Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.9.2026 - City Council Minutes City of Cler�ssont MIN CITES REGULAR COU-NCIL MEETING June 9,2026 CALL TO ORDER The City Council met in a regular meeting on Tuesday, June 9, 2026, at 3:00 pm in the Clermont City Council Chambers_ Mayor Murry called the meeting to order at 3:00 pm with the Following Council Members present: Council Members Strange,Bain,Petersen and Myers. Other City officials present were City Attorney Waugh, Deputy City Manager Matthys and Deputy City Clerk Wisniewski_ INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Jocelyn Williamson from the Central Florida Freethought Community gave the invocation,followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. PRESENTATIONS City Clerk Howe presented Deputy City Clerk Wisniewski with her Certified Municipal Clerk certitication and pin_ Finance Director 13 a r presented the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 quarterly budget report and noted that the report is available on the city's website with additional details available through the report's drill-down features_He provided an overview of the city's frnancial position at the midpoint of the fiscal year,reporting approximately$76.9 million in revenues and$55.3 million in expenditures across all funds_ Revenues are tracking at 54 percent oI budget and expenditures at 34 percent,with the lower expenditure rate primarily due to capital projects that have been approved but have not yet had significant spending. Finance Director 13—shared that the General Fund remains in a strong position,with approximately$41 million in revenues received and $26.2 million in expenditures to date_ Ad valorem tax collections are coming in as expected, while sales tax revenues remain consistent but continue to show limited growth compared to previous years. He also noted that upcoming budget amendments will address FEMA reimbursement revenues and the final accounting adjustments related to the wastewater treatment plant project_ Based on current projections and audited £figures, the city is expected to end the fiscal year with approximately$24.1 million in unreserved General Fund balance above the required fund balance policy_ Overall,revenues and expenditures are tracking as expected and remain in line with the adopted budget_ Council discussed tax collections,debt service,and sales tax revenues_ Finance Director Borror noted that tax collections are historically between 94 percent and 98 percent and are expected to remain on track_ He explained that debt service timing affects current percentages, but the city is within budget and noted a planned debt issuance has not occurred. Council also requested further review of the State's sales tax allocation methodology due to revenues remaining flat despite community growth_ PUBLIC COMMENT Paula Hoisington, 564 E_ Desoto Street — thanked Public Services For addressing the no parking sign concern at Bloxam Avenue and Scott Street and recognized the Police Department for their continued community meetings, responsiveness, and efforts to engage with residents and address neighborhood concerns. Banks Helfrich, Sams Lake Road spoke about the importance of serving others, encouraging the community to Focus on compassion,kindness,and making a positive impact. 1 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 9,2026 Kurt Shuh,Clermont resident—recognized Flag Day and the Army's birthday,expressing appreciation for military service and honoring the sacrifices and contributions of those who have served our country. AGENDA CHANGES City Manager Van Wagner informed the Council of the following agenda change: Item No. 10-Special Event Road Closure Request,Orange Crush (701 Anniversary) City Manager Van Wagner stated this item was being withdrawn from the agenda. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Murry advised the next item on the agenda for consideration was the Consent Agenda and requested anyone wishing to have any item pulled for discussion to please come forward at this time. Item No. 1 —Meeting Minutes Consider approval of the May 19, 2026, Council Workshop minutes. Item No. 2—Surplus Request Consider declaring end-of-life inventory as surplus from the departments of Public Services, Information Technology, Police, Parks and Recreation, and provide disposal per the Procurement Policy. Item No.3—Resolution No.2026-017R Consider adoption to establish a Comprehensive Comprehensive Budget Policy Budget Policy. Item No.4—Task Order Approval Consider Task Authorization with Powell Studio City Hall Park Stage Architecture LLC for professional architectural and engineering design services for the proposed project in the budgeted amount of$104,500. Item No.5—Sole Source Purchase Consider approval from Channel Innovations for Fire Equipment the acquisition of a Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus compressor and cascade refill system in the total budgeted amount of$73,097.56. Item No.6—Request For Qualification Award Consider Awarding Term Contracts to the top ten GIS Surveying and Mapping Services firms for on-call consulting services. Item No.7—Request For Qualification Award Consider Awarding Term Contracts to the top six Electrical Engineer firms for On-call Professional Engineering Services. Item No. 8—Request For Qualification Award Consider awarding Term Contracts to the top five Construction Administration and Inspection firms for on-call consulting services. 2 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 9,2026 Item No.9—Request For Proposal Award Consider contract approval with Legacy Sports Lake Felter Park Surfacing LLC for Natural Grass to Artificial Turf Athletic Field Conversion including Add Alternate #4 Organic Infill in the total budgeted amount of$608,500. Item No. 10—Special Event Road Closure Consider request approval for Sunday,June 14, Request 2026,at the Florida Citrus Tower for a fireworks Orange Crush (701h Anniversary) display scheduled for 9:00 PM. Item No. 11—Special Event Road Closure Consider request approval for Friday,June 19, Request 2026,from 6:30PM to 9PM,portion of 7th Street Seven Made— Worship Night to W.Montrose St. Council Member Petersen pulled Consent Agenda Items No.4 and No. 9. Council Member Strange pulled Consent Agenda Items No. 7 and No. 8. Council Member Bain motioned to approve Consent Agenda items 1-3, 5-6 and 11. Seconded by Council Member Myers. The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing aye. Item No.4—Task Order Approval,City Hall Park Stage Council Member Petersen explained that he was pulling the item due to timing concerns, noting that the City should review upcoming projects as a whole in light of potential property tax changes and the need to prioritize available funding. He suggested holding a workshop to discuss project priorities and future expenditures. Mayor Murry opened public comment.There were no comments.Mayor Murry closed public comment. Council Members discussed the uncertainty surrounding the upcoming property tax vote and the need to consider overall fiscal impacts before advancing new projects. It was stated that the current action relates only to design and engineering,not full project approval,and that the project has been in planning for several years. Council also spoke about the importance of balancing community needs with potential future budget constraints and ensuring careful prioritization of upcoming expenditures. Council Member Strange suggested tabling the item to the June 23 Council Meeting, to give Council the opportunity to hear the National Recreation and Park Association presentation at the upcoming workshop before deciding. Council Member Stranize motioned to table the item to June 23,2026.Seconded by Council Member Petersen. Mayor Murry requested that City Manager Van Wagner work with Finance ahead of the upcoming workshop to provide information on annual costs associated with renting and installing stages,to evaluate potential cost savings and better inform future discussions. 3 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 9,2026 The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing aye. Item No.7—Request For Qualification Award,Electrical Engineer Council Member Strange stated she pulled the item to seek clarification on the number of professionals being approved, noting a past pattern of approving up to 10 in similar categories. In this case, only nine firms qualified, and the members questioned limiting the number rather than allowing up to 10 or the maximum qualified pool, describing the cap as potentially arbitrary and expressing support for approving up to the full qualified number. Mayor Murry opened public comment.There were no comments.Mayor Murry closed public comments. Council members discussed the procurement evaluation process, including how selection committees are formed and how firms are scored and ranked. Procurement Director Suarez explained that committee composition varies depending on the project and may include internal staff with relevant experience,with the option to include outside subject matter experts when appropriate under current policy. The discussion also addressed whether additional specialized expertise should be required on evaluation committees to better assess technical qualifications.City Attorney Waugh clarified that existing policy provides discretion in how committees are structured and that any requirement for specific expertise would need to be formally adopted through policy change.It was noted that six firms were recommended based on the scoring results, with clear separation in point totals between ranked applicants, and that the current process is intended to ensure fairness while maintaining flexibility in selection. Council Member Bain motioned to approve Consent Agenda Item No. 7 as presented. Seconded by Council Member Myers. The motion passed 3-2 with Council Member Strange and Council Member Petersen opposed. Item No.8—Request For Qualification Award, Construction Administration and Inspection Council Member Strange expressed concern with the selection process, stating that selecting five firms instead of six appeared arbitrary. She noted that the scores for applicants ranked six through nine were within two points of the fifth-ranked firm and questioned how the final determination was made.She shared concerns regarding recent procurement outcomes and stated she was not comfortable supporting the recommendation at this time. Mayor Murry opened public comment. There were no comments.Mayor Murry closed public comments. Council Member Bain motioned to approve Consent Agenda Item No. 8. Seconded by Council Member Myers.The motion passed 3-2 with Council Member Strange and Council Member Petersen opposed. Item No.9—Request For Proposal Award,Lake Felter Park Council Member Petersen recommended tabling the item to allow for a broader discussion regarding all upcoming capital projects. He emphasized the importance of planning ahead and reviewing project timelines,noting that the next fiscal year is only five months away and that proactive discussion would help ensure priorities and decisions are aligned. Mayor Murry opened public comment. There were no comments. Mayor Murry closed public comments. 4 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 9,2026 Council Member Petersen motioned to table Consent Agenda Item No. 9 and bring it to a workshop to discuss further. Seconded by Council Member Myers. Council discussed the appropriate date to table the item and agreed to move it to the June 23 Council Meeting for further discussion following the upcoming workshop. It was noted that the item could be reconsidered or amended after additional discussion and review. Council Member Petersen amended his motion to table Consent Agenda Item No.9 to June 23 2026. Seconded by Council Member Myers. Council discussed the distinction between moving forward with an already budgeted project versus taking on new expenditures. It was noted that the project is intended to provide long-term cost savings, reduce recurring maintenance expenses, and address facility availability concerns. Council acknowledged the uncertainty surrounding future budget impacts but agreed that a short delay for additional discussion and review would not significantly affect the project timeline. The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing aye. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Item No. 12—Purchase Approval and Budget Amendment,AXON Enterprise Police Chief Graczyk addressed Council regarding concerns raised at the previous meeting regarding this item and introduced Mr. Teddy Duffy from Axon to provide an overview of the proposed translation software. Mr.Duffy explained that the AXON assistant tool provides real-time language translation to assist officers during critical situations, such as emergencies involving individuals who speak different languages. He clarified that the software does not transcribe conversations or generate reports but instead allows officers to communicate more effectively without relying on personal devices in the field,allowing them to remain focused on their surroundings. Council Member Strange requested clarification on whether the translation software would integrate with reporting or other systems. Mr. Duffy explained that it does not feed into any reporting or documentation systems and that all translation activity is captured only through body camera evidence storage without creating additional records. The City Attorney confirmed the software does not alter or modify any underlying data,and Mr. Duffy clarified that report generation concerns relate to a separate product, Draft One,not the translation tool. Council Member Petersen also asked about potential future facial recognition capabilities, and Mr. Duffy stated that while he could not speak about future development, the current software is strictly limited to real-time translation and does not include facial recognition or evidence modification. Mayor Murry opened public comment. There were no comments.Mayor Murry closed public comments. Council discussed whether the system is fully self-contained and independent of external data links, with staff confirming the body camera operates via LTE and stores data securely in Clermont Police Department. It was clarified that any expansion to additional Axon products,such as Draft One or other services,would not be included under the current purchase and would require a separate contract amendment for any future use. 5 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 9,2026 Police Chief Graczyk presented the financial overview,explaining that the approximately$151,000 cost is fully covered through federal grant funds under the designated immigration officer program, resulting in no impact to the City's General Fund.He noted that the funding is tracked and audited through established grant coding processes and confirmed the contract covers a five-year period with upgrades included,while any future products such as Draft One would require separate Council approval. Council discussed the recent implementation of Axon equipment, confirmation that the current body cameras are only about six months old, and the rapid pace of technology upgrades. The Chief emphasized ongoing efforts to balance operational effectiveness with community concerns and confirmed regular reporting to the City Manager and Deputy City Manager on technology performance and use.Council expressed appreciation for the grant funding approach,the lack of cost to residents,and the anticipated safety benefits of improved translation capabilities during police interactions. Council Member Strange motioned to approve item 12 with the condition that if the service they are approving is ever uperaded or changed in such a way that the service exceeds translation services that it comes back to Council for approval. Council discussed approval of the five-year agreement with the understanding that the current authorization is limited to translation services only. It was noted that any future expansion or changes in functionality beyond translation would return to Council for consideration prior to implementation. Seconded by Council Member Petersen. The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing aye. Item No. 13—Surplus City Property Development Services Director Henschel presented the item. Staff proposed surplussing city property that does not serve a purpose for public use.The 1,335 square foot parcel is left over property between the new lift station at the "Lumberyard" and private property to the west. Initially, staff thought this parcel was included with a larger surplus property to the south donated by the Lumberyard,but when surveyed,it was discovered this was a left-over parcel owned by the city,that did not serve a purpose and would only create a maintenance issue for the parcel. Once the new lift station is constructed, the parcel would sit between two fences approximately 100 feet apart. This request was brought to Council for consideration at their regularly scheduled meeting on May 12, 2026. Council directed staff to get with DPZ Design Co (DPZ) to determine if surplussing this piece of property would unnecessarily disconnect the trail or limit its future use and then bring the request back to Council for further consideration. Upon discussions with our Economic Development Director and reviewing the site area, DPZ has concluded that the proposed ownership transfer does neither disconnects the trail nor limits its future use, and arguably it generates revenue for the city while eliminating maintenance. Based on staff and DPZ's reviews, our recommendation is that the 1,335 square foot parcel does not serve a purpose for public use.Therefore, staff recommends the city surplus this property.The city will retain an easement over this parcel for any utilities that remain underground. Mayor Murry opened public comment. There were no comments. Mayor Murry closed public comments. 6 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 9,2026 Council Member Bain expressed appreciation to staff for providing additional information,stated continued support from the prior meeting,and encouraged approval to move the item forward. Council Member Bain motioned to approve Item No. 13. Seconded by Council Member Myers. The City Attorney clarified that,if Council chooses to approve the item,the motion should include the staff recommendation to specify that the city retains an underground utility easement. Council Member Bain amended his motion to approve with the city retaining an easement over the parcel for any utilities that remain underground. Seconded by Council Member Myers. Discussion centered on the rationale for declaring a portion of property surplus considering an existing utility easement and the need to maintain access for city infrastructure. Concerns were raised about the decision to consider only a segment of the larger corridor rather than the full area. The intended use and limited functionality of the specific 100-foot section between existing fenced uses was addressed, along with confirmation that city ownership and access would be maintained where needed.Additional consultant input was also referenced, and the item ultimately had support to move forward. The motion passed 4-1 with Mayor Mum opposed. Item No. 14—Ordinance No.2026-023,Final Hearing AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 1, ARTICLE 11, DIVISION 3 OF THE CLERMONT CITY CODE TO CREATE SECTION 1-101, PROVIDING FOR ADMINISTRATIVE FINES,COSTS OF REPAIR,COSTS OF ENFORCEMENT,AND LIENS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT, SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION THE ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENERS ERROR,PUBLICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Deputy City Clerk Wisniewski read the title aloud. City Attorney Waugh presented a proposed new section of the City Code related to code enforcement.The update would allow the City to recover enforcement costs, including investigation expenses, when violations are found, even if the property is later brought into compliance. It also reflects the city's population exceeding 50,000,which allows for increased fine amounts. Because current code does not clearly list fine amounts for code violations,a new section is required rather than amending existing provisions. The proposal also strengthens authority for the Code Enforcement Board in cases involving serious threats to public health,safety,or welfare,or violations that are irreparable or irreversible, allowing the city to take corrective actions such as securing, repairing, or demolishing property when necessary. Mayor Murry opened the public hearing.There were no comments.Mayor Murry closed the public hearing. Council discussion focused on clarification of the proposed new code enforcement section and its relationship to existing procedures under Florida Statutes Chapter 162. Questions were raised about the 7 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 9,2026 way fines are currently defined, the manner in which repeat violations are treated, and whether the new language changes the way first-time versus repeat offenders are handled. City Attorney Waugh explained that current city code does not explicitly list fine amounts and instead relies on statutory references,while typical practice has been$250 per day for first violations and higher amounts for repeat violations. The proposed update formalizes fine authority, increases allowable maximums for repeat offenders,and clarifies enforcement tools already used in practice. Concerns were also expressed about the lack of a side-by-side comparison between existing code and the proposed changes. City Attorney Waugh noted that the update functions as a comprehensive new section due to gaps and limitations in the existing code structure,while leaving other procedural provisions intact. It was further clarified that repeat violator provisions remain in place,with enhanced penalty authority for ongoing noncompliance,and that any conflicting prior ordinance language would be superseded by the new section. Council Member Myers motioned to approve Item No. 14 Ordinance No. 2026-023. Seconded by Council Member Petersen. The motion passed by roll call 5-0 with all members present voicing_ave. NEW BUSINESS Item No. 15—Variance Request,2099 Aibonito Cir. Development Services Planner Day presented the item. The applicant,Gerald Saintilma, is requesting three variances for his property at 2099 Aibonito Circle due to a pending code enforcement case involving installed pavers.The property is in the Bella Terra Subdivision and zoned R 1 Single Family Medium Density Residential District. The first variance request is to reduce the required 7.5-foot side yard setback to allow the existing astroturf to remain at zero feet from the property lines on both sides of the property. The proposed reduction would also allow the existing paver patio to encroach into the west side yard setback and remain at 3 feet from the property line. The second variance request is to reduce the required 25-foot rear yard setback to allow the existing astroturf to remain at 5 feet from the north property line. During review of the variance application, the applicant worked with a civil engineer to address stormwater concerns and reduce the impervious surface area on the property to come into compliance with the code.As a result,the third variance request that was originally anticipated is no longer needed. The applicant stated that the backyard has a noticeable slope, which created drainage and erosion concerns during the construction of the pool. Improvements such as redirection of the gutters to a stormwater drain and the installation of astroturf were implemented to prevent erosion and minimize stormwater run-off. The applicant mentioned a practical hardship due to the property's unique conditions. 8 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 9,2026 Upon review,staff cannot support the requested reduction to the setbacks.The variance request is more than the minimum in order to make reasonable use of the land as the paver patio could meet setback requirements if reconfigured. The City's Engineer reviewed the improvements made to the astroturf and noted that it would require strict,ongoing maintenance to ensure the sub-base functions correctly. Without proper maintenance, stormwater runoff could increase and negatively affect neighboring properties and the overall drainage system. Under Land Development Code Section 101-246, a variance may only be granted with a positive finding on all review criteria. Staff find the application fails to meet two of the five required criteria. Therefore, staff recommend denial of the variance request. The applicant, France Saintilma, apologized for the permitting oversight and explained that the improvements included artificial turf and a small paver area installed after pool construction.She stated the project was driven by the health and safety needs of their young children, including a child with medically confirmed severe environmental allergies, and the need to create an allergen-free outdoor environment. Additional site conditions were cited, including slope, erosion concerns, and drainage issues, which contributed to the decision to modify the backyard. She also noted that stormwater was redirected to an existing system to address runoff concerns and emphasized efforts to comply through contractor interviews and Homeowners Association approval. They stated they were unaware that a city permit was required for artificial turf and expressed regret for the oversight while requesting approval of the variance. The applicant's engineer,Julian Quintana of Highland Engineering, was also present and available to respond to any questions regarding drainage concerns from Council. Mayor Murry opened public comment. Indira Arvizu,2093 Aibonito Circle—spoke in support of the variance request. Claude Tido, 1609 Presidio Drive—spoke in support of the variance request. Lovely Pierre,3024 Robles Road—spoke in support of the variance request. Maria Gutierrez, 2093 Aibonito Circle—spoke in support of the variance request. Kurt Shuh, Clermont resident — emphasized that under the Americans with Disabilities Act, reasonable accommodation requests are provided for under federal law and urged Council, legal counsel,and staff to keep this requirement in mind. Mayor Murry closed public comments. Discussion focused on the useful life and maintenance requirements of the proposed astroturf.The engineer estimated the turf could have an approximate 20-year lifespan, with specific details dependent on the manufacturer and clarified that maintenance concerns were related to potential future access to the utility easement,which could require removal and replacement of the turf and underlying materials.City Attorney Waugh recommended a hold harmless and indemnification agreement with the property owner to address any future impacts. 9 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 9,2026 Council discussed whether the requested variances could have been addressed through an administrative variance process in the future, with Deputy City Manager Matthys explaining that it would depend on the way the ordinance is structured and the amount of relief allowed for dimensional standards. It was noted that the property met impervious surface requirements and the variances were primarily related to setbacks. Council discussed the astroturf request, recognizing the applicant's efforts to work with the Homeowners Association, staff, and engineers, as well as the support from neighboring property owners. Council noted concerns regarding the long-term impacts of astroturf, including lifespan, maintenance, drainage, and the property's prior grading challenges, while also acknowledging the applicant's circumstances related to their child's allergies. Discussion included potentially placing a time limit on the approval based on the expected lifespan of the astroturf rather than allowing it to run with the property indefinitely. Council Member Petersen motioned to approve the variance. Seconded by Council Member Myers. Council Member Petersen amended his motion to approve the variance on the condition that the hold harmless agreement that we use in these situations be executed. Seconded by Council Member Myers. Council discussion included clarification that the Homeowners Association approval language places responsibility on the property owner for any flooding impacts caused by the turf affecting neighboring properties. Council Member Strange raised concerns regarding the astroturf as it is not an approved material and was being considered as an exception. Discussion followed regarding adding a 15-year limitation on the astroturf approval to allow the request to be revisited when the material reaches the end of its expected lifespan. Council discussed enforceability of the time limit, including the way it would apply if the property changed ownership, with City Attorney Waugh noting future owners would need to review applicable requirements at that time. Council Member Petersen amended his motion to include a 15-year sunset on the astroturf approval Seconded by Council Member Myers. The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing`ye. Item No. 16—Resolution No.2026-011R,Mayamero Conditional Use Permit A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY,FLORIDA,GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR A MOBILE FOOD DISPENSING VEHICLE TO OPERATE ON AN IMPROVED PARCEL LOCATED IN THE C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT,SEVERABILITY,ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENERS ERROR,PUBLICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Deputy City Clerk Wisniewski read the title aloud. Development Services Planner Kruse presented the item. The applicant, Rommel Rodulfo, is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a mobile food dispensing vehicle (food truck) on an improved parcel designated within the C 2 General Commercial Zoning District.The proposed location is 477 East Highway 50,within the Sunoco/Texaco parking lot. 10 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 9,2026 The applicant proposes operating a single food truck,Mayamero,with take-out service only.The food truck is proposed to be located on the east side of the property adjacent to the convenience store.The final location will be confirmed during site review to ensure compliance with all applicable building and fire safety codes. Currently,there is an existing food truck operation approximately 800 feet to the west located at 300 East Highway 50.Mayamero will operate in a similar fashion. The applicant has provided written authorization from the property owner allowing the use of the property, including access to restroom facilities for patrons. The proposed hours of operation are seven days a week, 4:00 p.m.to 10:00 p.m.The applicant will comply with all city regulations,Lake County Health Department and State licensing requirements and standards. Additionally,the applicant has indicated that the food truck will stay on the property overnight and would have commissary to drop off waste. The city's Land Development Code does not identify food trucks as permitted use within the C-2 General Commercial district. As such, the use requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit for this type of operation. The C 2 General Commercial district permits restaurants and food establishments when conducted within an enclosed structure. Staff find that the proposed use is compatible with the district and would not be more objectionable than other permitted uses. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval, 4-1, on the condition that the hours of operation are in accordance with the existing business. If City Council approved the resolution, an amendment would be needed to reflect the correct hours of operation. Staff verified the hours as Monday through Saturday until 9:00 PM and Sunday until 8:00 PM based on confirmation from a city employee. Staff have reviewed the application as submitted in accordance with the development standards criteria and find the proposed use can meet the general criteria for granting a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health,safety and welfare of the surrounding community.Staff recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the conditions contained in Resolution 2026-011 R. The applicant's son, Sebastian, requested approval to work with the proper permit and explained that he and his brother would assist his father by providing translation and answering questions to the best of their abilities. Mayor Murry opened public comments.There were no comments.Mayor Murry closed public comments. Discussion ensued regarding upcoming efforts to develop clearer food truck regulations, with agreement that the request should proceed under current code while future amendments are developed. Council focused on conditions of approval,particularly hours of operation,agreeing the food truck should align with existing business hours but not extend beyond 8:00 a.m.to 10:00 p.m.Council Member Strange suggested adding a sunset provision due to the anticipated adoption of a citywide food truck ordinance, while others supported approval without a sunset to remain consistent with prior approvals. Council emphasized conditions, including limiting the site to one food truck, requiring it to remain on the paved area, and ensuring compliance with operational standards such as restroom access and maintaining a clean operation. 11 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 9,2026 Staff confirmed that any additional food trucks would require returning to Council for approval. Council Member Bain motioned to approve Resolution No.2026-011R with the following changes: Section 2 Number 3 the hours of operation to be consistent with the current business hours of operation but not to exceed beyond 8 AM to 10 PM. to include the conditions in the staff, report into the Conditional Use Permit. Seconded by Council Member Myers The motion passed 4-1 with Council Member Strange opposed. Item No. 17—Ordinance No. 2026-014,Amend LDC Intro AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 125, TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF MOBILE FOOD DISPENSING VEHICLES PURSUANT TO SECTION 509.102, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT, SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION, ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER'S ERRORS,PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE. Deputy City Clerk Wisniewski read the title aloud. City Attorney informed Council that the Planning and Zoning Board had identified several conditions for Council's consideration that were not fully incorporated into the ordinance text.He explained that the board had also recommended a joint workshop to further review these items. City Attorney Waugh advised against proceeding with the first reading approval and later making substantive changes at the second reading, noting that the changes could be considered material and may require readvertising the ordinance.He recommended considering tabling the item until after the workshop to ensure all proposed modifications are properly reviewed and incorporated. Council Member Strange motioned to table Item No. 17, Ordinance No. 2026-014. Seconded by Council Member Myers. Council discussed having the joint workshop on August 18 and tabling the item until the first Council meeting in September following the workshop. Council Member Strange amended her motion to table Item No. 17, Ordinance No. 2026- 014 to September 8 2026 Seconded by Council Member Myers. The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing aye. Item No. 18—Ordinance No. 2026-021, Transmittal Intro AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE LARGE-SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING ACT, CHAPTER 163, PART II, FLORIDA STATUTES; SETTING FORTH THE AUTHORITY FOR ADOPTION OF THE LARGE-SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT; SETTING FORTH THE PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THE LARGE-SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 12 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 9,2026 AMENDMENT; PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE LARGE-SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT; ESTABLISHING THE LEGAL STATUS OF THE LARGE-SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT, SEVERABILITY, ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENERS ERROR,PUBLICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Deputy City Clerk Wisniewski read the title aloud. Development Services Planner Day presented the item. The City, as the applicant, is requesting a Large- Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning of the subject property following a staff-initiated annexation.The approximately 88.5+/-acre property includes the Hammock Pointe and Hammock Reserve subdivisions,which are fully built out and contain 196 existing single-family homes.The parcel has already been platted,developed,and is receiving City wastewater services. On October 28,2025,the City Council approved the annexation with the understanding that the appropriate future land use and zoning designations would be established at a later date in time.Staff are now proposing to complete the process. The property is currently designated with the Urban Low Density Future Land Use Category under Lake County. When reviewing the subdivisions under the City's requirements staff found the Low-Density Residential Future Land Use Category to be the most compatible. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval, 6-0 for Ordinance 2026-021. Staff recommends transmittal of the Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Ordinance No. 2026-021 and introduction of Rezoning Ordinance No. 2026-022. If approved, the state will then have 60 days for review to provide comments back to the city regarding the proposed map amendment. Once complete,the findings will be presented to the City Council during a regularly scheduled hearing in August for final determination. Council Member Bain motioned to introduce/transmit Ordinance No.2026-021. Seconded by Council Member Myers The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing ave. Item No. 19—Ordinance No.2026-022,Rezoning Intro AN ORDINANCE UNDER THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT REFERRED TO IN CHAPTER 122 OF ORDINANCE NO. 289-C, CODE OF ORDINANCES; REZONING THE REAL PROPERTIES DESCRIBED HEREIN AS SHOWN BELOW; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT,SEVERABILITY,ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENERS ERROR, RECORDING,PUBLICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Deputy City Clerk Wisniewski read the title aloud. Council Member Petersen motioned to introduce Ordinance No. 2026-022. Seconded by Council Member Myers The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing ave. 13 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 9,2026 Mayor Murry recessed the meeting at 5:20pm. Mayor Murry reconvened the meeting at 5:30pm. Item No.20—Fire Department EMS Transport Fire Chief Ezell presented an update on the potential pursuit of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (COPCN) from Lake County for City-operated Emergency Medical Service (EMS) transport services, with formal consideration scheduled to return to Council on June 23. The presentation reviewed increasing call volumes, noting EMS represents approximately 70 percent of Fire Department operations, with projected annual service calls exceeding 9,000 and current ambulance response times improving but remaining above the 10-minute goal. He reviewed current EMS funding through the County Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU), noting approximately $2.9 million annually contributed by city residents, while deployment decisions remain controlled by Lake County. Assistant Fire Chief Casler presented financial assumptions for a potential EMS transport program based on two frontline ambulances and two reserve units, estimating approximately $1.2 million in annual transport revenue, startup costs of approximately $5.3 million, and recurring costs of approximately $3.2 million, with potential reductions through revenue and MSTU funding. The presentation included future facility needs, noting existing stations have limited capacity for additional ambulance crews, but future facilities are being planned to support EMS operations.They also discussed continuing to utilize Lake County dispatch services,estimated at approximately $600,000 plus $15,000 annually for radios and maintenance. Fire Chief Ezell reviewed prior discussions with Lake County regarding a shared EMS model, explaining concerns with ambulances being deployed countywide rather than remaining primarily available within Clermont. He concluded that a phased municipal EMS transport system appears operationally feasible and would provide increased local control,with a COPCN required to move forward. Mayor Murry opened public comments.There were no comments.Mayor Murry closed public comments. Council discussed EMS financial and operational assumptions,including MSTU funding,transport revenue estimates, and a potential two-ambulance model, with staff clarifying cost figures and noting efficiencies were not fully included. Operational discussion covered response times, with fire/EMS providing rapid initial care within 6-7 minutes and ambulances handling transport over 1.5-2-hour call cycles, supporting multiple daily responses per unit. Concerns were raised about whether the model can meet approximately 6,000 annual calls given congestion, station placement changes, and county deployment impacts, while staff emphasized the system is data-driven, adjustable, and supported by county staging and backup. Follow-up requests for inclusion in the item request on the June 23 agenda included additional data on ambulance utilization and how often units leave Clermont, analysis of county deployment impacts in specific areas,and whether dedicated county ambulances for Clermont could be considered. REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT City Manager Van Wagner— • This is Election Qualifying Week for seats 1,3 and 5. 14 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 9,2026 • There will be a Council workshop on June 16. • Noted that a Community Redevelopment Agency(CRA)approved downtown master plan proposal may require formal CRA consideration and requested scheduling a special CRA meeting, potentially June 23 at 2:30 p.m., to review and consider approval after confirming procedural requirements. Council discussed whether a CRA special meeting is required to review and approve the downtown master plan proposal, with differing views on whether prior CRA authorization already allows staff to proceed versus needing formal reconsideration. • Downtown Wine Stroll on June 19. • There will be Comprehensive Plan Meetings on June 15, 16 and 17. Mayor Murry requested an update on when Council will receive the numbers on the potential impact of the tax bill proposal, and City Manager Van Wagner said they were expected to be emailed out later that day and would be confirmed. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT City Attorney Waugh— • Provided an update on the pending tax reform proposal,noting it could impact ad valorem funding and budget flexibility if approved, but that outcomes are uncertain pending a 60 percent voter threshold and staff will continue to bring forward mitigation options. • There is a new development on the Lake County impersonation lawsuit involving Lean Solutions Group, noted coordination with Google's attorneys, and expects another update in about three weeks. • There is an e-bike ordinance under review,a dark sky ordinance planned for the July Planning and Zoning agenda, and a proposed notice expansion item also set for July Planning and Zoning consideration. • Requested possible dates for a shade session in July. Council discussed scheduling the shade meeting on July 7 at 5:00 p.m. as a workable time, with City Attorney Waugh noting it would be confirmed with legal counsel and properly noticed. CITY COUNCIL REPORT Council Member Myers— • Spoke about the proposed property tax changes. • Happy Father's Day. Council Member Petersen— • Spoke about the proposed property tax changes. Council Member Strange— • Spoke about the proposed property tax changes. 15 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 9,2026 • Asked if Planning and Zoning received the criteria they went over a few months ago. City Attorney Waugh stated that it was discussed at Planning and Zoning, is still in development,and will return to the board for additional feedback before moving forward. • Requested an update on the administrative variance ordinance that was previously requested and inquired whether it is currently in progress. Deputy City Manager Matthys confirmed the administrative variance ordinance is in progress and is being developed in coordination with staff input and review of other jurisdictions to determine a suitable framework to bring back to Council. • Provided a tourism update noting significant changes at the County level,including the resignation of the tourism director,Ryan Ritchie,a reported restructuring of the tourism office under Economic Development, concerns about potential changes to tourism funding priorities and capital fund distribution, and planned discussion with Tourism Development Council representatives at the upcoming July meeting. Council Member Bain— • Spoke about what cities can and cannot do with relation to spending money and putting out information regarding ballot initiatives. • He commended the flow of the meeting tonight.Informed Council he will bring back Council rules at next meeting to continue progress. • Fifth Tuesday forum on June 30 at 6pm at Historic Village. Deputy City Manager Matthys—No report. Mayor Murry— • Thanked everyone for attending the mayor's luncheon. • Questioned the difference between pre-filed and qualified for elections. Deputy City Clerk Wisniewski explained that pre-filing allows candidates to submit initial paperwork and open accounts, while qualifying week is when all remaining required documents must be submitted to officially become a qualified candidate. • Spoke about the proposed property tax changes. • Asked staff to think about more public and private partnerships. 16 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 9,2026 JOURN: With no further comments,this meeting adjourned at 6:57 pm. fl r - APPROVED: 3 x -Ss j Tim Murry,Ma r ATTEST: ` Tracy Ackroyd Howe,MMC City Clerk 17