Loading...
12-18-1990 Regular Meeting. • ~ MINUTES LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 18, 1990 The Public Hearing of the Local Planning Agency meeting was called to order by John Sargent on December 18, 1990 at 7:00 P.M. Members present were Marilyn George, Peter Bertonaschi and Edward Ivey. Members Don Smith, Bonnie Kranz, Adelbert Evans, James Brown and Carlos Solis were absent. Also attending were Wayne Saunders City Manager, Lanny Harker Planning Director and Mimi Hauch Planning Technician. Mr. Harker invited the public attending and the Local Planning Agency to give any comments or questions they might have regarding the elements being discussed tonight (Intergovernmental Coordination and the Future Land Use Elements). Intergovernmental Coordination Element Mr. Ivey asked if the Intergovernmental Coordination Element should not also contain the need to work with the City of Groveland. Mr. Saunders stated that there was no need for this in that Groveland was not contiguous with the City of Clermont as is the City of Minneola. Mr. Bertonaschi stated that he felt the wording in Policy 3-4 beginning with "provision of funding to assist in procurement" should be changed to just "assist". This was agreed upon by all those present. Further discussion followed regarding this element, with revisions being noted. Future Land Use Element Mrs. Patricia McCaffrey asked in reference to the property that she presently owns, which is located near the northeast corner of the intersection of SR 50 and US 27, the property is now zoned commercial and it appears that it was being down zoned to R-3. Mr. Saunders stated that this land has been in the UD-5 Land Use District for the past five years, which does not allow commercial use. The Future Land Use Districts take precedence over the zoning of the property. However, within one year after submittal of the Comprehensive Plan the City will have to bring all of the development regulations into conformance, which will include the zoning. Mr. Saunders stated that Mrs. McCaffreys property could still be used for commercial development as a Planned Unit Development. Mrs. McCaffrey asked if it were normal for two parcels that adjoin to have different Land Use Districts, such as the property which is located south of SR 50 near the Oak Ridge Apartments. The Land Use District on one parcel is UD-2 which only allows a density of eight to the acre whereas the property abuts the UD-8 District which allows twelve to the acre. Mr. Saunders stated that this was done in this particular case due to the fact that this area is already so congested. Mr. Saunders stated that Policy 1-5 should be changed, in regard to the floor area ratio of .18, to exclude the Central Business District. • Further discussion followed regarding the Goals, Objectives and Policies and the remainder of the Future Land Use element. The meeting was adjourned. «' John Sargent, hairman ATTEST: Mimi Hauch, Planning Technician