2003-10
, ~,
.
.
.
-~-.~2~U316(f!~.
I RECEfilFEf- i
I M~Y 2 a 2003. I
JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE! W.ðLElLAU1JtORiTY ¡
lAKE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
AND
THE CITY OF CLERMONT
FOR THE
CRYSTAL LAKE STORMWATER PROJECT
;! '
J..- ---
{--- .J
.f
1;
THIS COOPERATIVE FUNDING AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and
between the lAKE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY, a Special District of the
State of Florida authorized and governed by Chapter 29222, Laws of Florida, as
amended, its successors and assigns, whose address is 107 North lake Avenue,
Tavares, Florida 32778, herein-after referred to as the "AUTHORITY," and THE
CITY OF CLERMONT, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida whose
address is Post Office Box 120219, Clermont, Florida 34712-0219, hereinafter
referred to as "CLERMONT."
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the AUTHORITY, was created by its Special Act, Chapter
29222, laws of Florida, for the purposes, among others, of controlling and
conserving the fresh wat~r resources of Lake County and preserving, protecting,
and improving the fish and wildlife of the county, and protecting the freshwater
resources by assisting local governments in the treatment of stormwater runoff,
and
WHEREAS, the reduction and ultimate elimination of untreated
. stormwater into our public waterways will ultimately benefit the ecology of our
waterways and the residents and tourists that use them, and
WHEREAS, it is desirable for the AUTHORITY to assist the municipalities
- of Lake County in a coordinated effort through the provision of grant funds- to
reduce the influx of untreated stormwater into the publicly owned waterways of
lake County, and
WHEREAS, the project consists of a study of the stormwater outfalls
within the 137.3-acre Crystal Lake basin, and design and - construction of
structures to eliminate direct discharge of stormwater into Crystal Lake.
Stormwater ponds and swales, rather than CDS units, will -be implemented
whenever possible as deemed by CLERMONT'S consultant. These projects will
hereinafter be referred to collectively as the "PROJECT"; and
WHEREAS, the AUTHORITY considers the PROJECT worthwhile and
desires to assist CLERMONT in funding the PROJECT, and
NOW, THEREFORE, the AUTHORITY and CLERMONT, in consideration
of the mutual terms, covenants and conditions set forth herein, agree as follows:
.
.
.
.8
. ¡
08
(-)
1.
PROJECT MANAGER AND NOTICES. Each party hereby designates the
employee. set forth below as its respective Project Manager. Project
Managers shall assist with PROJECTS coordination and shall be the party's
prime contact person. Notices or reports shall be sent to the attention of the
parties' Project Manager by U.S. mail, postage paid, to the parties'
addresses as set forth below:
Project Manager for the AUTHORITY:
Mr. Lance Lumbard
107 North Lake Avenue
Tavares, Florida 32778
Project Manager for CLERMONT:
Ms. Tamra Richardson
City Engineer
PO Box 120219
Clermont, Fl 24711
Any changes to the above representatives or addresses must be provided
to the other party in writing.
1.1
The AUTHORITY's Project Manager. is hereby authorized to
approve requests to extend any PROJECT task deadline set forth
in this Agreement. Such approval shall be in writing, shall explain
the reason for the extension and shall be signed by the
AUTHORITY's Executive Director. The AUTHORITY's. Project
Manager is not authorized to approve any time extension which will
result in an increased cost to the AUTHORITY or any time
extension which will likely delay the final PROJECT task deadline.
1.2
The AUTHORITY's Project Manager is authorized to. adjust a line
item amount in the PROJECT budget set forth in Exhibit "C" only if
the request is made from CLERMONT in writing and such
adjustment does not result in an increase to the total PROJECT
cost. Such approval shall be in writing, shall explain the reason for
the adjustment, and shall be signed by the AUTHORITY's Project
Manager and the AUTHORITY's Executive Director. The
AUTHORITY's Project Manager is not authorized to make changes
to the Scope of Work and is not authorized to approve any increase
in the not-to-exceed amount set forth in the funding section of this
Agreement.
2.
SCOPE OF WORK. Upon receipt of written notice to proceed from the
AUTHORITY, CLERMONT shall perform the services necessary to
complete the PROJECT in accordance with the Special Project Terms and
Conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" and CLERMONT's Proposed Project Plan
set forth in Exhibit "B," both attached hereto and incorporated herein. Any
,.,
.
tt
.
changes to this Scope of Work and associated costs shall be mutually
agreed to in a formal written amendment approved by the AUTHORITY's
Board of Trustees and CLERMONT prior to being performed by
CLERMONT. CLERMONT shall be solely responsible for managing the
PROJECT, including the hiring and supervising of any consultants or
contractors it engages under this Agreement.
3. FUNDING. The parties anticipate that the total cost of the PROJECT will be
SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS
($750,200.00), subject to the conditions, restrictions and limitations
contained herein. The AUTHORITY agrees to fund up to THREE
HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS
($375,100.00), or 50 percent of the water quality enhancement portion of
the PROJECT and shall have no obligation to pay any costs beyond this
maximum amount. CLERMONT agrees to fund THREE HUNDRED
SEVENTY FIVE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($375,100.00), or
50 percent of the water quality enhancement portion of the PROJECT costs
and shall be responsible for all the PROJECT cost that is not related to
water quality enhancement. CLERMONT shall be responsible for all costs
in excess of the anticipated total PROJECT cost. CLERMONT shall be the
lead party to this Agreement and shall pay PROJECT cost prior to
requesting reimbursement from the AUTHORITY.
.
3.1
The AUTHORITY shall reimburse CLERMONT for its share of
PROJECT cost in accordance with the Project Budget set forth in
Exhibit "C". CLERMONT shall contract with .consultants or
contractors in accordance with the Special Project Terms and
Conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" CLERMONT shall notify the
AUTHORITY after the preliminary engineering phase if the
PROJECT water quality related cost estimates are not
representative of the projected $750,200.00 cost initially estimated
by CLERMONT to complete the construction. CLERMONT shall
notify the AUTHORITY of all corresponding increases and
decreases that are anticipated to complete the PROJECT.
A Payments are further conditioned on the following:
I.
That CLERMONT pays its pro-rata share of the
PROJECT as outlined in this Agreement;
That CLERMONT provides the AUTHORITY the
necessary invoices and other documentation sufficient to
evidence that CLERMONT has incurred the actual
expense;
II.
.
'{
.
.
.
.-.
.
III.
That CLERMONT provides AUTHORITY written
notification from a person duly authorized by
CLERMONT to confirm that CLERMONT has incurred
the actual expense;
That CLERMONT completes the expensed portion of the
project in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications.
IV.
B. If CLERMONT does not expend its pro-rata share of the cost for
the work performed as set forth in this Agreement, the
AUTHORITY will make payment only in an amount
proportionate to that which CLERMONT has made and provides
documentation to the AUTHORITY in accordance with this
agreement.
The AUTHORITY reimbursements to CLERMONT on timely submitted
invoices shall be made to CLERMONT within thirty (30) days of receipt
of an invoice, with the appropriate support documentation, which shall
be submitted to the AUTHORITY at the following address:
LAKE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
107 North Lake Avenue
Tavares, Florida 32778
3.2 CLERMONT shall not use any AUTHORITY funds for any purposes
not specifically identified in the above Scope of Work.
3.3 The AUTHORITY shall have no obligation to reimburse CLERMONT
for any costs under this Agreement until construction of the PROJECT
has commenced.
3.4 The AUTHORITY's performance and payment pursuant to this
Agreement is contingent upon the AUTHORITY's Board of Trustees
appropriating funds for the PROJECT.
4.
CONTRACT PERIOD. This Agreement shall be effective upon execution by
all parties and shall remain in effect until September 31, 2004, unless
terminated or extended in writing by mutual written agreement of the parties.
5.
PROJECT RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS. Each party shall, upon request,
permit th.e other party to examine or audit all PROJECT related records and
documents during or following completion of the PROJECT. Each party
shall maintain all such records and documents for at least three (3) years
following completion of the PROJECT. All records and documents
generated or received by either party in relation to the PROJECT are
subject to the Puþlic Records Act in Chapter 11 9, F~orida Statutes.
.
.
.
,.
.
. ,
6.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS AND OTHER MATERIALS. All
documents, including reports, drawings, estimates, programs, manuals, and
specifications, including intellectual property and rights thereto, purchased
under this Agreement with AUTHORITY funds or developed in connection
with this Agreement shall be and remain the property of the AUTHORITY.
7.
REPORTING. CLERMONT shall provide the AUTHORITY with any and all
reports, models, studies, maps or other documents resulting from the
PROJECT.
8.
LIABILITY. Each party hereto agrees that it shall be solely responsible for
the negligent acts or omissions of its officers, employees, contractors and
agents; however, nothing contained herein shall constitute a waiver by
either party of its sovereign immunity or the limitations set forth in Section
768.28, Florida Statutes.
9.
DEFAULT. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon the other
party's default in complying with any term or condition of this Agreement, as
long as the terminating party is not in default of any term or condition of this
Agreement. To effect termination, the terminating party shall provide the
defaulting party with a written "Notice of Termination" stating its intent to
terminate and describing the term and/or condition with which the defaulting
party has failed to comply. If the defaulting party has not remedied its
default within thirty (30) days after receiving the Notice of Termination, this
Agreement shall automatically terminate.
10. RELEASE OF INFORMATION. The parties shall not initiate any verbal or
written media interviews or issue press releases on or about the PROJECT
without providing advance copies to the other party. This provision shall not
be construed as preventing the parties from complying with the public
records disclosure laws set forth in Chapter 119, Florida Statutes.
11. AUTHORITY RECOGNITION. CLERMONT shall recognize AUTHORITY
funding in any reports, models, studies, maps or other documents resulting
from this Agreement, and the form of said recognition shall be subject to
AUTHORITY approval. CLERMONT shall provide signage ~Ü the PROJECT
sites that recognizes funding for this PROJECT provided by the
AUTHORITY. All signage must meet with AUTHORITY written approval as
to form, content and location, and must be in accordance with local sign
ordinances.
12. PERMITS AND REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. CLERMONT shall obtain all
permits and all real property rights necessary to complete the PROJECT
prior to commencing any construction involved in the PROJECT. The
AUTHORITY shall have no obligation to reimburse CLERMONT for any
c::
.
.
.
;.c~
~.
costs under this Agreement until CLERMONT has obtained such permits
and rights.
13. LAW COMPLIANCE. Each party shall comply with all applicable federal,
state and local laws, rules, regulations and guidelines, relative to
performance under this Agreement.
14. DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES. The AUTHORITY expects
CLERMONT to use good faith efforts to ensure that disadvantaged business
enterprises, which are qualified under either federal or state law, .have the
maximum practicable opportunity to participate in contracting opportunities
under this project Agreement. Invoice documentation submitted to the
AUTHORITY under this Agreement shall include information relating to the
amount of expenditures made to disadvantaged businesses by CLERMONT
in relation to this Agreement, to the extent CLERMONT maintains such
information.
15. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party may assign or transfer its rights or obligations
under this Agreement, including any operation or maintenance duties
related to the PROJECT, without the written consent of the other party.
16. SUBCONTRACTORS. Nothing in this Agreement shall create, or be
implied to create, any relationship between the AUTHORITY and any
subcontractor of CLERMONT,
17. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. Nothing in this Agreement shall be
construed to benefit any person or entity not a party to this Agreement.
18. MODIFICATIONS. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement
between the parties and may be amended only in writing, signed by all
parties to this Agreement.
19. DOCUMENTS. The following documents are attached and made a part of
this Agreement. In the event of a conflict of contract terminology, priority
shall first be given to the language in the body of this Agreement, then to
Exhibit "A," and then to Exhibit "B," and then to Exhibit "C."
A. Exhibit "A"
B. Exhibit "B"
C. Exhibit "C"
Special Project Terms and Conditions
CLERMONT's Proposed Project Plans
Project Budgets
¡:;
(,
.
..
.~-~)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, or their lawful representatives, have
executed this Agreement on the day and year set forth next to their signatures
below.
~dD-- -n-;~::>J)..,~.....,-..,a- By:
Witness
.~
.
LAKE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
FederaIID#:
so¡ -(00 ~oo3
CLERMONT
By:
::~
~me. Title
FederaIID#: )9- f,t'P() 2 'it)
7
l"\ fv\.~'O'>
Date
oS: r s- o?
Date.
.
.
4.
5.
6.
.
...
:"'.
. .
EXHIBIT "A"
SPECIAL PROJECT TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1.
CONTRACTING WITH CONSULTANT AND CONTRACTOR.
CLERMONT may engage the services of a consultant(s), hereinafter
referred to as the "CONSULTANT," to design and a contractor(s),
hereinafter referred to as the "CONTRACTOR," to construct the
PROJECT in accordance with CLERMONT's Proposed Project Plan
previously submitted to the AUTHORITY and attached as Exhibit "8." If
CLERMONT engages the services of a consultant(s), CLERMONT shall
be responsible for administering the contract with the CONSULTANT.
2.
APPROVAL OF BID DOCUMENTS. CLERMONT shall obtain the.
AUTHORITY's written approval of all construction bid documents prior to
being advertised or otherwise solicited. The AUTHORITY shall not
unreasonably withhold such approval. The AUTHORITY's approval of the
construction documents does not constitute a representation or warranty
that the AUTHORITY has verified the architectural, engineering,
mechanical, electrical, or other components of the construction
documents, or that such documents are in compliance with AUTHORITY
rules and regulations or any other applicable rules, regulations, or laws.
The AUTHORITY's approval shall not constitute a waiver of CLERMONT's
obligation to assure that the design professional performs according to the
standards of his/her profession. CLERMONT shall require the design
professional to warrant that the construction documents are adequate for
bidding and construction of the PROJECT.
3.
FINAL DESIGN REPORT AND APPROVAL. CLERMONT must provide
the AUTHORITY with a final design report including as-built drawings.
CLERMONT shall obtain the AUTHORITY's approval of the final design
report prior to proceeding with implementation of the PROJECT. The
AUTHORITY shall not unreasonably withhold such approval.
AUTHORITY PARTICIPATION IN SELECTING CONSULTANT AND
CONTRACTOR. Upon notifying CLERMONT's Project Manager, the
AUTHORITY shall have the option of participating in CLERMONT's
selection of the CONSULTANT and CONTRACTOR.
APPROVAL OF CONTRACT. CLERMONT shall obtain the
AUTHORITY's prior written approval of all contracts entered into with its
CONSULTANTS and its CONTRACTORS as referenced above in item
number one of this exhibit. The AUTHORITY shall not unreasonably
withhold such approval.
COMPLETION DATES. CLERMONT shall commence construction on the
PROJECT as soon as practical and shall complete all aforementioned
R
.,8
\. ....J
.
r. - 1
.
work by the termination date of this agreement. The AUTHORITY will
have the right to visit the construction site of the PROJECT for inspection
purpqses.
.
.
Q
~
\ .."
.
~)
-.
ATTACHMENT B
Overall Project
Crystal Lake is a 26.1 ace \and locked lake located north of Highway 50 and west of East
Avenue wi1hin the CIem1ont city runits. Center Lake receives stoon water runo!f from an
137.3 acre dlClinage basin Yd1ich includes a portion of Highway 50 for the Florida Department
of Transportation.
The stocm water collection system for HigfTway 50 coDeåS runoff from an area of
approximately 19 aces. Runoff from the 19 aces is <XIDected in stoon water inlets and is
discharged through a ronaete stonnwater pipe, directly ilto QystaI Lake. The remaining
118.3 aaes il the drainage bash is axnprised largely of residential and some businesses.
The storm water runoff from this area is CDDected through a señes of storm water collection
strudJJres and eventuaDy discharges to the lake through ten separate outfall ~s.
The water quaI.ity in Crystal Lake has been a matter of increasing conœm for the City for
several years. Although the water quality is QJfI'Øntly good, the continuing runo/f discharging
directly ilto the lake is add"ng sediment and poDutants annuaDy. The runoff from Highway 50
is heavily laden with debris and pollutants and enters Crystal lake without benefit of
treatment The result is that the water quality of the lake is threatened.
Proposed StormwaœrTreatment Solution
Because the lake is located ilthe older section of the City, the land surrounding the lake is
largely buiIt-oot. The City wrrenIIy ov.ns and main!¡lins two retention ponds v.hk:h provide
treatmert for lwo of the ouIfaIIs.. The remaini'lg nine álSChalge points will require
moálfications to protect the water quality of Crystal Lake. Because of the lack of available
land, coostnJdion of additional retention ponds is not an option.
.
Pooutant loadings, debris and sediment Ie the lake can be reduced by instalUng soridlliquids
sepa¡;ition devices at each stormwater outfaD. The units, known as continuous deflective
separation (~) technology, captures greater than 95 percent of water-bome litter and
debris, and is effective il removing sediments irdu:flng sand. These U"Iits have been used
sucœssfuIIy by the Florida Department 0( T ranspor1aIion for several years now. Information
on these strudures is indJded in Attachment E. .
Proposed Design
The existing cischarge Wing that discharges runoff collected from H".g,way 50 and.
StJfT'OU"Idng areas Wll be modified. The pipes wiD be altered to accommodate the new
structures. The projeå will SBIVe a dJaI fu1dion: (1) a redudion in pollutant loadings to the
lake, and (2) reduction il sediment into the lake.
Operation and Maintenance
Operation and maintenance wiD be peñormed by City staff. Si1ce al the proposed
improvements wiD be located on City property, they will become part of the City's normal
maintenance routine. The City already ov.ns the equipment needed to dean and maintain
the LnÏts.
.
10
.'
f'
.8
<' )'
"t '..
.
AlTACHMENT B Con't
Estimated Costs, Schedule and Spending Plan
Estimated rosts for the project are as folbNs:
ITEM ESTIMATED COST
Mobilization ~,600
aearing 800 Grubbing 13,500
Modifications Ie ExisOOg SIormwater Pipes 18,000
Purd1ase and Install CDS Structures 525,000
RestoIation 10,800
SUBTOTAL 572,900
Con' 15%) 86 000
Enaineeñna (10%) 57,300
Survevina (6%) 34 000
TOTAL PROJECT COST 750 200
1>,G
.
Schedule
The City has not yet retained an engineering firm Ie develop construction plans and
specifICationS for !he project. The project is expected to be bid early 2002 and.
construction is expected to be completed by the end of the Citfsfiscal year (September
30,2002). Depeooing upon funding, the project may be constructed in phases.
.
?n
~.
: .
t'
.'
.
ATTACHMENT C
PUBLIC BENEFIT
The water quality of Crystal Lake is fair due to the untreated stormwater that regularly
enters the lake. Crystal Lake is located in a well-established residential neighborhood.
The area is used heavily by local residents for personal recreation. Although the lake is
still in good to fair condition, the City would like to preserve the quality of the wate~dy.
Once the quality deteñorates, correction of the problem would be much more costly and
involved.
The treatment provided by the proposed improvements will benefit the City and its
residents tIvough aesthetics and improved pubfic health and safety. In general, the City
is a strong proponent of providing treatment of stonnwater pñor to enteñng any natural
body of water and funds projects annually to retrofit existing stormwater systems which
discharge direct1y into natural water bodies.
.
.
.
"Ji
'.
~~
.
'~ ..
~,~J
. '
.'
.
ATTACHMENTD
POLLUTANT REMOVAL
Clystal Lake is a 28.1 aae land I~ lake that mceives storm water runoff from an 137.3
ace drai1age basin which includes a portion 0( H'~ 50 for the Florida Department of
Transportation (FOOT). Approximately 38 perœnt 0( the runoff enteñng Center Lake a:lmes
from the stDrmwa1er coIIecIion.system for Highway 50. A breakdO'M1 0( the Crys1a/ Lake
drainage basin is as foDows:
Area % Impervious Acreage
H"lQhway 50 CoUection System 92 51.7
Residential 40 85.6
TOTAL 59.6 137.3
The proposed projed. includes treating aU the IU1OIf entering the lake either by the existing
stormwaœr ret.ention ponds or by the newly CXX1Structed s1ormwaIer pollution control devices.
Using these tv.o methods, it is estimated that 95 percent 0( water-bome itter and debris ......11
be capIure prior Ie ~ CiystaI Lake, Nso I1'J..ICh 0( the sediment i1duding sand ......11 be
diverted.
.
.
??
.
.
.
0"<" '.1
. '"'>co
.
.
n
"
c.
. ..
..
CDS Technologies, Inc. provides products and services to municipalities,
public agencies and industry, based on the unique solidslliquids separation
technology known as Continuous Deflective Separation (CDS). The parent
company, CDS Technologies ltd. - which is headquartered in Australia -
has developed and owns this non-blocking screening technology, which is
protected by US, Australian and international patent applications.
Continuous deflective separation (CDS) technology is an innovative and highly
effective new solution to address wet weather stormwater pollution problems.
CDS technology offers an effective method of preventing pollutants ~ such as
street litter, trash and debris. vegetation and coarse sediments and the attached
pollutants -n~ents and heavy metals - from entering our waterways.
As with most great technological breakthroughs. simplicity prevails: The
CDS system controls the water-to enable a natural separation of solids from
the water calT}'ing them. The first non-blocking and non-mechanical system,
CDS uses fine-screening to provide a much more efficient and cost-effective
alternative to previous generations of technologyo The CDS technology is
an essential first component of a "1reatment train" to protect and enhance
the perfonnanœ of other filtration systems and biological systems.
1he major application for the technology is oJITently to dean gross pollution
fmm stormwater before it enters natural waterways, but through continuing
research. the company has extendE.od its product range for use in removing
oil and grease from stormwater flows, industrial and food processing indus-
tries and to separate floatables and remove solids from combined sewer
overflows (CSO).
.
CDS: Non-blocking and Non-Mechanical
.. Art effective separator of gross pollutants without
the separation screen becoming blocked."
" No conditions could be created which produced
any significant blocking of the screen."
Mom """"Y 01 rauCIs 01.. hIopondont ""<Iy by Mcnall I.Womi1y.
~ .......... Dr: Tony If. F. IIbng. o.p.m.w 01 ow ~
"""'-Y I \I9S
CDS I8chnology uses indir&Ct saeening to captllre """" rhe :unal/ ,""Ie,;.'s
Pollutant patlid.. remain ,.;-thin the unit while the ...ler passes through the
separaOOn saeen. .
S.f. Pol/utant Remov.I Removing debris caughl by CDS units is
"'-cost. g/e .nd 'My. Captured maleri.1s an be removed simply and
mechanically by basket ,,",se flow I.k. off (pumpI. clam-shell budœ~ 0(
suction - eliminating the need fO( hum.n hond/õng 01 d.ngelOus m,'ena/s.
.
24
..
CDS Technology Key Features
Efficient
. Captures greater than 95 percent of water-borne
liner and debris.
. Effective in removing partides as small as coarse
sediments.
, Retains all trapped pollutants when CDS pn:x:essing
capaàty is exceeded during infrequent high flow events.
Large Flow Rang.
1 to 300 cubic feet per second (CFS).
Non-BIoddng and Non-M.chanlcal
5epanltion saeen does not dog and requires no power
or supporting infrastructure.
Low-Cost,. Safe and Easy Pollutant R.moval
low maintenance by mechanical rather than human
methods.
Colt-éffectlw
Lowest avenin cost per pound of gross pollutants
removed.
Unobtnlsl.... and EMy to Instðll
Compact and below ground. Umited space rec¡uire-
ment. Ideal for retrofit and redevelopment applications.
. AppUcations
. Stormwater
, Free 011 and g",~ controls with sorbets
.CSO
. Pretreatment Water
, Industrial
. . Pretteatmentlor OIW 5epISand filteB media
. Biofiltraûon ponds and ¡'filtraûon basins
How th. CDS Syst.m WOtb:
Pollutants .re c.op~ inside 11>.
separation dlambeç while the WI""
pa.... through .he separation
screen.
.
.
.
SUMP
OPTIONAL SUMF: BASKET
CDS rectonology uses fluid Rows and a
perfo..red screen in a lu/anced system
ro couse a narurol sep'rarion or solids
from fluids. The continuous c¡"",/aling
flow OW!< rhe 5ep'ro [;on sc<een. ...;[j,
rhe "'Y low .-e/ocity. keep, rt>. screen
from blodcing.
.
Standard Unit Capacities
& Physical Features
Manufacture Mode" Treatment Capacity Design 5ump Depth Below Foot Print Î
Material Designation Hood Loss Capacity PÕpe ~rt Diametor
cfs MGD (It) (yd') (It) (It)
FSW20_20 1.1 0.7 0.31 0.7 4.5 4.5 I
Fiberglass
F5W30_28 3.0 2.0 0.43 1.8 5.3 6.0 I
P5W30_28 3.0 2.0 0.43 1.8 7.0 6.5
Precasr" P5W50_50 11 7.3 0.78 1.9 9.6 9.5
Con"""e P5W70JO 26 17.3 1.10 3.9 14.0 12.5 I
P5W1 OCU 00 62 41.3 1.55 8.6 16.0 17.5
C5W150_134 148 96.7 2.11 Varies Varies 25.5 I
Can in Place CSW200_164 270 180.0 2.60 Varies I Varies 3c.5
Concrele
CSW240_150 300 200.0 2.60 Varies Varies CI.0 !
'CDS Fiberglass IF). Precast IP). and Cut in Place IC!. Slormw..er (SW) I
.. CDS Te~hnologies con customize unitS 10 meet sp<cific design flows and sump capacities
.
?S
.
.
.
.
.
/R
.
.
.
-
..-"'.,,",,-, ." .
:8t
'.'
".
EXHIBIT "C"
PROJECT BUDGET
ITEM ESTIMATED COST
Mobilization 5,600
Clearing and Grubbing 13,500
Modifications to Existing Stormwater Pipes ,18,000
Purchase and Install CDS Structures 525,000
Restoration 10,800
SUBTOTAL 572,900
Contingency (15%) 86,000
Engineering (10%) 57,300
Surveying (6%) 34,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST 750,200
LCWA PORTION: not to exceed
$375,100.00
$375,1.00.00
CLERMONT PORTION:
27