-1
City of Clermont
Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Analysis
Inventory of City Parks and Recreational Facilities Ill
Line
No. Facility Classification Acres Activity Facilities
Picnic Tables
Splash Park
Stage/Event Center
Indoor Meeting/Rental Facility
Grills
Benches
Restrooms
8 Clermont City Center 1.25 Active Restrooms
Kitchen
Event Hall
9 Neighborhood Parks 3&36
10 McKinney Park 5.25 Active Basketball Court
Softball Field
Volleyball Court
General Playground
Pavilion
Picnic Tables
Restrooms
11 Bishop Field 4.00 Active Senior League Field
Batting Cage
Grandstand Seating
Restroom
12 Lakeview Hills Park 3.15 Passive Picnic Tables
Benches
13 West Park 2.39 Active Little League Field
Softball Field
Batting Cages
Concession Stand
Movable Bleachers
Restroom
14 Center Lake Park 12.55 Passive Fitness Trail with Stations
Park Benches
15 Boat Ramp 7.20 Passive Boat Ramps
Restrooms
16 Boat House 1.53 Passive Boat Ramps
17 Kiwanis Park 2.01 Passive General Playground
Swing Set
Benches
Picnic Tables
18 City Hall Park 028 Picnic Tables
19 Mini-Parks 8.39
20 Azalea Park 1.70 Passive Picnic Tables
21 Park of Indian Hills 1.35 Passive Park Benches
Page 3 of 4
Table 6-1
City of Clermont
Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Analysis
Inventory of Cits Parks and Recreational Facilities III
Line
No. Facihty Classification Acres Activitv Facilities
22 West Beach Park 1.05 Passive Swing Set
Fishing Pier
Paved Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail
Picnic Tables
Water Fountain
Restroom
23 Kehlor Park/Clermont Recreation Club 1.03 Active Tennis Court
Shuffle Board
Club House/Senior Center
Restrooms
24 Veterans Park 0.86 Passive Benches
25 Edgewood Place Park 0.72 Active General Play Ground
Swing Set
26 8th Street Trailhead 0.70 Passive Trails
Picnic Tables
Park Benches
Clock Tower
Restrooms
27 Montrose Tat-Lot 0.34 Active 1/2 Basketball Court
General Play Ground
Picnic Table
Benches
28 Chesnut Park 0.34 Active 1/2 Basketball Court
Swing Set
Slide
Picnic Tables
Water Fountain
29 Seminole Park 0.30 Active General Play Ground
Swing Set
Benches
Picnic Tables
30 Open Space 39.77
31 Highland Avenue Corridor Park 1.00 Passive Open Space
32 Lake Minneola Scenic Trail 2.75 Passive Paved Bicycle Trail/Pedestrian Trail
33 Clermont Arts and Rec 25.42 Passive Monument
Parking Lot
Pool
Pickleball Court
Walking Trail
Community Garden
Theaters(Main&Black Box)&Box Office
Gymnasium/Multi-purpose Room
Front Lobby
Rental Rooms
Boys&Girls Club
Commercial Kitchen
Public Restrooms
Dressing/Rehersal Rooms
Storage Room
Page 4 of 4
Table 6-1
City of Clermont
Parka and Recreation Impact Fee Analysis
inventory of City Parks and Recreational Facilities Ill
Line
No. Facilitv Classification Acres Activity Facilities
34 Victory Pointe 10.00 Passive Trails and Observation Tower
Event Stage
Restrooms
35 Historic Village 0.60 Passive Rental Spaces
Historic Buildings
Restrooms
Summary
36 Regional Parks 219.00
37 Community Parks 88.56
38 Neighborhood Parks 38.36
39 Mini-Parks 8.39
40 Open Space 39.77
41 Total Acres in Service 3%.08
Footnotes
[1] Inventory as provided by the City.
Page 1 of 1
Table 6-2
City of Clermont
Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Analysis
Summary of Existing Capital Equipment Vehicles and Facilities
Line Estimated Includable
No. Description Costs[1] Adjustments Costs
Machinery&Equipment
1 General Equipment $877,337 0.0% $0
2 Major Vehicles&Vehicle Related Equipment 210,634 0.0% 0
Other Capital Equipment and Facilities
3 Land,Building and Other Major Capital Equipment 53,217,715 100.0% 53,217,715
4 Subtotal Other Capital Equipment and Facilities $54,305,685 98.0% $53,217,715
5 Grants Funded/Contributed Assets $0 100.0% $0
6 Total Adjusted Existing Capital Investment $54,305,685 98.0% $53,217,715
Footnotes:
[1] Amounts shown based on cost information provided by the City and detailed in Appendix 4.
P.aldl
Tab].6.3
City of Ckrmont
Pad..ad Rcaeatio,Impact Fee An.Irda
o f C hal PraJESJI w Im 1d Rm d Re. ti. Senke
Lure FY 22.27 A4.-d
No. P!2c�i},i,� _.. __.__ FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY2026 FY 2027 Tahl Adj,m . T.Ml
1 H-ock Pak MWtipupoae Field I Rrmosa Cxaa 5)47A15 SO SO f0 SO M S147A15 (5147,015) So
2 Fmea Corot.victory Poore 1601DW 0 0 0 0 0 16%Am 0 16DAOO
3 F ba Optic.et PaIMWIaha PIA 3AW 0 0 0 0 0 3,600 0 3,6W
4 .l)-p d Pi Forme peg Park IOAW 0 0 0 0 0 IOAW 0 ID,ODO
5 CopiBcmna T-Pri.la f.r Clamour City ce. 5,583 0 0 0 0 0 5,593 (5,533) 0
6 Desip&Enna CamwBCooe m Surd.Walafiunt Pad 12.5w 0 0 0 0 0 12,100 0 12,500
7 Art.d.Ree Ceota L41hmdtlg Pmleetion Sy.an 23,771 0 0 0 0 0 23,771 0 23,771
au 8 Repl Co.miaci d pa OnD at Arb A Rec Cmta 1,900 0 0 0 0 0 I'm (1,900) 0
9 Uaed Forkh0.01e Arb d.Re Cem 72W 0 0 0 0 0 72W (7,200) 0
10 Rc. .E -smon a Performmg Ad+Carte 50.000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 50,0W
11 W-1-Commtmicab-Sy. .the Black Boa TbW. IOAm 0 0 0 0 0 Iom (IOAW) 0
12 Shori!lama N.).- .d Leas f the M-0119e Th.. 17,DW 0 0 0 0 0 17,OW (17.000) 0
13 E4 i-4 and Neh,wh,d S-fro Re- Epen.io..Paformmg Aria Cm1a 6,Om 0 0 0 0 0 6,0M 0 6AW
14 Raod Athletic Fick& 0 290,000 140,001 140Am 140ADO I40,0N 850,000 (850,DD0) 0
15 vehicles 0 223,0W 28,000 noon 28AC0 60,0N 367AN (367,000) 0
16 McKitmey Bak ftll Come Re 11- 0 60,000 0 0 0 0 60,000 (60AW) 0
17 NI 11-bed]Bate CI.- 0 8,000 0 0 0 0 BAN (SOW) 0
rmia 18 Te Wanems md 0 11,ODO 0 IO,Om 0 0 2BAN AM) 0
19 Slort lb-Pmjamr CPAC 0 25AW 0 0 0 0 23,0N m(2S, 0) 0
20 Pkkleb.IVF la Na Sy- 0 1,000 0 0 0 0 3,000 0 3,DN
21 ARC Di®W sign 0 0 501
0 0 0 50,000 (50,000) 0
v 22 surd V.11"i 11 C. 0 0 0 204 0 0 20AW 0 20,000
23 Bktk Box Pm)eceor 0 0 0 3AW 0 0 3ADO (31000) 0
24 CPAC VT.O-m-.era-tem 0 D 0 IOAW 0 0 IoAm (IOAW) 0
25 ARC E 4mce Lighting 0 0 25,000 0 0 0 25AN (12.5W) I2,Sm
26 Pad.Playgm ds 0 0 0 .4 -1.: 40.OW 1AM (60Am) 6DAW
27 Splah Pd Re.of- 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 SOAK (SOAW) O
28 H-1,9cmda Box 0 0 5.000 0 0 0 5AW 0 SAW
29 Field Light Lm Coo.- 0 0 0 4W,0D0 40DAM 4W,0W 12WAW (6-4) 6W,OW
i.w 30 Itam.0u61om Cbm- 0 0 10,000 o 0 0 70Am 0 10,000
31 Pad P.114- 0 D 40,0N 40,OW 40AW 40,Om 160A00 0 160ADD
32 ARCICPAC S1dim.Sronng 0 I,IW,OW U 0 0 0 1,100,000 0 I,1mAW
33 K"rPickLeWl Cc- 0 0 g ODO 0 0 0 80,000 0 Km
34 ARC PwideLell Court i Ped®g 0 450,OOD 0 0 0 D 4"1000 0 450AW
35 ARC Field Ara Re om 0 0 2SO10DO 0 0 0 250,Om 0 2SD,000
36 Wm f W Park Field Light 0 0 14D,0N 0 0 0 140.000 0 140AM
37 ARC Wti-II.,poae Field 0 0 300,00(1 0 0 0 3mm0 0 3W.OW
38 gib S Mai.a 0 0 600,000 6WAW 0 0 12WAN 0 I12W.W0
39 Pmpaty Acqumtio.+DI."-1 0 0 1Zow 1,000.MO I)N,WD l000m 4,m0,000 0 4,000.ODO
39 Aq-Facility 0 0 0 6m,000 I,WDAW 600,0W 4,200,m0 0 42W,000
40 eth se-Park 0 0 D 0 0 15AN,000 13,00D,Om (SAW,OW) IWODD
41 Total Capltallmp-ne, f457,569 $2,377,010 SIA68,000 S2,931,N8 MA38,000 517.2M.BM SIO,168,569 gyl I981 SItZMAIII
Fooimta-. - -
[11 Amou.b provided by City WL whielt repraeot®poremenb and tlpgade.m eafs�g 6.iktia end ambm'Iiw ofnew Gcilitin
%i&b will-misting ap Omae raidern of the City.
Page 1 of 1
Table 6-4
City of Clermont
Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Analysis
Desien of Recreation Impact Fee
Line
No. Description Basis
1 Existing Investment in Parks and Recreation [1] $53,217,715
2 Future Investment in Parks and Recreation [2] 22,856,371
3 Previously Grant Funded/Donated Assets [3] (12,284,805)
4 Total Existing and Proposed Investment in Parks and Recreation $63,789,281
5 Estimated Polulation Served
6 Projected 2030 Population [4] 61,133
7 Total Estimated Population Served 61,133
8 Cost per Person Calculation
9 Allocated Costs $63,789,281
10 Projected Buildout Population [41 61,133
11 Cost per Person $1,043.45
Footnotes
[1] Amount derived from Table 6-2.
[21 Amount derived from Table 6-3.
[3] Amount based on information provided by City Staff.
[4] Amount derived from Table 2-1.
Page 1 of I
Table 6-5
City of Clermont
Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Analysis
Proposed Impact Fees
Line Fee per Person per Proposed Existing $Increase! %Increase/
No. Housing Type Person J 1 J Dwelling[2] Impact Fee Impact Fee(SF) (Decrease) (Decrease)
I Residential
2 0-1 Bedroom $1,043.45 1.43 $1,492.00 $1,371.00 $121.00 8.8%
3 2 Bedrooms 1,043.45 2.15 2,243.00 2,048.00 195.00 9.5%
4 3 Bedrooms 1,043.45 2.86 2,984.00 2,739.00 245.00 8.90/c
5 4 Bedrooms 1,043.45 3.58 3,736.00 3,419.00 317.00 9.3%
6 5+Bedrooms 1,043.45 4.30 4,487.00 4,098.00 389.00 9.5%
Footnotes
[1] Derived from Table 6-4.
[2] Derived from Table 2-2.
Page l of l
Table 6-6
City of Clermont
Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Analysis
Phase-In Schedule
Line Existing Proposed %Increase/
No. Housing Type Impact Fee(SF)[I FY 2023 FY 2024 Impact Fee[I] (Decrease)
I Residential
2 0-l Bedroom $1,371.00 $1,431.50 $1,492.00 $1,492.00 8.8%
3 2 Bedrooms 2,048.00 2,145.50 2,243.00 2,243.00 9.5%
4 3 Bedrooms 2,739.00 2,861.50 2,984.00 2,984.00 8.9%
5 4 Bedrooms 3,419.00 3,577.50 3,736.00 3,736.00 9.3%
6 5+Bedrooms 4,098.00 4,292.50 4,487.00 4,487.00 9.5%
Footnotes
[1] Derived from Table 6-5.
Page 1 of 1
Table 6-7
City of Clermont
Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Analysis
Parks and Recreational Services Impact Fee Comparison 11 I
Line Single
No. Description Family
City of Clermont
1 City of Clermont-Existing $2,739.00
2 City of Clermont-Proposed 2,984.00
Other Florida Government Agencies:
3 City of Apopka $1,060.00
4 City of Edgewater 798.97
5 City of Eustis 599.27
6 Toho Water Authority(Kissimmee System) 1,200.00
7 City of Lakeland 3,333.00
8 City of Lake Mary 335.00
9 City of Lake Wales 1,877.47
10 City of Leesburg 358.00
11 City of Minneola 410.00
12 City of Mount Dora 2,814.64
13 City of Ocoee 1,560.00
14 City of St.Cloud 2,865.00
15 City of Tavares 439.99
16 City of Winter Garden 1,300.00
17 City of Winter Haven 980.23
18 Other Florida Governmental Agencies'Average $1,328.77
Footnotes:
[1] Unless otherwise noted,amounts shown reflect impact fees in effect March 2023. This comparison is
intended to show comparable charges for similar service for comparison purposes only and is not
intended to be a complete listing of all rates and charges offered by each listed municipality.
Appendices
8/31/2021 Statutes&Constitution View Statutes:Online Sunshine Appendix 1 - Page 1
Select Year: 2021 Go
The 2021 Florida Statutes
Title XI Chapter 163 View Entire
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL Chapter
RELATIONS PROGRAMS
163.31801 Impact fees; short title; intent; minimum requirements; audits; challenges.—
(1) This section may be cited as the "Florida Impact Fee Act."
(2) The Legislature finds that impact fees are an important source of revenue for a local government to use in
funding the infrastructure necessitated by new growth. The Legislature further finds that impact fees are an
outgrowth of the home rule power of a local government to provide certain services within its jurisdiction. Due to
the growth of impact fee collections and local governments' reliance on impact fees, it is the intent of the
Legislature to ensure that, when a county or municipality adopts an impact fee by ordinance or a special district
adopts an impact fee by resolution, the governing authority complies with this section.
(9 For purposes of this section, the term:
(a) "Infrastructure" means a fixed capital expenditure or fixed capital outlay, excluding the cost of repairs or
maintenance, associated with the construction, reconstruction, or improvement of public facilities that have a life
expectancy of at least 5 years; related land acquisition, land improvement, design, engineering, and permitting
costs; and other related construction costs required to bring the public facility into service. The term also includes
a fire department vehicle. an emergency medical service vehicle, a sheriff's office vehicle, a police department
vehicle, a school bus as defined in s. 1006.25, and the equipment necessary to outfit the vehicle or bus for its
official use. For independent special fire control districts, the term includes new facilities as defined in s.
191. 9(4).
(b) "Public facilities" has the same meaning as in s. 163.3164 and includes emergency medical, fire, and law
enforcement facilities.
(4) At a minimum, each local government that adopts and collects an impact fee by ordinance and each special
district that adopts, collects, and administers an impact fee by resolution must:
(a) Ensure that the calculation of the impact fee is based on the most recent and localized data.
(b) Provide for accounting and reporting of impact fee collections and expenditures and account for the
revenues and expenditures of such impact fee in a separate accounting fund.
(c) Limit administrative charges for the collection of impact fees to actual costs.
(d) Provide notice at least 90 days before the effective date of an ordinance or resolution imposing a new or
increased impact fee. A local government is not required to wait 90 days to decrease, suspend, or eliminate an
impact fee. Unless the result is to reduce the total mitigation costs or impact fees imposed on an applicant, new or
increased impact fees may not apply to current or pending permit applications submitted before the effective date
of a new or increased impact fee.
(e) Ensure that collection of the impact fee may not be required to occur earlier than the date of issuance of
the building permit for the property that is subject to the fee.
(f) Ensure that the impact fee is proportional and reasonably connected to, or has a rational nexus with, the
need for additional capital facilities and the increased impact generated by the new residential or commercial
construction.
(g) Ensure that the impact fee is proportional and reasonably connected to, or has a rational nexus with, the
expenditures of the funds collected and the benefits accruing to the new residential or nonresidential
www leg_state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0100-0199/0163/Sections/0163 31801.htmi 1/3
8/31/2021 Statutes&Constitution Mew Statutes:Online Sunshine Appendix 1 - Page 2
construction.
(h) Specifically earmark funds collected under the impact fee for use in acquiring, constructing, or improving
capital facilities to benefit new users.
(i) Ensure that revenues generated by the impact fee are not used, in whole or in part, to pay existing debt or
for previously approved projects unless the expenditure is reasonably connected to, or has a rational nexus with,
the increased impact generated by the new residential or nonresidential construction.
(5)(a) Notwithstanding any charter provision, comprehensive plan policy, ordinance, development order,
development permit, or resolution, the local government or special district must credit against the collection of
the impact fee any contribution, whether identified in a proportionate share agreement or other form of exaction,
related to public facilities or infrastructure, including land dedication, site planning and design, or construction.
Any contribution must be applied on a dollar-for-dollar basis at fair market value to reduce any impact fee
collected for the general category or class of public facilities or infrastructure for which the contribution was
made.
(b) If a local government or special district does not charge and collect an impact fee for the general category
or class of public facilities or infrastructure contributed, a credit may not be applied under paragraph (a).
(6) A local government, school district, or special district may increase an impact fee only as provided in this
subsection.
(a) An impact fee may be increased only pursuant to a plan for the imposition, collection, and use of the
increased impact fees which complies with this section.
(b) An increase to a current impact fee rate of not more than 25 percent of the current rate must be
implemented in two equal annual increments beginning with the date on which the increased fee is adopted.
(c) An increase to a current impact fee rate which exceeds 25 percent but is not more than 50 percent of the
current rate must be implemented in four equal installments beginning with the date the increased fee is adopted.
(d) An impact fee increase may not exceed 50 percent of the current impact fee rate.
(e) An impact fee may not be increased more than once every 4 years.
(f) An impact fee may not be increased retroactively for a previous or current fiscal or calendar year.
(g) A local government, school district, or special district may increase an impact fee rate beyond the phase-in
Limitations established under paragraph (b), paragraph (c), paragraph (d), or paragraph (e) by establishing the
need for such increase in full compliance with the requirements of subsection (4), provided the following criteria
are met:
1. A demonstrated-need study justifying any increase in excess of those authorized in paragraph (b), paragraph
(c), paragraph (d), or paragraph (e) has been completed within the 12 months before the adoption of the impact
fee increase and expressly demonstrates the extraordinary circumstances necessitating the need to exceed the
phase-in limitations.
2. The local government jurisdiction has held not less than two publicly noticed workshops dedicated to the
extraordinary circumstances necessitating the need to exceed the phase-in limitations set forth in paragraph (b),
paragraph (c), paragraph (d), or paragraph (e).
3. The impact fee increase ordinance is approved by at least a two-thirds vote of the governing body.
(h) This subsection operates retroactively to January 1, 2021.
(7) If an impact fee is increased, the holder of any impact fee credits, whether such credits are granted under
s. 163,3180 s. 380.06, or otherwise, which were in existence before the increase, is entitled to the full benefit of
the intensity or density prepaid by the credit balance as of the date it was first established.
(8) A local government, school district, or special district must submit with its annual financial report required
under s. 218.32 or its financial audit report required under s. 218.39 a separate affidavit signed by its chief
financial officer or, if there is no chief financial officer, its executive officer attesting, to the best of his or her
knowledge, that all impact fees were collected and expended by the local government, school district, or special
district, or were collected and expended on its behalf, in full compliance with the spending period provision in the
Local ordinance or resolution, and that funds expended from each impact fee account were used only to acquire,
construct, or improve specific infrastructure needs.
www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0100-0199/0163/Sections/0163.31801.html 2/3
8/31/2021 Statutes&Constitution:View Statutes:Online Sunshine Appendix 1 - Page 3
(9) In any action challenging an impact fee or the government's failure to provide required dollar-for-doltar
credits for the payment of impact fees as provided in s. 163,3180(6)(h)2.b., the government has the burden of
proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the imposition or amount of the fee or credit meets the
requirements of state legal precedent and this section. The court may not use a deferential standard for the
benefit of the government.
(10) Impact fee credits are assignable and transferable at anytime after establishment from one development
or parcel to any other that is within the same impact fee zone or impact fee district or that is within an adjoining
impact fee zone or impact fee district within the same local government jurisdiction and which receives benefits
from the improvement or contribution that generated the credits. This subsection applies to all impact fee credits
regardless of whether the credits were established before or after June 4, 2021.
(11) A county, municipality, or special district may provide an exception or waiver for an impact fee for the
development or construction of housing that is affordable, as defined in s. 420.9071. If a county, municipality, or
special district provides such an exception or waiver, it is not required to use any revenues to offset the impact.
(12) This section does not apply to water and sewer connection fees.
(13) In addition to the items that must be reported in the annual financial reports under s. 1Z 8.32, a local
government, school district, or special district must report all of the following information on all impact fees
charged:
(a) The specific purpose of the impact fee, including the specific infrastructure needs to be met, including, but
not limited to, transportation, parks, water, sewer, and schools.
(b) The impact fee schedule policy describing the method of calculating impact fees, such as flat fees, tiered
scales based on number of bedrooms, or tiered scales based on square footage.
(c) The amount assessed for each purpose and for each type of dwelling.
(d) The total amount of impact fees charged by type of dwelling.
(e) Each exception and waiver provided for construction or development of housing that is affordable.
History.—s.9,ch.2006-218;s. 1,ch.2009-49;s.5,ch.2009-96;s.5,ch.2011.14;s. 1,ch.2011-149;s. 1,ch.2019-106;s.5,ch.2019-
165;s. 5,ch. 2020.27;s. 1,ch.2020-58;ss. 1,2,ch.2021-63.
Copyright 0 1995-202.1 The Florida Legislature • Privacy Statement • Contact Us
www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0100-0199/0163/Sections/0163.31801.html 3/3
pwign
Appmdl.2
Clry eT 0-1
1blk.Snvk4.Imp4..Fn Aud)>.4
B.e ry 9f E.i.Mn4 P.Mlce(:4p1441 Ea9lomen..Vehi.ks vnd F.dlldn III
Linc Est U»ht LTD Awv A-1 All-l- Mwhiverya Fwili6w a Odx' T4W
No. Ms54 Dnc A% Acq.Curt Lifa 0.Pneu.i Fwro. Emicmm M.im Vchidc. C.O.1 Epip9ml Esludd Hulmiavl C9n
1 5009 2007 FORD CROWN VICTOR IA 42150 2N2007 $3 U73 5 S3%m V.hidn So $31.273 m m S31,273
2 5010 20O7 CHEVY VAN 02151 2/162007 33,153 5 33,153 Vchido 0 33,153 0 0 31.153
3 5045 RESTRAINT CHAIR 12420oll 1454 5 1454 Mub.a Equip. 1454 0 0 0 1.454
4 3053 PROLITE LASER W/PAD 5/162008 Z545 5 2.545 M.4cb a Equip. 2,545 0 0 0 2}45
5 5054 PROLRE LASER W/PAD 51IG2o08 2,U5 5 2,315 W. aEgcp. 2.545 0 0 0 2,343
6 5114 LOTS 71.9,10 BLK M PARTIAL FS 41 9/30,1991 ID],034 100 0 Fwih- 0 0 102,0M 0 lo2,034
7 32() 2o05 OMC SAVANA VAN 47 I40 12422004 16,593 10 16.593 Vchidc. 0 16.595 0 0 16,95
1 6039 CCMAMUN ITY RELATIONS TRA ILER 47413 91742003 4,2W 10 4TW Mwh aFwgp. 4j90 0 0 0 1290
9 61)58 LIBERTY GUN SAFE 122.200. 1,599 10 1,599 M4ch aF.qu.p. 1,599 0 0 0 1999
10 6063 K-9 VEHICLE EQUIPMENT/CAGE 2R7/1004 2,611 7 7,b18 M4ch aF.gop. 7,61t 0 0 0 1,618
11 6DS7 REPORTING SOFTWARE UPGRADE //162004 1,839 5 I,83/ Mwh A EgNip. 1.831 0 0 0 I i38
I2 6010 (4)POLICE BICYCLES 1Irl42o04 5,200 5 5.700 Mwh AEq.ip. 5200 0 0 0 5,200
I) 6111
PRGIASER 111 LASER UNIT 1123/1003 3.113 5 3.113 M4ch t Eq..p. 3,1I3 0 0 0 3.113
11 6111 STALKER LASER UNIT 129/2o05 1,I95 S 3.195 Mwh.aF:q'ip. ),195 0 0 0 3.195
IS 6126 EVIDENCE SPACE SAVER SHELVING SYSTEM 314.7006 7.892 7 7.192 M.N.AFRip. 7,/92 0 p 0 7,192
16 6165 COMPUTERS 5/42o07 19,191 S 19.191 Mwh aFq.ip. 19,59I 0 0 o 19,191
17 6169 C( PUTERS 1N.2007 25,572 5 25,SJ2 Mwh!Equip 23,527 0 0 0 25 f72
11 6170 COMPUTERS //102007 11,392 5 11."2 Mwb a Equip, I I'N2 0 0 0 11.92
19 6N7 l(XK01EVYMALIBU 42123 10.2009 19,164 5 19,164 Vehido 0 ll.:14 0 0 19,161
20 6354 10o9 CHEVY
MALIBU 42122 1/3r1009 21,134 S 21,I34 V.hida 0 J1.134 0 0 21,IN
21 6361 2009 SPEED AWARENESS TRAILER 49007 2204009 smo S 8.440 M.ch AEquip. 8440 0 0 o 8,440
22 640E DR DO PRO DATA STORAGE DEVICE LSR010 I b65 5 1,665 Mwb a 6yip 1,665 0 0 0 1,665
I3 6431 2010 DOIX:P.CHARGER 12174 9rl07010 11,619 S 26,699 Veh id. 0 21,619 0 21,W9
24 M32 2010 DODGE CHARGER 02175 9/3M011 23.130 S 23,13o VdA. 0 23.130 0 13.130
25 6491 2011 STEALTH APACHE GOLF CART II15R010 ..994 5 127Y34 M-b aEglip 12.994 0 0 12991
26 6492 MINI MATRIX MESSAGE BOARD TRAILER 12LZ011 16,113 5 16.815 Mwh!Equip 16.915 0 0 0 16.115
27 6338 2011 DODGE CHARGER 12179 7rt1r1011 37,113 5 71,743 V.hida 0 32.743 0 0 32.1/3
21 6390 2012 FORD FUSION S-421K YIb/]012 19473 5 19473 Vchidn 0 19,473 0 0 19.71
29 6791 101J FORD FUSIONHYBRID82181 l/164017 26,889 5 26.88Y Vchidn 0 76,889 0 0 ]6,i19
30 666E 2013 FORD EXPLORER KA UNTI4218[ &am- 38,944 3 31.944 Vchido 0 38944 0 0 319M
ll 6667 2013 FORD fNTF.RCEPTOR TAURUS I2185 V2/1013 31,398 3 31 J91 Vchido 0 34.398 0 0 3/,391
32 6668 2013 FORD INTERCEPTOR TALRUS 42184 l2/IO13 34.398 3 U'39 Vchicla 0 N.798 0 0 34,398
33 6669 2013 FORD fNTERCEPTOR EXPLORER NJ116 lRr2o13 27,419 3 n!19 v.hida 0 27419 0 0 37.419
34 4707 NIKON D710O DSLR CAMERA 13-140MM 7/I5r3014 1,397 5 1,3V M.d�.a Fq.,iP. IJ97 0 0 0 1797
35 6708 NIKON NID71 Oo7LK CAMERA 5/157014 116T 5 1,697 Mcch.A Eg ip, I/A7 0 0 0 1.697
M 6755 2014 HURLEY DAVIDSON MOTORCYCLE42191 3/57014 2J,309 5 23,J09 Valid. 0 23.309 0 0 23,309
37 6756 20M HA
DAVIDSON MOTORCYCLE 47191 S/5.7014 26,133 5 26,153 Vchkln 0 2b.15J 0 0 26,15J
38 6757 2014 FORD FUSION S 421IN SB!2014 18,377 5 IIa77 Vchkln 0 18.377 0 0 It,377
3v 676E 2014 FORD EXPLORER 42190 7NR014 ]1,611 S 11,611 Vchido 0 31,611 0 0 31,611
40 6767 2014 FORD TAURUS INTERCEPTOR 4219E 41ZOM 37,941 5 32941 Vehclo 0 32,911 0 a 32,911
41 6769 2014 FORD TAURUS INTERCEPTOR 42194 7131R014 26,92U 5 28.920 Vchidc 0 28,920 0 0 28,920
d2 6770 W 14 DODGE CHARGER 42193 62 12 33,413 5 3J 415 VN I. 0 33,115 0 0 33A I3
43 6793 2008 CADILLAC CTS 47188 3/26r20I4 N,30! 5 11103 V,hidc. 0 14)03 0 0 14,303
44 6104 AUTOMATED EXTERNAL DEFIURlIAATOR(ALU) 771/1015 IU82 5 1,082 Much lEy.P. 1.082 o 0 o 1,082
4.5 6105 AUTOMATED EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATOR(AED) 7/1/101] 1,082 5 IUBZ M.ch.Egaip. 1,082 0 0 0 I,OB]
46 610E AUTOMATED EXTERNAL DEFIBR11.UlOR(AED) 7/I.ZDIS 1,o&2 5 1,082 Mwh.Egnp. IU87 0 0 0 1,017
47 6107 AUTOMAT EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATOR(AEU) 7.'IRl4U 1,082 5 1082 Mwh.Egnp. 1.082 0 0 0 1,087
41 6939 AUTOMATED EXTERNAL OF.F IBRILIATOR(AEU) 7/1r7U15 1,081 5 1M2 Mwh.Egnp. 1,082 0 0 0 1,082
49 6" AUTOMATED EXTERN AL DE FT BRILLATOR(AEU) 7/U7015 1,082 5 Ip82 M.ch.Equip, 1,082 0 0 0 1,087
SO 6110 AUTOMATED EXTERNAL DEFlBRII.LATOR(AEU) 711/701, 1.08'. Im M.ch ahgip. 1,082 0 0 0 I,017
51 6111 AUTOMAT ED EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATOR(AEU) 7/I/2015 1,082 - 1092 Mwh.F: ; IpE2 0 0 0 I.ou
52 1111 AUTOMATED EXTERNAL DFFlBR)LLATOR(AED) 7/1no1s 1,087 5 13482 Mwh.Equp. IA82 0 0 0 I,OII
53 6813 AUT.TED EXTERNAL DF.FIBRJL IATOR(AED) l/Il7015 1,087 13182 Mwh&Eq.i P. Ip11 0 0 0 I,OII
54 6814 AUI( TED EXTERNAL DEFIBRILL3TOR(AED) 7/1/7015 1,087 - 13182 Mwh.Eq,P. 1,082 0 0 0 1,012
��q �qN Rry3't� n p'L
nnnnmR'"-�nn^R T.R�RRRRRRz(RnAR
r
....................0 o e e o................e...........
0
B
g6 eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeoeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
eeeeeeeeeeRe& ^q=� _2 'Inn
R RRRn e oRARR nA���� n�R �R�RRRRRRRYE�'i?iR
3
_ee eeoveeeeeeeeee
22
p wW 8�3a�93�s� 99 �989J'U�3 � �A3���ava��
9 <LL rrrrrrrrrr < €r�ryrr ����rrrg3��>1>4 fi>'3"�>>> >>>@'$>>>
2,1��ol�an��gn$SC
RRRRR '- F;R;R ; pRRRRaRRRSRRR
V E �
a
� ---- =A"^R'�,R��-R'O �RRRR^ �R^KRnRRRRRRRRRRR
g ^^^�^Sa �a'aaa� � aaaaa�3�aw�Saaa�a��aa555'a5 "a`'a
0
ecccc ®
�3�333 Ao
hm_Imym ym_�ms��i2 ��2 g s s an.,�mm0'o rv�a' rr Snn�
x��o5z�aoz d uu u �57»a uuuW uuu
5 gg
Hill
�
MR
ggy�z@e@ �
E : yoqoSo sYo ooQo SS S S�bSPS�oS $3R222
«<1
1
YY � «3�rv�� R�xRR�Ri<<RRRRRR� R«R3RRRRrRRRRRr2Rn
y�l RRrxxsnaaaa��a���s��,.�G€�s<mez:;�ms<aaaada�;.��so_aasBso
E=sEE`sxErnESxa�=awzWw=-sirEiMYEsmiZx Zia EEEE$a:iww.-cW5s8
m-E ssssaao�ssssggagT�>< R aa&&&& ��x�x�u
m �mti r � S tititiHti ti ti yytiti y 5 O >� A"'�
_MR�^���P�~������ �S� QoQoogoog000aaQoo������ '-`5�AS2
} sa a »e.a.. a s as
---- €
ssww ----------- I� c
b b b b b b +8 g g
§We t `essL-e==� xxauss m
a
MAR►R����R'�°r.S"a"a.S"rS"a°d.9.'�,wwwARaaRi►NPApAARRwwRrww
994i�CCCC$ CSCC C . :44E4f4E444f4444449999'84'B
�a'Y�a��eeee�eeeeeeeeeee��a�aaaaaaaasaaaaasaaaWWW�ee�ee§e
R
neee0000000eeee............�XeX o
n
R
E=
mB
A
o e e e o o e e o 0 o e o 0 0 0 0........................0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e e e e
Q
F
�E
�Y�L:§��e����b4'.o..g�.r,4pp���x3affiSSffi'.d 4SS a`aaas`s a$�sssaoEx>We� � A
a»»>>
- mA > = , 66 � eE"" �"��
O O O� y>
gzdo e1ro' . mnnnp
P � 6 ��`��z�'��'�n z �n25'a °x�$$� nz�Zzozooa
0 o a� ASH ��P
� A nnnnnnnnn y,� �y$�"�nnn> or��a�aaE
zpmw nnymmmmmm ym ym����Of p°;,, cccc
C y sgn n;�,a "r. 00009y00 ySZ > (>' P-1 P-1 Al P-1y-,w°m i°nM t°n Cgs a
° oeoo oSSS�m EE �,oe°z Nm �Ym„LL>L
LHIM.
m p m Q M v o K P P T r r r r
01 Ina Higis Muni
HUM
e� "zzzz o �o
w '
_ s
�IFg�>S�YMYYxYoo�YCYYYK::3of.owu��Y8W�Y8YMkk�k�.'�8����P:SB> H
7
k
neooae^tYY'e'_"3W
.............
g
s
R R a a R►►P P R►P F.P R N.P P P b►P P LP P P P R P►P P P P P P P R P P R¢:�Pn P�Pn�P+P P►P P P g
Z �
�SoeiF�kYSeYeneoe.e......o�eS�W��B�YY&Y�TS13kwe�8w,.www....> P
'C
ee�Seeeee$eeeeeeeeeoeeee�eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeoeeeee 8
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeveeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee` eeeeeeeeee
'a
x
c
1�gaSS}FalF:Y��oo's as mmm ds4useQWWYP-Z---Z :9suGeGC£C� x
o»»»»»»»»_ws»:»aMYegGee:rar:»wren»»sMr»tiC»�SeeeG»w=sn:� �€�
SS�F$�£�$B�rFFrFrFr�rFF�888�o�pp_.e._���AAAAAAAAA oQklr�f»
s�y��t',tSiSt����RRRRRRRR t;�� y> y�yt <` mzf �5yz����o� Sn
aAM
o�o
�P� 4
Vxx -- UU Skkkw.. s
IxVVg V�TouMe g
.,.we----..,.,.,.,.,.,.M,.,...,. -----------
X
S
M p p gy�pn+p p�pn M p►p p p P A�n►P P M M►P P P P Z P�S^'- 6�'S'P P P p P P P P P P P g g g P P P P P p p ' R
m�
Y
zi .ee>eeeiir� f�iseee» uae -p
A
"XXX% 7K�j�
L
oeooeeeeee000000eeeeee000 eeeee.==eeoo...
E a.
�$p
e e e e oo o o o c o o c e e o e e e e e e e e e e e o o o o o o o. -e e ee e e e_e e e e even 9p
8
d
x
B E
I�
HH HE��a` £iig� SSSSSSSSS���yy,�s KKSrKr CCCC[[CCCC �C�CC''�O000000o
ps
�;fi gn5g AA
gxg>g�ggxggkggg•gxg>g�giggcigg"�� ��s���e<K�K<�K KK
RI'M N
o°oS O3aa 8gg88889898888889988g
0000000000000S�00000 F���� ��-�2���2
S?ssssss03
�eeee8e NNNNN-N-NNNE'eCEC'Fee-N -geee,e
7 E
Yee
"ssewsWW��zgW�Wz3gWWWgW��Wz�����YYrrr ��ww- ----== '
P P R M P R P P R R P P R R R►R R P P R R R M A R R M A R R A A A A P A A A A P P P R R P P►A A►►A A a'
m�
R
m R
................o e o e e e e e e e e o..........e............... 8
S
F
000000000000000000000eeeeevooa00000eee0000eoeeeo - _0000
7
9
II- 00000eoeoo o 000eoee.—— oeveee000 o oeo 0000eooeeeeoe000e
�a
LLu
Q 000e000000e00000eooe00000eoee0000000eee o 000eeooee0000e
3
6
wwwwwwwWwwwgwawwWW��...............WWWW����W��w$WWW�W�
<LL rerdrrrrarr�d�<♦r�arar•rrr+c+aroarrrr�•w�a���•r��r�r«r�
ILI
-s4 ssssssssgsssssssssssssssssssssssss ass
g
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 o v o o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0
X
OO +E��4�4^�4.�1,�k�L�(q$'.�,14d,�¢KT.'�d,•Fd,.'�6,2•gd, .�`^{����{���"ei 2BCo{Yot< •n� n
3333a3Eba�bba33d33E3333�333333332X�a�2dd338e3d�3a33Re�
8 a'a_aaaa_a_aaaaaaaaaaa_aaaa_aaazaa'aa"a_aaa'a_aaaaaaaaaaa�_-----
4?44$Q4496400000000000c000000000000000000000000000000 0
M R11 212 HIM M1O9 l�
KEEL`g LICE �dxdddgkiSXKdddggddddddd`a:L`.xa'Oegi ggkad.bx,%xxrE
33333333333333333333333333's 333333333333336363336655363336
555555555555535355535555355555S555S5553355555555355
ttt ttt €€E.5 ....hutub€. u 0 u .00 ru,tttEttt
UVV uuu
? r...gm.'.��Mm��:��� �����:�..�.-�����R�a`-�a38in gin•-$y%rnnn%r^d,�=«��ry'+'
F
x
oeeoeoeeeee0000v00000000eeeeeeee0000eeoevovvovvvvvvvve
6 vvvoo= •=00000000vee_ _ o 000000000000000000000
tl-
'3
0000000v000000eoe000000v0000 00000eovv.,«00000vvv
y �d3r-'�d8 F-8
R:RR::R aissR
a
8 d d 6 v c c
a . E� W wwWWW�
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrar« arrrrrretlr rrtltltlrr
<W ¢¢ 1 {��{ yydyya yy -d dyysa syy syy dsyyJy,``��``��''� •�'`J$'$> '8 > yy
>>�I >>�
IR
G
" „
„xa „xxxxaa �aa �nnnnrRn.a=-»a�
u �� �� opt--------- Z�r---
aaa$a'aa_----------aaa_aa�S__Sa
a
oa
0
a a
000000000000000000000000000 xmK
ccoo-c" 'c-o 5 BSoo-ecocc SSg:^??««^ 8�o z
a aaaaaaaaaaaasaaaasaaaaaaaa�$�$$
SSS353353533SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSgg$$ $ , , W, �
u uuuuuuuuuuuuV'u uc3 Fi'u ciuu�L'u-uuS,9«.o.«R.v.RAF-i-at.t.t-r..t-RRRSX<«i-<
a
B .................a000——..............0000 —........
d
�a
a
..............................
ov.......
o ............
d ------- as--------"R i t=-^ R�= ---- ------m`---
�W
4
g 464 addddeaav>da.e.e.�.aaa as
<W wY�tl mtl�tl�d Wtl Ytl'�tl vda Yd7 d��tl�d�Y Wd Wtl�tl utlz Wtl��Y uY4 wtl uiVt tl&4144
1tl 4tli utla Y Y V—Y YtlWV9,;1Y
W W'WWsu3WW w
tl tl tl tl Y Y tl tl tl tl d Y Y d Y Y Y tl tl d d
MUM IMMIll
............0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ol -------^���-�------����.��i�i���a__��in=��.^"a6.^`,•�'�&��"66Ee66Ga
a
Rb�bs�R�����R RggR e����oo -��-gR��g�g� Sses�Rb^orr�o
ss soss
�mw MUM o�LLAO
W V U U U U U U V U U V U
0555555aWWWW�_r����c���a'7�37����d �� � ss8��g�mmmmmgmmm
a
� _e�����$s���ss�asB��3��3333��ss"seossiesoan74e�:���a�«
7rr XMt1
Append,2
Cily.f Clean-!
Pclke S—i—Imp..!F.
I 9f E6,mz FuLi,C W I F I VWcIm unil FAdWgS III
E.,U.&I LTDA— A—,All— MPchinery& Fecilidu a Ott- TOW
No. A—,N D—ri,ia We Am. Aug.C- Lif. O.'..im;. F. EgpiPwlt MJa Vghiak. C.piW E4iuuml Excluded Hipried Cal
1/7 9132 BODYWORK CAMERA AND HOLSTER 127 mo 3,671 S 0 M-h.&Equip. 3.671 0 0 0 3A71
ISS 1933 WDYWORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER 12a2m 1.671 S 0 Msb&Equip. 3,671 0 0 0 3.671
439 913/ BODYWORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER 12R11030 IA71 ! 0 M.6.&Equip. 3,671 0 0 0 3A71
490 IS35 BODYWORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER I21=() 3.671 1 0 M.cb.&Equip. 3,671 0 0 0 3.671
/91 $836 BODYWORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER 12fY1000 3.671 S 0 M.6&Equip 3,671 0 0 0 7,671
193 /137 BODYWORK CAMERA AND HOLSTER 1]MO20 3.671 S 0 Mch.A Equip 3,671 0 0 0 3,671
493 /{31 BODYWORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER 1211.l020 3,671 S 0 M.ch AEquip. 3,671 0 0 0 7,67I
494 1139 BODYWORK CAMERA AND HOLSTER 124/7020 3.671 S 0 lki b&Equip 3,671 0 0 0 3A71
495 /MO BODYWORN CAMIRA AND HOLSTER 12/2/1010 3.671 S 0 %I b A Equip, 3,671 0 0 0 IA71
196 //11 RWYWORN CAM ERA AND HOLSTER 12=020 3.671 S 0 M.rb AEquip, 3.671 0 0 0 3,671
497 S842 BODYWORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER 12%7010 3,671 1 0 M-h 11 Equip, 3.671 0 0 0 3.67
198 3643 BODYWORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER I2M020 3,671 S 0 M.ch.a Equip. 3.671 0 0 0
4W MN BODYWORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER 12almo 3,671 ! 0 M.ch.A Equip. 3.671 0 0 0 3,671
50a INS BODYWORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER 12N7010 3,611 1 0 M.ch.d Equip. 3,671 0 0 0 1.671
Nll $8/6 BODYWORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER I2M020 3.671 ! 0 Mmb.A Equip. ],671 0 0 0 3.671
502 PM7 BODYWORN CAMERA AND HOLST Ek 12MW0 3.671 1 0 11-1.A Equip. 3.671 0 0 0 3,671
503 PMP BWYWORNCAMERAANDHOLSTER 12PW010 3,67I 1 0 M".a Equip, 3,671 0 0 0 3.671
Net 8M9 BODY-WORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER 12R/2020 3.671 3 0 M.cb.A Equip. 3.671 0 0 0 3,671
k13 8950 BODY�ORN CAMERA ANDHOLSTER 12=020 3,671 1 0 Msh.&Equip. 3,671 0 0 0
SUE 8951 13WY' ORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER 1=020 3.671 S 0 M .A Equip. 3.671 0 0 0 3,671
507 M52 BODYWORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER 12M020 3,671 S 0 Much.a Equip. 3.671 0 0 0 3.671
SOP ee51 BONDYWORN CAMERA AND HO1Sl ER 12WO10 3,671 S 0 M.N.a Equip. 3.671 0 0 0 3.671
SOD ee54 BWYWORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER IM020 3.671 S 0 Mrb.A Equip. 1.671 0 0 0 3.671
510 e155 BODYp ORNCAMERAA?7 DHOLSTEk 12== 3,671 5 0 M.N.AEquip. J,671 0 0 0 3,671
511 885E HWYV.'ORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER 12/2/2020 3,671 5 0 Mual.a Equip. 3,671 0 0 0 3.671
512 8957 RWl'WOkN CAMERA AND HOLSTER 12,JFJM 3,671 5 0 M.d.a Equip. 3.671 0 0 0 3,6T
SIJ eesP dWVN'ORN GMEM AND HOLSTER 12OR020 7,671 1 0 Mr6.a Equip. 3.671 0 0 0 7,671
511 8859 BWYWORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER 1227020 3.671 3 0 M.rt.A Equip. 3,671 0 0 0 3.971
515 M60 BODYWORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER 1 2020 3,671 S 0 MrA.•Equip. 3.67) 0 0 0 3,671
516 BM1 BOOYWORN CAMERAANDHOLSTER 1=7020 3,671 S 0 Mn !Equip. 5.671 6 0 0 3A71
517 1M2 BODYWORK CAMERA AND HOLSTER 12/22020 3471 3 0 M.A AEquip. 3,671 0 0 0 SO:
518 IM3 BODYWORK CAMERA AND HOLSTER t2MM0 3A71 3 0 Mall.&Equip. 1.671 0 0 0 3A71
519 9864 BODYWORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER 12AR010 3A71 3 0 M.A'A Equip 7,671 0 0 0 3A71
520 8M5 BWYWORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER 12.OR030 J,671 3 0 Muud.a Equip. 3,671 0 0 0 1/71
321 8966 BWYWORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER 12a=20 3.671 S 0 M.rh AEquip. 3.671 0 0 0 3,671
522 8967 BWYWOKN CAMERA AND HOLSTER 12/M020 3.671 3 0 M.A&Egeip. 3.671 0 0 0 3.671
513 6961 BWYWORN CAMERAANDHOLSTER 124MM 3.671 S M":Equip. 3.671 0 0 0 3.671
511 8969 BODYWORN CAMERA AND HOLSTER 1=020 3,671 S 0 Mal tEquip. 3.671 0 0 0 3.671
525 $670 BODYWORNGMERAAND HOLSTER 12M020 3,671 S 0 M.r6.&Equip
. I'll 0 0 0 1,171
526 /171 BODYWORK CAMERA AND HOLSTER 12M020 3,671 S 0 M.ch&Equip. 1,671 0 0 0 7,671
SP $972 BODYWORN CAM ANDHOL ER 12R.2020 3,671 3 0 M..6.A Equip. 3,671 0 0 0 3b71
528 9973 WDYWORN CAMERA ANDX0.STER I2/1A020 1,671 3 0 MWu.&Equip. 3,671 0 0 0 7}71
529 8174 BODYWORK CAMERA AND HOLSTER 12MM 3,671 3 0 M.ch.&Fq.iP 3.671 0 0 0 3A71
530 8875 BODYWORNCAMERA AND HOLSTER ILb]020 3.671 S 0 M"&Equip 1.671 0 0 0 31671
531 9811 DIGITAL ALLY ADDED TO EJDSTLNO VEHICLF 1=019 LOSS 3 2$33 Ma.&Equip
6,053 0 0 0 LOSS
532 SS15 TASER X26P L'11,]011 L,320 3 0 M-h.&Equip I,RO 0 0 0 IAW
533 5186 TASER X26P Al 12D21 I)20 3 0 M"A Equip. I'm 0 0 0 I—As
SM S//7 TASER 7126P 6�1112021 1.320 S 0 M.c6.&Equip 1.Sw 0 0 0 I.320
535 3909 DELL LATITUDE 5110 LAPTOP ILI510211 1,131 1 0 M.ch.AEglip I,t3/
536 3910 DELL LATITUDE SI IO LAPTOP 1.111207D 1,134 3 0 M.ch.&Equip 1,L' 0 0 0 I.IN
537 1911 DELL LATITUDE M 10 LAPTOP 1115.1020 3,134 3 0 M.ch.&Equip 1.134 0 0 0 1.1.
53e 1911 DELLLATI DE5110LAPTOP 1115]D2D 1.134 3 0 M.ch A Equip 1,134 0 0 0 I,UI
5J9 1911 DELL LATTUDE51101APTGI IV15,702D 1.134 3 0 Mrk&Eq,ip I,i31 0 0 0 1,134
510 191, DELL LATITUDE 3110 LAPTOP 1115.7020 1.134 J 0 M.<h.t Equip 1,131 0 0 0 1,134
�� a�53aM�Wti�x$ ^&s2aNa�as�6����eGus�a�a�s4 �
N IR
$gip FFI >>>.A" p
e sasasasa�����Ap=°°� s� ��sssssss�°�� ss
gy-11-i�1-i.i-1-1-I-i Oman
n byp ssyg ee��rr rr��rr��rr�� r¢¢ ,°�0>0>py CC WHO
pvpO
am a u�4TZZ m�T
s z� 00000s�yz �YS°yy SSSSSSS'" SS
�oo-o'o`o°m
e-- ---'- - N� Nae�Wv FNN ��
9�gaga �sxss��s? ssssass�ss
a ssoos0000aox000e� x�
---------- . .eWUWW.......
r p >
r� o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e e o 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 033 0 0 0 0 0 o e 2
�EEs�aEc smmmmmm,�mmmmmmmmmmmmmm�
$ vooe0000������amamm��:����3sa3��3��3�YY R
y R
T i2"J'"CC C iS�• ¢:
� �§'&w�§'ds000veev0000000v000voaa0000sooso
5.
x Ea
. ev0000000eoeee000000cc0000000000a000000 9
g
S ooveesooa>s00000.00000v................
a
L aaa5�al�a '+;w:w�����:..• —1J is Li
xWeeWsua asast«««'asi$Seazz saaga ygx a§ii
..:��=21$29&&YYH°iS YY�Yw Y.".",_aadSRai.S6'E2Y�kUY�tt-%M77Y�Ytld"m���m3:��-�.-+.�-.•..- I 5
g� g� y�g;g�rpp p pyppgyyrp prryrrrrynr rrrrrrrrrp rryELyryyryyrrEyrr(ger�5ppy r6y6yrFyr5
tltl 99�999594§4�§�9§A9§444p�g44§{44§§4§�4E{{{{99g9��499�9�9��9�{9{99��99�9�!
344 91�SSfiifl9fl �i 7i�a3 �a l fi4fiSflfi��fi�6899119ifi1i195g 1.v111S a a 1111 111Ill Ill III
?t i9 & 31rrrs9§i9101 9 ill 919sgeee1§y1999ix�gs�i19R-III!e�Ii!IixII19 99'4?YI$g:'II
HUM !I In 4vin
lvoomw'� 'p'-pl
I�
HIM �gwiffiffill K��$ g,g�
assess sass ss��� m
aaaaadaasaaRRedaeRddeaedaeaaaaadedandddaadaddaaddaaaaaadRdaeeaegaaa�sassaaea I�
8
§�9�§s9999���@���5���"@999�e99a"gg599ff9gg999ff��g99g3gg9N�git9�g99999d�9g�9�tl�g9 �
4
z III II oil 1111
aaaa:aaaa aaa aaa a_ :a22:Yaazaaaaaa
4Y i9
I
D �
g E
KRv�x Q YY E$ §'' aaa=eaaaaSSS3§_ §S7"cPse s@4=6'ag§3esaasaaas§=e$9E%��6.94_-tmm
.....,.,.....a..,,.,.,..,....aaa..a...a---------.M,.,.,.aaaaaaaaeeaaaa..a��caeeaaBsaa
flie I��
e.....e.ex§�9zsas:cttgggsagT�$��§�$$3E4��s9§D'3`RsaA"RRiiFi`�P.16RY��. QwG=...§ 3
............ ............ ........
�e��C�C��$$?��#�"nn�s.-.`�'§yySeS�3x=arS§�6688XR��O�7�B�SRddddddd��3;Y8,,,ee,.eeeeeees p.
eeeeeeeeeee..............eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee..............................s
�6
t€
_ e
_rE"�aSYM�B-g` R
eeeeeeeeeeee........................eeeeeeeee.......eee.ee.o4��gk9�='.��g� � d
....e..eeee...eeeeeeeeee..e....................e..............eeeeeeeeeeeea
�'C�iL uY..B�Q♦y yyy is mby C5y5y r lYi_y__ _ _=i g Ip�
:.a if w AOAR �'S O�:eUDB CC =Yi���sRRRRdSRR Y��® HIM!=�SQ 3 R
isai�FnF-e-a--ea65xa�-a-aa9&fi.5acnz$--nn$56s:�i-c:�ccses9-ae49898gaasSYaa�819aSGEaa�Bily�Yl
���������������������3a �����$�E��eee3e��a aia`aa`s`�`Ea�`a`a►`atrrrrrrrrr
1��assa4a?�s��assa5@�e'��Yga3gF�e�4$g8a5�5az�ssae$�x ?�49r�y�a��9a833����se"e
I�
t r-f "i6G ttttga- nIN HIM,aaaaaeg"ease aeeo
J baa a
�.ij �
pig
EaSbRGab6A6aaaeLdRLdEdd dff88d6ERaERSSEaEEA8Es8E6ddEslSSSlSS6lEE8SbEasaaslal6elp
0
Q
5
aaaaa��am;�a��a��aa��an»>�saaamaa��a�na��anamamaa��a� � �a�aaa����-�aa�a�
aaaa�s�aaaaanaaa�aaaa_aaaaa_aaaaa_-e_n_a��a_anaa_�eaan a aaaaa�aaae��������9 r
F
-PaPP -__rrrADrr =y-r-aXrrrr.rr--rAxSerxYrAP��srYtn�=ap9=9a5_p @
"e:�es3-33��`eae'a�MM14Y��E�QY7�a�EB859��o����Y�e93!'.9�����isy��Y9:x4'�����s�9$�er
..........saaasc��o,..a...,..... --- ----......
HUM I
- - r- -rrr y e�llllY
�3���x9ECF#7tFbssesasFaF�F£gcF-cg�FB�SK�YYiX�E�EeeFFSEe[[FF5F9Ki:9F9c`§s3s�9a5EaxaE9_9999c9499�a�3Ee96eFeFe�eceeFFog t
�s�9�4��E��6€�4466EC�c6ss�§46564444��9��.< 4444��49 [
Y iS L it= ly a�ae=� xisYS to Y4a �4$ ? 8� �a��...........................rF
eeeeeeeoeo.ee...... .................0002P'Y Sa �x60SS K=l a�?bff$4$ies'��b9Yeeee... el
of
................................e............................ ,..............
.......................................................................... .I
s£Fx-=W==NZeaee Rig��"$#3Y-Iiff t EE-OM Q csbi1e5SCm99 lag mHWIXI NN OR H—Hiwi5
�o�i8gpg"aa=Yi�x"ca�offi�g��3x���as'ai'suss'a6�sasea'eaSayY�rad�as-seE6iceees"r'sxmxsxl
tFri 9 fill igill
sa�aa�aaa�a� y a� g �sp :pp�F41611g1p�q���sY91"M MUM IH41441514M1415140
IMP
�
66 YTt r� A o3 9 �`E f.££E SF E iF.... Tg 222itit3 ; aa
���
Q L�R> 'S L`7S L`lS iS� S �SS>> 666�£4~ w
��U �� iii�6 S a $
f�6 P t5B6fdia�t 2 Up � 6 i
assaaz e
� e .. taaza�ee
eaaeeeaeeeeeeaeaeeeaaeeaaesesaaseaeeaaaeeeeeeaeaeaeaaaaeeeeeeeeeeaaaeaaaaeeel�
8
5
��a��aea�amm��a�eanaaa�na�n�p� a� �aaa��aaa�aa�a�am�naa�aaaaaaaa � a
������•aeesaetee_aasaa�e________e_e�essssssea�:esaasse_aanesaaas_sasaaaaaaaa
e
�����ep_ ee 9
E�Saa�������a�������a�e a 555 "`-�j`55•�"-�=•••• ss S55LCLklY y' L!! YYY�
F
e$1111HRIM151111 II ISO adeals! Q9�Guy:��ae:pYaai�Sta�Yxi�il:'�dil�G6���5�
.,.,.,............a.a......aa ......................a..........,.,....,...,.:.--------------
u SUP
;�_• u yu. .
"anM5y'>sy7a�?:gcP111sip..... M . ."�r2�"ski§9I""I�zYYLtt HisisE?
€'�'����'��'�'#'€£fffffffffffff�'ffff�'fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff°?
HIY6aHHUM1`a1MoaIaa amiss 16 mill H xM51:hiiiae94�lei!lcg�il3l5����i���w
............................................................................
�6pp
.......................................................................... . d
AJ�'�'�r1�X��xi�ey�e "mail158ESS-.$. .y� — i '--'----- . Q. .
L11H U �
a��......................................
DB996o e
1r 8N181f{ Ero A.a AReeO.n AttWtr+>< r.olm.ar. raG
Cervr _ ,fa1 pm,p,^' C CD SW 4mam lmealsevgOm MAH Mdl, ]+6 Dpmm Fwa Np.]w. Mw wnxl. <pW rg..pm S.md N,uvalCm
]a Nml+m - 1!Is f PwvAsoNriwcfvM 9fslol- _-b mom-IB� wTtOrlAwR+ IYIO'101P�i,fT-r ss lrna 1].s o ]f5
]H AATma iprlar PAVABJNIC TOIe)16M HRI Q aN IOm In fiwTie+AOl.ml I]IInAl9 llU f )fl Afr,l6pp if]! 0 L]U
TIC Apnr.E�r 1!11 }A�'ASOMC}pUOIOM LIW m aw 10m FRE l:wTlOM A01@I nDlo'n ].Nf f asl 1Yd+ai�.D irU0 0 UU
Dt AfPlr fi'Ar 1!IA }AYA]ONK rp{g1flM110] b a 10m )tE SIAIII]ACOY1 ILSo'I] ],N] 1 a!l aYd aiy,p iN3 0 LNf
ID ADPr.Hf]Ipm MN RA:TEYt'PoMSeHI q.OWIIt m a01 NM IM Ilr T AtW Yf/f0]0 11tl S ]AS ]rh aRYl LIm 0 iltl
D]AIP�Ir 6m'r'r S!s1 CRA.L�INADNT...M.l Vf w.': Q W ]Rll fIIS IIAl1[Nq YIIU010 LON 1 I71 Ab<B�.P lON 0 O 101a
'DI AaP...Eppr SI,'Za EVAC�'ATCT'TIWtI < a0l ]>w f➢QSIAIOCq YI V]OID IUS 1 11) Kd.etip.p
D1 APPr.EOePr WI M.l.!I GAS�SC1GIlfVSlT82vl tl a0f ]]w Nm3]AIIWq YIY1m0 I,q] 1 IW Mwway.D 14R 0 0 0 1,01
ll6 AF )A>°Pr >Pa AR.I.'1 GA3066 ECTUI1Mn10N: tl f0f ] (WR IIATIWq YI)Tl0 I,IW ! 7) MA lBgwp I,Itl C J 0 I,Ib
nI Aypa.r+By.Pw Itq IMnGAS 06]E[iwl l]DIIIONt f0 aDf lM IQ8-nisIlq YI)ROb LqD ! R AIIA d6m+p I,Im C 0 b
DI AfpYv EpCnr 1591 ulanOAS E6:SROe 10]lLe7v1 tl {01 7>m SYIB IIATIQ]q YIYA]0 I.lb 1 n AYA lEyp I.IQ I,Itl
Ds Aypew EOOSImr f19r 111L:I CA3 MQRIm1 tl 100 ]m F86IIAT101tl YW1m0 4115 s 271 AW.[fi0rvp 4115 0 411f
]aD A{prO.Eptsr ISsI !lUa'fiLA1 PRO}AM p1TT010 Dt Q q1 ]tl] IeQ IIAiplq YI l.)m0 L{M f ID lOA aFgap I,tll 0 0 0 I,KI
Nl A)paxv Fpo]mr Lei ll8v(.UE YIT m fCf 1IDl FBtC HATWq UIYJWO 1l.Sb 1 NrT l6]LLp I5.510 0 0 0 I1.fm
N] I-
A Ibl A-- HGDT CgM.84 S.'STWI m aW ]ml imPSTATQ]F 1W1VJOm {Am 1 AW,l6p,rp lOm 0 0 0 SOOP
N) Ip„T,er BODx C00.IlG STS]fN] Q fW DH rBfCSTATBNQ IWIVNF 6.m0 S SIpA aEMp 4m0 0 0 0 40Q
perAelS AGt( m {DI DW IOtF IIATRNq lI0]OY :,HS S AIIG,l6py rt15 0 0 0 I.H!
215 A�El-- IFY ]C8n MA44 CIfwYNO SYSiDf Sl MIDS rBtE SIATRe1 ADI�f UO'Nl4 1,DJ f Arl,a 6qup ]]m 0 0 f.1b
]]6 APPIU EIoRr bm Y8] t4 c:SwVDIG fYfTS?Im mf IW! rID15fATiN KMf 11/q'i0Y f.110 ! ]✓1.l6puP SJIC 0 0 IAN
]I App,.Ir E,Bufmr IICI EATJEAVOR f)]4T'.a5al ]Oa bW IIDF SfwT10Nq ]Ylf OatC I.W) f P4A.lEp.p i.OD 0 0 1,0D
A ApPlu Bmysr Illl L�iGSW]NA T683/] Q aDI )]W r9E SfwTf)Ilq I7nf/IO.o I.W) ! 0 NM.IFgy :.OD C 0 Iprl
F AIvr+Ey,pnr 111J H. WxSlma]n tl fw ffi:' rIItE SfAtDlq 1Nl/fOtc ].aD ! 0 Md+aiq..p ;.OL 0 0 1,011
lm APmrm�6m.Pr IIN E�OFwiM Y0.lTaxs Al tl f01 '!IDl r20.E Sfw]iWq 1NI8010 I,OD ! 0 AYA eeq.p 1,0D 0 0 IAl)
Dl/OR.n.fiwPr SOCwu'Gt]+9u'CW F fw lIDl Sel[SlAlYB]al -
1]n10mc 4<I] tl 0 fi.A apµ'; �w 0 D 1.
D]Appru 6Pusr FM SAW."`A'GPi]1wr 011 m aw ]IDI P:nE SIATDN{I 1NIn0c 41M 10 0 AWt.<bAap ).{« 0 0 I, Ha
]N ApRm�6w;rr F9 TeEWCMYR AC®OR14t q A0f >ml S>q-.S!ATR81{I 1»I'gID Ltlf ! 0 IaA.afiw'D 1W5 0 0 I, LSF
ISf AP'u lim AIX IIQOI00. q a0a ]]M ftIQ T,ATQIH N10011 I,III S 0 14G.dfim:p I,llt 0 0 4 1))I
DS AO -ay,Pr AIIACY110fR B(ttRf q AM IW1 _.A-Al1RW YISIIJ}I iltl IS 0 NuA IEPOP I,Im 0 0 0 I,Itl
]16 AOmr,.p.w..n DCSn CYI1VUFF8 BCfilL tl aDA Itl1 i8[S IIAI>alAdOi YIY1031 I,Itl IS 0 MM.afilve m 0 0 0 I,Itl
yT NOInu EauPr AW CYIATXR MITIE m aw IOM 1'ilIe MASSQ]AMOi YIYNrI w IS 0 Wd.a60Ap IJm 0 0 0 I,Itl
]N AF EOma�r A6A LYIP]OmI BOTI]E m aof IOW I'JQ IIAiIR)ApB) YISRmI `.Iw 15 0 AbA lEmy I,Itl 0 0 0 I,Ib
IsI App�mv 14 a MS]CYIlSLFAB(I'.TIE M IQI MH RATRf M.Hf YIYM21 LIW IS tY.A t6yp I.IQ 0 0 0 I,Iq
]tl Aq�u+6aDimr fW CY11VDfR BO:t]E aN IDW iL83SATQrAp.Hl Yl=l I.w IS 0 liA..5" I.I. 0 0 0 I,Itl
]61 AW.m�EA,']er W]CTINDfR3+Smf51W] apf IOQ NeESAT4rAEe.Q) YIY1W1 IVIO IS AW.ae0e0 Nf00 0 0 K-
l9 ApPftr Fgorr sOb PRHAwSE fifCAP6 PAA WA 1Cf IOm f1R6IIAra+AI))W YISDOfI 1,b0 ! NIIh•Eyp LIm 0 0 l.Itl
9 A]pru Spppn bll A191AY46YAPE PALT WA 4H IOw lTEIIAT)AI titIC: YI5Itl11 LItl S I)10.lFqup Lltl 0 0 ).ftl
N ApP�tu iggor PP.9fw]IE ES[Nf PALS ImA f0A IOm FFE IIATLN A�tlI YIYAtI itl0 I Afrl.aeppp l,lW 0 0 0 i)tl
M•)yqw f{yar 0.V) PNDfAm6I>ICwR PAS WA m aoa IWS iZF RAT)lt]AD)wl YISPmI i700 ! C Ab,t.a(yup ism 0 0 1ftl
Y App.w Epyw 9w) IRHAnelli 68CAK PIA WA m a mm MSSATSN AIR.131 YI1Zll 1100 1 C MM aEpµ zw 0 0 iltl
App..r f.A.pr 9011 PRHfAQE CX'.VCPAA WA F ImS fOtE T.Ai1CN ML@f YIYMI iltl 1 1-15P z.
6t 0 0 1.110
9 ApD��'.f.PCpe�+ f4Mf PRHAAw[fSAP6 PA(%WA C N mf f3F 5IAIYM wCIH1 YI11q]I itll S 0 111A.♦EMD L)JO 0 0 1,m0
W App.,u F.mpew sort PRDLAQEiX'Ap6 PAI]()ASA m a ms fIRE S:ATS]+wdmf YIYMI i)tl f 0 AIIA.aAwP LIm 0 o i)tl
F Aq�+u EYPr W)I A b aDf IW5 SA'S SlAIYB]AC001 YlYgll Ltlf IS 0 A4A a6µp i(eL 0 0 ),016
RR PwL
T; Alyew FquPr Soh RR PwO:)AA q fN {WE IIArI(8]wW.m1 YIYMt i0tl If 0 NrA<AyP i01e 0 0 I'm
R App,.u.6p,�vl 94M Rif PA[]:WA f0 N f4a TiAl10N A0Ad S/IfIJHI 1016 11 I'm
C 11N liyp I,DH 0 0 0
]R ApDrufy,p�r 0.R Rn PA[>WA f0 fw lQE 3[wl TA0101 YIYg11 lOb IS D Wd.aE�r,p ]wf 0 0 0 ),Q6
>rf ADI�,u Ei"S�r W:PwJ:I.4A Q aw SSA)Ye]MAW YIYtlt1 SWa 11 0 AaM l6lpry 4m 0 0 0 laH
l>J Appar 6p.A.r RP pA�:WA m aN Imf PQE SInT)T'AUI.QI YIY)!]I iwf I! a WS.lEYO aQf o a 4wa
ltf ADmnr E.P.,rr 5®AAC[ESSC33S q apI Imf PIIETAf[IN AONN 51179011 a 5 3 1 liA.<Hµp easm 0 0 a4]m
lT Appulr 6prr PJsI !®ANA q aN IIM i➢E STwieT'AOd YIIRWI ).RI I! 0 Ire.<RpD 413f 0 0 0 A]b
lR Appnllnf .n sC]] SF1iCQIfAll'l®8e5An�A'c AwAeAM SIL3: tl fW I065 i1eF STwiIw:AI8n1 YIfIIQ) 4WI IS J AYJ t6puD fw' D 0 0 4WI
lA/OTtr Efgmr 9p5 SEIF CCHfAChD DAEA'ImAT-n TIH PAfm AC fa wm iQf 3rAt1']N8I]] YIY)gl 4WI IS J AW,lEwq awl 0 0 0 4wl
Q AwrrCgrgmr 1016 SilE Re)IAD�aeSATMOxtwWNATIfIPAW( q apI Ib! illlE eiATP'AALN YlYtltl Owl IS 0 AI10+l6m,p awl 0 0 0 4WI
]II Aypv.0 6p]mr 6LF LfRMI®8)FATIWC ARAUMPKk f0. Iq5 1WE nniICT MMH YIYIm: 40DI IS MIA a6µD Owl D 0 0 Awl
lR AWvlm 6gymes PO4 118E CGRAeGD BAEAT1mtG ARARATIO PALM Q fw lam iDE SfA1KN wD]CII 1Rlatll 4WI IS )a.a,a6yp 4WI D 0 0 {.wl
))Apmt]r fgslmcl 90m Ja{CA)TAO'®aAE.1!)IwC ATNATIA PK% O Iw 10W pDF 3TAMll:.•LBCM YIYSW: 6wl I] Mi,<fflrs 6wl 0 0 C.Wi
IA AP F.iI'omr mfa SETS fAIfALI®HRFwh:PG wPPARATLOl IAC1t q IOI Ib3 F3E STw :AINN YIflq)] EWI If W6<fymp 4WI 0 0 i.Wl
SS Appnb 6ga}a�] 90!1 BDf CQRACOD BRWTI{OJG AWAIIATCOMA Q 101 IWS IS£STA:ICM M•l'N SIIYmII f,Wl If f{ItA aEE awl
Se Appru 6p.pm bf] i)33'[pRXM ~83LAnWIG AM AA q M, Im5 SID1Siw]Ip:IlIO� YIYIDlI 4W1 IS MId,a6µp Owl D 0 0 4w1
ft A)eru 6Av�m m!) utl.cOM1AbA HefiASIIDiG NPARl1A 1AO( < ]OI IOW i➢tS SiwMR:AL OI YIYJ01 4WI IS N..),a6WP 4w1 0 0 0 4W1
11 A]Orr 6mTr 903E S9P CAMAGV®BeGT1wl6 AAARAIN PALS: a0 aW IWf I3E IIA:O]Aw1O1 YIYDII (WI 11 A4M a4µA 4w1 0 0 4WI
F ryp,.r A0.�1 9053 SEIF CprtAf]bGelWAilwq AAARAIIlS PAL% q Imf 181E IIAlIW A[Tm1 Yllfgel IL-11! MIA aF}w 6w1 0 0 4w:
]s0 Apl.nr fa�wf f0]a SE13 C'OMA➢Oa)eRWLIm1G AAMArIO PA(Y q 1W5 f3E S]AEICN AINw LIYDHI 4WI 13 0 AYA aEpuP Owl 0 0 6As1
Wt At1a..r 6>.pwv 9m1 SQ}CCIMALN.DRSEI.T-AWARAIUSPACK fOm STR6IIATOlADAW YlYml Owl U 0 AaIA lLµP 4wr 1 0 4W1
Fl APPIu6 r tl!1 sf CCeRAE.eD HeenTNwOAPPw1U VAC% tl Iw Om Ee1E IIATIIM AIMGN YIYIDII 4WI 1! 0 WA l6pP 4WD 0 0 Owl
FI A1pnr La.Prf 90!D ..+sCCffIAOeD Bee.]TfOIG AWARAIIA PACY k Iw Imo 1'J16IIATRef AL40+ YIYFtI Z. If 0 Alr,l6gyr 4wr 0 0 0 4w1
}s]AptruE.tep.r 90D0 SIIS CUMACIffI A,u_fT-MAlAfl15 PAL1. AO fw Ibf 38t6 SiwIbN MAW YIYID31 4wr Is 0 )w lFgvp 4wr 0 0 0 a,Wl
M1 --[.f�... m6i fEIr GYRRAC4f HeEAT!WG APPARATUS PACTC b fp IODs ielfi IIwt]W Ab.m1 N1RWI Owl If
A PmA lfqup 4wr 0 0 0 4Wl
lsa APDrr E� :. mrcv+rAca;n eae]rluw APPwewTlB Pnt>r .o am Ims fHF HAnn+.uns LI1ROl1 awl I1 M.A ae],r,P 4wr D o D apll
]OT APpnA�6s��:; Sf]FCUNTMIDBR&1PWlGAWARATID PAL]( AO )Op lD3 gATI0N AA4 YINWI 4WI IS 0 MA lEqup 4Wr 0 0 D a,Wl
]91 AWlnu b]mvsr 59F CQRAL'6D ee6ATUWO AAARATN PACY b Imf )46 Hw1%Rl AtML YIYMf Owl If 0 NA alpry 4wr 0 0 0 Osl
l•.s APPI^m 80A{],c: Sblr CTMSAPTS HxF i8Dt0 APPARATUS PALM tl IOm fieS IIATIONAWCI S'IS'lml 4WI I� 0 ]IAA<6pnp 4Wr 0 0 0 a,Wl
lw Apmnm Epssv_ Sf1FCW+iA1`SD IPi.]THalO AWAMM PACt tl f01 Im5 NRE"A-Abcv S'IYICII 4WI IS 0 NIA<8]Ap 6,wr 0 0 0 4W1
)ol APpPnm Hp�s_ DCaI sRF CVMAASDHe&]TN]l3 MPMwrUS PACX fm IOW f186 IIATRef ADfAw YI1R0]I awl 11 0 1-aEqus 4wr 0 O 0 awl
1.AP E..Iwm: sDa sElA a?rIu'1naREAnu+c ARwewTIA PA4x AOI lam iBW IIATpN Mom+ vlvul 4WI a a].A<Ep„P atx'. o o a,Wl
)0)APMm6pv+c: I- f311'CVnAP lIs- WAWwMT1A PMR AO Aw IOm iPb IIA}KN AUAW vIY61 awl If 0 Mq lEWs 4wr 0 0 0 4WI
:rya``azu"a.ai�5� [��§iFac "x is =x5E5FxEx�Y Yee 5=gxbg_a � ----------
R 8d9A9HAS? 7l149°;SRH?4R
�f�`� 96+ -.8Y9BF4E9 r
� g .no s.
aaacaaaR+sasaaeaaeeaaeeeeaaeeeaaaaaeeeeeeeeeeenaaaaaeaaaeeanaaecaaaaaaceaeseelp
8
��¢Ef444€€44€ff4f44#4f44f44f4Q�44E4444444��¢�F�S4�9Q44Y�Y�4�{��4YY4�Y����{4 YI�
4
�aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaPa�aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa�
a�xxxxxx�:axmxxaxyygxxgaxxxx�aexxxxx�amxxgxgxgxxaxxx x xe��xxxxxxxaaxxaxxxxxaxxxxjg
-_eY:Ye _Y_nneseaa__�•s----'_nn»_»�»��»»_a � x��$��3������3�������������a i
Fit
n666bpy_ti=geker_rretie�g��y66yti�x�i�yi�ykye��ti���_�Z�g�g'a_a_''s.'s_s_""9_as""9_'9_"aa.as's_�g'9_�"s_"9_s'a_a's_"9_st�6
_....._,...,........__..,._,......._,.,.,..._----.....,...,.,._.....,.,..,.ao.=s.=ccccc�sasaccsc=cccaa==�SE
33333333333933333339apyaagq �9�9a9939S9iU�a�� . i36......................ee3'
...€ ...€..... . .0....€..€.€.€.EEEf�€EEC€€
�f#f.'f.f.....63;.f.�fi..£.'i€.'€ifi'.£fff��'fi€�'�'����€���f�€��f�i��'�'f€€i'�'i�f�'�f�'i�
------ - ---- -----_ _ ---
aueeeb6aeetih�E�etirrxrS�a��C_� ytykSrsta�k�6ei,�a $s899s$599ssa89999a$s499tP
..................a...........................fiC� ........................
P
000eee000.........eeeeee.eo..e........e.............eeeeee.................
..e....ee.00e..oe.........o...................................... ...........I�
C SCS CZi}Jbitli l3C tltf isb tlticC555 Slit ft�eb}35}755555ShSti�rrrtif LSB��8�B8$§�$'g 5$$$$e$9�$@$�8$flE
�I-------------gG.r@,TI,TC------------:i-Tj^^FL%IZ'1^R-- R�1�RRR^^�.�IR'f'117�A�1�lnlKnR n^�iR R�lR ry+l
bev.........................................................................
.............. .....................................................e......
..................................................... . --------------------
Inn-nn _
w..••..r.r.rwr.r r..r.rr•r..w r . rrrrrrr
J$I6®§F§Ie�FS6®lii®a"w5u6Sd�$$=`==3»:»c........."c"-cc"":"-"--":»v"-..-."::':
�I--------------4Xft,-.--n���j�ltinnn__nn_ inn2 nn7_'nw1w�7�=7=7'=----
17777��������
9� SSS SSSSS SS SSS ,F. SSSSS SS4SSSwSS
-------------
'tCkG FGGFGG CCCCGGF
�I�aa�aas€aa�aaaaaaa��a���s���aa��a����aaaaa€€€�$a�eaaa�aaa����€$ao����aa�aaaa
��G999iYY44449V44949YJii9GiPY?99P9Y44Y49•Y9YPY77YYY9U99494VV9iPLYY9Y4Y4Y94YYY
� S���Sga���E��
� MUMMER
eeeeE
�IFxxxx?x`x2xxxxti[F r4 FCF$`2Bb77667R_FCZRRFRRi:GC3�iC.LY:S.8iC8wLR�4Aa �C CC
�EEEEEEEE€€€€€EaE€EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE€E€€EEEEEEEEEEEfEEEEfEEEEkEEEEfEEEfffffffff
i �ec°�a�s:iLaxR$$£#§k'£9aBS$§4Q4g:5cc:::::=.$v6vcC$v's$$="c"cc"c:"^.^.'oY:33i"sY?iS$s "as'r
5 RRRRRLRRRRRRRRRRRRR-------i---- .ve__vayn------------------------- a. -------
Io a eeeeoeoeeee000000e ooceoeeeeeeooeeeeeeoeeeeeeee00000eoeeeeeeeeeoaeoaeeeeeo
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee0000000000eooee000eeeee00000
�3
9S
l0000e0000eeo---------------oe000eeeeeeeeee000000------------------------eoae
��I$466S�ssff"YvSS'v+i�a$9!£xass$�����x�a:c:^e.82xxdx—z'zRxRxatzi��lYc�1YgXISIs.sassssFF
------------------------------
----------
- ----------
--------i---- ----------
q
Va e4��7���������������Sl'CCCCCCCCSCC���������CCCC�CCCCCCCC:ccccccccccc@��4�@9R��
�fiKfififi»»fi»k»rkkkkkKkkk»»»»»K»KK»»kkKK'e kkfifififiKfi KfifiKKkkkKKkfikkkfikCKkfik»kkKkkkkfi
B
eY4;YZY??Y?ZY4444YYYYSYYYYYY4YYYYYYY?YYYi?YZ?9Z?????ZZ7744ZYY99Y4GGVY9YG9YYYY
Him ifilklifil
HWHR
MH1e5p
3 eee�n � ���a333 3 MUM"�e�ee��c��333��33�333333�eee.....
Mm
�ICCCCCCGCIIF.:CCZCCCC L� CCCCYCCLLCC2^ez=-.E:C u u2 cnfln-ss$C$cecCCCL•E
b
b
j I: Z. Y$Y$Y$i R5 ee Acf FIS tS?"e 1e"e 4e"e 6 1$f AiF a AA%��.o^,.�.:, .e^.�wr G,^e�RR.R S�jS�a E a R RR
3444$3gAii§#��iisiSYci:T'iH_�y��X.Y',.Y3�=ud'Fj�K��j�MKlt�rd:��SY.�"..w=%:YYV'�Y�YYYE�f��XMT��Is
4��4444AAA9AA9 �`
fill if Y
x�
a I
aaaaaaasaseeeaaaaaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaasaaeaaaaaaaaeaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa�ot
B
fs-s's'sf'sfffffffff93444f4ffff444f4ff444444444444444444444444444444444444444444�
������99��y`J7 '.tl7��777••�53� �J"'�q:'��J.u.uZ"�'��'"�'��J'^9�`J`J�9�y"�...uuu�'��J�9""�9�'��:p
3
saw +.aaa ____bZSa
i33fi333aeatg§e;w3kfffccc�cccc§c§°§§§'Sccca§3i333§§§§§§§§§§§§_§§§§§§L_e'stdF6[�
SS°SH5?�❑��55�1E�Ca .................................................
nesasesca
4E€EEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEE#�EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE€EEEE€EEEEEEFEEEEE.�
................ ......................................................... .I°
aF
.,.........................................................................
.......................................................................... .I
ji
�ITSfSS£3.3F_f,F_f,�f,�fF.FSfSSF.ff.3.F5.g.F.Fff.5.F.S.S�YFgSg"sYgf.fFeTfFfF.F.S.Y3Sggf.F,3Ff:'s�3is'fi�2
8
Io ooeee----------------------------------------
o............oov000v.........
v.e.e.e........................o..................eve....................e
r�
----------------------- ----------------------------------------------
--------------
�a
7�Y,3's'7.SYttSYSi3.5.3�Yt i333tYI��F�35�Y Y 3YJ,?s.Fg"sJt��t�3f.�.I3Y.�5.3 T�YTSri.FY,Y.F.S,Fi.es.i.'
e oeoe.ee.o 0000000ee00000eeeeeeeeee0000.o.0000eeevvvveeoovee...
s3_YYSSSSY'7sY"s,S,Y;I?YTSSS'sYY.Y.YYYSSSSSSY"a,555'sY'aiIFYYfSY5553SY�iftSSYfSSl�gggFfSYfYF
�J ♦:J:J:J::..••.•.•.JJJ....•..JJJ:..J......JJ............• J:YY:JH
-------------
t� SSS
d pCCCQQC:Q:7:::: CCCC C C P CCC Q Q CQQQQ Q C C Q CCi i ii ¢Gi:CCCCCQCCc
kkGkkKkKKkkKKkkkkkkkkkkkkkKk KKkkkkKkkkkKkkkKGkGGk Gkkkkkkkkkk kktkkKkKkk
si#GK sik �ss#2'I
kss#sssssssassiIIssss
�IYa§§§sag§§�ga�aYg�ggaag�agYapga§Y�§�§gaaaagaaaaYaaaaaaaaaaaaaagYaa�YY�Y��YYY
�I9 PPPPP9P PPPPPPPPP9PPYPPP4PP4PPPPPPPYPYPP4PPPPYPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPYPP99PY
i4s�isss�5�5���###s�sss#s5#ss�s######s��44s�is"�ssi�5s#�i���55sssssss####�5�„
ill MUM I H§sae#€HIM i§#ii__Ell ME!_________________________________#
�3&&&�9549d33���9�5A9A�ddds�5H3§dd�9,§§�9&:§k���9d§���39��� ��9�9��6939�9�3�93
� �§$baobab==enRn?'�,saaraFaae"a aaneaaflaaa3af3aaaan"a:"a3<ad�888���8�Yao„F.'e'sada�$a"ai
Be.e-g3gg�S��.Y g�ffi��$i��3Y3�4Sg�,l SS=°��:,s gesee;z�,gs
�E —
I.ee.ee.eases.e----------
**.......
e--------------- �I
. ..........ease.................... ...........
33
E�
...............**.......
..ee......... `1
2� MtltltltltltltltltltltltltltltltltltltltltlMtltltltltltltltltltltltl3�tltltltltltltltltltltl
Ry?:pR-R��.�RF.E�'�.k��'(P��R�R�RRRE�R�RR9YJ�^RRRRRRS„Rp^
��I XC iK.�wi
g��.�,i�a�3l3����.�3��.�.�����,3�9�•__g�ssccsv_= g}
s
Ja ylrc:Yccccccccc:@�� cccca4ccccc@@44@g@cc�R@�@�cc444
kKKKKKkKKFFFFFkFK�FKKFFkkkkkkkKkkkkkkkFFFKkkkkFkk
1
�Iagsag;ggagagaaagagggggaa§§ghaaaaaaagaggggggggq$§gq
�I9 QYYY?QY99i444499?9?Y94YYQ9Y?i9999iQ99SIYQYQV?BYaY
c
oilii921aIIIIIII§IIIIIIIIIIIIHII1 1191 1118,p HUMS.
a
Q
�§sH&e§���5656E�¢as2s"ss�s''"c���3aII�gL�:"r�nii3igisg��� S
a
fi SA6YB64Ag CgY➢CY666A➢gBA 6gA g6g..i iCi➢6Y➢66ggEBBgg �
fi @@@ 4 h 6fifi fifi6fi4h 4hsaaaaaaa
i
IHB�F�"A�F^=^aa"ad�s�$e$��x35§?��?.��o<w�ixivss�:°a§ff"ss$sRH�s3�RxS�E«a`aG«-���R
e eeee��eeeeeo�eoeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee000 e0000e.....,00eeeeeeRR
ge� � ee #�� � g2$y&6s%�ana�E�4gFz3Rg _3_35 $jai Rs' xt $ee
i
$eeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee..eeeeeeeeeeeee---------------------- eeeeeeeeveeeeeeee
_ oeaeseeeeeeeeeeeee...,eeeeee.ovo.,00seeoeaee°e°eeeeveeeeee°eeeeeeeeeeeeeveeee
FA 8Rgq988863p8X=6Ea8 p8p PaC6888888888856g6g88888888s888888888886868888888886888888BR8H8
4 R8 9f_-_ A #RiItfSRRYakk
'O RAOeeo=ooMooR^�..R.-o9oogg000g00000000000ueoe0000000e_eeeeesee----------------
e aeveeeee00000eo
A
L {
6�6HBHBBHHo=FS8R8:88II98868888888898888H898888888888868888fl88H6888H9886888R888
i,i,i,&,g�ag2a°"a�"A"s&e�$E$66ii^S $^-E"a$,i€. 8,ki,i,?€iRiFs�9"s=Qg.SS73iu8ia�x&�a6�ax�_i59F
k
E'-cHda_H_-�--� --"
ar
aasasa`- Yaa=as-aae c_ fisafisasfiiiii:fi iaiaiiaaaiS:YiSawaaaSGS:
k------- ------ ------ e�Li ►�i M211flin
�R i i
� x�-----
RR'n ARzaR R..A9:7:a:870i9:,Ra.xaaRRWBae:a^„768sRGFFARR
6 S L- 8 R x 4 RRR^ F^^ Z LR_TxRR
ae��Y `A'k33eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee-ee-----ee„e ------Yee-eee--ee-
s
9
=�000000eooee----------""oeoo-----------------a"o------.------------- ^o^v^"e00
0-o-oo-- e0000eee----------o--eoo---------oe--- � ---o--;--eoo--------�o ^
A'a
tl tltltl 00 tltltltl � etl tltl�� tltltltltl � tltltl
jjilimillull
�86888B88s8668888688g8g88888:886888888'_8R888AHx88o8R8=:=Ac8C87=ax7i:8FA=BBSRR�
------vv-.00v000-ovovo-eo ovov o ovvov0000^^oovovo--oe"^..vo ..o^.-
''� 88888886x88888868888888888868888888^=BR8888Sk88II8Z8=C=A:BxBCeR:.ZFGS7x868888A
�� Qa�EH3, ^oxs�a�IIa-a a_Yq�$s•a79 R7_x9?� lEYYs�Y'so£$AAaF4 _ ��$38xF"rYYs°€ IIR=3xY^
a� x -AYaFf
Pe
V3 -
i ��,aFk�k��x ��anaaa�naa=_S an
�f{I�pzFyyF�EQRo"a"oaa8y�g�@b�pp�9 esg�°gK.g�gc8�s�ea6ada»i"aaa :�5saS000aRR�avy�ea5gg�a"aigsa5a�a�q��®�ig�l�ig�R�
sI�FGF��.GGG000088IIII��CGOQ00G7.�O�B00^.G67.7'xJ�:OOaCC0007000'xJ a:iii:�i i�IteO�i��O�OQR c.
FRF6:CIIZIIZ:ixBiCCZRZCRRB-e8^eZ---E8------'-°--- --aZARn----R-SRRRBxY:::7:7:?:Rrp
APB,...
IA+ Tw Arl Y.dlw>t saQRm
Ile Awl Awl 1Jm_.a _ Las_w.s _ Is..�....e w rw cw r11J.W IA ;me...ww nr.. ewwm uR>Twa Qpw apw eww.w a..rsa Lw1
133 nll TIl CQJIROLIDK116M0KIHAHW PARK ARI:3/MY4ROfA0] Ylwml{ I,nOW N iM10D Idrn 0 19m 0 lAm
13.nll Ti
CQTROL Ilat YOHidG wCA.MFY PARK PARKS/MYO¢OUt61 bIYW:6 ).914W N iWm femism 0 1,9m o ltm
15311N TN COMROI IA0.110H]HR',PARK rAL] PAR1:]/MYOROLIL bIMD16 D,Imm ro ro ]4m Item MJ4e 0 D.Im D D,IW
I1f)113 TIS BNK'O�AORTA ITF1UWMdG R,'Af1J PA103/MYORIXRC] Y✓NIb n.mom Ff>Ses o 0 61,KK tl}W
3]tln )11)SINGIE UHIHEVOI lIIADE]YRtILTL£ PN0:3/MYORO'JKIS FIYJO:a D.{I]E: 1 l4Al 0
I1ImD'r RTTNAA l)nTIN311{1iI1Tw,)HNO S(DPIOPCFSKET�CTABLImA•'TRHtT?PHIVGKF IRCrA LS4AHFIASdO P 6I0.3TSDRiB.]L HIII'1t6 I1P: )YA 0:3/MM)YYtO®ROEIR\'OA]G ENCY vl10]/'r10:1]) 3U9.1l6S)mif 10 1 le 0
;Dlm Fbr
PRS/MTGROS i%-mm Fd Na,5I1nC5 0 INUS,,0Inn13
0 1;01{ 0 I1619
111 TA) nl)wAhxT¢IXi;TAR):CAK£lKATAK mIA.4 HOA)110.4 Ylmll 61,OOOm N RID f1 Fwlae 0 iu. 0 O
W TIIO 11A COHiPLA LIE4:L103T1NG.HY,HCOCY PAPK PAPKS/MYGROLTDS X1mm 10 Ilftlm FfR`e 0 0 JUm 0 xMlm
N1 All nll CTNnOLLMi.IIGii:41G 1.AKEIIITER PAIIX]/MYOR41A0f li'1m16 9,Omm 10 i>Yn h11as D 9,]m o 1}m
M m1 1N rAIATAKAHAac IMIIS/MYGROIRDS ITn01] 9.Otlm 10 UDtl J-, 0 0 9,m1 0 400
161 1111 n)l fA1wTAKAHABLFACIfRSC IAAK1/MYGRQ1103f Y3Z I,OOA 11 I'm IeWs 0 0 9,WJ P"
IN 1D{ III.PAIATIAYANAAdAQIIA31] AIY:3I MYLROfAG] Y)IM3] 10 illiin Ilslas 0 0 9,mJ 40
1A0
let nA) nn no MIT CANTIf\TA1f1ADF SfRIK'TL'RT AJ IAPKS/MYLROUIDS Y)1/l01] 4 m ) 111TA tedr. 0 0 a5» o on
IN n.1 nAl IN01OR)CAMPSV�3 'JE SiRIx'11TFN rAD:a/MxGROIAOf Y11�] asnm 1 xD1A TSYs 0 o a1H o aSn
IY T1.9 Tw lwOIOaTCAl1ILEV6R SHADE STA]K'}{AL ES )Am:1:MTGR0IR0a v)In0:] as»m I o n i IrILr o 0 4sl! un
1%IDI IDI 1101OiT CAYTRE\Till L1.1DE STRRiVIIErt PAIOI]rMYORVJNp3 v)1lm:1 as+sm 1 Min
III- 0 Ulf Un
17I RSi IHI TYOl0BTGYT4Ev0ISHAD65iR:KI{.TiE{] PNRSr MYORIXAmI vIIMJi 11ua Ase0s 0 0 i.JL t}A
In n31 1y1 TwOTOR CAYT0.EVULSNM63TPLCT.TIFr IARKS/MTOAOLRDI vlV1011 ) iD)10 ienJt:m 0 0 4111 tin
In I11. nN lAlAT1AKAMA IIFACImI.N PARR]rMTO¢0IAm1 YIl/m') IO}+1m 11 JAIL iEa:+s 0 0 It 0 IUn
IN 13f3 ID1 PA]ATA%AAAHIb.�s» PAPNS/MYGRIXIES Y]1MIJ 9.ONA 11 11n 17 )Euiv 9.00 0 fA0
Il)1n0 Rn PA[ATAILAHJ.BLEA0lHUN PARRS/MTOR0.110] 1l1/JT) 0.01m 11 LID Ii Mi�:m 0 9,00 0 1"
1A n17 m) %M. T- 0 ln0 0 um
In 1»I n31 PAUJUKNUmICRQARSA )AIWS/MYGROVEIDf Y11001I t- N ;Itl 30 F.m:rn 0 .,AO 0 UA
In Rip A59 rAlA)]AK.WAHIFA�IDISN ➢AW:SIMYORO YID] Yll/A:1 1nOm N 1,P0A FEv:e:a o 0 L]A 0 llA
ID»m A:AIIAIAHAHLBACSRiY I10 TAPKS/MTGROYDS �nDm 11 Lm Ic:A.m 0 0 L)m 0 alm
Ib RH n.2
SDIDSGHHAJa'9c'P ➢NKS/MYGROLMJS 1-7 a.nx 11 ;IDe. !Fairs 0 0 I..A 0 a.»
ISI IPf »75 13DID 9G1]wNI01FA0M PARK IARKS/MYGROL40n ),eAN 11 ;IMS) )rl6s 0 0 ldn 0 lAn
Itl RN nN ISDm Snf PAlAT3AAAHA PARK ➢ARKS/MY4R0IlldJS 1.inN IP 11A 11 NsWs 0 ;{D a ;On
113)T» 7m Iaom lmH IACKIegYPARK PAAf:1/MYGRO[AIDS Int/mJ) 1.{nN A 11D 1i sd.r 0 0 ;{u 0 )An
IN Illt 'MI IHSTWUGL w'AluIiOWH ➢AAKf/MYGROUNOS KYAII m,OAm 13 n.n1m Fw:w. 0 0 mp1 0 m.0.1
In/SU nN HA]FBALL 4AJTatAAP9AlAl1AlIAMA1AII ➢ARKS/MYGROLMS .nNAJI IO,InA 11 I,ftl fl in 0 10.111 0 141n
IM nA AA R/.].YS%'ll P/WCROiDYAi1LNS rARK]/MYGROU3D] Nlne?l >)1,imn 10 In.D111 fr•�+ 0 0 JT,A) 0 ST,im
117 riA Tm L'UlI{®ARII111IalA0b) IARK1/MYGR01HOn 1NAII 1Nm 11 ],f00n fitlw.a 0 0 0 1,W
IFS nll T3J AESiRC0{1HORATA A)A4' NTI RHRSAIKRICATEA Y)Am:) )l,A]tl IP ;1101] Friers D TA,R] o A)u
IN nri nn DUG GVIImTI IALARAWMIAIK )ARKI/MYORO1Aan .O0'ml] T.IIsm IS Ncn:n 0 I;NS 0 T,I.1
Im]339 n31 D[SC'Gp3 NCT1)YS UKE gAWATNA AtC16a\'E 1MO14 XWW D XM"1(NA Fm!e:m 0 XAfe
NI AN nu HAssr6ul.mUPt LAIfIHDLL Sa)01PAlIK IARKf/MYCAd.,'+Df anYmll 1),Mm D 1Mfm hose 0 D}13 0 );1»
In.19 A19 JI.m0m II ;IDW Teu,a 0 I1.m0 t II,Om
1n)DO )mo 1.4w p100UT AXY3@TARE Iatn IARY WLROI.Imallfc u11llDll CO". 11 I,IUSO iea'+cn 0 4W D Mm
1N A!J Ail NEw BA3FFTHAl1 cOWiT@I.u'cTKLTAI PAPK TwLgT'.1011InC s11nD11 11;110m II WasTc'.M1n 0 11;130 D Il,lm
In SIOl All AESN]ACItl Gff TE]P3 mlA'fT11ANCOCK 9AAC Pw4,mm RAC Y1M011 ILSWm 11 lOmm )w:tin 1;0m 0 I120m
IM M) ]5:1 FO'BIEAci;EYi®IIANCOC%➢A¢K PWLAOl1Mn NTc In)IJ011 Xwo 10 9.An 10 Fw:an X- 0 N,Sm
Itl ni e]e YIS,.QifR SIIALO SSAiICIIOL®IIMIID(]t IARI: TYLROUNDf I.ITC InAD11 Aw* 1 n,11)N Tw:.em 0 m.Yt 0 NAu
)fA kL1TA iB1L PAGKSTOPITi TTi+0@I1A`KOCA PR wYG4OY - Y+TFsII A}Wm S 11}nW 11mA!Feat 10.m0 0 0 141m
bD OUL0.i AOQ ARLALH01l: AYLR0IdO311fC 1/I>n0:1 14faCm 13 ;fAN lw:.cn 0 Ia1W 0 1I.-
Xo)dU ]fm RLNOYA:1@:OF W3PII'a PAPY RL9'IO[R. PYGOCM."DINTC u1m:1 ]a000m 10 0.0Wm 0 XDW 0 XDW
bl Tm 7)A Nc)ORY POdiEPAMK YIRORY IOO]iE PARK )nMD:t Idn,ASA D 111,A11+ 0 ;bn,191 0 I.OSsll
YY'TOAY NP116 PAPK VCfORT POOpiEPAR% 1n)/mIl ).taf,WO m fL-11M 0 0 ,wI 0 ).H1Ai1
]n nfl ]ITMnIAA:FEN6 Mn:1l MT4MIAm5 ILml1 3;n3m );91JR IrWs 0 R»1 i;13f
]0.nll �I IARIfH.TG IIGRidc Al•9PIR.ES PAnt/MY4RONm1 I/Im19 IXM1W m 1;Ilan blm. 0 I]S,MJ Il4m
]m tlH tll.HonPm RIWVATIDI33 A¢N]]MYORIJVlO)5 WAJI9 9.3»m f ;rnm Idea tEgw 9,1]S 0 9,1n
Pn tl» 015 5.Si P®IRENOYATKRI! ARK]/MYGRWNG\i rVRll9 9,S15m 1 11nm Md�AErvs 9}]1 0 I}ri
mi Snl ntl dIIRY'BY PGR NCSJ0PA0E H11H1A1G TSRELS(GTK1H C411bY YIm19 10 n.o fclA,s 0 0 IIm I,NO
]01 IA1 IItl TRAII C]➢MAO AT APC NTa PEIXFATK¢J CH)!flt !nwAJ9 ID,fNID JO :.n)w Fclrn IO.NI IeJ.I
]W 1113 tllf C01.1J1®ARNM AND OHICIi IAIW/MTOAOUNDS wl)n019 1.,9mm ro 1.bn 1J TrMeb
210 I. I.OS SAKE NAwAT11A RBIORE 1AlIE IIIAWATXAPR53E11S P50'A!9 411])I 1 l.M113 M.e AF.ImP .All 0 C Mll
Of
1111116 NA MTGROVN0.WATEHiRWJPABk IAPAS/MTORDUJ@4 YJO/Alf ..31lm Fle4un 0 >AADi AS9]
111 I.n {Q)MTGR0.TDNa(DAJEY PA¢K IARAfrMTGROU+IIH 900AIf A a)f ),SW 1. Aa1n�n 0 A.1.: D A,I.]
Tl IOI WI BIl31.KTn.+r PESRTACE.wATFASAOM wASuI IROM PAPK 9O]R0:9 1,9mW I,SA I! Fdry IASC 0 I.-
]I.n99 ISN MYORQS.9 MAKE)BITER PMA�MYO0.WMN ILIO?310 .I,PMW l,n9N Fulua .1,9P1 0 .IIN
115 MY pW YSSVRP-dG BASJ:£'HAJ1 fOL9i PwGROUEID3 NTC 1/3]/1m4 ;]10m N])5 PwWm
f MS] W>JOl'uS SD®GOIIMPA.IOM FGROOHD33(iC I;nIW I,Itl01 bdJM 0 :S.+fl 11.b1
)I]N0 Y61 BOAT AAW AIID IIETi1lOGf6 WARR IROM LARK I)f0'IWC ],nl.11lw 10 1110Am Pelee ;tlJ,IN 0 ].tll,1N
all WE]i AluiIIAOAHA)AOO+IS PAPKS/MTGROIdO. v0�019 IS.M. 10 ;1mm Fdfw IS,mC 0 IV.
]It If lq yA yE)ptyA pARS;H6 ASgf3114�-] PAPI:aIMTOPO'JMSS MAII km. 10 n3tl Fo3us 11A 0 AFIO
)10 n:i nl)SApALL HOATHODII Iw1nOT 11Amm A FdY 01 7,m0 0 f),om
n1 nu n11 POAr DOp', eGATHd.Js /)4MDW ro om Ides o IR9m o IkAm
ID nl9 m9 BOATUN:�11 BOATHDJ36 IwlntlO XNDm 10 Om iwWe 0 XND 0 XND
ID 93w 1JD1 S)aEKffCAI£AII BL`Nf3 PARKdO 101diY fLW, YLVMI )iNm ro Om 1--
1].Sn1 1DI)OW CHLVYA 1:116 CIIIJ(ai cliY@'SLR I1 .4W10 1 ]4Wm YFNeIs 0 m.Ml 0 0 IRNI
]ri 1-
STC nA]m]iFSP LGSvP'Y AJIv/ IAPK.91 MYO0.01RD3 IAYSIDI I;IA IO f I;lA l0 vr,a. 0 I),IA 0 I5.111
lA 13d fJw 1m>PORD EdI.ORER\.ASH! tARR3/M YOPOIHOS )RNm+ Aln ! iI.M I) Ywe. 0 lI.W o 0 al 1.1
III tlA tlf1 ALDENR.N B09dSIW:.'VCI:PwRK tAPK1JMYGKWMS )I,)O1m 10 I.R1m F.sbs 0 0 I.ns I,nf
1A sere mx nAi LWROpG XANGOIX PARK PARKS/MY4RON.OS invAWl ll,Nfm 10 tl.Mm ida o 0 II,NS o II Ws
�i
'�x����#�F�i�m$�$a""B5s""sia""s="a"a�yzx:�a:x$�gs��fi��65"s$�5YcL5a"e�l�5"cat"a"a"_ea59"se�i5555$
tttsi! 9
���a������?��syxyaXixax:axy�yyayz�Ey�zgx�x�ea=a��nz�.y�ykyy��s�Yaac�a��p��yy�yaa73������&�65I[
8 2C� EYYyXdIX+y�i�YyyM�2 8'JlYT Y,Y".Yyytl Y�Y�E�X�3'.L XflE-.�.a0G93A� ,M fit B�I�I
�� � �������'�� $$$ $ : 5fi55 9 H �� nHH ngs s g+ n� p•�
e 6gi g; "'IMAM
�
5fiF5555 .�� rrr rb O $
pgQQppgqggppPPPFPPppgP ��it•~tttt��iaQ pp t�••;���•������;�tttti�t�• �
pa-aw
A 7JAAAAAAAiAAAAA 7�9< '� �� �� ��pA AA g""AB����"• � �� � ������ �^' §
HH22MMUR ,%NO OWNk�leidd d F � A 9z98 V Si AAI
Y YYYYYY35e�SYY 5cYe5 5 ge5eae5S Y e Ye YcSY� 7
------ - ----------- -.. :.--. - �
Qp.
9$$g$$93`na�a"a�BF��Y's_ss_x��l���E!&5asi�sagg$Bit�s�3�8®Ads$u@y��if�ix��"a�!®�y��eee�'$e9
88888H8RRiRRReeRtYRa9]98xHSHHBaHLLaLa88a74tl867:98en9�X8 x�-.B C�nS8^enaH88X88888Q
itt
b
i
............. ..RG...a:..,...,......:
y•�_LLL� �' _ u �i �
£FFF£EFsx"x2-xc9y'x:�SxxxY:$�g5Y�38g5 $ii"s6ffSsGBla''aEe�En�=?8 a- Y�89 �l..��sy
Y Y RFF Y�Y�Fy Lyy Fy FFy y�FEn FX E$'-9W99.'O..8 ES�'d Y.x8��7s'.��FF��66 Is F Fvi.%=s,E-,a&ta Itn29a:S=8na9 3=LxS 18cc Y FX88885
ES� 4 4 4444�46 4 4 4 45: 1 .... ..
ff fff#figffff f � f fffff f ............. €I'll U P-1111 iff�fgf i
999 999YYYY"Y iZ 9'6�eOeeeeb'x2 gg s i g14e "ea UZFee�e�
................... ........., oe..,ea�....�bt...T�.u..o�00000000�
................. .........................L.1......I...............
...ease.eeeeeeeee.00eeee.e...eeeeeee0000eeeeeee......................eeneeeel
Q?5?§ § Y zfrrass �8ab�4;3 Vu 5 a is s'
Y_.
a§d aaaa�aaaaa��a� � FAst>F5ffi � � �a �K.'.
ZOZRZZZZ2
bbSS.S Z.S= YYYYYYY7C 7CYYYYY
699
i
�6��6i�6����Ri�iii >�gP����t6L t�b� �3n�L� n�o� ;9 ;3�CG" n00000000
����uu�a. du���appa appaappaa22pppppgppgamg9y jai pQ�9a x J� pp
�A,•�«�����999yddS9H
09 ���g�g�q�y�p��OB���g��giiii a 9$ °y�y9yT i8 3 � K o ooi i ion�
AAA 4Ye7• 9` i995A9 i� 91'3 995 9 � � 9MIN59A595999 §
ggt
- --- --�--- -- - - ---- =a-r �rL-rn------------ ° iiE
33�3$3i�5s06oasaan�'�$8��ei�ii`e35333�33i �� 5�siiyyyz���f� �65"•e4'��6FE�6�8�$9§�$33B
ssnsssassssssssssseaeaas=s===e=»_____�s�e_sxsttgsseYxaYa�sessesea=aLLaasesebLC
� e
..,.,.,..,.,...,..,.....,..,..... . .......
s �
b'sttmst ris3x3=t EE£?f£Fff�
''s's`s's`sga`s`e'ss`s`s's`e`s`a`s`s`se'a's's's'xe`sea`s`se`sa`s`s`se`s`s's's's's'asa's`asnsn�e=»<�n•_�ux"saes=-mxe::e
EEEEEEEEEE4EE�'�i4E4�44EEEE4EE4EEEEEE�'EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE-EE:46€EEEEEEEEEEEE�
w wwwwwwwwwwwww wwwRwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww�ww�'wwwwwwwwwwwwwww
fffff#ff###ff#fff#ffffffffff#ff########fff###fff####fff�'�'^ff°#ffffffffffffff
y3 ig aiisstk�r'SEEEsYs um 3 ys-E4vzfHE! M$$6$=
............................................................................�
...................... ----ti..e...............�,-4
............................................................................
I
_ E
X: -8RFYR Ri RR SvC Efi- R R A F RR R a R
......-....-o----------------------------k-N__...R!............. ¢R........
a
$�avoee -----------
..........................
................ ................e.....................
^fin 4
.
�e88eeeeeeefiYR8586dA8RAAE..... 88888888R:88BdR8RR80R$$9999A8888R8YYAntRtA588
g .....
'�^••^^••••••••88R3333^^^aB3333RRa�gg�gg&E3s3__R^8^5939^^^333339'3oeeeg-.-333RR_38
'x' its^.78=8Y88:888R8C28888C80a888888888866R5^.SRY8888ae8aca.ix8888888F667=788888
"a-"--
�s� "
Ee
WI WI a H^ @8SS8RSN
SSSS�A
WWI
Im
.m
q- pot € 8�
44H
All
R&asRsa9RR�R#k#Pe3�L$sG63"r?$$63.=.8:z.2?SE:6c68c83"rE83�353??5?°tS4i?33S3F$5633:
Mi•�
CYr M CM..1
Ls Tr .d�o.l! F.a'.a.l dk
it rlum,w�ccvwrsae mru. ss,s,l.cv- sn,n, sst.xs.w