Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7.28.26 City Council Minutes _ City of Cler�rsont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28, 2026 CALL 1'O O12IJER The City Council met in a regular meeting on Tuesday, July 28, 2026, at 3:00 pm in the Clenmont City Council Chambers" Mayor Murry called the meeting to order at 3:00 pm with the following Council Members present: Council Members Strange,Bain,Petersen and Myers_ Other City ofYrcials present were City Attorney Waugh, Deputy City Manager Matthys and Deputy City Clerk Wisniewski_ INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Brian Broadway of Living Message Church gave the invocation, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT Natalie Kalrler, Clermont Main Street — stated that the organization received three Florida Main Street Awards from the Florida Secretary of State at the recent state conference.The awards recognized Clermont on Screen,the Flag Walk event,and the orgarrization•s rebrarrdirrg and website redesign,which includes a directory of more than 217 downtown businesses" She highlighted the successful children•s park design event, which drew approximately 75 participants and generated creative concepts that will be shared with the design team and City Parks" She announced the launch of the"With Love from Clermont••art initiative, a project that will commission 50 locally inspired paintings for display in downtown businesses beginning in Sept—]-, with an artist call currently open and a public launch planned at the September 13 Farrrrers Market. She also announced that Clenront Main Street and the City of Clermont will host the 2027 Florida Main Street Conference, bringing approximately 250-300 attendees from across the state" Planning is underway, and corrurrunity members are invited to participate in the planning team once conference dates are finalized. Ben Anderson, Drew Avenue—requested a new speed study For Lakeshore Drive between Hooks Street and East Avenue due to ongoing speeding concems and a recent rollover crash. Mayor Murry asked City Manager Van Wagner to coordinate with the Police Chief to conduct an updated study_ Dennis Allard,Nature Cove Lane—praised the Clermont Police Department following multiple ride-along, commended ofiFrcers for their professionalism and service, encouraged support and prayers for law enforcement and first responders, and highlighted the department's breast cancer awareness patch fundraiser. Sarah Jo Layland,East Avenue—urged the City to strengthen zoning regulations for marijuana dispensaries and smoke shops,citing concerns about their proximity to schools,child safety,and the availability oFTHC and similar products marketed in ways that appeal to children. City Attorney Waugh explained that the dispensary was properly pe itted and that the city Followed applicable state law and restrictions" Ms" Layland acknowledged the permitting process but expressed concerns that state regulations,including the 500-foot distance requirement,were insuf£cient and requested that the city pursue changes to local regulations where possible"City Attorney Waugh noted that the city,s authority is limited by state law but that available options could be discussed with Council. 1 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28,2026 Banks Helfrich, Clay Road District — spoke about American diversity, unity, and individual freedoms, emphasizing the nation's history of immigration, varied backgrounds, and the importance of coming together as the United States. Charlene Forth, Desoto Street — expressed opposition to increasing City Council compensation, emphasizing that elected officials serve as public servants and should prioritize stewardship of taxpayer funds over personal financial benefits. Sterling Fry, 1647 First Street — thanked the city for addressing prior road concerns and requested that alternative traffic-calming measures, such as speed tables,be considered instead of additional stop signs to address speeding issues. Vincent Niemiec,Regency Hills—provided a correction for the public record regarding community sizes, noting that Kings Ridge is larger than Heritage Hills and emphasizing the importance of using accurate population and community data when making city decisions. Otis Taylor, 3686 Caladesi—highlighted the success of the Champion Circle youth program,thanking the city's police and fire departments and community partners for engaging with 17 young men through mentorship, career exposure, and activities designed to strengthen relationships between youth and public safety officers. AGENDA CHANGES City Manager Van Wagner informed the Council of the following agenda change: City Manager Van Wagner requested for this item to be tabled for September 22,2026. Item No. 10-Resolution No.2025-043R,Residential Utility Rate Reduction A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY,FLORIDA,ESTABLISHING RESIDENTIAL UTILITY RATE DISCOUNTS FOR PERSONS AGED 65 AND OLDER; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT, SEVERABILITY, ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENERS ERROR, PUBLICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Deputy City Clerk Wisniewski read the title aloud. Council Member Petersen motioned to table Resolution No. 2025-043R to September 22, 2026. Seconded by Council Member Myers. Council Member Bain requested tabling the item until December 8 to allow time for the proposed tax referendum election results to be available and considered as part of the broader budget discussion. City Manager Van Wagner stated that staff were comfortable with either date,leaving the decision to Council. Council Member Petersen amended his motion to table Resolution No. 2025-043R to December 8.2026. Seconded by Council Member Myers. The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing aye. It was announced that Council Member Strange was participating via telephone. 2 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28,2026 CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Murry advised the next item on the agenda for consideration was the Consent Agenda and requested anyone wishing to have any item pulled for discussion to please come forward at this time. Item No. 1 -Meeting Minutes Consider approval of the June 16, 2026, Council Workshop, June 23, 2026, Council Meeting and July 7, 2026, Council Budget Workshop minutes. Item No. 2-Surplus Request Consider approving and declaring the end-of- life inventory as surplus from the departments of Fire, Human Resources, Information Technology, Police, and Parks and Recreation and providing disposal per the Procurement Policy. Item No.3-Bishop Field Special Technical Consider appointing 7 members to the Bishop Advisory Committee Field Special Technical Advisory Committee based on applications received. Item No. 4- Request for Proposal Award Consider RFP award and execute a Term Crossing Guard Services Contract with All City Management Services, Inc. to provide Crossing Guard Services for the Police Department. Item No.5-Piggyback Purchase Consider approval under the Florida Sheriffs Fire Utility Vehicle and Tractor Association Contract No. FSA23-EQU21.1 with Crystal Tractor & Equipment to purchase one Kubota Tractor and one Kubota Utility Vehicle in total amount of$74,109. Item No.6-Piggyback Term Contract Consider approval to piggyback the Orange Heavy Truck Mechanical and Electrical Repair County Public Schools Term Contract No. Services ITB25105 with Cumberland International Trucks of Florida, LLC to provide heavy truck mechanical and electrical repair services. Item No. 7-Piggyback Purchase Consider purchase approval under the Florida Police Vehicles Sheriffs Asso. Contract No. FSA25-VEL33.0 with Garber Ford, Inc. and under the State of Florida Contract No. 25-10000-26-STC with HHWP Inc. DBA Holler Hyundai, to purchase eight police vehicles in the total budgeted amount of$310,879.44. 3 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28,2026 Item No.8—Term Contract Award Consider Awarding Term Contracts to Aldi Sidewalk, Driveway, and Concrete Improvements Homes Group Inc., All Terrain Tractor Service Inc., APEC LLC, BSLN-US-8 Construction Services LLC,Derelle Inc.,Excavators of Central Florida, High Standard Construction Inc., PSG Concrete&Excavation LLC,Stage Door II LLC, and Structway Construction, Inc. for continuing services. Item No. 9—Resolution No. 2026-027R Consider approval of the Resolution to support the acquisition and permanent conservation of property within the Ferdnale Special Area under the County's Park Acquisition Fund. Council Member Bain questioned Consent Agenda Item No. 3 and whether a Bishop Field Advisory Committee applicant who does not reside in Lake County could be appointed since the staff report listed residency as a requirement. City Attorney Waugh explained that the resolution language included alternative qualifications separated by"or"allowing the applicant's local coaching experience to satisfy the requirement without reopening the application process. Council Member Myers motioned to approve Consent Agenda Items No. 1-9. Seconded bv_ Council Member Petersen.The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing aye. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Item No. 10—This item was addressed earlier in the meeting. Item No. 11 —Ordinance No.2026-024,Stormwater Management Final AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY,FLORIDA,AMENDING CHAPTER 18 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO INCLUDE DEFINITIONS AND PROHIBITIONS RELATING TO ILLICIT DISCHARGES AND ILLICIT CONNECTIONS TO THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM AND TO ESTABLISH INSPECTION, MONITORING, AND ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY RELATING THERETO; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT,SEVERABILITY,ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER'S ERRORS, CODIFICATION, PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE. Deputy City Clerk Wisniewski read the title aloud. Mayor Murry opened public comments.There were no comments.Mayor Murry closed public comments. Council Member Bain noted that the item was a required cleanup action mandated by the State. 4 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28, 2026 Council Member Bain motioned to approve Ordinance No. 2026-024. Seconded by Council Member Myers.The motion passed by roll call vote 5-0 with all members present voicing aye Item No. 12—Ordinance No.2026-028,Duke Energy Final AN ORDINANCE GRANTING TO DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC d/b/a DUKE ENERGY, NON-EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS OF WAY UTILIZATION FRANCHISE; PRESCRIBING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS RELATED TO THE OCCUPANCY OF MUNICIPAL STREETS AND RIGHTS OF WAY IN THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA,FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING ELECTRIC SERVICE;PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY OF PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Deputy City Clerk Wisniewski read the title aloud. City Attorney Waugh presented the updated Duke Energy franchise ordinance, explaining that it followed approximately a year of negotiations after the prior 30-year agreement expired.The new 10-year agreement maintains the City's existing franchise fee, modernizes permitting processes, provides access to Duke resources for City infrastructure projects, and includes commitments to collaborate on priorities such as underground utilities,trail areas,downtown reliability,and solar street lighting. Duke Energy Director of Government and Community Relations Katie Christian thanked Council and staff for their collaboration in reaching the updated franchise agreement and expressed the company's commitment to working with the city on identified priorities, including utility undergrounding, downtown reliability,and solar street lighting. Mayor Murry asked about the status of lighting on Excalibur Road before the start of school.City Attorney Waugh stated that Lake County confirmed the lighting had been installed and paid for, with the city assuming ongoing maintenance costs, Mayor Murry opened public comments. There were no comments.Mayor Murry closed public comments. Council Member Bain questioned whether concerns previously raised by Council Member Strange regarding undergrounding, solar, and green power initiatives were addressed in the updated Duke Energy agreement. City Attorney Waugh stated that the agreement addressed those items and that any remaining concerns could be addressed through continued communication with Duke Energy. Council Member Bain motioned to approve Ordinance No. 2026-028. Seconded by Council Member Petersen. The motion passed by roll call vote 5-0 with all members present voicing aye NEW BUSINESS Item No. 13—Fiscal Year 2027 Proposed Ad Valorem Millage Rate Finance Director Borror informed Council that pursuant to Florida Statutes,the City must inform the Lake County Property Appraiser by August 4, 2026, of the proposed maximum Ad Valorem millage rate for Fiscal Year 2027.The proposed maximum millage rate will be included in the property tax notices mailed to all City property owners by the Lake County Property Appraiser in August. 5 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28,2026 This notice of the proposed rate also includes the date of the public hearing to adopt the tentative millage rate, which is Thursday, September 10, 2026, at 5:30 pm. The final millage rate for Fiscal Year 2027 will be approved by the City Council at a public hearing on Thursday, September 24, 2026, at 5:30 pm. The final rate may be lower than the proposed maximum millage rate,but it may not be higher. Per the Budget Workshop on July 8,2026,the majority of the City Council recommended that the proposed maximum millage rate be adopted at 4.2900 mils for Fiscal Year 2027. This reflects a decrease from the current year's rate of 4.5900. Mayor Murry opened public comments. Otis Taylor. 3686 Caladesi—questioned whether the proposed bill's passage and the City lowering its rate in September could create issues Joe Fumasi, 2693 Jumping Jack Way—expressed support for returning to the 4.2900 millage rate. Mayor Murry closed public comments. Council Member Petersen motioned to accept the ad valorem rate of 4.2900. Seconded by Council Member Myers. The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing ay Item No. 14—Resolution No. 2026-024R A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA CREATING A DOWNTOWN PARKING GARAGE SPECIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; PROVIDING FOR THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE; APPOINTMENT BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND DUTIES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT, SEVERABILITY, ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER'S ERRORS, PUBLICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Deputy City Clerk Wisniewski read the title aloud. Deputy City Manager Matthys clarified that the item before Council was only the resolution establishing the Technical Advisory Committee,the next item will be to discuss committee membership. Mayor Murry noted that the resolution may need to be amended to adjust the eligibility requirements for the committee members, as it may currently exclude a potential member who does not reside within the city but has an interest in downtown through involvement with the Clermont Main Street. Council Member Bain suggested amending the qualification language to include director level responsibilities or involvement with organizations such as Clermont Main Street, Historic Village, and the Chamber of Commerce that support the City of Clermont. City Attorney Waugh agreed that this interpretation would address the concern and clarify eligibility for members. Council Member Bain motioned to approve the resolution interpreting; that last line to include membership to director level responsibility or involvement in organizations such as Clermont Main Street,Historic Village,Chamber of Commerce,etc. devoted to the city of Clermont. 6 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28,2026 Council Member Strange inquired if they would like to increase the number of committee members,noting there were originally 10 applicants and asking whether the committee size should remain at seven or be expanded to allow more participation. Council Member Bain informed her that one applicant had withdrawn,leaving nine applicants. Council Member Bain amended his motion to include up to 9 members. Seconded by Council Member Strange.The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing aye. Mayor Murry opened public comments. Vincent Niemiec, Regency Hills—asked whether the names of the nine applicants would be made public and displayed with the current item or presented during the following agenda item regarding committee members. Mayor Murry stated that the applicants will be shown and discussed on the next item. Mayor Murry closed public comments. Council discussed whether Clermont Main Street should have a designated representative on the committee. It was noted that Main Street members had the opportunity to apply through the nomination process and could still participate by attending meetings or providing input without a designated seat. The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing aye. Item No. 15—Downtown Parking Garage Special Technical Advisory Committee Deputy City Manager Matthys advised that Council could appoint up to nine members from the nine submitted applicants. He explained that the committee was created to evaluate potential parking garage sites, including the Seventh Street location and the area behind City Hall, review site pros and cons and preliminary designs, and provide recommendations to Council on the preferred site and future design selection. The committee would also assist staff during the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process for design services and continue providing input before the project advances to construction procurement. Mayor Murry clarified that,with the amendment approved on the previous item,all applicants would serve on the committee except Jayson Stringfellow,who had withdrawn this application. Council discussed clarifying the purpose and scope of the committee to ensure everyone had the same understanding.Council Member Strange expressed that her intent was for the committee to work with staff and professionals to develop design concepts for potential parking garage locations,not to select a design firm. It was confirmed that the committee would review site options and design concepts,provide input on preferred designs,and make recommendations to Council,with Council retaining final approval authority. Council also discussed providing staff with flexibility and resources to explore multiple design options, noting the importance of investing appropriately in the planning process for this project. Additionally, Council reviewed the motion approved at the June 23 meeting,which included two components:creating a citizen committee to work with staff on garage concepts, estimated budgets, and recommendations for the Seventh Street/Minneola Avenue and City Hall locations within 60 days;and separately pursuing a request for information (RFI) to explore public-private partnership opportunities for alternative parking solutions within the CRA. 7 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28,2026 Council discussed the committee's timeline, funding needs,and resources required.Council Member Bain questioned whether the original 60-day timeline for the June 23 motion remained applicable and emphasized the need to avoid delaying the process while still allowing adequate time for quality concepts to be developed.Council Member Strange stated her intent was to receive an update by the second Council meeting in August and use the September 22 date to review ideas,public input, and potential costs,while acknowledging the process could extend beyond 60 days due to procurement requirements. Council discussed authorizing up to$50,000 for design-related assistance so staff and the committee would not be limited in developing multiple design options, noting that the funds were not currently budgeted. City Attorney Waugh advised that because the funding was not included in the budget, Council would need to allocate the funds and complete a budget amendment, but a motion to allocate the funds could occur immediately with the formal amendment addressed later. Council Member Strange also suggested the possibility of using Comprehensive Plan funding for the work, with City Attorney Waugh indicating that option could potentially be considered pending discussion with staff. City Manager Van Wagner introduced Economic Development Director Norris who would be heading the committee's work and asked him to take a few moments to discuss the item and its purpose with the Council. Economic Development Director Norris explained that the committee's role is to first identify the community's priorities and desired features for a parking garage before any designs are created. He said defining the "program" upfront will allow the Council to evaluate multiple concepts and make more informed decisions. Once the committee develops its recommendations, conceptual designs and cost estimates can be prepared, potentially using funding from the City's comprehensive planning process. He added that the committee members are knowledgeable and well-suited to guiding the project. Council Member Strange asked Economic Development Director Norris how much funding would be needed to develop parking garage concepts. Economic Development Director Norris estimated that up to $50,000 would be sufficient for the concept phase, and the Council agreed that amount should provide the necessary resources. The discussion also focused on maintaining project momentum, with Council expressing a desire to have the committee complete its work within 60 days so that location decisions could be made by the end of September. There was consensus that the committee should provide concepts and preliminary cost estimates for both potential locations, allowing the Council to select a site before proceeding with the design and bidding process for the parking structure Mayor Murry opened public comments. Anna Sinclair,575 W.Minneola—asked whether members of the newly formed parking garage committee would be subject to Florida's Sunshine Law. City Attorney Waugh stated that based on how the committee was established,it would likely be subject to Sunshine Law and advised members to err on the side of caution. He clarified that committee members could still interact socially and discuss unrelated topics but should avoid discussing any matters that could come before the committee for consideration. Mayor Murry closed public comments. 8 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28,2026 Council Member Bain motioned to approve item number 15 downtown parking garage Mecial technical advisory committee with an authorization of allocation of up to$50,000, to be authorized where from at the next meeting, and to have this committee make a recommendation to us within 60 days of designs for garages at 7th and Minneola and City Hall locations,includingc oncept plans and estimated budgets and then also simultaneously having staff do what they're doing and they can work with this committee once they get that back. Seconded by Council Member Myers. Mayor Murry asked whether the proposed process met all legal requirements, including those related to funding. City Attorney Waugh confirmed that he believed the city complied and asked whether the committee had already been appointed,and it was clarified that the appointments had not yet been made. Council Member Bain amended his motion to include appointing the nine applicants that were presented to the committee.Seconded by Council Member Myers.The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing ave. Item No. 16—Council Member Request Council Member Bain presented two proposed changes to the City Council Rules of Conduct regarding meeting procedures and agenda review. The first proposal would establish a structured speaker rotation during meetings, allowing Council Members unlimited time to ask questions and gather information from staff, applicants,and speakers,while limiting individual statements on agenda items to three minutes with the ability for the Mayor or Council to extend the time. The rotation would begin with a different Council seat each meeting, with the mayor or presiding officer speaking last. He explained that the goal was to improve meeting flow, prevent members from speaking over one another, and create a clear distinction between fact-finding questions and Council comments. The second proposal would create a joint agenda review meeting with Council Members,the City Manager, Deputy City Manager, and department directors in place of individual agenda review meetings. He suggested holding the meeting at 9:00 a.m. on the Monday before Council meetings for staff to present agenda items and for Council to ask questions and request additional information. He clarified that the meeting would be for informational purposes only, with no votes or official action taken, and proposed allowing public comment at the conclusion of the meeting. He noted the change could improve efficiency by reducing the amount of staff time spent on separate individual agenda reviews. Mayor Murry opened public comments. Joe Fumasi, 2693 Jumping jack Way — expressed appreciation for Council Member Bain's proposed changes but asked whether there would be an enforcement mechanism if Council Members intentionally continued violating the meeting rules,noting the importance of maintaining an orderly process. Vincent Niemiec, Regency Hills — spoke in support of the meeting structure proposal but expressed concerns about the proposed agenda review meetings and public comment,cautioning that open discussions during information-gathering sessions could potentially put the city at a disadvantage. 9 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28,2026 Ana Sinclair,575 W.Minneola—spoke in support stating that a structured process could help keep meetings organized and efficient. She suggested allowing Council Members to ask questions before public comment so they can address resident concerns more effectively and ensure the public feels heard. Mayor Murry closed public comments. Council Members generally supported Council Member Bain's proposed meeting structure changes.They expressed support for the rotation process and time limits for Council discussion,noting it would improve organization and meeting efficiency.Concerns were raised regarding enforcement of the rules and whether a public agenda review meeting would create another Council meeting, potentially exposing internal question-and-answer discussions and adding to workload. Council Members recognized the value of a collaborative agenda review process but suggested exploring alternatives,such as a private review meeting or a different schedule. Council Member Bain addressed concerns regarding enforcement and parliamentary procedures,explaining that the current Council Rules already provide a process for raising a point of order or point of privilege, with the City Attorney serving as the advisory parliamentarian and the mayor or presiding officer making final rulings subject to Council appeal. He encouraged Council Members to use these procedures to help maintain orderly meetings.He acknowledged concerns regarding the proposed agenda review meetings and recommended removing that item from the proposal for now while continuing the discussion in the future. He reiterated that the primary focus was the meeting structure changes,including the speaking rotation and time limits,and supported trying the suggestion of allowing Council questions before public comment and Council statements to improve meeting flow. Council Member Bain motioned to approve items 1 A.B,C remove item 2 of the resolution. Seconded by Council Member Myers. Council Member Strange asked about the procedural impact of making a motion before public input.City Attorney Waugh explained that public comment is not required for non-public hearing items unless requested by a speaker, and that making a motion before public comment would not prevent Council from allowing public input. After discussion, Council agreed to try the revised meeting flow on a trial basis, allowing Council questions first, followed by public comment and Council statements, without formally adding it to the rules yet. The item remained as written, with the understanding that the process could be revisited and codified later if needed. The motion passed with all members present voting aye. Item No. 17—Resolution No.2026-021R, CityVet CUP A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY,FLORIDA,GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR A VETERINARY CLINIC TO OPERATE WITHIN A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WITH C-1 LIGHT COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT USES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT,SEVERABILITY,ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENERS ERROR,PUBLICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 10 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28,2026 Deputy City Clerk Wisniewski read the title aloud. Development Services Planner Day presented the item.City Vet,on behalf of the applicant, is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a veterinary clinic to operate on a property that is currently undergoing site review.The property is located at the Southeast corner of South US Highway 27 and Citrus Tower Blvd intersection,within the Governors Lake Commerce Center Planned Unit Development. The applicant is proposing to build out a new animal clinic within the future multi-tenant shell building. The clinic will operate entirely indoors and offer services such as checkups, diagnoses, dental care, and minor surgery to small animals.No overnight boarding or the treatment of large animals,such as livestock, will be provided. Business hours will be Monday through Friday from lam to 6pm and Saturday from 8am to 2pm.The clinic will be preparing a waste management plan that includes an internal pet relief area. In the future,they may add an outdoor relief area with a monitored waste station. The property is governed by Ordinance No. 2020-24, which allows for mixed-use development with C-1 Light Commercial uses.The veterinary clinic may be comparable to retail or medical office use within this district due to the services being offered. Additionally, the parcel is situated between commercial development on the North, South,and West sides of the parcel,while Lake Felter provides a buffer on the East side. The nearest residential use is approximately 1,100ft away,across South US Highway 27 and the nearest veterinary clinic is approximately one and a half miles away,south of Hartwood Marsh Road.Based on the site's location and surrounding uses, staff find the proposed use compatible with the district and would not be more obnoxious than existing permitted uses. When evaluating a request for a Conditional Use Permit, Section 101-212 of the Land Development Code outlines specific development standards that are required to be met.Staff have reviewed the application and find the proposed use can meet the general criteria for approval and will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the surrounding community. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval,5 to 0,of Resolution No.2026-021 R,as presented. Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 2026-021 R. Jim Graham, Vice President of Real Estate for City Vet, introduced himself to the Council and stated that he was available to answer any questions regarding the agenda item. Mayor Murry opened public comments. There were no comments.Mayor Murry closed public comments. Council discussed staffing, hiring practices, and the scope of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Mr. Graham explained that the clinic would be led by a local veterinarian and staffed with locally recruited employees, beginning with approximately 7-8 employees and growing to 15-20 over three years, with additional local economic benefits from construction and future development. Council Member Strange sought clarification on whether approving the CUP would also approve the site's layout,and City Attorney Waugh confirmed that the action only authorized a veterinary clinic as a permitted use on the overall property,while the site plan would be reviewed separately at a later date. 11 11 IN City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28, 2026 Additional discussion clarified that the applicant was leasing space rather than developing the entire commercial center and anticipated the Clermont location becoming the company's fourth clinic in the Orlando area. Council Member Bain motioned to approve Resolution No. 2026-021 R. Seconded by Council Member Myers. The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing awe. Mayor Murry recessed the meeting at 5:04pm. Mayor Murry reconvened the meeting at 5:1 Opm. Item No. 18—Citizen Request Charlene Forth presented a detailed report expressing concerns about the quality of life in Clermont's historic downtown R-3 residential neighborhood, stating that longstanding issues raised since 2021 have gone unaddressed. She argued that increased traffic,noise, outdoor music,alcohol-related activity,parking problems, speeding, and special events associated with downtown businesses have negatively impacted neighborhood safety, property values, and residential character, while also raising concerns about emergency vehicle access and investor-owned rental properties. Ms.Forth cited provisions of the City's R- 3 zoning regulations, asserted that current conditions conflict with the intent of the district, warned of potential litigation if corrective action is not taken, and urged the city to implement additional parking restrictions,traffic controls,parking enforcement,noise regulations,and stronger protections for the historic residential neighborhood. Mayor Murry opened public comments. Vincent Niemiec, Regency Hills — urged Council to address worsening downtown traffic and safety concerns, citing congestion, roadway changes, and the Salt Shack deck expansion as decisions that could negatively impact future downtown access and pedestrian safety. Valerie Schuett, 931 W. Montrose Street— supported a downtown-specific sound ordinance, maintaining balance between businesses and residents, limiting the concentration of bars, preserving walkability and connectivity, and thoughtfully balancing downtown preservation with future growth. Joe Fumasi,2693 Jumping Jack Way—thanked the speaker for bringing forward concerns about downtown changes, noting worries about the area's character and encouraging Council to address ongoing neighborhood issues. Police Chief Graczyk addressed downtown concerns, highlighting proactive efforts through education, partnerships with businesses, Main Street, and targeted enforcement, including weekend traffic details; he noted ongoing coordination for events, parking concerns, and explored creative solutions for sound regulations and revisiting the downtown handicap parking requirement. Council discussed the noise, parking, and enforcement concerns, with Police Chief Graczyk advising that the Police Department would begin collecting baseline noise measurements in the Central Business District and review options used by other communities for noise abatement. 12 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28, 2026 Council Member Strange requested that upcoming downtown code updates address ongoing concerns related to noise, parking, and quality-of-life issues and emphasized the need for a more coordinated downtown presence among Police, Community Service Officers, and Park Rangers. Council discussed reviewing staff roles, authority,and communication to ensure observed issues are addressed appropriately. Council Member Bain emphasized balancing downtown growth and revitalization with preserving the character and quality of life for residents, focusing on proactive solutions and partnerships with businesses and the community. Bill Downs, Suncreek Brewery—acknowledged that his establishment may contribute to traffic and noise concerns but clarified that music is typically ended by 11:00 p.m., doors are closed, and outside speakers are not intended to create excessive sound. He requested clarity on downtown sound regulations and encouraged business owners to be involved in any future ordinance discussions to better understand expectations and ensure compliance. Mayor Murry closed public comments. Mayor Murry addressed concerns regarding alcohol establishments, downtown noise, and parking, noting that a previous study identified approximately 15 businesses serving alcohol within a concentrated area and expressing a desire to maintain balance while ensuring downtown remains welcoming for all ages. He encouraged businesses to provide more activities for younger residents and visitors, discussed exploring additional parking opportunities along West Avenue,and clarified that downtown noise regulations address amplified outdoor music, with quiet hours generally beginning at 10:00 p.m. Sunday—Thursday and 11:00 p.m.Friday—Saturday.He noted that some sound requirements have been included in individual conditional use permits but are not currently part of the City Code and emphasized the need to review and address concerns related to outside speakers and downtown noise. City Attorney Waugh clarified that the Noise Ordinance prohibits amplified sound, exterior loudspeakers, and similar devices from creating noise that crosses the property boundary or unreasonably disturbs neighboring properties.He noted that while the code provides restrictions,quiet hours and decibel standards have specific timeframes,with the current code addressing noise levels from 9:00 p.m.to 7:00 a.m. Council discussed concerns regarding speeding e-bikes on trails, with members expressing interest in providing Park Rangers with additional authority or resources to address unsafe activity. City Attorney Waugh clarified that the city cannot impose an arbitrary limit on the number of bars but can regulate their location through zoning restrictions, spacing requirements, and land use regulations. He also advised that the city has discretion regarding parking regulations and enforcement and noted that existing nuisance provisions may provide additional tools for addressing noise concerns. Mayor Murry acknowledged ongoing parking challenges due to narrow streets and limited capacity, emphasizing the need to balance enforcement with residents' ability to accommodate visitors. Mayor Murry addressed concerns regarding downtown alcohol establishments, noise, parking, and trail safety. He stated that while he supports downtown businesses and activity, he remains concerned about maintaining balance and ensuring downtown remains welcoming for all ages, including creating more opportunities for younger residents and visitors. 13 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28,2026 He also discussed exploring additional parking options along West Avenue,acknowledged challenges with limited parking in established neighborhoods, and supported addressing concerns related to speeding e- bikes on trails.City Attorney Waugh clarified that the Noise Ordinance prohibits amplified sound,exterior loudspeakers, and similar devices from creating noise that crosses property boundaries or unreasonably disturbs neighboring properties, and explained that current code provisions address noise levels from 9:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. He further advised that the city cannot impose an arbitrary limit on the number of bars but may regulate their locations through zoning, spacing requirements, and land use controls. Regarding parking,enforcement,and a-bike concerns,he noted that the city has discretion in regulating and enforcing its ordinances and may evaluate available tools and resources to address ongoing community concerns. Bob, VFW Quarter Master—advised that a special event permit request would be submitted for an indoor event with the VFW Riders, which may include up to 50 motorcycles, and a requested temporary closure of a portion of Desoto Street from West Avenue toward 8th Street. Evan Fracasso, 1844 121 Street —raised concerns about safety on the trail, noting that excessive speeds from both a-bike users and cyclists create safety issues and suggesting measures to reduce speeds.He also recommended clearly defining the word bar in any future regulations to avoid ambiguity. Mayor Murry addressed a-bike concerns,noting that trail speed limits are currently 15 mph.City Attorney Waugh stated that an e-bike ordinance is scheduled for an upcoming agenda for Council consideration. Mayor Murry suggested that the City Manager schedule a workshop to discuss downtown concerns and identify potential solutions. Item No. 19—Ordinance No. 2026-027, Community Development District Intro AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING, ON THE PROPOSED PROPERTY KNOWN AS SANCTUARY AT WELLNESS AND FURTHER DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND RECOGNIZING, THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, CREATED AND CHARTERED BY UNIFORM GENERAL LAW, THE UNIFORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ACT OF FLORIDA, CHAPTER 190, FLORIDA STATUTES; ACKNOWLEDGING THE UNIFORM DISTRICT CHARTER EXPRESSED IN SECTIONS 190.006-190.041, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND AS REFERENCED AND PROVIDED BY SECTION 190.004(4), FLORIDA STATUTES, AND CONFIRMED BY SECTION 189.4031(2), FLORIDA STATUTES; ESTABLISHING THE SANCTUARY AT WELLNESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT(ON THE PROPERTY PROPOSED IN THIS PETITION) AND DESIGNATING THE INITIAL MEMBERS OF THE DISTRICT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; AND, DESIGNATING THE PROPOSED LAND AREA WITHIN WHICH THE DISTRICT MAY MANAGE AND FINANCE ITS BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE, SYSTEMS, FACILITIES, SERVICES, IMPROVEMENTS AND PROJECTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND REPEAL; PROVIDING FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENERS ERROR; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE;AND PROVIDING FOR RECORDING. Deputy City Clerk Wisniewski read the title aloud. 14 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28,2026 Kristen Trucco, representing Lennar Homes, presented information regarding the proposed Sanctuary at Wellness Community Development District (CDD), explaining that the public infrastructure within the development has already received approval and the remaining consideration is determining the most appropriate entity to operate, maintain, and finance the infrastructure. She outlined the purpose, authority, transparency requirements, financial oversight, assessment process,and resident benefits of CDDs,noting that CDDs are special-purpose local governments subject to public records, sunshine laws,audits,bidding requirements, and public hearings. She advised that the proposed CDD would serve the 699-unit community, which includes planned amenities and more than $26 million in anticipated public infrastructure, and stated that the presentation was intended to address questions and provide information before the upcoming public hearing. Mayor Murry opened the public hearing. Vincent Niemiec, Regency Hills — expressed concern regarding the process for the CDD presentation, stating that applicants appear to have extended time to present directly to Council while residents are limited during public comment. Joe Fumasi,2693 Jumping Jack Way—opposed the proposed CDD,citing concerns with developer control, lack of resident oversight,and potential financial impacts to residents and the city,and requested denial of the application. Mayor Murry closed the public hearing. Council discussed the proposed CDD, including the relationship between the proposed district and the existing CDD to the south, particularly related to stormwater management and whether the two districts could operate independently without conflicts.Ms.Trucco and City Attorney Waugh clarified that the two CDDs would be separate governmental entities but could enter into an interlocal agreement to address shared stormwater maintenance responsibilities. Council questioned the transition of CDD board control from the developer to residents and were informed that state law requires both six years and 250 residents within the district before the transition occurs;however,developers may voluntarily resign from board seats earlier, allowing remaining board members to appoint residents. Ms. Trucco clarified that initial board members are selected through a landowner election process, typically controlled by the developer as the majority landowner,although the city appoints the initial members for up to 90 days through the ordinance. Council also discussed whether the city could modify the statutory transition requirements, and City Attorney Waugh advised those requirements are established by state law and likely cannot be altered locally. In response to concerns about approving the CDD,City Attorney Waugh explained that Council's decision must be based on statutory factors,including whether the CDD is the best alternative for providing the required services, and noted that a denial without sufficient evidence supporting an alternative could potentially be challenged. He emphasized that CDDs provide governmental oversight, public records requirements,and financial protection similar to other governmental entities. Council Member Myers introduced Ordinance No. 2026-027. Seconded by Council Member Bain. The motion passed 4-0 with all members present voicins Me. 15 i City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28,2026 Item No.20—Ordinance No.2026-026,Amend LDC Noticing Requirements Intro AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ARTICLE III, SECTION 101-211, "NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING", ARTICLE IV, SECTION 101-245, "NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING",ARTICLE V, SECTION 101-281,"NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING",AND ARTICLE V, SECTION 125-527, "LIVE LOCAL ACT PROJECT REVIEW PROCEDURE", OF THE CHARTER LAWS OF THE CITY OF CLERMONT, PROVIDING THAT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, VARIANCES, REZONINGS, FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS, AND LIVE LOCAL ACT APPLICATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY (450) FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY; PROVIDING THAT, WHERE ANY PROPERTY WITHIN FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY (450) FEET IS GOVERNED BY A PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, SUCH AS A CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION OR HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, NOTICE SHALL ALSO BE PROVIDED TO SUCH ASSOCIATION; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT, SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION, ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER'S ERROR, PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE. Deputy City Clerk Wisniewski read the title aloud. Mayor Murry opened the public hearing. Joe Fumasi, 2693 Jumping Jack Way—requested that signage be moved back approximately 450 feet and that future signs use large,clear block lettering so they are easily readable by drivers traveling through the area. Mayor Murry closed the public hearing. Council Member Bain clarified that the proposed change addresses mailed notifications to nearby property owners, not the physical development signs. He explained that the ordinance would expand notification distances from 150 feet, currently practiced at approximately 200 feet by staff, to 450 feet, with staff practice extending notifications to 500 feet. The update would also require notification to applicable Homeowners Association or Condominium Associations within the notification area to help ensure broader community awareness of proposed developments. He noted that signage requirements could be reviewed separately as a future discussion. Council discussed improving posted development signs by increasing their size and readability, with suggestions to require larger block lettering and explore options such as QR codes while ensuring compliance with statutory requirements. Staff and the City Attorney were asked to review sign requirements, best practices from other communities, and potential enhancements, with Council Member Strange supporting moving forward with the proposed notification change while the signage improvements are further evaluated. Council Member Bain introduced Ordinance No. 2026-026. Seconded by Council Member Myers.The motion passed 5-0 with all members present voicing aye. 16 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28,2026 REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT City Manager Van Wagner— • August 11: Joint CRA Meeting with City Council at 2:00 p.m. • August 11: Regular City Council Meeting at 3:00 p.m. • August 11: CRA Workshop regarding Parks and Recreation at 5:30 p.m. • August 18: Shade Session at 2:00 p.m. • Staff requested postponing the August 18 Workshop to September 15 for a joint session with the Planning and Zoning Commission. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT City Attorney Waugh— • Outside counsel confirmed availability for the August 11 meeting at 2:00 p.m. • Several ordinances and resolutions are anticipated to come before Council in the upcoming months. CITY COUNCIL REPORT Council Member Strange—No report. Council Member Bain— • Requested discussion on whether there is interest in addressing smoke shops and dispensaries through a potential ordinance or temporary moratorium to allow time for further review and regulation. Council expressed support for directing staff to explore options for regulating smoke shops and dispensaries, including the possibility of bringing forward an ordinance or establishing a temporary moratorium to allow time for review. City Attorney Waugh explained that a moratorium could be adopted for an initial six-month period,with the option to extend it an additional six months by resolution if needed. Council reached consensus on moving forward with having staff develop options for consideration at a future meeting. • He is working with the City Attorney to evaluate whether any ordinance updates or proactive measures are needed regarding Data Centers for our area. Council Member Myers—No report. Council Member Petersen— • Requested a status update on the surplus building across the street,asking whether it has been listed for sale and if the bidding or sale process has begun. City Manager Van Wagner stated he had just received an email from Main Street regarding a proposal for the surplus building but had not yet reviewed it and would provide more information after evaluating the proposal. 17 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28,2026 • Expressed concern about the future traffic impacts of the Lumberyard project and suggested expanding golf cart connectivity to help reduce congestion and improve downtown access. Mayor Murry— • Responded to Lumberyard traffic concerns, noting he previously requested a state traffic study of 12th Street and potential improvements at the Highway 50 intersection • Requested that staff explore a potential moratorium on marijuana dispensaries, separate from smoke shops,and consider addressing both uses along with other previously discussed topics. • Requested a letter of support for the Ferndale land preservation project approved on the consent agenda,noting the deadline and asking staff to prepare the letter for signature and submission. City Manager Matthys clarified that the resolution approved on the consent agenda could be signed by the mayor that evening and would be provided to the requester first thing the following morning. • Requested that Council establish a consistent policy regarding public comment on introduction items, noting that the practice has varied between meetings and expressing a preference to return to reading the item,voting,and moving it forward without public comment. Council discussed establishing a consistent process for public comment on ordinance introduction items. City Attorney Waugh clarified that public comment is not required on first readings. Council reached consensus that first readings will generally proceed without public comment unless there is a substantial proposed change or a specific need identified by Council, with public input available during the required second reading. City Manager Van Wagner advised that Clermont Main Street submitted an offer for the surplus building next door and requested the item be placed on an upcoming agenda for Council consideration. Council discussed keeping the offer details for formal agenda review, so all information is presented publicly at the same time. 18 City of Clermont MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28,2026 ADJOURN: With no further comments,this meeting adjourned at 7:06 pm. APPROVED: Tim Murry,Mayor ATTEST: Tracy Ackroy owe, MMC City Clerk 19